Richard Falk heeft Israels beleid tegenover de Palestijnen al eerder met de nazi's vergeleken, maar wordt desondanks door velen als een geschikte en onpartijdige VN rapporteur gezien. EoZ heeft aangetoond dat hij heeft gelogen over een zogenaamd aanbod voor een staakt het vuren van Hamas dat Israel volgens hem onterecht had afgewezen. Zelfs de PA is hem blijkbaar liever kwijt omdat hij te pro-Hamas is.
RP
------------
Palestinian Authority considers Richard Falk to be too pro-Hamas?
http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2010/03/palestinian-authority-considers-richard.html
Richard Falk, the UN's "special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories," says he has been asked to resign by the Palestinian Authority - because he is too pro-terror even for them:
Richard Falk, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, said on Monday the Palestinian Authority (PA) urged him to step down after he criticized the PA's treatment of a UN war crimes report.
Falk confirmed reports that the joint PA-PLO mission to the UN in Geneva also delayed consideration in the UN Human Rights Council of his most recent report detailing Israeli abuses of Palestinians' rights.
Arabic-language news reports of the delay surfaced last week.
He said PA officials formally approached him in February asking him to resign, arguing that he is unable to carry out his responsibilities since Israel detained him at Ben Gurion International Airport and deported him in late 2008.
But, he stressed in an interview, "what they [the PA] say formally and what they say informally are quite different."
"Informally they say different things, things that are essentially untrue, that my health doesn't me allow to do the job or that I'm a partisan of Hamas," Falk added.
Falk's mandate is narrowly defined to include only the human rights record of the occupying power, Israel, in the occupied West Bank and Gaza – he does not report to the UN on the actions of the PA or the Hamas government in Gaza.
But Falk did raise hackles in Ramallah when he publicly criticized the PA for delaying UN action on judge Richard Goldstone's report that accused Israel and Palestinian militias of committing war crimes during the 2008-2009 Gaza war. Goldstone's UN-mandated report dealt with the three-week attack that left some 1,400 Palestinians and 13 Israelis dead.
President Mahmoud Abbas' decision, under US pressure, to delay a vote in the UN Human Rights Council on Goldstone's report provoked a political crisis, including calls for Abbas to step down, and for the dissolution of the PA. Rights groups slammed Abbas for harming their efforts to bring accused war criminals to justice.
Now Falk says Abbas' men have done the same to his own report. He says the PA-appointed ambassador to the UN in Geneva, Ibrahim Khreishah, put forward a resolution in a recent plenary session of the Human Rights Council which delayed a discussion of his own report on Israeli rights violations from March until June. The resolution passed unanimously.
Falk, a Princeton international law expert, said he is "not happy" about the PA's actions, but has no plans to resign. "I feel that it's very important not to succumb to this pressure."
The delay of Falk's report also caught the attention of Hamas leaders in Gaza. On Monday, The justice minister in the Hamas-controlled government in Gaza, Muhammad Faraj Al-Ghoul, held a news conference denouncing the delay as an effort to "kill the report and give Israel a cover for its crimes."
It is entirely possible that Falk is making this entire thing up. He has an exaggerated sense of self-worth and he has lied multiple times before.
Even so, it highlights that UN officials are more closely aligned with how Hamas views the Middle East than how the US does.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten