Amnesty Internatonal partijdig in rapport Gaza Oorlog

 

Ik lees zelden rapporten, dus ik weet niet hoe Amnesty International gewoon is zijn rapporten op te stellen, maar "Operation 'Cast Lead': 22 Days of Death and Destruction" is geen objectief rapport, maar een onverbloemde aanklacht tegen Israel.

 

De titel zegt alles al: Israel heeft 22 dagen dood en vernieling gezaaid, volgens het rapport met schijnbare minachting voor mensenlevens en zeker met minachting van het internationale recht. De opstellers zijn naar Gaza geweest, duidelijk met een oordeel vooraf over de dood en vernielingen daar en wie daarvoor de schuld draagt. Men heeft de Palestijnse getuigenissen braaf opgetekend, de puinhopen gefotografeerd en de spreekwoordelijke Jood aan het kruis genageld. Een 'kokervisie' heet dat in opsporingstermen.

 

Neem die UNRWA school waarbij in de buurt tientallen doden vielen: volgens Amnesty werden géén raketten afgevuurd door Hamas uit de omgeving daarvan ("there had been no Palestinian fire from a yard adjacent to the school"). Toch vindt een klootje als ik al binnen 10 minuten berichten van getuigen die het tegendeel zeggen:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1231167272256&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/17/world/middleeast/17israel.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all

 

De opstellers van het rapport lijken maar 1 doel gehad te hebben: Barbertje moest hangen!

 

Wouter

 

============================

 

Amnesty Internatonal bias against Israel regarding Gaza

http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/07/amnesty-internatonal-bias-against.html

 

This letter makes a good point. Here are some additional resources regarding humanitarian issues in the Gaza campaign,

Israel's Operation "Cast Lead" – Legal Humanitarian Aspects

BBC Interview of Col Richard Kemp discussing IDF operations in Gaza

International Law and Military Operations in Practice (a new Richard Kemp video and transcript)

Prosecuting Hamas for War Crimes (Legal opinion)

Gaza victims describe how they were used by Hamas

Hamas war crimes in Gaza

 

============================

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/opinion/l09gaza.html

July 9, 2009

Letter

A Bias Against Israel

To the Editor

Amnesty International's report on the conflict in Gaza is fundamentally biased against Israel ("Report Accuses Israel and Hamas of War Crimes in Gaza," news article, July 3). Nothing illustrates this more starkly than when the report deals with the issue of Gaza civilians caught up in the conflict.

When assessing Israeli efforts to warn civilians of an impending attack, whether by telephone or by leaflet, the report says that all such warnings did was create panic because the civilians had nowhere to flee.

On the other hand, when the report looked at Hamas's placing military infrastructure in the heart of civilian areas, it minimized the effect by arguing that Hamas did not force people to stay in their homes so civilians could flee attacks.

In other words, Amnesty adjusted its version of the facts to suit its a priori assumptions that Israel was the main party responsible for civilian deaths.

In fact, in a complicated situation, Israel did all it could to avoid civilian casualties. The main violator of human rights was Hamas; its eight-year rocketing of Israeli civilians and its deliberate placing of its military in civilian buildings, homes, schools, hospitals and mosques were major violations of international law. One would barely know this from the Amnesty "investigation."

Kenneth Jacobson
Deputy National Director
Anti-Defamation League
New York, July 5, 2009