maandag 19 mei 2008

Israël eist dat VN 'Nakba' uit haar woordenboek schrapt

 
"Nakba" betekent katastrofe. Het is een Arabische propaganda term. Een secretaris-generaal van de VN hoort de stichting van een lidstaat geen "katastrofe" te noemen. De katastrofe werd veroorzaakt door de Arabische verwerping van een VN-resolutie en hun poging een VN lidstaat te vernietigen. Niet echt iets om sympathie voor te verdienen.
 
"Ki-Moon has been supportive of Israel since taking office in 2006, but has recently been pressed by the Arab world to adopt a more balanced approach."
 
Dit is niet helemaal juist: Ban Ki-moon was evenwichtiger dan de algemene vergadering en de mensenrechtenraad van de VN, wat overigens niet moeilijk is, en dat kwam hem uiteraard op felle kritiek van de Arabische wereld te staan. Hij is nooit eenzijdig pro-Israël geweest en heeft de Joodse staat meermaals, soms in harde bewoordingen, bekritiseerd en zelfs veroordeeld.
 
 
Ratna (naar Ami Isseroff)
-----------------------------------------

Israel demands UN strike 'Nakba' from its lexicon
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3544098,00.html
 
World body's spokeswoman says Ki-moon phoned Abbas to stress his support for Palestinians on day marking 'catastrophe' of Israel's inception; Israel demands retraction
 
Yitzhak Benhorin
Published:  05.16.08, 09:41
 
 
WASHINGTON - Israel is demanding that the UN strike the word 'Nakba' from its lexicon, this after the world body's spokeswoman uttered it, apparently by mistake, in a press briefing she held Thursday night.

'Nakba', or 'catastrophe', refers to the refugee flight of Palestinian Arabs that followed Israel's inception in 1948.

The spokeswoman told reporters that UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon "phoned Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to stress his support for the Palestinian people on Nakba Day".

An Israeli reporter present at the briefing asked the spokeswoman whether Ki-moon also congratulated Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on the Jewish State's 60th anniversary. She said the UN chief spoke with Olmert a week ago.

Ki-moon himself was also surprised by the controversy created by his gesture, as he was not aware that the use of the term was unacceptable to Israel and is a part of the Palestinian propaganda against it.

Ki-moon supportive of Israel
 
Israel is demanding that the UN issue a statement to rectify the blunder and remove the word 'Nakba' from its lexicon.

The UN said the word had not been used by any of the world body's institutions or officials before, and it is estimated that it was purposely 'planted' by someone into the spokeswoman's text.

Ki-Moon has been supportive of Israel since taking office in 2006, but has recently been pressed by the Arab world to adopt a more balanced approach.

Foreign Affairs Minister Tzipi Livni said Thursday afternoon in her speech at the president's conference in Jerusalem that "with the establishment of a Palestinian state, we wish to see the end of the conflict. The Palestinians will be able to celebrate their independence if on that same day they also strike the word 'Nakba' from their lexicon."


*** Balanced Middle East News ***
MidEastweb
http://www.mideastweb.org
Subscribe - mail to mewnews-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

__,_._,___

Abbas: 'Ik stop ermee als er over een half jaar nog geen vredesakkoord is'

Is dit een dreigement? In plaats van Israël op deze manier onder druk proberen te zetten, zou het beter zijn als Abbas kijkt naar wat binnen zijn eigen bereik ligt. Wat kan hij doen om de kans op een vredesakkoord te vergroten? Vasthouden aan een onbeperkt 'recht op terugkeer' voor de vluchtelingen, en fel uithalen naar Israëlische kritiek daarop, vergroot de kans op het bereiken van een overeenkomst niet. Het opeisen van geheel Oost-Jeruzalem, inclusief Klaagmuur en Joodse begraafplaats, helpt ook niet echt. Israël beschuldigen van het plegen van een Holocaust op de Palestijnen zal de sfeer evenmin ten goede komen. En op Israëls 60ste verjaardag had Abbas misschien iets hartelijker kunnen zijn, en kunnen toegeven dat de 'katastrofe', zoals de Palestijnen Israëls stichting noemen, mede door henzelf is veroorzaakt. Abbas zou het recht van het Joodse volk op zelfbeschikking kunnen erkennen, en kunnen beloven wat aan de antisemitische haatpropaganda te doen. Al deze zaken zouden de kansen op een overeenkomst aanzienlijk vergroten, en daarmee, naar eigen zeggen, zijn kansen om aan de macht te blijven.
 
In plaats daarvan valt hij uit naar Bush vanwege zijn lovende woorden tijdens Israëls onafhankelijkheidsviering. Bush had het toen uiteraard over de Nakba moeten hebben, over de bezetting, en Israël moeten veroordelen voor de bouw van de nederzettingen, en zijn medeleven uiten met het lijden van de Palestijnen. Het is niet genoeg dat de VN, de Arabische wereld, de EU, allerhande hulp- en humanitaire organisaties en het State Department het daar al continu over hebben. Israël mag nooit geprezen worden, zelfs niet op haar 60ste verjaardag, en het Palestijnse lijden moet altijd in het middelpunt staan. Zo bouw je geen staat op, en geen fatsoenlijke relatie met Israël. 
 
Ratna
--------------
 
Last update - 20:59 18/05/2008
 
Abbas: I'll quit if peace deal not reached in six months
By Haaretz Service
 
 
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas warned Sunday that he would resign from his position if a peace settlement is not reached with Israel within six months.

During talks with former Meretz chairman MK Yossi Beilin, as part of the economic forum in Sharm el-Sheikh, Abbas defined the next six months as critical for the peace process and added that there would be no point for him to proceed in his post if a settlement was not reached.

"I didn't take the presidency upon myself simply for the role, but to fulfil a mission," Beilin's office quoted Abbas as saying. "There is no point in continuing in that capacity if it becomes clear there is no chance of achieving peace."
Abbas also said that regional extremists were coming out victorious under the current situation in which both the Israelis and the Palestinians are reluctant to make a deal.

When asked about Beilin's comments, senior Abbas aide Saeb Erekat that Abbas was determined to reach an agreement with Israel by the end of the year.

"In case of failure to achieve this goal, he will weigh his options then, not now," Erekat said.

Earlier Sunday, Abbas said that the address given by U.S. President George Bush to the Knesset last week had angered the Palestinians.

Abbas said he conveyed his disappointment to Bush when they met at the World Economic Forum on the Mideast, a meeting of 1,500 global policymakers and business leaders in the Egyptian Red Sea resort of Sharm El-Sheik.

"In principle, the Bush speech at the Knesset angered us, and we were not happy with it," Abbas told reporters Sunday on the sidelines of the conference.

"This is our position and we have a lot of remarks (about the speech) and I frankly, clearly and transparently asked him that the American position should be balanced," Abbas said. He had dinner with Bush on Saturday but it was unclear when he confronted the U.S. leader about his comments.

Arab commentators have said the speech, marking the 60th anniversary of Israel's founding showed strong support for Israel while barely mentioning Palestinian aspirations. The speech caused an outcry in Arab media, which called it offensive.

In that speech, Bush showered Israel with praise, strongly reiterated its right to defend itself and only gently urged leaders to make the hard choices necessary, without mention of concrete steps. He did not mention the Palestinians' plight; he spoke of them only in one sentence saying that Israel's 120th anniversary - in 2068 - would see it neighboring an independent Palestinian state.

Abbas told Bush directly about his concerns with the Knesset speech when the two met on Saturday at the Egyptian resort, according to Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat.

"We said that it was disappointing, and a missed opportunity, because you [Bush] could have said that the Palestinian people should have their freedom and independence in order to achieve peace in the entire area," he said.

On Saturday, in efforts to reassure Palestinians wary of his dedication to their side in the Mideast peace dispute, Bush said he was "absolutely committed" to getting an Israeli-Palestinian accord by the end of the year.

"It breaks my heart to see the vast potential of the Palestinian people, really, wasted," Bush said at the side of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. He spoke of a peace deal after the two leaders met in the president's villa at the Red Sea beach resort town of Sharm el-Sheikh.
 
__._,_.___

*** Balanced Middle East News ***
MidEastweb
http://www.mideastweb.org
Subscribe - mail to mewnews-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

MewBkd - Background & analysis -
mail to Mewbkd-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Weer roadblocks verwijderd op Westoever

In totaal zijn in mei al 70 roadblocks verwijderd, ondanks waarschuwingen van het defensie establishment. De Palestijnen hebben de gelegenheid te laten zien dat de defensie specialisten geen gelijk hebben en er nog 70 kunnen volgen zonder dat het aantal aanslagen toeneemt. Ik hoop dat ze deze gelegenheid met beide handen aangrijpen.

Ratna
---------------

May 18th, 2008

IDF SPOKESPERSON'S ANNOUNCEMENT

Bet-Ha'Arave and Sheep Junctions Opened for Movement

 
In accordance with government decisions and security assessments, the IDF and Civil Administration will implement a series of relief measures for Palestinians in Judea, Samaria and the Jordan Valley.

As part of the relief plan, the Sheep Junction was removed enabling unrestricted movement between Hebron and the village of Yatta. Access to the southern villages was also enabled.

In addition, Bet-Ha'Arava crossing will also be opened, and will remain open during the weekend.

Ten other crossings were removed in the Nablus, Tulkarm and Qalqiliya vicinity, totaling 70 crossings that were removed during the month of May.

The number of various permits was significantly increased as well, including: the number of movement permits between Judea and Samaria and the Jordan Valley issued to farmers and public transport; the number of permits issued to trucks traveling from Nablus to the Ephraim Gate; and an extension of NGO workers' work permits from three months to six months.

The IDF will continue to defend the citizens of Israel, while doing its utmost to allow the Palestinian population to maintain daily routine.


--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

zondag 18 mei 2008

Hamas: 'we zullen de zionisten vervolgen'

Een Palestijnse staat die zich uitstrekt tot Haifa, Lod en Jaffa, en dood aan alle zionisten - dat is de boodschap van Hamas, keer op keer, in woord en daad. Neem er kennis van, Carter, Van Agt, GroenLinks, SP, PvdA, Gretta Duisenberg, Oxfam-Novib, Pax Christi, Keerpunt, ICCO en het journaille. Neem er kennis van.
 
 
Ratna
-----------
 

Zahar: 'We will persecute the Zionists'

Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar said Wednesday that a Palestinian state will be established on all of the land of Palestine and not only on parts of it, and that it will include "Jaffa, Lod and Haifa."

Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar.
Photo: AP [file]

Zahar also reiterated Hamas' unwillingness to recognize the State of Israel and said that the group "will continue to persecute the Zionists wherever they are, after we prove that the Zionist army can be defeated - contrary to what was believed in the past, that it is impossible to beat the Zionists."

Speaking in the Gaza Strip, he went on to affirm Palestinian right of return, claiming that the "right of return of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians is closer than ever."

"After we defeat the Zionists we will persecute them… we will persecute them to eternity, and the sun of the freedom and independence of the Palestinians will burn all of the Zionists," he continued.

Speaking at a function in the Gaza Strip on Tuesday, Zahar also said that captured IDF soldier Gilad Schalit's release will not be part of a cease-fire agreement with Israel.

"We will not offer Schalit for free," said Zahar, adding that talks on prisoner exchange are not connected to talks about a cease-fire.

Captive IDF soldier Cpl. Gilad Schalit.
Photo: Channel 10 [file]

Antisemitische Hate Speech in naam van de islam

Kuntzel schetst een somber beeld van islamitisch gefundeerd antisemitisme in Duitsland en de invloed van radikale satellietzenders. Hij rekent af met de mythe dat dit antisemitisme een gevolg is van het Midden-Oosten conflict of de bezetting.
 
Op één punt is hij echter te negatief. Hij schrijft:
 
Still others gloss over Islamic anti-Semitism as an understandable reaction to the Middle East conflict, while organizations like the Left Party even see potential common ground with the Islamist movement.
 
Onlangs liet de leider van de Linkspartei, Gregor Gysi, zich verrassend positief uit over Israël.
 
Gysi also counselled against classic left-wing anti-Zionism. "The concept of imperialism does not apply to Israel," he said. Israeli democracy, he added, "is a really great achievement, that deserves admiration."
 
Hoe kan dit Kuntzel zijn ontgaan??
 
Ratna
------------

'WIPE OUT THE JEWS'
 
Anti-Semitic Hate Speech in the Name of Islam
 
By Matthias Kuntzel   Der Spiegel [Germany]
05/16/2008 04:30 PM
http://
www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,553724,00.html

 
Though most Muslims reject Islamism and its propaganda, anti-Semitic messages from satellite channels like the Hamas-run Al-Aqsa are helping to bring a message of hate and intolerance to Europe. The effects of such hate preaching can already be felt in Germany.

"Sanabel, what do you want to do to help the Al-Aqsa Mosque?" Farfur asks on the children's program of Hamas's Al-Aqsa television station. "We want to fight." "And what else?" "Wipe out the Jews."

Now Farfur, the cartoon character on Hamas's children's television program, is satisfied. Farfur is a carbon copy of Walt Disney's Mickey Mouse, but the Hamas version does something that Mickey would never do: He entertains children while propagating the murder of Jews.

International protests forced Hamas to take its Disney clone out of circulation. Al-Aqsa complied, but promptly turned Farfur's departure into an anti-Semitic statement: Farfur was clubbed to death by an Israeli official. Then the girl hosting the program turned to the camera and said: "You've seen how the Jews killed Farfur as a martyr. What do you want to say to the Jews?" A three-year-old girl named Shaima called into the show to say: "We don't like Jews, because they are dogs! We will fight them!" "Oh, Shaima, you're right," the girl in the studio replied, "the Jews are criminals and our enemies."

Farfur's appearances are typical of Hamas's anti-Semitic propaganda, which the organization also exports to Germany via satellite, hoping to breed new generations of fanatical anti-Semites and suicide bombers.

The Hamas station, founded in 2006, is modeled on the Hezbollah station in neighboring Lebanon, al-Manar. Al-Manar's children's program shows children wearing explosive belts and images of dying Israeli soldiers, with triumphant chants as background music. Cartoons depict scenes like that of a child blowing himself up near Israeli soldiers, or of a smiling boy flying toward Israel on a missile. Adult viewers can enjoy video clips that use inspirational graphics and rousing music to glorify the act of committing a suicide bombing, while the evening lineup offers family entertainment with a series of films based on the classic anti-Semitic forgery "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion."

In late 2004, France banned the broadcasting of al-Manar through the European Eutelsat satellite system, citing the station's anti-Semitic content. Nevertheless, messages of hate were still being broadcast into the living rooms of Muslims in Germany via satellites controlled by Saudi Arabia and Egypt, ArabSat and NileSat. Exposure to this programming was apparently not without consequences.

Rabbi Zalman Gurevitch was wearing a traditional black robe when he left his synagogue in Frankfurt's Westend neighborhood on Sept. 7, 2007. It was the Sabbath. According to the police report, he encountered a 22-year-old German of Afghan descent "spontaneously and coincidentally" a short time later. It was early evening and the man, shouting "You shit Jew, I'm going to kill you," plunged a knife into the rabbi's abdomen. Gurevitch was recognizable as a Jew. He survived, thanks to luck and emergency surgery.

Although this attack was an isolated incident, it is hard to overlook how hatred imported from Beirut and Gaza resurfaces in the form of daily acts of anti-Semitism in schools and athletic clubs, on streets and in the subway. Young children raised to be anti-Semitic are already using the phrase "You Jew!" as a derogatory expression in kindergartens and on playgrounds. Schoolchildren berate their teachers, calling them Jew dogs, for not offering Sharia-compatible instruction, and Jewish schoolchildren are attacked and feel compelled to switch to Berlin's Jewish high school and to hide the insignia of their Jewish faith -- the yarmulke and the Star of David -- when in public.

Neo-Nazi sentiments were behind the majority of anti-Semitic incidents reported in 2006. At the same time, however, the number of anti-Semitic criminal offences committed by Muslims jumped from 33 to 88.

In 2007 the German Interior Ministry published a study on the worldviews of "Muslims in Germany," the most comprehensive of its kind to date, which confirmed this trend. According to the study, "anti-Semitic attitudes were found among young Muslims far more often than among non-Muslim immigrants or domestic non-Muslims." The study cited examples of Muslim students to illustrate that this anti-Semitism cannot be dismissed as the product of an underdog attitude within marginalized social groups, but instead represents an ideological way of thinking. "The pervasiveness of sweeping anti-Semitic prejudices among Muslim students was also noticeable," the study pointed out. "Such prejudices, expressed indirectly by slightly more than one-third and in extreme form by about 10 percent of students, are significantly more common than anti-Christian sentiments."

What is the source of this profound hatred, which stations like al-Aqsa and al-Manar are spreading and one in 10 of the Muslim students surveyed embraces? The Middle East conflict is often cited as a reason, but this is too simplistic. Hostility toward Jews has existed since Islam came into being. In its charter, Hamas quotes the Prophet Muhammad as saying: "The Day of Judgment will not come about until Muslims fight Jews and kill them. Then, the Jews will hide behind rocks and trees, and the rocks and trees will cry out: 'O Muslim, there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him." Through the use of such language, the hatred of Jews is given a religious justification.

Nazi Germany entered the picture in the 20th century. The Nazis, hoping to use early Islamic hostility toward Jews for their own ends, paid substantial sums of money to support the Muslim Brotherhood's anti-Jewish campaigns in Egypt. And just as they had radicalized widespread Christian anti-Semitism in Europe, the Nazis did their utmost to radicalize the latent anti-Judaism that had originated in early Islam.

While everything Jewish was considered evil in early Islam, everything evil was now being labeled as Jewish, from wars and revolutions to the drug trade and the decline of moral values. Between 1938 and 1945, the Nazis' radio station broadcast its lies about a supposed Jewish world conspiracy into the Islamic world every evening. The professionally produced programs were broadcast in Arabic, Persian and Turkish, and were very popular. Thus, it comes as no surprise that the Hamas charter has also adopted this legacy.

The Jews, we read in Article 22, "stood behind the French Revolution, the Communist Revolution and most of the revolutions we hear about... They stood behind World War I ... There is no war going on anywhere without them having their finger in it."

Whether in the case of Muhammad or here, in both cases Hamas used sources to justify its hatred of the Jews that are older than Israel. But once someone has fallen for this demonizing delusion, he will find his anti-Jewish concept of the enemy confirmed in everything that an Israeli government does or fails to do. What is more, those who hold Jews responsible for all the world's ills will paint the Jewish state as the root of all evil. Following Hamas's example, they will celebrate or deny the Holocaust, even in Berlin.

Teachers in the German capital are sometimes confronted with Muslim students who expressly use the Holocaust to justify their sympathies for the Nazis ("I like Hitler; he did the right thing with the Jews"), refusing to take part in school trips to concentration camp memorials. During one excursion to the German Historical Museum, a group of Muslim youth gathered in front of a replica of a gas chamber in Auschwitz and applauded.

Can we blame Israel for the mindset that leads to such activities? Perhaps it would be more apt to conclude that the waves of hatred that the Nazis' shortwave radio transmitter once broadcast into the Arab world are now returning in the form of a delayed echo.

Building Street Cred for the Islamist Movement

Most Muslims reject Islamism and its propaganda. According to the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Germany's domestic intelligence agency, only about one percent of Muslims living in Germany are members of Islamist organizations whose political objectives include anti-Semitism. But the non-organized potential for radicalization is significantly greater. According to the "Muslims in Germany" study, between eight and 12 percent of Muslims hold anti-Western and anti-democratic views. "Attitudes ranging from strongly fundamentalist to openness to Islamism" are found among younger Muslims, according to the study. One of the respondents, the authors write, articulated a "desire for a young political avant-garde," which, the respondent said, must "take matters into its own hands."

Following the demise of the socialist bloc and the decimation of protest movements with a secular orientation, such a rebellious impulse does in fact shape the Islamist movement into an anti-Western avant-garde of sorts. As the only adversary of the global world order, it possesses an ideology, a lot of money and supporters worldwide. Advertising for the Islamist cause has used pop culture with as little inhibition as Hamas has unscrupulously resorted to a Hollywood cartoon character to recruit children. Trend-conscious clothing, music and lifestyle advertising bring "street credibility" to the Islamist mission. Online shops, like the Hamas-affiliated portal Islamicstatewear.com, sell T-shirts with expressly religious messages, like "Islam! Submit!," "I love my Prophet" and "State University of Mecca," while musicians like the rapper "Ammar114" (his name is based on the 114 suras of the Koran) use their raps to promote their version of Islam.

Other Muslim rappers portray themselves as representatives of a "Jihad Generation" and pepper their "intifada rap" with anti-Semitism of the worst kind. "Zyklon Beatz," a Berlin rap group, released a CD in 2006 with lyrics describing Jews as animals and demonizing them as devils in human form. Rapper Bushido, who won the prestigious ECHO Music Award in February 2008 and was broadcast live on RTL as Germany's best hip hop artist, stylizes himself as a Muslim assassin: "I am a Taliban . I am this terrorist young people believe in . I am King Bushido, and my second name is Mohammed. And I have set your city on fire."

In a rap video placed on the Internet, a Lebanese man living in Berlin chants: "Kill every Jewish pig, the Jahudis are unclean. They should all die and they aren't worth our tears. Arabs like us rule." Within a few weeks, his video, which translates Hezbollah's and Hamas's universes of hatred into a form more accessible to youth, had provoked hundreds of comments, most of them enthusiastic.

But one criticism of the German-language hip hop scene -- that such statements no longer provoke a scandal -- also applies to the German public at large. While the anti-Semitism coming from the extremist right wing attracts attention, and for good reason, there is too little awareness of anti-Semitism articulated by Muslims.

For some, hatred of Jews is as much a part of the Middle Eastern world as water pipes and mosques. Others say nothing because they see Muslims mainly as victims. Still others gloss over Islamic anti-Semitism as an understandable reaction to the Middle East conflict, while organizations like the Left Party even see potential common ground with the Islamist movement.

In 2003, the German Interior Ministry banned Hizb ut-Tahrir, an Arab anti-Semitic organization, and in 2005 it ordered Yeni Akit, a Turkish anti-Semitic publishing house, to shut down. And in 2007, the Interior Ministry supported projects to combat anti-Semitism among Muslim youth. But the Foreign Ministry has consistently undermined all of these efforts by accepting the importation of anti-Semitic propaganda through Saudi Arabian and Egyptian satellite broadcasters.

Meanwhile, a rabbit named Assud has replaced Mickey Mouse on Hamas's children's program. "Why is your name Assud (lion) if you are a rabbit?" a girl asked in the broadcast on Feb. 8, 2008. "Because I, Assud, will clean up the Jews and devour them." The girl nodded in agreement, and said: "May Allah's will be done."
 
====
Hamburg political scientist Matthias Küntzel, 53, is a member of the board of directors of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East. His recent book "Islamic anti-Semitism and German Politics," was recently published by LIT Verlag.


--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

PA houdt vast aan 'recht op terugkeer'

Meer nog dan de nederzettingen is het zogenaamde 'recht op terugkeer' een obstakel tot vrede, om de simpele reden dat het een tweestatenoplossing onmogelijk maakt, of je moet twee Arabische staten nastreven. Terwijl de nederzettingen gedeeltelijk door een landruil deel van Israël kunnen worden, en het theoretisch ook zou moeten kunnen dat er in een Palestijnse staat Joden wonen, mits die bereid zijn Palestijns staatsburger te worden, kan Israël onmogelijk 5 miljoen Palestijnse vluchtelingen en hun nakomelingen opnemen. Dat weet iedereen die even nadenkt, maar niemand heeft blijkbaar zin dit aan president Abbas en andere Palestijnse leiders uit te leggen. We roemen hem liever als een man van vrede en vallen Israël voor de tigste keer op haar nederzettingenbeleid aan.

Ratna
-----------

Presidency Spokesperson: Israeli Government's Statements on Right of Return Put Obstacles in Path of Negotiations
 
Date : 17/5/2008   Time : 14:00
http:// english.wafa.ps/?action=detail&id=11678

 
RAMALLAH, May 17, 2008, (WAFA - PLO news agency) - Presidency Spokesperson Nabil Abu Rdeina said on Saturday that the statements of the Israeli government requesting to abandon the right of return could not lead to any progress, but put obstacles on the path of negotiations.

Abu Rdeina warned of imposing facts beyond the negotiating table, affirming that the refugees issue is one of the key issues such as the issue of Jerusalem.

Abu Rdeina added that such statements are an attempt to escape from commitments and harm the peace process.


--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

zaterdag 17 mei 2008

Voor de onbekende Bedoein in het IDF...

Voor Israëlische Arabieren kan het dubbel gevaarlijk zijn om in het IDF te dienen. Niet alleen vanwege terroristische aanslagen op soldaten, maar ook omdat zij vaak als verraders of collaborateurs worden gezien, waardoor ook hun familie bedreigd kan worden.

Wouter
_____________

My brother, Beduin tracker
 
 
 
Last Wednesday, Remembrance Day, I had the honor of speaking on behalf of the UJC at a memorial ceremony in Jerusalem for Israel's 22,437 fallen. I would like to share those words with you:

It is a sad reality in our region that the wars do not stop for one moment. Sometimes they are at a higher intensity, sometimes at a lower one, but soldiers fall all the time, and the pain and grief are deep.

Since last Remembrance Day another 132 families have joined the "bereaved family" of the State of Israel. Among the soldiers who fell over the past year were three non-Jewish soldiers: First Sgt. Sayef Bisan from the Druse village of Jatt, Sgt. Menhash Albaniat, from the Beduin settlement of Kuseife, and a third soldier, whose name we do not know and whose picture we have never seen. All that appeared in the newspaper was a silhouette.

The Beduin tracker fell in a terrorist ambush next to the fence dividing Gaza and Israel, alongside his Jewish comrades; he had volunteered for service in the IDF.

We do not differentiate between the blood of fallen soldiers, whether Jews or non-Jews, but it struck me that although it is known who this soldier is and where he came from, for the Israeli public, he is an Unknown Soldier. His family requested that neither his name, nor his picture, nor even where he lived be published. All we know is that he left behind two wives and seven children, and that on the day he fell he was supposed to become engaged for the third time. No doubt, his family feared that they may be harmed in some way.

BEDUIN TRACKERS go ahead of patrols. They are the first out there, and they are the first to be injured or killed. They are aware of the danger; but nonetheless, they serve - voluntarily. No one can replace them. No one can identify the tracks and signs over the hundreds of kilometers of dirt roads along Israel's borders the way they do. It takes trained and experienced eyes, and this is what the Beduin trackers have been doing better than anyone else, generation after generation.

We frequently speak of the "covenant" between us, the Jews, and them, the Druse and Beduin. It is a pledge between those who are destined to live together in this country and give up their lives for it.

But these people hear very little from us about the covenant of life, the covenant between people who are supposed to build their lives alongside one another.

The Beduin tracker who fell on the Israel-Gaza border lived in an unrecognized village. Tomorrow, bulldozers could come to demolish his house, leaving his two wives and seven children homeless.

On this day, we must think of him, of his friends and also of ourselves, and we must promise to cultivate solidarity and mutual commitment - ours and theirs - not just in order to die for our country, but to live for it, together.

Thank you my brother, Beduin tracker.

 
The writer is senior vice president and director-general of UJC Israel and a former IDF spokesman.

J-Street: mythes over mythes over pro-Israël zijn

Net als 'gezond' en 'goed voor de lijn' is 'pro-Israël' een betekenisloze slogan geworden die critici van Israël geregeld gebruiken om beschuldigingen van eenzijdigheid en vijandigheid ten opzichte van Israël te pareren. Ik geloof dat zelfs Van Agt zich weleens een kritische vriend van Israël heeft genoemd, en heb je niet het meest aan kritische vrienden? 
 
De onlangs in de VS opgerichte progressieve Joodse lobby 'J-Street' lijkt meer kritisch dan vriend. De mythes die zij verkondigt over Israël en wat 'pro-Israël' eigenlijk inhoudt, door Ami Isseroff hieronder trefzeker onderuit gehaald, zijn zeer herkenbaar.
 
 
Ratna
----------------
 

 
In 5 Myths on Who's Really 'Pro-Israel' , J-Street's Ben-Ami makes a case for a dovish "pro-Israel" stand, citing "myths" about being pro-Israel. Not everything he writes is wrong, but he creates a few myths of his own:
Hamas won the most recent Palestinian national elections in a landslide. Do we seriously think that it can be erased from the political landscape simply by assassinations and sanctions?
 
Hamas did not win in a landslide, since they did not win the popular vote. Hamas is in power in Gaza by virtue of a coup. No, we do not seriously think Hamas can be erased just by assassinations and sanctions. Like Nazism, elimination of Hamasism requires more decisive action. But it is a myth to think we can "negotiate" "peace" with Hamas, just as it was a myth to think one could negotiate peace with Hitler.
 
Some more myths about being pro-Israel:
 
Myth: Just because Jews do something, it is pro-Israel
 
Ben-Ami tells us that not all Jews choose political candidates because those candidates are pro-Israel:
 

This urban legend has somehow become a tenet of American Politics 101, which is why politicians work so hard to earn the pro-Israel label in the first place. But it's a self-serving fable, cultivated by a tiny minority of politically conservative American Jews who actually are single-issue voters. Most Jewish voters make their political choices the way other Americans do: based on their views on the full spectrum of domestic and foreign policy issues.

The logic escapes me. What are you trying to tell us? If most American Jews are not pro-Israel, does that legitimize their stands as being "pro-Israel" just because they are Jews? Is J-Street a "Jewish" lobby or an Israel lobby? Those are two different things.  If Ben-Ami is pro-Israel, then why is he insisting on telling US politicians that they don't have to worry about the Jewish vote on Israel, since Jews "make their choices the way other Americans do?" The observation is true in part. One job of a group that is "pro-Israel" is precisely to marshall Jewish support for Israel, which is not automatic. Apparently, Ben-Ami disqualified himself and J-Street from that role, as he insisting on telling American politicians that Jews don't support Israel, a stand that he thinks is somehow pro-Israel.
 
 
Myth:  Negotiating ("Engaging") with terrorists and genocidal despots can bring peace.
 
Ben-Ami insists on negotiations with Hamas and Iran:
 
 Precisely because Hamas and Iran represent the most worrisome strategic challenges to Israel, responsible friends of Israel who'd like to see it live in security for its next 60 years should be engaging with them to search for alternatives to war
 
He needs to study the case of Chamberlain and Hitler.
 
Myth: A pro-Israel group can focus exclusively on pressuring Israel to make concessions.
 
A group that has no support program for Isaeli policies, and focuses only on persuading the US government to pressure Israel into making concessions  cannot be considered a pro-Israel lobby for obvious reasons.
 
Myth: Mahmoud Abbas and the Fatah are good for Israel.
 
Hardly. Must we cozy up to a corrupt group of people who insist, in Arabic, that their ultimate goal is the destruction of Israel? Abbas may be a negotiating partner or a peace partner and a lesser evil than Hamas, but we should not have illusions about Abbas and Fatah. Our relations with Fatah and Abbas should be correct. We don't need to be punishing Palestinians, but we need to defend ourselves and we don't need to be helping them undermine Israeli positions.
 
Myth: Undermining Abbas by negotiating with Hamas can advance peace
 
J-Street wants to negotiate with Hamas while at the same time supporting a peace process. J-Street should remember that Abbas and Fatah are the only peace partners for all their faults. Negotiating with Hamas and legitimizing Hamas will ruin the standing of Fatah and is suicide for the peace process. If you make a deal with Hamas, Abbas goes away and you have no partner.
 
Myth: The United States had a leading role in peace diplomacy in the Middle East
 
Ben-Ami tells us:
 
The best gift that Israel's friends here could give this gallant, embattled democracy on its milestone birthday would be returning the United States to its leading role in active diplomacy to end the conflicts in the Middle East -- and help a secure, thriving Israel find a permanent, accepted home among the community of nations.
The US has no leading role to return to. The Israeli-Egyptian peace was the product of an initiative by Anwar Sadat and Israeli reciprocation. After the Israelis and Egyptians prepared the ground, the Americans were brought in and were somewhat reluctant. The peace with Jordan was a Jordanian and Israeli initiative. The United States was asked to give pro-forma blessing and money, and to get a photo-op. The negotiations with Palestinians that led to the Oslo DOP were an Israeli and Palestinian initiative. America has played a role, but never a leading role. It could never accomplish anything that the sides did not already want. When the Oslo process fell apart and the Palestinians began attacking Israel, America demonstrated that it is worthless as a guarantor of peace because it did not do anything to stop the terror. Worse, it prevented Israel from doing anything. If America wants to have a "leading role" in peace, it has to be ready to demonstrate that it will stand behind the solutions it has brokered. In this respect, America has a "perfect" record and so does the UN - they have always imposed solutions, and then Israel paid the price for the "solutions." This has been true since the partition plan and the internationalization of Jerusalem, right up to and including the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza and participation of Hamas in the Palestinian elections. Both of the last were done at the behest of the Americans (Israel wanted to remove only some of the settlements) and resulted in the mess that exists today. Practically speaking, there can be no peace as long as Hamas rules Gaza. Is J-Street going to get the US to root out Hamas?  
 
Myth: All Zionists who oppose J-Street and negotiations with Hamas, Iran and Hezbollah are neocon troglodytes who think John Hagee is wonderful
 
Ben Ami wrote:
Are Israel and American Jewry really so desperate that we must cozy up to people whose messianic dreams entail having us all killed or converted to Christianity? Hagee, the founder of Christians United for Israel, and his ilk believe that Israel dare not cede any territory in the quest for peace, claiming that the Bible promised all of the holy land to the Jews.
 
A minor point - Hagee does not, as a matter of fact, believe in conversion of the Jews, so Ben-Ami created another myth right there. Don't confuse him with the facts. Not everyone agrees with Hagee's presence at an AIPAC meeting, which was not appropriate, but Hagee is not Ahmadinejad or Hamas. Are Jewish progressives really so desperate that we must cozy up to Hamas? Or are Zionists so secure that they can reject the hand of friendship from anyone? If mighty America can accept reactionary Saudi Arabia as an ally, how can the tiny Zionist movement reject the friendship of John Hagee and Christian Zionists? Are they really worse than Salafi Muslim fanatics? We do not have to agree with everything Hagee says about Catholics, territories and theology, but we can politely accept his support and work with him on the issues that are important to us. Can we say the same about Hamas or Iran?
 
Ami Isseroff
 

Duits schuldgevoel en de Joodse Staat

Wat voor Duitsland geldt, geldt in grote lijnen ook voor andere Europese landen. Wij moeten Israël niet steunen uit schuldgevoel voor het verleden, maar omdat de Joodse staat bestaansrecht heeft en vanwege gemeenschappelijke waarden en belangen.
 
 
Ratna
---------------
 
 

German War Guilt and the Jewish State

By DANIEL SCHWAMMENTHAL
May 14, 2008; Page A19

As Israel celebrates its 60th anniversary there is no denying that the Jewish state has an image problem in Europe.

Opinion polls in the U.S. consistently show that a majority of Americans are sympathetic to Israel. But the situation is the reverse on the other side of the Atlantic. It's particularly bad in Germany. In a British Broadcasting Corp. (BBC) survey last month, for example, Germans were among the Europeans with the least favorable views of Israel, second only to Spain. Even the respondents in the United Arab Emirates had a more positive perception of the Jewish state than Germans did.

[A 'Special' Relationship]
Associated Press Photo/Baz Ratner - Angela Merkel visits the
Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial in Jerusalem, January 2006.

This may be surprising, given that Berlin is considered one of Israel's more reliable allies in Europe. Successive German governments have justified the "special" relationship with Israel by pointing to the countries' "special" history. In light of the Holocaust, Germany seems to have no choice but to support the Jewish state. Former Green Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer advocated this policy of "historical responsibility" as effortlessly as Christian-Democratic Chancellor Angela Merkel does.

But guilt is an unhealthy basis for a relationship; it easily turns into resentment. This may help explain why so many Germans – 30% according to last year's survey by Bertelsmann Foundation – are eager to compare Israel to fascist Germany. If it were true that Israelis are modern-day Nazis, there would be less reason to feel guilty about the real Nazis.

Historical obligations also tend to have a statute of limitations. Postwar Germans may reasonably reject any special obligations to Israel as a result of crimes committed before they were born.

This brings us to the fundamental problem with Berlin's Israel policy. It implies that had there been no Holocaust, Israel would have no right to exist or, at least would have no reason to expect Germany's support. Israel's detractors take this argument one step further, claiming it was immoral to establish a Jewish state in the Middle East to atone for European crimes.

In 1922, long before the Holocaust, Winston Churchill debunked the idea that Israel could be justified only as reparation for past atrocities when he said, "The Jews are in Palestine by right and not by sufferance." Europe and Germany should thus be able to support Israel not just because of past wrongs committed against Jews, but because of Jews' inalienable right to a state in their ancestral homeland.

Israel's right to exist doesn't mean Germans must automatically back it. There has to be a special bond between nations to prompt support. Such alliances are usually forged around common interests and values. As the Mideast's most vibrant democracy, Israel should qualify for a truly "special relationship."

But unlike Americans, Germans rarely argue that Israel deserves solidarity as a Western ally. Americans generally see Israel as a fellow democracy under attack. But in Germany and much of Europe, Israel is often seen as a human-rights violator.

What explains this difference in perceptions? The U.S. media are not that much better in presenting a balanced view of the Middle East than their European counterparts. More likely, Americans are simply less disposed to believe the worst of Israel.

A key factor is Americans' appreciation of their Judeo-Christian heritage. While this is a common term in the U.S., it is a novel concept in Europe. Only recently has it found its way into the vocabulary of a few conservative Germans. Ms. Merkel and colleagues from Poland and Italy wanted to add a reference to the Continent's Judeo-Christian heritage to Europe's proposed constitution. The idea was rejected as too divisive.

But the term does not just cover the moral standards shared by Judaism and Christianity. Its meaning goes beyond matters of faith. It describes the fact that next to the Greco-Roman heritage, the Judeo-Christian tradition is the other main pillar of Western civilization. Acknowledging this fact helps Americans view Jews as part of that civilization and the Jewish state as part of the broader Western alliance.

In post-Christian Europe and Germany, this realization is largely missing. Moses's law, the foundation for Western legal codes and moral values, is hardly acknowledged on the Continent. Jews are more often seen as having contributed to Western civilization, rather than being an integral part of it, thanks to the role they played as a nation. Jews – often viewed as some kind of guest contributors – thus remain strangers in Europe, as does the Jewish state. And one can be inclined to believe bad things about strangers.

Given the similar threats Europe and Israel face from Islamic terror and a nuclear Iran, an alliance between them would seem natural. But as long as Europe's public considers Israel more as part of the problem than as part of the solution, any alliance will suffer. It's time for German and European officials to make the real case for Israel – that of solidarity with an embattled ally.

 

Mr. Schwammenthal is an editorial writer for The Wall Street Journal Europe.

Write to Daniel Schwammenthal at daniel.schwammenthal@dowjones.com

Hat tip: Israel News http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2008/05/israel-is-ally-not-charity-case.html

Pioniers van Morgen noemt Tel Aviv een Palestijnse stad

 
Nog meer verzoenende woorden van Hamas.

----------

MEMRI Special Dispatch Series - No. 1928
May 14, 2008No. 1928

Grandfather of Hamas TV Bunny Assud Insists Tel Aviv Was a Palestinian City

Following is an excerpt from the Hamas children's show "The Pioneers of Tomorrow," which aired on Al-Aqsa TV on May 9, 2008:
To view this clip, visit
www.memritv.org/clip/en/1766.htm .

 
"[Tel Aviv] Was Called Tel Al-Rabi', But the Zionists and Jews Hebraicized the Name to 'Tel Aviv'"
Assud the Bunny: "Grandpa, where did you live? In what city?"

Grandpa: "We used to live in the most beautiful place in Palestine."

Assud: "Where?"

Grandpa: "My dear, you've never seen such a place. I used to live in Tel Al-Rabi' [the Arab word for 'spring,' which is 'aviv' in Hebrew]. What a beautiful place. My God, when I recall Tel Al-Rabi', which the Zionists have called..."

Assud: "There's no such place called Tel Al-Rabi'. What's the matter, Grandpa? Have you gone senile?"

Grandpa: "I'm not senile. My head is working just fine. How can you say I'm senile? This place was called Tel Al-Rabi', but the Zionists and Jews Hebraicized the name to 'Tel Aviv.' Where did this 'Tel Aviv' come from? It has been Tel Al-Rabi' for generations, on the land of Palestine, right next to Yafa. How can you say I've gone senile? I know this. My head still works just fine. Are you trying to confuse me? I'm not senile yet. I have documents and proof. I have all the papers here. The documents are right here with me. How can you say I'm senile? I have all the documents with me. Here they are. Everything is here, from the days of the British and even before. This is our land, as well as the fields, the trees, and the houses. I can even show you the key. You're calling me senile? I have proof."

"It's the Fault of the School Curricula, Which Did Not Teach Us That Tel Aviv Is In Fact Tel Al-Rabi'"

Assud: "Forgive me, Grandpa, it's not our fault. It's the fault of the school curricula, which did not teach us that Tel Aviv is in fact Tel Al-Rabi', and vice versa."

Grandpa: "No, my dear, take it from me. I know, and I have the papers and the land deeds. The name Tel Al-Rabi' has been forged by the Jews and Hebraicized to 'Tel Aviv.' They invented all these names. 'Ashdod' is, in fact, Isdud. 'Ashkelon' is, in fact, Al-Majdal. Where did they get these names? Al-Sab' is called 'Beer Sheva'! It's all a lie. There are all pseudonyms. Yafa, Al-Lydd, Al-Ramla, Al-Sab' - they changed all these names and Hebraicized them, and now they say: That's Tel Al-Rabi'? There is no such thing. It's Tel Aviv. It's all a lie. All these names were Hebraicized by the Jews."


--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

Israël draagt beveiliging Jenin over aan Palestijnen

Jenin staat bekend als een basis voor Palestijnse terroristen, dus laten we hopen dat dit goed gaat. Het grootste probleem mijns inziens is dat veel van Abbas' veiligheidstroepen ideologisch geheel achter de 'gewapende strijd' tegen Israël staan en niet erg gemotiveerd zijn om hun broeders op te pakken of te 'verraden'.
Bij een soortgelijk experiment in Nablus werd Israël internationaal streng veroordeeld voor het oppakken van terroristen en het onschadelijk maken van in hun bezit zijnde explosieven, terwijl de Palestijnse veiligheidsdiensten, die hier duidelijk verstek hadden laten gaan, vrijuit gingen. Als de Palestijnse veiligheidstroepen wel mensen arresteerden, zijn die de laatste tijd geregeld 'ontsnapt' of werden snel weer op vrije voeten gesteld.
 
Misschien moet Israël bij dit soort dingen vantevoren de eis stellen dat, als er iets mis gaat, haar kant van het verhaal ook serieus genomen wordt.

 
Ratna
------------
 
Israel to transfer security in Jenin area to Palestinians
 
By Barak Ravid and Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz Correspondents
Last update - 05:23 14/05/2008
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/983279.html

 
Israel and the Palestinians have been discussing an almost complete transfer of security responsibility the Palestinian Authority security forces in order to turn the area into a "model region" - where Israeli presence is almost non-existent.

Sources in the Defense Ministry on Tuesday confirmed that talks on the new security arrangements were underway with American mediation and that of Quartet representative Tony Blair.

On Tuesday Blair presented several measures to ease life for the Palestinians in the West Bank, to which Israel and the PA had agreed ahead of the visit of U.S. President George W. Bush, who arrives in Israel Wednesday.

According to the arrangements being formulated, which are to be implemented in the coming months, the PA will be responsible for security in the area north and east of Tul Karm, including Jenin, an area equal in size to the Gaza Strip. The plan calls for full Palestinian control from 6 A.M. to midnight and joint control with the Israelis during the night.

Israel will still be able to enter Jenin and its environs to act against "ticking bombs," that is, someone who has knowledge of a terror attack to be carried out. In other cases, Israel will transfer the names of wanted men to the PA security forces, and if the PA forces do not arrest those wanted, the IDF will be able to do so.

In talks with the Palestinians, Blair and the American generals made clear that the PA would have to operate not only against Hamas, but also against all terrorists, including those who are part of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades of the Fatah movement.

The Palestinian force in the northern West Bank will include more than 1,000 police personnel, most of who were trained by the U.S. in Jordan. More that 600 personnel are due to arrive in July, to join the more than 500 men who were recently stationed in Jenin and its environs.

New prison, new court

To strengthen the PA, Israel has agreed to the construction of a new prison in Jenin to replace the one Israel destroyed in the second intifada. Israel also approved four new police stations for the area. The PA will also open a new court in Jenin. Israel has also agreed to remove roadblocks in the northern West Bank to ease the movement of Palestinian vehicles into Jenin and to Nablus and the Jordan Valley, in keeping with security considerations.

On the economic front, Blair announced at a press conference Tuesday in Jerusalem that Israel has agreed to allocate a frequency range that would enable a second Palestinian cell-phone operator. Blair said the range would be 2.4 Megahertz for now, but that Israel was going to commit in writing within six to eight months to double the frequency range.

Israel had delayed its approval of the frequency range for some time, among other reasons, because of objections from the Shin Bet security service and the army. Blair said the move would contribute to the improvement of the Palestinian economy, as the PA stood to earn more than $350 million from license fees. He also said the cellular operator would be investing more than $700 million over the next 10 years, creating some 750 new jobs.

A new industrial area is also to be built by the end of the year at Jalameh, north of Jenin, which is to be funded by the German government.

Israel also agreed to give work permits in Israel to about 1,000 laborers and some 300 merchants from Jenin.

Reevaluating demolition orders

Israel will also be reevaluating about 1,000 demolition orders for illegally built Palestinian homes, and will allow Palestinian customs officers to be stationed at the Allenby Bridge as a prelude to the establishment of a Palestinian border administration.

The commander of the Palestinian security forces in the Jenin area, Brigadier General Suleiman Imran, on Tuesday said that his forces are already operating against armed men in the area, including villages under Israeli security control. "There will be no weapons in this sector that do not belong to the PA. Only the law will rule," he said.

Imran said his men were operating in the area from Jalameh in the north, down to but not including Nablus in the south, and to the Green Line in the west. He said the coming days would see a widening of the operation to the Far'a refugee camp in the east, near the Jordan Valley. However, he added, so far no agreement had been reached that Israel would stop making arrests in the area. "The matter of security responsibility is in the hands of Israel for the present, but the parties are discussing it," Imran said.

People in Jenin said the PA forces in Jenin had been able recently to reduce crime in the city, and that armed men are now rarely seen there or the surrounding villages.
Blair initially raised the idea to make the Jenin area a model for PA security control a few months ago, in an attempt to show the residents of the West Bank a meaningful change on the ground. In his talks with the Israelis and the Palestinians, Blair said only such a move would significantly move ahead negotiations on the core issues of the final-status agreement. Blair initially proposed the arrangement for Hebron, but given the tensions and sensitivities in that city, Israel suggested Jenin instead.

Blair discussed the initiative in a series of meetings with the U.S. mediators, generals James Jones and Keith Dayton, with Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, as well as at a number of three-way meetings. As far as is known, Barak and the IDF brass have expressed their support for the plan now being formulated.

Discussions on the new arrangements are taking into consideration lessons learned from the previous transfer of security responsibility to the Palestinians, in Nablus a few months ago. One of the conclusions was that the Nablus transfer was not particularly successful because clear and agreed-on rules of coordination between the IDF and the Palestinian security forces were not set.


------------------------------------

*** Balanced Middle East News ***
MidEastweb
http://www.mideastweb.org
Subscribe - mail to mewnews-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

MewBkd - Background & analysis -
mail to
Mewbkd-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

News Letter -  our commentary -
mail to
mideastweb-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

vrijdag 16 mei 2008

Nakba protesten leiden tot rellen

"On this occasion, the occasion of the Nakba, we reiterate that we will never recognize the raping enemy. We will never recognize Israel. We will never recognize Israel," al-Zahar told a cheering audience.

"Our lands are not for sale or for trade, and the right of resistance is holy," he said.

"Israel is going to disappear one day and the Palestinian people will remain to fully liberate all their occupied lands," he told the conference, entitled "Sixty years since the Nakba - the return is imminent."


 
Wat aan het bovenstaande is niet duidelijk? Hamas spreekt niet alleen in woorden, maar ook in daden

Ratna
----------

 
Palestinians clash with IDF troops during Nakba protests

Last update - 16:30 14/05/2008
By Agencies and Haaretz Service
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/983406.html

 
Marking the 60th anniversary of what Israelis call independence but Palestinians call the "Nakba" (or the "Catastrophe"), hundreds of Palestinians clashed with Israel Defense Forces soldiers on Wednesday at military checkpoints in the West Bank.

Some six people were reported injured at the Qalandiyah checkpoint, north of Jerusalem, as the protesters threw stones at IDF troops, who responded with rubber bullets and tear gas.

In the West Bank city of Nablus, soldiers used tear gas to disperse a small crowd of protesters approaching an IDF checkpoint on the town's edge.

Clashes also erupted at a number of other checkpoints, including Abu Dis and Shuafat, to the east and north-east of Jerusalem, and Hawara, near Nablus.

Local leaders called on Palestinian refugees to stage a symbolic march to the homes they, their parents, or grandparents lost 60 years ago in what is now Israel.

Hundreds of residents of camps in Lebanon were also seen protesting near Israel's northern border, waving Palestinian and United Nations flags.

Israel celebrated the 60th anniversary of its May 14, 1948 independence declaration last week, in accordance with the Hebrew calendar date. Israel is hosting another round of festivities at the Presidential Conference this week, and has been joined by dozens of foreign leaders, including U.S. President George W. Bush.

Palestinians will hold more events marking the Nakba on Thursday.

Meanwhile, parents of Arab children at a joint Arab-Jewish elementary school in Jerusalem on Wednesday protested the removal of Palestinian flags at the school, which had been hung up to mark the Nakba. The flags were taken down ahead of a visit by U.S. First Lady Laura Bush.

"This school teaches our children about mutual respect and cooperation. Over the course of two weeks, Israeli flags were hung proudly. It hurts me that my daughter was forced to witness her flag being hidden," said one mother.

Last week, Israeli flags were hung throughout the school in honor of Israel's 60th anniversary.

According to parents, the flags and symbols were placed in storage and they were told that only colorful drawings would be hung on the bulletin boards.

In Gaza, the ruling Islamic militant Hamas wants supporters to march toward a main passenger crossing with Israel. Gaza has been virtually sealed since the violent Hamas takeover a year ago.

Arab students at Israeli universities in Haifa and Jerusalem were planning Nakba marches. In Jerusalem, artists were planning to exhibit 3,000 figurines, meant to represent Palestinian refugees.

During the 1948 War of Independence, hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were uprooted and scattered across the region. Along with their descendants, they now make up about 4.5 million, according to United Nations figures.

Commemorations are meant to direct attention to the unresolved plight of Palestinian refugees, and to encourage young Palestinians to learn their history, activists said. The fate of refugees is a key issue in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks which resumed earlier this year, but have yielded little progress.

Plans include flying thousands of black balloons in a show of mourning, rallies in the West Bank and Gaza and the screening of films about Palestinian history.

In Gaza, meanwhile, senior Hamas official Mahmoud al-Zahar told a conference commemorating the Nakba that his radical Islamic movement would "never" recognize Israel, which he said will one day "disappear."

"On this occasion, the occasion of the Nakba, we reiterate that we will never recognize the raping enemy. We will never recognize Israel. We will never recognize Israel," al-Zahar told a cheering audience.

"Our lands are not for sale or for trade, and the right of resistance is holy," he said.

"Israel is going to disappear one day and the Palestinian people will remain to fully liberate all their occupied lands," he told the conference, entitled "Sixty years since the Nakba - the return is imminent."

"The day of liberation and return is coming very soon," al-Zahar said. "We are good readers of reality and the powers of war and destruction are not terrifying us."

Bush arrived in Israel to much fanfare on Wednesday for a 48-hour visit in honor of Israel's 60th anniversary. The visit is his second in four months.

Regarding Bush's visit, Zahar said, "There is no welcome for Bush in the Holy Land. There is no welcome for hypocrite presidents who are defiling our land."

 
*** Balanced Middle East News ***
MidEastweb http://www.mideastweb.org
Subscribe - mail to mewnews-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

MewBkd - Background & analysis -
mail to Mewbkd-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

News Letter -  our commentary -
mail to mideastweb-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Terughoudende reaktie Israël verwacht

De raketaanval op Ashkelon waarbij 15 mensen gewond raakten, was niet toevallig, maar goed voorbereid en getimed. Hamas wilde zowel aan Bush als aan Israël laten zien dat ze rekening met Hamas moeten houden, en dat Hamas Israëls voorwaarden voor een staakt-het-vuren niet zal accepteren. Bovendien weet Hamas dat Israëls handen momenteel erg gebonden zijn en het dus geen grootschalige operatie hoeft te vrezen. 
 
Israël zal Hamas op gepaste wijze moeten duidelijk maken dat het een staakt-het-vuren minder nodig heeft dan Hamas.
 
 
Ratna
-------------

Restrained response expected
Retaliation for Ashkelon attack will come soon but IDF won't be using its full force
 
Ron Ben Yishai Published: 05.15.08, 01:05
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3543556,00.html

 
Hamas prepared itself well for the Grad rocket attack on the mall in Ashkelon that wounded 15 Israelis and left dozens more suffering from anxiety. Three days ago already, Hamas started to target Ashkelon, and as it turns out the fire was not coincidental. It appears Hamas was preparing to welcome President Bush with an impressive rocket attack, and therefore it prepared thoroughly. The Israeli response is expected to be immediate, although it will not be in full force.

By analyzing the events of the last few days, we can see that rocket cells test-fired several upgraded Qassams (that simulate Grad rockets) from the Beit Lahia area at southern Ashkelon. The Qassams missed, but every strike was more accurate than the previous ones. Three days later, with some help from the Israeli media as well as their own observations, the Palestinians were able to come up with the right firing angle.

On Wednesday, they took one of the roughly 200 Grad rockets they possess out of the warehouse and fired it with lethal precision, based on the firing data of previous days, at the Ashkelon mall. These 122 millimeter Katyusha rockets, which are known as Grads, are not very accurate, yet the mall was a large enough target. And as opposed to the Qassams, whose warheads contain roughly seven kilos (16 pounds) of explosives, the Iranian Grad's warhead contains more than 20 kilos (44 pounds) of industrial explosives, which enabled it to penetrate the mall's thick walls and cement ceiling. The Rocket's heavy weight and its relatively long flight time further boosted its penetration capability.

This isn't the first time Hamas welcomes foreign leaders, both Western and Arab, with rocket barrages. This was the case every time we saw a summit meeting in Sharm el-Sheikh. This is what Hizbullah used to do in the 1990s - typical practice for radical Islamic groups, particularly in relation to regional meetings with the participation of the president of the United States, the "Great Satan."

The objective of Wednesday's attack, as was the case in the past, was to undertake a strategic provocation that conveys the message that Hamas is not scared and is in fact the true power in the region - and hence, any regional move that does not take Hamas into account is doomed for failure, because the group has the power to light up the area.

Another objective was to steal the show and direct all attention at Hamas and its demands. Such attack not only scores prestige points for Hamas on the Palestinian street, but also wins it special appreciation from its patron, Iran. Through the Iranian Grad fired by Hamas, Iran makes it clear to the Americans that they will have to take Tehran into consideration with any step they take in any corner of the Middle East

Hamas' message: Truce on our terms
 
The attack on Ashkelon had another objective: Forcing Israel to agree to a ceasefire in line with all the terms agreed upon by Hamas and Egypt. The rocket strike was Hamas' response, on the ground, to the terms presented by Israel Monday night to Egyptian mediator Omar Suleiman. Hamas is unwilling to tie the release of Gilad Shalit to the lull agreement and is unwilling to obligate to end arms smuggling and the process of building its military strength.

If Israel is unwilling to accept Hamas' terms, it will see Grad attacks on Ashkelon, Hamas says, and we'll see who breaks first. Seemingly this is a gamble on the part of Hamas, which fears a large-scale Israeli operation. However, the organization estimates, and apparently rightfully so, that it can push Israel a bit more before it truly decides to realize its threat and embark on a major Gaza operation.

Hamas estimates that as long as President Bush and other leaders are in Israel, the Israeli government would not respond with a fierce military operation. Israel faces a complicated dilemma: Should the IDF embark on a wide-scale Gaza operation at this time, the international show of support could turn into a footnote on the media front. Israel needs this show of support mostly in order to enlist international support for the struggle against Iranian nukes. On the other hand, should Israel not respond immediately, Hamas may continue to launch lethal rockets for a few more days at least. That is, strategic long-term considerations clash with immediate tactical considerations.

Israel still wishes to secure a lull in line with the terms it presented, and therefore it will escalate its operations gradually to press Hamas. In the next few days we will likely see intensive maneuvers from the air and on the ground against Hamas' leadership and the group's infrastructure. Southern residents should take this into account - they must assume that a Qassam or mortar shell barrage could land at any moment in the coming days and conduct themselves accordingly.

De 3 nee's van Hamas

Afzweren van geweld, erkennen van Israël (liefst als Joodse staat!), en accepteren van eerdere verdragen van de PA met Israël, dat zijn de 3 eisen die aan Hamas zijn gesteld om de boycot op te heffen en hen als gesprekspartner te accepteren. Zoals de Arabische Liga in 1967 in Kartoem, is het antwoord van Hamas nu 3 keer nee.
 
 
Israël is verdoemd en de Palestijnen zullen al hun rechten herwinnen, inclusief het zogenaamde 'recht op terugkeer'. Hamas leider Maghmoud Zahar drukte zich poëtisch uit bij de herdenking van de 'Nakba', de catastrofe die de stichting van Israël volgens de Palestijnen was:
 
"We will not surrender to cheap blackmail regardless of the consequences. We will protect the land with our bare bodies because we are its indigenous inhabitants who will serve it and water it with our blood."
 
Wordt het misschien zo zoetjes aan eens tijd om deze mensen te zien als wat ze zijn, en niet te beschouwen als 'vrijheidsstrijders' die Israël wel zullen erkennen, van geweld afzien en zich neerleggen bij een compromis als Israël maar meer toegeeft?
 
 
Wouter & Ratna
------------------------
 
Zahhar and Al-Hindi: "No recognition of Israel; no giving up the right of return"
 
http://www. maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=29279
Date: 14 / 05 / 2008  Time:  15:38
[Ma'anImages]
Gaza - Ma'an – Senior Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahhar demanded the recognition of the right of return for Palestinian refugees, and the importance of 'not recognizing Israel' in light of the dispossession of the Palestinians.

Zahhar was speaking at the beginning of a conference marking the 60th year of Palestinian exile in Gaza. He said that Israel "is doomed" and that Palestinians will win their rights, including the right to return, through resistance.

Zahhar harshly criticized US President George Bush's visit to Israel this week to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the county's founding.

He said that Palestinian land "is not for sale" and the right of return is sacred. He also said that the resistance will erase the Israeli occupation as it had done to other empires.

Zahhar called on the Arab states to support the Palestinian people.

With regard to Palestinian prisoners, Zahhar said in a message, "We will not surrender to cheap blackmail regardless of the consequences. We will protect the land with our bare bodies because we are its indigenous inhabitants who will serve it and water it with our blood."

The Vice President of the Gaza conference, Islamic Jihad leader Muhammad Al-Hindi said, "The Palestinian people will not beg for a ceasefire and they can bear double suffering than the occupation can. This heavily-armed entity can't endure a small confrontation with resistance fighters."

Commenting on Bush's visit to Israel, Al-Hindi said, "At these moments, the one responsible for killing thousands of innocent children in Iraq and Afghanistan came to celebrate the sixtieth anniversary of the establishment of Israel. This is the anniversary of killing and displacing the Palestinian people and planting that entity in the heart of the Arab nation over the debris of Palestine and its people."

He added, "The US president will stand up in the Israeli Knesset tomorrow to distribute awards and pledges. He will deny the right of return of Palestinian refugees. He will reject removal of Israeli settlements from the West Bank. He will talk about Jerusalem as the united capital of Israeli occupation."
 

Inwoner Abu Gosh: "De Britten wilden dat wij elkaar zouden uitmoorden"

Tussen alle verhalen over de oorlog tussen de Joden en de Palestijnse Arabieren in 1948, is hier een opvallend ander verhaal, van de 74-jarige Israëlische Arabier Said Jabr.
 
Helaas is het op weinig plaatsen zo verlopen...
 
Wouter
____________

Times Online - May 10, 2008

'The British wanted us to kill each other'
 
 
The old British Army base, a small sandstone fort, stands abandoned on a hill in Abu Ghosh, an Arab village just southwest of Jerusalem. Said Jabr was 14 when the British pulled out.
 
"It was on the 14th or 15th of May. I remember exactly that the British commander came to Ali Saleh, the village mukhtar (elder), and said they were going to leave and warned us to be ready," he recalled from his family home in Abu Ghosh. "Thirty-five armed villagers walked into the base to take command. But the British commander went at the same time to the kibbutz and told them the same thing.
 
"The British left one tank in front of the army base. Then a few tanks driven by the Haganah (the fledgling Jewish army) drove up and surrounded the army base. But we had great relations with the local kibbutzim – we believe in friendship and protecting a neighbour's property, no matter who they are – and the leaders of the kibbutzim. . . came to the village. They met the mukhtar, drank coffee and reached an agreement that the villagers would leave the base and the Haganah would take over. The British commander was waiting in the remaining tank to see what would happen. He saw the Abu Ghosh villagers leaving the base and shaking hands with the Haganah members, and he said, 'F****** Arabs'. Our impression was that he wanted us to kill each other. Thank God the people from both sides resolved the issue peacefully."
 
Mr Jabr proudly displays the Hebrew shield he was awarded by the kibbutz. It shows two hands shaking – a token of thanks and friendship.