zaterdag 6 juni 2009

Obama vraagt van Israel een nieuw vredesbeleid

 
Nog een artikel van afgelopen woensdag, toen Obama voor zijn Midden-Oosten reis een kort onderhoud met Barak had in Washington.
 
Een goed idee: Israel kan niet alleen maar blijven afwachten en zeggen dat eerst het Iraanse probleem opgelost moet worden. Door zelf met een fatsoenlijk vredesplan te komen kan Israel juist de Arabische vredeswil op de proef stellen: als men inderdaad geen vrede wil (zoals velen in Israel, niet geheel ten onrechte, beweren) kan Israel een redelijk voorstel doen, zoals Olmert vorig jaar aan Abbas deed, of Barak aan Arafat, zonder het risico te lopen dat het wordt aanvaard en men het moet uitvoeren.
 
RP
---------------

Last update - 14:48 03/06/2009       
Obama to tell Israel: Form new peace policy by July
By Barak Ravid, Natasha Mozgovaya and Tomer Zarchin, Haaretz Correspondents
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1090067.html
 
 
United States President Barack Obama intends to give Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu four to six weeks to provide an "updated position" regarding construction in West Bank settlements and the two-state principle.
 
Obama made a surprise appearance on Tuesday at a meeting Defense Minister Ehud Barak was holding in Washington, shortly before the U.S. leader was set to leave on a five-day trip to the Middle East.
 
Obama spoke for about 15 minutes with Barak, who was meeting with National Security Adviser General Jim Jones at the time. While Obama's official schedule did not include a meeting with Barak, he has in the past dropped into other officials' meetings with international figures.
 
According to an official Israeli source, Obama wants to complete the formulation of a preliminary six-month plan for progress toward a Middle East peace agreement and to present it in July.
 
The U.S. special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, will arrive in Israel next Monday night. He will meet with Netanyahu the day after in a bid to obtain clarifications regarding the U.S. demand to stop construction in the settlements and on the principle of two states for two peoples.
 
According to the Jerusalem source, Mitchell is expected to seek answers to questions raised during his meeting with the prime minister's advisors last week in London as well as to issues raised by senior administration officials following their meeting with Barak on Monday.
 
Mitchell is to visit the Palestinian Authority on Wednesday to meet with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
 
Barak and Jones met for more than two hours privately and discussed the settlements controversy. Obama will arrive in Riyadh today, continuing on to Cairo to deliver a much-anticipated speech tomorrow Thursday aimed at repairing frayed relations with the Muslim world.
 
While in Riyadh, Obama is expected ask Saudi King Abdullah to give a green light to other moderate Arab countries, particularly the Gulf States, to take steps toward normalization with Israel, such as the opening of diplomatic missions or public meetings with senior Israeli officials, in exchange for a freeze on settlement construction. It is unclear whether the Saudis will cooperate.
 
Before Obama left for the Middle East he sent messages to both Israel and the Arab countries via interviews he to the BBC and National Public Radio.
 
Part of being a good friend is being honest," Obama told NPR regarding relations with Israel. "
 
"I think there have been times where we are not as honest as we should be about the fact that the current direction, the current trajectory, in the region is profoundly negative, not only for Israeli interests but also U.S. interests," he said.
 
Obama also said he did not rule out future talks with Hamas, but only if the organization met demands to recognize Israel, disavow violence and honor existing agreements.
 
Tensions between Israel and the U.S. are making pro-Israel Congress representatives uneasy. Last week 329 representatives sent a letter to Obama outlining the "right way" to peace in the Middle East, calling on Obama to be an honest broker and also a friend to Israel.
 
Despite tensions over the settlement issue, Israel and the U.S. are to begin high-level consultations next week on the Iranian nuclear program and the dialogue between Washington and Tehran. The Prime Minister's Bureau declined to comment on the consultation.
 
A government source said that the meeting would be the first of a joint working group on the Iranian issue, decided on during Netanyahu's visit to Washington. The aim of the working group is to coordinate moves on the Iranian nuclear issue and update Israel on U.S. intentions in its dialogue with Iran.
 
The Israeli delegation to the group is expected to be led by National Security Council head Uzi Arad and is to include officials from the Defense MInistry, the Mossad, Military Intelligence, the Foreign Ministry and the Atomic Energy Commission.
 
The U.S. team will probably be headed by Deputy National Security Adviser Tom Donilon.
 
The first meeting is expected to deal with the upcoming elections in Iran and the possible opening of U.S. dialogue with Tehran after a victor is declared.
 
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman met yesterday in Moscow with Russian President Dimitri Medvedev and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, and stressed the need to stop the Iranian nuclear program.

Wat schortte aan Obama's toespraak over Israel en de Palestijnen


Where he, terribly, missed a vital opportunity from Israel's point of view, however, was in legitimizing our Jewish nation-state solely on the basis of our people's persecution through the centuries, which "culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust."
Yes, of course, denying the Holocaust is 'baseless, ignorant and hateful." And yes, "threatening Israel with destruction" does indeed serve "to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve."
But our rights in this land are not predicated solely, or even primarily, on the tragedies that have befallen us during our history in exile. Those rights relate, rather, to the fact that we were in exile - from this land, this historic Jewish homeland. This is the only place on earth where the Jews have ever been sovereign, the place we never willingly left, the place to which we always prayed to return.
 
Daarnaast had Obama uit moeten leggen dat de Joden een volk zijn en als zodanig recht hebben op zelfbeschikking. Dit wordt in de Arabische wereld meestal ontkend, en hij had iets duidelijker kunnen maken dat de Palestijnen zelf mede verantwoordelijk zijn voor hun lijden. Er is pas vrede mogelijk wanneer de Palestijnen en Arabieren erkennen dat de Joden net zo verbonden met het land zijn als zijzelf en er legitieme rechten hebben, ook in hun hoofdstad Jeruzalem. De Palestijnse Autoriteit maakte gisteren direct duidelijk zover nog lang niet te zijn.
 
RP
----------------


The Jerusalem Post
Analysis: Obama's admirable, vital new beginning... and unfortunate first misstep
By DAVID HOROVITZ
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1244035000729&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


Astutely invoking his own personal Muslim background, and wrapping his challenge in words of appreciation for Islam as a potential force for tolerance, President Barack Obama nonetheless spoke harsh truths to the Muslim world in Cairo on Thursday. And he was applauded.

Offering, and demanding, a new beginning in relations between Islam and the West, he appealed to a respect for human life, which he said was common to all faiths but which he stressed Muslim radicals have come to disregard. "We will... relentlessly confront violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security. Because we reject the same thing that people of all faiths reject: the killing of innocent men, women and children," he said. And he was applauded.

This was, of course, only a first step. "No single speech can eradicate years of mistrust," he noted. But one way to measure the achievement even this single speech constituted is to ask whether his predecessor could have conceived it, delivered it and been cheered for it. The answer, three times, is no.

From the particular, partisan perspective of the Netanyahu government, the content was as problematic as would have been expected - no more so, but certainly no less.

There was the insistent reiteration of the two-state vision, the repeated outlawing of even natural growth in the settlements - albeit in a clause that was notable for its plainly deliberate semantic complexity - and the outlining of a future multi-faith Jerusalem. Here, Obama was setting out traditional American policy - positions that accord with president Bill Clinton's eleventh-hour effort to achieve a permanent agreement in 2000, positions that were anathema then, and are anathema now, to the Likud and the Right.

From the broader, non-partisan Israeli perspective, it was heartening to hear the president tell the Muslim world of America's "unbreakable bond" with our country, and to hear him highlight the "cultural and historical ties" at the heart of that relationship, rather than mere cold, potentially transient, American interests.

It was good to hear him make clear that the Arab League peace initiative was "an important beginning but not the end of [Arab states'] responsibilities," and to urge the Arab world "to recognize Israel's legitimacy" and stop using the Arab-Israeli conflict as a pretext "to distract the people of Arab nations from other problems."

Less encouraging was the strikingly brief portion of his speech devoted to Iran. "When it comes to nuclear weapons, we have reached a decisive point," he said, promisingly. But in choosing to continue by asserting Iran's right to "access peaceful nuclear power," he offered no reassurance to Arab regimes panicked by Teheran's drive to the bomb, and absolutely no reassurance to Israel.

Watching from here, his even-handed attribution of blame for the failure of peace efforts to date was jarring indeed. For more than 60 years," the president declared, the Palestinian people "have endured the pain of dislocation. Many wait in refugee camps in the West Bank, Gaza and neighboring lands for a life of peace and security that they have never been able to lead."

To which most Israelis, having now witnessed even Ehud Olmert's ultra-generous two-state terms being derisively brushed aside by Mahmoud Abbas, would retort: "And whose fault is that?"

But Obama used his platform, too, to insist that "Palestinians must abandon violence. Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and does not succeed." And, seconds later, he repeated and elaborated: "It is a sign of neither courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children, or to blow up old women on a bus. That is not how moral authority is claimed; that is how it is surrendered."

He said this without including a parallel criticism of Israel's military response to such killing. He said this to a Muslim audience in Cairo.

Where he, terribly, missed a vital opportunity from Israel's point of view, however, was in legitimizing our Jewish nation-state solely on the basis of our people's persecution through the centuries, which "culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust."

Yes, of course, denying the Holocaust is 'baseless, ignorant and hateful." And yes, "threatening Israel with destruction" does indeed serve "to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve."

But our rights in this land are not predicated solely, or even primarily, on the tragedies that have befallen us during our history in exile. Those rights relate, rather, to the fact that we were in exile - from this land, this historic Jewish homeland. This is the only place on earth where the Jews have ever been sovereign, the place we never willingly left, the place to which we always prayed to return.

The culminating tragedy of the Holocaust occurred only because we had been denied that rightful homeland. Six million Jewish lives were lost because that legitimacy was not internationally internalized in time. This president, in that place, should have emphasized the point - stressed the physical root of our legitimacy to a Muslim world, and especially a Palestinian populace, that overwhelmingly refuses to acknowledge it.

Instead, unfortunately, the president spoke of the "displacement" of Palestinians "brought by Israel's founding" (while making no mention of the Arab world's rejection of the Arab entity that would have been simultaneously created alongside us). In so doing, he reinforced the very portrayal of Israel as a modern colonial upstart that Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad so cynically and strategically asserts.

In so painstakingly calibrated an address, delivered in so vital and urgent a cause, this was a stark failure, and one Obama should himself recognize the need to rectify as he translates his talk into action. For Muslim recognition of our fundamental right to be here, precisely here, is central to the president's admirable quest to make a better world, a peaceful world, a new beginning.

Iran adviseert Hamas in Gazastrook

 
Iran heeft in de Gazastrook meer invloed dan doorgaans aan het licht komt.........
 
------------------

Teheran is closer than we think

 
 
According to Ha'aretz, Hamas dismissed two military commanders because of their performance during the recent  Israeli Operation Cast Lead. It shows us who really won in Gaza, and it also shows that Iran micromanages Hamas. For all intents and purposes, we have Teheran in Gaza, a few miles from Tel Aviv:
Hamas political leader Khaled Meshal recently relieved two brigade commanders in the Gaza Strip on Iranian recommendations, Palestinian sources said Wednesday. The two officers, Bassam Issa and Imat Aakel, were removed from their positions following the recommendation of Iranian Revolutionary Guard officials who participated in the investigation of the perceived Hamas military failure during Operation Cast Lead. The two officers have been known to lead military wing formations in two of the Strip's refugee camps, Nuseirat and Bureij, and became brigade commanders when the Hamas regular military force was established.
 
During Operation Cast Lead, Hamas forces avoided confrontation with the IDF and did not incur great casualties among the Israeli troops. Because of the perceived failure, the organization's leadership decided to initiate a thorough investigation of the conduct of its men during the operation.
 
Palestinian sources said Meshal consulted Hassan Mahdawi, commander of the "Jerusalem Column" in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, a unit stationed in Lebanon. After the investigation was concluded, the Hamas leadership decided to change the organizational structure of the military wing and remove a number of field commanders.
 
Issa and Aakel have also recently been at odds with Hamas' new interior minister, Fathi Hammad, who had tried to extend his authority over the organization's military wing. The ongoing disagreements between the Hamas government and senior commanders in the military wing resulted in the unauthorized firing of a Grad-type rocket at Ashkelon about three months ago. The launch was carried out as a protest by the military wing against the constraints set by the government.
 
Palestinian sources said Hammad decided to prosecute any persons involved in criminal activity, including activists from the military wing. He also banned the use of dark windows in all Gaza vehicles - popular among Hamas activists. The sources said Hammad enjoyed the support of the commander of the military wing, Ahmed Al-Jabari, while some local commanders, like Aakel and Issa, disagreed. Fatah sources claim Hamas' internal crisis was further aggravated by other senior leadership figures, who blame their lack of recent promotion on Hammad.
 
 

Alternative Information Center demoniseert Israel met Europese subsidies

NGO Monitor, AIC: Demonizing Israel and Opposing �Normalization�

Het Alternative Information Center, dat tegen vrede en tegen Israel is, wordt door bijvoorbeeld Zembla als betrouwbare bron beschouwd.

-------------------


June 04, 2009
NGO Monitor - Promoting Accountability in the Arab-Israeli Conflict
AIC: Demonizing Israel and Opposing "Normalization"
 
 
The Alternative Information Center (AIC) is a radical political organization run by individuals with links to the Trotskyite anti-Zionist Revolutionary Communist League (Matzpen) and the PFLP terror group. Its funders include: Diakonia (from the Swedish government), Christian Aid (Irish government), and Sodepau (Catalan government in Spain).

Examples of AIC rhetoric:
 
 "…Israel's colonial strategies of ethnic cleansing, systematic segregation, the denial of basic civil and human rights and the erasing of Palestinians from history…"
 
"Shimon Peres is definitely an enemy of the Palestinian people, of human rights and of peace, and any kind of collaboration by a Palestinian organization with the Peres Center is scandalous..."
 
"Only the choice of resistance can put an end to the occupation. Fighting and negotiating together."
 
"Barak and the rest of them – to Nuremberg!"
 
"[Sanctions] can provide an excellent framework to fight normalization with Israel."

Israel has "put itself...outside the community of civilized countries."
 
 
Click here for the full report

_______________________
NGO Monitor
1 Ben Maimon Blvd.
Jerusalem, 92262 Israel
mail@ngo.monitor.org
www.ngo-monitor.org

vrijdag 5 juni 2009

Afspraken Israel met Bush over beperkte groei nederzettingen Westoever


Wat voor afspraken waren er tussen Israel en de VS wat betreft de bouw in nederzettingen? Israel beschuldigt de VS ervan met Bush overeengekomen afspraken nu te schenden. Naar blijkt, waren Israel en de VS overeengekomen dat Israel de Routekaart voor Vrede pas accepteerde als het, onder voorwaarden, in de nederzettingen mocht blijven bouwen. Het woord 'settlement freeze' uit de Routekaart heeft zo een wel heel rekkelijke definitie gekregen. Daarbij heeft Bush een brief geschreven waarin hij duidelijk maakte dat Israel zich niet geheel achter de Groene Lijn hoeft terug te trekken in een toekomstig vredesverdrag. Zoals elders uitgelegd, vind ik het de vraag in hoeverre Israel zich op dergelijke, deels mondelinge afspraken, kan blijven beroepen. Anderzijds is het wel belangrijk te weten, hoe je daar zelf ook over denkt, dat de bouw in de nederzettingen van de afgelopen jaren in overeenstemming was met afspraken en gebonden aan regels, al waren die niet tot in detail uitgewerkt.
 
Onderstaand artikel is van donderdag voor de speech van Obama.
 
RP
--------------
 
New York Times - June 4, 2009
Israelis Say Bush Agreed to West Bank Growth
 
 
JERUSALEM — Senior Israeli officials accused President Obama on Wednesday of failing to acknowledge what they called clear understandings with the Bush administration that allowed Israel to build West Bank settlement housing within certain guidelines while still publicly claiming to honor a settlement "freeze."

The complaint was the latest in a growing rift between the Obama administration and the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over how to move forward to achieve peace in the Middle East. Mr. Obama was in Saudi Arabia on Wednesday and is scheduled to address the Muslim world from Cairo on Thursday.

The Israeli officials said that repeated discussions with Bush officials starting in late 2002 resulted in agreement that housing could be built within the boundaries of certain settlement blocks as long as no new land was expropriated, no special economic incentives were offered to move to settlements and no new settlements were built.

The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity so that they could discuss an issue of such controversy between the two governments.

When Israel signed on to the so-called road map for a two-state solution in 2003, with a provision that says its government "freezes all settlement activity (including natural growth of settlements)," the officials said, it did so after a detailed discussion with Bush administration officials that laid out those explicit exceptions.

"Not everything is written down," one of the officials said.

He and others said that Israel agreed to the road map and to move ahead with the removal of settlements and soldiers from Gaza in 2005 on the understanding that settlement growth could continue.

But a former senior official in the Bush administration disagreed, calling the Israeli characterization "an overstatement."

"There was never an agreement to accept natural growth," the official said Tuesday, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the delicacy of the matter. "There was an effort to explore what natural growth would mean, but we weren't able to reach agreement on that."

The former official said that Bush administration officials had been working with their Israeli counterparts to clarify several issues, including natural growth, government subsidies to settlers, and the cessation of appropriation of Palestinian land.

The United States and Israel never reached an agreement, though, either public or private, the official said.

A second senior Bush administration official, also speaking anonymously, said Wednesday: "We talked about a settlement freeze with four elements. One was no new settlements, a second was no new confiscation of Palestinian land, one was no new subsidies and finally, no construction outside the settlements."

He described that fourth condition, which applied to natural growth, as similar to taking a string and tying it around a settlement, and prohibiting any construction outside that string.

But, he added, "We had a tentative agreement, but that was contingent on drawing up lines, and this is a process that never got done, therefore the settlement freeze was never formalized and never done."

A third former Bush administration official, Elliott Abrams, who was on the National Security Council staff, wrote an opinion article in The Washington Post in April that seemed to endorse the Israeli argument.

The Israeli officials acknowledged that the new American administration had different ideas about the meaning of the term "settlement freeze." Mr. Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton have said in the past week that the term means an end to all building, including natural growth.

But the Israeli officials complained that Mr. Obama had not accepted that the previous understandings existed. Instead, they lamented, Israel now stood accused of having cheated and dissembled in its settlement activity whereas, in fact, it had largely lived within the guidelines to which both governments had agreed.

On Monday, Mr. Netanyahu said Israel "cannot freeze life in the settlements," calling the American demand "unreasonable."

Dov Weissglas, who was a senior aide to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, wrote an opinion article that appeared Tuesday in Yediot Aharonot, a mass-selling newspaper, laying out the agreements that he said had been reached with officials in the Bush administration.

He said that in May 2003 he and Mr. Sharon met with Mr. Abrams and Stephen J. Hadley of the National Security Council and came up with the definition of settlement freeze: "no new communities were to be built; no Palestinian lands were to be appropriated for settlement purposes; building will not take place beyond the existing community outline; and no 'settlement encouraging' budgets were to be allocated."

He said that Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser at the time, signed off on that definition later that month and that the two governments also agreed to set up a joint committee to define more fully the meaning of "existing community outline" for established settlements.

In April 2004, President Bush presented Mr. Sharon with a letter stating, "In light of new realities on the ground, including already existing major Israeli population centers, it is unrealistic to expect that the outcome of final status negotiations will be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949."

That letter, Mr. Weissglas said, was a result of his earlier negotiations with Bush administration officials acknowledging that certain settlement blocks would remain Israeli and open to continued growth.

The Israeli officials said that no Bush administration official had ever publicly insisted that Israel was obliged to stop all building in the areas it captured in 1967. They said it was important to know that major oral understandings reached between an Israeli prime minister and an American president would not simply be tossed aside when a new administration came into the White House.

Of course, Mr. Netanyahu has yet to endorse the two-state solution or even the road map agreed to by previous Israeli governments, which were not oral commitments, but actual signed and public agreements.

In his opinion article in The Washington Post, Mr. Abrams, the former Bush official who was part of negotiations with Israel, wrote: "For the past five years, Israel's government has largely adhered to guidelines that were discussed with the United States but never formally adopted: that there would be no new settlements, no financial incentives for Israelis to move to settlements and no new construction except in already built-up areas. The clear purpose of the guidelines? To allow for settlement growth in ways that minimized the impact on Palestinians."

Mr. Abrams acknowledged that even within those guidelines, Israel had not fully complied. He wrote: "There has been physical expansion in some places, and the Palestinian Authority is right to object to it. Israeli settlement expansion beyond the security fence, in areas Israel will ultimately evacuate, is a mistake."

Helene Cooper contributed reporting from Washington.

Regering Netanjahoe: 'Israel deelt Obama's hoop op vrede'


Gemengde reacties vanuit Israel op Obama's speech.
 
--------------

The Jerusalem Post
Jun 4, 2009 14:38 | Updated Jun 4, 2009 23:00
'Israel shares Obama's hope for peace'
By GIL HOFFMAN AND JPOST STAFF
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1244034998681&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

 
The Prime Minister's Office responded to US President Barack Obama's address to the Muslim world on Thursday by expressing hope that it would help lead to reconciliation between the Muslim world and Israel.

"The government of Israel expresses hope that President Obama's important speech will lead to a new period of reconciliation between the Arab and Muslim world, and Israel. We share Obama's hope that the American effort will bring about an end to the conflict and to pan-Arab recognition of Israel as the Jewish state.

"Israel is obligated to peace and will do as much as possible to help expand the circle of peace, while taking into consideration our national interests, the foremost of which is security," the statement concluded.

President Shimon Peres praised Obama, saying that his "speech was a speech filled with a vision, [it was] a brave speech which promises hard work for all of the sides involved in advancing the peace process in the Middle East.

"The idea of peace was born in the Middle East and is a basic term [used] in the three monotheistic religions - Christianity, Judaism and Islam - and it is up to the children of Abraham to join hands in order to meet the challenge together - sustainable peace in the Middle East."

Meanwhile, politicians across the political spectrum reacted with both praise and condemnation to his words.

"This is a direct, significant and brave appeal, in which President Obama has formulated his vision and the important universal values he wishes to share with the Muslim world," Defense Minister Ehud Barak said in a statement from Washington, where he was meeting with Henry Kissinger. "The speech contains reinforcement and encouragement for the moderate and peace-seeking elements, as well as an affront to terror and extremist elements threatening stability in our region and peace in the world.

"We praise the president's commitment to the existence and safety of Israel, as well as his clear call for Israel's integration in the region," Barak said.

"We hope the Arab world will heed President Obama's call to bring an end to terror and violence and establish peaceful ties with Israel. We will act in coordination with the US to promote peace, while emphasizing the safeguarding of Israel's essential security interests," the defense minister concluded.

Other cabinet members had none of Barak's enthusiasm. "Obama ignored the fact that the Palestinians have not abandoned terror," Habayit Hayehudi Chairman Daniel Herschkowitz said during a tour of settlements south of Hebron. "The government of Israel is not America's lackey. The relations with the Americans are based on friendship and not submission, and therefore Israel must tell Obama that stopping natural growth in the settlements is a red line."

Another member of the same party, Zevulun Orlev, also reacted with dismay to the president's comments.

"The speech raises fears and worries about the [fate] of America's balanced relationship towards Israel," he said. "I have a bad feeling ... traditional commitments of the United States towards the security needs which ensure the existence and independence of the state of Israel are being eroded.

"The answer to this is not capitulation or flattery," Orlev continued, "but rather the negotiation" to convince the US of the Israeli position."

In contrast, Kadima MK Ze'ev Boim used the opportunity to both laud the speech and criticize the government of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

"Obama's speech is further proof that Netanyahu did not properly gauge the policies of the Untied States," he said. "The policies of the president on the Palestinian issue are identical to those of Kadima, and it is unfortunate that Netanyahu is unable to accept the idea of two states for two peoples for narrow political reasons."

Labor rebel MK Eitan Cabel also had words of praise for the president and condemnation for the prime minister.

"The president's words made it very clear that in Washington they are unwilling to turn a blind eye," he said. "Time is working against us, and the Israelis interest of not being a serial rejector means accepting two states for two peoples and stopping construction of settlements."

United Arab List MK Ahmed Tibi said that while he agreed with the speech, there was "no Israeli partner to implement" it.

"Obama presented a new and balanced approach and semantics in his speech, and reiterated that the settlements are not legitimate," he said. "This approach requires active steps that will be the test of his policy."

"His words of praise for Islam are a counterweight to Islamaphobia, and what he said about Palestinian suffering is an important basis for diplomatic progress," Tibi added.

Hadash MK Dov Henin joined Tibi, Cabel, and Boim in their praise of the speech.

"The whole world understands that a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is essential and urgent for security and peace in the entire world," he said. "The time has come for the Israeli public to make its voice heard in a clear way against the refusal of the Netanyahu government to make peace."

Outside of the Knesset, reactions were also mixed. Aliza Herbst, resident and spokeswoman for the Ofra settlement, said that modern history has shown that the Muslim world is at war with the West. She said that Obama's vision of peace sounded nice but was not realistic.

The citizen's committees of Judea and Samaria said the speech was an expression of Israel "paying the price for the defeatism of its leaders."

"Hussein Obama chose to adopt the lying versions of the Arabs, which were always stated persistently and brazenly, over the Jewish truth, which is stated in a weak and stuttering voice," the settlers said in a statement.

It was time for Netanyahu to join the ranks of Menahem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, "arise as a proud Jewish leader and declare that he rejects with repugnance the rewritten history that Obama attempted to dictate today," they said.

 
AP contributed to this report.

Onderhandelingsruimte over nederzettingen tussen Israel en VS


Israel kan de kans op Amerikaanse flexibiliteit verhogen door zichzelf ook flexibel op te stellen en niet steeds keihard te roepen dat het door gaat met het bouwen in de nederzettingen.
Over de vraag hoe Obama's woorden over de nederzettingen precies geinterpreteerd moeten worden zal menige Israelische politcus zijn hoofd nog breken, maar duidelijk is dat de nederzettingen nu ook door Amerika als een groot probleem worden gezien en daarmee dient terdege rekening te worden gehouden.
 
Het is jammer dat Obama in zijn speech de legitimiteit van Israel slechts verbond met antisemitisme en de Holocaust, en niet met het recht van het Joodse volk op zelfbeschikking, en de verbondenheid van de Joden met het land. Misschien iets voor een volgende speech?
 
RP
--------------

US official to 'Post': We can find deal on West Bank settlements
Jun. 5, 2009
HERB KEINON and Jerusalem Post staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
 
Washington feels "an arrangement that works" can be hammered out with Israel on the settlement issue, a senior administration official told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday, indicating the US recognizes some wiggle room in defining a "settlement freeze."
 
"There's a professional, constructive dialogue on this issue," the official said, shortly after US President Barack Obama delivered his speech in Cairo. "We have differences, but believe we can find an arrangement that works."
 
The official said that some of the comments reportedly made on the issue by anonymous officials both in Israel and the US had been "heated" and not always credible.
 
"We're working this through, consistent with the relationship between strong allies," he said.
 
Israeli officials, meanwhile, were struggling to understand what precisely Obama meant when he discussed the settlement issue in his speech.
 
"The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace," he said. "It is time for these settlements to stop."
 
One diplomatic official said the construction of this paragraph seemed intentionally vague, enabling further discussion on the matter with the US.
 
US Middle East envoy George Mitchell is scheduled to arrive in Israel on Tuesday, to continue discussing the matter.
 
The senior US official said Washington and Jerusalem were also continuing to have a conversation about a two-state solution, something Obama forcefully backed in Cairo but which Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has still not endorsed.
 
The official stressed that Obama's speech was not a one-time effort at outreach to the Islamic world, and that the idea was now for continuous dialogue with Muslims. He added that this candid dialogue would help the US "get a fair hearing" in the Islamic world regarding its "unshakable" backing for Israel.
 
The official acknowledged that Obama may have missed an opportunity during his speech to speak about the Jews' historical connection to Israel, framing Israel's legitimacy instead only within the context of persecution and the Holocaust.
 
He stressed that Obama had spoken about the Jews' historic connection to the land in the past.
 
"It was certainly not a deliberate omission this time," he said.
 
_,_._,___

PA hoorde Obama zeggen dat Jeruzalem voor moslims en christenen is?


Ook Ami Isseroff wijst op de wel vreemde vertaling door Abu Rdeina van Obama's speech die gericht was op verzoening.
 
Abu Rdeina continued on: we believe that Israel must take Obama's Speech today seriously. He pointed that the US President's call for Israel to stop colonization and for establishing a Palestinian state, and that Jerusalem is for Muslims and Christians is a clear message to Israel that it should choose between peace and the continuation of tension.
 
Wat hij ook vergeet is dat Obama ook een boodschap had voor de Palestijnen:
 
Threatening Israel with destruction - or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews - is deeply wrong, and only serves to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve.
Palestinians must abandon violence. Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and does not succeed.
 
It is a sign of neither courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children, or to blow up old women on a bus. That is not how moral authority is claimed; that is how it is surrendered.
Now is the time for Palestinians to focus on what they can build. The Palestinian Authority must develop its capacity to govern, with institutions that serve the needs of its people. Hamas does have support among some Palestinians, but they also have responsibilities. To play a role in fulfilling Palestinian aspirations, and to unify the Palestinian people, Hamas must put an end to violence, recognize past agreements, and recognize Israel's right to exist.

----------------
 
Abu Rdeina: Obama's Speech Contains Clear Message to Israel
Date : 4/6/2009
Time : 16:55
http://english. wafa.ps/?action=detail&id=12742

 
RAMALLAH, June 4, 2009 (WAFA - PLO news agency) - Palestinian Presidency Spokesman, Nabil Abu Rdeina, said that US President Barack Obama's speech is a new American beginning, and a clear message to the Israelis.

Abu Rdeina told WAFA that President Obama's preparedness for partnership, establishing confidence and facing tensions, and his words about the suffering of Palestinians and him saying that the time has come to establish a Palestinian state is the first essential step towards building a just and comprehensive peace in the Middle East.

Abu Rdeina continued on: we believe that Israel must take Obama's Speech today seriously. He pointed that the US President's call for Israel to stop colonization and for establishing a Palestinian state, and that Jerusalem is for Muslims and Christians is a clear message to Israel that it should choose between peace and the continuation of tension.

War and Peace Index: 60% Israëli's vertrouwt Obama niet

 
Israëli's zijn bezorgd om het beleid van Obama en de kritische toon die hij aanslaat naar Israël.
 
__________________

60% of Israelis don't trust Obama
War and Peace Index reveals 55% of Israeli Jews believe US president leans in favor of Palestinians, while only 5% say he supports Israeli position.
Majority of respondents say Netanyahu's Washington visit was unsuccessful.
 
Ynet
 
Even before Barack Obama's historic "reconciliation speech" in Cairo on Thursday, the majority of the Israeli public - 55% - felt the US president leans in favor of the Palestinians.

Only 5% said Obama supports the Israeli stance, while 31% said they feel he is neutral, a poll published on Thursday showed.

Sixty percent of Israelis don't trust the president to consider and protect Israel's interests during his efforts to improve relations between America and the Muslim world.

The War and Peace Index, published on Ynet once a month, showed that 65% of the respondents feel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's trip to Washington was unsuccessful, while 19% feel it was successful.

Nonetheless, the majority of the respondents - 56% feel the stance Netanyahu presented to the US was neither too rigid, nor too lenient, but just right. Thirteen percent said the prime minister's position was too rigid, while 9% said it was too lenient. The rest said they didn't know.

The sweeping majority (67%) of the Jewish public in Israel still believes there is not chance for an agreement with the Palestinians that doesn't include the two states for two people's formula, while only 18% think there is a chance for an agreement without this formula.

The Jewish Israeli population is spilt on the matter of settlements, with a small majority of 48% saying they weaken the Israeli interest, as opposed to 43% who said settlements actually contribute to the State's interests.

A majority of 53% said Israel should not agree to evacuate all settlements, even if a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians depended on it, while 41% said they support evacuation.

A breakdown to the types of settlements in question yields different results. With regards to illegal outposts and isolated settlements located in the heart of the Palestinian population, as opposed to the major settlement blocs, 53% of the respondents said Israel should agree to evacuate them. Only 29% disagreed.

The survey is funded by two academic bodies belonging to Tel Aviv University: The Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research and the Evens Program in Mediation and Conflict Resolution. The surveys are conducted by the B. I. Cohen Institute of Tel Aviv University. The joint academic responsibility for the project, including formulation of the questionnaires and analysis of the findings, is held by Prof. Ephraim Yaar of Tel Aviv University and Prof. Tamar Hermann of the Open University.

Toespraak president Obama in Cairo over Midden-Oosten conflict

 
Barack Obama hield in Cairo een in diplomatiek opzicht vrij stevige maar redelijk evenwichtige speech, die al als 'historisch' wordt gekwalificeerd. De internationale reacties waren overwegend positief. Er zat dan ook, zo te zeggen, voor elk wat wils in, behalve voor de echte fanaten.
 
Hieronder het deel dat Israel en de Palestijnen en Iran betreft.
 
Zie ook over Obama en het Israelisch-Palestijnse conflict: Een frisse bries uit Amerika
 
Twee blogs met eerste reacties op de toespraak van Obama:
 

Wouter
_______________

Transcript: President Obama Addresses Muslim World in Cairo
CQ Transcriptwire
Thursday, June 4, 2009; 6:32 AM
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/04/AR2009060401117.html?hpid=artslot
 
 
[the part about Israel, the Palestinians and Iran:]
 
America's strong bonds with Israel are well known. This bond is unbreakable. It is based upon cultural and historical ties, and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied.
 
Around the world, the Jewish people were persecuted for centuries, and anti-Semitism in Europe culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust. Tomorrow, I will visit Buchenwald, which was part of a network of camps where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death by the Third Reich. Six million Jews were killed - more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. Denying that fact is baseless, ignorant, and hateful. Threatening Israel with destruction - or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews - is deeply wrong, and only serves to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve.
 
On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people - Muslims and Christians - have suffered in pursuit of a homeland. For more than sixty years they have endured the pain of dislocation. Many wait in refugee camps in the West Bank, Gaza, and neighboring lands for a life of peace and security that they have never been able to lead. They endure the daily humiliations - large and small - that come with occupation. So let there be no doubt: the situation for the Palestinian people is intolerable. America will not turn our backs on the legitimate Palestinian aspiration for dignity, opportunity, and a state of their own.
 
For decades, there has been a stalemate: two peoples with legitimate aspirations, each with a painful history that makes compromise elusive. It is easy to point fingers - for Palestinians to point to the displacement brought by Israel's founding, and for Israelis to point to the constant hostility and attacks throughout its history from within its borders as well as beyond. But if we see this conflict only from one side or the other, then we will be blind to the truth: the only resolution is for the aspirations of both sides to be met through two states, where Israelis and Palestinians each live in peace and security.
 
That is in Israel's interest, Palestine's interest, America's interest, and the world's interest. That is why I intend to personally pursue this outcome with all the patience that the task requires. The obligations that the parties have agreed to under the Road Map are clear. For peace to come, it is time for them - and all of us - to live up to our responsibilities. Palestinians must abandon violence. Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and does not succeed.
 
For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation. But it was not violence that won full and equal rights. It was a peaceful and determined insistence upon the ideals at the center of America's founding. This same story can be told by people from South Africa to South Asia; from Eastern Europe to Indonesia. It's a story with a simple truth: that violence is a dead end. It is a sign of neither courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children, or to blow up old women on a bus. That is not how moral authority is claimed; that is how it is surrendered. Now is the time for Palestinians to focus on what they can build. The Palestinian Authority must develop its capacity to govern, with institutions that serve the needs of its people. Hamas does have support among some Palestinians, but they also have responsibilities. To play a role in fulfilling Palestinian aspirations, and to unify the Palestinian people, Hamas must put an end to violence, recognize past agreements, and recognize Israel's right to exist.
 
At the same time, Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel's right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine's. The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop.
 
Israel must also live up to its obligations to ensure that Palestinians can live, and work, and develop their society. And just as it devastates Palestinian families, the continuing humanitarian crisis in Gaza does not serve Israel's security; neither does the continuing lack of opportunity in the West Bank. Progress in the daily lives of the Palestinian people must be part of a road to peace, and Israel must take concrete steps to enable such progress.
 
Finally, the Arab States must recognize that the Arab Peace Initiative was an important beginning, but not the end of their responsibilities. The Arab-Israeli conflict should no longer be used to distract the people of Arab nations from other problems. Instead, it must be a cause for action to help the Palestinian people develop the institutions that will sustain their state; to recognize Israel's legitimacy; and to choose progress over a self-defeating focus on the past.
 
America will align our policies with those who pursue peace, and say in public what we say in private to Israelis and Palestinians and Arabs. We cannot impose peace. But privately, many Muslims recognize that Israel will not go away. Likewise, many Israelis recognize the need for a Palestinian state. It is time for us to act on what everyone knows to be true. Too many tears have flowed. Too much blood has been shed. All of us have a responsibility to work for the day when the mothers of Israelis and Palestinians can see their children grow up without fear; when the Holy Land of three great faiths is the place of peace that God intended it to be; when Jerusalem is a secure and lasting home for Jews and Christians and Muslims, and a place for all of the children of Abraham to mingle peacefully together as in the story of Isra, when Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed (peace be upon them) joined in prayer.
 
The third source of tension is our shared interest in the rights and responsibilities of nations on nuclear weapons.
 
This issue has been a source of tension between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. For many years, Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country, and there is indeed a tumultuous history between us. In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically- elected Iranian government. Since the Islamic Revolution, Iran has played a role in acts of hostage-taking and violence against U.S. troops and civilians. This history is well known. Rather than remain trapped in the past, I have made it clear to Iran's leaders and people that my country is prepared to move forward. The question, now, is not what Iran is against, but rather what future it wants to build.
 
It will be hard to overcome decades of mistrust, but we will proceed with courage, rectitude and resolve. There will be many issues to discuss between our two countries, and we are willing to move forward without preconditions on the basis of mutual respect. But it is clear to all concerned that when it comes to nuclear weapons, we have reached a decisive point. This is not simply about America's interests. It is about preventing a nuclear arms race in the Middle East that could lead this region and the world down a hugely dangerous path.
 
I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons. That is why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons. And any nation - including Iran - should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That commitment is at the core of the Treaty, and it must be kept for all who fully abide by it. And I am hopeful that all countries in the region can share in this goal.

donderdag 4 juni 2009

Twee roadblocks bij Ramallah verwijderd door IDF


Dit soort nieuws wordt altijd volkomen genegeerd door onze media, in tegenstelling tot de kleinste verbeteringen aan Palestijnse kant.
 
RP
------------


IDF Spokesperson
June 3rd, 2009
Additional Roadblocks Removed in Judea and Samaria

 
Yesterday, June 2nd, 2009, the Rimonim and Bir Zeit roadblocks located in the Binyamin region, near Ramallah were removed. This step was taken following a meeting held the day before between the GOC Central Command, Maj. Gen. Gadi Shamni, the Head of the Judea and Samaria Division, Brig. Gen. Noam Tibon, the Head of the Civil Administration, Brig. Gen. Yoav Mordechai, and the Head of the Palestinian Security Forces in charge of civilian affairs in the Palestinian Authority in Judea and Samaria, Hassin el-Sheik.

During the meeting, in which the senior officers discussed various security and civilian related issues, it was decided, in accordance with decisions made by the Israeli government, to take various steps which would significantly improve the daily life of Palestinian civilians in the Judea and Samaria region. A number of security coordination meetings have taken place this year, resulting in a range of steps designed to widen Palestinian free movement, to strengthen the Palestinian Security Forces and the Palestinian economy.

The Rimonim roadblock, located east of Ramallah was completely removed yesterday, allowing free passage from the city to the Jordan Valley area. The Bir Zeit roadblock, located north of Ramallah, which was also removed yesterday, now allowing quick passage from the city to the villages to the north.

Furthermore, Atzira A-Shamalia, a central checkpoint located near Nablus, will now operate 24 hours a day, easing movement in the area.

These steps were taken to widen the free movement of the Palestinian population and are in addition to the 145 roadblocks which were removed in the past year.

During the meeting, it was also decided to finalize the process granting Palestinian businessmen permits to pass through Israeli crossings into Israel. This will allow the businessman and public figures who play an important role in the Palestinian economy greater freedom to conduct their business. These permits will be granted in accordance with authorization by the Civil Administration.

The IDF will continue to operate according to the decisions made by the Israeli government and on the basis of ongoing security assessments, in order to further ease the daily  life of the Palestinian population in Judea and Samaria while continuously fighting terror and maintaining the safety of the citizens of the State of Israel.

Open brief Knessetleden Arbeidspartij aan Barack Obama

 
Vier Knessetleden van coalitiepartij Labor, waaronder oud-minister Amir Peretz, schreven ook een brief aan Obama; welke vredesgroep gaat deze bezorgen?
 
Wouter
____________


The Jerusalem Post
Jun 3, 2009 21:27 | Updated Jun 3, 2009 21:30
An open letter to President Barack Obama
By YULI TAMIR, EITAN CABEL, AMIR PERETZ , OPHIR PINES-PAZ
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1244034989198&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


Dear President Obama,

We write this open letter with great hopes and out of deep concern that Israel is about to miss the opportunities that your presidency offers the Middle East.

We welcome the fact that you are about to arrive in our region. Your forthcoming speech in Egypt, we are sure, will sow the seeds of a new era grounded in an emphasis on negotiation, attempting to bridge cultural and religious gaps, exchanging a culture of war with a culture of dialogue.

We believe that a process of reconciliation with the Arab world, as well as the beginning of an immediate and intensive process of negotiation with our Palestinian neighbors will strengthen Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, a state that treats all its citizens with justice and respect and lives with its neighbors in a political atmosphere of acceptance and stability.

We know that you are deeply committed to Israel's security and well-being. Like many in Israel and abroad, we believe that a two-state solution - grounded in a painful territorial compromise and mutual recognition - is the only solution that can sustain the Zionist dream of establishing a national homeland for the Jews.

It is for this reason that we deeply regret the fact that you are not paying a visit to Israel.

Such a visit would have been received with great enthusiasm by all those who wish to see your leadership and vision paving the way for a better future for the next generations in Israel and its neighbors.

 
The writers are Labor MKs.

Hamas stuurt Obama uitnodiging voor Gaza

 
De houding van Hamas tegenover Obama.
 
Hamas is net zo fel tegen vrede als de radikale Israelische kolonisten, die 'hun' land voor geen goud willen verlaten en tegen ieder compromis gekant zijn. Hamas is minstens net zo erg, en doet geregeld agressieve, opruiende en antisemitische uitspraken. Ook zegt men keer op keer duidelijk Israel nooit te zullen erkennen:
 
Ismael Haniya, the legitimate Palestinian Prime Minister, told foreign dignitaries visiting Gaza last month that Hamas wouldn't abandon its principles under pressure.
"We will not cave in to pressure, we will not betray our people's trust, we will not recognize the illegitimate Zionist entity. This has always been our stance, and it will never change."
Haniya suggested that when it comes to recognizing the evil Zionist entity, the PLO represented only itself, not the entire Palestinian people.
He pointed out that acknowledging the legitimacy of the Zionist regime effectively meant a tacit recognition of all the hideous crimes committed by Israel, including the expulsion and ethnic cleansing of millions of Palestinian refugees from their ancestral homeland.
 
Maar dat zegt Hamas niet tegen Obama, niet tegen Westerse journalisten en ook niet tegen Westerse 'vredesactivisten'.
Onderstaand een gelikte en vrij slijmerige brief van Hamas aan Obama over Israelische oorlogsmisdaden, Palestijnse mensenrechten en wederzijds respect. Wie de staat van dienst en retoriek van Hamas kent, kan zich alleen maar verbazen. Ook over de naiviteit van de Amerikaanse vrouwenvredesgroep die bereidwillig voor postbode speelt.
 
En dan nog zijn er mensen die beweren dat Israels hasbara zo gelikt is, dat zij alles recht kan praten wat krom is en zich altijd als het slachtoffer en de redelijke partij weet voor te doen.
 
RP & WB
----------------------

Exclusive: Hamas invites Obama to Gaza in letter
Date: 03 / 06 / 2009 Time: 18:19
www .maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=38284


Bethlehem - Ma'an Exclusive - An American group returning from Gaza says it will deliver a letter from Hamas to US President Barack Obama who is to give a landmark address to the Muslim world in the Egyptian capital on Thursday.

Hamas official Ahmad Yousef confirmed that he wrote the letter, which the US women's antiwar group CODEPINK plans to deliver on Thursday.

Yousef sent a copy of the letter, in Arabic, to Ma'an. The following is a translation:

-----------------------------------------
            Mr. President Barack Obama,

            President of the United States of America,

            June 3, 2009

            We welcome your visit to the Arab world and your initiative to break the problems between you and the Muslim world. One of the most important points causing tension between the United States and this part of the world is the failure to find a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

            Unfortunately, you won't visit the Gaza Strip and listen to our point of view during your visit to the Middle East. The minister of foreign affairs and [envoy to the Middle East] Mr. George Mitchell also will not visit the Gaza Strip.

            We have received in the recent period many foreign delegations of different political backgrounds, including representatives from the US Congress and European parliamentarians, as well as the Chairman of the [UN] Fact-Finding Commission Mr. [Richard] Goldstone, in addition to many groups. The latest was CODEPINK from America.

            It is very important to visit the Gaza Strip and to witness the results of the Israeli war and these crimes that lasted 22 days. So many people were killed by Israel, which has the encouragement of the United States.

            Human Rights Watch documented that the use of the white phosphorus by Israel against United Nations schools and it was discovered that it is made in the US . they concluded by stating that Israel's use of white phosphorous is a war crime ... The question is for Americans: If you are the makers of such weapons and you are the owners of this weapon and you support Israel, how did Israel violate international law and used this weapon!?

            Mr. President,

            Before becoming the president of America you were a distinguished university professor in law, and your administration has indicated that it will work to strengthen the rule of law in the Arab and Islamic world.

            The International Court of Justice ruled in June 2004 that all of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem belong to Palestinians and they are the ones who have the right to decide the future of their political existence and that the settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories are illegal. Fifteen judges and representatives of the highest international judicial authority did not add any conditions or dissent to these statements.

            We have also noted that the most important and international organizations; such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, supported the right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and receive compensation.

            The human rights organizations noted also that the siege imposed by Israel on the Gaza Strip is a punishment that violates international law.

            We are, in the Hamas government, committed to a just solution to the conflict in keeping with international law and the rulings of the International Court of Justice and the [UN] General Assembly and human rights organizations. We are ready to continue with all parties on the basis of mutual respect, without any prior requirements or conditions.

            Again, we would welcome President Obama to the Gaza Strip, in order to see the damage done. Such a visit will put the United States in a higher position in the view of the entire world in order to solve the conflict.

            Regards,

            Dr Ahmed Yousef

            Undersecretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
            ----------------------------------------

            At 9am on Thursday the delegation of journalists, social workers, professors and activists will carry the letter to the US Embassy in Cairo along with a petition signed by more than 10,000 Americans asking Obama to go to Gaza to witness the impact of the recent Israeli invasion there and its ongoing blockade.

            "Obama should go to Gaza and see the devastation for himself, or send envoy George Mitchell," said Medea Benjamin in a statement.

            Benjamin is co-founder of CODEPINK, which led the group through Gaza. "There will be no significant improvement in relations between the United States and the Arab world until the U.S. begins to deal directly with Hamas and shows its commitment to the rights of both Palestinians and Israelis."

            Egypt allowed the 66-person delegation through the Rafah crossing into Gaza on 30 May. The group brought toys, school supplies and playground building supplies, and built three small playgrounds there.

            The group said in a statement that it was "shocked by the brutality of the Israeli invasion that killed more than 1,400, displaced more than 50,000 people and destroyed approximately 4,000 homes." They were also appalled by the effects of the 21-month siege that has "virtually sealed the borders and constitutes a form of collective punishment, which is illegal under international law."

            Approached by Ma'an, US officials in Jerusalem have not yet responded to this report. The US officially considers Hamas a "terrorist" organization and thereby refuses to deal directly with it.
 

Israelische minister fel tegen bevriezing Joodse nederzettingen


Israels houding tegenover Obama, althans die van de (Shas) minister van binnenlandse zaken. Tenminste betreffende de buitenposten staat deze haaks op het voornemen van Barak (die erover gaat) en uitspraken van Netanjahoe, die benadrukte dat de Israelische wet moet worden gehandhaafd.
 
Anders dan we in Nederland gewend zijn, spreekt de Israelische regering niet met één mond. Het belooft dan ook een echt 'vechtkabinet' te worden.
Of Yishai zijn zin krijgt, is nog maar zeer de vraag, maar zijn felle uitspraken zijn bepaald niet bevorderlijk voor de relatie met de Amerikaanse regering, of voor het toch al beroerde imago van Israel in het Westen.
 
 
RP & WB
---------------------

Yishai vows to use power of his ministry to expand settlements
Gil Hoffman and jpost.com staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
On the eve of US President Barack Obama's speech to the Muslim world in Cairo, Interior Minister Eli Yishai announced Wednesday that he will respond to Obama's outreach to the Arabs by expanding West Bank settlements.

In a meeting with leaders of Council of Jewish Communities in Judea and Samaria at his Jerusalem office, the Shas chairman said he invited them while Obama was in the region, because the US president's speech reinforced the need to consolidate Israeli society.

"The American policies are not coincidental and everyone must know that the bad situation will only get worse in the near future," Yishai told the settler leaders.

"I promise to use my ministry, all the resources at my disposal and the ministry's impact on local authorities for the good of expanding settlements," he said.

Yishai told the settler leaders that he would not tolerate the removal of even a single outpost in Judea and Samaria. He said he did not understand why nothing was being done against some 57,000 illegal Arab buildings in the Negev, east Jerusalem and the Ramle-Lod area.

"In this difficult time, it's important to meet and strengthen one another and set policies accordingly," Yishai told The Jerusalem Post after the meeting. "We respect the United States and we want to maintain a positive relationship with the Americans, but we must stand up for our principles and we cannot accept dictates that the public cannot tolerate."

He called on the West Bank leaders to pressure other cabinet ministers to make their views in favor of supporting the settlements known to the public.

The leaders said after the meeting that they appreciated his help, but that they needed backing from other key ministers, especially Defense Minister Ehud Barak of Labor.

"We didn't ask Yishai for more funding than any other regions are getting," Gush Etzion Regional Council Chairman Shaul Goldstein said.

"We did ask him to stop the discrimination against Judea and Samaria in his ministry's funding and we received that commitment from him. But the defense minister has the real power over building in Judea and Samaria and he's not from Shas," Goldstein noted.

The settler leaders said Obama's statement about America being one of the largest Muslim countries(*) reinforced to them how difficult their current situation was.

The head of Habayit Hayehudi, Science Minister Daniel Herschkowitz, will tour settlements south of Hebron during Obama's speech on Thursday, to strengthen Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's hand in his objections to Obama's insistence on stopping natural-growth construction in the settlements.

"That's a red line that we won't allow to be crossed," Herschkowitz said.

Also Wednesday, Yishai ordered Shas MK David Azoulay to submit a bill according to which the interior minister would have the power to revoke citizenships without the authorization of the attorney-general or the court.

Currently, Citizenship Law stipulates that revoking citizenship requires the attorney-general's authorization and the court's consent.

Yishai is pushing for the amendment in the wake of delays in revoking the citizenships of four Arab Israeli terror suspects currently residing abroad.

______________
 
(*) What Obama actually said:

Now, the flip side is I think that the United States and the West generally, we have to educate ourselves more effectively on Islam. And one of the points I want to make is, is that if you actually took the number of Muslims Americans, we'd be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world. And so there's got to be a better dialogue and a better understanding between the two peoples.

[PS: schattingen variëren sterk, maar met 2 tot 5 miljoen moslims in de VS lijkt die uitspraak van Obama toch wat overdreven...]

 

Joodse organisaties VS afwachtend naar beleid Obama over nederzettingen


De meeste Ameriaanse Joodse organisaties vinden het te vroeg de alarmklok te luiden over Obama's druk op Israel.
Een Joods democratisch congreslid verwoordt zijn houding als volgt:

Wexler offered his own idea for a compromise, suggesting that the Jewish state offer to freeze all natural growth of settlements on the Palestinian side of the security fence as a "credible first step." He said Israel needed to make some sort of movement on the settlement issue as a way to test whether the Arab world is serious about peace with Israel.

Israel zal op zijn minst enige flexibiliteit moeten tonen in plaats van alleen maar te klagen over de Amerikaanse kritiek.
 
RP
------------
 
Groups silent in face of Obama calls for settlement freeze
Eric Fingerhut
Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA)
June 2, 2009 - 12:00am
http://jta.org/news/article/2009/06/02/1005572/groups-silent-in-face-of-obama-calls-for-settlement-freeze
 

Even as it publicly stakes out a hard-line position against Israeli settlement expansion, the Obama administration is avoiding serious criticism from most U.S. Jewish groups and pro-Israel Democratic lawmakers.

Key pro-Israel Jewish Democrats have backed the president on the importance of an Israeli settlement freeze while also suggesting there is room for a compromise between the Netanyahu government and the White House.

Meanwhile, the major Jewish centrist organizations -- including the Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Committee, Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and AIPAC -- have refrained from issuing statements criticizing the Obama administration on the issue.

Some Jewish leaders said that while worries had been growing in recent days, the community wanted to wait until after President Obama's speech Thursday in Cairo to fully assess the situation.

Their concern spiked after what they saw as "stark" comments by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton last week in which she said that "with respect to settlements, the president was very clear when Prime Minister Netanyahu was here: He wants to see a stop to settlements -- not some settlements, not outposts, not natural growth exceptions."

In subsequent interviews, Obama has reiterated the call for a settlement freeze, but also stressed that "it's still early in the conversation" and that "patience is needed." The president also has stressed the White House's continuing commitment to Israel's security, isolating Hamas and fighting to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

While the Bush administration also called for a settlement freeze, observers said the Obama administration's tone and seeming willingness to follow up marks a significant change from the previous White House. The key flashpoint surrounds the issue of "natural growth," which often is understood to encompass any kind of building and construction to accommodate growing families -- from building an extra room to a house to additional schools, community services and synagogues in growing neighborhoods.

Last month, former deputy national security adviser Elliott Abrams publicly confirmed the existence of an unwritten agreement that then-President George W. Bush and then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon reached in 2004, stating that Israel could continue to build in large Israeli settlements in the West Bank that the Jewish state was likely to keep in any final peace deal.

The Obama administration reportedly has backed away from that understanding -- but, as some observers and unnamed U.S. officials have pointed out, only after Netanyahu refused to echo his predecessors' endorsement of a two-state solution.

"There would usually be a great deal of deference if he did his part," said the Middle East Forum's Steve Rosen, formerly the longtime foreign policy director at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. But without such an affirmation for a two-state solution by Netanyahu, "it weakened his ability to play that card."

Abraham Foxman, the ADL's national director, said the organized Jewish community was still treading cautiously, not wanting to "push any buttons and exacerbate the situation" in order to see what the president says in his speech to the Muslim world this week.

"It's a crisis in formation" -- but not yet a crisis, said Foxman.

"Everybody is holding their breath until after Thursday," he said.

The chairman of the Conference of Presidents, Alan Solow, also said it was "too early to come to any conclusion" on how the settlement discussions will play out.

"I'm watching very carefully to see that the American leadershp and the Israeli leadership have a candid exchange of views," said Solow, an early Obama supporter during the campaign.

While Jewish lawmakers and centrist Jewish organizations have steered clear from directly critcizing the Obama administration, more than 75 percent of the members of the House of Representatives have signed on to an AIPAC-backed letter to the president stating, among other things, that the United States should seek to settle its disputes with Israel in private.

Some Jewish leaders have expressed puzzlement at the administration's willingness to bring the argument out in the open so quickly.

"It's not clear what's to be gained by this public exchange on settlements, especially because there's not much likelihood of a deal at this point" and "a private channel exists," said an official at one Jewish organization who did not want to be identified.

Even Republican Jews, who attacked Obama throughout the presidential campaign for his positions on Israel, have been relatively quiet in recent days.

Matt Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, said his organization was waiting until after the Cairo speech to make a formal statement in order to have a "full sense of what's going on," although he said the group was "deeply concerned about the path this administration is taking."

Left-wing pro-Israel groups, which have been encouraging Obama to press for a settlement freeze since his inauguration, were pleased that the White House appears to be sticking to its demands.

Americans for Peace Now spokesman Ori Nir said the shift is "sweeping, if in fact the administration will stand behind its words and enforce these positions."

The Zionist Organization of America criticized the settlement freeze proposal immediately after last month's Obama-Netanyahu meeting, saying "it simply penalizes Jews, because they are Jews, from living in the ancestral heartland of the Jewish people."

Late Tuesday, the Orthodox Union weighed in with a letter to Obama, saying it was "deeply troubled" by his approach to settlements because his typical "nuanced approach" was "glaringly absent."

"To the contrary, this policy has, to date, reflected a blunderbuss, one-size-fits-all attitude toward everything from building a new house on an empty lot in the midst of the city of Ma'ale Adumim, to erecting new houses on an empty hilltop in Samaria," wrote leaders of the Orthodox Union, which has increasingly aligned itself publicly with the settler movement in recent years.

According to multiple reports, Netanyahu and his aides were shocked to discover in a meeting last month with Jewish members of Congress the degree to which they sided with Obama. Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) said it was the first time during such a meeting that he recalled an Israeli prime minister being pressed on the settlement issue in his 13 years in the House.

"Those people who have been some of Israel's staunchest and most vocal supporters in the past and would be in the future are advocating this policy and supporting the president because it is a policy in best interests of the United States and Israel," said Wexler, an early supporter and outspoken Jewish surrogate for Obama during the presidential campaign. "I'm convinced Netanyahu feels the same way. He just has to figure out the dynamic that will support it and we have to give him the time and room to do that."

Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-N.Y.) said he still wanted the Obama administration to more clearly define what exactly it meant by "natural growth," but generally backed the idea of stopping settlements.

"We're not talking about dismantling settlements, we're talking about a settlement freeze," said Ackerman, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia. "Settlements have proven to be one of the things that have been problematic."

Ackerman said he still wanted to hear specifically whether the administration's definition of natural growth was all about buildings, or also included people.

"I don't know how you can tell families they can't have children," he said, but expanding the "footprint" of a settlement through building or other construction was problematic.

"I think there is room for compromise," he said.

Wexler offered his own idea for a compromise, suggesting that the Jewish state offer to freeze all natural growth of settlements on the Palestinian side of the security fence as a "credible first step." He said Israel needed to make some sort of movement on the settlement issue as a way to test whether the Arab world is serious about peace with Israel.

"American Jews or Israel should not be concerned" by the recent tension over settlements, he said.

"All of this is within the context of empowering the president of the United States to extract from the Arab world normalization measures that the Arab world has never contemplated before," Wexler said.

Two of the more hard-line Jewish Democrats in Congress, Reps. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) and Shelly Berkley (D-Nev.), did voice some concerns this week.

"My concern is that we are applying pressure to the wrong party in this dispute," Berkley said in an interview with Politico. "I think it would serve America's interest better if we were pressuring the Iranians to eliminate the potential of a nuclear threat from Iran, and less time pressuring our allies and the only democracy in the Middle East to stop the natural growth of their settlements.

"When Congress gets back into session," she added, "the administration is going to hear from many more members than just me."

 

woensdag 3 juni 2009

Antisemitisme daalt in VS maar stijgt in Hongarije

 
Intolerantie en rechtsextremisme in Oost-Europa zijn al jaren een bron van grote zorg, en met de economische crisis dreigt het alleen maar erger te worden. Uit Rusland, Polen, Oost-Duitsland en nu ook Hongarije komen zorgwekkende berichten, die schrikbeelden van voor de 2de Wereldoorlog oproepen.
 
Maar ook in het westen blijft waakzaamheid geboden tegen antisemitisme en vreemdelingenhaat. Gisternacht zag ik nog de herhaling van "In Europa" over Vichi-Frankrijk met haar 'Jodenstatuut'. In dat land werd onlangs een 'antizionistische partij' opgericht, die Le Pen nog te slap vond. In Oostenrijk, het land van Jörg Haider, heeft de grootste krant (de Kronen Zeitung) al jaren antisemitische en xenofobe ondertonen, en in Turkije willen de meesten geen Joodse buren. Het stemt allemaal weinig optimistisch......
 
Wouter
___________

Anti-semitism: Down in US, but perhaps rising elsewhere.

http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/06/anti-semitism-down-in-us-but-perhaps.html

According to the ADL, 'Anti-Semitic incidents in the US are declining'. But elsewhere, there are disquieting sings. Hungarian police have legitimized anti-Semitism, for example. Here's the Hungarian story in brief, first:
"Given our current situation, anti-Semitism is not just our right, but it is the duty of every Hungarian homeland lover, and we must prepare for armed battle against the Jews."

This quote appeared in a newsletter published by an organization calling itself "The trade union of Hungarian police officers prepared for action"....

... It is little wonder, given the fact that the union has signed a cooperation agreement with the radical right wing Hungarian party "Jobbik" (Movement for better Hungary) which backs and operates the extremist paramilitary movement "Hungarian Guard" and warns against the "gypsy crime" - in effect trying to terrorize Hungary's gypsy community, as well as its Jewish community or anyone else they don't like.
To anyone vaguely familiar with the history of Hungary in the 1930s, the above is worrisome, to say the least. And here is the report from the US:
The number of anti-Semitic incidents in the United States declined for the fourth consecutive year, according to statistics issued by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) on Monday.
 
The ADL's annual Audit of Anti-Semitic Incidents counted a total of 1,352 incidents of vandalism, harassment and physical assaults against Jewish individuals, property and community institutions in 2008, representing a seven percent decline from the 1,460 incidents reported in 2007.
 
The report identified 37 physical assaults on Jewish individuals, 702 incidences of anti-Semitic vandalism, and 613 cases of harassment in 2008. They included acts against high-profile Jewish community institutions and communal properties, such as the repeated vandalism of the San Francisco Holocaust Memorial, and the desecration of dozens of graves at a Jewish cemetery in Chicago with swastikas and hate group symbols.
 
Of the total 1,352 incidents, 42% occurred at homes, private buildings or businesses, and 23% took place in educational establishments, including public and private schools and universities.
 
"It is encouraging that the number of anti-Semitic incidents continues to decline, but the sheer volume of incidents reported and the violent nature of many of the physical assaults is a reminder that we cannot be complacent," said Abraham H. Foxman, ADL national director, mentioning the recent alleged terrorist bombing plot against synagogues in Riverdale, New York.
 
The report comprised data from 44 states and the District of Columbia, including official crime statistics as well as information provided to ADL's regional offices by victims, law enforcement officers and community leaders. The report identified criminal acts, such as vandalism, violence and threats of violence, as well as non-criminal incidents of harassment and intimidation, including hate propaganda, leafleting and verbal slurs.
 
Anti-Semitic incidents last peaked in 2004, when the ADL reported 1,821 incidents in the US.
 

Onderzoek naar invloed media Israel op beeldvorming ultra-orthodoxen

 
Ik kan me hierbij zeker iets voorstellen. De mainstream media in Israel zijn evenals in Nederland liberaal geöriënteerd, en de ultra-orthodoxe gemeenschap daar is groot genoeg om potentieel de vrije meningsuiting te kunnen bedreigen (al zijn me daar geen praktijkvoorbeelden van bekend). Een doelgroep vormen ze ook al niet voor de reguliere media, want die zijn veel te goddeloos; zij hebben overwegend hun eigen religieuze kranten, en velen zullen helemaal geen tv hebben.
 
Wouter
_____________

Study conducted among secular, religious students finds they believe media fueling tensions between sectors.
Prof. Yoel Cohen says press on both sides has an agenda
 
Kobi Nahshoni - Ynet
Published: 06.02.09, 14:19 / Israel Jewish Scene
www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3725082,00.html

 
Many in the religious and ultra-Orthodox society blame the media of being hostile towards them, and a new study that was recently released found that most seculars agree.

According to the study, 66% of seculars think that the media coverage of the haredi sector is unfair and unbalanced, and effectively contributes to fueling tensions between the different sectors in Israeli society.

The survey, conducted by head of the School of Communication at the Ariel University Center, Prof. Yosel Cohen, and head of the Department of Communications at the Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel Dr. Orli Zarfati, will be presented Tuesday at the 25th annual conference of the Association for Israel Studies in Beersheba.

Some 260 respondents, either university or yeshiva students, participated in the poll. Sixty-nine percent of seculars and 83% of haredim said that the media had a negative effect on haredi-secular relations, while 86% of national-religious respondents and 52% of seculars felt this way about the media's effect on religious-secular relations.

'Media a meeting point'
The study also found that 74% of seculars defined their knowledge of the haredi public as "poor," while 88% of them admitted that the secular media is their primary source of information on this society. Thirty-nine percent of seculars said they would like to see the media expand its coverage of the ultra-orthodox world.
Among haredim, only 40% said that the press is their number one source for information on the secular society, and only 17% wish the haredi media pay more attention to secular issues.

Prof. Cohen explained that "the media is a meeting point that introduces one community to the other, and it certainly has an effect and influence on the relations between them."

Cohen said that while the ultra-orthodox press presents the secular world as one of "non-Jewish" values, the secular media emphasizes the fact that haredim do not participate in public life like other sectors.

While seculars exhibit positive curiosity towards the haredi way of life, said Cohen, "the media hardly manages to penetrate through the black haredi attire."

Democraten VS ontevreden met eenzijdige druk Obama op Israel

 
Er is kritiek vanuit het congres wat betreft Obama's eenzijdige druk op Israel, maar die kritiek schijnt nogal mild te zijn vergeleken met wat eerdere presidenten die zich kritisch over Israel uitlieten, en eenzijdige druk wilden uitoefenen, aan kritiek kregen. Wat mijzelf vooral opvalt en stoort is het verschil tussen enerzijds de harde woorden over Israels nederzettingen, en anderzijds de milde bewoordingen waarin de Palestijnen op hun verantwoordelijkheden worden gewezen. Ik vind het ook bizar dat de VS Israels soevereiniteit niet respecteren, en op zowat alles wat het in Jeruzalem doet felle kritiek uitoefenen.
 
RP
-------------

Pressure On Israel Draws Dem Criticism
Politico: Obama Insistence That Israel Freeze Growth In Settlements Has Made Israel's Allies In Congress Concerned
 
 
 
As President Barack Obama prepares to depart for his first trip to the Arab world, the administration's escalating pressure on Israel to freeze all growth of its settlements on Palestinian land has begun to stir concern among Israel's numerous allies in both parties on Capitol Hill.
 
"My concern is that we are applying pressure to the wrong party in this dispute," said Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-Nev.). "I think it would serve America's interest better if we were pressuring the Iranians to eliminate the potential of a nuclear threat from Iran, and less time pressuring our allies and the only democracy in the Middle East to stop the natural growth of their settlements."
 
"When Congress gets back into session the administration is going to hear from many more members than just me," she said.
 
Presidents from Jimmy Carter to George H.W. Bush saw attempts to pressure Israel draw furious objections from Congress, but members of Congress and observers say Obama will most likely prevail as long as he shows that he's putting effective pressure on Israel's Arab foes as well.
 
But even a key defender of Obama's Middle East policy, Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.), is seeking to narrow the administration's definition of "settlement" to take pressure off Obama. And the unusual criticism by congressional Democrats of the popular president is a sign that it may take more than a transformative presidential election to change the domestic politics of Israel.
 
Other Democrats, in interviews with POLITICO, raised similar concerns. While few will defend illegal Jewish outposts on land they hope will be part of a Palestinian state, they question putting public pressure on Israel while - so far - paying less public attention to Palestinian terrorism and other Arab states' hostility to Israel.
 
"There's a line between articulating U.S. policy and seeming to be pressuring a democracy on what are their domestic policies, and the president is tiptoeing right up to that line," said Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.), who said he'd heard complaints from constituents during the congressional recess. "I would have liked to hear the president talk more about the Palestinian obligation to cut down on terrorism."
 
"I don't think anybody wants to dictate to an ally what they have to do in their own national security interests," said Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-N.Y.), who said he thinks there's "room for compromise."
 
"I have to hear specifically from the administration exactly how they define their terms and is there room for defining the terms," he said, referring to the terms "settlement" and "natural growth."
 
Republicans have been more sharply critical of the pressure on Israel.
 
"It's misguided. Behind that pressure is the assumption that somehow resolving the so-called settlements will somehow lead to the ultimate goal" of disarming Iran, said Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), the House minority whip. "A backward assumption is being made that if we deal with the Israel-Palestine question, somehow all the problems in the Middle East will be solved," he said.
 
So far, Obama isn't backing down. He told National Public Radio Monday that he believes the U.S. must be "honest" with Israel about how the situation in the region needs to improve. He also renewed his call for a freeze on all Israeli settlements, and said the Palestinians must do more to improve security.
 
"I don't think we have to change strong support for Israel," Obama said. "We do have to retain a constant belief in the possibilities of negotiations that will lead to peace. And that's going to require, from my view, a two-state solution."
 
"Part of being a good friend is being honest," Obama said. "And I think there have been times where we are not as honest as we should be about the fact that the current direction, the current trajectory, in the region is profoundly negative, not only for Israeli interests but also U.S. interests. And that's part of a new dialogue that I'd like to see encouraged in the region."
 
The pro-Israel lobby AIPAC last week got the signatures of 329 members of Congress, including key figures in both parties, on a letter calling on the administration to work "closely and privately" with Israel - in contrast to the current public pressure. On his recent visit to the White House, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pressed Obama to take on Iran first and argued that a weakened Iran would set the stage for peace between Israel and the Palestinians.
 
The Obama administration, however, appears to have rejected that view and believes the appearance of American pressure on Israel, and progress in peace talks, will make it easier to wring concession from Arab allies on both Iran and on Israel.
 
On his upcoming trip to Riyadh this week, Obama is expected to press Saudi Arabia, along with other Arab states, to move toward normalizing relations with Israel, a breakthrough that might satisfy Israel's domestic allies and allow him more room to push the question of settlements, analysts said.
 
"If he gets the Arabs to stand up and produce normalization, it becomes easier for him to create a decision point for the Israelis and to outmaneuver his domestic political critics," said Aaron David Miller, a veteran former Mideast negotiator under Republican and Democratic administrations.
 
Despite the administration's efforts to make clear, public demands that Netanyahu freeze all settlement growth, however, the administration's allies have sought to loosen that commitment. One key question is what the Israelis call "natural growth," in which new buildings are constructed within existing settlements to accommodate, for instance, growing families.
 
Critics say it's a loophole that's been used for dramatic expansion, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explicitly ruled out making an exception for natural growth last week.
 
"I think that most people could understand somebody having a child and their child living with them, as long as it's not a ruse to expand" the settlement, said Ackerman, who said two of a dozen questions to Netanyahu during a meeting with members of Congress had concerned settlements.
 
Wexler, an early Obama ally and a staunch defender of his Middle East policy, said in his view, the settlement freeze should apply only to settlements outside Israel's security fence, or wall, and should exclude territory that appears likely to ultimately remain part of Israel.
 
"To expect Israel to have the same policy outside the security fence as inside the security fence is unrealistic; it's counterproductive," he said. "I don't think [the administration's] public statements have been specific enough" to resolve the question of whether they were referring to all settlements or only settlements outside the barrier, Wexler said.
 
"I'm comfortable with the whole package," Wexler said, pointing to pressure on Iran and demands for "visible and concrete steps toward normalization" and improved security in the Palestinian territories, as well as demands for a settlement freeze.
 
"Bibi Netanyahu can't be expected to perform his obligations if the broader Arab world is not willing to take serious steps toward normalizing relations with Israel," he said.
 
Other Democrats allied with Israel didn't respond to questions about Obama's policy, however. And the rhetoric, even from Obama's critics, remains relatively sedae compared with the open insurrection other presidents, from Carter to the elder Bush, have triggered with attempts to apply direct pressure on Israel.
 
"There's such a desire for him to be successful that he's lived this charmed life that most politicians, and most presidents, dealing with Israel wouldn't have," said one congressional Democrat. "In the early months, the finger is off the hair trigger on these issues."
 
 
By Ben Smith
Copyright 2009 POLITICO

Ruzie tussen VS en Israel over bouwplan hotel in Jeruzalem


Even los van de vraag of het een goed plan is, het is toch van de gekke dat de VS zich bemoeien met of en waar Israel een nieuw hotel bouwt in haar eigen hoofdstad? Dat men geheel nieuwe woonwijken op gebied dat tot de kern van het probleem behoort niet toejuicht, vind ik alleszins begrijpelijk, maar dit is echt vernederend. De oude stad heeft voor Israel een zeer bijzondere waarde, er hebben altijd Joden gewoond en voordat Jordanië ze vernietigde na de verovering van de oude stad in 1948 stonden er 60 synagoges. Als Israel er helemaal niks mag doen verliest zij daar - zonder daarvoor iets in ruil te krijgen - in feite een belangrijk stuk soevereiniteit.
 
RP
---------------
 
The battle for Jerusalem 2009 is joined
 
Last update - 02:48 02/06/2009       
U.S. demands halt to hotel at E. J'lem wholesale market
By Akiva Eldar, Haaretz
 
 
Washington is furious over the Interior Ministry's anticipated approval of a plan to build a new hotel in East Jerusalem, just 100 meters from the Old City's walls. The plan, which would see the demolition of a wholesale market and kindergarten, is slated to be approved today.
 
In conversations with Israeli officials, senior American officials have made it clear that they want Israel to freeze all plans for expanding the Jewish presence in East Jerusalem, and especially in the Holy Basin - the area adjacent to the Old City.
 
The regional planning and building committee for Jerusalem will discuss the plan today. It was submitted by the Jerusalem municipality, which owns the land on which the hotel is slated to be built, and the state-owned Jerusalem Economic Corporation, which will actually construct it.
 
The site in question is in the wholesale market, just east of the Rockefeller Museum.
 
The Interior Ministry's district planning office told Haaretz that it will recommend the plan's approval.
 
The plan calls for a 200-room hotel that will be nine stories tall on its eastern face (where the ground is lower). It will also include a commercial building, which will be five stories tall on its eastern face, plus another three stories underground.
 
The plan will require the existing wholesale market to be demolished, along with a Palestinian kindergarten.
 
The hotel plan is only one of several proposals for expanding the Jewish presence in East Jerusalem. Another, which would involve evicting hundreds of Palestinians from King's Valley, on the outskirts of Silwan, was approved yesterday by the Jerusalem municipality's planning committee despite the opposition of the city's legal advisor, Yossi Havilio.

dinsdag 2 juni 2009

Ministers Israel wijzen wetsvoorstel af voor eed van loyaliteit


De soep wordt weer eens wat minder heet gegeten dan hij wordt opgediend. Dergelijke voorstellen, al krijgen ze maar weinig steun in het kabinet, brengen Israels imago ernstige schade toe. Je wilt ondertussen niet weten hoeveel idiote en racistische wetsvoorstellen er in bijvoorbeeld de parlementen in Arabische staten worden ingediend, voor zover daar van dergelijke democratische vrijheden al sprake is, en hoeveel racistische wetten er in die landen zijn. Maar die krijgen, in tegenstelling tot Israel, nauwelijks aandacht.
 
RP
-------------

The Jerusalem Post
May 31, 2009 0:34 | Updated May 31, 2009 22:58
Ministers reject loyalty oath bill
By DAN IZENBERG AND HERB KEINON
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1243346507109&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


The ministerial legislation committee on Sunday rejected a bill calling on immigrants and 16-year-old Israelis receiving their first identity cards to pledge an oath of loyalty to the state and promise to perform military or other national service to qualify for citizenship.

According to Gil Solomon, Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman's media adviser, only the ministers belonging to Israel Beiteinu voted in favor of the bill, which was sponsored by party MK David Rotem, head of the Knesset Law Committee.

"I welcome this decision very much," said Minorities Minister Avishay Braverman. "It's about time that no more laws like this will be suggested. They only create tension with the Israeli Arab population, and they are immoral and undemocratic."

Braverman added that at a time when Israel needed all the international support it could get, approval of the law by the committee would have portrayed the country as a "marginal state."

According to the bill, anyone seeking citizenship, including people moving to Israel and 16-year-olds obtaining their first identity cards, would have to make the following vow: "I pledge to be loyal to the State of Israel as a Jewish, Zionist and democratic state, to its symbols and values, and to serve the state in any way asked of me in military service as required by law."

Braverman also told The Jerusalem Post that a coalition of liberal Likud MKs and ministers - Bennie Begin, Dan Meridor and Michael Eitan - would join forces with Labor ministers Isaac Herzog, Braverman and Shalom Simhon to defeat the other so-called loyalty bills.

One of them, known as the "Nakba Bill," calls for a prison sentence of up to three years for anyone who commemorates Independence Day as a catastrophe. The other calls for a one-year jail sentence for anyone who denies Israel's existence as a Jewish and democratic state.

A group of ministers has called for a revote by the cabinet plenum on the Nakba Bill, which was approved by the ministerial legislation committee last week. Braverman said the cabinet would reject the bill this time.

The second bill was approved in preliminary reading with coalition support last Wednesday by a vote of 47 to 34.

Cabinet secretary Zvi Hauser is putting together a compromise on the bill. Rather than outlawing these ceremonies, the new bill would end government support for organizations or municipalities that fund or organize such commemorations.

The search for a compromise came after the group of six ministers appealed the law, which made it through the interministerial committee on legislation last week. Hauser said he was looking for a balance between freedom of speech and government funding for these types of ceremonies.

"The government shouldn't have to fund shooting itself in the knee," he said, while indicating that there were freedom of speech issues involved in making it illegal for an individual to take part in private Nakba Day commemorations.

Egypte wijst Amerikaans plan af voor normalisering Arabisch-Israelische betrekkingen


Op het NOS journaal en in de kranten wordt het Arabische vredesplan vaak zo voorgesteld dat, als Israel bereid is zich terug te trekken uit de Westoever, Oost-Jeruzalem en de Golan, de Arabische wereld klaar staat om vrede met Israel te sluiten en betrekkingen aan te gaan. Het vredesplan is daarover echter vaag, en naar het lijkt is dat niet voor niets. Hetzelfde zou weleens kunnen gelden voor het vluchtelingenprobleem: het vredesplan is vaag, en door welwillende journalisten en politici wordt dat vaak zo uitgelegd als dat een voor Israel aanvaardbaar compromis mogelijk is. Of dat zo is, is echter zeer de vraag, gezien de nadruk die in de Arabische wereld op het 'recht op terugkeer' wordt gelegd, en de verwijzing naar VN resolutie 194.
 
RP
--------------

Egypt rejects U.S. plan for Arab-Israeli normalization
By Zvi Bar'el, Haaretz Correspondent
 
Egypt has rejected an American proposal for gradual normalization between the Arab world and Israel that would have allowed Israeli planes to fly freely through Arab air space.

The idea arose during discussions in Washington last week between Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, Egyptian intelligence chief Omar Suleiman and senior White House and State Department officials, including National Security Advisor James Jones and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

In an interview with the Saudi newspaper Asharq Al Awsat, Aboul Gheit said that U.S. officials had asked him what the Arab response would be if Washington pressured Israel to reach a peace agreement. He responded that after the Oslo Accords were signed, some Arab states allowed Israeli offices to open in their territory, but today, the Arab world insists on seeing concrete Israeli action before making any further gestures.

If Israel accedes to international demands, he continued, "the Arab states could accede to gradual normalization, each according to its own considerations."

That implies that Egypt does not see the Arab peace initiative as requiring Arab states to normalize relations with Israel uniformly and simultaneously. Rather, normalization is something each country would institute at a time it deems appropriate.

Aboul Gheit also rejected Jerusalem's demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state, saying this would endanger Israel's Arabs - "especially when Israel has a foreign minister who calls for expelling the Arabs to Palestine, or outside of Israel ... It is also impossible to rule out the possibility of an Israeli leader arising one day and saying, 'the number of Arabs in the state has risen, and we must reduce their demographic weight to maintain Israel's Jewish character.'"
 

Israelische regering weigert volledige bouwstop in nederzettingen

 
Het zou verstandiger zijn wanneer Israel zou zeggen het belang dat de VS hieraan hecht te begrijpen, en daar rekening mee te houden. Men zou ook kunnen aanbieden niet meer buiten de grote blokken te bouwen, en ook daarbinnen maar heel beperkt.
 
Het argument van de brief van Bush is zwak: een nieuwe president heeft het recht om nieuw beleid te maken, en de nieuwe wind uit Washington komt ook niet geheel onverwacht. Wanneer Israel zich welwillender toont (en ernaar handelt) kan het met meer recht verlangen dat de VS zich ook hard opstellen naar de Palestijnen en de Arabische staten.
 
RP
-------------

PM won't freeze settlement construction for natural growth
Herb Keinon , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
Israel will not freeze settlement construction for natural growth, despite intense pressure from the Obama administration to do so, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

While Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has indicated that he will remove illegal settlement outposts, he is determined, the Post has learned, to continue building for natural growth in settlements beyond the security barrier.

In Netanyahu's view, it is further understood that there is no reason housing units cannot be built inside the major settlement blocs for people who want to move there, as well as for natural growth.

In light of unequivocal comments made over the last week by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton calling for an end to all settlement construction, including for natural growth, as well as US and Israeli officials' failure to reach an agreement on this issue in London last week, there is a great deal of frustration over the matter in the Prime Minister's Office.

However, there is also a sense that Netanyahu simply cannot agree to the US demands.

Despite the failure of the London talks to resolve the issue, dialogue on the matter is continuing, with Defense Minister Ehud Barak expected to discuss the matter Monday in New York with US Middle East envoy George Mitchell, and then later in the week with US Vice President Joe Biden and National Security Adviser James Jones.

Representing the left flank of the Netanyahu government, Barak has made it clear that he, too, feels it is illogical and impossible to completely stop all construction in the settlements.

Israel has made clear to the Americans that while it will build for natural growth, it will do so in a way that will not impinge on the Palestinians - meaning that the construction will be within the designated boundaries of the settlements; there will be no expropriation of new land and no construction of any new settlements.

Considering Clinton's comments that there should be absolutely no new construction anywhere in the settlements, there is heightened concern in Jerusalem that her words presage the beginning of a rollback of understandings on settlement construction that were reached with the Bush administration, and that were anchored in then-president George W. Bush's 2004 letter to former prime minister Ariel Sharon.

Elliott Abrams, the former deputy national security adviser who was intimately involved in the issue, acknowledged these understandings in a Washington Post article in April, in which he said, "For the past five years, Israel's government has largely adhered to guidelines that were discussed with the United States but never formally adopted: that there would be no new settlements, no financial incentives for Israelis to move to settlements and no new construction except in already built-up areas. The clear purpose of the guidelines? To allow for settlement growth in ways that minimized the impact on Palestinians."

The current sense in Jerusalem is that a demand for Israel to stop all construction runs contrary to these guidelines, leading to the argument that if the US does not honor its previous understandings with Israel, then it has little right to demand that Israel live up to commitments it made in the past, such as taking down settlement outposts.

It is not yet clear in Jerusalem whether the US position on this issue is an "excuse" for the US to distance itself from Israel in the hopes of making inroads in the Arab world, or whether this is indeed a cardinal issue for administration officials.

There are those saying that the US is staking out a tough position now prior to Obama's anxiously awaited speech in Cairo on Thursday, but that the US will then "climb down from the tree" and come to a tacit agreement with Israel on the issue.

But there are others who believe that settlement construction is indeed a major irritant for the Obama administration, and that since the administration senses there is little support in Congress for construction in any of the settlements, whether in Ma'aleh Adumim or Yitzhar, the Obama administration will not back down on the issue.

The unmistakable message being conveyed to Jerusalem by some key supporters in the US is that at this time, there is not going to be a lot of understanding in the Democratic-led Congress for any building in the settlements.

Enquete: 64% Turken wil geen Joodse buren


Ik ben eigenlijk wel voorstander van toetreding van Turkije tot de EU - mits Turkije aan de voorwaarden voldoet, die voor iedere nieuwe lidstaat gelden, maar door een enquete als deze ga je wel weer even twijfelen....
 
RP
------------
 

Racism in Turkey - 64% do not want Jewish neighbors

 
 
A delightful finding from the Middle East's only (nominally) secular state with a Muslim majority. 64% don't want Jewish neighbors. Three out of four respondents would not like to live next to atheists or people who drink alcohol.  The margin of error for a survey of that size is about 2.5%, though AP writers don't seem to know that. Here's to the Democratic Secular State (I hope that's grape juice you're drinking, neighbor.)
 
By The Associated Press
 
 
A new study published in a Turkish newspaper Sunday said 64 percent of Turks would not want Jewish neighbors.
 
The study also suggested Turks had a low tolerance for diverse lifestyles in general, as three in four respondents said they would not want to live next to an atheist or anyone drinking alcohol.
 
The study by Istanbul's Bahcesehir University was meant to gauge radicalism and extremism in Turkey.
 
Results published in Sunday's Milliyet also stated that 52 percent would not want Christian neighbors, 67 would not want to live next to an unmarried couple and 43 percent would not want American neighbors.
 
The survey is based on interviews with 1,715 people selected randomly from 34 cities between April 12 and May 3. No margin of error was given.
 
 

Waarom is de Palestijnse Authoriteit van Abbas niet gematigd?


Ik ben het niet met ieder woord van Barry Rubin eens, maar veel van zijn kritiek op de New York Times komt overeen met de kritiek die ik heb op NRC Handelsblad of de Volkskrant. Overigens is het commentaar van de NYT bepaald genuanceerd vergeleken bij de commentaren van de NRC.
 
RP
--------------


Why Isn't the Palestinian Authority Moderate? Why don't Arab Leaders Obey the New York Times?

http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/2009/05/why-isnt-palestinian-authority-moderate.html
 
 
So dreadful was the performance of Palestinian Authority (PA) leader Mahmoud Abbas during his meeting with President Barack Obama that even the New York Times took notice. Usually, the Palestinians are exempt from any hint of the real world criteria applied to others.

But according to the May 30, Times editorial, the meeting was "a reminder of how much the Palestinians and leading Arab states, starting with Saudi Arabia and Egypt, must do to help revive foundering peace negotiations."

The peace negotiations, of course, foundered almost a decade ago when then PA leader Yasir Arafat rejected a two-state solution, an historical fact that the Times and much of the Western political elite seems not yet to have absorbed. Indeed, it was that very fact that has led to the failure of any peace process and all the bloodshed since.

Naturally, given its peculiar view of the world, the Times cannot quite blame anyone but Israel and George W. Bush for this failure:

"We have sympathy for Mr. Abbas, the moderate-but-weak leader of the Fatah party. Israel, the Bush administration and far too many Arab leaders have failed to give him the support that he needs to make the difficult compromises necessary for any peace deal."

This is the kind of paragraph by the way that should lead to reflection by anyone who was actually serious and not blinded by the strange brew that passes for the dominant ideology in Western intellectual circles nowadays. It is after all a set of beliefs which insists that Abbas—who wrote a doctoral dissertation denying that the Holocaust happened and prefers demanding all Palestinians can go live in Israel even if this stance prevents them from getting their own independent state—is better than Netanyahu. Abbas is branded "moderate" while Netanyahu is always called hardline.

Exactly what has Abbas done as the PA leader to be considered moderate, or at least moderate except in comparison to Hamas? If he had his way, he would make a deal with Hamas which would make him behave a lot more like Hamas rather than having Hamas become moderate.

At least, the Times added on this occasion: "That's no excuse, however, for the depressing passivity that Mr. Abbas displayed" in calling for the United States to wait until Hamas joined his government or Netanyahu made concessions for nothing in return.

It is somewhat humorous that while Netanyahu has been unfairly and inaccurately blasted for supposedly refusing to talk with the Palestinians it is the Palestinians who openly refuse to talk to Israel.

At any rate, there's nothing funnier than a newspaper editorial writer telling a dictator that he "must" do something. But why, why is Abbas so passive? Why doesn't Abbas do what the Times wants:

"He must keep improving those forces. He must redouble efforts to halt the constant spewing of hatred against Israel in schools, mosques and media. He must work harder to weed out corruption. Unless Mr. Abbas's government does more to improve the lives of Palestinians it will surely lose again to Hamas in elections scheduled for January."

Those elections won't be held at all, of course, for precisely that reason. But suppose Israel gives up land and authority to Abbas, he doesn't mend his ways, and then Hamas--as the Times warns could well happen--takes over an independent state so as to wage warfare against Israel all the more effectively and on two fronts?

The Times might spare a moment to consider that possibility. Israeli leaders must do so: U.S. leaders should do so.

 
Read the rest of this article on Rubin's report: Why Isn't the Palestinian Authority Moderate? Why don't Arab Leaders Obey the New York Times?
 
 

maandag 1 juni 2009

Zes Palestijnen gedood bij gevechten PA en Hamas

 
Weer een paar martelaren erbij voor de heilige Palestijnse strijd tegen de zionistische bezetter, gedood door de kogels van de verraderlijke collaborateurs van Fatah. Dat laatste is niet alleen de Hamas visie. Zo merkte een Nijmegenaar afgelopen week op internet op:
 
"Of dat Hamas op Fatah schiet, omdat het collaborateurs zijn, die een enorme schade aanrichten?"
 
Dat schiet lekker op met de vrede, als autochtone Nederlanders al partij kiezen voor Hamas tegen Fatah. Waarschijnlijk heeft deze fanaat ook de "I love Gaza" en "boycot Israel" grafiti in Nijmegen verspreid.
 
Wouter
________________
 

Six Palestinians killed in Hamas-PA clashes in Qalqiliya
Date: 31 / 05 / 2009  Time:  08:27
www. maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=38203

 
Bethlehem/Qalqilia - Ma'an - Six Palestinians were killed on Sunday morning in clashes between Palestinian Authority security services and gunmen affiliated to Hamas in the northern West Bank city of Qalqiliya, medical sources said.

According to the sources, three security officers and two Hamas fighters were killed, in addition to the owner of the building where the Hamas men had stationed themselves.

Officials named the PA-affiliated victims as Shahir Abu At-Tayyib and Abd Ar-Rahman Yasin, who were officers in the Palestinian preventive security services. A third security officer from the national security service was killed, but his identity remained unknown.

Meanwhile, Hamas affiliates Muhammad Yasin and Muhammad As-Samman were also killed in the clash, in addition to the owner of the building, Abd An-Nasser Al-Basha.

The clashes erupted late on Saturday night as a group of Hamas' militant wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades, opened fire at PA security services in Qalqiliya before they stationed themselves in a building in the city, Palestinian security sources told Ma'an.

The sources said security services spotted two gunmen who refused to identify themselves before they opened fire toward the security officials. Security besieged the gunmen and clashes erupted.

Late on Saturday night, Hamas' Al-Aqsa TV reported that two Hamas fighters were besieged in Qalqiliya, and called on the movement's affiliates to organize rallies to release the fighters.

For their part, Hamas' Al-Qassam Brigades accused PA security services of pursuing the group in Qalqiliya the week leading up to Sunday's incident. They said in a statement, "PA security conducted a wide-scale arrest campaign in Qalqiliya, particularly against dozens of Hamas affiliates. Then they besieged As-Samman and Yasin, demanding they hand themselves over, but they refused and asked security services to withdraw and let them go. PA security began shooting at the Hamas activists, and so they were forced to fire back."

The Brigades warned PA security of any attempt to harm "wanted Hamas activists," asserting that such targeting will mark a new phase and may lead to an explosion in violence.

Earlier, Hamas had accused PA security forces of arresting five of the Islamic movement's members in the West Bank on Thursday night, and another 14 the night before. The PA has not commented on these claims and, when pressed by journalists, has repeatedly denied that it holds political prisoners.

Sunday's PA-Hamas incident is the most violent in recent memory in the occupied territories since 2007's turmoil, when Fatah-affiliated PA forces gained control of the West Bank and Hamas took over Gaza.

It was not immediately clear how the latest flare up would affect talks planned in Cairo for between the two rival Palestinian movements, which have repeatedly met over the past year to try to resolve their differences and establish a Palestinian unity government.


--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

Achmadinejad overdrijft zijn rol in atoomprogramma Iran

 
Achmadinejad overdrijft zijn rol in de ontwikkeling van Irans atoomprogramma, aldus een Iraanse denktank. De rol die zijn (meer gematigde) voorgangers speelden was veel groter dan hij het doet voorkomen. Ook in het Westen wordt vaak gedaan alsof alleen Achmadinejad het probleem is, en het Westen met een gematigder leider wel tot een deal zou kunnen komen. Dat laatste is wellicht waar, maar dat is dan wel een deal waaronder Iran heimelijk aan haar atoomprogramma verder kan werken.
 
RP
-------------

Last update - 17:47 30/05/2009       
Iran think tank: Ahmadinejad distorting facts about nuclear program
By The Associated Press
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1089011.html
 
 
A moderate think tank led by Iran's former top nuclear negotiator accused President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of distorting facts about the country's nuclear program to depict himself as a hero and improve his chances in the upcoming election.
 
It is rare for an Iranian think tank to criticize the president in such a direct manner, indicating the high stakes ahead of the June 12 election.
 
Ahmadinejad faces a tough battle against reformists who have criticized him for spending too much time slamming the West instead of improving Iran's faltering economy. The president has attempted to deflect the blame by playing up Iran's nuclear achievements during his time in office.
 
But the Center for Strategic Research, led by former nuclear negotiator Hasan Rowhani, said Ahmadinejad has attempted to downplay the role of his predecessors in developing Iran's nuclear program, which was started in the 1980s under former Prime Minister Mir Hossein Mousavi, the president's leading election challenger.
 
It also accused Ahmadinejad of exaggerating his role in standing up to the West over a 2003 deal his reformist predecessor, Mohammad Khatami, reached with three European countries to temporarily suspend Iran's uranium enrichment program.
 
Ahmadinejad has called the deal, which was negotiated by Rowhani, disgraceful and said he restored Iran's dignity by resuming the country's enrichment program after he took office in 2005. But the think tank noted that Khatami actually reversed the freeze shortly before Ahmadinejad took office in response to international demands to permanently suspend the nuclear program.
 
"It's deploring that some historical facts have deliberately been distorted in the past four years," the group said in a statement issued Friday.
 
The 2003 deal with Britain, France and Germany was aimed at easing Western fears that Iran was seeking to build nuclear weapons - a charge that Tehran has denied. The think tank said Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei approved the deal, which it said was wise because it was temporary and saved Iran from UN punishment.
 
In contrast, the group said Ahmadinejad's hard-line policy has prompted the UN to impose three rounds of financial sanctions on Iran for failing to suspend uranium enrichment - a process that can produce fuel for a nuclear reactor or material for a bomb.
 
Iran first began enriching uranium under Ahmadinejad's leadership in Feb. 2006 and produced nuclear fuel for the first time in April of that year.
 
The think tank said Ahmadinejad's decision to dismiss the UN sanctions as worthless and torn bits of paper has only brought greater harm to Iran.
 
Rowhani has invited Ahmadinejad to debate Iran's nuclear policy, but the president has not yet responded.
 

Ephraim Katzir, 4de president Israël, overleden met 93 jaar

 
Israël verliest oude, intelligente, erudiete leiders en krijgt daar hoogst matige figuren voor terug. Een slechte en zorgelijke ontwikkeling.
 
Voor een biografie zie:  Ephraim Katchalski-Katzir
 
-----------
 
Last update - 22:41 30/05/2009    
Israel's fourth president Ephraim Katzir dies, aged 93
By The Associated Press
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1089023.html
 

Ephraim Katzir, Israel's fourth president and an internationally recognized biophysicist died Saturday at his home in Rehovot, several weeks after his 93rd birthday.
 
Katzir's 1973-1978 tenure spanned two seminal events in Israeli history: The 1973 Yom Kippur War and the historic visit of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat to Jerusalem in 1977.
 
He left the presidency after one term to return to scientific research, declining a second term due to his wife's illness.
 
"Ephraim Katzir was devoted to the state of Israel in all that he did and was a scientific pioneer," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement. "He also contributed to Israel's security, and his integrity and modesty set an example."
 
Born in Kiev in 1916, Katzir immigrated at age 6 with his family to British-ruled Palestine and studied biology at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, receiving his Ph.D. in 1941, according to his official biography on the Foreign Ministry Web site.
 
He served in the Haganah, the underground Jewish defense organization, where he helped to set up a military research and development unit that developed explosives, propellants and other munitions.
 
During the war that followed Israel's independence in 1948, he was appointed head of the military's science corps. He served as the Israeli military's chief scientist from 1966 to 1968, the Web site said.
 
Katzir was among the founders of Israel's renowned Weizmann Institute of Science and headed its biophysics department, where his work on synthetic protein models deepened understanding of the genetic code and immune responses.
 
Katzir was awarded the Israel Prize, the country's highest honor, in 1959 for his contribution to the natural sciences. He received the Japan Prize in 1985 for his work on immobilized enzymes used in oral antibiotics. In 1996, the former president was selected as the first Israeli to be invited to join the American Academy of Sciences.


Abbas verwacht in juli vooruitgang bij gesprekken met Israel

 
Abbas gedraagt zich als een ware overwinnaar, die de voorwaarden bepaalt waaraan de verliezer moet voldoen om tot vrede te komen.
Het wordt tijd dat Obama zich ook wat fermer uitlaat over de eisen waaraan de Palestijnen moeten voldoen, zoals een einde komt aan de ophitsing en de verering van terorristen. Dit zal het vertrouwen binnen Israel (en de bereidheid te doen wat de VS wil) vergroten en zo de kansen op vrede daadwerkelijk vergroten.
 
RP
-----------

Abbas expects progress in talks with Israel by early July

May. 30, 2009
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST

 

Two days after meeting with US President Barack Obama, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, visiting in Cairo, stated on Saturday that intense contacts were being held in order to look into the possibility of renewing negotiations with Israel.

"It will happen not within months, but weeks from now, meaning that by early July, something must happen," Abbas reportedly said in a press conference following his meeting with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, hinting that he expects the talks to commence shortly.

The Palestinian leader said the problem was that Israel has yet to establish clear positions on key issues, but that he understands "this will happen soon."

Talks would begin once Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's government established clear positions on the country's borders, the issue of Jerusalem and the West Bank settlements, Abbas said.

In his meeting with Mubarak, Abbas told the Egyptian leader that he believes the US administration is committed to stopping Jewish Settlement construction in the West Bank.

"We're not asking for anything new, just that the other side comply with what has already been agreed upon," Abbas stressed.

zondag 31 mei 2009

Amnesty International geeft Israel de schuld van falen staakt-het-vuren met Hamas


Deze beschuldiging was ook veelvuldig in onze media te horen, waarbij vaak niet werd vermeld dat Hamas een tunnel had gegraven onder de grens met Israel door om meer soldaten te kunnen ontvoeren, een duidelijke schending van het bestand. Ook werden tijdens het bestand, aanvankelijk sporadisch en later steeds vaker, nog raketten op Israel afgevuurd. Bovendien was mondeling afgesproken dat over een gevangenenruil verder zou worden onderhandeld, en Hamas zich daarbij flexibel op zou stellen. Voor Israel waren beide zaken: het bestand en een gevangenenruil, duidelijk gekoppeld, terwijl Hamas daarop tegen was. De afspraken die waren gemaakt, waren op sommige punten vaag (hoe ver zou Israel de grenzen openen en hoe flexibel zou Hamas zich opstellen?), en beide interpreteerden die op hun eigen manier. Ikzelf zou belangrijke zaken die je met een vijand regelt altijd op papier vastleggen, met handtekeningen en onder toezicht van een neutraal persoon, maar dit is het Midden-Oosten en het was wellicht het meest haalbare.
 
RP
-------------


The Jerusalem Post
May 28, 2009 0:08 | Updated May 28, 2009 7:59
Amnesty blames Israel for collapse of truce with Hamas
By JONNY PAUL. JERUSALEM POST CORRESPONDENT
LONDON
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1243346492782&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


In its 2009 annual report, formally released on Thursday, Amnesty International places sole blame on Israel for the breakdown in the cease-fire between Israel and Hamas that led to Operation Cast Lead.

The London-based organization accuses Israel of breaking the six-month cease-fire on November 4, 2008, when "Israeli forces killed six Palestinian militants."

Jerusalem-based research organization NGO Monitor said the report ignored Hamas violations.

"Hamas's highly visible preparations for resumed Palestinian aggression during the six-month cease-fire in 2008, including the preparation of a human-shields strategy, are entirely ignored," NGO Monitor said.

Amnesty also says the Israeli government is maintaining a "tight blockade" on Gaza as collective punishment for the "continuing detention" of St.-Sgt. Gilad Schalit in the Gaza Strip.

While the report acknowledges that the Red Cross has been denied access to Schalit, and makes reference to the indiscriminate rocket attacks on southern Israel, NGO Monitor said the report showed that Amnesty's activities on Israeli and Palestinian issues were "highly biased and lack credibility."

Subtitled "The state of the world's human rights," the report states that the Gaza smuggling tunnels are used to move food and fuel, but does not mention arms smuggling.

NGO Monitor also accused Amnesty of not giving context when it blames Israel for the plight of Gazans who are denied access to Israel hospitals. The report uses four examples of Palestinians who died after being denied entry to Israel, without mentioning the large number of Palestinians treated in Israeli hospitals.

"Amnesty's activities in the Middle East are totally divorced from reality and constitute a continued attack on the moral foundation of human rights," said Prof. Gerald Steinberg, NGO Monitor's executive director.

"The world's most prominent human rights organization continues to abuse this position to join the ideological campaign that seeks to single out Israel for condemnation, promote the Palestinian narrative, and erase the context of mass terror and aggression by Hamas."


Iran verhoogt capaciteit uraniumverrijking


Currently, Iran is only capable of slowly producing enriched uranium for reactors. But Iranian officials have said their long-term goal is for more than 50,000 centrifuges, which would give it the ability to produce high-grade nuclear material in a start-to-finish cycle of just weeks.
 
Voor het produceren van electriciteit is dat natuurlijk absoluut onnodig. Dit is dan ook het zoveelste bewijs dat Iran echt niet alleen uit is op kernenergie voor vreedzame doeleinden.
 
RP
------------

May 28, 2009 17:06 | Updated May 28, 2009 17:11
'Iran ups uranium enrichment capacity'
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1243346499172
By ASSOCIATED PRESS
TEHERAN, Iran
 
 
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said his country has boosted its capacity to enrich uranium, another sign of anti-Western defiance by the leader seeking re-election in a vote next month.

Ahmadinejad said last month that Iran had 7,000 centrifuges at its uranium enrichment facility in Natanz in central Iran. The figure marked a significant boost from the 6,000 centrifuges announced in February. In his latest comments, reported by the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency on Thursday, he did not give a specific new figure.
 
"Now we have more than 7,000 centrifuges and the West dare not threaten us," IRNA quoted Ahmadinejad as saying on a small radio station late Wednesday.
 
Ahmadinejad has made Iran's expanding nuclear program one of the centerpieces of his campaign for the June 12 elections and has struck an increasingly harsh tone against the United States and other countries calling for Iran to halt it uranium enrichment.
 
Iran's leaders say they will never give up nuclear technology and insist they seek only energy-producing reactors. The United States, Israel and other nations worry that Iran's enrichment facilities could eventually produce material for nuclear warheads.
 
There is broad consensus among Iranian voters on the nation's rights for a nuclear program. But Ahmadinejad's three challengers - a fellow hard-liner and two moderates - have questioned his uncompromising stances against the West and their offers of economic incentives in exchange for suspending uranium enrichment.
 
The centrifuges spin at supersonic speeds to remove impurities from uranium gas, which then goes through other steps to become nuclear fuel or, at higher enrichment levels, nuclear weapons material.
 
Earlier this year, Iran said it was using an upgraded centrifuge that produces enriched uranium at about double the rate of its original systems.
 
Currently, Iran is only capable of slowly producing enriched uranium for reactors. But Iranian officials have said their long-term goal is for more than 50,000 centrifuges, which would give it the ability to produce high-grade nuclear material in a start-to-finish cycle of just weeks.

Noord-Korea bereid wapens aan Al Qaeda te verkopen volgens experts


Of aan Syrië, of aan Iran, of aan Hezbollah of wie ook maar anti-Amerikaans is en ervoor wil betalen. Volgens sommige berichten waren in de nucleaire reactor in Syrië die Israel in september 2007 bombardeerde, op dat moment Noord-Koreanen aan het werk.
De Noordkoreaanse bom is een voorbeeld van hoe beperkt de kans op succes is van eindeloze onderhandelingen en dialoog. Hopelijk heeft men met Iran minder geduld. En hopelijk komt ook China nu eindelijk tot andere gedachten en houdt het sancties tegen beide landen niet meer eindeloos tegen.
 
RP
-----------

North Korea ready to sell nuclear weapons to al-Qaeda, expert warns

http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/05/north-korea-ready-to-sell-nuclear.html

 
            May 27 2009 By Bob Roberts 
 
            NORTH Korea is ready to sell nuclear bombs to al-Qaeda, experts warned yesterday.
 
            As the crisis over the rogue regime's nuclear bomb explosion deepened, former diplomats said there was a clear and present danger from the Pyongyang government.
 
            Graham Allison, former US defence minister under Bill Clinton, said the international community regularly underestimated North Korean leader Kim Jong Il's willingness to do the unexpected.
 
            Sanctions Allinson, now an expert on international affairs at Harvard University, said: "Could this guy believe he could sell a nuclear bomb to Osama bin Laden? Why not?"
 
            The warning came as North Korea said it was ready for war over the threat of sanctions from the United Nations.
 
            In a statement on the official news agency KCNA, the rogue regime said America was pursuing a "hostile policy", adding: "Our army and people are fully ready for battle against any reckless US attempt for a pre-emptive attack."
 
            South Korea said it would join US attempts to intercept North Korean ships which could be carrying nuclear weapons.
 
            North Korea said it would regard the move as an act of war. And it also fired two more test missiles to prove its readiness for conflict.
 
            UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon - a South Korean - said he was "most deeply disturbed" by the move.
 
            Yesterday, UN diplomats began work on a resolution to punish North Korea for its underground nuclear test.
 
            Diplomats said they were seeking "tough measures", including further sanctions.
 
            In an emergency session of the UN Security Council, countries condemned the latest test.
 
            The US ambassador to the UN Susan Rice said: "The US thinks that this is a grave violation of international law and a threat to regional and international peace and security."
 
            Blockade The UN will now have to decide how tough the sanctions will be.
 
            A blockade could spark military clashes in south east Asia and lead to a fullscale war. But failure to take action could encourage other states like Iran and Syria to develop nuclear weapons.
 
            Monday's nuclear bomb test came after North Korea walked away from long-runnindisarmament talks.
 
            The country agreed in 2007 to abandon its nuclear ambitions in return for aid and diplomatic concessions.
 
            But it accused the US, South Korea, Japan, China and Russia of failing to meet agreed obligations.

Kun je het verschil zien tussen een Jood en een Palestijn?

Adam Shurati, left, and Hadas Maor in the picture chosen for Suter's project


Een mooi project dat focust op de overeenkomsten tussen Joden en Palestijnen, en zo hopelijk bijdraagt aan het afbreken van vijandbeelden. Het roept herinneringen op aan het "
Face to Face" project van enkele jaren geleden, waarin enorme foto's met lachende gezichten van Israeli's en Palestijnen op de afscheidingsmuur en elders werden geplakt.

Wouter
_____________  


Last update - 19:23 30/05/2009
Can you tell the difference between an Israeli and a Palestinian?
By Dalia Karpel, Haaretz Correspondent
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1089016.html

 
The advertisement published in Haaretz in March read "Wanted: people who look alike," and promised NIS 8,000 to anyone that could locate someone who looked like one of the eight people featured in the advertisement.

What the advertisement didn't say, was that the eight people pictured were Palestinians.

The ad was made by Swiss artist Olivier Suter, as part of his project 'Enemies', which focused on the absurd ways people identify "the other".
The advertisement is similar to a project Suter performed in Belgium, which asked viewers if they could dfferentiate between Flemish and French speakers.

Out of the dozens of photos he received, Suter picked a photo of an Israeli girl and a Palestinian boy who looked alike. The girl is one Hadas Maor, whose photo was sent in by her father, geography professor Yehuda Keidar.

Keidar, a long-time supporter of a two-state solution said "[David] Ben-Gurion was right when he said 'The Palestinians are not our cousins, they're our brothers. Turns out, they could be twins."

The Palestinian boy is named Adam Shurati and he was none too pleased about his likeness to a girl, according to his mother Nancy. Adam was further dismayed when his mother took him to have his hair cut to look like Hadas'.

Nancy, who lives in Bet Hanina, called the project "amazing" and said that her son's resemblance to an Israel girl surprised her.

"The project is a work of art meant for all of us, not just for the sake of art," Suter said.

Suter's next "Enemies" project will take place in Rwanda and the Congo.
 
 

Assistent Arafat Umm Nasser: "Israel is de kanker van het Midden-Oosten"

 
Arafats voormalige 'office manager' over Arafats vrouw, zijn dood, en Israel.

---------------------------------------------------
 

Arafat's Former Office Manager "Umm Nasser":
Israel Is the Cancer of the Middle East and Should Be Uprooted Any Way Possible

MEMRI: No. 2124 - January 26, 2009
 

Following are excerpts from an interview with "Umm Nasser," Yasser Arafat's former office manager, which aired on Mihwar TV on January 26, 2009.

To view this clip, visit
www.memritv.org/clip/en/2124.htm

Interviewer: The IMF, which is an official international organization, declared that $10 million, out of a total of $900 million, went to Suha Arafat's accounts in Paris. The IMF also stated that she was spending huge amounts on herself - hundreds of thousands of dollars monthly - and the rest was going to her personal accounts.
"Umm Nasser": What I know for sure is that she receives a monthly stipend from brother Abu Mazen, as a pension to which she is entitled as Abu Ammar's widow. She gets a stipend for her monthly expenses, which she spends on herself, her daughters, and their life in exile. She receives a monthly allowance of $25,000. I know this for a fact.
 
Interviewer: This is according to the IMF. The prosecution in Paris is investigating the period of 2002-2003 - before the death of Abu Ammar.
"Umm Nasser": This is all I know about her and about her expenses.
[...]
 
Interviewer: Who killed Yasser Arafat?
"Umm Nasser": Israel and America. Sharon said to Bush, the greatest criminal: "What else can I do? We've already placed Abu Ammar under siege."
 
Interviewer: Did Sharon tell [Bush] to set the precise time for him to die?
"Umm Nasser": Yes. Bush gave him the okay. He said to Sharon: "Go ahead."
They did this by means of a virus, which is passed through physical contact.
 
Interviewer: Or through kisses.
"Umm Nasser": Yes, and he used to hug everybody.
 
Interviewer: I heard that former French president Chirac tried to get an antidote to treat Abu Ammar...
"Umm Nasser": They refused. Just like Hamas leader Khaled Mash'al - they did the same thing to him, and he almost died. King Hussein was holding an Israeli spy, and he said: "I will give you the spy if you send me the antidote for Khaled Mash'al."
 
Interviewer: But they refused...
"Umm Nasser": They brought him the antidote, and he is alive and well in Damascus.
 
Interviewer: But when it came to Yasser Arafat, they refused.
"Umm Nasser": That's right. They said: "We've already decided to finish him off." They besieged him.
 
Interviewer: But he was never sick - he never suffered from diabetes or blood pressure, did he?
"Umm Nasser": Never. The only thing he suffered from was a problem in his spine, because he used to fly a lot. There probably isn't a pilot anywhere in the world who flew as much as Abu Ammar.
[...]
The Palestinian people is the Jesus Christ of this world. It is being tormented.
 
Interviewer: It is the Jesus Christ of the world, but it is crucified forever.
"Umm Nasser": His brothers... Blood is not water. The day will come, and there will be another Abd Al-Nasser or Abu Ammar, who will believe in the Arab nation and in its solidarity. They will help the people and alleviate their suffering. It's painful, and it is because of the cancer spreading in our Arab nation - Israel. We need to uproot this cancer any way we can. When they find a cure for cancer, Allah will give us a cure to rid ourselves of the Israeli cancer.

 
==========================
For assistance, please contact MEMRI at
memri@memri.org. The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request.

MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution.

MEMRI
P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837
Phone: (202) 955-9070
Fax: (202) 955-9077
www.memri.org

Abbas wacht op Hamas en Israel om toe te geven


Met zijn constante eenzijdige gehamer op de nederzettingen als het probleem, geeft Obama de Arabieren en Palestijnen een duidelijke boodschap: jullie hoeven niks te doen. Zolang Israel niet geheel stopt met bouwen in de nederzettingen, zolang het niet alle buitenposten ontruimt, en aan nog een aantal eisen voldoet, kunnen jullie rustig afwachten. Of dat de bedoeling is weet ik niet, maar het is wel het signaal dat Abbas heeft opgevangen.
 
Ondertussen gaat de verering van zelfmoordterroristen door de Palestijnse Autoriteit gewoon door, en leren kinderen dat het doden van Israelische (zeg maar Joodse) burgers een goede zaak is.
 
RP
------------
 
Abbas's Waiting Game
By Jackson Diehl
Friday, May 29, 2009
 
 
Mahmoud Abbas says there is nothing for him to do.

True, the Palestinian president walked into his meeting with Barack Obama yesterday as the pivotal player in any Middle East peace process. If there is to be a deal, Abbas must (1) agree on all the details of a two-state settlement with the new Israeli government of Binyamin Netanyahu, which hasn't yet accepted Palestinian statehood, and (2) somehow overcome the huge split in Palestinian governance between his Fatah movement, which controls the West Bank, and Hamas, which rules Gaza and hasn't yet accepted Israel's right to exist.

Yet on Wednesday afternoon, as he prepared for the White House meeting in a suite at the Ritz-Carlton in Pentagon City, Abbas insisted that his only role was to wait. He will wait for Hamas to capitulate to his demand that any Palestinian unity government recognize Israel and swear off violence. And he will wait for the Obama administration to force a recalcitrant Netanyahu to freeze Israeli settlement construction and publicly accept the two-state formula.

Until Israel meets his demands, the Palestinian president says, he will refuse to begin negotiations. He won't even agree to help Obama's envoy, George J. Mitchell, persuade Arab states to take small confidence-building measures. "We can't talk to the Arabs until Israel agrees to freeze settlements and recognize the two-state solution," he insisted in an interview. "Until then we can't talk to anyone."

For veterans of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, Abbas's bargaining position will be bone-wearyingly familiar: Both sides invariably begin by arguing that they cannot act until the other side offers far-reaching concessions. Netanyahu suggested during his own visit to Washington last week that the Palestinians should start by recognizing Israel as a Jewish state, though he didn't make it a precondition for meeting with Abbas.

What's interesting about Abbas's hardline position, however, is what it says about the message that Obama's first Middle East steps have sent to Palestinians and Arab governments. From its first days the Bush administration made it clear that the onus for change in the Middle East was on the Palestinians: Until they put an end to terrorism, established a democratic government and accepted the basic parameters for a settlement, the United States was not going to expect major concessions from Israel.

Obama, in contrast, has repeatedly and publicly stressed the need for a West Bank settlement freeze, with no exceptions. In so doing he has shifted the focus to Israel. He has revived a long-dormant Palestinian fantasy: that the United States will simply force Israel to make critical concessions, whether or not its democratic government agrees, while Arabs passively watch and applaud. "The Americans are the leaders of the world," Abbas told me and Post Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt. "They can use their weight with anyone around the world. Two years ago they used their weight on us. Now they should tell the Israelis, 'You have to comply with the conditions.' "

It's true, of course, that if Obama is to broker a Middle East settlement he will have to overcome the recalcitrance of Netanyahu and his Likud party, which has not yet reconciled itself to the idea that Israel will have to give up most of the West Bank and evacuate tens of thousands of settlers. But Palestinians remain a long way from swallowing reality as well. Setting aside Hamas and its insistence that Israel must be liquidated, Abbas -- usually described as the most moderate of Palestinian leaders -- last year helped doom Netanyahu's predecessor, Ehud Olmert, by rejecting a generous outline for Palestinian statehood.

In our meeting Wednesday, Abbas acknowledged that Olmert had shown him a map proposing a Palestinian state on 97 percent of the West Bank -- though he complained that the Israeli leader refused to give him a copy of the plan. He confirmed that Olmert "accepted the principle" of the "right of return" of Palestinian refugees -- something no previous Israeli prime minister had done -- and offered to resettle thousands in Israel. In all, Olmert's peace offer was more generous to the Palestinians than either that of Bush or Bill Clinton; it's almost impossible to imagine Obama, or any Israeli government, going further.

Abbas turned it down. "The gaps were wide," he said.

Abbas and his team fully expect that Netanyahu will never agree to the full settlement freeze -- if he did, his center-right coalition would almost certainly collapse. So they plan to sit back and watch while U.S. pressure slowly squeezes the Israeli prime minister from office. "It will take a couple of years," one official breezily predicted. Abbas rejects the notion that he should make any comparable concession -- such as recognizing Israel as a Jewish state, which would imply renunciation of any large-scale resettlement of refugees.

Instead, he says, he will remain passive. "I will wait for Hamas to accept international commitments. I will wait for Israel to freeze settlements," he said. "Until then, in the West Bank we have a good reality . . . the people are living a normal life." In the Obama administration, so far, it's easy being Palestinian.

 

Israëli's kwaad over Abbas' poging Netanjahoe via Obama onder druk te zetten


Abbas also told the Washington Post that former prime minister Ehud Olmert accepted the principle of a "right of return" to Israel for Palestinian refugees and offered to resettle thousands of Palestinians in Israel. He said Olmert proposed a Palestinian state on 97 percent of the West Bank, and showed him its contours on a map.
 
Waarom stelt niemand kritische vragen aan Abbas over de afwijzing van dit genereuze aanbod? Omgekeerd kan Netanjahoe daarvan leren: hij kan de Palestijnen een dergelijk aanbod doen, wetende dat ze het toch weer zullen afwijzen, en zich zo wel als gematigd positioneren.

RP
----------------

Israel fumes as Abbas uses US visit to undermine Netanyahu

May. 31, 2009
Haviv Rettig Gur , THE JERUSALEM POST

 

Senior Israeli officials were dismissive and defiant on Saturday night, following Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas's visit to Washington, highlighted by a report in which PA officials said the leadership is waiting for US pressure to bring down the Netanyahu government.

The report in Friday's Washington Post came a day after Abbas's White House meeting with US President Barack Obama.

"It will take a couple of years" for this American pressure to force Netanyahu from office, the Washington Post quoted one of Abbas's officials as saying, presumably bringing opposition head Tzipi Livni to power.

"With all due respect to the United States, our strategic ally, we are an independent democratic country, and our political leadership is chosen by internal democratic processes," coalition chairman and Likud MK Ze'ev Elkin said on Saturday night.

A senior government official recalled former foreign minister Abba Eban's declaration that the Palestinians "never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. Let that not happen this time as well."

"It would be a pity if the Palestinian leadership threw away the very real chance that exists to move forward with this Israeli government on our proposed three-track approach of political, economic and security issues. If they decide they don't want to work to move the process forward, they'll have no one to blame but themselves," the official added.

According to the report, Abbas and his leadership believe the government would likely fall if Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu surrendered to American demands for a total freeze on construction in West Bank settlements.

"If it is true that Abu Mazen [Abbas] believes Livni will be a more comfortable negotiating partner for the Palestinians, then it shows the wisdom of the Israeli voter, who decided to place someone else in charge," Elkin declared.

He insisted the government was stable - "I think every member of the coalition is responsible enough to enable this government to last its appointed term" - and that it would not easily give in to American demands.

"Our experience with American dictates in the very recent past has not been a good one," he said. "It was the United States that insisted on allowing Hamas to run in the Palestinian elections. I don't think this government will very easily cave to demands that are not carefully considered and responsible, no matter how much we value our strategic partnership with the United States."

Abbas was interviewed the day before his Thursday meeting with the US president, during which Obama reiterated his calls on Israel "to stop the settlements, to make sure that we are stopping the building of outposts, to work with the Palestinian Authority in order to alleviate some of the pressures that the Palestinian people are under in terms of travel and commerce."

Setting out what the newspaper called "a hardline position," the Palestinian leader conditioned a resumption of talks with Israel on Netanyahu's agreement to a halt in all settlement building and formal Israeli government acceptance of Palestinian statehood.

Abbas added that he would not even assist Obama's special envoy, George Mitchell, in trying to encourage Arab states to begin warming relations with Israel until Israel accepted these conditions.

"We can't talk to the Arabs until Israel agrees to freeze settlements and recognizes the two-state solution," Abbas was quoted as saying. "Until then, we can't talk to anyone."

However, the Washington Post went on, "Abbas and his team fully expect that Netanyahu will never agree to the full settlement freeze - if he did, his center-right coalition would almost certainly collapse. So they plan to sit back and watch while US pressure slowly squeezes the Israeli prime minister from office.

"'It will take a couple of years,' one official breezily predicted."

Abbas "rejects the notion that he should make any comparable concession - such as recognizing Israel as a Jewish state, which would imply renunciation of any large-scale resettlement of refugees," the article continued.

Abbas intends to remain passive, he told the paper.

"I will wait for Hamas to accept international commitments. I will wait for Israel to freeze settlements… Until then, in the West Bank we have a good reality... The people are living a normal life."

Abbas also told the Washington Post that former prime minister Ehud Olmert accepted the principle of a "right of return" to Israel for Palestinian refugees and offered to resettle thousands of Palestinians in Israel. He said Olmert proposed a Palestinian state on 97 percent of the West Bank, and showed him its contours on a map.

Abbas said he turned down Olmert's peace offer because "the gaps were too wide."

"What's interesting about Abbas's hardline position," wrote the Washington Post's Jackson Diehl, who conducted the interview along with a colleague, "is what it says about the message that Obama's first Middle East steps have sent to Palestinians and Arab governments."

While the Bush administration placed the onus for change in the Middle East on the Palestinians, Diehl wrote, the Obama administration had shifted the focus to Israel.

The upshot is that "in the Obama administration, so far, it's easy being Palestinian," Diehl wrote.

Under George W. Bush, the Palestinians knew that "until they put an end to terrorism, established a democratic government and accepted the basic parameters for a settlement, the United States was not going to expect major concessions from Israel," wrote Diehl.

But Obama, with his repeated demands for a settlement freeze, "has revived a long-dormant Palestinian fantasy: that the United States will simply force Israel to make critical concessions, whether or not its democratic government agrees, while Arabs passively watch and applaud."

Diehl wrote that Netanyahu and the Likud Party had not reconciled themselves "to the idea that Israel will have to give up most of the West Bank and evacuate tens of thousands of settlers" for a permanent accord.

"But Palestinians remain a long way from swallowing reality as well," he added. "Setting aside Hamas and its insistence that Israel must be liquidated, Abbas - usually described as the most moderate of Palestinian leaders - last year helped doom Netanyahu's predecessor, Ehud Olmert, by rejecting a generous outline for Palestinian statehood."

Olmert's offer "was more generous to the Palestinians than either that of Bush or Bill Clinton," wrote Diehl. "It's almost impossible to imagine Obama, or any Israeli government, going further."

Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman's spokesman Tzahi Moshe confirmed on Saturday night that the foreign minister would go to Russia and Belarus on Monday for talks "that are part of the special strategic connection which the minister believes Israel has with Russia."

In Moscow, Lieberman will meet with President Dmitri Medvedev, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, "and will discuss many issues, including Iran and the strengthening of Israel's relationship with 'Eastern bloc' countries," Moshe said.

Jerusalem Post staff contributed to this report.

_____________________________

Benny Morris: 'One State, Two States' (boekrecensie door Ami Isseroff)

 
Hieronder het begin van een boekbespreking door Ami Isseroff van Benny Morris' One State, Two States: Resolving the Israel/Palestine Conflict.
Voor de gehele boekbespreking zie op MidEastWeb:
Book Review: Benny Morris, One State, Two States
 
Twee eerdere besprekingen zijn op onze website geplaatst:
 
Zie ook over de staat van het vredesproces en de rol van links in Israel:

_________________________


Book Review: Benny Morris, One State, Two States

05/29/2009

Benny Morris
One State, Two States,
Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 2009, 240 pp
ISBN 9780300122817

Almost any book about the Middle East by Benny Morris has to be an important book, and this one is both important and timely. The Obama administration is pressing for a "Two State solution" and the Arab states are at least saying they are committed to such a solution. At the same time, there were two conferences dedicated to a "One state solution" or alternative to the "two state solution. One conference was held by right wing Zionists, and one by anti-Zionists, each pushing "solutions" that will basically obliterate the other side.

Morris traces the history of various "solutions" proposed for the conflict between the Jews and Arabs in Palestine. He shows that the various binational and cantonal solution never really had any support and are unworkable. He shows that all the "one state" solutions are fraudulent illusions, based on the underlying conviction that the land belongs to them, and the notion that it is possible to sell foreigners on dubious ideas such as the "Secular Democratic State" - an entity that does not exist, and could not exist in the Middle East. He likewise shows the very great difficulties in the way of a two state solution. It is hard to fit two little states in a tiny area about the size of New Jersey, with inadequate water supplies, and with one of the states split in two by about 50 KM of desert. The land from the river to the sea is a geographic unity he argues. The water supply of the coast depends on the West Bank, and Palestinian sewage flows into Israel on the rivers. The 2000 square mile Palestinian state would not be large enough to absorb all the Palestinian refugees. These are all important arguments, to be sure.

But then Morris proposes his own favorite solution, that the land of the West Bank will become part of Jordan:

.... a partition of Palestine into Israel, more or less along its pre-1967 borders, and an Arab state, call it Palestinian-Jordanian, that fuses the bulk of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and the east bank, the present-day Kingdom of Jordan.

Morris neglects to say what government there would be in Gaza, but he does say that the large area of the Palestinian-Jordanian state would allow for resettlement of the Gaza refugees there.

Alone among the proffered ideas, this one is not really analyzed critically. There are three obvious objections. The first is that if the land is a geographic unit as Morris states, given the West Bank and Gaza to Jordanian administration is not any better than dividing it between Israelis and Palestinians. The second is that the "Jordanian option" is as dead as the binational state and the "One State Solution." In fact, when the very same option was raised at the recent Knesset conference on alternatives to the two state solution, and an Israeli MK proposed a bill that would give Palestinians Jordanian citizenship, the Jordanian Foreign Ministry was quick to summon the Israeli ambassador and express its extreme displeasure:

Nasser Judeh issued a strong protest to the ambassador "over a debate in the Knesset on a motion on a so-called two states for the two people on the two banks of the Jordan River."

Judeh said Jordan was "dismayed by the debate and categorically and totally rejected the proposal submitted by a Knesset member, calling on the Israeli government for a clear explanation of what took place in the Knesset."

. It is indeed not clear why Israelis busy themselves with handing out citizenship in other peoples' countries and trying to decide the future of their neighbors for them, or what good anyone thinks can come of such debates. The proposed union of Palestine with Jordan would deprive the Jordanians of their kingdom. It would create a large Palestinian controlled state next to Israel. If Benny Morris is right that the irredentism of the Palestinian Arabs is implacable, this state would have every motivation to attack Israel, and a much better chance of succeeding than the tiny Palestinian state proposed in the two state solution. There is also the little matter of what happens to Gaza. Perhaps it will be evacuated and turned over to Israel in a territorial swap, which would leave the Palestinian-Jordanian state with no port on the Mediterranean, or perhaps it will be incorporated into Egypt, an idea that the Egyptians have rejected, or perhaps it will be part of the Palestinian-Jordanian state, a proposal that is bound to meet strenuous objections from Egypt. Thus, the only conclusion is that the "Jordanian option" is just as problematic as any other.

Continued here: http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000760.htm

=================

Original text copyright by the author and MidEastWeb for Coexistence, RA. Posted at MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log at http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000760.htm where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Distributed by MEW Newslist. Subscribe by e-mail to mew-subscribe@yahoogroups.com. Please forward by email with this notice and link to and cite this article. Other uses by permission.

Fransman richt eerste anti-Zionistische partij op

 
Een expliciet antizionistische partij in Europa, waar is die in hemelsnaam voor nodig? Los van het feit dat antizionisme een verwerpelijke ideologie is, omdat zij de legitimiteit van de nationale beweging en de rechten van het meest vervolgde volk ontkent, zijn er al genoeg antizionistische partijen. Als je alle partijen die sancties tegen Israel bepleiten om het eenzijdig onder druk te zetten tot het doen van allerlei concessies, alle partijen die menen dat Hamas pragmatisch is geworden en zij een constructieve bijdrage aan het vredesproces kan leveren, alle partijen die Israel telkens eenzijdig veroordelen voor militair optreden maar de ogen sluiten voor Palestijnse raketten, aanslagen en de continue dreiging van terreur in Israel, als je al die partijen uitsluit is het niet meer mogelijk om links van het midden te stemmen.
 
Uit dit initiatief blijkt ook hoe antizionisme als dekmantel voor antisemitisme wordt gebruikt. Zeg maar de moderne versie van de eind 19e eeuw in Duitsland opgerichte Antisemitenbond.
 
RP
--------------
 

Dieudonné richt eerste anti-Zionistische partij op

Maandag 23 Maart 2009 13:21

 

Aanzetten tot Jodenhaat of antisemitisme is in alle Europese landen bij wet verboden Dat is echter niet het geval voor het anti-Zionisme. Vandaar dat antisemieten in de islamitische wereld het woord Jood al langer vervangen door de term Zionist. Dieudonné M'bala M'Bala, geboren in 1963 in een voorstad van Parijs, heeft een nieuwe partij opgericht die in de eerste plaats wil strijden tegen het Zionisme. Zijn vader is afkomstig uit Kameroen, zijn moeder is een Franse. De vader is moslim, de moeder bekeerde zich tot de islam, na haar huwelijk

De Franse komiek, die in het verleden werd veroordeeld voor antisemitisme, wil met zijn nieuwe anti-Zionistische partij deelnemen aan de komende Europese verkiezingen van 7 juni. De komiek is van oordeel dat hij en een deel van de Franse bevolking "als slaven onder een zionistisch regime leven".

In de jaren '90 werd Dieudonné nog volop gerespecteerd in Frankrijk en behoorde hij tot de groep van zogenaamde Linkse intellectuelen en artiesten. Vandaag geldt hij eerder als extreemrechts en is hij vaak aanwezig op feestjes van Jean Marie Le Pen en Bruno Gollnisch Dieudonné werd meermaals veroordeeld, in 2004 voor zijn beweringen dat de Joden zich verrijkt hadden door de slavernij. En in 2006 voor zijn uitlatingen over de Shoah.

Dieudonné maakt nu dus handig gebruik van een politieke partij om zijn hatelijkheden ongestraft te verkondigen. Hij vindt dat de standpunten van het extreem-rechtse Front National over Israël te soft zijn en zegt dat kiezers het recht hebben om te kunnen stemmen op een partij die zonder schroom uitkomt voor haar standpunten.

De waarschuwende woorden van voormalig premier Yves Leterme over het gevaar van een antisemitisme dat zich aandient in de vermomming van anti-zionisme blijken zonder meer profetisch te zijn.

 

De Joodse Nakba

 
Bij de Nakba wordt altijd aan de Palestijnse vluchtelingen gedacht, maar de vlucht van Joden uit de Arabische wereld wordt doorgaans vergeten of anders afgedaan als zionistische propaganda.
 
Dit artikel laat zien dat dit niet het gevolg was van het zionisme, en dat het beeld dat de Joden voor die tijd vreedzaam met de Arabieren samen leefden, een mythe is.

Research that was conducted, among others, by Prof. Irwin Cotler, former Minister of Justice of Canada, shows that the Arab League formulated a bill that would place a series of sanctions on the Jews, including confiscation of property, bank accounts and more. The preamble to the bill states that "All Jews will be considered members of the Jewish minority in the State of Palestine." And if the fate of the Jews of Palestine was sealed, the fate of the Jews in Arab countries was clear.

The bill was indeed the background to the sanctions against the Jews in Arab countries − sometimes by way of legislation, as happened in Iraq and later in Egypt, and sometimes by taking those measures without the need for any legislation.

Het zionisme was dus niet de oorzaak van de problemen, zoals vaak beweerd, en als de Joden in Palestina niet hadden gezegevierd was het de Joden in de Arabische wereld niet beter vergaan.

RP
---------------

The Jewish Nakba

http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/001031.html

Expulsions, Massacres and Forced Conversions

By Ben-Dror Yemini
Ma'ariv
May 16, 2009

They say that she was stunningly beautiful. Sol (Suleika) Hatuel was 17 years old when she was beheaded. A Muslim friend claimed that she had succeeded in converting her. When Sol denied the claim, she was accused of renouncing Islam and was condemned to death. Her case reached the sultan.

In order to prevent her death, the community elders tried to persuade her to live as a Muslim. She refused and said, "I was born as a Jew, I will die as a Jew." Her fate was sealed. It happened in 1834. She was from Tangier and was executed in Fez. Many make pilgrimages to her grave. Despite the fact that the incident was immortalized in eyewitness testimony, in a famous painting and in a play, her story has been forgotten. The following article is dedicated to her and to the victims of the Jewish Nakba.

***

Every year on the 15th of May, the Palestinians − and many others around the world along with them − "celebrate" Nakba Day. For them, this is the day that marks the great catastrophe that befell them as result of the establishment of the State of Israel. Hundreds of thousands of Arabs became refugees. Some fled, some were deported. The Nakba grew to such enormous proportions that it is preventing a solution to the dispute.

We must remember that in the 1940s, population exchanges and deportations for the purpose of creating national states were the accepted norm. Tens of millions of people experienced it, but only the Palestinians (and they are not alone in this) have been inflating the myth of the Nakba.

However, there is another Nakba: the Jewish Nakba. During those same years, there was a long line of slaughters, pogroms, property confiscation of and deportations − against Jews in Islamic countries. This chapter of history has been left in the shadows. The Jewish Nakba was worse than the Palestinian Nakba. The only difference is that the Jews did not turn that Nakba into their founding ethos. To the contrary.

Like tens of millions of other refugees around the world, they preferred to heal the wound. Not to scratch it and not to open it and not to make it bleed even more. The Palestinians, in contrast, preferred bleeding to rehabilitation. And now they are also paying the price.

The industry of lies has intensified the myth of the Nakba and turned it into the ultimate crime. The Nakba has spawned innumerable publications and conferences, to the point of completely distorting the actual historical process. The Deir Yassin massacre has become one of the milestones in the Palestinian Nakba. There is no need to hide what occurred there (even though the issue of the massacre is in dispute). Innocent people were killed. There were a few other instances of behavior that should be exposed and condemned.

EXTERMINATION WAR AGAINST THE JEWS

A long series of massacres was perpetrated against the Jews in Arab countries. They did not declare war on the countries in which they lived. They were loyal citizens. That did not help them. Their suffering was erased. Their story is never told. The Palestinian narrative has taken over history. There is no need for a Palestinian narrative versus a Zionist narrative. We need to shake off narratives in favor of the truth. And the truth is the number of Jews murdered was greater, their dispossession was greater, and their suffering greater...

A stunning testimonial from those years, which actually comes from the Arab side, sheds light on the issue. In 1936, Alawite notables sent a letter to the French Foreign Minister in which they expressed their concern for the future of the region. They also referred to the Jewish question: "The Jews brought civilization and peace to the Arab Muslims, and they dispersed gold and prosperity over Palestine without damage to anyone or taking anything by force. Despite this, the Muslims declared holy war against them and didn't hesitate to massacre their children and women … Thus, a black fate awaits the Jews in case the Mandates are cancelled and Muslim Syria united with Muslim Palestine". The interesting thing is that one of the letter's signatories was none other than the great grandfather of Bashar Al Assad, the president of Syria.

We must remember that Nakba Day is the date of the declaration of Israel's independence, May 15th. We must remember what happened just a few hours after that declaration. The Secretary of the Arab League, Abdul Rahman Hassan Azzamaha, announced the declaration of war against Israel: "This war will be a war of annihilation and the story of the slaughter will be told like the campaigns of the Mongols and the Crusaders."

The Mufti, Haj Amin Al Husseini, who was close to Hitler during the Second World War, added his own bit: "I am declaring a holy war. My brother Muslims! Slaughter the Jews! Kill them all!" The mini-Holocaust of the Jews in Arab countries.

Various documents, some of them discovered only in recent years, show that the declaration of war was far broader. It was actually a declaration of war on the Jews.

Research that was conducted, among others, by Prof. Irwin Cotler, former Minister of Justice of Canada, shows that the Arab League formulated a bill that would place a series of sanctions on the Jews, including confiscation of property, bank accounts and more. The preamble to the bill states that "All Jews will be considered members of the Jewish minority in the State of Palestine." And if the fate of the Jews of Palestine was sealed, the fate of the Jews in Arab countries was clear.

The bill was indeed the background to the sanctions against the Jews in Arab countries − sometimes by way of legislation, as happened in Iraq and later in Egypt, and sometimes by taking those measures without the need for any legislation.

According to the industry of lies, the Jews in Arab countries lived peacefully in their environment, under the protection of the government, and it was only because of the Zionist movement and the harm done to the Arabs in Palestine that the Jews began to suffer.

This lie has been repeated innumerable times. Most of the Jews in Arab countries did not undergo the horrors of the Holocaust. But, even before the advent of Zionism, their situation was not any better. There were periods in which the Jews enjoyed relative peace under Muslim rule, but those periods were the exception. Throughout Jewish history in Muslim lands there were humiliations, expulsions, pogroms and a systematic deprivation of rights.

SERIES OF POGROMS

We can, of course, start with the conflict between Muhammad and the Jews. Muhammed undertook social reforms, bringing the Arabs out of the Jahaliya period, and borrowed the concept of monotheism - primarily, perhaps, from the Jews. Many motifs from the Jewish religion appear in the Koran, for example, circumcision and the prohibition on eating pork. But Muhammad wanted to convert the Jews, They, of course, refused. The result was a confrontation that ended in the expulsion and slaughter of hundreds.

The Jews, as the "People of the Book," were given the right to live under the protection of Islam and to practice their religion. From time to time, from generation to generation, the conditions underwent changes. In many cases, the Jews lived under the covenant of Khalif Omar.

This covenant enabled them to live as protected people ("Dhimmis"), albeit with inferior status. But many times, under Muslim rule, they were not even allowed a life of inferior status.

THE GOLDEN AGE

One of the proofs of the coexistence of Jews and Muslims is Jewish prosperity under Muslim rule in Spain and the Golden Age. The reality, however, was different.

It encompassed continued violence against the Jews. In 1011 in Cordoba, Spain, under Muslim rule, there were pogroms in which, according to various estimates, from hundreds to thousands were murdered. In 1066 in Granada, Yosef Hanagid was executed, along with between 4,000 and 6,000 other Jews. One of the worst periods of all began in 1148, when the Almohad dynasty came to power (al Muwahhidūn), and ruled Spain and North Africa during the 12th and 13th centuries.

MOROCCO

Morocco was the Arab country that suffered from the worst series of massacres of Jews. In the 8th century whole communities were wiped out by Idris the First. In 1033, in the city of Fez, 6,000 Jews were murdered by a Muslim mob. The rise of the Almohad dynasty caused waves of mass murders. According to testimony from that time, 100,000 Jews were slaughtered in Fez and about 120,000 in Marrakesh (this testimony should be viewed with caution). In 1465, another massacre took place in Fez, which spread to other cities in Morocco.

There were pogroms in Tetuan in 1790 and 1792, in which children were murdered, women were raped and property was looted. Between 1864 and 1880, there were a series of pogroms against the Jews of Marrakesh, in which hundreds were slaughtered. In 1903, there were pogroms in two cities – Taza and Settat, in which over 40 Jews were killed.

In 1907, there was a pogrom in Casablanca in which 30 Jews were killed and many women were raped. In 1912, there was another massacre in Fez in which 60 Jews were killed and about 10,000 were left homeless. In 1948, another series of pogroms began against the Jews which led to the slaughter of 42 in the cities of Oujda and Jrada.

ALGERIA

A series of massacres occurred in Algeria in 1805, 1815 and 1830. The situation of the Jews improved with the start of the French conquest in 1830, but that did not prevent anti-Jewish outbursts in the 1880s. The situation deteriorated again with the rise of the Vichy government. Even before 1934, the country was permeated by Nazi influences, which led to the slaughter of 25 Jews in the city of Constantine. When it achieved independence in 1962, laws were passed against citizenship for anyone who was not a Muslim and their property was effectively confiscated. Most of the Jews left, usually completely penniless, together with the French ("pieds noirs").

LIBYA

In 1785, hundreds of Libyan Jews were murdered by Burza Pasha. Under Nazi influence, harassment of the Jews intensified. Jewish property in Benghazi was plundered, thousands were sent to camps and about 500 Jews were killed. In 1945, at the end of World War II, a program against the Jews began and the number of murdered reached 140. The New York Times reported the horrible scenes of babies and old people who had been beaten to death. In the riots that broke out in 1948, the Jews were more prepared, so only 14 were killed. Following the Six Day War, riots broke out once again and 17 Jews were slaughtered.

IRAQ

A massacre occurred in Basra in 1776. The situation of the Iraqi Jews improved under British rule in 1917, but this improvement ended with Iraq's independence in 1932. German influences increased and reached a peak in 1941 in the pogrom known as Farhud, in which 182 Jews were slaughtered (according to historian Elie Kedourie, 600 people were actually murdered) and thousands of houses were pillaged.

Those were the days of Haj Amin al Husseini, who preached violence against the Jews. After the establishment of the State of Israel, the Iraqi parliament acted according to the Arab League bill and in 1950 and froze the assets of Jews. Sanctions were imposed on those who remained in Iraq. The Farhud massacre and the harassment from 1946 to 1949 to all intents and purposes turned the Iraqi Jews into exiles and refugees. The few thousand who remained in Iraq suffered from harsh edicts. In 1967, 14 Iraqis were sentenced to death on trumped up charges of espionage. Among them were 11 Jews. Radio Iraq invited the masses to the hanging festivities.

SYRIA

The first blood libel in a Muslim country occurred in Syria in 1840, and led to the kidnapping and torture of dozens of Jewish children, sometimes to the point of death, and a pogrom against the Jews. In 1986, the Syrian Minister of Defense, Mustafa Talas, published a book, "The Matzah of Zion," in which he claims that the Jews did, indeed, use the blood of a Christian monk to bake matzah. Same old anti-Semitism, new edition. Other pogroms occurred in Aleppo in 1850 and in 1875, in Damascus in 1848 and in 1890, in Beirut in 1862 and in 1874, and in Dir al Kamar there was another blood libel which also led to a pogrom in 1847. That year, there was a pogrom against the Jews of Jerusalem, which was the result of that blood libel. In 1945, the Jews of Aleppo suffered severe pogroms. 75 Jews were murdered and the community was destroyed. There was a resurgence of the violence in 1947, which turned most of the Syrian Jews into refugees. Those who remained there lived for many years as hostages.

IRAN

There was a pogrom against the Jews of Mashhad in Iran in 1839. A mob was incited to attack Jews, and slaughtered almost 40. The rest were forced to convert. That is how the Marranos of Mashhad came into being. In 1910, there was a blood libel in Shiraz in which 30 Jews were murdered and all Jewish homes were pillaged.

YEMEN

There were fluctuations in relations in Yemen that ranged between tolerance and inferior subsistence, between harassment and pogroms. The Rambam's Letter to Yemen was sent following a letter he received from the leader of the Yemeni Jews, describing edicts of forced conversion issued against the Jews (1173). There were further waves of apostasy edicts which cannot be detailed here for lack of space.

One of the worst milestones was the Mawza exile. Three years after Imam Al Mahdi took power in 1676, he drove the Jews into one of the most arid districts of Yemen. According to various accounts, 60 - 75% of the Jews died as a result of the exile. Many and varied edicts were imposed on the Jews, differing only in severity. One of the harshest was the Orphans' Edict, which ordered the forced conversion of orphaned children to Islam. In nearby Aden, which was under British rule, pogroms occurred in 1947 which took the lives of 82 Jews. 106 of the 170 shops that were owned by Jews were completely destroyed. Hundreds of houses and all the community's buildings were burned down.

EGYPT

As in the other Arab countries, the Jews of Egypt also suffered inferior status for hundreds of years. A significant improvement occurred when Muhammad Ali came to power in 1805. The testimony of French diplomat, Edmond Combes, leaves nothing in doubt: "To the Muslims, no race is more worthy of contempt than the Jewish race." Another diplomat added, "The Muslims do not hate any other religion the way they hate that of the Jews."

Following the blood libel in Damascus, similar libels began to spread in Egypt as well and incited mobs to carry out a series of attacks: in Cairo in 1844, 1890, and in 1901-1902; and Alexandria in 1870, 1882 and in 1901-1907. Similar attacks also occurred in Port Said and in Damanhur.

Later on, there were riots against the Jews at the end of World War II, in 1945, in which 10 were killed and hundreds were injured. In 1947, the Companies Law was passed, which severely damaged Jewish businesses and led to the confiscation of property. In 1948, following the UN resolution on partition, riots began in Cairo and Alexandria. The dead numbered between 80 and 180. Tens of thousands were forced to leave, many fleeing and abandoning their property. The lot of those who remained did not improve. In 1956, a law was passed in Egypt which effectively denied the Jews citizenship, forcing them to leave the country with no property. This was an act of pure expulsion and mass property confiscation.

***

The above is just a partial list out of a long series of massacres in Muslim countries. It happened before the Zionist endeavor. It continued with the Zionist endeavor. We are talking about a succession of events. Tens of thousands were murdered simply because they were Jewish. So the fairytale of coexistence and blaming Zionism for undermining that coexistence is yet another completely baseless myth.

Before the UN vote on partition in November 1947, Egypt's ambassador to the UN, Heykal Pasha, warned that "The lives of a million Jews in Muslim countries will be in danger if the vote is for partition… if Arab blood is spilled in Palestine, Jewish blood will be spilled elsewhere in the world."

Four days afterwards, the Iraqi foreign minister, Muhammad Fadil al Jamali said that "We will not be able to restrain the masses in the Arab countries, after the harmony in which Jews and Arabs lived together." There was no harmony. There had been a massacre of Jews just a few years earlier. El Jamali lied, of course. The very same Iraqi government had encouraged the harassment of Jews and issued orders to confiscate all Jewish property.

Additionally, the Iraqi leader of the time, Nuri Said, had already presented a plan for expelling the Jews in 1949, even before the hasty − actually forced − exit of the Jews from Iraq. He also explained that "The Jews are a source of trouble in Iraq. They have no place among us. We must get rid of them as best we were able." Said even presented a plan to lead the Jews via Jordan in order to coerce them into passage to Israel. Jordan objected, but the expulsion was implemented anyway. Said even admitted that this entailed a type of population exchange.

So the massacres, the pogroms and the great expulsion of the Jews was a continuation of their suffering under Muslim rule. There have always been Muslims who came out in defense of the Jews. They are also worthy of mention. That were also periods of prosperity, but it appears that most of the Jewish prosperity, as in Egypt in the 1920s and 1930s, in Algeria in the 19th and 20th centuries, in Iraq in the 1920s − was under colonial rule. In most cases, the situation of the Jews was bad before the European invasion and worsened once again with the end of the colonial era.

* * *

Throughout the relations between Jews and Arabs, in Arab countries or in the course of the Zionist enterprise, there was not one case of a pogrom against Muslims of the type committed by the Arabs against the Jews. Even in the worst cases, which must be condemned, such as Deir Yassin, they occurred as part of a military confrontation.

Those are cases that should be condemned, but we need to put things in perspective. The Arabs slaughtered the Jews without any hostilities and without any military excuse, just because they were Jews. And those few Arabs who were killed, were killed as part of a military campaign. Despite this, any injury inflicted on the Arab population resulted in innumerable investigations and references. The worst abuse of all, the abuse of Jews by Arabs, was erased and forgotten.

Let's return to Deir Yassin, the ultimate symbol of the Nakba. We have called it an indecent act and we will repeat that. But we must note that it was preceded by a series of murderous terrorist attacks against the civilian population. Waves of incidents, which to all intents and purposes were actual pogroms, by an incited mob that attacked the civilian population. Thousands of Jews were slaughtered – women, children and the elderly. The Palestinians even murdered their own people. In the great Arab Revolt in the 1930s, 400 Jews and 5,000 Arabs were killed, most of them at the hands of their brethren.

The months before Deir Yassin were the worst of all. 39 workers were murdered at the Haifa refineries, 50 Jews were killed by car bombs in Jerusalem, and on and on. In total, in the four months between the vote on partition and the declaration of establishment of the State of Israel, 815 Jews were murdered, most of them before the Deir Yassin incident (on April 9, 1948), some afterwards (the slaughter of the Hadassah hospital convoy: 79 killed, April 13, 1948). Most were civilians. Most died in massacres and terrorist attacks. And that is the real background. Far more murdered Jews. But they have all been forgotten. They should be mentioned. That is the Jewish Nakba, whose victims, in Israel and around the world, are mentioned less and less.

The Palestinians paid the price: Close to a million Jews lived in Arab countries at the time of the establishment of the State of Israel. Just a few live there today. Most left because they suffered from pogroms and the threat to their lives. It was a crueler expulsion than the one suffered by the Arabs of Palestine, who paid the price for the declarations of war and annihilation made by their leaders. Even the Jewish property that was confiscated or abandoned as a result of the expulsion is more valuable than the Arab property that remained in Israel.

Various investigators have tried to estimate the value of the confiscated Jewish property following the forced departure of the Jews from Arab countries, compared with the Arab property left in Israel following the forced departure of the Arabs. Economist Sidney Zabludoff, an international expert in the field, estimates that the value of the Arab property is $3.9 billion, compared with the value of the Jewish property which is $6 billion (at 2007 values).

So even in this area, the Palestinians' claims are refuted. They dragged the Arab countries into war. They paid the price. And they are the ones who caused the Jews to pay an even higher price. Both in property and in blood.

This article is not intended to cultivate the Jewish Nakba, and it by no means includes all the cases of pogroms, property confiscations, forced conversions and other harassment. The purpose is precisely the opposite. When they understand, in the Arab world in general, and the Palestinians in particular, that suffering, expulsion, loss of property, the cost in lives, is not the monopoly of one side, they may, perhaps, have the sense to understand that this past is a matter for history lessons. Because if we start to perform a political accounting, they have an overdraft. The Jewish Nakba was far greater. The suffering was enormous. But it is the suffering of many nations, Jews and Arabs among them, who went through the experience as part of the creation of new nation states.

It is therefore worth presenting the story of the Jewish Nakba. Not for the purpose of increasing the hostility, but for the purpose of presenting the truth, and for the purpose of reconciliation between the nations. Inshallah.