donderdag 11 april 2013

'Joodse terrorist' Jack Teitel veroordeeld tot 2x levenslang

 

Vaak wordt beweerd dat Israel de eigen extremisten niet aanpakt, en dat als mensen al worden opgepakt ze er met zeer lichte straffen vanaf komen. In dit geval klopt dat in elk geval niet. Professor Zeev Sternhell, die deze man heeft proberen te vermoorden vanwege zijn felle kritiek op de kolonisten, zei over de uitspraak:

 

Prof. Sternhell said, "The ruling is just, important, deterring and a sign that the courts will not sit quietly in the face of politically and ideologically motivated murders. This ruling has significance exceeding the bounds of this specific case. Teitel is not just another lunatic. He is a result of his surroundings.

 

Terwijl Israel Joden die Palestijnen vermoorden, zwaar bestraft, gelden Palestijnen die Joden vermoorden onder de Palestijnen als helden. Zij worden niet gestraft maar krijgen een heldenstatus en president Abbas heeft opnieuw de vrijlating van een aantal gevangenen geëist als voorwaarde om te gaan onderhandelen over vrede. Het gaat om mernsen die lange straffen uitzitten en vaak bij dodelijke aanslagen betrokken waren.

 

RP

-------

 

'Jewish terrorist' Jack Teitel sentenced to 2 life terms

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4365979,00.html

Teitel convicted of two counts of first degree murder of Palestinians; two counts attempted murder; illegal possession of firearm; incitement to violence. Victims: 'He got what he deserved'

Aviel Mengazi

Latest Update: 

04.09.13, 18:44 / Israel News

 

 

"Jewish terrorist" Jack (Yakov) Teitel, who was convicted of two counts of first degree murder of two Palestinians, in addition to a long list other violent offences, was sentenced Tuesday to two life sentences and an additional 30 years in jail by a Jerusalem District Court. Before sentencing Teitel claimed he did not regret his actions.

 

The judges rejected the defense's request for a reduced sentence on the basis of Teitel's mental state and, in addition, the court ruled that Teitel will pay the two victims' families NIS 180,000 (roughly $50,000) each in compensation; he was also ordered to pay two people he was convicted of attempting to murder NIS 150,000 (roughly $41,000) each in damages.

 

Related stories:

 

Teitel, a US immigrant, confessed to the killings, which he committed while visiting as a tourist. He was convicted in January of killing a Palestinian taxi driver in Jerusalem and a shepherd near the West Bank city of Hebron.

 

Teitel, who received the infamous nickname the "Jewish terrorist," was charged with 10 different offences, the most severe of which were two counts of murder in the first degree, two counts of attempted murder, illegal possession and assembling of a firearm and incitement to violence.

 

During sentencing, Judges Zvi Segal, Moshe Drori and Moshe Cohen ruled that his mental condition had no influence on his actions and hence he would be held fully accountable for them.

 


Judges: Teitel 'accountable for actions' (Photo: Gil Yochanan)

 

"There is no doubt in our hearts that there is no causal link between his actions and his mental condition. Hence, we have decided to convict him of the actions attributed to him," the judges said in the ruling. 

 

Hatred in the first degree

The first murder for which Teitel was convicted took place in 1997. The deceased, Samir Akram Balbisi, was working at the time as a taxi driver, offered to drive Teitel to wherever he pleased.

 

Teitel agreed, entered Balbisi's vehicle and then ordered the Palestinian to drive him to a certain location. When he saw that Balbisi's eyes were on the road he shot him point blank in the head.

 

Three months later Teitel decided to kill again. He searched for a victim in the village of Susya and found a shepherd, Issa Jabarin. As Jabarin passed Teital he fired two shots, both from short range, in Jabarin's direction, hitting him in the chest.

 

Teital was also convicted of incitement to violence and terror after he printed posters calling for the murder of members of the LGBT community, promising NIS 20,000 (roughly $5,500) for the person willing to kill "Sodom and Gomorra."

 

He was also charged with planting an explosive device inside a plant near the entrance to Prof. Zeev Sternhell's house in September 2008.

 

Sternhell, a world renowned professor of political science, an Israel Prize laureate and a peace activist, was wounded in his leg when the device exploded.

 

He was additionally charged with the attempted murder of the youth Ami Ortiz in 2008. Teitel placed an explosive device inside a gift basket intended for the boy's father, David Ortiz, with the intent of killing him, because the man served as the head of the messianic Jewish community.

 

The family's maid unknowingly took the booby trapped gift basket into the house, leading the boy to open it, prompting the bomb to go off. The boy was severely wounded throughout his body.

 

In response to the sentence, Prof. Zeev Sternhell said: "The ruling is sign to all those who think that this is the way to get results- Teitel or his friends."

 

Regarding compensation, Prof. Sternhell said: "I don't want any damages from this man, and I don't need anything. I happy that I was only lightly wounded."

 

According to Teitel, Prof. Sternhell, who is known for his outspoken left wing opinions, gained his attention after he allegedly called for the death of settlers.

  

Prof. Sternhell said, "The ruling is just, important, deterring and a sign that the courts will not sit quietly in the face of politically and ideologically motivated murders. This ruling has significance exceeding the bounds of this specific case. Teitel is not just another lunatic. He is a result of his surroundings.

 

"He actualized what others want to do themselves, many who wanted to do the same to me. I know this because of the letters and phone calls I received during that time. This violence needs to be cut off at the stem, even that which currently is rampant in the occupied territories. If not, this violence will seep into every aspect of our society."

 

A number of the victims' relatives arrived at the court for the sentencing.

 

Ibrahim Balbisi, the father of Akram Balbisi, whom Teitel murdered, said upon hearing the sentence: "There is justice. It hurts my heart every day my son is not with us. Day and night we cannot sleep, our thoughts always wander to Akram. I am happy the sentence sends this killer to jail for the rest of his life."

 

Leah Ortiz, Ami's mother, said: "We are very happy that Teitel received many years behind bars. He said he is proud of what he did and would do it again; he is a dangerous man, full of hate – jail is where he belongs."

 

Yossi Greiber, Ortiz's lawyer, expressed anger at the fact that the State refuses to recognize the family as a victim of a terror attack and afford them the financial assistance such victims enjoy.

 

"We are left with the pain and wounds. They boy is 20 years old and will require medical treatment for the rest of his life. Despite the fact that the background of the attack is identical to that of the deaths of the Palestinians, as the court itself claimed, the State refuses to grant us assistance," the lawyer said.

 

Lawyers Asher Ohayon and Michael Ironi, who represented Teitel, claimed the court ignored the complexity of their client's mental state, opting for the easy solution.

 

"Eight doctors, some who work for the State, think differently from the court (about Teitel's mental condition), but instead of dealing with this issue the court choose to ignore it. Teitel didn't kill because of hatred, he has visions, he received orders which he felt he had to follow. And these resulted from a mental condition that had developed early in his childhood," one of the lawyers said. 

 

Sagi Ofir, for the prosecution, said: "The criminal was sent to jail for the rest of his life, as he deserved. The court affirmed the message towards those who turn to terror. We can only hope this will serve as a deterrent to those who wish to engage in terror activities."

 

 

dinsdag 9 april 2013

Palestijnen bezoeken Yad Vashem

 
'Combatants for Peace' is één van de goede initiatieven die daadwerkelijk een brug willen slaan tussen Joden en Arabieren, Israeli's en Palestijnen, om begrip te kweken aan beide zijden en toenadering te zoeken. Een bezoek van Palestijnen aan Yad Vashem is een initiatief dat op grotere schaal navolging verdient.
 
Wouter
_______________
 
 
Palestinians visit Yad Vashem: 'A tragedy beyond words'

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4363898,00.html

Bassam Aramin, whose 10-year-old daughter was killed by IDF rubber bullet, visits Jerusalem's Holocaust museum, says 'I surely can identify with feeling like a refugee – humiliated, weak, lost – but the tragedy of the Holocaust is very different'

Noam (Dabul) Dvir

Published: 

04.04.13, 11:11 / Israel News

Ahmed al-Jaafari, a 43-year-old Deheishe refugee camp resident, stands opposite the list of Jews who were sent to the Sobibor death camp. At a certain point, he turns to the guide, Roee Hanani, and asks "why did they keep such an organized list if they planned on killing them all along?"

 

Hanani replied him in Arabic "the Nazis were very organized. They believed that they were solving a world problem and wanted to take pride in what they did."

  

As part of a unique "Combatants for Peace" trip to Yad Vashem, eight Palestinian Authority residents visited the museum to learn of the fates of European Jews during the Holocaust.

 

"This was a jolting experience for me," said al-Jaafari. "I saw the reactions of people who were here and wanted to experience it for myself. I heard and read about and saw movies on the Holocaust, but nothing comes close to a visit in which I can see it with my own eyes. I don't understand how the world conspired a crime like this." 


Palestinians visit Yad Vashem (Photo: Gil Yohanan)

 

Al-Jaafari continued by making a few comments with which Jews can identify, but likely to cause Palestinians to become irate. "When you look at the background of the Jewish nation, you can try to understand your anxiety and fears. A nation that went through something like this cannot live without scars. I don't agree with the comparison between the Holocaust and the situation in the territories, and people who make this comparison make it out of pain and anger."

 

"Combatants for Peace" was established by a group of Israelis and Palestinians who participated in what they call the "circle of violence" in the region," and have now abandoned their weapons in favor of peace and coexistence.

 

However, not all the Palestinians who registered for the tour, made it to Yad Vashem. This is due to the difficulties they had attaining entrance visas into Israel.

No Arab Righteous Gentiles

Upon arrival to the station dedicated to the Righteous Gentiles, Hanani told the participants about a devout Muslim couple that hid the Jewish Habilio family in their home in Sarajevo. The couple also took the father in, who managed to escape a labor camp. The Habilio family immigrated to Israel in 1984 and turned to Yad Vashem; bringing recognition to the Hardega family as Righteous Gentiles.

 

The story did not end there. During the civil war which saw the collapse of Yugoslavia in the 1990s, Sarajevo was under massive attack. Yad Vashem and the Joint Distribution Committee brought Zaynba Hardega to Israel with her daughter, son-in-law and granddaughter. Zayba has since passed away, but the rest of the family still lives in Jerusalem.

 

Hanani explained to the group that there are still no Arab Righteous Gentiles, but the relevant committee is currently discussing a few cases in which North African citizens saved Jews during World War II.

 

"I began taking an interest in the Holocaust 20 years ago when I saw the movie 'Schindler's List,' said Bassam Aramin, who organized the tour on the Palestinian side. "Since then, I have seen it four times."

 

"Less than a month ago I was at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington. When you arrive at a place like this, you forget who you are. This is a tragedy that cannot be described in words."

 

Some five years ago, Aramin's 10-year-old daughter was killed by an IDF rubber bullet. When he hears comparisons being made between the territories and the European Holocaust, he becomes indignant.

 

"This is a big mistake. These are very different things. As a person who lives under occupation, I surely can identify with feeling like a refugee – humiliated, weak, lost – but the tragedy of the Holocaust is very different," said Aramin.

 

Nabil, another participant, said that he didn't think twice about joining the tour. "As soon as I was called I said I was coming. I heard a lot about the Holocaust and wanted to see Yad Vashem with my own eyes. I am not afraid of reactions from the Palestinian side. I think that everyone needs to come here and see it with their own eyes."

 

 

maandag 8 april 2013

John Kerry wil uitgaan van Arabisch Vredesplan met aanpassingen

 
John Kerry wacht de ondankbare taak waarin velen voor hem al gefaald hebben:

Officials say Kerry has proposed two small changes to make it more palatable to Israel. He wants language saying the 1967 lines can be modified through mutual agreement and providing stronger security guarantees. 

But Erekat said the plan could not be changed.

Voor Israel was het Arabische vredesplan niet aanvaardbaar zonder ruimte voor gebiedsuitwisseling, harde toezeggingen voor Israels veiligheid en normalisatie van betrekkingen, en een eenduidige afstand van het vermeende Arabische 'recht op terugkeer'; de Arabieren brachten het echter steeds als een eindbod waarover verder niet te onderhandelen viel.

 

Wouter

______________

 

 

Kerry meets Israeli leaders to push Mideast peace

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4365345,00.html

Following meetings with PA's Abbas, US secretary of state meets with President Peres, PM Netanyahu in hopes of ending Israeli-Palestinian stalemate

Associated Press

Published: 

04.08.13, 13:04 / Israel News

US Secretary of State John Kerry is looking to breathe new life into dormant Mideast peace talks in meetings Monday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other senior Israeli and Palestinian officials, amid talk of modifying a decade-old Arab plan that's long been greeted with skepticism by the Jewish state.

 

A day after meeting one-on-one with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Kerry spent the morning of Israel's Holocaust Memorial Day at Yad Vashem, laying down a red, white and blue wreath at the nation's official monument for the 6 million Jews murdered during World War II.

 

Related stories:

 

He was to meet privately Monday with Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and Israeli President Shimon Peres, before a dinner with Netanyahu and other Israeli officials.

 

Kerry is trying to end a 4 1/2-year stalemate between the Israelis and Palestinians during which they've hardly negotiated peace at all. Making his third trip to the region in a period of two weeks, he has yet to outline any new plan but U.S. officials say he is exploring several ideas to try to corral both sides back into direct talks.

 

Palestinian and Arab officials have pointed to one idea in particular: An attempt to revive, with modifications, the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative that offered a comprehensive peace with Israel for a pullout from territories captured in the 1967 Mideast war.

 

The officials say Kerry is seeking greater Arab-Israeli security commitments and softer language on borders as part of the plan.

 

But key obstacles remain. Israel has not softened its objections and the Palestinians say they turned down a request from Kerry for the proposed changes.

 

Kerry and Abbas met for an hour behind closed doors in Ramallah on Sunday evening, where they discussed "the path to peace," according to a senior State Department official. Beforehand, US and Palestinian officials met in a larger format to discuss strategies for economic growth in the Palestinian territories and how to best create a "positive climate for negotiations." The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of Kerry's orders not to brief reporters.

 

US officials refused to comment specifically on the initiative, which was revolutionary when it was introduced by Saudi Arabia's then crown prince, King Abdullah, and later endorsed by the 22-member Arab League at a summit in Beirut. However, it was overshadowed by fierce Israeli-Palestinian fighting at the time and never won Israel's support. The Arab League re-endorsed the offer in 2007 and technically it remains in effect.

 

In the 1967 war, Israel took control of the West Bank, east Jerusalem, Gaza Strip, Sinai and Golan Heights. Israeli returned the Sinai to Egypt in 1982 in the framework of a peace treaty and pulled out of Gaza unilaterally in 2005. Israel annexed the Golan Heights in 1981 and peace talks with Syria over the territory have repeatedly failed.

 

Israeli-Palestinian peace talks have been deadlocked since late 2008, in large part over the issue of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem. The Palestinians refuse to talk while Israel settles its population on the occupied territories where they want to establish their state. They have demanded that Israel accept the 1967 lines as the basis for a future Palestine, but Netanyahu rejects a return to the 1967 lines and calls for talks with no preconditions.

 

Abbas spokesman, Nabil Abu Rdeneh, said the Palestinian leader called for a solution based on the 1967 lines in his Sunday meeting with Kerry. He did not say whether the Arab peace initiative was discussed but confirmed Abbas was leaving Monday for talks on the plan at an Arab League meeting in Qatar.

 

There, a special committee will hold an "urgent meeting" on the subject Monday, said Mohammed Subeih, the Arab League's undersecretary for Palestinian affairs. Qatar's prime minister will chair it and the foreign ministers of key countries such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the Palestinians will participate.

 

Subeih said the committee would form a delegation led by Arab League chief Nabil El-Araby and the Qatari prime minister to travel to Washington in the coming weeks with the goal of drawing a new roadmap to "end Israeli occupation."

 

The chief Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erekat, said Kerry has been floating the Arab initiative as a possible way out of the deadlock.

 

Officials say Kerry has proposed two small changes to make it more palatable to Israel. He wants language saying the 1967 lines can be modified through mutual agreement and providing stronger security guarantees.

 

But Erekat said the plan could not be changed.

 

"Kerry asked us to change a few words in the Arab Peace Initiative but we refused," he told the Voice of Palestine radio station on Sunday.

 

Israeli officials refused to comment on the matter.

 

Ben Gurion's eis voor een Joods leger om tegen de nazi's te vechten

 
Er wordt wel eens beweerd door antizionisten dat de zionisten niets gelegen was aan de Europese Joden die het slachtoffer werden van de Holocaust, en soms wordt zelfs vals gesuggereerd dat het hen wel goed uitkwam voor hun politieke doelen. Als enige structurele oplossing voor antisemitisme en vervolging zagen ze inderdaad een eigen staat en daarmee de mogelijkheid om hun eigen belangen te dienen en hun eigen volk te verdedigen. Binnen die visie deed men wat men kon om met de beperkte mogelijkheden Joden uit de klauwen van de Duivel te redden, inclusief een pact met die duivel.
 
Wouter
_______________
 
 
1942: Ben Gurion's censored demand for Jewish army

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4365298,00.html

IDF archives reveal David Ben Gurion's demand from Allied Forces of Jewish army to fight Nazis; else, he warns, 'Your hands will be soaked in Jewish blood'; excerpts censored by British now published

Roi Mandel

Published: 

04.08.13, 11:57 / Israel News

"In the name of all Jews, we demand of you, rulers of England, Russia and the United States, our right for a Jewish army," thus David Ben Gurion opened his 1942 speech calling on the allied forces to let Jews form an independent force to fight the Nazis.

 

The speech was revealed in its entirety by the IDF archives and the Defense Ministry, including the parts rejected by the British censor for hinting at Jewish independence.

 

Related stories:

 

The bold text, including the opening phrases, are the parts erased by the censor. The full speech will be made available online by the IDF.


David Ben Gurion (Photo: AFP)

 

The speech continues: "… Our right to fight the greatest of our enemies as Jews, in a Jewish framework, Jewish organization, Jewish headquarters, Jewish discipline and under a Jewish flag.


The speech, courtesy of the IDF archives and Defense Ministry

 

"Our needs will not be met by the crumbs allowed us here to protect our homeland and the surrounding countries."

 

Hitler's regime, Ben Gurion foresaw, would be vanquished, but "we do not know if the victory of democracy, liberty and justice will not find in Europe an immense cemetery strewn with the bones of our people, men and women, old and young."


 

He continues: "The Jewish people's delegates are called today to challenge from Zion, before the world, the spilling of our Jewish blood"

 

He does not know how many were already killed and how, Ben Gurion said, but their massacre "is due solely for one sin, that these are Jews. For only Jews have no protector, no warrior."

 

But Ben Gurion's call for outright independence and criticism of the British was rejected by the censor: "For Jews have no standing, state emblem, no Jewish military, no Jewish independence and no free and safe homeland."

 

Ben Gurion pled the allied forces' leaders to "prevent the annihilation of a jailed, shackled, defenseless nation," and urged them to allow Jewish children to immigrate to Palestine.

 

"Reject the disgraceful edicts to the effect that a Jew from an enemy state isn't allowed to return to his homeland. As long as this shameful decree exists, as long as our land's gates are shut to Yisrael's refugees, your hands will be soaked in Jewish blood, spilled in the Nazi inferno."

 

In the speech, Ben Gurion demands the British to allow Jews to fight the Nazis as a Jewish army: "Every Jew will carry proudly the yellow star, and if we meet our brother from the Nazi ghettos we'll carry them on our arms with the yellow star. It will be a flag of honor, a mark of martyrs and saints.

 

"Not the Nazis, but you, civilized nations, are dishonoring us when you deprive our right as a people, an equal nation, of our right to fight Hitler as Jews."

 

Ben Gurion's demand was not for an auxiliary force, such as the Jewish Brigade Group, but for an independent Jewish army, a demand which was also censored: "We want to fight as a Jewish army. All Jews who aren't duty bound to enlist in some other military, all Jews free to do as they please, we demand their human right, we demand their honorable right to enlist in a Jewish army under a Jewish flag, as an equal partner to the allied forces."

 

At the speech's climax Ben Gurion calls for Jewish independence in Palestine: "And we demand not only our right to fight as Jews, we demand the right that every nation in world has, be it big or small, for an independent homeland.

 

"All the unnecessary victims, all the thousand, hundreds of thousands and maybe millions of victims are the product of discrimination of the Jewish nation.

 

"These are the victims of a nation which has no country and no freedom. We demand of you to correct this wrong: Equal national standing, homeland and independence for the Jewish people."

 

Ben Gurion concluded: "We'll do what we can to avenge you and we'll give ourselves no quarter until we save you from the Nazis and from the atrophying Diaspora, and we'll bring you, all of you, to us, to our salvaged land." 

 

Jodenhaat groeit in landen Scandinavië

 

Een bericht van vorige maand. Soms(?) lijken de christelijke kranten antisemitisme serieuzer te nemen dan de grote seculiere dagbladen.

 

______________

 

 

Jodenhaat groeit in landen Scandinavië

http://www.refdag.nl/nieuws/buitenland/jodenhaat_groeit_in_landen_scandinavie_1_722513

13-03-2013 15:03 | Reinier Zoutendijk

 

De Israëlische ambassadeur in Denemarken raadde Joden onlangs af om in het openbaar Hebreeuws te spreken of een keppeltje te dragen. In de Scandinavische landen groeit het antisemitisme. Joden vertrekken zelfs uit angst naar andere landen. 

 

De Scandinavische landen hebben allemaal relatief links-liberale regeringen, die een steeds soepeler immigratiepolitiek voeren. Liet Noorwegen bijvoorbeeld vroeger slechts een zeer beperkt aantal immigranten toe, van deze strenge regels is nog nu maar weinig over. 

 

De Noorse bevolking groeit met bijna 1 procent per jaar. De helft van die groei bestaat uit immigranten. Een aanzienlijk deel van hen komt uit Zweden, maar de immigranten uit het Midden-Oosten en Pakistan vormen toch de meerderheid.

De groeiende islamitische gemeenschap in Scandinavië is grotendeels verantwoordelijk voor het antisemitisme in de regio. De versoepeling van de immigratieregels komt door de nadruk op tolerantie. Maar voor de Joden betekent dit juist intolerantie. 

 

Ontkerkelijking

Landen als Noorwegen, Zweden en Denemarken behoren tot de meest seculiere van Europa. Denemarken kent nog een staatskerk, in Zweden is deze in 2000 afgeschaft, in Noorwegen in 2012.

In Zweden leidde dit sinds 2000 tot een daling van ongeveer 10 procent van het totaal aantal christenen. Van de 72 procent die nog wel officieel als christen te boek staat, is slechts 2 procent actief kerkganger.

Omdat steeds minder Zweden bewust christen zijn, daalt ook het aantal mensen dat via de Bijbel het principe van liefde en compassie voor het Joodse volk en de staat Israël meekrijgt. Diezelfde trend is ook in de rest van Scandinavië te zien. Ook daar is een groeiende moslimbevolking. Het percentage moslims onder de Scandinavische bevolking is nu zo'n 4 procent. 

 

Angst

De steeds agressievere islamitische gemeenschap heeft de overheden van Zweden en Denemarken in een greep van angst. De autoriteiten durven de radicale extremisten geen halt toe te roepen, onder het mom van „tolerantie."

De politie van Kopenhagen gaf in een interview met Michael Gelvan, de voorzitter van de Joodse veiligheidsraad Nordic, te kennen dat er in Kopenhagen buurten zijn waarin de politie niet in uniform optreedt.

In de Zweedse stad Malmö wonen 600 Joden, tegenover 60.000 moslims. Het antisemitisme groeit daar met de dag: van naroepen op straat en graven bekladden tot het brandstichten in Joodse gebouwen en in elkaar slaan van Joden. De reactie van de burgemeester, Ilmar Reepalu: „De samenleving moet zich van de Joden distantiëren. Zij zijn zelf verantwoordelijk voor hoe ze door de samenleving gezien worden." Van represailles tegenover de misdadigers is zelden sprake.

De Joden zelf voelen zich ook niet veilig en zijn bang. Sommigen van hen vertrekken uit Scandinavië omdat ze in de landen daar geen toekomst zien voor Joden, anderen omdat ze weggepest of bedreigd zijn in hun buurt.

De Israëlische ambassadeur in Denemarken, Arthur Avnon, raadde eind vorig jaar Joden af in het openbaar een keppeltje te dragen of Hebreeuws te spreken. Hoe tolerant Scandinavië ook op papier mag zijn, voor de Joodse gemeenschap wordt het daar steeds moeilijker haar eigen leven te leiden. 

 

Bewapening

Een groep islamitische extremisten heeft van de Noorse overheid jachtvergunningen gekregen. Naar eigen zeggen „voor vreedzame doeleinden, om in de bossen aan de hectiek van alledag te kunnen ontsnappen." Het gevolg is echter wel dat in een land waar de politie standaard geen wapens bij zich heeft –zoals bleek bij de terreuraanslag in de zomer van 2011– deze extremisten zomaar met maximaal zes vuurwapens mogen rondlopen.

Ervin Kohn, voorzitter van de Joodse gemeenschap in Oslo, heeft zijn onrust over deze ontwikkeling uitgesproken. „Vorig jaar is de synagoge in Oslo al beschoten. Ook was er brandstichting bij de Israëlische ambassade. Nu de groep die gevaarlijk voor ons is, legaal in het bezit is van wapens, zal de situatie er zeker niet veiliger op worden."

 

Antisemitisme in Nederland?

 
Een buitenlandse blik op ons land geeft soms zaken niet correct weer, maar kan ook verhelderend zijn...
 
________________

 

Anti-Semitism in the Netherlands?

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContributors/Article.aspx?ID=308210&R=R1&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

By BARRY RUBIN

03/30/2013 22:40

Despite Dutch history, the growing trend of European anti-Semitism is pervading through the Netherlands.

 
 

 

A few years ago in Amsterdam I was shown the most popular manual published in the Netherlands, in Dutch, on how to raise one’s children as proper Muslims. The book included virulently anti-Semitic passages, based on Muslim holy texts. After the Jewish community objected, the authorities forced the publisher to put white tape over the offending passages. The tape could easily be peeled off by purchases so that these words could be read.

Or consider what has just happened. A Turkish-Dutch researcher publicized systematic anti-Semitism among other Muslims in the Netherlands, including a dramatic video that showed teenage boys calling for genocide and praising Hitler.

What happened? The researcher, Mehmet Sahin, had to go into hiding after being accused by others of being a Jew and a Zionist.

The growing anti-Semitism in Western Europe is like that. The European Union, governments, and the media paste a white tape over the problem to conceal it or pretend to do something about it. But when one peels back the tape the hatred is revealed as growing and being passed onto the next generation.

While one doesn’t want to exaggerate rising anti-Semitism in Europe – mostly from Muslim immigrants and their children but facilitated and even reflected by the increasingly intellectually hegemonic Left – the growth of anti-Jewish hatred is enormous. Some people view this as fear-mongering, pointing to other developments that show the glass to be half full. Indeed, the hostility of European governments toward Israel has often been exaggerated. The situation is actually better than it was 20 or 30 years ago.

Yet the broader question is one of social trends and the behavior of institutions, especially the mass media and universities, which are generally becoming not just critical but viciously so of Israel and periodically Jews generally.

Take the Netherlands, a mild-mannered country that prides itself on moderation in all things. Traditionally, the Netherlands was friendly to Israel and while it has always had its anti-Semites and even, historically, fascists, it had far less proportionately than other European countries. In other words, if things are bad in the Netherlands, they’re really bad.

Last year, the chief rabbi of the Netherlands spoke in a published interview in which he spoke extensively about his love for the country, the good treatment of Jews there, and other such points. Asked at the end, however, whether there was any future for Jews in the country he said, “No,” and advised the community to move to Israel.

That doesn’t mean the Netherlands is a maelstrom of anti-Semitism. It isn’t. But there’s a growing anti-Semitic sector which consists of two parts: Muslim immigrants and their offspring, and the far left that is so often dominant in the Netherlands –as in other Western countries.

The Dutch government, unlike others in Europe, has defined Hezbollah as a terrorist group and while less favorable to Israel than its predecessor remains on good terms with Israel. Yet shocking slanders appear about Israel in the mainstream Dutch media.

To cite just one example, on March 17, 2010, NRC Handelsblad, Holland’s most prestigious newspaper, published a front-page article claiming the “Israel lobby” was threatening to defeat President Barack Obama’s health plan to blackmail him regarding his Israel policy. While statements on other matters by Israel’s government are evaluated in a cynical way, the basis for this story was a single left-wing blogger.

An observer who wants to avoid exaggerating the problem warns about: “A rising tide of anti-Semitism that the top level is unwilling to address out of a fear of being labeled a racist or out of a fear of losing the all-important Muslim vote,” which is vital for the Left in elections. There is no effective opposition in the political sphere. The center dithers; some on the right speak out but do nothing effective.

A Dutch person involved in inter-communal work adds: “I know many upstanding young Muslims who are as appalled by anti-Semitism,” and these voices should not be forgotten. It should also be remembered that there have been attacks on mosques over the years. In contrast, though, a moderate left politician described in great detail how her family was forced to leave their neighborhood by verbal and at times violent harassment by Muslim youths there.

The issue, then, is not just coming from Middle Eastern politics but also the tensions within Dutch society and how Muslim immigrants and their children interpret their problems. Endlessly told that the Jews are their enemy and that they control society in some way, it is easy to conclude that the Jews might also be behind the harassment or discrimination Muslims face, absurd as this is on a factual level and in countries where the Jewish population is tiny.

Here is how one observer recounted on this issue: “As a journalist I roamed the streets around high schools in Amsterdam the day after 9/11 to catch the ‘sound of the streets.’ I was totally unprepared for all the anti-Semitic remarks uttered by [Muslim] boys of 11 to 16 years. Later I spoke with teachers who told me this was an ongoing thing.

“I also interviewed a Moroccan in a high position. He said two things that struck me: ‘Since the beginning of TV transmissions in Morocco the news start with news about Palestine. You in the Netherlands will never understand the degree with which Moroccans identify with Palestine.’ 

‘My Moroccan friends [in the Netherlands] among teachers and intellectuals agree Israel has a right to exist, but we can never say that in public because we would lose the backing of our Moroccan [community].’”

Elma Drayer is a liberal Dutch columnist and former editor of the prestigious newspaper Trouw , writing on its site. She’s also Jewish. In an article, “The Taboo Against Antisemitism has Disappeared,” she expresses shock that nobody else seems to be shocked by a recent television program, on the Netherlands 2 station, in which a group of young Muslims, whose roots are in Turkey, are interviewed by a researcher. (Incidentally, in Dutch discussions the Turks are considered the relative moderates compared to the supposedly more radical immigrants from Morocco.) 

Only CIDI, the Jewish community’s lobbying group, noted the program, asking the minister of education in an open letter to undertake a national survey of anti- Semitic prejudice among high school students.

Drayer concludes (translation done for me): “For exactly 80 years after the greatest Jew hater of all time began, the taboo has disappeared.”

There’s a lot of evidence for this ranging from the chief rabbi’s conclusion that there was no future for Jews in the Netherlands to the wild ovations received from packed audiences for an anti-Israel, anti-Semitic film among Turkish immigrant audiences in the Netherlands.

Then, too, there’s the 2012, investigation by Lisa Nederveen in her MA thesis.

On the video, the well-intentioned interviewer tries to get the young people to tone down their criticism, a tactic which in itself shows the problem. He implies that it’s okay to kill just Jewish men. The young people disagree. He later says that many Jews disagree with Israel, implying that it is okay to kill Israelis and pro-Israel Jews. That’s still too moderate for them.

What particularly fascinates me is the young man’s quotation from Hitler. Where did he hear it? I don’t know precisely but I’ve read it repeatedly in Islamist propaganda. I’ll bet it came from there and not from neo-Nazi literature.

By knowing about Gypsies and disabled people, the boy shows clearly that he is by no means ignorant about the Nazi era, perhaps the result of instruction in school.

And, of course, completely apart from the Shoah, the Netherlands itself suffered greatly from Nazism. If genocide against the Jews was insufficient to make these young people dislike Hitler, you’d expect that some sense of Dutch patriotism might do so. Of course, that doesn’t happen.

Here’s the bottom line: Given the fact that this hatred is endemic among Dutch Muslims; and given the fact that their proportion and influence in the country is increasing; and given the fact that there are literally no countervailing forces, is this viewpoint going to increase or decrease? Obviously, the former.

Even in the Dutch mass media there are shocking things written on a regular basis about Jews and Israel. If one cannot depend on the Netherlands to defeat this trend, there’s nobody who’s going to do better.

Note: I want to thank the translators and Dutch friends who gave me helpful remarks and additional information on this article.

Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. His latest book, Israel: An Introduction , has just been published by Yale University Press. His blog is Rubin Reports. His original articles are published at PJMedia.