Posts tonen met het label Mensenrechten / Human Rights. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Mensenrechten / Human Rights. Alle posts tonen

zondag 23 oktober 2011

Verenigde Naties medeplichtig aan slavernij en andere misdaden tegen de mensheid

 
De Soedanese vluchteling Simon Deng liet al vaker van zich horen over de eenzijdige kritiek op Israel, die alleen maar de aandacht lijkt af te leiden van de vele mensenrechtenschenders elders.
Deng zelf weet als zwarte Soedanees goed wat het is om onder een Arabische dictatuur te leven. Israels behandeling van de vluchtelingen uit Darfur en van minderheden in het algemeen is verre van volmaakt, maar steekt gunstig af tegen die in de Arabische wereld.
 
 
_______________ 

 

The United Nations: Accessory to Slavery and other Crimes Against Humanity

http://www.hudson-ny.org/2518/united-nations-slavery

by Simon Deng
October 19, 2011 at 5:00 am

Like you, I came to this conference, The Perils of Global Intolerance to protest this third Durban conference which is an effort based on a set of lies, and organized by nations who are themselves are guilty of the worst kinds of oppression.

Durban III will not help the victims of racism. It will only isolate and target the Jewish state. It is a tool of the enemies of Israel. The UN has lost its way. Its obsession with the Jewish obvious: . For over 50 years, 82% of the UN General Assembly emergency meetings have been about condemning one state - Israel. Hitler could not have been made happier.

Given all the good Israel does in the world, given its democracy and its striving to follow the highest standards of human rights, even in the face of the most brutal, the most fanatic enemies, the Durban Conference is an outrage. All decent people know that.

But friends, I come here today to make a different case. I come with what you might at first think is a radical proposition: I come to tell you that there are peoples who suffer from the UN's anti-Israelism even more than the Israelis. I belong to one of those people.

By exaggerating Palestinian suffering, and by blaming the Jews for it, the UN has muffled the cries of those who suffer on a far larger scale.

For over fifty years the indigenous black African population of Sudan -- Christians and Muslims alike --- have been the victims of the brutal, racist Arab Muslim regimes in Khartoum.

In South Sudan, my homeland, Sudan, about four million innocent men, women and children were slaughtered from 1955 to 2005. Seven million were ethnically cleansed, and they became the largest refugee group since World War II.

Everybody at the United Nations is concerned about the so-called Palestinian refugees. They dedicated a separate agency to provide for them; this agency, UNWRA, treats them with a special privilege.

Meanwhile, my people, ethnically cleansed, murdered and enslaved, are relatively ignored. The UN even resisted using the word "slavery" to describe the enslavement of tens of thousands of my people. Why? Because slavery is a crime against humanity, apparently no one committing it wanted to end up before an international court. When Khartoum insisted that the term "abducted people" be substituted for the word "slaves," the UN, caved to Arab pressure and agreed. Try that in America. Try calling Frederick Douglas an "abducted person." It is outrageous.

The UN refuses to tell the world the truth about the root causes of Sudan's conflicts. Take Darfur, for example. Who knows really what is happening in Darfur? It is not a "tribal conflict." It is a conflict rooted in Arab colonialism, as it has typically been practiced in Africa. In Darfur, a region in the Western Sudan everybody is Muslim. Everybody is Muslim because the Arabs invaded the North of Africa and converted the indigenous people to Islam In the eyes of the Islamists in Khartoum, the Darfuris are not Muslim enough. And they also do not want to be Arabized. They like their own African languages and dress and customs. They resist Arabization. The Arab response is genocide. But nobody tells the truth about Darfur.

In the Nuba Mountains, another region of Sudan, genocide is taking place as I speak. The regime is targeting the black Africans -- Muslims and Christians. This happened to the Nuba people before. In the 1990's hundreds of thousands were murdered; a large number of women were raped; children were abducted and forcibly converted to Islam. Nobody at the UN told the truth about the Nuba Mountains.

Do you see a massive amount of outrage and reports and protests about this coming out of the UN or Human Rights Watch or Amnesty International? Do you hear them condemn Arab anti-black racism?

Look at the pages of the New York Times, or the record of the UN condemnations, What you will find is "Israeli crimes" and Palestinian suffering. My people have been driven off the front pages by the exaggerations of Palestinian suffering. Why? Because what Israel does is portrayed as a Western sin that we are all supposed to address.

The truth is that the West commits a real sin when it abandons us: the actual victims of non-Westerns. Our suffering has become almost taboo.

Let me return to the topic of slavery: while there are issues that divide public opinion, we can all agree that for one man to own another is a sin, and it should be stopped. The Americans tore themselves apart over the issue of slavery.

Chattel slavery, a centuries-long practice in Sudan, was revived as a tool of war in the early '90s. The Islamist regime in Khartoum declared jihad, or holy war, and thereby legitimized taking slaves as war booty. Arab militias were sent to destroy Southern villages and were encouraged to take African women and children as slaves. We believe that up to 200,000 were kidnapped, brought to the North and sold into slavery.

I am a living proof of this crime against humanity.

I do not like talking about my experience as a slave, but I do it because it is important for the world to know that slavery exists even today.

I was only nine years old when I was made a slave. An Arab neighbor named Abdullahi tricked me into following him to a boat destined to Northern Sudan where he gave me as a gift to his family. For three and a half years I was their slave going through something that no child should ever go through: brutal beatings and humiliations; working around the clock; sleeping on the ground with animals; eating the family's left-overs. During those three years I was unable to say the word "no." All I could say was "yes," "yes," "yes."

The United Nations knew about the brutal enslavement of South Sudanese by the Arabs from the early days of the conflict. Human Right Watch issued extensive reports about the issue. These reports gathered dust on UN shelves. It took UNICEF – under pressure from the Jewish –led American Anti-Slavery Group -- sixteen years to acknowledge what was happening.

As soon as the Sudanese government and the Arab League pressured UNICEF, the UN agency backtracked, and proceeded to criticize the Non-Governmental Organizations that worked to liberate Sudanese slaves. In 1998, Dr. Gaspar Biro, the courageous UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Sudan who reported on slavery, resigned in protest of the UN's actions.

My friends, today, tens of thousands of black South Sudanese still serve their masters in the North and the UN is silent about that. It would offend the OIC and the Arab League. So much for "human rights for everybody".

As a former slave and a victim of the worst sort of racism, allow me to explain why I think calling Israel a racist state is absolutely absurd and immoral.

I have been to Israel five times visiting the Sudanese refugees. Let me tell you how they ended up there. These are Sudanese who fled Arab racism, hoping to find shelter in Egypt. They were wrong. In 2005, the refugees camped outside the offices of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees in Cairo looking for mercy. Instead, the United Nations closed its doors and left the helpless women and children at the mercy of the ruthless Egyptian security forces who brutally slaughtered at least 26 of them.

After this event the Sudanese realized that Arab racism is the same, whether it is in Khartoum or in Cairo. So they continued looking for a shelter and they found it in Israel. Dodging the bullets of the Egyptian border patrols and walking for punishingly long distances, the refugees' only hope was to reach Israel's side of the fence, where they knew they would be safe.

The fact that even Darfuris, who are Muslims, chose Israel above all the other Arab-Muslim states of the area, speaks volumes.. Israel is racist? Israel is against the Muslim world? Ask the thousands of black Muslim Darfuris who found shelter inside the Jewish state.

When I asked the refugees about the treatment they receive in Israel, their response is absolutely the opposite of what the United Nations alleges. They were welcomed and treated like human beings. Compared to the situation in Egypt, they described their lives in Israel as "heaven." No-one called them "abid" – an Arabic word for slaves often used in Sudan, Egypt and other Arab nations.

Is Israel a racist state? To my people, the people who know racism – the answer is absolutely not. It is a state of people of the colors of the rainbow. Jews themselves come in all colors, even black. I met with beautiful black Ethiopian Jews in Israel. Israel is a state that has taken my own black people in, rescued them, and helped them.

So, yes … my claim may be a radical claim: I claim that the victims who suffer most from the UN's anti-Israel policy are not just the Israelis but all those people who have to be ignored in order for the UN to tell its big lie against Israel: all those victims of non Western abuse, especially all those victims of Arab and Muslim abuse: women, ethnic minorities, religious minorities, homosexuals, in the Arab and Muslim world. These are the biggest victims of UN Israel hatred.

So far, the Israelis have only been cursed by the UN. But look at the situation of the Copts, the Christians in Iraq, and Nigeria, and Iran, the Hindus and Bahais and Sikhs who suffer from Islamic oppression. We all suffer. We are ignored, we are abandoned so that the big lie against the Jews can go forward.

Before I conclude let me tell you a story that reflects a special connection that the people of South Sudan feel toward Israel. In 2005, I visited one of the refugee camps in South Sudan. I met a twelve year old girl who told me about her dream. In a dream she wanted to go to school to become a doctor, and then, she wanted to visit Israel. I was shocked and numb. How could this refugee girl who spent most of her life in the North know about Israel? When I asked why she wanted to visit Israel, she said: "This is our people." I was never able to find an answer to my question.

On July 9 of 2011 South Sudan became an independent state. We achieved freedom despite the opposition from the Arab world and despite the United Nations, whose General Secretary, Bi Ki Moon, lobbied for the unity of Sudan. For the South Sudanese, that would mean continuation of oppression, brutalization, demonization, Islamization, Arabization and enslavement.

In a similar manner, the Arabs continue denying Jews their right for sovereignty in their homeland; and the Durban III conference continues denying Israel's legitimacy.

As a friend of Israel, I salute the President of the Republic of South Sudan, Salva Kiir, who had the courage to state publicly that South Sudan embassy in Israel will be built--- not in Tel Aviv, but in Jerusalem, the eternal capital of the Jewish people.

I also want to assure you that my own new nation, and all of its people, will oppose racist forums like the Durban III. We will oppose it by simply telling the truth.

This originally appeared in a a slightly different form as an address at a conference titled "The Perils of Global Intolerance", in New York City, September 22, 2011.

 

zondag 14 augustus 2011

Palestijnen hekelen huichelen mensenrechtenorganisaties

 

Niet sympathisanten van Israel, maar Palestijnen hekelen nu het feit dat mensenrechtenorganisaties vooral aandacht voor ze hebben wanneer Israel ze leed bezorgt, en hun problemen met de eigen autoriteiten negeren. 

Ironisch genoeg worden de gewone Palestijnen het meest getroffen door het cynische gedrag van groepen en organisaties die beweren op te komen voor de Palestijnse Arabieren.

Dit geldt ook voor de vluchtelingen, die in kampen worden gehouden en geen volwaardig staatsburger van hun 'gastland' mogen worden. De Arabische Liga heeft daar zelfs een aparte clausule over opgenomen, om toch vooral maar te voorkomen dat Palestijnen integreren in de Arabische landen en vervolgens hun mythische recht op terugkeer zouden opgeven, een grote stap op weg naar vrede. De slachtoffers zijn in de eerste plaats de Palestijnen zelf, in de vluchtelingenkampen, maar ook daarbuiten, omdat deze politiek vrede en een oplossing van het conflict blokkeert. 

 

RP

----------- 

 

 

Palestijnen hekelen huichelen mensenrechtenorganisaties

http://israeltoday.nl/headlines/9-nederlands/1703-palestijnen-hekelen-huichelen-mensenrechtenorganisaties

Vrijdag, 12 Augustus 2011 15:59 

 

• Honderden arrestaties door Palestijnse veiligheidstroepen, vooral van Hamasleden;
• Demonstranten in Hebron: waarom komen mensenrechtenorganisaties wel in actie tegen Israëlische overtredingen en niet tegen misstanden bij de Palestijnse Autoriteit?

Palestijnse Arabieren demonstreerden donderdag na een golf van arrestaties en beschuldigden internationale mensenrechtenorganisaties ervan, zich slechts te bekommeren om hun welzijn als Israël de boosdoener is.

Honderden demonstranten kwamen in Hebron bijeen na de recente golf van arrestaties van honderden Palestijnse activisten – de meesten Hamasleden - door het regime van de Palestijnse leider Machmoud Abbas.

Het Bethlehemse persbureau Ma'an meldde dat op veel borden die de demonstranten droegen deze tekst stond: "Wat is de rol van mensenrechtenorganisaties - wat doen jullie om recht te bereiken?'

Verscheidene mensen in de menigte beschuldigden mensenrechtenorganisaties ervan, mensenrechtenschendingen door de Palestijnse Autoriteit te negeren, zelfs als ze stoppen met hun werkwijze om elke vermeende schending door Israël te onderzoeken en te veroordelen.

Dit is een hardnekkig verschijnsel bij zowel mensenrechtenorganisaties als bij de mainstream internationale pers. Beide besteden overdreven veel tijd en moeite aan het kritisch volgen van Israël, maar geven de Palestijnen min of meer de vrije hand. Dit leidt tot de conclusie dat hun motivatie niet echt de vrijheid of de waarheid is, maar eerder een politieke agenda tegen de Joodse staat.

Ironisch genoeg worden de gewone Palestijnen het meest getroffen door het cynische gedrag van groepen en organisaties die beweren op te komen voor de Palestijnse Arabieren.

 

zaterdag 30 juli 2011

Geen mensenrechten voor Palestijnse vluchtelingen


Een goeie, korte video over de positie van Palestijnse vluchtelingen in de Arabische staten. Na 60 jaar hebben ze nog steeds nauwelijks rechten in hun 'gastlanden'. Stel je voor als Nederland vluchtelingen 60 jaar in een kamp of getto zou houden zonder burgerrechten...


 

zondag 10 juli 2011

Activisten 'Air Flotilla' bij protesten Bil'in en Kalandiya op Westoever

 

Volgens een bericht in de Haaretz worden alleen de activisten vastgehouden die weigerden te beloven alleen aan vreedzame demonstraties deel te nemen, en zijn zij die dit wel beloofden vrij naar de Westbank te reizen. Volgens zowel de Jerusalem Post als Haaretz hebben tientallen activisten die door de veiligheidschecks zijn gekomen op de Westbank gedemonstreerd en kwamen in aanvaring met het Israelische leger. Er staat niet bij hoe het precies tot rellen en gewelddadigheden is gekomen. Het is wel duidelijk dat de activisten niet slechts naar ‘Palestina’ kwamen om er vrienden te bezoeken, zoals werd gesuggereerd door bijvoorbeeld Anja Meulenbelt. Palestijnen zou het recht worden ontzegd om vrienden te ontvangen. Het is waar dat je extra wordt ondervraagd, maar het is zeker mogelijk om Palestijnen te bezoeken op de Westoever en daarover hoef je niet te jokken zoals Meulenbelt beweert. Waar je misschien wel beter over kunt jokken is je bedoeling mee te doen aan demonstraties die vaak uitlopen op een gewelddadige confrontatie met het leger, en worden georganiseerd door extreme groepen met banden met teroristische organisaties, zoals de International Solidarity Movement.

 

RP

----------

 

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/israel-to-deport-pro-palestinian-fly-in-activists-within-48-hours-1.372358Haaretz meldt:

 

Four activists from Germany and Holland were released and permitted to enter Israel after they pledged not to participate in violent protest activities.

According to police, anyone "who wanted to protest in a legitimate and non-violent manner was permitted to enter" Israel.

The 120 detained activists are less than half of the more than 300 who were originally questioned by police. Police said that the detained activists were those who refused to promise not to participate in violent protests.

Some activists refused to talk to investigators and only presented their passports.

=============

 

''Air Flotilla' activists at protests in Bil'in, Kalandiya'

  
 

Organizers claim pro-Palestinian activists who managed to pass border control at Ben-Gurion Airport are participating in W.Bank protests.

http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Article.aspx?id=228580

 

 

Pro-Palestinian activists that managed to pass border control at Ben-Gurion Airport as part of the "air flotilla" arrived in the West Bank on Saturday and were present for clashes with security forces in Nabi Saleh, Channel 2 reported.

Earlier, "Welcome to Palestine" organizers said that fly-in activists would be participating in events marking the anniversary of the International Court of Justice's ruling on the West Bank security barrier.

The statement said the European activists would be participating in demonstrations in Bil'in and Kalandiya.

The clashes in Nabi Saleh resulted in several arrests, the IDF spokesperson confirmed, but would not comment on the nationality of those arrested.

On Saturday morning, thirty nine pro-Palestinian activists that arrived at Ben-Gurion Airport were refused entry to the country and were taken to Ela Prison in Beersheba for questioning .

The Immigration and Population Authority reported that the activists arrived on a Lufthansa flight late Friday night.

124 activists have been detained in prisons around the country in total and were awaiting deportation, including 76 women and 48 men.

Police on Friday said that 69 activists had been denied entry. Four of those denied entry were sent back to their original destinations, while the rest were taken into custody untilflights could be arranged, Army Radio reported.

Two of the flights, one EasyJet from Geneva and one Alitalia, were diverted to Terminal 1, where police combed passengers for pro-Palestinian activists expected to attempt entry into the country as part of the "Air Flotilla," Police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said. Police believed a bulk of foreign pro-Palestinian activists were on those jets.

After police finished checking the flights, passengers not connected to the groups of activists were ferried back to Terminal 3. The suspected activists were taken to a separate area of the airport for questioning.

The activists involved represented a number of different countries, including the United States, Germany, France, Spain, Belgium, and the Netherlands. 

Police Insp.-Gen. Yochanan Danino said his officers "succeeded in meeting the mission set by the government." Undercover agents and police continued to be deployed at the airport as more "air flotilla" participants were expected to arrive. 

Meanwhile, six left-wing Israeli activists were arrested after causing a disturbance in the arrivals area at Terminal Three, police added.

"Five males and one female are being questioned," Rosenfeld said. 

The activists held up signs inside the terminal saying "Welcome to Palestine."

Tovah Lazaroff, Herb Keinon, and Yaakov Lappin contributed to this report.

 

zaterdag 9 juli 2011

VN mensenrechtenvertegenwoordiger Richard Falk biedt 'excuses' aan voor cartoon op zijn blog

 
Dit is de zoveelste ‘uitglijder’ van antiziosemiet Richard Falk. Hij zou allang ontslagen moeten zijn, maar misschien is dit een goede aanleiding voor Ban ki Moon om van een rapporteur af te komen die (wat er nog over is van) de goede naam van de VN bezoedelt en haat verspreid?  
 
RP
---------- 

 

UN Official Admits to “Unintentionally” Posting Anti-Semitic Cartoon

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/07/07/un-official-admits-to-unintentionally-posting-anti-semitic-cartoon/

Alana Goodman | @alanagoodman   07.07.2011 - 5:10 PM

 

 

Not only did he come clean, he issued a bizarre quasi-apology as well – but more on that in a second.

 

The controversy began when Richard Falk, the UN envoy for human rights in the Palestinian territories, posted a cartoon of a yarmulke-wearing dog chewing on a bloody skeleton and urinating on Lady Justice on his personal blog last month.

 

After he was confronted about the cartoon’s anti-Semitic connotations, he initially denied posting it. “It is a complete lie,” he reportedly wrote on his blog. “I know nothing about such a cartoon, and would never publish such a thing, ever.” A few minutes later, Falk backtracked, removing the post from his blog and explaining he “didn’t realize that it could be viewed as anti-Semitic, and still do not realize.”

And now Falk has finally issued an “apology,” clarifying that he opposes any denigration of individuals “based on ethnicity, race, religion, stage of development.”

“My intention has never been to demean in any way Jews as a people despite my strong criticisms of Israeli policies, and some versions of Zionist support,” said Falk.

His statement then incongruously launches into a lecture on respecting animals, saying, “If we are to have a sustainable human future we must also make peace with nature, and treat animals with as much respect as possible. This is both a sacred imperative of my idea of a spiritual life, but also an integral aspect of species survival on an increasingly crowded, overheated, and endangered planet.”

Is Falk also apologizing to animal rights activists who might have been offended by the cartoon’s portrayal of a dog as a Jew?

The group UN Watch also found this message inappropriate, writing, “Falk here appears not only to be equating animals with human beings, but to be apologizing for his cartoon’s insult to Jews as well as dogs.”

 

But honestly, even the most heartfelt apology from Falk wouldn’t change the fact the guy has to go. He’s been a problem for the UN for too long. Earlier this year, US Ambassador Susan Rice called for Falk’s resignation after he was accused of supporting the 9/11 “Truther” movement. This latest cartoon controversy seems to fit a pattern of extremely poor judgment and embarrassing mishaps.

 

For what it’s worth, the Anti-Defamation League is asking the UN to publicly condemn Falk, but the group doesn’t seem to be going as far as UN Watch, which is now calling for Falk’s dismissal.

 

 

vrijdag 8 juli 2011

Hamas begint mannelijke kappers in Gaza te arresteren

 

Natuurlijk zouden de flotillista's ook tegen dit soort onrecht actie hebben gevoerd in Gaza, niet? Ze zijn immers voor gelijkheid tussen man en vrouw en tegen religieuze dwang, of is dat alleen wanneer het Israel betreft? Uiteraard is dit maar een van de vele voorbeelden van dwang en discriminatie in Gaza, en zijn er schrijnender zaken zoals de problemen die mensen en organisaties die enige kritiek durven uiten op het Hamas regime ondervinden, religieuze minderheden en homo's. Tot nu toe stonden de flottilista's (en apologeten van de Palestijnen uberhaupt) kritiekloos tegenover het Hamas bewind, dat immers door de bevolking is gekozen (dus is het geen probleem dat ze diezelfde bevolking onderdrukken en raketten afschieten op Israel en de Holocaust ontkennen en kinderen indoctineren etc.), dat zozeer de voet wordt dwars gezet door Israel en de internationale gemeenschap dat het geen kans krijgt te laten zien hoe humaan het eigenlijk wel niet is en dat eerlijk, heus waar, veel gematigder is dan we in het Westen denken (ondanks het feit dat het in de media constant als pragmatisch wordt afgeschilderd en men geregeld bezoek krijgt van allerlei zogenaamd verlichte westerlingen die menen dat Hamas ten onrechte wordt geïsoleerd). 

 

RP

----------- 

 

Hamas starts arresting male hairdressers

 

From the BBC:

 

The Hamas government in Gaza has begun enforcing a law introduced last year banning men from cutting women's hair.

Until now, the law had not been enforced, but this week at least one male hairdresser in Gaza was arrested.

Male hairdressers for women are regarded by many Muslims as against Islamic tradition.

The move is seen as an attempt to bolster Hamas's Islamic credentials against critics who say it has become too moderate.

The reality is in Gaza - with its huge Muslim majority - most women do not want to have their hair cut by men.

Nevertheless a few salons have clung on, where male hairdressers work.

This week they are sitting idle outside their shops, fearful of arrest if they step inside.

Adnan Barakat, a hairdresser with 27 years experience, said:"Without work, I am like a dead man, because I am without work. The salon cannot work without me. This is my work since 1984. I haven't another work. What can I do?"

Others, like Mr Barakat, complain they are being watched by undercover police.

Hamas argues it is only enforcing a law that the majority of people here want.

 

I guess it is hard to get your hair styled when you are wearing a burqa.

It's a real shame that the flotilla imploded. Because you just know that those champions of human rights would have spent a day protesting and singing songs of solidarity with the hairdressers.

(h/t Folderol)

 Elder of Ziyon   

 

dinsdag 5 juli 2011

Rechten van vrouwen, homo's en christenen in Gazastrook in de verdrukking

 
Enkele van de problemen in de Gazastrook waarover je de 'Free Gaza' activisten niet hoort....
 
Wouter
______________
 

 

Women’s rights ‘deteriorating’ in Gaza; gays, Christians also suffer

http://justiceforgaza.com/2011/06/23/women%E2%80%99s-rights-%E2%80%98deteriorating%E2%80%99-in-gaza-gays-christians-also-suffer/

by Linda Gradstein
Special to Justice for Gaza

 

 Fatma Ashour is not typical of women in Gaza. At 32, she is single and a lawyer with her own office. Ashur, who wears the traditional Islamic headscarf, says it is not easy to be a woman in Gaza and describes a pattern of discrimination and even violence against women.

“If I walk down the street and I am wearing pants instead of the traditional dress, men will call me a prostitute,” Ashur, who grew up in the more liberal Egypt, said ruefully. “I can’t do a lot of things that I want to. I can’t go swimming. I can’t ride a bicycle. I can’t smoke a water pipe in a restaurant. I can’t even walk with a male colleague.”

Last year, Gaza’s Islamist Hamas rulers announced that female lawyers must wear the headscarf and traditional dress known as the jilbab to appear in court. Ashour stayed home for three months in protest. Eventually, Hamas repealed the ban, but other directives, like making it illegal for women to smoke a water pipe in public, remain in force.

Gaza is a traditional society, and only an estimated 11-13 percent of women work outside the home, according to Khalil Shaheen, the director of the economic and social welfare department at the Palestinian Center for Human Rights or PCHR.

“Women’s rights are deteriorating day by day and there is growing violence against women,” he said. “There is a culture of fear in Gaza.”

Islamic law, which is enforced in custody cases in Gaza, mandates that fathers are given custody for boys older than age 7 and girls older than 9. If a divorced woman remarries, she must immediately give up her children, regardless of their age. These laws, combined with women’s lack of independent financial resources often keep women in unhappy marriages. Shaheen says Gaza mental health centers are reporting more cases of verbal and physical abuse of women.

Violence has increased as unemployment and poverty have grown. Unemployment stands at 45 percent, one of the highest in the world, and an estimated 1 million of Gaza’s 1.5 million people are dependent on food aid from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) to survive.

Women marry young in Gaza, in their late teens or early 20s, and often have large families despite their poverty. All of these factors conspire to keep women in traditional roles.

The situation is even worse for gays in Gaza. Homosexuality is illegal and has been prosecuted. In April, a militant group in Gaza kidnapped and killed Italian civil rights activist Vittorio Arrigoni. Several press reports said that one reason for his death was that Arrigoni was openly gay and living with a partner in Gaza.

Mental health professionals in Gaza say there are no reliable statistics on homosexuals in Gaza as the social taboo is too strong and homosexuals are afraid of being arrested.

Numbering about 2,000 in Gaza, Christians, too, face difficulties. Legally, their right
to worship is protected, but any suspected missionary activity has been harshly stopped. In 2007, Rami Ayyad, the Baptist owner of a Gaza bookstore was killed after his bookstore was firebombed. Islamic extremists took responsibility and accused him of missionary activity.

Most Christians in Gaza are Greek Orthodox. They see themselves as an integral part of the Palestinian nation.  Some have complained they are uncomfortable with Hamas’s directives against women and feel social pressure to wear the veil, even though they are not Muslims. 

 

Linda Gradstein is a longtime reporter for NPR and contributor to the 
Washington Post, the Toronto Star and AOL News.

 

dinsdag 21 december 2010

Kritiek Human Rights Watch op waterbeleid Israel houdt geen water

 
Human Rights Watch herkauwt in het zoveelste rapport over Israelische mensenrechtenschendingen de hoax dat Israel water van de Palestijnen steelt. De Jerusalem Post maakt duidelijk waarom dit niet klopt:
 
 
THE REPORT takes Israel to task for a purportedly discriminatory water allocation policy. HRW stated that, "Average Israeli per capita consumption of water, including water consumption, by settlers is 4.3 times that of Palestinians in the occupied territories (including Gaza)."

This is true, as far as it goes: Per capita water consumption among Palestinians is 70 liters a day, compared to Israel's average per person of 300 liters a day. What HRW failed to mention, however, is that access to piped water has dramatically improved in recent decades and is significantly better than in Syria or Jordan, which would have been in control of the West Bank had it not attacked Israeli in 1967.

In fact, as Alon Tal of the Blaustein Institute for Desert Research at Ben-Gurion University noted in a recent article in the Israel Journal for Foreign Affairs, Israel has significantly exceeded its requirement as set down in the 1995 Oslo II Peace Accords, increasing supply by 60 million cubic meters (mcm) a year, instead of 28.6 mcm as required.

The 10 percent of the Palestinian population on the West Bank who do not have reasonable access to running water might usefully be contrasted with, say, Romania, where one-third of the population has no running water, or closer to home, the Jordanian city of Irbid, where 400,000 residents lack access.

The relatively widespread accessibility did not happen by itself. A World Bank report from April 2009 noted that Israel was responsible for a 50% rise in the number of West Bank Palestinians who have access to networked water supply. The World Bank also estimated that 45% of West Bank Palestinians' (and settlers') water is provided by Mekorot, the Israeli national water carrier, from sources located inside Israel. This has unfolded over the past two decades, moreover, during which the Palestinian population tripled to 2,461,000. As Tal concluded, "There are few developing economies that have achieved such dramatic improvements in such a short time."

None of this is mentioned in HRW's report. And while a litany of accusations are leveled at Israel – ranging from "over-extraction of water" to "refusal to approve Palestinian water projects" – no blame whatsoever is placed on Palestinians. Yet, as Tal notes, 30% of Palestinian water leaks out of poorly maintained pipes, three times what Israel loses to leakage.

The Palestinian Authority – with $1 billion in annual civil aid, the world's largest per capita recipient of international development assistance – invests precious little, if anything, in improving water delivery. And due to PA corruption, rural residents are often forced to pay exorbitant rates for bottled or tanker water. Deficient law enforcement by the PA also results in the digging of wells that threaten to contaminate major aquifers.

SUCH SKEWED treatment of Israel's water policy is a microcosm of HRW's wider failings, which were recently detailed to shocking effect in a lecture (republished on these pages on November 25) by its outraged founder Robert Bernstein. Not only does HRW's obsessive and antagonistic focus misrepresent Israel, it is also counterproductive to the Palestinian cause.

Ook Amnesty International kwam eerder met dergelijke op zijn best zeer eenzijdige verhalen, waarin Israel per definitie schuldig is aan alles waar het de Palestijnen aan ontbreekt en alle verschillen in welvaart. Dat de Palestijnen ook een eigen verantwoordelijkheid hebben, en dat er ook andere oorzaken zijn voor problemen dan alleen (vermeend) Israelisch wangedrag, racisme, en kolonialisme, wil er bij sommige mensen niet in. Een vergelijkend onderzoek waarbij de Palestijnen worden vergeleken met omliggende Arabische staten in plaats van met Israel, is soms heel verhelderend.
 
RP
------------------
 
Lees hier het hele artikel:
 
 
 

donderdag 11 november 2010

Woordvoerder Israel voor de VN Mensenrechtenraad


Je zal er maar staan, alleen, tussen al die vertegenwoordigers van landen waar Joden niet welkom zijn, waar mensenrechten zelfs op papier vaak niks voorstellen, waar de koning of de hoge moslim raad de kandidaten voor de verkiezingen moet goedkeuren, waar in sommige gevallen de regering minderheden opjaagt en in de gevangenis stopt. En allemaal wijzen ze met de vinger naar jou en noemen ze je de grootste schurkenstaat, de oorzaak van allerlei ellende en oorlogen en instabiliteit. Ze menen dat je niet democratisch genoeg bent, dat je rechters niet onafhankelijk zijn, dat je minderheden onderdrukt en dat je soldaten straffeloos en meedogenloos te werk gaan. En soms menen ze dat je uit bent op wereldmacht, dat je je gedraagt zoals de nazi's tegenover jou deden, en sowieso vinden ze dat je geen bestaansrecht hebt. Daar sta je dus. Lees hieronder wat de VN vertegenwoordiger voor Israel antwoordde op een speciale bijeenkomst van de Mensenrechtenraad over Israelische 'misdaden'.
 
RP
-------------
 

The loneliness of an Israeli UN representative

http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2010/11/loneliness-of-israeli-un-representative.html

The UN Fourth Committee met on November 8th to discuss, naturally, Israeli "crimes." Just as they did on November 1st, 2nd and 5th.

Here is a list of the countries whose representatives spoke: Egypt, Qatar, Tunisia, Malaysia, Morocco, Sudan, Bangladesh, Bahrain, Iran, Jordan, Libya, UAE, Algeria, Lebanon, Yemen, Nigeria, Tanzania, the PA - and Israel.

You have to admire any Israeli diplomat who can stand up to this uniform cast of hypocrites, day in and day out, whose own real human rights violations dwarf the worst lies that Israel has ever been accused of.

In this case, it was Amir Weissbrod, who is the Minister Counselor at the Permanent Mission of Israel to the UN, who had the task of defending Israel against the dictators and despots.

Here is the UN's synopsis of Amir Weissbrod's statement:

AMIR WEISSBROD (Israel), reaffirming the importance Israel placed on the preservation of human rights, said his country was a vibrant and open democracy that enjoyed an independent and highly professional judiciary, active civil society, and free press. Despite constant threats from terrorists, who sought to deny Israel's citizens their most fundamental rights, Israel upheld and pursued human rights as a sacrosanct ideal that was at the core of the values on which his State was built. It was unfortunate that the report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories did not seek to advance the values of human rights, but rather a cynical political agenda with the goal of vilifying Israel and the right of its citizens to live in peace and security and denying them the very right it purported to cherish for others.

He said that the report offered another one-sided narrative, submitting a wide-ranging and harsh criticism of Israel, while failing to mention the simple fact that more than 8,800 rockets had been launched from the Gaza Strip against Israeli towns and villages since 2001. The report also completely ignored the current military build-up by the Hamas terrorist organization, which cynically placed its military installations near and inside civilian buildings, including in close proximity to United Nations facilities, endangering both civilians and international organizations in the region. The report also did not mention that, for more than four years, Hamas had held the kidnapped soldier Gilad Shalit, depriving him of his basic human rights, including any visit from the Red Cross.

Explanations that such discussion about Hamas or human rights violations committed by other Palestinian groups did not fall within the mandate of the report were convenient and excluded the Committee from its basic obligation to pursue impartial and objective fact-finding, he said. The Special Committee in its work predetermined its conclusion and findings. Israel refused - and would continue to refuse - to cooperate with a body that prejudged its culpability.

He went on to say that there had been many positive developments in the West Bank and in Gaza over the past year, as had been acknowledged by the diplomatic Quartet and other relevant bodies that sought to promote peace, instead of the predictable narrative of the Special Committee. Israel was engaged with several United Nations agencies, international organizations, and partner countries, to move forward and substantially improve the West Bank economy, including the removal of hundreds of roadblocks and checkpoints. Those significant steps should not be taken lightly.

It was absurd, he said, to hear condemnation and criticism of Israel's judiciary system and human rights record from several countries in the region and beyond - countries where the majority of human rights activists were in prison, where there was no freedom of press, and where there was no independent judiciary. For those countries to lecture Israel about the way to conduct itself in regards to human rights was cynical and reflected the nature of the Special Committee's work. He asked which of those countries had ever conducted, even once, a true investigation into its State's human rights practices as Israel did. He called on Israel's Arab neighbours to join in taking concrete steps to pursue peace instead of engaging in futile rhetoric. He hoped that the Palestinians would join Israel in direct negotiations without delay.

maandag 19 april 2010

Amnesty International en de Jihad


Zelfs Salman Rushdie heeft de petitie hiertegen ondertekend, samen met nog 2.000 anderen:

Ms. Saghal's objections have been joined by nearly 2,000 others, many of them leading human-rights campaigners, who have put their names to a petition defending her and denouncing Amnesty's cooperation with Mr. Begg. More remarkable, however, has been Amnesty's defense of its work with Mr. Begg.

In his memoir, Mr. Begg acknowledges that he moved to Afghanistan in the summer of 2001 to "live in an Islamic state . . . free from the corruption and despotism of the rest of the world." He added that "the Taliban were better than anything Afghanistan has had in the past 25 years."
 
In a letter to the petitioners, Amnesty Secretary General Claudio Cordone praised Mr. Begg for advocating detainee rights "within the same framework of universal human rights standards that we are promoting." For good measure, Mr. Cordone added that Mr. Begg's belief in "jihad in self-defense" is not necessarily "antithetical to human rights."
 
Ik vind het ongelofelijk hoe ver Amnesty gaat in het verdedigen van deze man, en het vergoeilijken van zijn ideeën. Dit staat in schril contrast met haar felle kritiek op Israël en de VS, die in haar ogen niks goed schijnen te kunnen doen.
 
RP
 
 
Why is a human rights group working with a Taliban supporter?

Amnesty International defines itself as "a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights for all." So why is the organization working hand-in-glove with one of the Taliban's most notorious defenders?
 
That's a question serious human-rights campaigners are asking themselves in light of Amnesty's curious collaboration with Moazzam Begg. Mr. Begg is a British citizen and former Guantanamo detainee who, following his release in 2005, wrote a memoir and became director of a group called Cageprisoners, which Amnesty calls a "leading human rights organization."
 
In his memoir, Mr. Begg acknowledges that he moved to Afghanistan in the summer of 2001 to "live in an Islamic state . . . free from the corruption and despotism of the rest of the world." He added that "the Taliban were better than anything Afghanistan has had in the past 25 years."
 
Such views alone might have at least given Amnesty pause before it decided to offer him speaking platforms and bring him along to a meeting at 10 Downing Street. It certainly raised questions for Gita Sahgal, until recently the head of Amnesty's Gender Affairs Unit, who was suspended from her job earlier this year for opposing the organization's links to Mr. Begg and Cageprisoners. Ms. Saghal left her job for good on Friday, saying in a statement posted on the Internet that Amnesty has "made a mockery of the universality of rights."
 
Ms. Saghal's objections have been joined by nearly 2,000 others, many of them leading human-rights campaigners, who have put their names to a petition defending her and denouncing Amnesty's cooperation with Mr. Begg. More remarkable, however, has been Amnesty's defense of its work with Mr. Begg.
 
In a letter to the petitioners, Amnesty Secretary General Claudio Cordone praised Mr. Begg for advocating detainee rights "within the same framework of universal human rights standards that we are promoting." For good measure, Mr. Cordone added that Mr. Begg's belief in "jihad in self-defense" is not necessarily "antithetical to human rights."
 
In an email to us, Mr. Cordone insisted that Amnesty "does not now and has never supported any form of jihad," and that Mr. Begg and his group "condemn all attacks on civilians." That's nice to know, even if the concept of "defensive jihad" has been previously used by al Qaeda and the Taliban to justify the beading of "apostates" and the public lashing of women. As Ms. Saghal points out, "Adherence to violent jihad, even if it indeed rejects the killings of some civilians, is an integral part of a political philosophy that promotes the destruction of human rights generally."
 
None of this should be hard to grasp. Still, it's a pity that a group that was born to give voice to the victims of oppression should now devote itself to sanitizing the oppressors. The novelist Salman Rushdie, among the signatories of the petition, put it well when he said that "Amnesty and Begg have revealed, by their statements and actions, that they deserve our contempt."
 
 

Petitie: Amnesty International onder vuur wegens associatie met islamist


Meer zorgwekkend nieuws over Amnesty International.
 
 
RP
-------------
 
 
 
Please read this, and sign the petition to support Human Rights  and Gita Sahgal.
 
Gita Sahgal resigned her senior position at Amnesty International following her suspension. Sahgal is a veteran campaigner for gender rights and member of Women Against Fundamentalism. She was suspended for criticizing Amnesty's connection with Moazzam Begg, a supporter of Islamism and ex-Guantanamo inmate, and his organization Cageprisoners. In February she had written:
 

This morning the Sunday Times published an article about Amnesty International's association with groups that support the Taliban and promote Islamic Right ideas. In that article, I was quoted as raising concerns about Amnesty's very high profile associations with Guantanamo-detainee Moazzam Begg. I felt that Amnesty International was risking its reputation by associating itself with Begg, who heads an organization, Cageprisoners, that actively promotes Islamic Right ideas and individuals. 

Within a few hours of the article being published, Amnesty had suspended me from my job.

A moment comes, which comes but rarely in history, when a great organisation must ask: if it lies to itself, can it demand the truth of others? For in defending the torture standard, one of the strongest and most embedded in international human rights law, Amnesty International has sanitized the history and politics of the ex-Guantanamo detainee, Moazzam Begg and completely failed to recognize the nature of his organisation Cageprisoners. 

The tragedy here is that the necessary defence of the torture standard has been inexcusably allied to the political legitimization of individuals and organisations belonging to the Islamic Right. 

I have always opposed the illegal detention and torture of Muslim men at Guantanamo Bay and during the so-called War on Terror. I have been horrified and appalled by the treatment of people like Moazzam Begg and I have personally told him so. I have vocally opposed attempts by governments to justify 'torture lite'.

The issue is not about Moazzam Begg's freedom of opinion, nor about his right to propound his views: he already exercises these rights fully as he should. The issue is a fundamental one about the importance of the human rights movement maintaining an objective distance from groups and ideas that are committed to systematic discrimination and fundamentally undermine the universality of human rights. I have raised this issue because of my firm belief in human rights for all.

I sent two memos to my management asking a series of questions about what considerations were given to the nature of the relationship with Moazzam Begg and his organisation, Cageprisoners. I have received no answer to my questions. There has been a history of warnings within Amnesty that it is inadvisable to partner with Begg. Amnesty has created the impression that Begg is not only a victim of human rights violations but a defender of human rights. Many of my highly respected colleagues, each well-regarded in their area of expertise has said so. Each has been set aside.

As a result of my speaking to the Sunday Times, Amnesty International has announced that it has launched an internal inquiry. This is the moment to press for public answers, and to demonstrate that there is already a public demand including from Amnesty International members, to restore the integrity of the organisation and remind it of its fundamental principles.

I have been a human rights campaigner for over three decades, defending the rights of women and ethnic minorities, defending religious freedom and the rights of victims of torture, and campaigning against illegal detention and state repression. I have raised the issue of the association of Amnesty International with groups such as Begg's consistently within the organisation. I have now been suspended for trying to do my job and staying faithful to Amnesty's mission to protect and defend human rights universally and impartially.

 
Amnesty has also blatantly taken sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a matter of political position and not "rights," as it sponsored an event called "Capital Murder" about Israel's building in East Jerusalem, with a speaker who wrote the obligatory book on "Israel Apartheid." Amnesty has obviously been coopted from being a "rights" organization into being a "wrongs" organization.
 
(A.I.)