donderdag 6 januari 2011

Ethan Bronner over berichtgeving vanuit Israel en uit de Arabische wereld

 
Waarom zijn de media zoveel kritischer over Israel dan over Arabische staten en de Palestijnen? Hier een antwoord van Ethan Bronner, correspondent voor de New York Times. Het is niet de enige reden denk ik, maar wel een die vaak over het hoofd wordt gezien en waarover de journalisten zelf ook eerlijker zouden moeten zijn.
Het idiote is dat antizionisten en ook veel journalisten juist Israels klimaat tegenover buitenlandse journalisten hekelen, en niet het gebrek aan openheid en de tegenwerking die men in veel Arabische staten ondervindt.
 
RP
-------------
 
Sunday, January 02, 2011

New York Times' Ethan Bronner On The Difference Between Covering Israel And The Arab World

http://daledamos.blogspot.com/2011/01/new-york-times-ethan-bronner-on.html
 
 
I missed this when it first came out in February, but fortunately CAMERA did not. Ethan Bronner, the Jerusalem Bureau Chief of the New York Times gave a talk at the Brandeis University on February 2, 2010--during which Ethan Bronner spoke about how open Israel is to journalists and how closed the Arab world is:
And when you arrive for example in Israel as a reporter you go to the government press office they give you a list of the phone numbers of all the ministries and within about five minutes you can get the cell phone numbers of the various ministers and that is not true in Palestine or in the Arab world generally. You will get phone numbers for people, but there isn't that same robust debate. There is very little investigative journalism, basically none, in Palestine and there are no columnists complaining about the situation the way they are in Israel.

And since we as foreign correspondents spend our time sort of creaming off the conversation that goes on inside a society, it means there's a lot to cream on one side and very little to cream on on the other. This means that when you or others complain about unfair coverage of Israel, my advice would be "Don't complain about our not writing positive things about Israel. Complain about our not writing enough negative things about their enemies" because I think therein lies the imbalance which is difficult and does need to be corrected. It's hard to do because one society is more closed than the other and to remind you we rely on we live off controversy and tension. So Israel, you know, is all day long exposing itself with those questions.

...In the rest of the Arab world, it's very difficult to get into a lot of countries, to Sudan, to Syria, to Saudi Arabia, to Iran.

The Times has had enormous difficulty to get into Iran since the election. And before the election there were two years that went by before we could get into Iran and so there is an imbalance there too, in terms of our coverage in the region.

And the other problem is that once you get inside once you do get your 10-day visa, it's quite common for you to ask to see people and not get to see anybody significant and on the ninth day of your 10-day visa you'll get a phone call telling you that the deputy agricultural minister will happy to be have tea with you on your way to the airport the next day, so it's quite problematic in terms of getting real information from the rest of the region.

It's not true in Jordan. It's not true in Lebanon. It's not true everywhere. It is true in much of the region and it's a problem. And of course in those societies there isn't a great deal of self-examination. It's against the law in some places and so what you find in the press of the Arab world is a discussion of what's going on in Israel.

It's unbelievable.
Yes, it is unbelievable.
But maybe it would be more believable if the media itself would admit to the problem.

There is an audiocast of Bronner's talk, with Q&A afterwards.

Jawaher Abu Rahma nam geen deel aan Bi'ilin protest

Jawaher Abu Rahmah
 

Nog een bericht over Jawaher Abu Rahmah, de vrouw die afgelopen weekend bij een protest tegen de muur in Bili'in is omgekomen, volgens de Palestijnen door Israelisch traangas. Zoals wel vaker, is de zaak mistig en is veel onduidelijk. Volgens nieuwe getuigenissen van Palestijnen zou Abu Rahma niet bij de demonstratie zijn geweest, maar in de buurt hebben gestaan van een groepje jongeren die stenen gooiden naar het leger, waarop het leger traangas spoot in haar richting. Het blijft moeilijk voorstelbaar dat de concentratie zo hoog was dat zij daar, honderden meters van het leger verwijderd, aan kon sterven, zoals ook uit een eerder bericht bleek. Bovendien spreken de Palestijnse getuigen elkaar ook weer gedeeltelijk tegen. Het blijft allemaal zogezegd mistig.

Hoe dan ook, iedere dode is er een teveel en Israel kan op een gemakkelijke manier een einde aan deze wekelijkse protesten maken door het stuk muur bij Bili'in eindelijk te verplaatsen, waartoe het hooggerechtshof al in 2007 toe heeft bevolen. (Naar verluid is men met een nieuwe muur bezig en zal de huidige over enkele maanden worden afgebroken.)
 
RP
----------
 
According to rioters, Abu Rahma was 150-180 meters away
http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2011/01/according-to-rioters-abu-rahma-was-150.html
 
 
Ha'aretz published a map of the (one of many) Palestinian Arab version of events in Bil'in. I received a horrible fax copy of it (see here):

According to this version, Jawaher Abu Rahma was standing 150-180 meters away from the kids throwing stones who were hit with tear gas.

This is nearly two football fields away.

As we saw yesterday from the Physicians for Human Rights paper on tear gas, the immediate cloud produced is some 6-9 meters in diameter and even in the center of the cloud the concentrations of the agent are 3%-10% of the amount usually needed to be breathed in for a full minute to kill the average healthy person.

I can't find any studies on dissipation of CS gas outdoors but simple watching of videos of these demonstrations shows that the gas cloud dissipates within seconds (although the canister emits gas for maybe 10 seconds so if one was right next to the canister one could be exposed at the highest outdoor levels for perhaps 15 seconds.)

While I have no doubt that someone can smell tear gas from a greater distance and even that their eyes can tear from a whiff, the idea that tear gas is toxic from 150 meters is absurd. The entire town of Bil'in would have been wiped out years ago.

(h/t Yisrael Medad and SoccerDad)
-------------
 

Bil'in eyewitnesses: Woman killed by tear gas wasn't protesting
An investigation carried out by Haaretz, with the help of a number of eyewitnesses, concluded Abu Rahmah stood about 100 meters from her home, watching the protest.
By Avi Issacharoff
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/bil-in-eyewitnesses-woman-killed-by-tear-gas-wasn-t-protesting-1.335257
 
 
The Palestinian woman who died last weekend from smoke inhalation was indeed hurt by tear gas in Bil'in, according to new evidence provided to Haaretz. The evidence has also made it clear that the woman, Jawaher Abu Rahmah, 36, had been standing near youths throwing stones at Israeli soldiers on Friday.

This new information runs contrary to claims made in the media, which are allegedly based on military sources.

An investigation carried out by Haaretz on Monday, with the help of a number of eyewitnesses, has concluded Abu Rahmah did not participate in the main procession of the weekly demonstration against the West Bank separation fence, but instead stood about 100 meters from her home, watching the protest.

Two teenagers, Aslam and Ilham Fathi, said they were with Abu Rahmah when she was injured.

"I met with Jawaher at the entrance to the home of Abu Hamis [an uncle]," Aslam said. "She was speaking with her cousin, who is getting married. She suggested we go watch the procession, which was far from us, and we moved closer to the kids who were throwing stones at the army. The soldiers were quite far away, but they fired large amounts of gas and stinky water.

"Her mother called her to come back and I also thought it was enough. I didn't want us to go through what happened to Bassem," he continued, referring to Abu Rahmah's brother, who was killed at a protest in Bil'in in 2009.

"But the gas reached us. She was about half a meter from me. There was a lot of gas and I covered my eyes. I didn't see her until Ilham called to me, saying 'Come quickly, help me lift Jawaher.' She managed to call out, 'Call Samir [her brother] to take me to hospital. I'm going to die,'" Aslam said.

Ilham, on the other hand, says she was on the roof of Abu Rahmah's house when the incident occurred. After a cloud of gas approached them, she said, she climbed down and went into the house to close the windows.

"As I closed one of the windows, I saw [Jawaher] lose consciousness because of the gas, and I ran to her with Aslam to take her away," Ilham said. "We lifted her together and carried her to the yard of my house. We called for help and she began to vomit. She had foam on her mouth."

The teens said they then called Abu Rahmah's brother Samir, but that he could not find an ambulance. He then called his elder brother, Ahmed, who was in the procession. There were reportedly two ambulances there and he took one of them to the spot where Jawaher was lying.

According to Ahmed and Samir Abu Rahmah, who on Monday described the scene to Haaretz, their sister Jawaher was still alive and conscious at that point. She waved her hands to indicate that she needed air and told them that she was going to die. They said she then vomited and that foam covered her mouth.

Subhiya, Jawaher's mother, relayed the same version of events to the village committee.

According to Saher Basrat, the ambulance driver who evacuated Jawaher Abu Rahmah from the scene, "I picked up Jawaher at the entrance to the path close to the [separation] fence, where the demonstration had taken place. She was partially conscious, responded to questions and said that she was being choked by the gas. I took her to the hospital immediately."

 

Palestijnse economie vaart wel bij werk voorIsraeli's


Ondanks de Palestijnse boycot van alles wat op enige wijze met de nederzettingen te maken heeft, is het aantal Palestijnen dat in de nederzettingen of Israel werkt toegenomen. Daarmee is ook de Palestijnse economie verder gegroeid:
 
Released on Monday, the survey said growth was concentrated in economic activities with largest share in construction with a growth rate of 36 percent, followed by agriculture and fishing, wholesale and retail trade, transport, storage and communications, services, and public administration.

De boycot, indien succesvol gehandhaafd, zal de Palestijnse economie waarschijnlijk meer schaden dan de Israelische. Toch kan ik mij goed voorstellen dat men niet aan de zo gehate nederzettingen wil meebouwen. Als de PA zo graag principieel wil zijn, zal het echter met goede alternatieven moeten komen en dus zelf voor werkgelegenheid zorgen. Tot nu toe lijkt men daar niet veel moeite voor te doen, sterker nog, PA functionarissen werken zelf ook graag samen met Israel als men daar geld mee kan verdienen. Overigens is ook Israel niet erg principieel: diverse bedrijven hebben een code getekend dat zij de Palestijnse boycot van de nederzettingen respecteren en hebben hun werk daar gestaakt, in ruil voor interessante contracten voor de bouw van de nieuwe Palestijnse stad Rawabi.
 
RP
------------
 

PA GDP proportional to percentage working for Israelis

 
 
From Ma'an:

Of every 100 Palestinian workers, 11 work in Israel and the settlements compared to 10 in 2009, a new survey from the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics found.

The increase helped push up the Palestinian GDP per capita, in what was counted as a year of growth across the region.

Palestine's Gross Domestic Product increased by about 9 percent during the first three quarters of 2010 compared with the same period of 2009.

Released on Monday, the survey said growth was concentrated in economic activities with largest share in construction with a growth rate of 36 percent, followed by agriculture and fishing, wholesale and retail trade, transport, storage and communications, services, and public administration.

GDP per capita for Palestinian areas increased by 5 percent during the third quarter of 2010 compared with the same quarter of 2009, spurred mostly by an increase of three percent in the number of workers in construction, industry and the service sector.
Which means that since the settlement freeze ended, with Arabs working to build houses in Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria, the Palestinian Arab GDP for the fourth quarter should go even higher.

So once again the people who say they want "peace" also want to hurt ordinary Palestinian Arabs trying to raise their families in dignity.

It is also interesting to see that the GDP increase is almost directly proportional - 9-10% - to the increase of workers in Israel and the Israeli towns across the green line. Foreign aid might not be so much a factor - jobs and cooperation with Israel is.

By the way, these statistics include Gaza, where no one works for Israelis, so that means that the percentage of West Bank Arabs who work for Israelis is probably closer to 15%. Boycotting Israel would throw the Palestinian Arab economy into a tailspin, and it would raise the West Bank unemployment rate to about the same as Gaza's is now - from around 17% to around 32%.

Canadese Pakistani over de wortels van islamitisch antisemitisme

 
Een Pakistaans-Canadese moslim heeft een moedig boek over islamitisch en Arabisch antisemitisme geschreven. Hij hekelt in het bijzonder zijn geboortestad in Pakistan:
 
Fatah, born and raised in Karachi, laments that antisemitism has found widespread acceptance in Pakistan. He singles out the city of Peshawar as a hotbed of Jew-hatred. "If there is a place on earth today where identifying oneself as a Jew means inviting serious danger to life and liberty, then the historic Pakistani city of Peshawar would easily win that hon­our."
 
Ik vrees dat dit geldt voor veel steden in Pakistan, Saudi-Arabië, Libië, Syrië, Libanon en andere landen. Zelfs in een als gematigd en Westers geörienteerd bekend staand land als Jordanië is een overgrote meerderheid van de bevolking antisemitisch, zo blijkt onder andere uit PEW onderzoeken.
 
Fatah's first friendship with a Jew did not occur until 1993, when he met his boss-to-be, Toronto trade unionist Julius Deutsch, who died last year. The son of German Jewish ref­ugees, he imparted to Fatah an understand­ing of the complexity of the Arab-Israeli conflict. " I learned from this Jew that things are rarely ever black and white, and that the truth is usually found in the grey areas of overlapping narratives."
 
Een bevestiging van de theorie, door fanatici aan beide kanten fel bekritiseerd, dat elkaar leren kennen een noodzakelijk onderdeel is van verzoening en het oplossen van het conflict tussen Israel en de Arabieren.
 
Fatah believes that the Muslim community's "false sense of victimhood" is counter-productive. "As the rest of the world makes rapid advances in technology, culture, arts, literature and social development, the Muslim world seems frozen in time, obsessed with the past… [and] paralyzed in the quagmire of stagnation."
 
Juist vanuit dat slachtofferschap is het succes van Israel zo ondragelijk. Japan zag na WOII Amerika (en het Westen) als voorbeeld, niet als vijand, en was daardoor in staat om te delen in de Westerse welvaart en ontwikkeling. Ook de Arabische wereld zou dat veel meer kunnen doen als men de wrok en onvrede over de huidige situatie zou omzetten in actie: 'Heeft Israel zoveel meer nobelprijswinnaars, technologische vindingen, economische groei? Wij laten zien dat we dat ook kunnen!'
 
RP
-------------
 
Canadian explores roots of Muslim antisemitism
By SHELDON KIRSHNER, Staff Reporter
Thursday, 06 January 2011
 
 
Tarek Fatah, a frank and fearless Pakistani Canadian Muslim writer and broadcaster, has written an astonishingly courageous and much-need­ed book.

In The Jew Is Not My Enemy: Unveiling the Myths that Fuel Muslim Anti-Semitism (McClelland & Stewart), he  explores the historical, political and theological underpinnings of this pernicious phenomenon and explains why Israel's right to exist cannot be questioned.

Claiming that a virulent form of antisemitism has inundated the Islamic world, Fatah traces its roots to the Ha­dith, the commentaries written on the Prophet Muhammad's words and deeds after his death. "From labelling Christians and Jews pigs and apes to prohibiting Muslims from playing chess, Hadith literature has been a source of much embarrassment to Muslims," he writes. Anti-Jewish passages in the Ha­dith, he adds, have been superimposed on the Qur'an, which, though generally respect­ful of Judaism, contains "some pretty harsh language about Jews."

A legend in which Muhammad supposedly participated in the slaughter of 600 to 900 Jews in Medina in 627 also nourishes antisemitism among Mus­lims, he con­tends. "Contemporary Islamists and clerics evoke the story of the slaughter to recruit young Muslim into the hate fest targeted at the Jew," he writes. He adds, "The story of the massacre… feeds our hatred and gives us moral and religious validation for that hate."

He suggests that Islamic fundamentalists such as the Egyptian Sayyid Qutb have exacerbated tensions. In an essay titled "Our Fight Against the Jews," Qutb wrote, "The Jews will be sa­tisfied only with the destruction of [Islam]."

Fatah also has harsh things to say about Mohammed Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem. After collaborating with Nazi Germany, he persuaded Islamists in postwar Egypt that antisemitism should be an integral component of their worldview.

To Fatah, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the Russian forgery first published in Arabic in 1926 in Jerusalem, firmly established antisemitism in the Muslim consciousness. "However, it was only after the end of World War II, when the rest of the world had dismissed The Protocols as a fake, that the tract found new life in the Middle East," Fa­tah writes. "Defeat of the combined Arab armies in 1948 at the hands of Israel gave fresh impetus to Judeophobia."

Infected by the virus of antisemitism, a growing number of Islamists and Muslim intellectuals prone to conspiracy theories believe that Jews cannot be trusted and control the world, he says.

And, citing a study by the Hudson Institute's Center for Religious Freedom, he accuses Saudi Arabia of funding the publication of antisemitic "Islamic propaganda."

Fatah, born and raised in Karachi, laments that antisemitism has found widespread acceptance in Pakistan. He singles out the city of Peshawar as a hotbed of Jew-hatred. "If there is a place on earth today where identifying oneself as a Jew means inviting serious danger to life and liberty, then the historic Pakistani city of Peshawar would easily win that hon­our."

Transformed into a centre of jihadism by Al Qaeda and "Arab Af­ghans," Pesh­awar was once home to a pros­perous and thriving Jewish community with a synagogue. But now Peshawar is "a place where men are willing to slit the throat of a kuffar [non-believer] and confess to the crime with pride."

Although warning that a discussion of Muslim-Jewish relations becomes a non-starter the moment Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state is challenged, Fa­tah insists that Israel's "illegal and im­moral" occupation of the West Bank has contributed to the rise of blatant antisemitism in Muslim countries.

As he puts it, "Though it is true that many Muslim critics of Israel are motivated by Judeophobia, not all criticism – even the harshest – stems from antisemitism."

Fatah, a supporter of a two-state solution, holds that the Arabs' uncompromising "all-or-nothing" policy was a factor in bringing about the birth of Israel. The Palestinians could have ac­hieved statehood long ago had they accepted the 1937 Peel Commission plan or the 1947 United Nations partition plan, he argues.

Fatah urges Muslims to reconcile themselves to the fact that Israel's establishment was sanctioned by the Uni­ted Nations' General Assembly by a two­-thirds majority. "Questioning Israel's moral and legal right to exist as a state within secure borders that are re­cognized by its neigh­bours should cease to be a subject of endless debate," he writes. "I believe it is fundamentally anti-Jewish to incessantly challenge the moral and ethical basis of Israel as a Jew­ish state."

Fatah's beliefs, and his willingness to state them in public, belies the fact that he was "conflicted" for decades. As a student in Pakistan, he raised funds for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Pa­lestine, and in Toronto, he demonstra­ted outside the Israeli consulate. "But never once in my entire life have I had even an iota of antisemitism in my soul," he observes.

Fatah's first friendship with a Jew did not occur until 1993, when he met his boss-to-be, Toronto trade unionist Julius Deutsch, who died last year. The son of German Jewish ref­ugees, he imparted to Fatah an understand­ing of the complexity of the Arab-Israeli conflict. " I learned from this Jew that things are rarely ever black and white, and that the truth is usually found in the grey areas of overlapping narratives."

Fatah believes that the Muslim community's "false sense of victimhood" is counter-productive. "As the rest of the world makes rapid advances in technology, culture, arts, literature and social development, the Muslim world seems frozen in time, obsessed with the past… [and] paralyzed in the quagmire of stagnation."

Though much of his book is laden with gloom, Fatah claims not all is lost. Muslim reformers are gaining ground, and their voices are being heard, he says, citing a list of names.

Whether Fatah is overly optimistic re­mains to be seen. But if the Middle East is ever to become a better place for Jews and Arabs, let us hope that Fatah is right.

 

WikiLeaks: Israel wilde economie Gaza beknotten zonder humanitaire crisis

 

Dit is hoe dit feit in de mainstream media is weergegeven: de suggestie is dat de Gazanen net in leven werden gehouden. Het bevat verder de nodige onjuistheden, zoals dat het Turkse schip de Mavi Marmara hulpgoederen aan boord had, wat niet zo was, en dat Israel pas na de internationale woede over de entering van dit schip vol extremisten dagelijks tientallen vrachtwagens met goederen toe liet. Dat deed het echter daarvoor ook al (vele tientallen en soms meer dan honderd), en na de versoepeling van de blokkade waren dat er honderden. Op het laatst wordt nog eens herhaald dat de Palestijnen vinden dat Gaza nog steeds een gevangenis is, en dat de armoede daar alleen aan Israel ligt.
 
Israel wilde het Hamas regime zoveel mogelijk verzwakken zonder dat de inwoners daardoor honger leiden. Ook dat is vele malen door Israelische leiders gezegd. Ik heb zelf mijn vraagtekens bij de blokkade, maar het wordt allemaal weer eens erg sterk aangezet. Een andere interpretatie van dit Wikileaks document kun je hier lezen. Feit is dat Hamas in één klap een einde aan de blokkade had kunnen maken door Gilad Shalit vrij te laten. Bovendien had Hamas Israel de oorlog verklaard. In oorlogstijd is een blokkade van vijandelijk gebied legitiem.
 
Tot slot was er wel genoeg geld en materiaal voor allerlei luxe resorts, hotels en shopping malls. Daar hebben de meeste Gazanen geen geld voor, maar dat is dus een kwestie van verdeling.
 
RP
----------
 

Israel said would keep Gaza near collapse - Wikileaks

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20110105/tts-uk-palestinians-israel-wikileaks-ca02f96.html

Israel told U.S. officials in 2008 it would keep Gaza's economy "on the brink of collapse" while avoiding a humanitarian crisis, according to U.S. diplomatic cables published by a Norwegian daily on Wednesday.

Three cables cited by the Aftenposten newspaper, which has said it has all 250,000 U.S. cables leaked to WikiLeaks, showed that Israel kept the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv briefed on its internationally criticised blockade of the Gaza Strip.

The territory, home to 1.3 million Palestinians, is run by the Islamist Hamas group, which is shunned by the West over its refusal to recognise Israel, renounce violence or accept existing interim Israeli-Palestinian peace deals.

"As part of their overall embargo plan against Gaza, Israeli officials have confirmed to (U.S. embassy economic officers) on multiple occasions that they intend to keep the Gazan economy on the brink of collapse without quite pushing it over the edge," one of the cables read.

Israel wanted the coastal territory's economy "functioning at the lowest level possible consistent with avoiding a humanitarian crisis," according to the November 3, 2008 cable.

In a speech in January 2008, then-Prime Minister Ehud Olmert appeared to spell out that policy, which has since been eased in the wake of an international outcry over a deadly Israeli raid last May on a Turkish aid ship trying to break the blockade.

"We will not harm the supply of food for children, medicine for those who need it and fuel for institutions that save lives," Olmert said at the time.

"But there is no justification for demanding we allow residents of Gaza to live normal lives while shells and rockets are fired from their streets and courtyards (at southern Israel)," he added.

The Jewish state says it has significantly relaxed the blockade since May, with dozens of truckloads of goods entering the territory daily. Aid organisations have said shipments should be increased further.

Palestinians say impoverished Gaza remains effectively a "prison" sealed off by Israel, and have called for an opening to allow normal trade and other links with the world.

(Writing by Jeffrey Heller, editing by Mark Heinrich)

 

WikiLeaks laat logica zien van Israelische blokkade Gazastrook

 
Het Wikileaks document over hoe Israel de ecenomie van de Gazastrook bewust zwak wilde houden, is natuurlijk weer gefundens fressen voor de antizionisten. Zie je wel! We zeiden het altijd al! Israel wilde de Gazanen net niet uithongeren en hun leven zo ellendig mogelijk maken alleen maar omdat ze van hun democratische recht gebruik hadden gemaakt om een genocidale organisatie aan de macht te helpen die Israel de oorlog verklaarde.
 
Ik ben niet zo positief over de blokkade als Barry Rubin, en ik denk dat het inderdaad ook een tegengesteld effect had (naast het daadwerkelijk verzwakken van Hamas, dat flink in populariteit is achteruit gegaan). Welk effect het sterkst was geweest als het Westen het niet steeds voor Gaza (en dus Hamas) had opgenomen, en of het was gelukt om Hamas op die manier af te (laten) zetten, zullen we waarschijnlijk nooit weten. Het is bovendien altijd een duivels dilemma in hoeverre de burgerbevolking mag lijden onder sancties tegen een misdadig regime, en of Israel daarin te ver ging is ook niet eenduidig te zeggen. Blokkades tegen vijandige landen zijn legitiem, en Hamas verklaarde Israel de oorlog. Maar Gaza is geen land, en daardoor meer afhankelijk van buitenlandse hulp. De internationale gemeenschap had echter, in plaats van alleen Israel te bekritiseren, meer kunnen doen om Hamas tegen te werken en de wapensmokkel tegen te gaan. En de VS had natuurlijk nooit mogen toestaan dat Hamas, een racistische en terroristische organisatie, aan de verkiezingen deelnam, iets wat tegen de Oslo Akkoorden indruiste.
 
RP
---------
 

Wikileaks on Gaza Shows Israeli Policy and Why It Made Sense

http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/2011/01/wikileaks-on-gaza-shows-israeli-policy.html
 
By Barry Rubin

A new Wikileaks document is being spun by some media to imply something critical about Israel's policy in the Gaza Strip. In fact, the secret cable shows the exact opposite. It also shows that what I've been writing on the subject was 100 percent accurate.

The U.S. State Department cable dated November 3, 2008, says that the goal of Israel's sanctions on the Gaza Strip was to keep Gaza's economy functioning at the lowest possible level without causing a humanitarian crisis.

Precisely:

1. Israel wanted to keep the economy weak in order to reduce public support for the Hamas regime to the minimum possible level.

2. Israel wanted to keep the economy weak in order to keep Hamas as weak as possible so that it could not easily stage war on Israel or expand its influence into the West Bank or Egypt.

3. Israel did not want the people of Gaza to face hunger or serious deprivation based on existing living standards.

That all makes sense. It is in line with centuries of precedent and the policies of all democratic nations facing adversaries in a wartime situation.

Moreover since Hamas is a repressive, terrorist, genocidal-intended group that is a client of Iran and seeks to subvert almost all Arab governments, that policy does a service for the people of Gaza, Arab governments (notably the Palestinian Authority and Egypt), and Western interests.

BUT now that the sanctions have been minimized due to Western pressure and the urgings of well-intentioned but badly informed people:

--Hamas will be in power forever in Gaza.

--It will repress women, chase out Christians, and teach young people to grow up to be terrorists and suicide bombers.

--It will siphon off money for revolutionary subversive activities.

--It will block any possible negotiations for Israel-Palestinian peace.

--It is better able to subvert and perhaps some day take over the West Bank.

--It is better able to help revolutionary Islamists and terrorists in Egypt.

--The Hamas regime gives Iran a client state on the Mediterranean.

This is a step forward? A humanitarian victory? Don't think so.

So far, every single Wikileaks document--released by people who hate Israel (at least one of the Wikileaks staffer being a known extremist antisemitic nut)--has made Israel look good and has proven that its analysis of regional politics has been correct.

 
======
Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. His latest books are The Israel-Arab Reader (seventh edition), The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East (Wiley), and The Truth About Syria (Palgrave-Macmillan). The website of the GLORIA Center is at http://www.gloria-center.org and of his blog, Rubin Reports, http://www.rubinreports.blogspot.com .
 
 

woensdag 5 januari 2011

Afro-Amerikanen in VS kennen hogere werkloosheid dan Palestijnen op Westelijke Jordaanoever

 
Het gaat relatief gezien niet eens zo slecht met de Palestijnen op de Westoever qua inkomen, werkgelegenheid of levensverwachting, als je ze niet met de Israeli's vergelijkt maar met de omliggende Arabische landen, of zelfs met de zwarten in de VS. De gemiddelde Israeli heeft een levensstandaard die wellicht met Griekenland of Spanje te vergelijken is.
 
Wouter
____________
 

US blacks have higher unemployment rates than WB PalArabs

http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2010/12/us-blacks-have-higher-unemployment.html
 
 
From the Washington Post:
Unemployment for African Americans is projected to reach a 25-year high this year, according to a study released Thursday by an economic think tank, with the national rate soaring to 17.2 percent and the rates in five states exceeding 20 percent.

Better not tell human rights organizations, or else they will start writing a whole lot of reports about how the US is oppressing blacks to cause this high unemployment rate.

After all, they kill countless trees crying over Palestinian Arab unemployment, blaming Israel for it, when the rate for West Bank Palestinian Arabs is actually lower than blacks in the  US.

According to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, in the second quarter of 2010 the unemployment rate for everyone aged 15 and above was 15.2%, and for both Gaza and the West Bank together it was 22.9%.

If you don't count the Palestinian Arabs aged 15-17 the unemployment rate would be lower (the rate for 15-19 year olds is 22.6% in the West Bank and 72% in Gaza.)

What would happen if Israel would stop employing West Bank Palestinian Arabs?

13.5% of all West Bank Palestinian Arabs are employed in Israel or "settlements," according to the survey, so that means that the WB unemployment rate would go from 15.2% to 26.6% if Israel would unilaterally disengage altogether from the territory.

Before the Palestinian Arabs started the terror war of 2001, the unemployment rate in the West Bank was under 10%.

So it is obviously not Israeli policies that are keeping Palestinian Arabs from working, but Palestinian Arab actions and policies.

(h/t Zach)
 

Protocollen van de Wijzen van Zweinstein (of: Harry Potter in Iran)

 
Er zijn ook, met name in de VS, redelijk wat fundamentele christenen die niets moeten hebben van films en boeken over tovenarij. Marxistische intellectuelen in Chili anderzijds gruwden in de jaren '70 van de Donald Duck, die tere kinderzieltjes rijp maakte voor het kapitalisme en imperialisme. En dan heb ik het nog niet over het racistische Kuifje in Congo of de fascistische Smurfenstaat...
 
Sommigen van die kritieken hebben wel degelijk een punt, maar in Iran is puur Fantasialand; eerder hebben Iraanse 'geleerden' Tom en Jerry al als Joods complot ontmaskerd (verzonnen door de 'jood' Walt Disney als ik me goed herinner)!
 
Wouter
___________
 

Iran: Harry Potter is Zionist Plot for Devil Worship

 
 
If you thought the Harry Potter series was an innocent children's fantasy story, you're wrong, an Iranian movie producer says: In reality, the Harry Potter books and movies are part of a "Zionist plot" to "spread their poison." With its emphasis on witches, warlocks, and wonders, he says, the Harry Potter series "serves to spread the dark and evil essence of Zionism and its goals."

In a series of accusations that sound ridiculous to those raised in the West, Iran's Irinn TV channel produced a documentary that purports to show how the various elements of the Potter story - the use of magic, the struggle against the Dark Lord, and other themes - essentially reflect the tenets and goals of Zionism (read: Judaism), and encourage innocent people around the world to support those goals.

"Propaganda for purity of blood and race, one of the principles of global Zionism, is openly portrayed and emphasized in the second Harry Potter film," the film's narrator says, referring to the obsession of the film's villain, Voldemort, with pure bloodlines - symbolic of the Jews' parochial attitude to non-Jewish nations. "If we add this [film] to the other pieces of the puzzle - the beliefs depicted in the other propaganda and political products of the Ziono-Hollywoodists, the Satanic features of this inhumane movement will become more evident."

In addition to the blood theme, the series alludes to the Jewish desire to rule the world, says a prominent Iranian film critic quoted in the movie. "[The Zionists] support Harry Potter because he is the promised Messiah," Sa'id Mostaghasi says. "As you can see, he has the same traits and wants to defeat a dark force, which in this film is depicted as Voldemort. In the sixth episode, there is even mention of the War of Armageddon."

Perhaps worst of all, the documentary says, is the series' attempts to influence innocent Christians and Muslims to worship the devil, as the Jews do. "The creation of new stories, based on mythical themes leading to witchcraft and devil worship, has always been a tool used by contemporary Zionists, and is once again being used by them... targeting innocent children and youth" to join them in their Satanic ways."

The Iranians are apparently the first to make the three-way connection between Harry Potter, the Devil, and Jews, although they did not invent the two strands that make up that connection; Christian Europe has for nearly a millenium portrayed the Jews as the representative of the Devil on earth, while modern-day Christian evangelicals preachers have railed against Harry Potter because of its magic and fantasy related themes - although there have been a number of commentators across the spectrum of Christianity, including evangelicals and Catholics, who have rallied to the series' defense. Thus, while the Focus on the Family group has said that the Potter books contain some positive messages, "they are packaged in a medium - witchcraft - that is directly denounced in Scripture," evangelical author Connie Neal has written.

That the Iranians would connect the devil theme to the Jews is not surprising at all, given that Christians have been doing this for much of their own history. In his seminal work on the subject, "The Devil and the Jews," author Joshua Trachteberg laid out a sordid history of European anti-Semitism, which showed that much of Christian anti-Semitism over the past 1,000 years stems from a fear - and suspicion - that the Jews were working with the Devil to destroy Christianity.

"How is it that the Jews can be hated for being Communists and capitalists - at the same time," asks Trachtenberg, as he explores some of the most ridiculous beliefs that Christians have had about Jews: that they poison wells, desecrate the "host" (the wafer representing Jesus in Catholic ritual), and destroy morality, among many other sins. In his work, published in 1943, Trachtenberg builds a persuasive case that Christians have seen Jews as allies of the Devil, working against them, and that those vestigial beliefs are still around today - for example, in the accusation that Hollywood (which everyone knows is "controlled by the Jews") spreads moral perversion and unpatriotic attics.

Thus, it didn't take much for Iran to pick up on these themes in its battle against Israel and the Jews, says history researcher Morris Cohen. "Those themes were out there for the taking, so it makes sense that they would use them against Israel." The Islamic world, he said, is much more vehement in its condemnation of Harry Potter than the Christian world: In 2002, the books were banned in schools across the United Arab Emirates (UAE), on the grounds that its themes were contrary to Islamic values; in 2007, police in Karachi, Pakistan discovered and defused a car bomb located outside a shopping center where the final Harry Potter novel was scheduled to go on sale that day; and of course, Iran has harped on the Jewish connection to the sorcery themes in the books, saying that "Zionists had spent billions of dollars" on it in order to encourage devil worship, as described above.

The Jewish attitude to Harry Potter, it should be noted, has been a bit more varied. While some rabbis, especially in the hareidi-religious community, have spoken against the series, few have pointed to its emphasis on magic as the reason - and are more likely to lump it together with other popular culture phenomena that can draw the attention of children away from Torah study.

However, there are a fair number of rabbis and Jewish authors who have made deep analyses of the books and movies, and have found what they say are many parallels to Jewish philosophy and thought, with themes such as the power of good over evil, the importance of loyalty and friendship, and the value of doing right vs. the value of preserving light. In an article on Aish.com, for example, author Shira Albertson says that Harry "has to find the inner strength to act with independence and conviction," reflecting Hillel's famous saying, "If I am not for myself, who will be for me?"

While one would expect Judaism to be as vociferously opposed to Harry Potter as Christians and Muslims are - after all, magic and sorcery are capital crimes in the Torah - one reason that the Jewish towards Harry Potter is more relaxed may be because of the way Jews practice the Torah. "Jews are used to interpreting the Written Law through the lens of the Oral Law, and thus don't necessarily automatically jump on things that appear 'suspicious' on the surface," Rabbi Chaim Shapiro of New York told Israel National News. "For example, the death penalty is mentioned numerous times in the Torah for a wide array of sins, but the Talmud tells us that a Court of Jewish Law that killed too frequently - even once in 70 years - was condemned. The Oral Law obviates many of these penalties, so it makes sense that rabbis would look beyond the surface on the Harry Potter issue as well."

Israelische premier Netanjahoe biedt Abbas 'non-stop onderhandelingen' aan

 
NRC Handelsblad maakte hiervan: 'Leiders Israel en Palestina dagen elkaar uit te onderhandelen', maar Abbas bood helemaal niks; hij bleef vasthouden aan de eis dat Israel eerst stopt met bouwen op de Westoever en Oost Jeruzalem voordat er gepraat kan worden. Ook de term 'Palestina' is nogal vreemd, want er is nog helemaal geen staat die zo heet, en bovendien zijn Fatah en Hamas er nog niet helemaal uit wie die toekomstige staat zou moeten gaan besturen. Maar dat de NRC het niet zo nauw neemt met de feiten waar het Israel en de Palestijnen betreft, wisten we natuurlijk al.
 
RP
-----------
 
Sunday January 02 2011
Israeli PM offers 'non-stop talks'

Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said is ready to sit down with Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas for continuous one-on-one talks until they reach a peace deal.

Mr Netanyahu issued his statement on Sunday after a Palestinian man was killed in the West Bank after reportedly trying to attack Israeli troops at a checkpoint.

The offer of non-stop talks was an apparent bid to breathe life into the stalled Middle East peace-making.

Talks broke down in late September, just three weeks after they were launched at the White House, following the expiration of a limited Israeli freeze on settlement construction.

Mr Abbas says Israel must halt all settlement construction on occupied lands claimed by the Palestinians before talks can resume.

Mr Netanyahu has refused, but says he is ready to discuss all "core" issues with Abbas. Those include setting the final borders between Israel and a future Palestine, determining the fate of millions of Palestinian refugees and resolving the competing claims to the holy city of Jerusalem.

This weekend Mr Abbas said he believed a peace deal could be reached within two months if Mr Netanyahu showed "goodwill". He suggested that Mr Netanyahu adopt the positions of his more dovish predecessor, Ehud Olmert. "We were close to an agreement," said Mr Abbas. "The Palestinian position is clear to the Israelis and the Israeli position presented by Olmert is clear to us."

Mr Olmert has said he offered the Palestinians virtually all of the West Bank and parts of east Jerusalem - captured areas claimed by the Palestinians for their state - before negotiations broke down in late 2008.

Mr Netanyahu, who leads a more hardline coalition government, has given little indication that he is prepared to make similar concessions. But in response to Mr Abbas' comments, Mr Netanyahu said he "is ready to immediately sit down with Abu Mazen for continuous direct, one on one, negotiations until white smoke wafts" - an allusion to the Roman Catholic Church's method of signalling the choice of a new pope.

"If Abu Mazen agrees to my proposal that of directly discussing all the core issues, we will know very quickly if we can reach an agreement," he said.

Press Association

Palestijnse manipulaties met vermeende slachtoffers van Israelisch geweld

 
Er komen regelmatig Palestijnen om door Israelisch geweld, vaak terroristen of andere geweldplegers, maar te vaak ook onschuldigen die op het verkeerde moment op de verkeerde plek waren of zich verdacht gedroegen en als bedreiging werden gezien.
 
Er zijn echter ook veel gevallen bekend waarin de Palestijnse propaganda aantallen slachtoffers sterk overdreef, terroristen als onschuldige burgers neerzette, mensen die op andere wijze omkwamen als slachtofers van Israelisch geweld presenteerde, of waarbij later vermeende slachtoffers springlevend bleken te zijn.
Het nieuwste omstreden geval is Jawaher Abu Rahma uit Bi'ilin.
 
Wouter
_____________
 

The Death Of Abu Rahma Is Not The First Case Of Palestinian Media Manipulation

http://daledamos.blogspot.com/2011/01/death-of-abu-rahma-is-not-first-case-of.html
 
 
CAMERA gives a detailed analysis of the numerous questions surrounding the death of Jawaher Abu Rahma, including a short history of the Palestinian manipulation of the media:
A History of Manipulated Circumstances:

The murky circumstances of Abu Rahma's death cannot be viewed in a vacuum. It follows many instances in which Palestinian sources have fabricated and manipulated deaths, both on the large scale (such as in the case of the so-called "Jenin massacre" and on an individual level).
o Most famously, there is the case of Mohammed Al-Dura in September 2000. The many inconsistencies in the France 2 report blaming Israeli soldiers for his death have been documented extensively.

o Following the winter 2008-09 Gaza war, Khaled Abed Rabbo of Abed Rabbo in the northern Gaza Strip gave numerous completely contradictory accounts concerning the deaths of his daughters,

o  In April 2010, there was the case of Muhammed Faramawi, 15, who was said to have been shot "by Israeli forces" and "left bleeding for hours" before Israel allowed paramedics to evacuate him, has emerged, alive and well after having been held by Egyptian authorities.

o  In May 2008, Muhammad al-Harrani, a father of six from Gaza diagnosed with cancer who reportedly died while waiting for a permit to enter Israel, miraculously "came back to life."

o  In July 2003, Palestinian sources blamed the death of four Gaza men on Israel, when it later came to light that they died in a so-called "work accident," i.e., while preparing explosives.

o  An April 2002 staged funeral in Jenin, in which pallbearers drop a stretcher with a corpse, who falls off, and climbs right back on the stretcher [see below].

In all cases, the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) calls on journalists to "diligently seek out subjects of news stories to give them the opportunity to respond to allegations of wrongdoing." In the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, where Palestinian deaths have so often been manipulated and even staged for political purposes, journalists have an added burden to fully report Israel's account.
Read the whole thing

Traangas mogelijk niet doodsoorzaak Palestijnse vrouw uit Bil'in

 
De dood van de Palestijnse vrouw Jawaher Abu Rahma uit Bi'ilin rond de jaarwisseling haalde ook de Nederlandse media. Ze zou zijn gestikt door Israelisch traangas tijdens de wekelijkse protesten daar tegen de afscheidingsbarriere die Palestijnen uit het dorp van hun landbouwgrond scheidt.
 
De Palestijnse Autoriteit sprak gelijk van een 'oorlogsmisdaad', maar er is nogal wat onduidelijk aan de omstandigheden en de oorzaak van haar dood.
Zo zou ze volgens verschillende mediaberichten niet bij de demonstratie aanwezig zijn geweest, maar thuis (500 meter verderop) zijn gestikt door overwaaiend traangas, al dan niet met fosfor vermengd. Ze zou echter pas de volgende ochtend in het ziekenhuis in Ramallah zijn overleden. Rapporten en tijdstippen en zelfs familieleden spreken elkaar tegen, en er is geen autopsie verricht om de ware doodsoorzaak vast te stellen. Volgens medische documenten zou ze aan leukemie hebben geleden, maar de familie ontkent dat weer (of wist het niet?).
 
Elder of Ziyon bericht dat het vrijwel uitgesloten is dat iemand zou doodgaan van het traangas dat het Israelische leger (en de meeste andere) gebruikt bij protesten:
 
Wouter
____________

IDF: 'Dead Bil'in woman may not have been at protest'




Activist insists Jawaher Abu Rahma was at demonstration; Palestinian doctor says she died after inhaling tear gas.

A Palestinian woman, reported to have been killed by inhaling tear gas fired by IDF troops during an anti-security barrier protest on Friday, was apparently not at the protest, IDF sources said on Monday.

The IDF sources based their new assessment on medical documents that they obtained on Monday from the Palestinian Authority, which had initially refused to hand over the papers documenting 35-year-old Jawaher Abu Rahma's death.

"The whole story is full of inconsistencies," one senior officer said.

One example of an inconsistency was in the medical documents themselves. A lab report of blood work done for Abu Rahma showed that the blood was taken at 2:45 p.m. Friday afternoon. Another page from the report, which showed her time of admission to the hospital, put it at 3:20 p.m.

In addition, the medicine that she received, according to the reports, was medicine used to treat people suffering from blood cancer, poison or a drug overdose.

The IDF also questioned the way her death was reported. On Friday afternoon, the IDF received, like most weeks after the protest, a report that two demonstrators had been lightly wounded and were evacuated to a Ramallah hospital. By the evening, the PA updated the IDF that the two had been released to their homes.

The next morning, the IDF suddenly received a report that Abu Rahma had been killed.

The Palestinians rejected the IDF claims. Abu Rahma, according to activists and a Palestinian doctor, did in fact participate in the demonstration, during which she was overcome by IDF tear gas and taken to a Ramallah hospital. She died Saturday morning and was buried later that day.

Israeli activist Jonathan Pollak said he saw Abu Rahma at the demonstration and then later he saw her as she was taken into the ambulance. He added that someone had sent a Twitter message around the time that she as evacuated to the hospital, which stated: "One eye injury and Jawaher – sister of Bassem who was killed last year at a demo – was taken to the hospital for gas inhalation."

Another discrepancy in the Palestinian version was that the medical documents claimed Abu Rahma did not have a medical history. The IDF, however, has learned that she was hospitalized in Ramallah 10 days before the protest.

Pollak said he believed she was treated in the hospital for an ear infection. He added that she had been sick with the flu the week before, but said that to the best of his knowledge, she did not suffer from cancer.

Mohammed Aideh, the medical director of the Palestine Medical Complex in Ramallah where Abu Rahma was treated, said that Abu Rahma had died from "respiratory failure after gas inhalation."

He repeated that statement again when contacted on Tuesday night, adding that the respiratory failure had led to a cardiac arrest.

Abu Rahma, he said, was brought into the hospital in a semi-conscious state and she became unconscious. She was put on a mechanical respirator and her condition deteriorated, Aideh said.

The medical history taken from the family indicated that she was a healthy woman, and that nothing he observed upon her arrival contradicted that testimony.
 

zondag 2 januari 2011

Hamas gijzelt vluchtelingen uit Eritrea voor losgeld in Egypte

 
Een onvoorstelbaar verhaal, dat merkwaardig genoeg het nieuws hier niet haalt...
De mensenrechtengroep is in Italië bekend om haar inzet voor vluchtelingen en Roma.
 
Wouter
______________
 
Report: Hamas torturing 250 Eritreans in Egypt

http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-4005541,00.html

NGO reports Eritreans traveling to Israel to seek asylum are being held captive by terrorist group in northern Sinai. 'Extortion, organ trafficking fund Hamas and al-Qaeda," EveryOne co-President Roberto Malini says

Menachem Gantz

Published: 12.28.10, 20:00

Approximately 250 Eritrean refugees have been held captive and tortured for the past month by Hamas in northern Sinai, human rights organization EveryOne reported.

The Italian-based organization sent an urgent plea to the Egyptian government last Thursday, claiming that the refugees, who were making their way to Israel to seek asylum, were captured by human traffickers.

The issue of illegal refugees infiltrating through the Egyptian border has been dominating the news in Israel in recent months, but it appears that many meet a dreadful fate even before reaching the Jewish state.

The humanitarian aid group reported that the refugees in question encountered Hamas operatives along the route, who promised to smuggle them into Israel for a payment of $2,000. Instead, they were placed in a detention facility on the outskirts of Rafah, an Egyptian town on the Gaza border, demanding their families in Eritrea pay a $10,000 ransom for their release.

'Refugees target of organ trafficking'

It was further noted in the statement that eight of the immigrants were killed, and four have gone missing – allegedly being the subject of human organ harvesting and trafficking. About 100 of them were transferred to a 'concentration camp' at an unknown location, perhaps in the Palestinian territories. The captives are beaten, the women and children raped.

"The prisoners eat poor food and are forced to drink their own urine," the statement reads. "Most of the migrants are contemplating suicide."

According to Roberto Malini, who heads EveryOne, the NGO is able to communicate with the Eritreans, some of whom arrived in Italy a few months ago but were sent back to Libya, where they were held for three months. During their stay in Italy they were given cell phones so that they can keep the humanitarian aid group updated along the journey. The captors let the prisoners use the phones to request money from their families.

The refugees were thus able to relate the poor conditions in which they were being held, and describe their location – a house located near a government building, surrounded by a fruit orchard – and even send photographs of the detention facility.

'Egypt took no action'

According to refugees who survived similar journeys and reached Israel, once the ransom is paid, the traffickers escort the prisoners to certain points along the border. Those who are unable to gather the funds will meet a bitter end.

EveryOne officials claim that despite their repeated efforts to inform the Egyptian authorities of the dire situation, no action has been taken to remedy it, primarily because terrorist groups are behind the atrocities.

"The authorities have still not carried out any inspections of the locations that have been pointed out to them (in the town of Rafah)," the statement reads. "The reason is quite clear… behind the crimes that serve to fund terrorism and to make huge profits for unscrupulous people is a criminal organization so powerful that it is able to challenge and defy governments: the Muslim Brotherhood (the organization Hamas belongs to) and al-Qaeda.

 

Hoe Arabische media Israelische leiders als monsters en nazi's afbeelden

(Onze excuses voor deze wansmakelijke cartoon...)
 
 
In de Arabische media worden Israelische leiders veelvuldig met de nazi's vergeleken en als bloeddorstige monsters geportretteerd. De Anti-Defamation League (ADL) heeft deze demonisering voor de afgelopen tien jaar in kaart gebracht. Zij vervult verschillende functies, niet in de laatste plaats wordt de woede en frustratie van veel mensen over het wanbeleid, de zelfverrijking en het gebrek aan vrijheid en mogelijkheden in Arabische landen zo gekanaliseerd.
 
The fact is that the media in these countries is far from free.  Newspapers are often owned and controlled by the government and, even in cases where newspapers claim to be independent, the content often must be approved by the governments. We are not asking that these leaders censor their newspapers (which many of them already do); we are asking that they take a public stand against anti-Semitism and condemn these manifestations of hatred.
These caricatures are a visually powerful medium and there is no doubt that they have a profound impact on public opinion across the Arab and Muslim world, and shape attitudes towards Israel and Jews.
 
While at this time of tension peace seems very far away, any lasting Israeli-Arab peace will require not just agreements on paper, but understanding, tolerance and peace between people.  Putting a stop to incitement in Arab societies, beginning with the Palestinian Authority, will be a vital component to ensure a lasting peace between Israel and its neighbors.

RP
------------
 
The Arab Press' Nazification of Israeli Leaders
29 Dec. 2010

Anti-Defamation League (ADL) National Director Abraham Foxman on fighting anti-Semitism, bigotry and extremism.

 
The images are stark and ugly: Demonic figures with blood dripping from their hands; Nazis in uniform, carrying out brutal atrocities against defenseless civilians; smug, arrogant figures who orchestrate their influence and dominance over the United States and the international community.
 
These are not images from some low-budget, B movie horror picture or ripped from the pages of the notorious Nazi propaganda organ, Der Stürmer. They are caricatures of Israeli prime ministers as they have been routinely portrayed over the past decade in editorial cartoons in newspapers across the Middle East, from Dubai to Cairo and beyond.

Sadly, we have come to expect mainstream newspapers in the Muslim and Arab world to dabble in pernicious anti-Semitic stereotypes. It is a trend that has been going on almost since the creation of the Jewish state.

There is a consistent drumbeat of anti-Semitism in editorial cartoons and images appearing in the mainstream large-circulation daily newspapers in many nations, including Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria and the United Arab Emirates.

In periodic reports over the last few decades, the Anti-Defamation League has exposed the anti-Israel and anti-Semitic editorial cartoons appearing almost daily in dozens of newspapers and Web sites from across the Arab and Muslim world, while monitoring the newspapers for trends in their criticism of Israel or their portrayals of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. 

Among the many trends we have seen in recent years has been a consistent effort to demonize and attack Israel's prime ministers and others in positions of leadership.

These images of Israeli leaders are the subject of a new ADL report, issued this month.  Personalizing the Conflict:  A Decade of an Assault on Israel's Premiers in the Arab Media shows how four successive Israeli prime ministers – Ehud Barak, Ariel Sharon, Ehud Olmert and Benjamin Netanyahu – have been repeatedly vilified and demonized along with the Jewish state and its people using hateful and extreme anti-Israel themes and frequently anti-Semitic stereotypes.

We have found that no matter which government is in power, whether it is a time of relative quiet or conflict, or whatever current policy is being pursued, newspapers across the Arab and Muslim world have consistently portrayed Israel and its leaders with vicious, hateful images.

When the depictions are not blatantly anti-Semitic, inappropriate and offensive Nazi comparisons abound.

In the Arab world, the use of such Nazi imagery serves a dual purpose:  It trivializes the actual events of the Holocaust while labeling Israel's actions against the Palestinians as "Nazi-like."  This in effect hypocritically turns the victims – Jews who fled persecution and the death camps in Europe for British-mandate Palestine in the years during and after World War II – into criminals who are as bad or worse than their oppressors during the Shoah.

Of course, Palestinian or Arab leaders rarely come in for such treatment. They are often shown as weak or powerless, but never in terms so grossly outrageous as those used for Israel's leaders.  And Palestinians are certainly never rebuked for their use of terrorism against innocent civilians.

It does not come as a surprise that Ariel Sharon was the most despised prime minister of all, blamed for the Sabra and Shatila massacre in 1982 and consistently portrayed as a bloodthirsty killer with bloodied hands, eating Palestinian children, drinking their blood and butchering them.  In the cartoons, Sharon was frequently compared to the Nazis and Adolf Hitler. 

Ehud Barak was depicted in Arab cartoons as a Nazi or war criminal, compared to both Hitler and to former Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic.  He, too, was often depicted as a blood-thirsty killer, surrounded by skulls or dead Palestinians.  

Ehud Olmert was often shown as a Nazi with swastikas emblazoned on his uniform, or as a blood-thirsty killer of Lebanese and Palestinians in the 2006 Lebanon War and the 2008 Gaza Operation.  

Most recently, editorial cartoonists have vilified Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with these same themes - as the devil incarnate, as one who is controlling and manipulating, or holding the U.S. government hostage.  

To be sure, the job of editorial cartoonists is to depict public figures in an exaggerated manner.  But in using incendiary images, including age-old anti-Jewish stereotypes and conspiracy theories, these caricatures cross the line from comment or parody into demonization of Israel and of Jews. 

On numerous occasions, I have raised this issue in meetings with leaders from Egypt, Jordan, and the Persian Gulf.  I have shared with them examples of how newspapers in their own countries depict Israelis and Jews in a hateful and incendiary manner, and requested that they take action. 

Each has deflected, downplayed and excused this phenomenon.  All have questioned how I, as an American, can expect them to violate these cartoonists' "free speech" or "freedom of the press."

The fact is that the media in these countries is far from free.  Newspapers are often owned and controlled by the government and, even in cases where newspapers claim to be independent, the content often must be approved by the governments. We are not asking that these leaders censor their newspapers (which many of them already do); we are asking that they take a public stand against anti-Semitism and condemn these manifestations of hatred. 

These caricatures are a visually powerful medium and there is no doubt that they have a profound impact on public opinion across the Arab and Muslim world, and shape attitudes towards Israel and Jews.

The reality is that in these societies there is virtually no alternative to the images of Israeli or Jew as blood-thirsty, monstrous Nazis with aspirations of carrying out war crimes or controlling the region and the world.   

While at this time of tension peace seems very far away, any lasting Israeli-Arab peace will require not just agreements on paper, but understanding, tolerance and peace between people.  Putting a stop to incitement in Arab societies, beginning with the Palestinian Authority, will be a vital component to ensure a lasting peace between Israel and its neighbors.

Gekleurde berichtgeving over Israel wakkert antisemitisme aan

 
Ik ben het boek van Manfred Gerstenfeld aan het lezen, en zal daarvan een verslag op mijn blog zetten.
Wat betreft het rapport van het Meldpunt Discriminatie Internet, waar hieronder naar wordt verwezen: dat ging alleen over meldingen op internet, terwijl het rapport van het CIDI over alle antisemitische meldingen ging. Ik vraag mij overigens af hoe het MDI heeft gemeten welke uitingen van allochtonen danwel autochtonen kwamen.
 
At the same time an extensive investigation by two Dutch NGOs into the way two main news providers in the Netherlands reported the war in Gaza revealed that much of the Dutch public was effectively exposed to the Hamas narrative throughout the war. The reports published by WAAR and Israel Facts Monitor Group proved that the Israeli narrative was ignored completely and that many reports contained incorrect or distorted information.

The investigated media, the state funded NOS Journaal TV news show and the leading daily NRC, together with many other media outlets in the Netherlands, continue to mislead the Dutch public as to the Middle East and Israel to this day. Some of the media even openly resort to incitement and publish outright lies.

 
 
RP
----------
 
 
Anti-Semitism and Israel

http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-4006155,00.html

Op-ed: Biased Dutch reporting on Arab-Israeli conflict leads to drastic rise in anti-Semitism

Yochanan Visser

Published: 12.29.10, 12:47

Former EU commissioner Frits Bolkestein's advice to recognizable Jews in the Netherlands to leave for the US or Israel caused quite an uproar two weeks ago. Even Israeli media picked up the story about Bolkestein's remarks, which were highlighted in a new book titled "Dutch Jewry in the clueless Netherlands." Bolkestein later clarified that his remarks were meant as a wake up call in light of the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe.

The author of the book, Manfred Gerstenfeld (JCPA) is a Dutch Israeli expert on European anti-Semitism. He wrote the book because he believes that the treatment of Jews in the Netherlands provides insight to the society as a whole. He also says that the situation in the Netherlands mirrors the problems of the Jews in other parts of Europe.

However, a largely unnoticed remark by Bolkestein about the link between the rise in anti-Semitism and the Israeli-Arab conflict could offer more insight to the root cause of the current problem.

The year 2000 marked the beginning of the second intifada and ever since most Dutch media have conducted a relentless disinformation campaign about Israel. It is this campaign that has changed the whole climate in which the debate about Israel in the Netherlands is taking place. In the resulting environment, Dutch Jews are held responsible for events taking place in Israel and ultimately it is no longer taboo to make anti-Semitic comments.

Indifference and ignorance

The Dutch media succeeded in distorting the story about Bolkestein's remarks as well.

Several headlines in news reports suggested that Bolkestein wanted the Jews out of the Netherlands. When interviewed about this, Gerstenfeld responded that the Dutch media misquoted Bolkestein's remarks in order to make him look bad because of his support for Israel.

Dutch mainstream paper Trouw went to great lengths in order to prove Gerstenfeld and Bolkestein wrong when it published an article that presented recent data about anti-Semitism on the Internet. These data were meant to prove that native Dutchmen were responsible for most anti-Semitic incidents. Trouw also wrote that Gerstenfeld exaggerated the rise in anti-Semitism. The paper argued that the data - provided by MDI, a hotline for reporting racist incidents - showed only a slight increase in the incidents.

However, Trouw omitted the fact that MDI refuses to act on a great number of reported anti-Semitic incidents because it uses an outdated definition of anti-Semitism. Trouw also ignored a recent report by the Center for Information and Documentation about Israel (CIDI) that presented clear evidence of the rise in anti-Semitic incidents in Dutch society.

Contemporary attitudes towards anti-Semitism by the Dutch people and government show the same indifference and ignorance. A Dutch blogger, Asher Ben Avraham reported that during the last Chanukah celebration, the new mayor of Amsterdam van der Laan, called on the Dutch Jews not to stir up their own fear. That sounded pretty much as if the Jews were responsible for the disasters that have befallen them. It also suggested that the fear for racist attacks is the result of a psychological problem.

The Jewish leader of the Dutch socialist party PvdA Job Cohen came up with an even more disturbing idea about the problems with the Dutch Muslims. He compared their situation with the fate of the Dutch Jews during the beginning of the Nazi occupation.

The well known Dutch rabbi Evers told the paper Algemeen Dagblad that he has stopped using the Amsterdam light rail after he became the victim of repeated verbal attacks. He also reported that there are no-go zones for Jews in Amsterdam.

Evers is well known for his blunt observations about attitudes towards Jews in Dutch society. In a radio show in 2001, a Dutch caller attacked him over Israeli actions during Operation Defensive Shield. In response, Evers argued that even though the Dutch have the reputation of being a tolerant nation they are in fact not. He said that ever since Jews lived in The Netherlands they were officially treated as equals but in practice remained aliens. This largely explains the indifference towards the plight of the Jews in the Netherlands during World War II, he said. Some 75% of Dutch Jews were murdered by the Nazis.

Cognitive war

By now it is clear that Bolkestein's remarks were meant as severe criticism of the way the Dutch government is handling the rise in anti-Semitism. However, one important issue Bolkestein did not address was how exactly the link between anti-Semitism in the Netherlands and the Mideast conflict came into being.

The recent CIDI study, however, clearly shows the link between events in Israel and the drastic increase in anti-Semitic incidents in the Netherlands. CIDI recorded an explosion of anti-Semitic incidents during operation Cast Lead.

At the same time an extensive investigation by two Dutch NGOs into the way two main news providers in the Netherlands reported the war in Gaza revealed that much of the Dutch public was effectively exposed to the Hamas narrative throughout the war. The reports published by WAAR and Israel Facts Monitor Group proved that the Israeli narrative was ignored completely and that many reports contained incorrect or distorted information.
 
The investigated media, the state funded NOS Journaal TV news show and the leading daily NRC, together with many other media outlets in the Netherlands, continue to mislead the Dutch public as to the Middle East and Israel to this day. Some of the media even openly resort to incitement and publish outright lies.

The long term exposure to this sort of biased and distorted reporting seems to be the main reason why Muslim immigrants and native Dutchmen alike develop anti- Israel and in some cases anti-Semitic views. Dutch public opinion about Israel is after all largely based on the mainstream media reporting.

Meanwhile, new Dutch foreign minister Rosenthal seems to have understood this link as well. In an interview with Elsevier magazine he said the Dutch government will work to resist Israel bashing. But that's not enough; Bolkestein's remarks should serve as the starting point of a discussion and reflection about contemporary anti-Semitism elsewhere in Europe as well.

And last but not least, this should lead to an immediate end of foreign media collaboration with the forces who are conducting a cognitive war in order to achieve the demise of Israel. By now it is clear that this war has repercussions far beyond the borders of Israel.

--------

The writer is the project manager of Missing Peace, a public diplomacy organization active in The Netherlands and Belgium

 

Ups en downs in verhouding Israel - Europa in 2010

 
Een overzichtje van de ups en downs in de verhoudingen tussen Israel en Europa in 2010, waarbij ook de discussie over overheidssubsidie van Nederland aan Electronic Intifada (via ICCO) vermeld wordt.
 
Wouter
_____________
 

Analysis: Ups and downs in Europe-Israel 2010 ties




Tougher Iran stance, harsh criticism of flotilla raid mark relationship; Europe's tango with Israel will continue to be filled with rocky dance steps.

BERLIN – A snapshot of Europe- Israel relations in 2010 shows a mixture of highs, lows and explicit hostility toward the Jewish state.
First, the good news.

The Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) admitted Israel into its exclusive club of leading world economies. While three European countries – Switzerland, Norway and Ireland – in which anti-Israel sentiments can run high had been reluctant to green-light Israel's entry into the club, they decided in September to join the unanimous vote of its 31 members to admit Israel.
Membership will expand opportunities for foreign investors in Israel and help improve the country's credit rating.

The European Union's decision to implement a robust round of sanctions in October against Iran's illicit nuclear program represent something of a sea change in Europe's posture toward Iran. Israel had advocated hard-hitting sanctions targeting the Islamic Republic's energy sector.

There are growing indications that Europe has awakened from its slumber and realizes that Iran is a threat not only to Israel, but to European security. The UK and France took the lead in convincing the EU that Iran needed to be disciplined. The crowning achievement of the EU sanctions is the prohibition of the sale of gas and oil technology to Teheran.

Dr. Diana Gregor, a political analyst and researcher with Réalité EU, an organization that tracks European- Iranian trade, e-mailed The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday, saying that "France and Great Britain are the driving forces behind the effort to forcefully implement the Iran sanctions."

Gregor, who has written extensively about Austrian-Iranian relations, said the leadership of France and Britain within the EU boded well for Iran-sanctions enforcement because, for example, countries such as Austria and Italy would be "considerably worse."

Gaps in the EU sanctions still need to be plugged, say observers. A telling example is Italy's rising consumption of Iranian crude oil. Italy's import of Iranian oil mushroomed by 90.8 percent during the first nine months of 2010. And the Swiss state-owned energy giant EGL has refused to terminate its estimated 18 billion-22b. euro gas deal with the National Iranian Gas Export Company.

Banning the purchase of Iranian gas and crude oil would add a real bite to the EU sanctions.

According to a Post review of the new German-Iranian trade numbers, German Chancellor Angela Merkel's administration has refused to clamp down on its flourishing business relationship with Teheran.

German exports to Iran climbed to 3,164,462b. euros between January and October 2010, compared to 3,012,653b. euros during the same period in 2009.

In what might mean a blow against European NGOs which fund efforts to delegitimize Israel, the new Dutch foreign minister, Uri Rosenthal, said he plans to delve into his government's funding of the Interchurch Organization for Development Cooperation (ICCO), a Dutch aid organization that finances the Electronic Intifada. The pro-Palestinian website compares Israel with the former apartheid regime in South Africa and uses Nazi references to describe Israel's policies.

Rosenthal told the Post in November, "I will look into the matter personally. If it appears that the government- subsidized NGO ICCO does fund Electronic Intifada, it will have a serious problem with me."
The Dutch parliament has discussed tax-payer funding of Electronic Intifada, and a decision is expected in January.

Some of the lows on the report card of Europe-Israel relations in 2010 involved Europe's response to Israel's security measures and to the peace process.

The assassination of Hamas terrorist Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai, which was attributed to Israeli intelligence agencies, prompted the UK and Ireland to expel Israeli diplomats because of the alleged use of doctored British and Irish passports in January's targeted killing of Mabhouh.

While President Barack Obama dropped his demand that Israel suspend construction of apartment complexes in east Jerusalem and settlements in the disputed territories as a condition for new Israeli- Palestinian peace talks, the EU continues to make the freezing of Israeli construction the cornerstone of its foreign policy.

The outgoing year was marked by the rise of expressions of modern anti-Semitism and biased resolutions blasting Israel for its blockade of Gaza.

In a radio interview in September, former Belgian foreign minister and current European Trade Commissioner Karel de Gucht talked, in connection with Israel, about "the best organized lobby that exists there" [in the United States] and said, "There is, indeed, a religion, I can hardly describe it differently, among most Jews that they are right. So it is not easy to have a rational discussion with a moderate Jew about what is happening in the Middle East."

According to European anti-Semitism experts, the term "lobby" is a code word used by those in Europe who engage in anti-Semitic conspiratorial thinking.

European countries, and the EU's top diplomat Catherine Ashton, engaged in condemnations of Israel's seizure of the Turkish-sponsored Mavi Marmara, many of whose passengers had terrorist connections and murderous intentions toward the Israeli naval commandos who boarded the ship in May. German taxpayers funded MPs from the German Left Party, a hardcore anti-Zionist party, to travel on the Mavi Marmara.

In an interview with the Post in October, an Israeli diplomat who closely follows German-Israeli relations expressed enormous disappoint with the German parliament's decision to unanimously condemn Israel for intercepting the Mavi Marmara.

The diplomat noted that Merkel is considered to be the most pro-Israel chancellor ever, and yet she seemed to remain indifferent to the desire of the members of her Christian Democratic Union to vote for the anti-Israeli resolution.

The diplomat noted that such a crass expression of bias toward Israel did not occur during the watch of the previous Social Democratic- Green Party coalition government.

The Vienna city council was the second legislative body in Europe to unanimously blast Israel's reaction to the Gaza flotilla.

Both legislatures had failed to do their homework and exhaustively review the violent anti-Israeli motivations and actions of many of the Mavi Marmara's passengers.

Europe's tango with Israel will continue to be filled with rocky dance steps as the New Year enters.