woensdag 14 januari 2009

Hamas gebruikt kinderen ter ondersteuning Palestijnse strijders

 
Hamas zet regelmatig kinderen in voor de strijd, bijvoorbeeld om op de uitkijk te staan of andere taken voor de strijders te vervullen. Een voordeel is, dat kinderen minder opvallen en minder snel verdacht zijn. Ook zijn in het verleden kinderen gebruikt om explosieven door checkpoints te smokkelen. Uit het volgende citaat blijkt dat Hamas ook nu kinderen inzet voor de strijd, wat een directe schending is van het internationale recht:
 
"[The newspaper] Kul Al-Arab called many Gaza Strip residents, to comprehend the situation of the people who are suffering for two weeks from the wild Israeli aggression...

Khaled, from A-Rimal [in Gaza], said: 'We the children, in small groups and in civilian clothes, are fulfilling missions of support for the [Hamas] Resistance  fighters, by transmitting messages about the movements of the enemy forces, or by bringing them ammunition and food. We ourselves are not aware of the movements of the Resistance fighters. We see them in one place, they suddenly disappear, and then reappear somewhere else. They are like ghosts, it is very hard to find them or hurt them.'"

[Kul-Al-Arab (Israeli Arab weekly), January 9, 2009]
 
__________________________
 
Bron: Palestinian Media Watch - Hamas using children in combat support roles
PMW | King George 59 | Jerusalem | Israel
http://www.pmw.org.il

Iran waarschuwt Hamas om Egyptisch voorstel wapenstilstand niet te accepteren

 
De vergissing die we steeds maken, is dat we denken dat dit een conflict is tussen Israel en Hamas, een lokale Palestijnse gewapende groepering met wat in elkaar geknutselde raketten die meestal doel missen.
 
"The Iranians threatened to stop weapons supplies and funding to the Palestinian factions if they agreed to a cease-fire with Israel. The Iranians want to fight Israel and the US indirectly. They are doing this through Hamas in Palestine and Hizbullah in Lebanon."
 
De onderhandelingen worden blijkbaar indirect ook met Iran gevoerd.
 
RP
-----------

Iran warns Hamas not to accept Egyptian truce proposal
By KHALED ABU TOAMEH - The Jerusalem Post
 
Iran is exerting heavy pressure on Hamas not to accept the Egyptian proposal for a cease-fire with Israel, an Egyptian government official said on Sunday.

The official told The Jerusalem Post by phone that two senior Iranian officials who visited Damascus recently warned Hamas leaders against accepting the proposal.

His remarks came as Hamas representatives met in Cairo with Egyptian Intelligence Chief Gen. Omar Suleiman and his aides to discuss ways of ending the fighting in the Gaza Strip.

The Hamas representatives reiterated their opposition to a cease-fire that did not include the reopening of all the border crossings into the Gaza Strip, Hamas spokesmen said on Sunday.

The spokesmen said Hamas voiced its strong opposition to the idea of deploying an international force inside the Gaza Strip.

The Egyptian official said that the two Iranian emissaries, Ali Larijani, Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, and Said Jalili of the Iranian Intelligence Service, met in the Syrian capital with Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal and Islamic Jihad Secretary-General Ramadan Shallah.

"As soon as the Iranians heard about the Egyptian cease-fire initiative, they dispatched the two officials to Damascus on an urgent mission to warn the Palestinians against accepting it," the Egyptian government official told the Post.

"The Iranians threatened to stop weapons supplies and funding to the Palestinian factions if they agreed to a cease-fire with Israel. The Iranians want to fight Israel and the US indirectly. They are doing this through Hamas in Palestine and Hizbullah in Lebanon."

The official pointed out that the Iranians were applying "double standards" regarding the current conflict - on the one hand, they encouraged Iranian men to volunteer to fight alongside Hamas; on the other hand, Iran's spiritual leader, Ali Khamenei, told the volunteers that they would not be permitted to join the fight against Israel.

"The Iranians never fired one bullet at Israel," he said. "But now they are trying to appear as if they are participating in the war against Israel. The leaders of Teheran don't care about the innocent civilians who are being killed in the Gaza Strip."

The Egyptian official accused Iran of "encouraging" Hamas to continue firing rockets at Israel with the hope that this would trigger a war that would divert attention from Iran's nuclear plans.

"This conflict serves the interests of the Iranians," he said. "They are satisfied because the violence in the Gaza Strip has diverted attention from their nuclear ambitions. The Iranians are also hoping to use the Palestinian issue as a 'powerful card' in future talks with the Americans.

"They want to show that they have control over Hamas and many Palestinians."

Karam Jaber, editor of the semi-official Egyptian weekly Roz Al-Youssef magazine, said that Hamas was caught between the Syrian anvil and the Iranian hammer. The Iranians, he said, prevented Hamas from negotiating a cease-fire with Israel, while the Syrians were blackmailing and intimidating the Hamas leaders in Damascus.

"History won't forget to mention that Hamas had inflicted death and destruction on the Palestinians," he said. "We hope that Hamas has learned the lesson and realizes that it has been fighting a war on behalf of others. We hope the Hamas leaders will realize that they are fighting a destructive war on behalf of the Iranians and Syrians."
Egyptian political analyst Magdi Khalil said he shared the view of the Palestinian Authority and Egypt that Hamas was responsible for the war in the Gaza Strip. "Ever since Hamas seized control over the Gaza Strip in 2007, they turned the area into hell," he said. "They imposed restrictions on the people there and even prevented them from performing the pilgrimage to Mecca."

The analyst said that the head of the Egyptian General Intelligence Service was right when he recently described Hamas as a group of gangsters. "Hamas and its masters in Damascus and Teheran want to spread chaos in Egypt," he said. "They want to solve the problem of the Gaza Strip by handing the area over to Egypt. They want to create a homeland for the Palestinians in Sinai."

He said that Hamas was not only jeopardizing Egypt's national security, but had also destroyed the Palestinians' dream of statehood. "By endorsing the Iranian agenda, Hamas has brought the Iranians to Egypt's eastern border," he said. "Hamas has also copied Hizbullah's policy of entering into pointless adventures."

Dodental in Gaza zegt niets over proportionaliteit van IDF acties

 
Het eeuwige vergelijken van het aantal doden aan beide kanten is dus onzinnig als je wilt beoordelen of Israels reactie proportioneel is volgens het internationaal recht, maar dat snappen bijvoorbeeld Pauw en Witteman en NOVA niet.
 
RP
---------
 
Last update - 09:40 12/01/2009

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1054563.html
Legal expert: Rising Gaza death toll doesn't mean IDF acts are disproportionate
By Ofra Edelman


The fact that hundreds of Palestinians have been killed during the operation in Gaza, compared to fewer than 20 Israelis, has nothing to do with the question of whether the operation is legal according to international law, says Prof. Yuval Shany, an expert in international law from Hebrew University's law faculty.

The relevant question, he said, is "whether the operation is proportionate to the provocation that led to it. When a single Qassam [rocket] is fired, the state cannot invade and conquer an entire country. There must be a measure of proportion between the action and the reaction. But here, we are not talking about a single Qassam, but about years of Qassams."

Israel, he continued, "is permitted to use force to the degree necessary to end the attacks against it. Therefore, it [the operation] is legal as long as it is meant to prevent the attacks."

However, Shany stressed, by law, Israel would not have the right to use force to effect regime change in the Gaza Strip. Israel would also have no right to deliberately target Palestinian civilians, even though Hamas deliberately targets Israeli civilians: One side's illegal actions do not entitle the other side to violate the law as well.

"In wartime, it is permissible to attack military targets only," Shany explained. "This means targets that make a significant contribution to the other side's war effort: Qassam launchers, Hamas fighting forces, weapons storehouses and [smuggling] tunnels."

Military targets can be struck even if civilians will very likely be hurt, as long as the harm to civilians is proportionate, he explained. This depends on factors such as the military value of the target, the extent of the harm suffered by civilians and the measures taken to minimize this harm.

Thus, with regard to two specific dilemmas faced by Israel - whether to attack mosques being used as weapons storehouses, and also hospitals where senior Hamas commanders are holed up - Shany said: "A mosque is a more acceptable target than a hospital, because with a hospital, the assumption is that the harm to civilians will be far greater." And in fact, Israel has chosen to strike mosques, but not hospitals.

However, the professor added, even a hospital does not have total immunity: Firing missiles at it would be unacceptable, but a commando force could be sent in to capture wanted Hamas men.

Regarding claims that Israel has deprived Gaza of fuel and electricity, and prevented the evacuation of the wounded, Shany said that once Israel has taken control of the Strip, it must enable the population's humanitarian needs to be met. This includes an obligation to treat the wounded and to supply food, water and electricity. "The longer the army remains in an area, the greater its obligation to supply the local population's needs becomes," he added.

Similarly, when Israel warns civilians to leave a house before an attack, it must ensure that they have somewhere to go and access to basic necessities such as food and water. Nevertheless, Shany noted, when United Nations agencies examined Israel's conduct during the Second Lebanon War in 2006, they praised its practice of dropping leaflets to warn civilians to leave before bombing, saying this reduced civilian casualties.

Shany said it would be hard for anyone to sue Israel in the International Court of Justice in the Hague, since the country being tried must consent to have the court hear the case. However, he warned, individual European countries that claim universal jurisdiction could seek to arrest and try specific Israel Defense Forces officers for alleged war crimes.
 
 

Waar waren de demonstranten toen raketten op Israel vielen?

 
Het is misschien niet zo vreemd dat er geen woedende demonstranten waren tegen de raketten van Hamas, maar wel dat de media er zo zelden over berichtten. Pas nadat Israel met haar militaire campagne in Gaza begon, lazen en hoorden we af en toe wat over raketaanvallen op Israelische steden en dat Israeli's 15 seconden hebben om naar de schuilkelder of de safe room te rennen. Tijdens de crisis vorig jaar, toen Israel in reactie op de continue raketaanvallen 'pinpoint operaties' uitvoerde in Gaza en ook steeds minder goederen doorliet totdat op een gegeven moment ook brandstof en essentiele goederen niet meer werden geleverd, bleef NRC slechts spreken van 'raketbeschietingen' in een bijzin, zonder ooit iets te vermelden over de impact hiervan op de bevolking. Andere media waren niet veel beter. Alle aandacht was gericht op de ellende in Gaza.

Een van de dingen die ook steeds worden genegeerd is dat het staakt het vuren het mogelijk heeft gemaakt dat Hamas zoveel raketten kon verzamelen en overal tunnels en bunkers voor zichzelf kon bouwen, waardoor het nu veel moeilijker te treffen is. Na meer dan twee weken aanvallen blijft Israel overal tunnels, huizen en moskeeën vol explosieven en raketten aantreffen. Waar komt dat spul allemaal vandaan en waar haalde Hamas het geld en de middelen vandaan om dit alles op te bouwen en te verzamelen? Deze vragen worden nooit gesteld, want de journalisten zijn alleen maar met de gewonden in Gaza bezig en de vraag of Israel fosfor bommen heeft gebruikt en op welke andere manieren het het oorlogsrecht zou schenden.

RP
----------

Jan 12, 2009 20:38 | Updated Jan 12, 2009 20:57
Where were the protesters when missiles were hitting Israel?
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1231774431930&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

 
The deaths and maimings of civilians in Gaza is terrible and wrenching. Seen on television and in newspapers, they are driving innumerable people in many parts of the world to go into the streets to protest against Israel's attack on Hamas. The protests are fierce and angry, fuelled by tragedies like the killing of 46 people when the Israeli army shelled a school building in Jabalya refugee camp, and in the death of a family of seven.

But where were the protestors when missiles were falling on southern Israel? Had they come into the streets then and demanded that Hamas stop firing we wouldn't have the gory mess in Gaza today.
 
The rockets and mortars first struck on April 16, 2001. Since then, there have been more than 6,300. Last year's toll was more than 3,000.
 
For much of the time the rockets were primitive Qassams with small warheads. However small, they kill as effectively as any high-tech grenade launcher. The missiles have been getting deadlier: Katyushas and, more recently, Grad missiles have been reaching further into Israel, striking towns 25 miles from Gaza.
 
Casualties from the rockets have mercifully been light, with about 20 deaths. That is not due to any lack of trying by Hamas. Instead, it's because of air raid sirens which give people less than a minute to get into shelter. And luck: Last week a missile hit a school; catastrophe was avoided because the children had been sent home. A kindergarten was badly damaged this week; again, the children were at home.
 
A million people now live under threat of terror attack. Life is strained and uncertain.
 
THE GOVERNMENT has never been able to resolve the quandary of commanding one of the world's most modern armies and yet being powerless to halt low-tech rockets and bombs. It still hunts for a solution.
 
Public demands mounted for harsh action. For every rocket that lands, fire back a shell, said some; or for one rocket, one shell, for the next rocket, two shells, and so on. Obliterate Gaza, said others. Some, a minority, called for ending the siege of Gaza and greater efforts to talk to Hamas.
 
The government urged restraint. That became more difficult with a general election due on February 10. Defense Minister Ehud Barak, his Labour party sliding in opinion polls, put his political career on the line by refusing to let the army go in. His view was all the stronger because he was previously chief of staff and is the country's most decorated soldier for bravery. Those pressing for war did not understand what it meant, he said. He was backed by army chief General Gabi Ashkenazi and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.
 
They feared that a massive attack would cause heavy civilian casualties and loss of soldiers' lives.
 
The turning point was November 4. Israel says Hamas was digging a tunnel to kidnap soldiers; it foiled the plot by killing seven militants. Hamas says this was a provocation; it started firing rockets en masse, ending the unwritten ceasefire in effect since June. Missiles had still landed during that time: only 38, but enough for Israel to say it was reason for it to interrupt the flow of food and goods into Gaza.
 
In the third week of December, more than 200 missiles struck. They were 200 too many. Barak and Olmert accepted they could no longer hold back. The army was ordered to put into effect plans which had already been prepared.
 
WHY DID the world keep silent for so many years? Could anyone really expect Israel to do nothing for evermore?
 
That there is much anguish and anger about Palestinian suffering while there was so little response to what Israelis were enduring raises worrying questions. Are protestors giving vent to genuine compassion for Palestinian victims, or is there something dark and ugly under the surface in singling out Israel as though there has never before been a war in which innocent civilians are tragically caught in the fire?
 
How else to explain the extreme condemnation of Israel? The outpouring of so much hatred and the wild abuse of language and history in accusations of "genocide," "Holocaust" and the "Warsaw Ghetto"?
 
An official of Unrwa, the United Nations relief agency, was on television this week with a long and passionate call to end the Israeli attack. But not a word about what led to it. Why do he and others speak as though the Israeli onslaught came out of nothing, without reason or cause? Why, too, is there silence about Hamas' firing of missiles from the heart of civilian areas?
 
DIPLOMATIC MOVES are underway and will, hopefully, quickly lead to a ceasefire. But Israel has made very clear that it insists that there be no more missiles whether by Hamas or its cronies and that Hamas not be allowed to smuggle in new weaponry. The ceasefire will be of little account unless the world ensures that this is done and that an effective mechanism is put in place to maintain it.
 
The story, of course, is much more complicated. It has to do with Israel's blockade of Gaza and its attempt, unsuccessfully, to use this to turn the people there against Hamas. It has to do with Hamas' rejection of Israel's existence and refusal to forswear violence, and its power struggle with Fatah. It has to do with Israel's occupation of the West Bank and the slow moves towards creation of an independent Palestinian state.
 
The future for both Israelis and Palestinians depends on resolving these issues. Ending the onslaught on Gaza and halting missiles raining on Israel are the immediate crucial steps.
 
------------------------------
The writer is director of Yakar's Center for Social Concern in Jerusalem. South African-born, he was deputy editor of the Rand Daily Mail when the newspaper was closed down. He has written books about Robert Sobukwe; Nelson Mandela; and the press under apartheid. He is co-editor of Shared Histories: A Palestinian-Israeli Dialogue.
 
 

dinsdag 13 januari 2009

Olmert hoopt nog op Gaza overeenkomst via Egypte


Dit klinkt niet alsof er al veel vooruitgang is geboekt in de besprekingen in Kairo, maar Israel is blijkbaar bereid om ze een serieuze kans te geven voordat het de derde fase van haar offensief start.
 
RP
----------

Last update - 02:30 13/01/2009
Olmert seeks push in Cairo talks before Gaza op enters third stage 
By Barak Ravid and Avi Issacharoff
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1054915.html
 
 
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Monday sent a message to a number of world leaders that Israel wants to see a diplomatic move through Egypt that would lead to a cessation of arms-smuggling into Gaza, before the Gaza operation enters its third phase.
 
Olmert, Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni met last night to discuss contacts with Egypt. It is still unclear when the Defense Ministry's security chief, Amos Gilad, will leave for Cairo to discuss ways to stop the smuggling with Egyptian intelligence chief Omar Suleiman.
 
Snags in talks between Egypt and Hamas are reportedly behind the delay.
 
Emissaries from Hamas arrived last night in Cairo for cease-fire talks with Egyptian officials. They are expected to present objections to Egyptian demands but will apparently not reject the Egyptian initiative outright.
 
Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh said Monday that his organization would cooperate with initiatives for a cease-fire and an opening of the crossings in Gaza.
 
Olmert told foreign leaders that talks with the Egyptians were moving ahead, and that he was ready to give these talks a chance before deciding to expand Operation Cast Lead. Olmert told them he wanted to try to avoid an expansion, but would do so if there were no other choice and the Egyptian effort proved fruitless.
 
In contrast with his statements abroad, Olmert's has broadcasted a tougher message domestically. Speaking to mayors in Ashkelon on Monday, Olmert said there were two conditions for an end to the operation: a cessation of Hamas rocket fire and a cessation of smuggling and Hamas' strengthening.
 
The prime minister also said if smuggling continued after the end of the operation, and longer-ranger rockets came to the Gaza Strip, Israel's deterance would be compromised throughout the region.
 
"If these two conditions are met, we will cease the Gaza operation. Anything else will slam into Israel's iron fist. Will it take time? It will take time. We will continue for as long as it takes to remove the threat over our heads. We have reached marvelous achievements in the fighting," Olmert said. "This is the moment for the test to see who has stronger willpower, us or them."
 
Haniyeh, speaking on the Hamas television channel Al-Aqsa for the second time since the beginning of fighting in the Gaza Strip, pledged, "Gaza will not break - our victory over the Zionists is close."
 
Quoting extensively from the Koran, Haniyeh said, "We have placed our fate in the hands of Allah, what power do the sons of Zion have; Allah will yet take revenge on them."
 
The Hamas representative in Lebanon, Osama Hamdan, said Monday the Egyptian proposal did not meet Hamas' demands. In interviews with a number of Arab media outlets, Hamdan explained that Hamas would not agree to an international force in Gaza and to a clause calling for a cessation of "the bringing of weapons into Gaza."
 
Hamdan also said Hamas wanted an end to Israeli aggression in the Gaza Strip, a withdrawal of Israeli forces, a lifting of the siege on Gaza and an opening of the crossings.
 
Egypt, however, continued to insist on the principles of its proposal from last week: An immediate cease-fire (without an Israeli withdrawal), the beginning of talks on a long-term cease-fire leading to the opening of the crossings, and the third stage - renewal of talks between Hamas and Fatah to allow the return of the Palestinian Authority to Gaza.
 
The Hamas leadership is to meet today in Cairo with Suleiman and his aides.
 
Some 30 Palestinians were killed Monday in Gaza, bringing the total number of dead to approximately 920, with another 4,200 injured.
 
 

Hamas leiders verschuilen zich in kelder Shifa ziekenhuis Gaza

 
Het ultieme voorbeeld van je verschuilen achter burgers. Ironisch is dat dit gebouw indertijd door Israel is neergezet.

RP
-----------
 
Last update - 03:02 12/01/2009

Sources: Hamas leaders hiding in Israel-built Shifa Hospital basement
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1054569.html
By Amos Harel


Senior Hamas officials in Gaza are hiding out in a "bunker" built by Israel, intelligence officials suspect: Many are believed to be in the basements of the Shifa Hospital complex in Gaza City, which was refurbished during Israel's occupation of the Gaza Strip.

Shifa, the coastal strip's largest hospital, was built while Gaza was under Egyptian rule, before 1967.

During the mid-1980s the building underwent massive refurbishment as part of a showcase project to improve the living conditions of residents.

Millions were invested in the project, which was overseen by Shmuel Goren, the coordinator for activities in the territories at the time.

The Israeli civil administration in the territories constructed the hospital complex's Building Number 2, which has a large cement basement that housed the hospital's laundry and various administrative services.

During a cabinet meeting a week ago, Shin Bet chief Yuval Diskin said senior Hamas officials found refuge in the hospital basement because they know Israel would not target it, due to the patients in the upper floors. Palestinian sources told Haaretz that not all the senior Hamas leaders are hiding in one place.

Rather, they have spread out, and some are constantly changing locations. Some of the bunkers they are using were linked by tunnels Hamas built in recent years.
 
 

2 Huizen in Ashkelon getroffen tijdens gevechtspauze en de vooringenomenheid van de media

 
Hamas maakt misbruik van de dagelijks gevechtspauze die Israel sinds bijna een week in acht neemt, door juist dan raketten af te vuren op Israel. Toen Israel daarop een paar dagen geleden de lanceerders aanviel, stonden de correspondenten klaar om Israel ervan te betichten de zelf ingestelde gevechtspauze niet te respecteren. Ook heb ik horen zeggen dat er nog evenveel raketten op Israel vallen als toen de operatie begon, wat niet waar is. Het zijn er nu veel minder. Correspondenten zouden wat minder slordig en vooringenomen moeten zijn. Het lijkt erop dat velen van mening zijn dat:
* Israels strijd tegen Hamas niet te winnen en dus zinloos is, en daarom ook immoreel
* Israels operatie disproportioneel is, en onmiddelijk moet stoppen, los van wat Hamas doet
* De Hamas raketten weliswaar ook niet goed zijn, maar in het niet vallen bij wat Israel doet
* Israel totaal onverschillig is voor burgerdoden aan Palestijnse kant, en alles wat het daar tegenin brengt propaganda is
* Israel veel beter is in het 'verkopen' van haar kant, en wat zij zegt daarom met extra veel wantrouwen moet worden bejegend
* Het in wezen een strijd van David tegen Goliath is, en Hamas begrijpelijkerwijze verzet pleegt tegen het machtige Israel en zich niet wil laten kennen.
 
Kom je dergelijke vooringenomenheid of ronduit foutieve berichtgeving tegen in de media, reageer dan en maak de fout duidelijk.
 
RP
-----------

Jan 12, 2009 9:12 | Updated Jan 12, 2009 13:50
Two houses hit as Hamas rocket barrage shatters 3-hour calm
By JPOST.COM STAFF
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1231424932423&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
 
 
Disregarding a ceasefire which Israel voluntarily accepted for three hours in order to allow humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip, Hamas gunmen fired a Grad-type rocket at Ashkelon on Monday, damaging a house and sending seven people into shock.

Nobody sustained bodily injuries in the attack.

According to reports, the impact site was very close to a high school. Following the strike, the municipality, in conjunction with the Home Front Command, decided that the students would continue their classes underground in the bomb shelters.

Later, some fifteen minutes before the end of the humanitarian cease-fire, Palestinians in the Gaza Strip fired a rocket barrage on Beersheba, Ofakim, and Sderot. An empty house in Sderot sustained a direct hit.

On Monday morning, rocket-launching cells managed to break precedents, hitting for the first time the area of Kiryat Gat. The Sha'ar Hanegev region and the Eshkol region also sustained hits.

At least 15 rockets and mortar shells landed in Israel during the day. No one was wounded in any of the other attacks, and no other damage was reported.

For the past few days, the number of rocket and mortar strikes has notably decreased from what was seen at the outset of the operation on December 27. Whereas in the first few days, communities in and around the western Negev saw an average of 70 to 100 rocket strikes per day, over the past weekend less than 30 projectiles have succeeded in hitting Israel.

The IDF operation was launched after Hamas refused to extend a ceasefire agreement with Israel which expired on December 19. Israel has said that it would not cease its military activities until the Islamic group agrees to a permanent, long-term truce on the matter.

Wapens, Qassams en Katjusha raketten ontdekt in Gaza moskee


Dit is niet de eerste keer dat een moskee volgestouwd blijkt met wapens en raketten. De Gazanen die nu niet meer naar de moskee kunnen, moeten dus niet bij Israel zijn met hun kritiek maar bij hun eigen Hamas leiderschap. Dat die iets anders denkt over vrije meningstuiting en iets anders omgaat met kritiek is niet Israels schuld.
 
RP
----------
 

Last update - 17:25 12/01/2009       
IDF finds Hamas arms stockpile in raid on Gaza mosque
By Haaretz Service
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1054778.html
 
 
The Israel Air Force on Monday bombed a mosque in southern Gaza City, on day 17 of its offensive against Hamas' infrastructure in the coastal territory.
 
Israeli ground forces who entered the premises following the attack found a mass stockpile of weapons, including Qassam and Katyusha rockets.
 
The Israel Defense Forces continued its offensive against the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip before dawn on Monday, attacking dozens of targets across the territory.
 
IDF ground forces - comprising infantry, tanks, combat engineers, artillery and intelligence -were assisted by aerial attacks during the overnight operations.
 
The IAF reported attacking 10 Hamas targets, including five armed operatives, four weapons storehouses, two smuggling tunnels dug under the house of militants, one tunnel dug under Gaza's border with Egypt and one rocket launching position.
 

Troops from the Golani Brigade reported a number of hits on armed gunmen during gunbattles in the northern Gaza Strip. The Givati Brigade, meanwhile, uncovered one mortar shell.
 
The Israel Navy accompanied the ground forces during the raids, attacking Hamas locales from the sea.
 
The Israel Defense Forces on Sunday began deploying reservist troops to the Gaza Strip, for the first time since Israel began its offensive on the Hamas-ruled coastal territory 17 days ago.
 
An IDF spokesman said that despite the deployment, thousands more reservists who would comprise a new, expanded phase in the ground operation were still in training and have not been sent to battle.
 
Meanwhile, IDF troops late Sunday continued to surround Gaza City while the Israel Air Force launched a fierce attack on some 20 smuggling networks in the southern Gaza Strip.
 
Palestinian medical officials said some 60 Palestinians died in Gaza on Sunday, including 17 who succumbed to their wounds from days earlier. The IDF said some 40 militants were either wounded or killed during the army's Sunday offensive.
 
The location of the ground fighting, on the southwest side of the Hamas-ruled territory's biggest population center, suggested Israel was intensifying a more than two-week-old offensive. Troops had previously kept to the outskirts of urban areas in Gaza.
 
 

Goederentransport naar Gazastrook 12 januari en smokkelwaar onderschept


Hamas probeert misbruik te maken van de humanitaire hulp die Israel dagelijks doorlaat, door spullen voor zichzelf mee te smokkelen. Een paar dagen geleden werden uniformen aangetroffen, nu apparatuur om in het donker beter te zien. Dit misbruik, evenals het stelen van humanitaire hulp in Gaza, bemoeilijken de hulpverlening aan de bevolking van Gaza, maar daar hoor je de media nooit over.
 
RP
--------


COGAT: KEREM SHALOM AND KARNI OPERATE INCREASING NUMBER OF TRUCKS TRANSFERRED TO GAZA
(Communicated by the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories Spokesman)

 
Today (Monday), 12.1.09, a total of 3129 tons of humanitarian aid including basic food commodities, medical supplies and medication were transferred to the Gaza Strip. This is the largest shipment of humanitarian goods to the Gaza Strip since the military operation began. The commodities were conveyed on 120 trucks and included supplies for UNRWA, the World Food Programme, UNICEF a large Jordanian donation and goods for the private sector.

Also, due to an attempt to smuggle electronics, including night vision surveillance cameras, four trucks of supplies were turned back, and despite this cynical attempt to abuse the humanitarian platform one truck of electronic supplies intended to rehabilitate the electrical network was transferred. Since the beginning of Operation Cast Lead 22,046 tons of humanitarian aid on 926 trucks have been shipped to the Gaza Strip.

 
For further details, please contact COGAT Spokesman Maj. Peter Lerner at 03-6977138, 050-6234053 or dov_tpsh@netvision.net.il.

maandag 12 januari 2009

VN resolutie over wapenstilstand Gaza was serieuze diplomatieke misser

 
Resolutie 1860 van de VN Veiligheidsraad is volgens Israel niet evenwichtig en legitimeert Hamas. De resolutie heeft nauwelijks aandacht voor het probleem van de wapensmokkel, waardoor nu een miljoen Israeli's binnen raketbereik leven, maakt geen melding van de ca. 10.000 raketten en mortiergranaten die Hamas sinds 2001 op Israel heeft afgevuurd, en eist onmiddelijke en volledige opening van de grenzen voor humanitaire hulp met slechts een vage verwijzing naar plannen om de wapensmokkel tegen te gaan. Over Gilad Shalit wordt gezwegen en men eist niet dat Hamas de macht weer met Fatah deelt zoals voor de illegale coup van juni 2007, die als een fait accomplit wordt beschouwd.
 
Sterker nog, het feit dat de Gazastrook nu illegaal bestuurd wordt door een organisatie die volgens zowel de EU als de VS als terroristisch wordt aangemerkt, wordt in het geheel niet genoemd. Dit is een serieuze misser van de Veiligheidsraad, die juist deze oorlog had moeten aangrijpen om een einde aan Hamas' illegale bewind in Gaza te eisen. Het is dan ook geen wonder dat Israel deze resolutie, die overigens niet bindend is, niet heeft aanvaard, maar voordat Israel dit kenbaar maakte, had Hamas hem al verworpen.
 
RP
--------

ANALYSIS / UN Gaza truce resolution was serious diplomatic malfunction
By Aluf Benn
 
Resolution 1860 by the United Nations Security Council, which called for a cease-fire in Gaza, should be seen as an expression of the international community's discomfort about the continued fighting.

It does not dictate halting the Israeli operation nor does it demand the immediate pullout of Israel Defense Forces troops from the Strip before security arrangements are made to guarantee long-term stability.

But even if the decision bears no operative significance, it should stir concerns in Israel for three reasons. First, things are not going to get better. This is the international position, which identifies with the Palestinian suffering and ignores Gilad Shalit's fate and the suffering of the people in Israel's south.

Second, although Hamas is not mentioned in the resolution - which it has rejected - Khaled Meshal, Ismail Haniyeh and their friends have good reason to smile. Hamas' Gaza regime now enjoys the legitimacy afforded it by the Security Council, the international community's highest institution. That's because Resolution 1680 refers to a Hamas republic as a fait accompli.

The resolution does not demand that the Strip be returned to the Palestinian Authority, except in the call for a renewed settlement for the crossings, which will be based on the old agreement between Israel and the PA. Nor does the resolution call for disarming the militias and terrorist groups operating in the Gaza Strip.

Third, the process that led to the passing of the resolution points to Jerusalem's failure in handling the issue. Israel objected to having the war end in a Security Council resolution similar to the one that ended the Second Lebanon War. This is probably why Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni - who led those who oppose an agreement for fear it might legitimize Hamas - opted to stay at home instead of heading over to the UN headquarters in New York.

Israel made a similar mistake a few years ago, when it refused to appear before the International Court of Justice in the Hague when it reviewed the separation fence. And the problem with this decision is that he UN, like the justices in Hague, ruled without taking Israel's position into account.

A situation like this makes Israel dependent on the United States. But U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice supported the UN Resolution and assisted with its formulation. Livni was in contact with Rice in an attempt to soften its wording.

At the last minute, at 3:30 A.M., Prime Minister Ehud Olmert also intervened with a desperate phone call to President George W. Bush, requesting that the United States veto the resolution. Bush refused, simply instructing Rice to abstain from the vote.

One doesn't need to know all the details to realize that a late-night phone call between national leaders is the result of a major malfunction in the diplomatic handling of state matters, which reveals a problem in the relationship between Israel and the United States.

If it were not for Bush's friendship, the United States would have joined the supporters of Resolution 1860.

Vallen en truuks in de Gaza Oorlog

 
Dit artikel geeft een goed inzicht in de stadsoorlog in Gaza, en de truuks die beide partijen gebruiken.
Een cynisch feit dat bijna nergens wordt gemeld is dat het Hamas leiderschap zich zou schuilhouden onder het Shiva ziekenhuis in Gaza. Het is misschien inderdaad de veiligste plek voor hen, maar het is volkomen immoreel om dit ziekenhuis, het personeel en de gewonden, aan gevaar bloot te stellen, ook al is de kans dat Israel ze daar aan zal vallen natuurlijk miniem. Israel stelt het leven van de eigen soldaten boven dat van de burgers in Gaza, wat misschien niet zo aardig maar wel begrijpelijk en legitiem is in een oorlog, maar Hamas stelt eveneens het leven van haar strijders boven dat van de burgers in Gaza, en dat is crimineel.
 
RP
---------------


A Gaza War Full of Traps and Trickery
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/world/middleeast/11hamas.html
By STEVEN ERLANGER
Published: January 10, 2009
 
 
JERUSALEM — The grinding urban battle unfolding in the densely populated Gaza Strip is a war of new tactics, quick adaptation and lethal tricks.
 
Hamas, with training from Iran and Hezbollah, has used the last two years to turn Gaza into a deadly maze of tunnels, booby traps and sophisticated roadside bombs. Weapons are hidden in mosques, schoolyards and civilian houses, and the leadership's war room is a bunker beneath Gaza's largest hospital, Israeli intelligence officials say.
 
Unwilling to take Israel's bait and come into the open, Hamas militants are fighting in civilian clothes; even the police have been ordered to take off their uniforms. The militants emerge from tunnels to shoot automatic weapons or antitank missiles, then disappear back inside, hoping to lure the Israeli soldiers with their fire.
 
In one apartment building in Zeitoun, in northern Gaza, Hamas set an inventive, deadly trap. According to an Israeli journalist embedded with Israeli troops, the militants placed a mannequin in a hallway off the building's main entrance. They hoped to draw fire from Israeli soldiers who might, through the blur of night vision goggles and split-second decisions, mistake the figure for a fighter. The mannequin was rigged to explode and bring down the building.
 
In an interview, the reporter, Ron Ben-Yishai, a senior military correspondent for the newspaper Yediot Aharonot, said soldiers also found a pile of weapons with a grenade launcher on top. When they moved the launcher, "they saw a detonator light up, but somehow it didn't go off."
 
The Israeli Army has also come prepared for a battle both sides knew was inevitable. Every soldier, Israeli officials say, is outfitted with a ceramic vest and a helmet. Every unit has dogs trained to sniff out explosives and people hidden in tunnels, as well as combat engineers trained to defuse hidden bombs.
 
To avoid booby traps, the Israelis say, they enter buildings by breaking through side walls, rather than going in the front. Once inside, they move from room to room, battering holes in interior walls to avoid exposure to snipers and suicide bombers dressed as civilians, with explosive belts hidden beneath winter coats.
 
The Israelis say they are also using new weapons, like a small-diameter smart bomb, the GBU-39, which Israel bought last fall from Washington. The bomb, which is very accurate, has a small explosive, as little as 60 to 80 pounds, to minimize collateral damage in an urban area. But it can also penetrate the earth to hit bunkers or tunnels.
 
And the Israelis, too, are resorting to tricks.
 
Israeli intelligence officers are telephoning Gazans and, in good Arabic, pretending to be sympathetic Egyptians, Saudis, Jordanians or Libyans, Gazans say and Israel has confirmed. After expressing horror at the Israeli war and asking about the family, the callers ask about local conditions, whether the family supports Hamas and if there are fighters in the building or the neighborhood.
 
Karim Abu Shaban, 21, of Gaza City said he and his neighbors all had gotten such calls. His first caller had an Egyptian accent. "Oh, God help you, God be with you," the caller began.
 
"It started very supportive," Mr. Shaban said, then the questions started. The next call came in five minutes later. That caller had an Algerian accent and asked if he had reached Gaza. Mr. Shaban said he answered, "No, Tel Aviv," and hung up.
 
Interviews last week with senior Israeli intelligence and military officers, both active and retired, as well as with military experts and residents of Gaza itself, made it clear that the battle, waged among civilians and between enemies who had long prepared for this fight, is now a slow, nasty business of asymmetrical urban warfare. Gaza's civilians, who cannot flee because the borders are closed, are "the meat in the sandwich," as one United Nations worker said, requesting anonymity.
 
It is also clear that both sides are evolving tactics to the new battlefield, then adjusting them quickly.
 
To that end, Israeli intelligence is detaining large numbers of young Gazan men to interrogate them for local knowledge and Hamas tactics. Last week, Israel captured a hand-drawn Hamas map in a house in Al Atatra, near Beit Lahiya, which showed planned defensive positions for the neighborhood, mine and booby trap placements, including a rigged gasoline station, and directions for snipers to shoot next to a mosque. Numerous tunnels were marked.
 
A new Israeli weapon, meanwhile, is tailored to the Hamas tactic of asking civilians to stand on the roofs of buildings so Israeli pilots will not bomb. The Israelis are countering with a missile designed, paradoxically, not to explode. They aim the missiles at empty areas of the roofs to frighten residents into leaving the buildings, a tactic called "a knock on the roof."
 
But the most important strategic decision the Israelis have made so far, according to senior military officers and analysts, is to approach their incursion as a war, not a police operation.
 
Civilians are warned by leaflets, loudspeakers and telephone calls to evacuate battle areas. But troops are instructed to protect themselves first and civilians second.
 
Officers say that means Israeli infantry units are going in "heavy." If they draw fire, they return it with heavy firepower. If they are told to reach an objective, they first call in artillery or airpower and use tank fire. Then they move, but only behind tanks and armored bulldozers, riding in armored personnel carriers, spending as little time in the open as possible
 
As the commander of the army's elite combat engineering unit, Yahalom, told the Israeli press on Wednesday: "We are very violent. We do not balk at any means to protect the lives of our soldiers." His name cannot be published under censorship rules.
 
"Urban warfare is the most difficult battlefield, where Hamas and Islamic Jihad have a relative advantage, with local knowledge and prepared positions," said Jonathan Fighel of Israel's International Institute for Counterterrorism. "Hamas has a doctrine; this is not a gang of Rambos," he said. "The Israeli military has to find the stitches to unpick, how to counterbalance and surprise."
 
Israeli troops are moving slowly and, they hope, unpredictably, trying not to stay in one place for long to entice Hamas fighters "to come out and confront them," Mr. Fighel said.
 
Today, he said, "the mind-set from top to bottom is fight and fight cruel; this is a war, not another pinpoint operation."
 
Israeli officials say that they are obeying the rules of war and trying hard not to hurt noncombatants but that Hamas is using civilians as human shields in the expectation that Israel will try to avoid killing them.
 
Israeli press officers call the tactics of Hamas cynical, illegal and inhumane; even Israel's critics agree that Hamas's regular use of rockets to fire at civilians in Israel, and its use of civilians as shields in Gaza, are also violations of the rules of war. Israeli military men and analysts say that its urban guerrilla tactics, including the widespread use of civilian structures and tunnels, are deliberate and come from the Iranian Army's tactical training and the lessons of the 2006 war between Israel and Iranian-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon.
 
Hamas rocket and weapons caches, including rocket launchers, have been discovered in and under mosques, schools and civilian homes, the army says. The Israeli intelligence chief, Yuval Diskin, in a report to the Israeli cabinet, said that the Gaza-based leadership of Hamas was in underground housing beneath the No. 2 building of Shifa Hospital, the largest in Gaza. That allegation cannot be confirmed.
 
While The New York Times and some other news organizations have local or Gaza-based Palestinian correspondents, any Israeli citizen or Israeli with dual citizenship has been banned for more than two years from entering Gaza, and any foreign correspondent who did not enter the territory before a six-month cease-fire with Hamas ended last month has not been allowed in.
 
Israel has also managed to block cellphone bandwidth, so very few amateur cellphone photographs are getting out of Gaza.
 
But Israeli tactics have caused civilian casualties that have created an international uproar, both in the Arab world and the West. In one widely reported episode, 43 people died when the Israelis shelled a street next to a United Nations school in northern Jabaliya where refugees were taking shelter. The United Nations says no militants were in the school.
 
The Israelis said they returned fire in response to mortar shells fired at Israeli troops. Such an action is legal, but there are questions about whether the force used was proportional under the laws of war, given the danger to noncombatants.
 
The backlash from the school attack is another potent example of the risks in an urban-war strategy: Israel may in fact be able to dismantle Hamas's military structure even while losing the battle for world opinion and leaving Hamas politically still in charge of Gaza.

 
Taghreed El-Khodary contributed reporting from Gaza.
 
 

Hamas indoctrinatie: bommen zijn waardevoller dan kinderen

 
Terwijl velen verontwaardigd zijn over hoeveel kinderen door Israel zijn gedood in Gaza, en we worden overvoerd met bloederige beelden van overvolle ziekenhuizen en slachtoffers die op de grond liggen te creperen na een Israelisch bombardement, zien we niet hoe Hamas kinderen inzet voor de strijd, en al jong leert dat sterven voor Allah het hoogst haalbare is.
 
In deze video zit een fragment van een vijfjarig meisje dat trots is op haar moeder die zich als zelfmoordterrorist opblaast in Israel, en haar voorbeeld wil volgen. Ze zingt: "Now I know what was more precious than us." Ook enkele fragmenten uit het kinderprogramma "Pioniers van Morgen", waar konijn Bunny vertelt dat hij de Joden rauw lust, en kinderen die in Hamas uniform oproepen tot Jihad en het martelarenschap, met geweren zwaaien en trainingen volgen. Het zijn beelden die in NOVA of het journaal helaas niet te zien zijn.
 
RP
-----------
 
 
 
 

IDF ontdekt gebooby-trapte school naast dierentuin Gaza

 
Hamas schiet bewust vanuit burgerdoelen of de nabijheid ervan op Israelische troepen of vuurt van daaruit raketten af op Israel. Explosieven en wapens worden in huizen, scholen en moskeeën opgeslagen en de brave politiemensen die Israel op de eerste dag doodde schieten 's nachts raketten af. Hamas doet bewust het onderscheid tussen burger en strijder vervagen, van burgers wordt ook verwacht en geëist dat zij 'het verzet' steunen, en dat kan niet anders dan tot veel burgerdoden aan eigen kant leiden, zoals de afgelopen week ook bleek.

RP
----------

 
[ For video klick on the Haaretz link ]
 
Last update - 22:37 11/01/2009

WATCH: IDF uncovers booby-trapped school next to Gaza zoo
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1054533.html
By Haaertz Service


Israel Defense Forces troops this week uncovered a school in the Gaza Strip rigged by Hamas militants with a large amount of explosives.

The school, located next to a Gaza zoo, was entirely surrounded by a fuse connecting to the explosives. Inside the abandoned classrooms, IDF troops found a number of weapons.

"We are continuing to confront a mad reality of boobytrapped tunnels, boobytrapped schools," IDF spokeswoman Avital Leibovich said. "In one district of 150 houses, more than 30 were boobytrapped. Hamas boobytraps every house that residents leave."

Leibovich said residential neighborhoods in Gaza are riddled with homemade bombs and booby traps, including mannequins placed at apartment entrances to simulate militants and rigged to explode if soldiers approach.
 
 

zondag 11 januari 2009

IDF ontkent op chauffeur VN vrachtwagen te hebben geschoten

 
The foreign press reports were based on UN sources, who later admitted to the Post that they were not sure in which direction the truck was headed when it was hit, and could also not say with certainty that tank shells were responsible.
 
UNRWA haalt hieronder hard uit naar Israel, dat in eerste instantie beweerde dat vanuit de UNRWA school werd geschoten, terwijl later bleek dat dit niet vanuit de school zelf maar van achter een muurtje direct bij de school gelegen gebeurde. Intussen blijkt UNRWA zelf wel erg makkelijk Israel van zaken te beschuldigen, zonder dat het dat kan hardmaken. Omdat UNRWA (onterecht) alom als neutrale bron wordt gezien en haar versie van de zaak in tegenstelling tot die van Israel door alle media wordt overgenomen, heeft zij een extra verantwoordelijkheid wat dit betreft.
 
RP
---------

Jan 10, 2009 18:24 | Updated Jan 10, 2009 23:33
IDF: Army didn't fire on UN truck driver
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1231424908570&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

By AMIR MIZROCH 


The IDF was not responsible for the death of a Palestinian aid worker contracted to the UN and the wounding of two others on Thursday, the IDF Spokesman said Saturday. 
 
"An IDF investigation has found that it was not the army who fired on a UN truck at the Erez crossing," the IDF Spokesman's Office said. The IDF is not sure who fired on the truck, and is still investigating.
 
"The army further wishes to point out that the Palestinian wounded were evacuated by the Red Cross to the Israeli border, where they were taken by Israeli medical personnel for treatment at Ashkelon's Barzilai Hospital," the IDF told The Jerusalem Post.
 
The incident occurred Thursday afternoon at the Erez crossing into northern Gaza, the main entrance used by aid agencies to funnel badly needed food and medical supplies into the Strip.
 
Uncertainty shrouds UN driver's death
The version of events that claimed the IDF had attacked the aid convoy was widely disseminated in the global media, and it was only on Friday afternoon that the IDF posited a different theory.
 
On Friday, the Post reported that contrary to foreign press reports, it was not certain that an IDF tank shell hit the aid truck, and that in all probability, the aid workers were hit by Hamas gunfire.  

The foreign press reports were based on UN sources, who later admitted to the Post that they were not sure in which direction the truck was headed when it was hit, and could also not say with certainty that tank shells were responsible.
 
Foreign press reports said the dead Palestinian and two others were hit by tank shells. A MDA medic at the scene told the Post that soldiers in the field said Hamas snipers targeted the aid workers. A Post probe revealed that the two wounded Palestinians were being treated at Barzilai for gunshot wounds.
 
Reacting to the IDF's assertion that it did not fire on the UN convoy last Thursday, UNRWA spokesman Chris Gunness said the UN "was careful to source its information from eyewitnesses on the ground."
 
Gunness added that the UN was keen to "clear the fog of war" and get to the bottom of the incident.
"We've already experienced in the past few days the IDF wobbling on versions of events, especially surrounding the incident at the UNRWA school [in Jabalya, in which at least 30 people were killed]."
 
Gunness was referring to an IDF video released after the attack which showed a Hamas mortar crew firing from near the school. The video was taken in late 2007 and was not directly related to this round of fighting in Gaza.
 
"On the one hand we have IDF spokespeople accusing UNRWA of allowing militants into its facilities, while at the same time an IDF general is telling diplomats that the army had got it wrong," Gunness said, referring to a meeting at the Defense Ministry Friday at which the army told UN officials it "deeply regretted" the latest attacks against UN workers.
 
"The more Israeli authorities send mixed messages and the more they wobble on their versions, the more they lose their credibility. It seems they are tying themselves into a knot. The fog of war needs to be cleared. The Jabalya school incident needs to be investigated and in other cases we need to make the facts known," Gunness added.
 
The targeting of UNRWA workers last week led the agency to suspend its activities regarding the collection and redistribution of humanitarian aid in Gaza.
In a statement issued Friday, the UN said it would resume its Gaza operations.
 
"In a high-level meeting at the Israeli Ministry of Defense Headquarters in Tel Aviv, the UN was informed that the incidents which led to a temporary suspension of UN staff movements are deeply regretted and do not reflect official government policy. The UN received credible assurances that the security of UN personnel, installations and humanitarian operations would be fully respected, including undertakings of improved liaison and more effective internal coordination within the IDF.
 
"On this basis, UN staff movements suspended yesterday will resume as soon as possible. The UN will keep the safety and security of its staff under constant review," the UN statement said.
 
 

Israel zet Egypte onder druk voor regeling tegen wapensmokkel Gaza

 
Defense officials have noticed heightened Iranian involvement in Hamas' activity in the Strip. It appears the group's leadership has received promises from Tehran to "fill up the warehouses," possibly even with longer-range rockets, if it continues hostilities with Israel.

We vergeten steeds dat Israel niet slechts met een regionale Palestijnse verzetsgroep in gevecht is, maar indirect ook met Iran zonder wiens hulp Hamas niet zoveel raketten en andere wapens had gehad, en dat Iran Hamasstrijders traint in guerrillataktieken. Zoals Iran in de oorlog tegen Irak honderdduizenden kinderen als kanonnenvoer de dood in joeg, zo ziet het ook het Palestijnse 'verzet' als een ultieme vorm van zelfopoffering, die uiteraard door Allah zal worden beloond.
 
RP
--------

Last update - 03:00 11/01/2009
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1054285.html
Security cabinet: Israel to continue Gaza op to pressure Egypt

By Amos Harel, Avi Issacharoff, Barak Ravid and Yoav Stern


The security cabinet decided Friday to continue Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip, but not expand it at this stage. In the coming days Israel will focus its military and diplomatic efforts on pressuring Egypt to work toward the Israeli and international demand to deploy an international force to combat smuggling from Egypt to Gaza.

Palestinian sources told Haaretz that Cairo demanded Saturday morning that the militant group respond to its cease-fire proposal within 48 hours. Egypt warned that if Hamas rejects its offer, Egypt would be unable to stop Israel from continuing its ground offensive.

 Senior officers in the Israel Defense Forces told Haaretz that for further achievements, the army will have to expand the operation by at least 20 days and include reserve units in the fighting. A senior officer in Gaza said Hamas' capabilities were gradually eroding and that the group had lost more than 300 militants from its armed wing since the ground operation began.

Amos Gilad, the head of the Defense Ministry's political-security branch, will travel this week, most likely on Monday, for talks in Cairo with the head of the Egyptian security services. Saturday a Hamas delegation arrived in the Egyptian capital for similar talks.

A political source in Jerusalem said Gilad was instructed to address only smuggling into Gaza, and not other issues related to renewing a cease-fire with Hamas.

In Friday's cabinet meeting, Gilad told ministers that Egypt understands the need to stop smuggling, but that a program for doing so had not yet been formulated. "They are willing to sign on to deal with the issue, and we will continue talking with them until we reach a practical solution," he said.

Still, Gilad reportedly remarked recently that "the Egyptians are great at making efforts, but not at achieving results."

A high-level Israeli political source said Friday that without a solution to the smuggling including an effective supervisory system on the Egyptian border, the Gaza operation will not be brought to an end.

Israel made clear in talks with officials representing the United States, France, Germany and other countries that only a solution including an international presence on the Egyptian side of the Philadelphi route will satisfy Israel and allow it to end the offensive.

Defense officials have noticed heightened Iranian involvement in Hamas' activity in the Strip. It appears the group's leadership has received promises from Tehran to "fill up the warehouses," possibly even with longer-range rockets, if it continues hostilities with Israel.

Meanwhile, Damascus-based politburo chief Khaled Meshal Saturday rejected outright the option of allowing an international force at the Egyptian border, whether representing an Arab or any other foreign country.

Israel has "finished off the last chance and breath for settlement and negotiations," he said in a televised speech from the Syrian capital.

Also Saturday, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas criticized Hamas, saying the Palestinian people did not want to engage in "resistance" that will destroy them. He called for an international force to be deployed to Gaza immediately to protect its residents.
 
 
 

Egypte weigert buitenlandse troepen aan Gaza grens

 
Er zijn volgens dit artikel van afgelopen vrijdag nog grote verschillen van mening over een staakt het vuren, vooral wat betreft het tegengaan van de wapensmokkel via Egypte. Omdat juist door die wapensmokkel Hamas zo'n 3.000 raketten had die een miljoen Israeli's kunnen treffen, is dit voor Israel een cruciaal punt, en het zal de operatie niet stoppen zonder garanties wat dit betreft. Het valt dus ook Egypte aan te rekenen dat er maar geen einde aan deze crisis komt, niet alleen vanwege haar weigering internationale troepen te accepteren op haar grondgebied, maar ook omdat zij het probleem de afgelopen jaren niet serieus heeft genomen en haar verklaringen de wapensmokkel aan te pakken slechts holle woorden bleken.
 
RP
---------

EU diplomats: No truce because Egypt won't allow foreign troops on Gaza border


Last update - 16:33 09/01/2009    
EU diplomats: Egypt's refusal to station foreign troops on Gaza border holding up truce
By Assaf Uni, Haaretz Correspondent, and Reuters
 
 
Egyptian efforts to broker a Gaza ceasefire appeared on Friday to have to run into trouble because of disagreements with Israel over how to secure the border to prevent Hamas from rearming, diplomats said.
 
Israeli and European diplomats, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, said Egypt had objections to proposals for foreign forces deploying on the Egyptian side of its 15-km (9-mile) border with the Gaza Strip.
 
Instead of foreign troops, Cairo told Israel and the European Union, it was prepared to accept only increased international technical assistance to help its own forces combat arms smuggling through tunnels dug across the border. Israel is demanding the tunnel traffic end as part of a ceasefire deal.
 
"The truce talks are going nowhere at the moment," said a senior European diplomat involved in the effort. "There is a growing sense that the Egyptian-French plan is not going to work."
 
Jerusalem has said it will not agree to a ceasefire unless it contains regional and international commitments that will prevent Hamas from smuggling rockets into the Gaza Strip that could strike deeper into Israeli territory.
 
Hamas has demanded that any truce require Israel to end its blockade of the Gaza Strip and halt cross-border incursions.
 
That plan, announced by Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak after talks on Tuesday with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, called for an immediate cease-fire and for subsequent talks on securing Gaza's border and reopening its border crossings.
 
Following talks in Cairo on Thursday with top Defense Ministry official, Amos Gilad, Israeli and European diplomats described the gap with Egypt over securing the border as wide.
 
"They (the Egyptians) told us they won't agree to a force on their side" of the border, known by Israel as the Philadelphi corridor, a senior Israeli official said.
 
"Egypt would accept far more technical assistance," the official said, but added that Israel was deeply sceptical that would be sufficient. Egyptian officials were not available for comment.
 
Diplomats said an international deployment on the Palestinian side of the border was unlikely because of objections from Hamas, which has yet to take a formal position on Cairo's ceasefire blueprint.
 
Israeli officials said their Egyptian counterparts were skeptical Hamas would accept it. Hamas, which is seeking an end to Israel's blockade on the territory, had likewise rejected the presence of international forces.
 
European diplomats said NATO member Turkey was one of the few countries that appeared willing to send contingents to the border if an agreement between Egypt and Israel can be reached.
 
EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana has played down the need for ground forces, saying technology was the key. The bloc preferred to send "money and technology" to Egypt as part of any border mission, a senior diplomat said.
 
Relevant equipment may include sonar devices for picking up evidence of tunnelling and other means of geological detection.
 
Israel's 14-day-old assault on the Gaza Strip has included several air force sorties in which "bunker buster" bombs were dropped along Gaza's border with Egypt. The bombs send out shockwaves designed to collapse the secret passages.
 
Czech Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg told Haaretz he is not very optimistic about the possibility for an agreement that would bring an end to the fighting.
 
"First of all, the Egyptians would have to accept this plan," he said.
 
"We cannot decide about an EU force without the consent of the Egyptians. This is nonsense. President Mubarak was quite clear in his position against such a force. We are trying to find a solution, with a clear view of respecting Egyptian sovereignty," he added.
 
The longer the military operation goes on, the more Israel loses in terms of European public opinion, Schwarzenberg said in an interview to Haaretz.
 
The Czech Republic currently holds the rotating European Union Presidency.
 
"I do think that each hour Israel is continuing its military operation it loses in the public opinion in Europe and this is a process which is going on very fast and endangers the friendly government around Israel and undermines the position of president Abbas. I think we have to achieve a cease fire, to achieve a settlement, today and not tomorrow," said Schwarzenberg.
 
The Czech minister headed a mission by the Foreign Ministers of the European troika to the region earlier this week.

De vreedzame intifada

 
Waarom blijft Hamas raketten afvuren op Israelische burgers? Als het zich ook maar enigzins om de burgerbevolking in Gaza zou bekommeren, was het daar allang mee opgehouden en had het staakt het vuren voortgezet zoals Israel wilde. Het feit dat Van Bommel en zovele anderen die raketbeschietingen zo goed begrijpen en zelfs tot een derde intifada oproepen is walgelijk, maar zover als Daniël Teeboom wil ik niet gaan:
 
Toch heb ik Harry van Bommel geen oproep horen doen tot het beëindigen van het geweld. Dat komt denk ik omdat er nu eenmaal mensen zijn die raketten wel degelijk prefereren boven een diplomatiek proces. Die het prachtig vinden als de burgerbevolking van Gaza de volle laag krijgt zodat zij zich kunnen wentelen in selectieve verontwaardiging. En ik denk dat Harry van Bommel naar die demonstratie kwam en tot een intifada opriep om deze mensen te winnen voor zijn partij, de SP. Voor zover ze al niet gewonnen zijn.
 
Ik geloof niet dat hij het prachtig vindt dat de burgerbevolking in Gaza zo hard wordt getroffen. Hamas ziet dat als een noodzakelijk offer in de strijd voor het vaderland en verwacht dat iedere martelaar door Allah beloond zal worden, maar zo ver is Van Bommel toch niet heen? Van Bommel vindt dat de burgers in Israel maar met de raketten moeten leven omdat zij op gestolen Palestijns land leven, en hij is denk ik voor één staat tussen de zee en de Jordaan, en daarmee ontkent hij het recht van het Joodse volk op zelfbeschikking. Hij zal van mening zijn dat alleen daarmee een einde komt aan het conflict en het onrecht de Palestijnen aangedaan. Allemaal heel fout en verwerpelijk, maar geen bewijs dat hij de burgerbevolking van Gaza graag ziet lijden.
Verder een heel sterk en lezenswaardig artikel van Daniël Teeboom.
 
RP
---------
 
Letter & Geest
10 januari 2009
Daniël Teeboom

De vreedzame intifada

http://www.trouw.nl/opinie/letter-en-geest/article1940976.ece/De_vreedzame_intifada_.html

Dat Kamerlid Harry van Bommel vorige week zaterdag tot een nieuwe intifada opriep, vindt Daniël Teeboom niet zo vreemd. „Verbazingwekkend vond ik pas zijn verklaring achteraf: dat hij eigenlijk had opgeroepen tot een vreedzame intifada."

 

Wat ik een beetje mis in de discussie over het militaire optreden van Israël in de Gaza-strook is de vraag waar de noodzaak vandaan komt om Israëlische steden met raketten te beschieten.

Overal kan ik lezen dat het Israëlische optreden onethisch is. Dat komt, zo wordt mij verteld, omdat alle mensen in principe gelijk zijn. Om die reden mag je niet al te veel mensen van de ene partij ombrengen teneinde een handjevol levens van de andere partij te beschermen.

Nu klopt het inderdaad dat alle mensen gelijk zijn, maar voor een staat is dat niet noodzakelijkerwijs zo. Een staat heeft als eerste plicht zijn eigen burgers te beschermen, niet om rekening te houden met de vijand. Als een land deze taak niet serieus neemt, kan het net zo goed opgeheven worden.

Als ik me een Israël voorstel dat, zoals menigeen wil, niet zou reageren op de rakettenregen, maar in plaats daarvan tegen zijn bevolking zegt: „Sorry, Hamas schiet die projectielen nu eenmaal af vanuit scholen en woonwijken, daarom kunnen we niet reageren want dan komen er buitenproportioneel veel Palestijnen om, en bovendien is het best gezellig met z'n allen in de schuilkelder", dan is dat een land dat naar mijn mening geen erg lang leven beschoren is. Ik waag te betwijfelen of de bevolking van Sderot, Ashdod, Askelon en Ber Sheva zich erop verheugt om voortaan als schietschijf te dienen. Ik denk dat de mensen daar uiteindelijk hun biezen zullen pakken. Of dat ze zelf raketten in elkaar gaan knutselen om terug te schieten – dat kan natuurlijk ook.

Zou Israël onder de huidige omstandigheden niet met veel machtsvertoon om zich heen slaan, dan loopt het in het zuiden gegarandeerd mis. Trouwens, waarom zou Israël de bezetting van de Westbank willen beëindigen, als ook daar raketten vandaan kunnen komen zonder dat het land er wat aan kan of mag doen? Mocht Israël machteloos blijken om een einde te maken aan de raketbeschietingen, dan komt er nooit een oplossing en loopt de zaak nog verder uit de hand. Daarom, hoe vreselijk de oorlog in Gaza ook mag zijn, ik begrijp de Israëlische reactie.

„O ja?", hoor ik anderen zeggen. „Maar hoe zit het dan met het recht van de Palestijnen om zich te verzetten tegen de ruim veertig jaar durende bezetting?" Goed punt, denk ik dan, ware het niet dat er een aantal jaar geleden sprake was van een vredesproces dat door Hamas om zeep geholpen is. Toevallig dezelfde organisatie die in de Gazastrook zo vrolijk in de weer is met al die raketten. Om die reden denk ik dat Hamas geen recht van spreken heeft. Althans, het lijkt me een beetje raar om mensen die zich eerst met geweld verzetten tegen een vreedzame oplossing, nu te steunen in de voortzetting van hun oorlog – met als smoes dat een vreedzame oplossing niet mogelijk bleek te zijn. Behalve natuurlijk als je oorlog als gerechtvaardigd beschouwt en een diplomatieke oplossing niet.

De eerlijkheid gebiedt mij te zeggen dat ik nogal wat mensen die Hamas in deze oorlog steunen verdenk van deze opvatting. Zij misgunnen Israël zijn bestaansrecht. Een van de mensen die in aanmerking komen voor deze verdenking is het SP-Kamerlid Harry van Bommel.

Zaterdag was hij bij de anti-Israëlbetoging in Amsterdam. Wat mij verbaasde was niet zozeer zijn oproep tot een derde intifada, en zelfs niet dat hij meeliep in een demonstratie waarin driftig geroepen werd dat alle Joden aan het gas zouden moeten. Verbazingwekkend vond ik zijn verklaring achteraf. Harry van Bommel zei dat hij eigenlijk opgeroepen had tot een vreedzame intifada – hoewel iedereen weet dat de beide intifada's tot nu uiterst gewelddadig zijn verlopen en bovendien gepaard gingen met gruwelijkheden tegen de Israëlische burgerbevolking. Een vreedzame intifada is net zo'n onmogelijkheid als het bombarderen van Gaza zonder dat daarbij onschuldige mensen omkomen.

Er is niemand aan Israëlische zijde die beweert dat er in deze oorlog geen onschuldigen sterven. Iedereen, vriend of vijand, weet dat die de dupe zijn van al het geweld. Dat maakt deze situatie ook zo ellendig. Maar Harry van Bommel ontkent dat wel degelijk. De intifada waartoe hij oproept zal immers vooral tegen Israëlische burgers gericht zijn.

Kennelijk is het nogal moeilijk de notie te begrijpen dat Israël door de raketten van Hamas gedwongen wordt om op te treden. Mij lijkt het duidelijk dat de Palestijnse burgerbevolking van dat onbegrip het tragische slachtoffer is en dat Hamas dat helemaal niet erg vindt.

Met al die Palestijnse burgerdoden en Israëlische steden onder vuur, is er maar één conclusie mogelijk: dat Hamas helemaal niet de belangen van het Palestijnse volk behartigt. Er zou een onmiddellijk einde moeten komen aan de raketbeschietingen, zonder mitsen of maren. Want als Hamas raketten afschiet is dat niet alleen een misdaad tegen de Israëlische burgerbevolking, maar ook tegen de Palestijnse.

Toch heb ik Harry van Bommel geen oproep horen doen tot het beëindigen van het geweld. Dat komt denk ik omdat er nu eenmaal mensen zijn die raketten wel degelijk prefereren boven een diplomatiek proces. Die het prachtig vinden als de burgerbevolking van Gaza de volle laag krijgt zodat zij zich kunnen wentelen in selectieve verontwaardiging. En ik denk dat Harry van Bommel naar die demonstratie kwam en tot een intifada opriep om deze mensen te winnen voor zijn partij, de SP. Voor zover ze al niet gewonnen zijn.

Dat zijn trouwens vaak mensen die vinden dat de Joden het land van de Palestijnen gestolen hebben en dat het hier dus gaat om een vorm van verzet. Vervolgens wijzen ze naar het verzet uit de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Dat was immers ook gericht tot een bezetter. Daarom mag je het terroriseren van Israëliërs eveneens verzet noemen. Zelf dacht ik altijd dat het verzet uit die dagen zich bezighield met het redden van mensenlevens, niet met het vernietigen ervan.

Ik begrijp de steun aan Hamas dus niet. Daarom vraag ik nogmaals: is het nodig om raketten af te vuren op Israëlische steden? Hebben de Palestijnen daar wat aan? Sterft de Palestijnse droom als dat niet gebeurt? En begin nou niet over de droom van een Groot Israël, want die is al lang geleden gestorven. Mij lijkt het de hoogste tijd dat de droom van een Groot Palestina ook een keer het loodje legt.

 

Afgedwaalde Israelische mortiergranaat trof VN gebouw Gaza

 
Wel een fout van Israel dus, ondanks een eerdere verklaring dat men op dat moment daar niet had gevochten.
Hamas, dat vanuit een nabijgelegen binnenplaats raketten op Israel afvuurde, draagt echter ook verantwoordelijkheid. Alles wijst erop dat men expres vanuit de nabijheid van scholen, moskeeën en andere burgerdoelen raketten afvuurt op Israel omdat dit een win-win situatie oplevert: schiet Israel niet dan kan men ongestoord raketten afvuren. Schiet Israel wel en er vallen burgerslachtoffers, dan wordt Israel daarom hard veroordeeld en wint Hamas als de underdog sympathie van de internationale gemeenschap. Bovendien neemt de druk op Israel toe een staakt het vuren onder voor haar ongunstige voorwaarden te accepteren.

Moest Israel afzien van het afvuren van mortiergranaten vanwege de nabijheid van het UNRWA huis, en zo de beschietingen van haar burgers onbeantwoord laten? Het is makkelijk om 'ja' te zeggen nu we weten hoeveel slachtoffers de afgedwaalde granaat heeft gemaakt. Echter de raketten die Hamas aan het afvuren was en zou hebben afgevuurd als zij niet door Israel gestopt was, hadden ook burgerslachtoffers kunnen maken. Hamas was daar duidelijk op uit, Israel wilde dat verhinderen. Het zijn moeilijke dilemma's waarin we achteraf vaak net iets te makkelijk een oordeel vellen.
Israel had overigens een preciezere raket op de Hamas strijders willen afvuren maar door een technisch mankement was dit niet mogelijk.
 
RP
----------

Last update - 02:53 11/01/2009
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1054284.html
Investigation shows errant mortar hit UN building

By Amos Harel


A preliminary investigation into the fatal shooting by the Israel Defense Forces into a United Nations building in northern Gaza on Tuesday reveals the Israeli troops firing on the building missed their targets by some 30 meters.

Hamas is claiming the mortar fire killed 42 people and left dozens wounded, but senior IDF officers say the figures are dubious and that Hamas is inflating the numbers.

The probe, which was conducted by the Paratrooper Brigade whose troops were responsible for the area, found that the army's location system to pinpoint launch sites indicated that militants had launched a Qassam rocket into Israel from within a yard adjacent to the courtyard of the UN building.

The troops had intended to launch a smart missile to take out the Palestinian launch team but a technical malfunction made this impossible, according to the probe. The commanders of the force instead decided to fire on the Qassam team with mortar shells equipped with a Global Positioning System for accurate fire.

However, the GPS element has an error margin of 30 meters and one of the three rounds fired by the paratrooper force slammed into the building owned by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, or UNRWA.

Two of the rounds hit the yard used to launch rockets into Israel, killing two members of Hamas' military wing who probably belonged to the squad that fired the rockets.

Nonetheless, in discussing the incident with Haaretz, some IDF officers say the force should have refrained from using mortar rounds and relied instead on more accurate fire. Military sources said the UNRWA building was marked on the maps of forces operating in the area.

Other officers said they found the death toll published by Hamas grossly exaggerated, pointing out that a week ago only three IDF soldiers were killed when a tank fired two rounds - which have a much larger impact than mortar rounds - into a building which was occupied by 50 IDF soldiers.

Officers interviewed for this article pointed out that Hezbollah resorted to similar inflation tactics after an IDF bomb landed on a UN post in Qana in southern Lebanon in 2006.
 

Hamas dweept met de dood

 
"We desire deathe like you desire life"
 
Hamas geeft openlijk toe vrouwen en kinderen als menselijk schild te gebruiken: