zaterdag 15 mei 2010

Enquete: haredi meerderheid bedreiging voor Israel

 
Ik vind de uitkomsten eigenlijk nog vrij gematigd, gezien de groeiende invloed van de haredim en het feit dat zij de staat wel veel geld kosten, maar zelf weinig bijdragen en ook voor het merendeel niet in dienst gaan. Het is echter duidelijk dat de verdeeldheid toeneemt, en het gevaar van meer religieuze dominantie lijkt reeël. Uit Jeruzalem trekken de seculieren al jarenlang weg uit onvrede met de dominante aanwezigheid van de ultra-ortodoxen.
Met een steeds groter percentage aan ultra ortodoxen is het niet langer te verkopen dat zij niet in dienst hoeven en niet hoeven te werken voor hun geld.
 
RP
------------


Poll: Secular public believes haredi majority endangers state
http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3885786,00.html
 
Gesher poll finds most seculars think state should withdraw benefits to ultra-Orthodox sector
 
Ynet
Published:  05.06.10, 13:37
 
 
A Ynet and Gesher poll has discovered that many secular members of Israel's population are concerned with predictions that the ultra-Orthodox sector will soon be a majority in Israel and believe this constitutes a major risk to the state's existence.
 
The haredim, their education, and their prevalence in the workforce are matters that have caught headlines recently.
 
The poll was conducted among 501 people – a sample of adult Jews living in Jewish cities in Israel.
 
The first question was, "What will you do if Israel becomes mainly ultra-Orthodox?" For 41% the answer was: "It would sadden me out of fear for Israel's existence", while 37% said they would be fine with it, and 12% said they would leave the country because they do not want to live in a "halachic state".
 
Those polled who define themselves as secular expressed more concern for a haredi majority, with 56% of them saying they would fear for Israel's existence. However 87% of religious and 92% of haredim were convinced that the secular minority would not suffer from an ultra-Orthodox majority.
 
Participants in the poll were then asked whether the state should attempt to prevent the demographic tilt. To this, 37% answered that all benefits to haredim should be withdrawn, 32% said nothing should be done because "whatever will be will be", 10% supported encouraging secular immigration, and 10% said they would be pleased with the change.
 
The results show that of the secular people polled, 50% would stop all benefits to haredim, while 52% of religious participants said they would take no action. Of the haredim polled, 75% said they would be pleased with the change.

The third question asked, "Which of the following proposals do you believe would better incorporate haredim into society?"

To this, 40% answered they should serve mandatory army service, 28% preferred national service, 21% recommended occupational training that would allow them to better incorporate into the workforce, 3% called for affirmative action on accepting haredim to jobs, and 4% said the state should not become involved.

The results showed that of the seculars polled, 47% believe mandatory IDF service would help haredim assimilate better, 37% of religious people believe occupational training would help, and 42% of the haredim want affirmative action.
 
Ilan Gael-Dor, general manager of Gesher, responded to the findings by saying, "It is clear to everyone that the haredim currently constitute a significant portion of Israeli society and the non-haredi population is concerned they will 'take over'.

"The poll proves that the Israeli public is open to accept the haredim, but at the same time believes they must take on a larger portion of the national responsibility, through army or national service. At Gesher we believe it is very important to extend the dialogue with the haredim and oppose slogans that only widen the gaps."

Arabische wapenwedloop dreiging voor Israel

 
De tijd dat Israel met gemak alle Arabische legers bij elkaar aan kon, is voorbij. De Arabische landen hebben hun legers gemoderniseerd en kopen op grote schaal modern wapentuig in. Wanneer de miljardensteun van de VS aan Israel weer eens wordt gehekeld, is het goed dit voor ogen te houden.
 
RP
----------
 

Arab arms race: What does it mean for Israel?

Arab regimes are investing heavily in defense industries as well as beefing up their armies. They are evidently motivated both by the decline of the United States, which can no longer be counted on as an ally and military force in their view, and by the constant muscle flexing of Iran.  This build up of armament quite a different proposition from purchases of foreign arms in the past. It gives these states the possibility of independent action, not tied to strings in Russia, the United States or European capitals. It will probably mean better assimilation and integration of weapons as well. For Israel, in the event of war, it can no longer be assumed that Arab armies are paper threats only. The numerical advantage will be turned into actual strength.  We need to give some thought to what happens if these increasingly impressive capabilities were to be used against Israel.
 
Ami Isseroff
==============
 
Robert Bailey

Wednesday, 12 May 2010 07:59 
 
Local arms manufacturing in the Middle East and North Africa region is set to grow. Robert Bailey outlines some of the projects and collaborations that are underway
 
Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) defence industries are becoming more self reliant as they shift from direct equipment purchases to local production. Where technology transfer has for more than two decades been an established part of headline-catching, multi billion dollar offset programmes, the focus now, for even the smaller countries, is to require technology transfer as a first step to developing their own armaments manufacturing capability.
 
Nevertheless, the MENA region is still a hugely lucrative market for Western arms manufacturers. Its spending on military equipment continues to be the highest of any region outside North America and Europe. Saudi Arabia's defence expenditure alone totalled more than $38 billion in 2008, ranking ninth in the world.
 
After maintaining a low profile for many decades, the UAE has emerged as one of the world's largest purchasers of advanced military equipment. Scarcely had the delivery of 60 of the latest Lockheed F-16 fighter aircraft been completed – to add to the 50 Mirage 2000 fighters acquired in 2008 – than the UAE authorities availed themselves of the Abu Dhabi defence exhibition, which was staged in early 2009, to order four giant Lockheed Martin C-17 and the smaller C-30 military transport aircraft, and jet fighter trainer aircraft from Italy's Alenia.
 
The federation is also negotiating a $9 billion package for Lockheed's terminal high-altitude air-defence system and Patriot air-defence missile systems. Three more Airbus A330 tanker aircraft are also slated to add to three already purchased and due for delivery in 2011.
 
Another relatively new armaments market is Algeria, which is pursuing a major modernisation programme. In the past two years, the growth in annual defence spending has more than trebled to 33 per cent. Potential suppliers have been courting Algeria's top brass since an arms embargo was lifted in 2005. These include the UK, whose defence minister visited Algiers in October for talks with President Bouteflika.
 
However, it was a sign of the times that the Anglo-Italian group AgustaWestland discovered, when negotiating the sale of an extra 100 helicopters to supplement a completed $600 million order, that the deal could well depend on agreeing to a large proportion of them being assembled locally.
 
Libya is another country that has emerged from pariah status to be wooed assiduously by arms suppliers. Since the lifting of the international arms embargo, several countries – notably the UK, France and Russia – have beaten a path to Tripoli to offer equipment and military training.
 
France is reportedly negotiating a $6.4 billion arms package, including the supply of Rafale fighter jets, which could hinge on offering some local production and assembly. However, the Libyans may be more inclined to stick with their traditional Russian suppliers. A number of contracts involving the supply of Sukhoi-30 and MiG 29 fighter aircraft, as well as helicopters and the modernisation of Russian-supplied tanks, were confirmed in October.
 
Russia's state armaments marketing organisation, Rosoboronexport Russia, is active in other Arab markets. It has offered to supply Lebanon with MiG 29 fighters to beef up its depleted air force, as well as air-defence missile systems and T90 main battle tanks. It is also working on $2 billion worth of contracts with Saudi Arabia for the sale of 150 helicopters, T90 main battle tanks and BMP infantry-fighting vehicles.
 
Retraining Iraq's Russian-equipped army has been a long and complicated process. However, with more than $8 billion of orders for US helicopters, tanks and armoured combat vehicles in hand, Iraq is well on the way to rebuilding its equipment inventory with American arms. Most of this materiel was financed with aid, but as oil revenues improve, Iraq could become a leading defence market in its own right.
 
Another important defence provision that relates particularly to Iraq is security services. G4S, formerly Group Four Securicor, has 40,000 employees working in the Middle East, a large proportion of them in Iraq where it has nine branches. The British security firm, Aegis, which processes and monitors all private security operations in Iraq, also has a large presence with 15 branches.
 
Although the US Fifth Fleet is headquartered in Bahrain, and many other navies regularly visit Gulf waters, the Gulf Cooperation Council is assuming much more responsibility for its own security; naval and air defences are being reinforced. The Sultanate of Oman has taken delivery of the first of three state-of-the-art 2,700-tonne Corvettes from the UK's Vosper Thorneycroft group, as part of a $715 million deal. Meanwhile, Bahrain's navy is reportedly seeking to buy three new frigates.
 
However, MENA countries are now looking to develop their own capabilities. Arms production was pioneered by Egypt, which built its industry on the back of the Arab Organisation for Industrialisation, an abortive attempt in the 1980s to create a pan-Arab military industrial complex. Egypt has relied heavily on US military assistance and now builds US-designed tanks and other military platforms.
 
Offset, where typically the supplier invests 35 per cent of the value of a defence project in a local industrial undertaking, was pioneered by Saudi Arabia with the launch, in 1984, of Boeing's Peace Shield programme, followed by British Aerospace's Yamamah programme. Now it is widely used as a stepping-stone to local production.
 
For example, the UAE's $817 million Baymunah naval programme involves the design, construction and outfitting of six Corvettes. The first ship was built by Constructions Mecaniques de Normandie in France; the remainder will be built by Abu Dhabi Shipbuilding (ADSB), which is 40 per cent owned by the Abu Dhabi government's investment agency Mubadala. ADSB is also providing the UAE navy with 12 missile-armed fast-attack craft and four maritime patrol aircraft. The shipyard also has an order for a troop-carrying ship from Oman.
 
Mubadala has also established a helicopter pilot training school in Al Ain and has strengthened the Federation's maintenance, repair and overhaul facilities by acquiring the Gulf Aircraft Maintenance Company, whose core business is servicing a variety of military aircraft, including the UAE's F-16s and Mirage 2000-9s, as well as military and civilian makes of helicopter. It is sinking $500 million into revamping and broadening the scope of the company, which has now become Abu Dhabi Aircraft Technologies.
 
It has invested in Al Yah Satellite Communications Company, which provides the federation's armed forces with a secure satellite communications system. The company's first-launch satellite is currently being built by Europe's EADS Astrium and Thales Alenia Space. Mubadala has also joined with the US company EDS Defence and Security, to create the Injazat Data Systems IT, an outsourcing company, to provide data security systems for the armed services.
 
Independent of Mubadala, Tawazum Holdings, an offshoot of Abu Dhabi's Offset Programme Bureau, owns Caracal International, a company that specialises in manufacturing and distributing small arms. Tawazum has also joined forces with Al Jaber Group and Germany's Rheinmetall Munitions Systems to build a munitions factory.
 
While a frontrunner in the development of a viable indigenous defence industry, the UAE faces strong regional competition. Jordan, similar to Egypt, is well on the way to building a national defence industry. A recent contract involved calls for 100 Turkish-designed armoured vehicles to be assembled locally. The King Abdullah 11 Design and Development Bureau is also carrying out additional upgrading work, in Amman, on US-made main battle tanks.
 
However, Saudi Arabia has embarked on the region's technically most ambitious programme: a plan to develop a fully-fledged aeronautics industry on the back of local assembly of the Eurofighter Typhoon. The first 24 of a 72-plane, $32.9 billion order are being delivered direct from the UK; the first two aircraft arrived in Taif last July. The remaining 48 are to be assembled by Alsalam Aircraft Company, in new factories being constructed in Riyadh. Another Saudi company, Advanced Electronics, is in talks with BAE Systems, the Eurofighter Typhoon's prime manufacturer, to produce components for the fighters.
 
Global Arab Network
 
================
Robert Bailey is Global Arab Network consulting editor and writer specialising in the Middle East. This article is published in partnership with the Middle East Association.
 

Wedergeboorte bloedsprookje op Anti-Israël manifestatie Brussel

 
In België gaat men nog een stuk verder dan hier wat betreft de hetze tegen Israel.
Men refereert wel heel direct aan het eeuwenoude christelijke bloedsprookje, met glazen die zogenaamd gevuld zijn met Palestijns bloed waar Israelische kolonisten met plezier van drinken. De aanleiding voor deze demonstratie is de vermeende betrokkenheid van de Belgische bank Dexia bij de bouw van woningen voor kolonisten op de Westoever. Dit is geen manifestatie van een klein groepje radikalen, maar zij werd gesteund door een breed scala aan organisaties waaronder politieke partijen en vakbonden. Zie voor een volledige lijst hieronder. Het is ronduit schandalig dat zij zich voor een dergelijke antisemitische vertoning lenen.
 
RP
--------
 

De wedergeboorte van het bloedsprookje op manifestatie te Brussel van 12 mei

14/05/2010 brabosh

"Ohhhh. Bravo. Pas d'argent au sang. A Israël. Ohhhhhh. (Applaudissements) J'aime le sang. Un petit verre de sang. J'aime le sang. Un petit verre de sang."

"Ohhhh. Bravo. Geen geld voor bloed. Aan Israël. Ohhhhhh. (Applaus) Ik hou van het bloed. Een klein glaasje bloed. Ik houd van bloed. Een klein glaasje bloed."

Bron: Philosémitisme blog van 13 mei 2010

Hallucinante beelden tijdens de Anti-Israëlische demonstratie in Brussel van afgelopen woensdag 12 mei 2010. Clowns die Dexia en de Israëlische 'bezetters' moeten verbeelden, dronken met zichtbaar genot van uit glazen die gevuld waren met het zgn. 'bloed van Palestijnen'. Joden die het bloed van moslims drinken – en vroeger de christenen – je waant je meteen terug in de middeleeuwen. Maar nee, het speelde zich amper twee dagen geleden af met de medewerking van maar liefst 75 Belgische organisaties!

Op slechts enkele stappen verwijderd van de Brusselse kathedraal Sint Goedele en Sint Michiel. Maar weinig mensen weten nog dat deze beroemde kathedraal ruim vijfhonderd jaar lang het schouwtoneel is geweest van de legende van het Sacrament van het Mirakel. Volgens de legende zouden in 1370 hosties op miraculeuze wijze beginnen bloeden zijn, nadat ze door de Brabantse Joden in de synagoge van Brussel met messteken waren doorboord. De relieken werden vereerd als het Sacrament van Mirakel. In mei 1370 werden een zestal joden uit Brussel en Leuven op de brandstapel terechtgesteld, beschuldigd van diefstal en profanatie [=heiligschennis] van het H. Sacrament. De joodse goederen werden verbeurd verklaard en van bij de aanvang geloof werd gehecht aan het mirakel van de bloedende hosties. Meer over die antisemitische legende op deze blog: Het (antisemitisch) geheim van de Brusselse Sint-Michiels en Sint-Goedele kathedraal.

Op de afbeelding: De geboorte van een [antisemitische] legende. Detail uit het glasraam in de rechterzijbeuk van de kathedraal. Dit glasraam werd in 1861 geschonken door de deken van Sint-Goedele, Louis Verhoustraten, in herinnering aan zijn ouders. Het glasraam werd gemaakt door de Brusselse glazenier J.B. Capronnier, in voorbereiding van de viering van de 500ste verjaardag in 1870 van Het Sacrament van Mirakel. Op het glasraam wordt afgebeeld hoe de Joden in 1370 in de Brusselse synagoge de H. Hostie ontwijdden door deze hosties met dolken te doorprikken waarna de hosties begonnen te bloeden. Dit wordt vanaf dan -en dat 500 jaar lang!- door de katholieken het 'Mirakel van het H. Sacrament' genoemd.

Die betoging werd met veel bombast aangekondigd als Manifestation nationale contre le financement de la colonisation israélienne par Dexia. Zoals bekend wordt de Belgische bank Dexia verweten dat het de bouw van Joodse woningen op de Westoever in Judea en Samaria financiert. Ondanks dat de Israëlische regering sinds november 2009 een bouwstop handhaaft, ging de boycot-Israëlmanifestatie gewoon door. Tenslotte gaat het voor de desbetreffende organisatoren helemaal niet om de nederzettingen maar om de feitelijke vernieting van de Joodse staat Israël. Wie dat laatste steeds voor ogen houdt, begrijpt meteen heel wat meer van het Israëlisch-Arabisch conflict en de actie van afgelopen woensdag.

De lijst van de deelnemende organisatoren – 75 in het totaal – waaronder ONG, vakbonden, politieke parijen, de Franstalige nationale omroep RTBF en andere media, waren allemaal present. Deelnemers aan deze activiteiten waren de grote Belgische vakbonden, politieke partijen waaronder de SP.a van Caroline Gennez en Dirk Vandermaelen, die op de lijst verkiezingslijst prijkt (de SP.A heeft nog steeds geen antwoord gegeven waarom zij op die lijstdeelnemers vermeld staan), uiteraard ook Groen! en Ecolo en talloze NGO's gesubsidieerd door de overheid in dienst van de anti-Israëlische Lobby.

Hieronder een impressie van de manifestatie

en enkele bloeddrinkende manifestanten

Organisatie: "Plateform 'Palestine occupée – Dexia impliquée'

'Israël koloniseert – Dexia financiert'

* COBI – Coördinatie Boycot Israël (initiateur-initiatiefnemer), Association Belgo-Palestinienne Wallonie-Bruxelles, ACV – Brussel-Halle-Vilvoorde, Algemene Centrale ABVV – Centrale Générale FGTB, Alliance for Freedom and Dignity (AFD), Artistes contre le Mur, Attac Vlaanderen, Attac Wallonie-Bruxelles, BBTK-SETCa, Brugs Palestina Comité, BRussells Tribunal, CNAPD – Coordination Nationale d'Action pour la Paix et la Démocratie, CODIP – Centrum voor Ontwikkeling, Documentatie en Informatie Palestijnen, Conseil Consultatief Nord-Sud-Ville de Nivelles, Comac, Comité de Solidarité avec le Peuple Palestinien de Braine-L'Alleud, Comité Verviers Palestine, Coordination des Associations pour une Paix Juste au Proche-Orient (PJPO) du Brabant Wallon – PJPO Ittre – PJPO Mazerine – PJPO Nivelles, Divers & Actief, ECOLO, Egalité, FGTB Charleroi/Sud-Hainaut, FOS – Socialistische Solidariteit, Friends of the Earth Vlaanderen en Brussel, Gemeentes /Communes: Chapelle-Lez-Herlaimont – Ciney – Ittre – Mouscron – Vielsalm – Viroinval, Geneeskunde voor het Volk – Schaerbeek, Génération Palestine, GROEN!, Groupe Palestine Santé, Initiatief Cuba Socialista (ICS), intal, intal-CDR regio Heist-op-den-Berg, Jong Groen!, Kif Kif, La Braise Culture asbl – Charleroi, LAP – Leuvense Actiegroep Palestina, LBC-NVK, LCR, LEF, Marianne Charleroi, Mouvement Chrétien pour la Paix, Mouvement Citoyen Palestine, Netwerk Vlaanderen, OWW: Hasselt – Heist-Goor – Hulshout vzw – Herk-de-Stad – Leuven – Overpelt, Pax Christi Charleroi, Plate-forme Charleroi-Palestine (22 associations), PTB-PVDA, Recht op Migratie, Recht op Terugkeer, Reseau Financement Alternatif asbl, SCI, Solidarité Socialiste, SP.A, Steungroep voor Rechtvaardigheid en Vrede in Guatemala, The Palestinian Community in Belgium, UCOS, 't Uilekot, Une Autre Gauche, UPJB, Vlaams Palestina Komitee, Vrede vzw, Vredesactie, Vrouwen in 't Zwart Leuven.

Het onbekende verleden van Sheikh Jarrah

 
Onbekend nieuws over het verleden van Sheikh Jarrah, de wijk die in het nieuws kwam omdat er Arabieren uit hun huizen werden gezet. Wat men er niet bij vermeldde, is dat dat gebeurde nadat zij de huur niet meer betaalden en dat de huizen van Joden waren geweest die daar in 1948 uit verjaagd zijn.
 
RP
--------------
 
To make things clear, Sheikh Jarrah was both a sub-district and a neighborhood ("quarter") of Jerusalem. The sub-district included the quarters of Sheikh Jarrah, Hayy el-Huseyni, Wadi el-Joz and Bab ez-Zahira, and the Jewish quarters of Shim'on Hatsadik and Nahalat Shim'on.

The part that attacked the Jews was the Sheikh Jarrah quarter.
The part that is now called "Sheikh Jarrah" that is in the news is actually the Jewish quarter of Shimon HaTzaddik.
 
 

Sheikh Jarrah in 1948

http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2010/05/sheikh-jarrah-in-1948.html

The Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood has been in the news a lot lately. What is hardly mentioned is that it was the epicenter of Arab attacks on Jews in 1948.

In fact, that area - where Jews lived as well as Muslims before 1948, in quarters known as Shimon HaTzadik and Nahalat Shimon - was the scene of many Arab attacks in 1948 on their neighboring Jews.

Arabs from Sheikh Jarrah started attacking their Jewish neighbors almost immediately after the UN Partition vote. This article is from January 12, 1948, where it mentions that attacks had been coming from that area for three weeks already:



For the rest of the month, the Palestine Post had almost daily articles about attacks originating from Sheikh Jarrah at neighboring Jews:
In February, the attacks continued, including attacks on convoys headed towards Hadassah Hospital:
In March, attacks on innocents escalated. This is from March 28th, and the death of a Jew was barely mentioned:
While the British promised to protect hospital convoys, they did not take their jobs too seriously as they were planning to evacuate in May. In mid-April came the climax of Arab attacks on Jews, one that should have been foreseen given all the previous attacks:


Nearly 80 medical workers and others were slaughtered - and the neighborhood that spilled so much blood was known quite well:


It is interesting that this history of that neighborhood is not mentioned as today's media wants to paint the Jews as the aggressors - by savagely purchasing houses with Zionist cash and violently using a respected legal system to evict people who haven't paid their rent for years.

This history of real violence and aggression from the Arabs of Sheikh Jarrah just doesn't fit that narrative.

UPDATE: To make things clear, Sheikh Jarrah was both a sub-district and a neighborhood ("quarter") of Jerusalem. The sub-district included the quarters of Sheikh Jarrah, Hayy el-Huseyni, Wadi el-Joz and Bab ez-Zahira, and the Jewish quarters of Shim'on Hatsadik and Nahalat Shim'on.

The part that attacked the Jews was the Sheikh Jarrah quarter. The part that is now called "Sheikh Jarrah" that is in the news is actually the Jewish quarter of Shimon HaTzaddik.
 

donderdag 13 mei 2010

PMW interview: "Jodenhaat is de Palestijnen aangeleerd"

 
Het volgende is opmerkelijk:
 
Actually, I have hope for a very specific reason. The Palestinians did not always hate Israelis, they were taught to hate. As recently as 1996 through 1999, following 28 years of Israeli administration of the West Bank and Gaza, the most important Palestinian pollster checked Palestinian attitudes on how they rated "democracy and human rights" in the Palestinian Authority, France, the US and Israel.

It turned out that, after 28 years of daily contact between Israelis and Palestinians, Israel received the best rating in the world with 78% of Palestinians giving Israel a "positive" rating in democracy and human rights. The US had only 65%, France 55% and the PA had 50% of Palestinians giving them positive ratings. The poll was done three more times in the next three years and Israel was always seen as the best in the world by Palestinians, with 77%, 75% and 65% giving Israel positive ratings in democracy and human rights.

So, open borders and contact between the Israelis and Palestinians created healthy attitudes and respect. It was the terror and hate education of the PA that ruined the trust. My hope is that peace education can turn back the clock. The same way the Palestinian Authority poisoned their people with hate education, they can rectify the situation with peace education.
 
Ondanks de fricties en de ongelijkheid tussen beide partijen, werd Israel zo positief gewaardeerd. Tot aan de eerste intifada was de levensstandaard in de bezette gebieden overigens flink gestegen, en hoger dan in de omringende Arabische staten. Toch heeft dat de eerste intifada niet kunnen voorkomen, en naast een einde aan de opruiing zoals PMW bepleit is ook een politieke oplossing van het conflict nodig, een einde aan de bezetting en de onduidelijke status van de Westoever en Gazastrook. Dat is echter pas mogelijk als er weer enig vertrouwen is en er een einde komt aan de opruiing en verheerlijking van geweld tegen Joden en Israel.
 
Have you found American government officials and the media generally open to PMW's message? How about elsewhere in the world - what kind of press response do you get?

We find government officials, Congress and MPs around the world very appreciative to receive the material on a regular basis. People whose job it is to know what is really going on in the international arena are happy to have this material. People are tired of opinions being expressed by "experts" and they welcome the opportunity to receive information that enables them to form opinions on their own with objective data.

In the last year, we have presented to the Foreign Affairs Committees of Congress and of Holland, and to MPs from Italy, Sweden, Norway, Canada, Switzerland, Australia, and others. Media likewise is very favorable because we hand over material and let the media see, hear, and pass it on in a way that others can make their own opinions.
 
Dit lijkt vooral een PR praatje gericht op het verwerven van donateurs, want de media en politiek in Europa staat voor deze boodschap voor zover ik het zie niet erg open. Nederland is bij lange na niet het ergste land qua anti-Israel sentimenten maar hier worden dergelijke organisaties compleet doodgezwegen. Alle aandacht gaat altijd naar 'mensenrechten' of 'vredes'organisaties zoals Betselem, Breaking the Silence, Human Rights Watch, Al Haq, die met name kritiek hebben op Israel en steevast met een eenzijdig verhaal aankomen. NGO monitor, MEMRI, UN Watch, Camera en PMW ben ik de afgelopen jaar geen enkele keer tegengekomen in de krant of op TV.
 
RP
 
Lees het hele interview op PMW: http://palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=157&doc_id=2247
-------------------------------------
 
 

Moslims verdeeld over optrekken naar Jeruzalem om Al Aqsa te verdedigen


Om toe te voegen aan de lijst absurde aantijgingen (waaronder racistische stoplichten, superratten, bestraling met kanker in checkpoints, het gebruik van bloed van Palestijnse kinderen voor het bakken van matzes, etc. etc.):
 
Tamimi even added a new accusation: the Jews are now using chemicals to eat away at the walls of the Al Aqsa mosque, causing it to disintegrate from the inside!
 
RP
-----------------
 

Al Azhar leader rejects PalArab sheikh call to visit J'lem

http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2010/05/al-azhar-leader-rejects-palarab-sheikh.html

Al Masry al-Youm reports that the habitually lying, inciting and Jew-hating Sheikh Tayser Tamimi of Jerusalem has called on Arab Muslim and Christian leaders to visit Jerusalem to combat nefarious Zionist plans to Judaize the Jewish capital city.

Tamimi even added a new accusation: the Jews are now using chemicals to eat away at the walls of the Al Aqsa mosque, causing it to disintegrate from the inside!

(I wonder who the collaborators are that painted the walls of the mosque with this caustic chemical.)

Anyway, Ahmed Al-Tayeb, new head of the prestigious Al Azhar university, rejected Tamimi's call out of hand:

I refuse to visit Jerusalem and the Aqsa Mosque at the moment and I call on Muslims not to visit and obtain an Israeli visa, because that means supporting Israeli occupation and the recognition of its legitimacy
 
The irony that an Egyptian sheikh is saying he knows what is better for Palestinian Arabs than the PalArabs themselves is seemingly lost.

Strijd om sloop illegale gebouwen in Oost-Jeruzalem voor het Hooggerechtshof


Zo makkelijk/moeilijk (doorstrepen wat niet van toepassing is na lezen van onderstaand artikel) is het in Israel om illegaal gebouwde Arabische huizen te vernielen. Los van de vraag of het terecht is dat de beste man geen vergunning kreeg voor een groter en een tweede huis, feit is dat hij (meermaals) welbewust de overeenkomst met de gemeente schond, maar dit in de afgelopen tien jaar niet tot afbraak van zijn huizen heeft geleid.
 
RP
------------

The Jerusalem Post
NGO petitions High Court over Silwan buildings
By DAN IZENBERG
13/05/2010 02:15
http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=175429


Regavim documents illegal Arab building in east J'lem.

The Regavim organization, which campaigns against Arab encroachment on what it calls the "national lands," recently petitioned the High Court of Justice against the government and Jerusalem municipal authorities demanding that it implement demolition orders against two illegally built Palestinian apartment buildings in Silwan.

The buildings were constructed by Ahmed Sheikh on a plot of land that he owns, not far from the seven-story illegally built Beit Yehonatan, which, according to a court order, is to be sealed up and its Jewish occupants evacuated.

One of the reasons Regavim filed the petition was to give credence to the contention of defenders of Beit Yehonatan, who claim that the Palestinians have built dozens of illegal structures in Silwan without measures being taken against them.

They say the Israeli legal authorities, particularly State Attorney Moshe Lador, former attorney-general Menahem Mazuz and Jerusalem legal adviser Yossi Havilio, are discriminating against Beit Yehonatan by insisting that the city execute the court order against it, while allegedly ignoring similar orders against illegal Palestinian construction.

Leaving politics and ideology aside, the Regavim petition is a disturbing document, because it demonstrates that it was possible to build two buildings of six and seven stories without a permit and despite demolition orders, under the very noses of the municipal authorities and the courts, which were aware of the illegal construction from almost the very beginning.

The following is a chronological outline of how this happened:

September 21, 2000: The Jerusalem Planning and Building Committee gives Sheikh a permit to build one two-story structure, of 218 sq.m., on a plot of land that he owned in Silwan.

May 10, 2001: The authorities issue stop-work and demolition orders after discovering that Sheikh has laid the foundations for one building and constructed a two-story frame of a second building.

June 7, 2001: Sheikh files a request to cancel the demolition order. He denies that the foundations are for another building. The municipality agrees to postpone execution of the order pending a hearing.

June 19, 2001: The municipality agrees to postpone the demolition order for one month, in return for a promise that Sheikh will stop building.

July 12, 2001: The Local Affairs Court extends the postponement for four more months, following an agreement reached between the Sheikh and the authorities.

Unspecified date: The municipality discovers that Sheikh has violated the agreement and continued building. Its request to the court to advance the demolition date is accepted. Sheikh appeals to Jerusalem District Court. The court rules that the countdown for the demolition will begin on January 1, 2002.

December 31, 2001: Sheikh requests another postponement of demolition order. On March 24, 2002 and on May 15, 2002, he petitions to cancel demolition order altogether.

Unspecified date: Sheikh's petitions are denied. He appeals to the Jerusalem District Court. The court refers the matter back to the Local Affairs Court.

November 3, 2002: The Local Affairs Court rejects Sheikh's petition and orders the demolition to be executed within 30 days of December 10, 2002.

Unspecified date: Sheikh appeals Local Affairs Court decision. Jerusalem District Court rejects his appeal but gives him 30 days from February 20, 2003 for demolition.
While all these legal maneuverings were going on, the two buildings were completed and occupied.

In 2004, the state filed criminal charges against Sheikh. On November 11, 2006, he was sentenced to eight months in jail and fined NIS 2,467,800. The court also ordered the municipality to destroy the building, but set the deadline for September 1, 2007.

Sheikh fled the country. On June 20, 2007, one of the occupants petitioned the Local Affairs Court to postpone the demolition. The court postponed the execution of the order until July 5, 2008. The state appealed the decision to Jerusalem District Court, which cancelled the lower court's postponement.

On January 14, 2008, Sheikh himself filed a request to postpone the demolition. The Local Affairs Court agreed to the request and set the deadline for the demolition for May 15, 2009.

Once again the state appealed the decision and once again, the Jerusalem District Court upheld the appeal. Sheikh appealed the district court decision to the Supreme Court, which turned him down.

In its summation of this incredible saga, which has lasted more than 10 years, Regavim attorney Amir Fisher wrote, "Despite the especially grave circumstances of this affair, and despite the enormous resources invested by state authorities in general, and the municipality in particular, to obtain the demolition orders against the buildings that are the subject of this petition, to defend the orders in a host of courts, to conduct a lengthy criminal action against [Sheikh] and obtain a conviction, the government and municipal officials have refrained up until now from carrying out their fundamental duty to demolish the illegal building in accordance with the final court ruling."

Israel verliest de strijd voor Joods Oost-Jeruzalem

 
Gisteren was het Jeruzalem dag. Dan viert Israel de eenheid van Jeruzalem na de Zesdaagse oorlog met allerhande festiviteiten in de stad. Politici houden ronkende speeches over het ondeelbare Jeruzalem als eeuwige hoofdstad en in diverse artikelen wordt de heiligheid van Jeruzalem voor het Jodendom benadrukt, met verwijzing naar de 600 keer dat Jeruzalem in de Bijbel wordt genoemd en foto's van biddende Joden bij de Klaagmuur. Volgens Ami Isseroff missen dergelijke speeches en artikelen echter de kern van het belang van Jeruzalem voor Israel, en is Israel de strijd om Jeruzalem aan het verliezen. Een 'thought provoking' artikel:

The statistics are grim. More people leave Jerusalem than settle in it each year. The future is black, literally. In Jerusalem over 60% of the Jewish elementary school students is Haredi, more than twice their representation in the adult Jewish population of Jerusalem. The Zionist will to settle the land is not thwarted by Hamas rockets, by Palestinian suicide bombers or by threats of international ostracism. But Zionism seems to be helpless against the black-coated anti-Zionist Jewish religious fanatics. Yet the government has done nothing to deal with this growing problem. Actually, the government has done something. The government subsidizes Haredim and exempts them from military service and pays for their education network and their Yeshiva studies. Zionism is not just sawing off the branch on which it is perched. We don't do things by half-measures. We are doing a thorough job. We have set fire to the whole tree. But this is only one aspect of the failure of Zionism to back the Jewish claim to Jerusalem.

When the PLO organized campaigns to eject Israeli police and social services from East Jerusalem, we acquiesced. Personnel could not enter because their vehicles were stoned and mobbed, telephone linemen were murdered. Services of all kinds disappeared, so that the Palestinian Authority can now claim that Israel doesn't exercise its sovereignty in those places. Arab medical emergencies are often serviced by the Palestinian Red Crescent.

We fail to explain to the world that Jewish East Jerusalem had a large Jewish community until it was intimidated by Arab pogroms in 1921, 1929 and the 1930s, and then the remainder was ethnically cleansed by the Jordanian Legion in 1948. Having brutally expelled the Jews, the Arabs, with no sense of irony, insist that East Jerusalem is "Arab East Jerusalem." That period, when East Jerusalem was "Jew free," which lasted only 19 years, has somehow been turned into an ancient and hallowed tradition in the eyes of the press and the world.

 
 
RP
-------------
 

Verschil tussen terroristen en vrijheidsstrijders? (Hamas en Tsjetsjeense rebellen)


"Terrorists are terrorists, and Israel sees no difference whatsoever between Hamas terrorists acting against Israel and Chechen terrorists acting against Russia," continued the statement. "There is no difference between Khaled Mashaal and [slain Chechen separatist and guerrilla leader] Shamil Basayev. Israel has always sided with Russia in the fight against Chechen terror, so we expect similar backing when it comes to Hamas terror against Israel."
 
Er is wel een verschil: Hamas wil 'geheel Palestina' bevrijden, en pleit in haar handvest en in talloze speeches en interviews voor het doden van Joden, terwijl de Tsjetsjeense terroristen slechts voor de bevrijding van hun eigen land strijden, en ik neem aan dat ze ook niet alle Russen willen doden noch de Russen verantwoordelijk houden voor de beide wereldoorlogen. De hypocrisie van veel landen in de beoordeling van Hamas tegenover terroristen die hun eigen land bedreigen is opvallend.
 
RP
-----------

The Jerusalem Post
J'lem blasts Russia's Hamas stance
By JPOST.COM STAFF
12/05/2010 20:09
http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=175391


Comes after Medvedev suggests group should join peace process.


The Foreign Ministry on Wednesday fiercely rejected the suggestion of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to allow Hamas to join the peace process, comparing the organization to Chechen terrorists.

The ministry also expressed "deep disappointment" in Tuesday's meeting between Medvedev and Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal in Damascus.

"Hamas is a terror organization for all intents and purposes, and has the declared goal of annihilating the State of Israel," read a Foreign Ministry statement. "Hamas operatives are responsible for the murder of hundreds of innocent civilians, including immigrants from the former Soviet Union and Russian nationals."

The ministry said that the "enlightened nations" must not categorize terrorists as good or bad in accordance with their geographical location.

"Terrorists are terrorists, and Israel sees no difference whatsoever between Hamas terrorists acting against Israel and Chechen terrorists acting against Russia," continued the statement. "There is no difference between Khaled Mashaal and [slain Chechen separatist and guerrilla leader] Shamil Basayev. Israel has always sided with Russia in the fight against Chechen terror, so we expect similar backing when it comes to Hamas terror against Israel."

Alan Dershowitz houdt kritische speech tegen linkse professoren Tel Aviv Iniversiteit


Een speech van Alan Dershowitz naar aanleiding van een eredoctoraat van de Universiteit van Tel Aviv heeft tot felle reacties geleid. Derschowitz bekritiseerde daarin de anti-Israel activiteiten van sommige vooraanstaande academici van deze universiteit, en riep studenten op om hun academische vrijheid te gebruiken om zich tegen dergelijke propaganda teweer te stellen. Hij wordt er nu van beschuldigd de vrijheid van meningsuiting van academici te willen inperken en studenten op te ruien. Het is opvallend dat academici die zelf geen moment onbenut laten om Israel te bekritiseren en zelfs meedoen aan boycotacties, zo'n moeite hebben met de vrijheid van meningsuiting van iemand die het met hen oneens is.
(Zie voor Dershowitz' tekst onder het Haaretz artikel.)
 
RP
---------------
 
TAU professors denounce Dershowitz for speech against left
Academics hit back after U.S. commentator slams university staff for backing boycotts against Israel.
By Or Kashti
 
 
Senior faculty members at Tel Aviv University have come out against remarks by Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz on Saturday in which he condemned Israeli university faculty who criticize Israel and have even supported an academic boycott of the country.

Dershowitz made the remarks, in which he also criticized academics who use their academic freedom and their Jewishness to chastise the Israeli government, at a ceremony awarding him an honorary doctorate at the university.

(Read the complete text of Dershowitz's speech here)

In a letter to the university's president, Joseph Klafter, a group of faculty members demanded that Tel Aviv University disassociate itself from Dershowitz's comments and "unequivocally defend the freedom of expression of all the members of the academic community."

They wrote: "The fact that Dershowitz mentioned the names of [university] lecturers and accused them of hurting students and harming the resilience of the State of Israel already borders on incitement."

The letter was initiated in the history department and within hours attracted the support of 80 faculty members.

Dershowitz, one of the most prominent pro-Israel advocates in the United States, spoke at the university on Saturday evening on behalf of this year's recipients of honorary degrees. But he stressed that the views he expressed were his own. Dershowitz said academic freedom not only meant freedom to criticize the establishment but also the right to defend the government, work with it and be a patriot.

He said students also have academic freedom and the right not to accept lecturers' classroom propaganda. Dershowitz's speech was met by enthusiastic applause.

In their protest letter, the faculty said that Dershowitz "has no evidence that anyone on the faculty has forced his views on students."

Tel Aviv University issued its own statement last night. "Prof. Dershowitz enjoyed the right to freedom of speech and to express his views. Klafter emphasizes that the university will continue to unequivocally defend freedom of expression of all the members of the academic community."

Dershowitz mentioned three faculty members - Rachel Giora of the linguistics department, Anat Matar of the philosophy department and Shlomo Sand of the history department.

Outgoing university rector Dan Levitan recently threatened to bring disciplinary charges against Matar after she took part in a conference in London - while classes were in recess at the university - dealing with the general and academic boycott of Israel. But no action has been taken.

Regarding Levitan's threatened action against Matar, the university said in its statement that "by virtue of his position, the university rector is entitled to approve or not approve vacation time for a member of the faculty during the academic year."

Dershowitz issued a separate statement to Haaretz. "Let the public judge whether the petition correctly characterizes my talk and whether it borders on 'incitement' or is itself an example of the kind of free speech many on the hard left would like to stifle," he wrote.

=============================

 
  • Published 05:40 12.05.10
  • Latest update 05:40 12.05.10
  • Full text of Alan Dershowitz's Tel Aviv speech

    'The burden should not only be on students to stand up to propagandizing professors who distort the truth in the name of extremist ideologies.'

    I have the double honor and pleasure of accepting an honorary doctorate from one of the world's great universities, and also of delivering an acceptance speech on behalf of the other distinguished recipients of the honorary degrees. I know I speak for all of the degree recipients when I praise the incredible accomplishments both of Israel in general over the past 62 years and of Tel Aviv University in particular over the past 57 years.

    No country in the history of the world has ever contributed more to humankind and accomplished more for its people in so brief a period of time as Israel has done since its relatively recent rebirth in 1948. As one of the youngest nations in the world, and one of the smallest, Israel exports more life saving medical technology per capita than any nation in the world, and ranks among the top 2 or 3 in absolute terms. The same can be said for environmental technology, internet technology and so many other areas of scientific innovation.

    (Fortunately for the rest of the world, but unfortunately for Israel, it also exports some of its best scientists and other academics to American and European universities, because the Israeli government does not fund its universities sufficiently.)

     At the center of these contributions to the world are Israel's great research universities. And at the center of these universities is Tel Aviv. Barely half a century old, Tel Aviv University has surpassed most of Europe's ancient institutions of learning and is now the equal of virtually all. The publications, awards and recognition of its faculty rival the best faculties in the world. I am tempted to say that Tel Aviv has become the Harvard of the Middle East, but then I would not be speaking for the rest of my fellow degree recipients who might not regard Harvard as the singular measure of excellence. Instead I will say that Harvard aspires to become the Tel Aviv University of America. Hyperbole aside, I can think of no university in the world that has achieved so much in so short a period of time as has the great university that has honored us tonight. Yasher Koach.

    Looking at Israel's accomplishments over 62 years and Tel Aviv University's over 57 years, it would seem to suggest that Israel and its premier research universities have developed in tandem and with symbiosis. And to some degree they have. Israel's research universities have contributed immeasurably to the defense of Israel by the development of technological advances that support the mission of the IDF. And as Dan Senor and Saul Singer have brilliantly demonstrated in their remarkable book Start Up Nation, the IDF has paid back its debt to Israel's universities multifold. The IDF has helped train and prepare many of Israel's most innovative young women and men for the university and then for their roles in research and technology. The Israeli military plays more than a critical role in defending the citizens of the Jewish state. It also plays an important social, scientific and psychological role in preparing its young citizens for the challenging task of being Israelis in a difficult world.

    All this is well and good. There is no reason why the state and its universities must have as high a wall of separation, as should the synagogue, the church, the mosque and the state. But the university must play an important role in the informal system of checks and balances that is so essential to the health of the democracy. We all learn in school that the judicial, legislative and executive branches of government must check and balance each other. But other non state institutions must participate in this important system of checks and balances as well. These checking institutions include the academy, the media, religious institutions and NGOs. The academy should not become too cozy with, or too reliant on the government. Great research universities must insist on independence from government and on the exercise of academic freedom.

    Academic freedom requires that professors be free to challenge governmental policies, government officials and the status quo. Israel boasts that the highest level of academic freedom in the world today—if not in theory, then certainly in practice. I emphasize practice, because few nations in the world—even those who in theory proclaim strict adherence to academic freedom—confront on a daily basis kind of academic dissent experienced in Israel. Israeli academics regularly and falsely compare their nation to the tyrannical regime that murdered 6 million Jews. Academic dissenters regularly and freely call on other academic institutions around the world to boycott the very Israeli universities which grant them academic freedom. Professors from this university are currently in Boston demanding the shutting down of an exhibit in the Boston Museum of Science featuring Israeli scientific and technological advances in medicine, clean energy and other contributors to humanity. [Matar, Giora]

    Israeli academics are free to challenge not only the legitimacy of the Jewish state but even, as one professor at this university has done, the authenticity of the Jewish people. Israeli academics are free to distort the truth, construct false analogies and teach their students theories akin to the earth being flat—and they do so with relish and with the shield of academic freedom. So long as these professors do not violate the rules of the academy, they have the precious right to be wrong, because we have learned the lesson of history that no one institution has a monopoly on truth and that the never ending search for truth requires, to quote the title of one of Israel's founders autobiography, "trial and error." The answer to falsehood is not censorship; it is truth. The answer to bad ideas is not firing the teacher; but articulating better ideas which prevail in the marketplace. The academic freedom of the faculty is central to the mission of the university.

    But academic freedom is not the province of the hard left alone. Academic freedom includes the right to agree with the government, to defend the government and to work for the government. Some of the same hard leftists who demand academic freedom for themselves and their ideological colleagues were among the leaders of those seeking to deny academic freedom to a distinguished law professor who had worked for the military advocate general and whose views they disagreed with. To its credit, Tel Aviv University rejected this attempt to limit academic freedom to those who criticized the government. As Professor Shlomo Avineri, no right-winger, put it:

    "The attempt to 'protect' those who belong to the left while employing McCarthy-style methods against those associated with the right is nothing but hypocrisy, which has no place in academia."

    Rules of academic freedom for professors must be neutral, applicable equally to right and left. Free speech for me but not for thee is the beginning of the road to tyranny.

    Nor does academic freedom belong to the professor alone. As Amnon Rubenstein has brilliantly argued, academic freedom belongs to the student as well as the teacher. He has pointed out that Article 5 of the Student's Rights Law guarantees every student "the freedom to express his [or her] views and opinions as the contents of the syllabus and the values incorporated therein." The right of the student's academic freedom, however, goes well beyond this law. It includes the right not to be propagandized in the classroom by teachers who seek to impose their ideology on students. It includes the right of the student to express opinions contrary to those presented by the teacher without fear of being graded down and without fear of being denied recommendations or job opportunities. Indeed, any professor who punishes a student for not agreeing with his controversial opinion is guilty of academic harassment, which is a variant on what we all would agree is an academic violation, namely sexual harassment. No teacher is permitted to threaten a student with lower grades or poorer recommendations if the student refuses to consent to sexual contact. Nor should any professor be permitted to threaten lower grades or recommendations if a student refuses to agree with a teacher's ideology. Students are the consumers of the university and consumers have rights that, if they don't trump those of the producer, are at least equal to them in the context of controversial ideas.

    In their book Start Up Nation, Senor and Singer make a strong case that Israel's innovative excellence is in part of function of its non-hierarchical military structure: A young 19 year old kid straight out of high school is encouraged to talk back to an officer if he or she thinks they have a better idea. Competition in the marketplace of ideas is encouraged in the IDF. It must also be encouraged in the academy where the right of a student to speak up and express controversial ideas is crucial. It is true that not all ideas are created equal and that those of the experienced professor may be better than those of the novice student, but the ultimate judge must be the open marketplace of ideas and not the raw power of the grader or recommender to impose his or her ideology. [tell Joel Pollack story]

    But most universities, not only in Israel, but throughout the Western world, the loudest and shrillest voices most often come from the extremes. Today it is the hard left. Yesterday it was the hard right. The burden should not only be on students to stand up to propagandizing professors who distort the truth in the name of extremist ideologies. The burden must be shared by professors as well, especially those who disagree with the extreme views. The other side of the coin of academic freedom is academic responsibility. It is the responsibility of reasonable and moderate professors to speak out against extremist views, whether of the hard right of hard left. The silent center must not remain silent just because extremists are more opinionated and more willing to express their views. Moderates don't get a pass. They too have an obligation to speak out, not in the classroom but in appropriate forums outside of the classroom where different rules govern. Students deserve the public support of faculty members who quietly agree with them, especially when they feel vulnerable to the power of extremist faculty who believe that their unbalanced views represent the sole truth. Great universities have the right to expect their professors to contribute to the market place of ideas when irresponsible extremists try to hijack the university's hard-earned brand and misuse it to promote their own ideologies.

    So let us join together in celebrating a great university which was born in conflict, came of age in conflict and will continue in conflict. What else could be expected of an innovative house of learning in the Jewish state. Conflict, after all, is as old as Abraham's argument with God, Jacob's wrestling match with the angel, the Talmud's insistence on preserving dissenting opinions and the tradition of Jewish jokes about two Jews, three opinions. A university without conflict may be suitable for China, Iran or the former Soviet Union. But it could never find a home in Israel. Conflict, while uncomfortable, is inevitable in a vibrant democracy.

     It is particularly inevitable in a vibrant Jewish democracy. To be Jewish is to be uncomfortable, to be unable to breathe a sigh of relief and declare that we can relax. Tension and conflict seems to be our destiny. It is also the road to learning, progress and innovation.

    The alternatives to conflict are stagnation, certainty and censorship, which have no place in a university. So let conflict continue, so long as no voices are silenced, all points of view valued, and the marketplace of ideas remains open. I am confident that moral clarity will trump hypocrisy, common sense will prevail over political correctness, and the process of searching for truth will be encouraged. Israel will survive its dissenters, as will this great university [Sh'ma story]. While there will always be conflict, we all here today hope and expect that the state of Israel and the university of Tel Aviv will go from strength to strength.

     

    Iran verkozen tot lid VN vrouwenrechtencommissie?


    In de serie: wat kan de VN nog méér doen om haar geloofwaardigheid volledig te verliezen?
    Komt er ooit een einde aan het totaal absurde Iraanse gedrag, waarin de duivel zich als engel voordoet, leugen waarheid wordt, haat liefde, en Achmadinejad weldra naar de hemel zal opstijgen als de Grote Redder der Mensheid?
     
    RP
    -------------
     
    http://joodsactueel.be/2010/05/04/iran-verkozen-tot-lid-vn-vrouwenrechtencommissie/

    Iran verkozen tot lid VN vrouwenrechtencommissie

    Dinsdag 4 Mei 2010 17:15

    Iran werd vorige week verkozen om deel uit te maken van de VN vrouwenrechtencommissie, dat melden FoxNews en de Teheran Times. Iran zou naar verluidt als één van de eerste punten de schending van de rechten van Arabische vrouwen in Israël willen aankaarten. Om welke schendingen het zou gaan is nog niet duidelijk.

    Natuurlijk horen we geen woord over de executies en publieke stenigingen van overspelige vrouwen en andere vervolgde minderheden in het land van de Ayatollahs. In het verleden werden ook vrouwen die zich uitspraken voor gelijke rechten opgepakt terwijl vorige week bekend raakte dat zonnebankgebruinde vrouwen gestraft zouden worden.

    Dissidente Iraniërs klaagden het absurde nieuws aan via een petitie op hun website hier.

     

    Palestijnse Autoriteit roept Joden in Israel op te vertrekken

     
     
    "I'm from Jaffa, I'm from Haifa, I'm from Acre, I'm from Nazareth, I'm from Gimzu, I'm from Zakariya, I'm from Ein Kerem. (All are cities and towns in Israel, - Ed.) Where are you [Israelis] from? Where are you from?
    Of course, you're from Ukraine; of course, you're from Germany, from Poland, from Russia, from Ethiopia, the Falasha (a pejorative term for Ethiopian Jews, Ed.) Why have you stolen my homeland and taken my place? Please, I ask of you, return to your original homeland, so that I can return to my original homeland. This is my homeland; go back to your homeland!" 
     
    Dit werd vergezeld van een afbeelding waarop geheel Israel met een Palestijnse vlag erover werd afgebeeld. Tot slot werd het volgende tegen Arabische kinderen in Israel gezegd:
     
    "Dear [Israeli Arab] children: We [the PA TV children's program] will definitely always remain in contact with you... this program is definitely yours too, just as it belongs to every Palestinian child, since you are part of occupied Palestine." Click to view.
     
    Hoe zouden wij het vinden als de Marokkaanse staats tv Marokkanen in Nederland zou oproepen om Nederland niet te erkennen en zich in te zetten voor een islamitisch Nederland? Het is ondenkbaar, maar wat betreft de Arabieren in Israel is het blijkbaar normaal.
    Ondertussen blijft iedereen de Palestijnse Autoriteit zien als gematigd en compromisbereid. We geloven nou eenmaal graag in sprookjes.
     
    RP
    -------
     

    Archeologische vondsten 'Palestina' in Syrië en Turkije

     
    Nieuwe archeologische vondsten suggereren dat de oude Filistijnen - naar vermoed een zeevolk uit Kreta of omgeving, dat zich van daaruit in de kuststrook bij Gaza vestigde - veel meer gebieden controleerden dan tot dusver gedacht. Hun naam werd gevonden in hierogliefen in Turkije en Syrië.
    De Filistijnen hebben weinig van doen met de huidige Arabische Palestijnen: de Romeinen hernoemden rond het jaar 136 het land van Israël naar dit volk toen dat al eeuwen verdwenen was, en later werden de inwoners van het gebied weer naar het land "Palestijnen" genoemd.
     
    Wouter
    _____________

    The Jerusalem Post
    'Palestine existed in Syria, Turkey'
    By JPOST.COM STAFF
    11/05/2010 14:20


    New finds from dig shed light on 11th, 12th century BC dynasty.


    The great kingdom of 'Palestine' once existed within Syrian and Turkish boundaries, Professor J.P Dessel of the University of Tennessee claimed in a statement released on Tuesday.

    The professor, who is a member of the Tell Tayinat archeological digs in Turkey, and who presided at the Haifa University Ancient East Research Conference, asserted that the commonwealth was located between the cities of Aleppo, Hama and Antakya and the Turkish-Syrian border in the 12th and 11th centuries BC.

    The significance of this find, which was being discussed in a special meeting, is that the ancient Philistine empire was not limited to the lands of Canaan.

    Following the collapse of the Hittite dynasty in the 13th century BC, smaller states sprung up in areas that were previously under Hittite rule, one of which was Palestine. In his lecture, Dessel explained that this was concluded from new-found evidence which was unearthed in the Tell Tayinat excavations.

    Hittite hieroglyphics were found on the Antakya site reading "Palestine." Similar hieroglyphics were found in the cities of Aleppo and Hama.

    "This is a significant discovery which shows that the Philistines did not just hold land in Israel, but in Syria as well," Haifa University Professor Gershon Glil, the conference coordinator, said.

    woensdag 12 mei 2010

    Moeten Joden Holocaust herdenkingen boycotten vanwege economische banden Europa met Iran?


    Commentators, for example, in The Wall Street Journal Europe, have argued over the years that German Jews and non-Jews concerned about advancing the security of Israel and Diaspora Jewry should cease their participation in Holocaust memorial events in the Federal Republic.
    According to this line of reasoning, Germany has done little to end its massive economic relationship with Teheran (totaling roughly €4 billion in 2009, the largest in Europe). Germany also allows Iranian proxy Hizbullah, which has 900 active members in the country, to operate within its borders. All of this means that alarm bells should be ringing about Germany's sincerity in mourning dead Jews while it fails to protect living Jews.
     
    Ik liep er zelf een paar dagen geleden doorheen, en ben toen helemaal niet op dat idee gekomen. Ik vroeg me vooral af in hoeverre de maker had voorzien dat het (niet alleen door kinderen!) gebruikt zou worden om verstoppertje te spelen en alle kanten op te rennen, in plaats van je te bezinnen en iets van de beklemming te voelen die de Joden in Europa hebben gevoeld.
     
    Het informatiecentrum was, zoals alle informatievoorziening wat betreft het verleden in Duitsland, grondig, en het was mooi opgezet.
    Dit alles laat onverlet dat het niet deugt dat Duitsland goede handelsbetrekkingen onderhoudt met Iran, iets dat overigens ook geldt voor andere Europese landen.
     
    The Berlin Holocaust memorial has been shrouded in controversy because many consider it a memorial that best serves Germans interested in improving their country's reputation on the international stage and in a feel-good exercise in cleansing pangs of guilt about the crimes of the Shoah.
    During the discussions about the proposed memorial in the 1990s, a German diplomat told a reporter for the Der Spiegel newsweekly, "We need the memorial to present ourselves to the world, above all to the USA."
     
    Deze kritiek vind ik ongegrond. Hoe had zo'n monument er anders uit moeten zien? Als het klein en onopvallend was geweest was het natuurlijk ook niet goed geweest, en een teken dat men niet teveel aan het onaangename verleden herinnerd wil worden. Nu men er werk van heeft gemaakt deugt dat niet omdat nationale belangen voorop zouden staan. Tja. Ik vind juist dat Duitsland over het algemeen goed met zijn verleden omgaat, juist door er veel aandacht aan te besteden en informatie te verschaffen, en daarbij op geen enkele wijze zichzelf probeert vrij te pleiten. Vergelijk dat met de moeizame excuses die andere landen maken voor begane (oorlogs)misdaden. Men kan er de schuld voor deze grootste misdaad uit de geschiedenis niet mee wegnemen, maar wat kan dat wel?

    Het is een algemeen euvel dat verleden en heden tezeer als twee verschillende zaken worden gezien, en het buitenlandse beleid door andere zaken wordt bepaald dan de motieven van hen die proberen het verleden een plaats te geven.
     
    RP
    ---------------

    The Jerusalem Post
    Analysis: Boycott Berlin Holocaust memorial because of Iran?
    By BENJAMIN WEINTHAL, JPOST CORRESPONDENT IN BERL
    08/05/2010 22:48
    http://www.jpost.com/International/Article.aspx?id=175037


    Austrian Jewish community walks away from event in Vienna parliament.

    BERLIN – Ariel Muzicant, the head of Austria's Jewish community, on Wednesday became the first major European Jewish leader to boycott a Holocaust commemoration event, because of the pro-Iranian policies of the Austrian government.

    According to the Graz-based Kleine Zeitung daily, Muzicant said his decision to stay away from the annual Mauthausen concentration camp event held in the Austrian parliament constituted a "silent protest."

    Will the Austrian Jewish community's decision to not participate in the Mauthausen event affect Germany, where the five-year anniversary of the Berlin Holocaust memorial will be marked on Monday?

    Defending his boycott of the event in Vienna, Muzicant cited Austrian Foreign Minister Michael Spindelegger's cordial welcome of Iranian Foreign Minister Manoucher Mottaki, a key speaker at the infamous 2006 Teheran Holocaust-denial conference, in Vienna late last month; the flourishing Austrian-Iranian trade relationship; and the refusal of Austria's representatives to leave the UN General Assembly meeting last year during Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's anti-Semitic tirade against Israel.

    Commentators, for example, in The Wall Street Journal Europe, have argued over the years that German Jews and non-Jews concerned about advancing the security of Israel and Diaspora Jewry should cease their participation in Holocaust memorial events in the Federal Republic.

    According to this line of reasoning, Germany has done little to end its massive economic relationship with Teheran (totaling roughly €4 billion in 2009, the largest in Europe). Germany also allows Iranian proxy Hizbullah, which has 900 active members in the country, to operate within its borders. All of this means that alarm bells should be ringing about Germany's sincerity in mourning dead Jews while it fails to protect living Jews.

    Some saw hypocrisy when Uwe Neumärker, the director of the Holocaust memorial, criticized the idea of a pro-Israeli protest at the memorial site during the nascent phase of anti-Ahmadinejad activism in Germany. "The political co-option of the site is worrisome," Neumärker said in early 2007.

    While the number of visitors to Europe's largest Holocaust memorial – measured by the number of people visiting the Berlin site's Information Center – is increasing each year (from 456,500 in 2008 to 457,000 in 2009), Israelophobia and expressions of modern anti-Semitism are mushrooming in Western Europe, according to recent studies such as the report issued by Tel Aviv University's Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism and Racism in April.

    The Berlin Holocaust memorial has been shrouded in controversy because many consider it a memorial that best serves Germans interested in improving their country's reputation on the international stage and in a feel-good exercise in cleansing pangs of guilt about the crimes of the Shoah.

    During the discussions about the proposed memorial in the 1990s, a German diplomat told a reporter for the Der Spiegel newsweekly, "We need the memorial to present ourselves to the world, above all to the USA."

    Then-German chancellor Gerhard Schröder's statement in 1998 that the Holocaust memorial should be a place "where people like to go" also seemed to set the stage for a memorial devoted more to Germans than to the victims of the Holocaust.

    All of this helps to explain that the preoccupation with memorials in Germany and Austria is riddled with contradictions about their past and their current relations with Israel's No. 1 enemy, the Islamic Republic of Iran. Germany and Austria were the first European countries – in 1984 – to jump-start diplomatic relations with Iran, and remain two of the countries in Europe that are, according to insiders, blocking tough European Union sanctions against a US-designated terrorist organization – the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps.

    The Austrian Jewish community's decision to pull the plug on its attendance at a Holocaust memorial event might very well trigger a long-overdue debate about the disconnect between mourning the victims of Nazism and foreign policy toward Teheran, which has made aggressive anti-Semitism a cornerstone of its foreign relations. European Jewish leaders have bitterly complained, particularly in Germany, about the political inertia toward confronting Iran.

    European countries that boast about their Holocaust commemorations and exhibits, such as France, continue to supply the Iranians with gasoline and technology. French energy titan Total SA is still wedded to Iran, as is German engineering transnational The Linde Group.

    Muzicant's message appears to be that shows of penitence that fail to translate into crippling sanctions toward Iran, with its genocidal threats against a UN member state, the grave danger it poses for the West and its illegal nuclear program, are not grounded in reality.

    Enquete: Obama verliest bijna helft van Joodse stemmen in VS


    Als al die mensen volgens wie er een oppermachtige Joodse lobby is in de VS, gelijk hebben, zou Obama onmiddelijk zijn beleid aanpassen en zich harder opstellen naar de Palestijnen, Syrië en Iran, en stoppen met het eisen van eenzijdige concessies van Israel. Eigenlijk zou hij dat volgens de theorie van de oppermachtige Joodse lobby allang moeten hebben gedaan, aangezien zionisten het buitenlandse beleid van de VS zouden bepalen. De werkelijkheid is een andere, en terwijl de Joodse stem zeker een factor is, zijn er andere factoren en belangen die weleens zwaarder zouden kunnen wegen voor de VS, en zijn er bovendien tientallen lobbies actief, waarvan sommige duidelijk groter en machtiger dan de Joodse. Toch hoop ik dat Obama wel van deze cijfers schrikt, en hij een evenwichtiger koers zal varen wat betreft het Israelisch-Palestijns conflict.
     
    RP
    ------------

    Poll: Obama has Lost Almost Half of his US Jewish Support
    by Gil Ronen
    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/137449


    United States President Barack Obama has lost nearly half of his support among American Jews, a poll by the McLaughlin Group has shown.

    The US Jews polled were asked whether they would: (a) vote to re-elect Obama, or (b) consider voting for someone else. 42% said they would vote for Obama and 46%, a plurality, preferred the second answer. 12% said they did not know or refused to answer.   

    In the Presidential elections of 2008, 78% of Jewish voters, or close to 8 out of 10, chose Obama. The McLaughlin poll held nearly 18 months later, in April 2010, appears to show that support is down to around 4 out of 10. 
     
    The poll showed that key voter segments including Orthodox/Hassidic voters, Conservative voters, voters who have friends and family in Israel and those who have been to Israel, are all more likely to consider voting for someone other than Obama.

    Among Orthodox/Hassidic voters, 69% marked 'someone else' vs. 17% who marked 're-elect.' Among Conservative-affiliated voters the proportion was 50% to 38%. Among Reform Jews, a slim majority of 52% still supported Obama while 36% indicated they would consider someone else. Among Jews with family in Israel and those who had been to Israel, about 50% said they would consider someone else, while 41%-42% supported Obama.

    Fifty percent of the Jewish voters polled said they approved of the job Obama is doing handling US relations with Israel. Thirty-nine percent said they disapproved. "This rating is not good for a group of voters who are 59% Democratic to only 16% Republican," the poll's analysis noted.

    A majority of 52% said they disapproved of the idea of the Obama Administration supporting a plan to recognize a Palestinian state within two years. 62% said that if given a state, "the Palestinians would continue their campaign of terror to destroy Israel." Only 19% thought they would live peacefully with Israel.    

    As Obama loses support among members of the influential Jewish voter bloc, possible Republican candidate Sarah Palin seems to be doing her best to woo them to her camp. At Time Magazine's May 4 dinner honoring the '100 Most Influential People in the World,' she was sporting a US/Israel flag pin.
     
    (IsraelNationalNews.com)

    dinsdag 11 mei 2010

    Palestijnse Autoriteit waarschuwt Palestijnen om Israelische supermarkt te boycotten


    Op het moment dat de indirecte onderhandelingen tussen Israel en de Palestijnen na veel gedoe zijn hervat, zet de Palestijnse Autoriteit rigoreus een boycot door van alle Israelische producten en diensten. Dit is het antwoord op de vele Israelische concessies waaronder een onofficiële complete bouwstop inclusief Jeruzalem. Ging het in eerste instantie om producten uit de nederzettingen, nu wordt ook een willekeurige Israelische supermarktketen daarvan het doelwit.
     
    Thousands of Palestinians converge every day on the Rami Levy supermarkets at Sha'ar Binyamin and Mishor Adomim, the only two branches in the West Bank. The two stores also employ dozens of Palestinians.
     
    Abu Libdeh said in an interview with the local Al-Watan TV station that the PA knew the names of individuals and families who shop in the Rami Levy stores.
    He condemned the phenomenon of Palestinians buying goods at the Israeli supermarkets in the West Bank as a "big disgrace."

     
    Wat een grote schande is, is dat de Palestijnse Autoriteit, die zelf op vele niveaus met Israel zaken doet, arme Palestijnse burgers bedreigt omdat zij hun boodschappen bij een Israelische supermarkt halen. Ik zou zeggen: laat Palestijnen zelf bepalen waar ze hun spullen kopen en waar ze werken. Dat een en ander de sfeer aan het begin van de vredesbesprekingen geen goed doet, lijkt me ook duidelijk, en misschien dat de VS nu eindelijk de Palestijnen eens op deze absurde maatregel kunnen aanspreken, maar dat zal wel ijdele hoop zijn.
     
    RP
    -------------

    The Jerusalem Post
    PA warns Palestinian shoppers
    By KHALED ABU TOAMEH
    07/05/2010 02:40
    http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=174959



    Rami Levy shoppers, we know who you are, says economy minister.

    Palestinian Authority Economy Minister Hassan Abu Libdeh warned Palestinians on Thursday against shopping at Rami Levy supermarkets in the West Bank.

    Thousands of Palestinians converge every day on the Rami Levy supermarkets at Sha'ar Binyamin and Mishor Adomim, the only two branches in the West Bank. The two stores also employ dozens of Palestinians.

    This was the first threat of its kind issued by the PA against Palestinians who visited the Israeli supermarkets, which are named after their founder.

    Levy, who was born in a tin shack in Jerusalem's Nahlaot neighborhood in 1955, founded the company in 1976. He has never lived in a settlement.

    The supermarket chain has 16 branches all over the country.

    Abu Libdeh said in an interview with the local Al-Watan TV station that the PA knew the names of individuals and families who shop in the Rami Levy stores.

    He condemned the phenomenon of Palestinians buying goods at the Israeli supermarkets in the West Bank as a "big disgrace."

    Abu Libdeh said the PA was serious in implementing the decision to boycott settlement-made goods. Nevertheless, he denied that the boycott was politically motivated or had anything to do with the resumption of indirect negotiations between the PA and Israel.

    The boycott was intended to "cleanse" the Palestinian market of settlement products and boost Palestinians' confidence in their national products, he said.