Waarom zijn de media zoveel kritischer over Israel dan over Arabische staten en de Palestijnen? Hier een antwoord van Ethan Bronner, correspondent voor de New York Times. Het is niet de enige reden denk ik, maar wel een die vaak over het hoofd wordt gezien en waarover de journalisten zelf ook eerlijker zouden moeten zijn.
Het idiote is dat antizionisten en ook veel journalisten juist Israels klimaat tegenover buitenlandse journalisten hekelen, en niet het gebrek aan openheid en de tegenwerking die men in veel Arabische staten ondervindt.
RP
-------------
Sunday, January 02, 2011
New York Times' Ethan Bronner On The Difference Between Covering Israel And The Arab World
I missed this when it first came out in February, but fortunately CAMERA did not. Ethan Bronner, the Jerusalem Bureau Chief of the New York Times gave a talk at the Brandeis University on February 2, 2010--during which Ethan Bronner spoke about how open Israel is to journalists and how closed the Arab world is:
But maybe it would be more believable if the media itself would admit to the problem.
There is an audiocast of Bronner's talk, with Q&A afterwards.
And when you arrive for example in Israel as a reporter you go to the government press office they give you a list of the phone numbers of all the ministries and within about five minutes you can get the cell phone numbers of the various ministers and that is not true in Palestine or in the Arab world generally. You will get phone numbers for people, but there isn't that same robust debate. There is very little investigative journalism, basically none, in Palestine and there are no columnists complaining about the situation the way they are in Israel.Yes, it is unbelievable.
And since we as foreign correspondents spend our time sort of creaming off the conversation that goes on inside a society, it means there's a lot to cream on one side and very little to cream on on the other. This means that when you or others complain about unfair coverage of Israel, my advice would be "Don't complain about our not writing positive things about Israel. Complain about our not writing enough negative things about their enemies" because I think therein lies the imbalance which is difficult and does need to be corrected. It's hard to do because one society is more closed than the other and to remind you we rely on we live off controversy and tension. So Israel, you know, is all day long exposing itself with those questions.
...In the rest of the Arab world, it's very difficult to get into a lot of countries, to Sudan, to Syria, to Saudi Arabia, to Iran.
The Times has had enormous difficulty to get into Iran since the election. And before the election there were two years that went by before we could get into Iran and so there is an imbalance there too, in terms of our coverage in the region.
And the other problem is that once you get inside once you do get your 10-day visa, it's quite common for you to ask to see people and not get to see anybody significant and on the ninth day of your 10-day visa you'll get a phone call telling you that the deputy agricultural minister will happy to be have tea with you on your way to the airport the next day, so it's quite problematic in terms of getting real information from the rest of the region.
It's not true in Jordan. It's not true in Lebanon. It's not true everywhere. It is true in much of the region and it's a problem. And of course in those societies there isn't a great deal of self-examination. It's against the law in some places and so what you find in the press of the Arab world is a discussion of what's going on in Israel.
It's unbelievable.
But maybe it would be more believable if the media itself would admit to the problem.
There is an audiocast of Bronner's talk, with Q&A afterwards.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten