Het Wikileaks document over hoe Israel de ecenomie van de Gazastrook bewust zwak wilde houden, is natuurlijk weer gefundens fressen voor de antizionisten. Zie je wel! We zeiden het altijd al! Israel wilde de Gazanen net niet uithongeren en hun leven zo ellendig mogelijk maken alleen maar omdat ze van hun democratische recht gebruik hadden gemaakt om een genocidale organisatie aan de macht te helpen die Israel de oorlog verklaarde.
Ik ben niet zo positief over de blokkade als Barry Rubin, en ik denk dat het inderdaad ook een tegengesteld effect had (naast het daadwerkelijk verzwakken van Hamas, dat flink in populariteit is achteruit gegaan). Welk effect het sterkst was geweest als het Westen het niet steeds voor Gaza (en dus Hamas) had opgenomen, en of het was gelukt om Hamas op die manier af te (laten) zetten, zullen we waarschijnlijk nooit weten. Het is bovendien altijd een duivels dilemma in hoeverre de burgerbevolking mag lijden onder sancties tegen een misdadig regime, en of Israel daarin te ver ging is ook niet eenduidig te zeggen. Blokkades tegen vijandige landen zijn legitiem, en Hamas verklaarde Israel de oorlog. Maar Gaza is geen land, en daardoor meer afhankelijk van buitenlandse hulp. De internationale gemeenschap had echter, in plaats van alleen Israel te bekritiseren, meer kunnen doen om Hamas tegen te werken en de wapensmokkel tegen te gaan. En de VS had natuurlijk nooit mogen toestaan dat Hamas, een racistische en terroristische organisatie, aan de verkiezingen deelnam, iets wat tegen de Oslo Akkoorden indruiste.
RP
---------
Wikileaks on Gaza Shows Israeli Policy and Why It Made Sense
By Barry Rubin
A new Wikileaks document is being spun by some media to imply something critical about Israel's policy in the Gaza Strip. In fact, the secret cable shows the exact opposite. It also shows that what I've been writing on the subject was 100 percent accurate.
The U.S. State Department cable dated November 3, 2008, says that the goal of Israel's sanctions on the Gaza Strip was to keep Gaza's economy functioning at the lowest possible level without causing a humanitarian crisis.
Precisely:
1. Israel wanted to keep the economy weak in order to reduce public support for the Hamas regime to the minimum possible level.
2. Israel wanted to keep the economy weak in order to keep Hamas as weak as possible so that it could not easily stage war on Israel or expand its influence into the West Bank or Egypt.
3. Israel did not want the people of Gaza to face hunger or serious deprivation based on existing living standards.
That all makes sense. It is in line with centuries of precedent and the policies of all democratic nations facing adversaries in a wartime situation.
Moreover since Hamas is a repressive, terrorist, genocidal-intended group that is a client of Iran and seeks to subvert almost all Arab governments, that policy does a service for the people of Gaza, Arab governments (notably the Palestinian Authority and Egypt), and Western interests.
BUT now that the sanctions have been minimized due to Western pressure and the urgings of well-intentioned but badly informed people:
--Hamas will be in power forever in Gaza.
--It will repress women, chase out Christians, and teach young people to grow up to be terrorists and suicide bombers.
--It will siphon off money for revolutionary subversive activities.
--It will block any possible negotiations for Israel-Palestinian peace.
--It is better able to subvert and perhaps some day take over the West Bank.
--It is better able to help revolutionary Islamists and terrorists in Egypt.
--The Hamas regime gives Iran a client state on the Mediterranean.
This is a step forward? A humanitarian victory? Don't think so.
So far, every single Wikileaks document--released by people who hate Israel (at least one of the Wikileaks staffer being a known extremist antisemitic nut)--has made Israel look good and has proven that its analysis of regional politics has been correct.
A new Wikileaks document is being spun by some media to imply something critical about Israel's policy in the Gaza Strip. In fact, the secret cable shows the exact opposite. It also shows that what I've been writing on the subject was 100 percent accurate.
The U.S. State Department cable dated November 3, 2008, says that the goal of Israel's sanctions on the Gaza Strip was to keep Gaza's economy functioning at the lowest possible level without causing a humanitarian crisis.
Precisely:
1. Israel wanted to keep the economy weak in order to reduce public support for the Hamas regime to the minimum possible level.
2. Israel wanted to keep the economy weak in order to keep Hamas as weak as possible so that it could not easily stage war on Israel or expand its influence into the West Bank or Egypt.
3. Israel did not want the people of Gaza to face hunger or serious deprivation based on existing living standards.
That all makes sense. It is in line with centuries of precedent and the policies of all democratic nations facing adversaries in a wartime situation.
Moreover since Hamas is a repressive, terrorist, genocidal-intended group that is a client of Iran and seeks to subvert almost all Arab governments, that policy does a service for the people of Gaza, Arab governments (notably the Palestinian Authority and Egypt), and Western interests.
BUT now that the sanctions have been minimized due to Western pressure and the urgings of well-intentioned but badly informed people:
--Hamas will be in power forever in Gaza.
--It will repress women, chase out Christians, and teach young people to grow up to be terrorists and suicide bombers.
--It will siphon off money for revolutionary subversive activities.
--It will block any possible negotiations for Israel-Palestinian peace.
--It is better able to subvert and perhaps some day take over the West Bank.
--It is better able to help revolutionary Islamists and terrorists in Egypt.
--The Hamas regime gives Iran a client state on the Mediterranean.
This is a step forward? A humanitarian victory? Don't think so.
So far, every single Wikileaks document--released by people who hate Israel (at least one of the Wikileaks staffer being a known extremist antisemitic nut)--has made Israel look good and has proven that its analysis of regional politics has been correct.
======
Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. His latest books are The Israel-Arab Reader (seventh edition), The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East (Wiley), and The Truth About Syria (Palgrave-Macmillan). The website of the GLORIA Center is at http://www.gloria-center.org and of his blog, Rubin Reports, http://www.rubinreports.blogspot.com .
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten