dinsdag 1 september 2009

Abbas weigert vredesonderhandelingen tot er volledige bevriezing nederzettingen is

 
De houding van Abbas is net zo compromisloos als die van de kolonisten:
 
However, it was eventually decided that the meeting with Barak would go ahead as planned, and that the opportunity would be used to send an uncompromising message that there would be no negotiations on the evacuation of outpost without a lifting on the ban on settlement construction in the West Bank.
 
Als Abbas erop blijft staan dat Israel geen huis mag bouwen in de oude stad van Jeruzalem, dan kan alleen stevige druk van de VS het vredesproces weer op gang krijgen. Zolang de VS alleen Israel onder druk zetten, zal er aan de Palestijnse houding natuurlijk niks veranderen, integendeel, zij voelen zich gesterkt in hun 'standvastigheid'.
 
RP
--------------

Abbas: No peace talks without full settlement freeze
By Reuters
Last update - 15:34 31/08/2009
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1111369.html

 
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas will reject any U.S. invitation to resume peace talks with Israel unless Washington persuades Israel to freeze settlement activity, an aide said on Monday.

Nabil Shaath said only a full settlement freeze without exceptions or "loopholes" and an Israeli commitment to establishing a Palestinian state would be enough to bring Abbas back to the negotiating table.

Shaath told foreign correspondents in Ramallah the reaffirmed position of the central committee of Abbas's Fatah party was that a halt to Jewish settlement must be implemented throughout the West Bank and East Jerusalem and not be limited by "artificial" timeframes.

He said the only time limit Palestinians would accept was that the freeze could be temporary but must last until a final peace settlement was agreed on.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been negotiating with U.S. President Barack Obama's envoy, George Mitchell, on how far Israel might be able to secure exemptions from the settlement freeze that Obama has demanded.

Political sources have said such exemptions might include building in East Jerusalem, completing projects already under way, or the "natural growth" of existing settlements.

Shaath, who was re-elected in August to Fatah's central committee and is a former Palestinian prime minister and foreign minister, dismissed suggestions that Abbas would have little choice but to accept a return to negotiations if Obama agreed on a compromise over settlements.

Asked what the Palestinian leadership would say if Obama asked them to negotiate on the basis of a limited settlement freeze, Shaath said: "I would say, Mr. Obama, we love you ... but I am sorry this is not enough to bring us to the peace process."

Settler leaders: No outpost evacuation without compromise

Defense Minister Ehud Barak is scheduled to meet Monday afternoon with the leadership of the Yesha Council of Settlements to discuss the construction freeze and the evacuation of unauthorized outposts.

The head of the Yesha Council, Gershon Masika, announced earlier Monday that he would boycott the meeting in protest of the settlement freeze policy.

"The issue of outposts has nothing to do with security," he said.

Divisions within the settler council emerged on Sunday when members convened to prepare for the meeting with Barak.

On one side were members who claimed that the defense minister was playing with them and that it was prohibited to meet with him.

However, it was eventually decided that the meeting with Barak would go ahead as planned, and that the opportunity would be used to send an uncompromising message that there would be no negotiations on the evacuation of outpost without a lifting on the ban on settlement construction in the West Bank.

Barak has not met with the heads of the Yesha Council of Settlements since the evacuation of Hebron's "house of contention" in December 2008.

maandag 31 augustus 2009

Bijna helft scholieren in Israel op Arabische of ultra-orthodox joodse scholen


Dit is zeer verontrustend. Nu de groep ultraorthodoxen in Israel steeds groter wordt, is het niet langer houdbaar dat zij in veel opzichten buiten de maatschappij vallen (onderwijs, werk, militaire dienst). Het land wordt steeds verdeelder omdat er geen gemeenschappelijke basis meer is, en de ultraorthodoxen zijn vaak arm en werkloos en wonen in verpauperde wijken. Hetzelfde geldt voor de eveneens groeiende groep Arabieren in Israel.
 
Israel neemt bedreigingen van buitenaf altijd - en terecht - zeer serieus, maar lijkt die van binnenuit te veronachtzamen....
 
RP
-----------------
 
Study: 48% of pupils are Arab, haredi
Aug. 30, 2009
Abe Selig , THE JERUSALEM POST
 

With the 2009-2010 school year set to begin this Tuesday, a new report released by an independent research institute shows that non-ultra-Orthodox Jews are rapidly becoming a minority in the country's education system, while the soon-to-be majority, Israeli Arab and haredi pupils, are receiving a level of education that is "considerably below Western standards".

Using recently published figures from the Education Ministry, the Taub Center for Social Policy Research, a socioeconomic research group based in Jerusalem, found that at the beginning of the decade, 39 percent of the country's pupils studied in either the Israeli Arab or ultra-Orthodox school systems.

Over the last decade however, preliminary findings from the group's annual survey show that the number of Israeli Arab pupils in the country grew by 10 percent while the number of ultra- Orthodox pupils grew by over five times as much, 51 percent.

In contrast, the study shows that the number of pupils in state-run religious schools grew by 8 percent while the total number of pupils in the largest group of schools - the non-religious state education system - actually decreased in size.

As a result, within the span of just one decade, 48 percent of the country's pupils now study in either the Israeli Arab or the ultra-Orthodox school system, and increase of nearly 10 percentage points. The remainder, which is currently 52 percent of the total - and falling annually, according to the study - are enrolled in either the state-run religious or state-run secular schools.

"In light of the rapidly changing demographics within Israel, the Taub Center concludes that it is vitally important for the country to begin focusing on what is being taught to the children who will be the majority population in a generation, and asks whether they are being given the basic skills to work in a modern economy and live in a modern society," a press release from the Taub Center said.

The Taub Center's Executive Director, Professor Dan Ben-David, said that at present, the answer to this question was an overwhelming "no".

Ben-David explained that a comparison with 25 countries from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), who participated in the 2006 Program from International Student Assessment (PISA) tests, which focused on some of the more important core subjects like math, science and reading, showed that the average achievements of Israel's non-ultra-Orthodox Jewish population were tied with the last place OECD country, while the achievement levels of Israel's Arab pupils were even worse.

"[The Israeli Arab pupils'] grades were 14 percent below the Israeli national average," he said. "And ultra-Orthodox pupils didn't even participate in the exams - no other country excluded such a large proportion of its population from the exams - and the [haredi schools] have no national core curriculum that is enforced."

The report goes on to show that one consequence of the evidence from the educational realm could be found in Israel's labor market, where employment rates for both groups are substantially below what is common in developed countries with correspondingly low average incomes.

"While other factors certainly contribute to the low employment rates, the role played by the education system has been considerable," the report states. "The quickness of the demographic changes that are taking place within Israel's education system and the level of education that is currently being provided to these two groups suggest a current default economic and social trajectory that will not be sustainable in the future."

"A government which does not dramatically improve Israel's educational system in the very near future, with substantial emphasis on improving the quality of education received by these two groups in particular, is letting the country edge ever closer to a point where it may no longer be possible to change direction - with all of the existential implications that this implies for the country," the report concludes.

"I knew that this was happening, but I had never really looked at [it] like this," Ben-David said. "For me it was a real surprise to see how fast these changes were happening, and when you combine them with the level of education these groups are receiving, you have to ask, what kind of country is this going to be in a generation?"

Afgestudeerde Palestijnse scholieren claimen Haifa, Akko, Jaffa en 'ons Arabisch Jeruzalem'


Het gematigde Fatah geluid is overweldigend. Fatah is voor vrede en een tweestatenoplossing?
 
---------------------
 
Moderate Palestinian HS graduaties: "in the name of Palestine: Haifa, Acre, Jaffa, and our Arab Jerusalem."
http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/08/moderate-palestinian-hs-graduaties-in.html
 
(A video is available at the link below.)
 
 
 
 
(IsraelNN.com) Palestinian Authority Arab teens dedicated this year's high school graduation ceremony to "the Shahids (martyrs)... the prisoners... the stone and the rifle."
 
As part of the ceremony, sponsored by the Fatah faction led by PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, the graduates delivered a speech identifying Haifa, Akko, Yafo (Jaffa) and Jerusalem as "Palestine."
 
The Arabic-language festivities were translated by the media watchdog organization, Palestinian Media Watch, which monitors PA news and entertainment media.
 
The ceremony, broadcast July 28, 2009 on Al-Filistinya TV (Fatah), was held on a stage festooned with a sign that read: "Tribute to high school graduates under the auspices of Mahmoud Abbas, Fatah."
 
A transcript of part of the speech follows:
 
Male graduate: "In the name of the Shahids (Martyrs), in the name of the prisoners, in the name of the stone and the rifle."
Female graduate: "In the name of Fatah, the school that taught us the meaning of nationalism."
Male graduate: "in the name of Palestine: Haifa, Acre, Jaffa, and our Arab Jerusalem."
Female graduate: "In the name of Palestine: Gaza, the West Bank and the flag of national unity."
Male graduate: "Fatah is [still] with the rifle. And our rifles are not rusty even if they have fired thousands of bullets."
 
 

Video en petitie: Zweeds bericht over orgaandiefstal IDF kwam uit Palestijnse krant, zoals wel meer fantasieverhalen

 
De beschuldiging van orgaandiefstal door het Israelische leger in Aftonbladet vorige week is zeker niet nieuw, en komt volgens deze video uit een Palestijnse krant. De auteur van het artikel zelf had deze zaken echter al begin jaren '90 van een paar anonieme Palestijnse 'getuigen' gehoord. Ook de bloodlibel kwam in verschillende vormen en tijden voor, en net als de bloodlibel heeft de orgaanlibel broertjes en zusjes: Israel bestraalt de Palestijnen met kanker, verspreidt giftige snoepjes onder de Palestijnen, infecteert Palestijnen met HIV, etc.
 
Teken ook de petitie die de Zweedse regering en Aftonbladet om het artikel te veroordelen.
 
RP
---------------
 
Video and petition: Swedish Organ Stealing Story was invented in Palestine
 
A brief but well researched video notes that the Swedish accusation that IDF is stealing body parts of Palestinians for organ transplants first appeared in 2001 in the Palestinian Authority sponsored newspaper Al Jadeeda. It is one of a series of fantastic Palestinian accusations: Zionists are infecting Palestinians with HIV, Zionists are giving Palestinians cancer, Zionists are distributing poisoned bubble gum etc. none of which ever had the slightest basis in fact.
 
 
Ami Isseroff
 
 

Segregatie in bus splijt burgers van Israël

 
Het gedrang in een overvolle bus is inderdaad niet altijd plezant, zeker voor wat preutsere mensen. Als die ultraordoxe mannen nu zelf achterin gaan zitten en de vrouwen voorin laten zitten, zou dat uitmaken, gevoelsmatig? Verder lijkt me inderdaad beter als ze hun eigen busmaatschappij oprichten, en duidelijk op de bussen zetten dat deze gescheiden vervoer bieden. Egged zou zich hier verre van moeten houden.

Wouter

 
Bussen in Jeruzalem zitten bijna altijd mudvol en instappen betekent een gedwongen kennismaking met een zeer gemengde bevolking. Een bepruikte vrouw in een enkellange rok zit naast een toerist in korte broek en singlet. In het gangpad staat een meisje met grote boezem in een hemdje met spaghettibandjes tegen een van top tot teen in het zwart geklede grootvader geleund.

Vanwege die onvermijdelijke intimiteit tussen de seksen in de reguliere bussen, kiezen steeds meer ultraorthodoxe joden voor alternatief openbaar vervoer, met mannen voor in de bus en vrouwen achterin. In Israël bestaat het systeem al een jaar of twaalf, maar veel vrouwen ervaren dit koosjere vervoer als vernederend en ze laten het er niet bij zitten.

De eerste 'gescheiden' buslijn van de nationale vervoerscoöperatie Egged was vooral ingegeven door commerciële motieven. Ultraorthodoxen vormen hooguit tien procent van de bevolking, maar vanwege hun lage inkomens reizen ze massaal met het openbaar vervoer. Bovendien zijn hun gezinnen doorgaans te kinderrijk voor een personenauto.

De eerste koosjere bussen reden in Bnei Brak, een dichtbevolkte voorstad van Tel Aviv. Bijna iedereen is er ultraorthodox en daarom bleven protesten uit. Op elke bus reed een orthodoxe ordehandhaver mee, al zou het vrome vrouwvolk ook zonder toezicht wel gedwee achterin hebben plaatsgenomen. De Egged-chauffeurs kregen opdracht zich onder geen omstandigheid met de zitplaatsverdeling te bemoeien. Officieel bestonden de gescheiden bussen niet eens.

De problemen begonnen eind jaren negentig toen het busbedrijf, aangemoedigd door het succes in Bnei Brak, nieuwe lijnen opende in Jeruzalem. Op zijn rit van de ene religieuze wijk naar de andere kon de chauffeur moeilijk de vaste halteplaatsen in tussenliggende seculiere wijken overslaan. In plaats van op een 'gemengde' bus te wachten, drongen ongelovigen en modern-religieuzen daar soms het domein van de ultraorthodoxen binnen. Dat leidde tot schreeuwpartijen, geduw en getrek.

Het wachten was alleen nog op een Israëlische Rosa Parks, de zwarte vrouw in de VS die het in 1955 niet langer pikte dat zwarten daar achterin de bus moesten zitten. In de zomer van 2004 nam schrijfster Naomi Ragen demonstratief plaats op één van de voorste banken in een koosjere bus. Zelf religieus, maar niet ultraorthodox, ging ze de discussie aan met mannelijke passagiers. Ze voerde aan dat nergens was aangegeven dat de bus mannen en vrouwen gescheiden vervoerde en dat de joodse religieuze wet haar niet verplichtte achterin plaats te nemen. De reactie was een schreeuwpartij, die eindigde in geduw.

Samen met vijf andere vrouwen diende Ragen uiteindelijk in 2007 een petitie in bij het Hooggerechtshof. Dat bepaalde, in afwachting van een definitief besluit, dat Egged de bestaande koosjere lijnen mag handhaven, maar geen nieuwe mag openen. Het ministerie van Vervoer kreeg de opdracht onderzoek te verrichten naar de behoefte aan segregatie. En op alle koosjere lijnen moet  gemengd vervoer beschikbaar zijn.

De uitkomst van het ministeriële onderzoek wordt in de komende weken verwacht. Centrale vraag: is een bus publiek domein of niet? Tegenstanders van segregatie voeren aan dat Egged gesubsidieerd openbaar vervoer biedt en het belastinggeld misbruikt. Egged zegt dat het alleen maar inspeelt op de behoefte van een groot deel van zijn klandizie.

Er zijn nu al meer dan tachtig koosjere lijnen in alle delen van het land. Als de rechter daar een eind aan maakt, zit het er dik in dat het ultraorthodoxe publiek een eigen busmaatschappij zal beginnen. (AD BLOEMENDAAL)
 
 

Hamas beschuldigt VN ervan kinderen Gaza "Holocaust leugens" te willen leren

 
Is er nog meer bewijs nodig dat Hamas niet alleen anti-Israel maar ook antisemitisch is?
 
Branding the Nazi genocide of the Jews "a lie invented by the Zionists," the Islamist movement that runs the Gaza Strip wrote in an open letter to a senior UN official that he should withdraw plans for a new history book in UN schools.
 
Het is overigens meer dan slap dat UNRWA niet inging op de vraag of men de Holocaust daadwerkelijk in geschiedenisboeken wil opnemen. Het is duidelijk dat UNRWA niet vrij kan opereren in Gaza, maar de UNRWA medewerkers (bijna alleen Palestijnen) hebben zelf waarschijnlijk ook niet veel op met onderwijs over de Holocaust.
 
Het volgende is onjuist:   
 
Palestinians resent the way world powers reacted to the Holocaust by supporting the establishment of Israel in 1948, a move that left half the Arab population of then British-ruled Palestine as refugees in Gaza, the West Bank and abroad.
 
De helft van de bevolking werd niet vluchteling omdat Westerse landen Israel erkenden, maar omdat de Palestijnen en de Arabische landen het delingsplan van de VN afwezen en een oorlog tegen de Joodse gemeenschap in Palestina en Israel begonnen met als doel deze te vernietigen. Daarbij zijn onschuldige Palestijnen het slachtoffer geworden, maar dat valt dus in de eerste plaats hun eigen leiders aan te rekenen.

RP
----------------

Hamas accuses UN of plan to teach Gaza kids Holocaust 'lies'
By Reuters
Last update - 21:56 30/08/2009
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1111110.html

 
Hamas condemned the United Nations on Sunday over the international body's apparent plan to teach Palestinian children in the Gaza Strip about the Holocaust.

A spokesman for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which educates some 200,000 refugee children in Gaza, said the Holocaust was not on its current curriculum. He would not comment on Hamas' statement that it was about to change.

Branding the Nazi genocide of the Jews "a lie invented by the Zionists," the Islamist movement that runs the Gaza Strip wrote in an open letter to a senior UN official that he should withdraw plans for a new history book in UN schools.

Palestinians resent the way world powers reacted to the Holocaust by supporting the establishment of Israel in 1948, a move that left half the Arab population of then British-ruled Palestine as refugees in Gaza, the West Bank and abroad.

Hamas said it believed UNRWA was about to start using a text for 13-year-olds that included a chapter on the Holocaust.

In an open letter to local UNRWA chief John Ging, the movement's Popular Committees for Refugees said: "We refuse to let our children study a lie invented by the Zionists."

UNRWA spokesman Adnan Abu Hasna said: "There is no mention of the Holocaust in the current syllabus." Asked if UNRWA planned to change that, he declined to comment.

In the West Bank, run by the Western-backed Palestinian Authority of President Mahmoud Abbas, teachers said there was no official guidance on teaching about the Holocaust.

Israelis are angered by denial of the Holocaust among some in the Middle East, notably lately by leaders in Iran, who provide support for Hamas. Abbas, who has engaged in negotiation with Israel, has had to distance himself from his own 1980s doctoral thesis, which cast doubt on the scale of the Holocaust.

Hamas' official spokesman in Gaza, Sami Abu Zuhri, said he did not want to discuss the history of the Holocaust but said, "Regardless of the controversy, we oppose forcing the issue of the so-called Holocaust onto the syllabus, because it aims to reinforce acceptance of the occupation of Palestinian land."

zondag 30 augustus 2009

Ronnie Naftaniel over stijging antisemitisme


In "Knevel en Van den Brink" stelde Naftaniel terecht dat het natuurlijk nogal bizar is om in reactie op een belediging van moslims (de Deense Mohammed cartoons) dan maar Joden te gaan beledigen. Joden gaan ook niet in reactie op antisemitische incidenten moslims beledigen. Het toont de zieke geest van de Arabisch Europese Liga, die het heel logisch vindt om cartoons waarin de holocaust wordt ontkend of Anne Frank met Hitler in bed ligt te maken in reactie op de Deens cartoons. De verdediging (laten zien dat ook wij 'taboes' kennen) is flinterdun. In werkelijkheid is dit natuurlijk een mooie aanleiding voor de AEL om over Joden te zeggen wat in de Arabische wereld aan de orde van de dag is, maar in het Westen wat moeilijker ligt.

RP
----------

Ronny Naftaniel: "Antisemitisme in Nederland schrikbarend gestegen"
Auteur Pim van den Dool
http://www.standejong.nl/2009/08/27/ronny-naftaniel-antisemitisme-in-nederland-schrikbarend-gestegen/
27 augustus , 2009


Zijn optreden vorige week in het tv-programma Knevel & Van den Brink leverde hem veel hartverwarmende reacties en nieuwe 'Vrienden van het CIDI' op. Ronny Naftaniel, directeur van het Centrum Documentatie en Informatie Israël, verdedigde in het EO-praatprogramma de gerechtelijke stappen die zijn organisatie onderneemt tegen holocaustcartoons van de Arabisch-Europese Liga. Zeer binnenkort komt het CIDI met de Antisemitisme Monitor 2008. Naftaniel kan alvast verklappen dat het aantal antisemitische incidenten in Nederland vorig jaar en begin dit jaar schrikbarend is toegenomen. Deel 1 van een exclusief interview van Stan de Jong-verslaggever Pim van den Dool met Ronny Naftaniel.

Meneer Naftaniel, hoe kijkt u terug op uw optreden bij Knevel & Van den Brink?
Naftaniel: "Ik heb me de afgelopen dagen afgevraagd of ik er goed aan heb gedaan om met Bouzerda (woordvoerder AEL – red.) in debat te gaan. Toch denk ik dat het belangrijk is om een gevaarlijke organisatie als de AEL van repliek te dienen. Ik heb gelukkig veel positieve reacties op mijn optreden ontvangen."

Maakt u de AEL niet te belangrijk door met ze te debatteren en ze voor het gerecht te slepen?
Naftaniel: "Dat is altijd een dilemma, maar ik vind dat onze wetten op het gebied van de vrije meningsuiting nageleefd moeten worden. Kritiek op Israël of het jodendom is prima, maar als een bepaalde bevolkingsgroep als de joden eigenschappen worden toegedicht als liegen (de AEL-cartoon suggereert dat joden de omvang van de holocaust overdrijven – red.), kun je dat niet over je kant laten gaan. Zeker niet als het gaat om de holocaust, een historisch feit, waaraan mijn achterban traumatische herinneringen heeft."

Het CIDI komt zeer binnenkort met de Antisemitisme Monitor 2008. Is de jodenhaat in Nederland aan het toenemen?
Naftaniel: "U zult gaan schrikken van het aantal incidenten dat vorig jaar en begin dit jaar heeft plaatsgevonden. In januari was er een grote opleving van antisemitisme rond de Israëlische militaire acties in de Gazastrook. Op internet worden joden voor alles en nog wat uitgemaakt, maar daar blijft het niet bij. Wij krijgen meldingen binnen van joden die, wanneer ze met keppeltje over straat gaan, voor 'rotjood' of 'kankerjood' worden uitgescholden of zelfs worden geslagen. In de periode van de Gazaoorlog zijn ook vijf synagoges beschadigd."

Wie hebben al deze acties op hun geweten?
Naftaniel: "Het merendeel van de zichtbare incidenten wordt veroorzaakt door Noord-Afrikaanse jongeren, maar een deel van de uitingen komt ook van autochtone Nederlandse antisemieten."

Het zijn dus vooral moslimjongeren die verantwoordelijk zijn voor de antisemitische incidenten. Waar komt dat volgens u door?
Naftaniel: "Ik denk dat daar een aantal redenen voor zijn. Allereerst komt de hetze die in de Arabische wereld nog altijd tegen Israël wordt gevoerd, via Arabische satellietzenders de huiskamers van Nederlandse moslims binnen. Omdat op die zenders vaak gesproken wordt over 'de joden' en niet over Israëliërs, krijg je dat moslims hier hun joodse medeburgers verantwoordelijk achten voor de daden van het land Israël. Verder is de islam natuurlijk geen vredelievende religie voor andersgelovigen. In 'De gids voor Islamitische opvoeding' bijvoorbeeld, die in sommige Turkse moskeeën verkrijgbaar was, wordt jonge moslims geleerd dat de joden andersgelovigen verderfelijk vinden en uit zijn op wereldheerschappij. Tegen dat soort kwalijke indoctrinatie is het moeilijk vechten, alhoewel wij als CIDI verschillende activiteiten ondernemen om de relatie met jonge moslims te verbeteren."

Voelen joden zich in Nederland nog wel thuis?
Naftaniel: "Het is niet zo dat de Nederlandse samenleving voor joden geen leefbare samenleving meer is. Maar je ziet wel een kleine emigratie van Nederlandse joden richting Israël en de opkomst van de islam boezemt een deel van mijn achterban angst in. In de Arabische wereld woonden ooit 1,5 miljoen joden, nu zijn de joden er praktisch verdwenen."

Tot slot het antisemitische incident uit Zweden, waar een journalist in een links dagblad het Israëlische leger beschuldigde van orgaandiefstal van Palestijnen. Hoe kwam dat bij u binnen?
Naftaniel: "Ik vind het onjuist dat de Israëlische regering nu van de Zweedse regering excuses eist, want de krant en de journalist zitten fout. Deze onsmakelijke insinuaties zie je normaal gesproken alleen op de Iraanse staatstelevisie. Dit is de meest laag bij de grondse vorm van antisemitisme. Die journalist moet ontslagen worden."

Petitie Rode Kruis voor bezoekrecht Gilad Shalit

 
Volgens Der Spiegel online is een deal aanstaande, maar het is altijd goed het Rode Kruis te herinneren aan het feit dat Hamas op flagrante wijze het internationaal recht schendt.
 
RP
-------------
 
 
 
On the occasion of Gilad Shalit's birthday (August 28) we can make a small but meaningful gesture to tell the world that he is not forgotten, and to uphold the "international legitimacy" which is often cited in vain by anti-Israel groups. Tell the International Red Cross to fight for the right to vist Shalit, guaranteed to every prisoner of war under the Geneva Convention.
 
 
 

Keppeltjes uit de Westoever, Palestinasjaals uit China

 
Palestijnen breien de keppeltjes van orthodoxe Joden, ze naaien Israelische vlaggen, ze leveren de betonblokken voor de muur en bouwen de meeste huizen in de nederzettingen. De Palestijnse keffiyeh wordt ondertussen al lang niet meer door Palestijnen gemaakt maar komt tegenwoordig uit China. Commercie en de noodzaak brood op de plank te hebben winnen het van ideologie en principes.
 
RP
-----------
 

Palestinian Kippot and Chinese Kaffiyot: Occupation has another meaning

According to an article [in the Lebanese Daily Star] entitled From Palestinian embroidery to Israeli skullcaps, Arab women in the West Bank are occupied. Their occupation is knitting Kippot (skull caps) for Orthodox Jews. The article doesn't say if the kippot have embroidered on them "Jerusalem" or other such messages. It tells us: 

Of all the cottage industries you might expect to find in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, the Palestinian crocheting of Jewish skullcaps may seem one of the oddest. In fact, it is no more incongruous than the global economy itself. Creating the colorful cap – known as qors (disc) in Arabic and a kippah (dome) in Hebrew – keeps hundreds of women busy in villages like Deir Abu Meshal. The village's women have been making the religious headgear for their Jewish neighbors for some 40 years, though before that they were renowned for their traditional Palestinian dress embroidery.
 
Almost every house in the village of 3,000 west of Ramallah makes the little caps. It's a social event as well as a helpful cash-earner. Women bring their wool and needles to each other's home to crochet and chat.
 
"We make qors while having a gossip," said Umm Ali, a mother of three whose husband is unemployed. "We meet each other and we make money at the same time."
 
The women make around five caps a day, worth about $3 each.
 
"Women here can't sit down without knitting," jokes Ruqaya Barghouthi. "We've gotten used to it."
 
Six Palestinian skullcap dealers distribute the wool, needles and the models to women in this village and 10 neighboring villages. The finished articles are collected each week and shipped to Israeli retailers. The skullcaps are also exported to the US.
 
"The kippah business is what makes my shop busy," said Riyad Ata, whose grocery store serves as a collection point for finished caps from some 100 women. "Women buy stuff from the kippah money they earn."
 
Observant Jews wear a kippah to cover the head in acknow­­ledgement of the supreme God.
 
The women of Deir Abu Meshal see it as a matter of business. They have no qualms about furnishing skullcaps for the people of the occupying po­wer, some say; the work is convenient and they don't have to travel.
 
Working for the occupier is hardly a new thing among Palestinians. Unemployment levels in the Israeli occupied territories, and among Palestinian citizens of Israel, are so high that they have been employed in a wide variety of apparently incongruous labor – from work in Israeli flag factories to building the Israeli separation barrier, which is being erected on expropriated Palestinian land.
 
"Without this knitting business, people here would be very poor," said Nema Khamis, 50, who passed on her skills to her daughters and daughter-in-law.
 
Palestinian weavers used to make the traditional keffiyeh, the chequered Arab headscarf late leader Yasser Arafat made a national Palestinian symbol. Much of that business has now gone to China, where costs are lower.
One meaning of "occupier" evidently, is "one who provides an occupation!
 
Ami Isseroff
 
 

Desmond Tutu en de echte Holocaust mythe

 
Het is een hardnekkige en veelgehoorde mythe: de Palestijnen boeten voor onze zonden, want vanwege de Holocaust zou Europa de Joden een staat hebben gegeven ten koste van de daar wonende mensen. Het is op alle punten onjuist: de Europeanen hebben niks aan de Joden gegeven, maar voor een plan gestemd dat hun de helft van het mandaatgebied Palestina toewees. Ze hebben het land zelf opgebouwd en zelf verdedigd en zelf ontwikkeld en er zelf miljoenen Joodse vluchtelingen een nieuw thuis geboden. Wij hebben de Palestijnen daarbij niet lelijk laten zitten, zoals ook Van Agt beweert, maar zij hebben zelf gegokt en verloren. Zij hebben iedere samenwerking met de Joodse gemeenschap in Palestina afgewezen, werkten niet mee aan gemeenschappelijke instituties die de Britten creëerden, vielen veelvuldig Joodse dorpen en steden aan, en wezen in 1937 en 1947 dellingsplannen van resp. de Britten en de VN af. Direct na het delingsplan van 1947 begonnen zij een oorlog die ze verloren, later gevolgd door de invasie van de Arabische staten. Niet wij zijn voor de Palestijnse misere verantwoordelijk, maar met name hun eigen leiders. Er zijn overigens in de burgeroorlog van 1947/48 van beide kanten oorlogsmisdaden gepleegd.
 
Het recht van de Joden op een eigen staat in hun historische thuisland is niet afhankelijk van de Holocaust; zij is hooguit een tragisch bewijs van het feit dat de Joden zonder zo'n staat niet veilig zijn. En kom nou alsjeblieft niet met het cliché dat ze in Israel ook niet veilig zijn. Ten eerste maken ze zelf wel uit wat ze prefereren, en ten tweede voelde ik me in Israel meestal redelijk veilig.
 
Het is hypocriet te doen alsof wij nu, nadat we Israels stichting passief hebben gesteund, de Palestijnen wat verschuldigd zijn. De houding van Europese landen tegenover Israel was bepaald niet altijd even fraai, en velen lijkt dit argument bijzonder goed uit te komen om hun antipathie jegens Israel en de Joden moreel te rechtvaardigen.
 
RP
----------
 

Tutu to Haaretz: Arabs paying the price of the Holocaust.

Desmond Tutu is a great and admirable man without doubt. His sympathy for the Palestinians and his efforts to help solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are commendable. It is therefore a shame that he decided to do this by promulgating a falsehood. One that causes more harm than good to the cause of peace.


The Arabs did not pay a price for the Holocaust.

Certainly, we could speculate that if it were not for the Holocaust, fewer nations would have said yes to the 1947 partition plan -- a plan which was never actually implemented -- nor did any of these countries do anything to implement. However, we could also argue that since there was already a sizable Jewish minority in Palestine, the idea of partition was hardly far fetched. We could also speculate that perhaps less European Jews would have emigrated to Israel/Palestine if it were not for the Holocaust. However we could also argue that there would have been six million more Jews who could have emigrated. We could likewise speculate that some countries would not have recognized Israel after the 1948 war if it were not for the Holocaust. But then again, many countries and regimes are recognized by world governments all the time.

In any case, it would be mostly speculation anyway. The Holocaust did happen, and this was the only extent to which the Palestinians 'paid the price' for it. Everything else that happened to the Palestinians did not happen because of the Holocaust

The Palestinians did not reject the partition plan because of the Holocaust.

They did not attack the Jewish community in Israel/Palestine because of the Holocaust, nor did they lose the war and become refugees because of it.

The Palestinians did not 'pay the price' of the Holocaust when they were placed in refugee camps by Arab governments, nor was their occupation first by Jordan and Egypt and then by Israel the price of the Holocaust. The bill for that should go to the Arab governments who dealt with the refugees and who sought to make war against Israel in 1967.

Similarly the deaths of Palestinians in Jordan in Black September and in Lebanon in the 70s and 80s had nothing at all to do with the Holocaust and everything to do with the actions of the PLO in those countries.

Neither was it the Holocaust that caused Palestinians to use plane hijacking. The Holocaust did not start the first or second Intifada or initiate suicide bombings or fire Qassam rockets from Gaza against civilians. None of these things nor their effect on the Palestinians were in any way 'payment' for the Holocaust. Nor were the Oslo Accords, the Camp David Summit, the withdrawal from Gaza and the relative quiet enjoyed now by Palestinians in the West Bank.

All of these things were the result of actions taken by the Palestinians, by the Arab countries and by Israel. I do not absolve Israel from responsibility for its sins and mistakes anymore than I absolve the Palestinians for theirs. It is time for all sides take responsibility for their actions and for the effort to find a realistic solution to this conflict rather than use the Holocaust as an excuse for their problems.

Desmond Tutu is a great and admirable man, but he would do well not to promote this falsehood about the Holocaust. Rather than contribute to ending the conflict, it keeps it alive by allowing the Palestinians to view themselves as the passive victims of events that had nothing to do with them. Instead they simply expect that Barack Obama or Desmond Tutu will somehow 'repay' them the 'price' of the Holocaust and force Israel to accept their terms for ending this conflict, namely the elimination of Israel. Desmond Tutu would do better if he left the Holocaust alone and called on both sides to take responsible actions to bring peace to both nations.

Micha Roded

Original content is Copyright by the author 2009. Posted at ZioNation-Zionism and Israel Web Log, http://www.zionism-israel.com/log/archives/00000710.html where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Disributed by ZNN list. Subscribe by sending a message to ZNN-subscribe@yahoogroups.com. Please forward by e-mail with this notice, cite this article and link to it. Other uses by permission only.

 

Duitse geheime dienst onderhandelt voor Israel met Hamas over Shalit

 
Als het waar is ben ik daar niet blij mee, zoals vaker betoogd. Het is overigens bepaald niet zeker dat Shalit nog leeft, en hopelijk eist Israel voordat het definitief met een deal instemt daar een duidelijk bewijs van.
 
RP
--------

German Intelligence Service Negotiating Shalit's Possible Release
SPIEGEL ONLINE (Germany)
 
Three years ago he was kidnapped by Hamas. Will Israeli solder Gilad Shalit soon be freed as a result of negotiations conducted by Germany's BND foreign intelligence service? Under a proposal forwarded by the Germans, at least 450 Palestinians would be released in exchange for the soldier. The deal must still be approved by Hamas.

Germany's foreign intelligence service, the BND, has put forward a concrete proposal in negotiations for the release of kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. According to information obtained by SPIEGEL, Israel would release at least 450 Palestinian prisoners in exchange for Shalit. After his release, the Israeli government has expressed a willingness to release further prisoners.

The government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has insisted that the prisoner releases be done as a humanitarian gesture and without any time pressure. Hamas has been given until the beginning of September to respond to the proposal.

The German negotiator has been activated at the explicit request of the Israeli government and has been commuting since mid-July to conduct negotiations with the parties to the conflict. Shalit was kidnapped in June 2006 on Gaza Strip border and has been in the hands of the Islamist Hamas ever since.

Earlier Talks Failed

In March, direct negotiations between Israel and Hamas failed. Talks in Cairo about a possible prisoner exchange also ended without any results, the Israeli media reported at the time. Those talks were considered, at least for the time being, the last opportunity for an agreement.

The office of then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said at the time that talks had collapsed because of what they described as Hamas' excessive demands. Hamas, for its part, denied that it had hardened its position. One sticking point rejected by Hamas was a demand by Israel that a few dozen prisoners who had participated in the planning or execution of attacks not be allowed to return to the Palestinian territories, but instead get sent to another country.

Hamas waited months after Shalit's kidnapping before releasing an audiotape of the hostage to show he was still alive. A spokesperson for Hamas said in early 2007 that Shalit's family had been given a recording with his voice and also reiterated the Palestinian demand that 1,000 Palestinians be released in exchange for Shalit. Many are said to be women and children. At the time, the Israelis rejected the demand, saying it was excessive.

After the collapse of talks in Cairo in March 2009, Shalit's father wrote an open letter to Ehud Olmert. "We demand that you bring Gilad home before your term in office ends -- even if the price for it is high," Noam Shalit wrote to the departing prime minister. Shalit said he and his wife had sent their son to military service because they had been promised that no one would be left behind. This pact must not be broken, he wrote to the premier. "This letter is a prayer for my son. I ask you, from one father to another: Don't abandon my son."

Olmert was unable to secure the soldier's release. But it could happen this time through the BND's negotiations.
 

Hamas zomerkampen leiden kinderen op te soldaat voor Allah

 
Nee, dit is niet hetzelfde als Israelische soldaten in militaire dienst, want die zijn 18, en ook niet te vergelijken met Israelische zomerkampen met een zionistisch perspectief. Op de Hamas kampen leren de kinderen Israel en de Joden te haten, leren ze dat jezelf opofferen voor de strijd tegen de zionistische vijand het grootste goed is, hier wordt geweld verheerlijkt en leren de kinderen al met wapens om te gaan. Dit is in schending met diverse kinderrechten en internationale verdragen, die kinderen moeten beschermen tegen dergelijk misbruik door milities en gewapende groepen. Misschien dat al die mensen die vinden dat Israel zich aan het internationale recht moet houden wat dit betreft ook hun stem kunnen laten horen?
 
RP
-----------
 
Welcome to Camp Hamas

100 thousand kids and youth spent their summer vacation training in 700 Hamas training camps. The camp's curriculum includes firearm training and military drills in order to nurture the next generation of militants

Arnon Ben-Dror - IDF Spokesperson's Office
 
700 summer camps, for children and teenagers, operated this summer by terror organizations along the Gaza Strip - operating under the slogan - A "Victory for Gaza - The Glory of Jerusalem". The camps are operated by the Hamas in order to encourage the next generation of this organization.  In the same area many summer camps are operated by UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency) - the main "competition" of Hamas's summer camps. The Hamas reacted by presenting the UNRWA camps as "child corrupters", trying to discourage the parents from sending their kids to the foreign aid organization's camp.

According to Arab and Palestinian media, 100 thousand children and teenagers participated in Hamas camps this year. The budget of these camps is estimated to be 2 Million Dollars. The youths were guided by 1,500 counselors that went through special training courses.  A marketing campaign of the Al-Aqsa channel of the Hamas and a special internet site encouraged participation of children in these camps.

The children and teenagers in the summer camps undergo semi military training. The pictures and commercials published this year and last summer showed that part of the curriculum included firearm practices and grenades dismantling as well as military drills for the children, while holding life-like weapons.

In addition to that, the camp participants undergo an intense process of political and Islamic indoctrination by counselors and Hamas operatives, which visit the camps. The camp goal is to train the movement's next generation. According to Mahmud Abu Aeed, the purpose of the camps is to prepare the children for leadership of the organization through "Victory and Freedom".

According to Hamas commercials the camp goal is to "Experience a soldier's life, serving Islam, locating excelling student groups that can operate in the preaching of Allah and Islam, in schools and central mosques." Moreover, the children are taught about the lives of martyrs and carry pictures of them during processions.

zaterdag 29 augustus 2009

Edward Kennedy hielp Joden uit Sovjetunie wegkomen


De deze week overleden Amerikaanse senator Edward Kennedy heeft niet alleen veel voor de VS betekend, maar ook voor de Joden uit de Sovjet-Unie. Vooral het verhaal van CNN hieronder laat zien hoever zijn inzet ging.
 
RP
-----------
 
Thursday, August 27, 2009
 
Ted Kennedy: Friend of the Jews and Israel
http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/08/ted-kennedy-friend-of-jews-and-israel.html

The late Edward Kennedy is remembered as a friend of the Jews and Zionism. According to JTA:
 
Kennedy "was one of the earliest, strongest champions on behalf of Soviet Jewry," said Mark Levin, executive director of NCSJ: Advocates on Behalf of Jews in Russia, Ukraine, the Baltic States & Eurasia. "He was always proactive and didn't wait for NCSJ and other organizations to come to him -- he was always looking to see where he could make a difference."
In his 2006 book, "The Case for Democracy: The Power of Freedom to Overcome Tyranny and Terror," Natan Sharansky specifically mentions Kennedy as the first Western politician to meet with refuseniks "in a midnight meeting that was kept secret from the KGB until the very last moment."
 
And Levin noted that whenever Kennedy met with Soviet officials, in Washington or in the Soviet Union, he would bring lists of those he wanted to see released.
"He never forgot we were talking about individuals and families," Levin said.
 
Kennedy also will be remembered as a strong champion of Israel. Jewish organizational officials noted that he was a stalwart supporter of foreign aid, opposed arms sales to Jordan and Saudi Arabia in the early 1980s, and was a strong backer of recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. He also publicly rebuked President George H.W. Bush when he linked settlements to U.S. loan guarantees for the emigration of Soviet Jews, and was a leading voice in speaking out against the Arab boycott of Israel.
 
Israeli official rushed to praise Kennedy, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu calling the senator "an American patriot" and "a great friend of Israel," according to media reports.
 
And Israeli President Shimon Peres said Kennedy's death was "a very big loss to every sensitive and thinking person the world over."
 
"Kennedy was a clear friend of Israel the whole way, and in every place that he could help us he did help," he added.
 
The late senator drew praise from a broad range of Jewish organizations, including both the Orthodox Union and the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism. They noted that he had worked on a vast array of domestic issues over his 47 years on Capitol Hill, from religious liberty bills such as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, to his efforts on children's health insurance.
YNET tells us that AIPAC published this encomium:
 
"During his more than four decades in the US Senate, Sen. Kennedy consistently supported American assistance to Israel, particularly during the Jewish state's most trying times, in the wake of the Six-Day War and the Yom Kippur War,"
And YNET continues:
 
ADL National Chair Abe Foxman also issued a statement of mourning that praised Kennedy for his "leadership on issues of voting reform, religious freedom, civil rights, hate crime protections and immigration reform."
 
"He fought against anti-Semitism, racism, prejudice and bigotry of all kinds. He was a staunch supporter of Israel and an outspoken advocate for Soviet Jews," wrote Foxman on behalf of the ADL.
 
American Jewish Committee Executive Director David Harris commented that the late senator was a true friend of the Jewish people who could always be relied upon. "His support for the well-being of the State of Israel was always firm, as was his solidarity with vulnerable Jewish communities, particularly those persecuted in the former Soviet Union," said Harris.
 
Andrea Weinstein and Rabbi Steve Gutow, respectively chair and president of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs said of the senator, "Within the Jewish community, Senator Kennedy will always be remembered as a friend of Israel and a supporter of Middle East peace. As an advocate for keeping our nation's borders open and fighting injustices around the world, he was a leading voice of support for Soviet Jewry. We join Senator Kennedy's family and a grateful nation in celebrating his life and mourning the loss of one of our greatest leaders."
 
And from CNN we have this poignant story of Kennedy's courage and attention to the needs of individuals:
 
 BOSTON, Massachusetts (CNN) -- She was called "the littlest refusenik," one of the many Soviet Jews denied permission to leave the Soviet Union because her father had been exposed to government secrets.
 
But the case of Jessica Katz was special because she was a baby born with a nutritional deficiency that stopped her from growing. She was a tiny baby dying in a Moscow hospital, getting weaker by the day.
 
It was U.S. Sen. Ted Kennedy who, her parents say, eventually saved her life.
 
Jessica was born in Moscow in 1977 with malabsorption syndrome, which prevented her from digesting food or milk properly. All she needed was baby formula, but it wasn't available in the Soviet Union.
 
The Soviet doctors couldn't save her. Jessica's parents, Boris and Natalya, were desperate.
 
Jessica's grandmother had immigrated to Boston, Massachusetts, with two of her sons and was campaigning to get her baby granddaughter out of the Soviet Union.
 
At first she helped urge American tourists to take baby formula to Moscow for the Katz family, and for a little while, it worked. It seemed to bring Jessica back from the brink.
But it wasn't enough. The Katz family knew they needed a permanent solution -- access to doctors in the West.
 
Eventually, the grandmother's campaign reached Kennedy's office, and the senator decided to step in. In September 1978, Kennedy traveled to Moscow for a meeting with Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev to urge him to let the Katz family -- or at the very least, Jessica -- leave the country immediately.
 
"If not for his intervention, I would have been arrested very soon [afterward] and it would have been too late for him to intervene," said Katz, recalling the fate of many of his Jewish friends. "So he saved Jessica, he saved me, he saved the rest our family."
 
The first the Katzes knew of it was late one night when they got a mysterious phone call. The caller invited Boris Katz to a midnight meeting with an unnamed guest -- and in Soviet Russia, Katz didn't dare ask who it was.
 
"You know in the Soviet Union not to ask too many questions over the phone," he said.
 
Katz arrived at the meeting and, much to his shock, in walked Kennedy.
 
"A bunch of KGB men came with him into the room and he just turned around and told the KGB men, 'Go away,'" Katz recalled. "This was clearly the first [time] ever I witnessed something like this. Here the all-powerful KGB men wanted to be at the meeting and the senator just told them to go away, and they looked at each other and just left. And that was, again, a powerful scene."
 
Kennedy spoke to other refuseniks already gathered in the room before pulling Katz aside.
 
"He said that earlier he had a meeting in the Kremlin with the Soviet leaders and that he specifically asked to allow us to leave the country for medical reasons," Katz said. "He said that they said yes."
 
At first, Katz said, he didn't believe him, sure that the Soviet authorities would find a way to scupper the plans. Katz went home and told his wife, who also didn't believe it, he said.
 
The next morning, a friend called Katz to say he heard Kennedy on the Voice of America radio network listing the names of people leaving the Soviet Union. The Katz family was on the list, the friend said.
 
Despite the report, however, the Soviet authorities denied it, Katz recalls.
 
"'We are telling you that this is not the case,'" he remembers them saying. "But this was just part of the game that they played."
 
About three weeks later, with no fanfare, a card arrived in the mail telling the Katz family to pick up their visa. They now had their ticket out of the country.
 
The exit wasn't straightforward -- the Katzes' second daughter, Gabriella, was born two days before they were due to leave, so they postponed their exit by five days. And they had to stop over in Vienna, Austria, where they were met by a Kennedy aide for the final leg of their trip.
 
On landing in Boston, Kennedy was the first person they met. They gave each other a big hug, Katz said.
 
"Jessica certainly would not have made it if not for his contribution, if not for him taking on the case, getting interested in the case, patiently talking to the Soviet authorities," Katz told CNN. "It was lucky for us. It saved the baby's life and created new life for Natalya and me and our children."
 
Kennedy's help for the family didn't end there. He helped Boris Katz, who had worked with computers, find a job at a computer software company. Today, Katz works at the renowned Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he is the principal research scientist at the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
 
"He did it because he wanted to help," Katz told CNN. "I think that is what he does -- did -- for many other people. I went to a number of events where other people whom he helped gave various speeches and I learned many more cases [where] he helped people because he likes to help people. It is his job to help people."
 
Today, little Jessica Katz is 31 years old. She got engaged last year, on the same weekend Kennedy's cancer diagnosis was announced to the public.
 
Inspired by Kennedy's life of public service, Jessica Katz works at finding housing for the homeless in New York City. She says she has no choice but to look after those less fortunate than she is, because Kennedy proved to her how much it means, and that it can work.
 
Jessica Katz lacks the cynicism about the government that many others in her generation may have. Kennedy, she said, proved that some politicians have a desire to accomplish good things and fight injustice.
 
"He saved my life. He could have spent his time doing anything," Jessica Katz said. "He's from the fanciest, most powerful family in Massachusetts, and probably in the country, and he decided to spend his time helping out me and my family."
 
That has instilled in her a deep sense of public service, she said. And that may be the best thing Kennedy has left behind.
 
"That that would be his largest, biggest part of his legacy -- as someone who cared deeply about people, who felt, I think, very deeply people's suffering and wanted to alleviate it and wanted to help," Jessica Katz said. "And I am pretty confident that this is how he will be remembered. He was an extraordinary individual and this is how he will stay, certainly in our memories and the memories of millions of others."
Ted Kennedy was one of ours.
 
Ami Isseroff
 
 

Nieuwe ophef in Israël over moord homo's


Ik heb het blijkbaar gemist, misschien omdat we nog met vakantie waren of omdat ik geen zin had om toen we terugkwamen meteen weer alle kranten door te pluizen op zoek naar (negatief) nieuws over Israel. Begin augustus zijn twee homo's in een homo ontmoetingscentrum in Tel Aviv doodgeschoten, en nu roept een anonieme briefschrijver op een ultraorthodoxe website op tot een gerechtelijk onderzoek naar de zogenaamd criminele activiteiten van de betreffende homoclub, die hij beschuldigt van kindermisbruik en verkrachting. Een medewerker van de website zegt volledig achter het artikel te staan en voegt daaraan toe dat
 
homosexuals "are worse than beasts, at least a beast knows it's [homosexuality] wrong, or not natural".
Artzi finished his statements to Haaretz by saying the managers of the gay center "should be forced to face a firing squad".  
 
Het doet denken aan een islamitisch boek dat in Nederland een paar jaar geleden in opspraak kwam omdat erin stond dat homosexuelen van de daken moeten worden gegooid, maar dat is gelukkig nooit uitgevoerd voor zover ik weet. Wel zijn diverse homo's uit wijken waar veel Marokkanen wonen weggepest. Ook fundamentalistische christenen hebben het niet zo op homosexualiteit, en laten dat vooral in de VS op niet zo prettige wijze merken. De drie monotheistische religies hebben inderdaad een en ander gemeen.
 
RP
--------
 
Nieuwe ophef in Israël over moord homo's
24-08-2009 12:11 | Buitenlandredactie

JERUZALEM – In Israël is nieuwe ophef ontstaan over de moord op twee homo's eerder deze maand. Op een ultra­orthodoxe website werd eind vorige week een oproep gedaan om de leiders van een homo-organisatie voor het vuurpeloton te brengen.

Begin augustus schoot een onbekende schutter twee homo's dood in een ontmoetingscentrum voor homoseksuelen in Tel Aviv. Bij de schietpartij vielen ook vijftien gewonden.

Volgens woordvoerders van de homoseksuele gemeenschap in Tel Aviv ging het om een homofobe aanslag. De politie sloot daarop alle ontmoetingsplekken voor homo's in de stad. Enkele uren na het incident verzamelden homo's en lesbiennes zich in Tel Aviv om te demonstreren. Homoseksualiteit is sinds 1988 legaal in Israël, ondanks fel verzet vanuit religieuze kringen.

Dat verzet uitte zich afgelopen weekeinde opnieuw in een ingezonden brief op een website van de ultraorthodoxe Haredi-gemeenschap. Onder de naam "Ysrael Artzi" publiceerde een anonieme auteur een artikel waarin hij de Israëlische politie ertoe oproept de managers van de homogelegenheid in Tel Aviv te arresteren. Volgens hem runnen zij een club waar kinderen worden gemolesteerd en waar „perverse seksuele handelingen" plaatshebben.

„Veel burgers zijn ziek van dit verdorven gedrag, dat elke morele grens mist. Zij verwachten dat de autoriteiten de managers van de club veroordelen voor de misdaden die zij hebben begaan", aldus de brief. De auteur haalt fel uit naar homoseksuelen. „Ze zijn erger dan dieren; een beest weet tenminste nog dat homoseksualiteit verkeerd en tegennatuurlijk is." Het stuk eindigt met de oproep dat de managers „moeten worden gedwongen voor een vuurpeloton te verschijnen."

De brief heeft de spanningen tussen seculiere en religieuze Israëliërs verder opgevoerd. Advocaat Oren Lev, die namens de Israëlische homobeweging optreedt, heeft van de beheerders van de orthodoxe website geëist dat zij het gewraakte artikel verwijderen en een schadevergoeding van omgerekend bijna 100.000 euro betalen. Volgens Lev zet dit soort artikelen tot nieuwe „haatmisdaden" aan.

Orthodox-joodse groeperingen verzetten zich al jaren tegen legalisering en acceptatie van homoseksualiteit in Israël. In het verleden leidde dat regelmatig tot geweld, vooral bij de jaarlijkse homoparade in Jeruzalem.
-----------
Haredi writer: Gays should be forced to face firing squad
 
By Uri Blau, Haaretz Correspondent
 
 
A Haredi Web site this week published an article calling for police to arrest the managers of the Tel Aviv gay center that was the scene of a shooting that left two dead earlier this month, claiming that the managers ran a club where child molestation and acts of sexual perversion took place.

The article on the "Tzofer" Web site, which had the headline "Prosecute the managers of the club where the murders happened", said the gay center's management should stand trial for "the acts they carried out on minors behind the walls of that club of perversion".

The article, which appears under the byline "Yisrael Artzi", presents an anonymous letter sent to the Web site and to the Israel National Council for the Child, requesting that authorities investigate the activities carried out inside the club.
The article ends with the statement "many citizens are sick of this depraved behavior that lacks any moral boundaries, and expect the authorities to prosecute the managers of the club for the crimes they have carried out".

In response to the article, a lawyer for the Israeli LGBT organization contacted Tzofer and requested that they retract the article and pay the organization NIS 500,000 in damages. Attorney Oren Lev said articles of its sort "will lead to further hate crimes".

Tzofer writer Yisrael Artzi said he did not know who wrote the article, but did not shy away from issuing his own condemnation of the LGBT community.

"These perverts take everything out into the street, into the public domain. A child, religious or secular, doesn't need to know they exist".

Artzi added that homosexuals "are worse than beasts, at least a beast knows it's [homosexuality] wrong, or not natural".

Artzi finished his statements to Haaretz by saying the managers of the gay center "should be forced to face a firing squad".

Twee leugens over Israel en vrede en de VS

 
Sultan Knish is misschien wat kort door de bocht hier en daar, maar het is verfrissend eens een betoog te lezen over hoe gering Israels invloed op het Midden-Oosten in feite is, en hoe weinig succesvol de Israellobby in de VS is.
 
Je zou kunnen argumenteren dat Israel voor veel Arabieren een grote symbolische waarde heeft, en een einde aan de bezetting wel degelijk hun houding tegenover het westen zou beinvloeden. Zelf denk ik dat het probleem daarmee niet is opgelost: Israel is voor veel Arabieren een vernedering. Niet zozeer de bezetting, maar Israel zelf, het feit dat zij succesvol is en de Arabische staten op alle gebieden voorbij is gestreefd, en dat zonder olie en met veel vijanden. De bezetting symboliseert de Arabische vernedering. Dat men door Joden, die in de islam als dhimmi's worden gezien, tweederangsburgers die minderwaardig zijn, is verslagen maakt de vernedering des te pijnlijker.
 
De bezetting is niet zozeer het kernprobleem maar een symptoom. De Arabische weigering Israel te erkennen en er vrede mee te sluiten leidde tot de bezetting, die de wens zaken recht te zetten en de vernedering ongedaan te maken alleen nog maar heeft versterkt. Pas wanneer de Arabieren de wens om 'historisch onrecht' (lees: de vernederingen van 1948 en 1967) ongedaan te maken los kunnen laten en bereid zijn mee te werken aan een oplossing die ook goed is voor Israel én de Palestijnen, is vrede mogelijk.
 
RP
----------

 
Sultan Knish, August 2009
 
 
There are two interconnected lies that reside at the heart of any American discussion about Israel. The first lie is that the road to peace in the Middle East lies through Israel. The second lie is that Israel controls American policy toward itself. Those lies are not the product of ignorance or misunderstanding, they are the product of an effective propaganda campaign by the unofficial suit and tie spokesmen of the Saudi lobby who dominate American policy in the Middle East. The goal of that campaign has been to make Israel seem like the axis on which the Middle East and America turn, in order to put Israel on the firing line. And it is a campaign that has been wickedly successful up until now. 
 
Let's take a moment to examine those lies now.
 
Within the Middle East, Israel is physically insignificant. At 8500 square miles, Israel could not just fit comfortably into Pennsylvania, it is 1/5th the size of Jordan, 1/8th the size of Syria and 1/12th the size of Egypt. Simply put, Israel is smaller in land and population than every country that borders it. If you looked at the Middle East from space, you could easily put a fingernail across all of Israel.
 
Israel has beaten all of these countries in wars and has the best military in the region, but that is because if it didn't, it wouldn't exist. Israel's military is not the product of a will to conquer, but of an attempt to maintain its own territorial integrity and protect its citizens from attack. Israel's neighbors have never needed to work as hard or spend as much to maintain their own armed forces, because they don't truly need them. For them a strong army is not a survival strategy, it is optional.
 
All those who rant endlessly about Israel's settlements in the West Bank and Gaza as proof of Israel's desire to seize land, forget that Jordan annexed the West Bank only two years after its forces captured it in the 1948 War of Independence. Israel has not annexed the West Bank even after more than 40 years, and has continued to offer it in peace negotiations year after year. That is not the policy of an aggressive land hungry regime. It is not the behavior of a country that keeps its neighbors up late at night. While Israel's leaders have spent over half a century staying up late at night worrying about a war, Israel's neighbors know that war is their choice.
 
But what this means in practice is that Israel has very little influence beyond its own borders. With a small size, no expansionist program beyond its own territory, and as one of only two non-Arab states and the only non-Muslim state in the region... Israel's impact on the rest of the Middle East is surprisingly limited. To get a proper picture of Israel's role in the Middle East, imagine plopping Singapore in the middle of a wartorn part of Africa. It can be attacked, it can fight back, but it cannot have any real local influence.
 
That is why Israel remains an outsider in the political trends and turmoil of the region. The shift between Arab Nationalism and Islamism, the coups and the bloodletting between Shiite and Sunni, are all events that Israel watches from a distance. Israel is not a political participant in the ideological conflicts of the Middle East, because it does not share a common religion or ethnicity or much of anything with its neighbors. Its diplomatic relations are primarily formal, not intimate. As a result Israel has very little political influence on the Middle East, and what little influence it has, is on its immediate neighbors, such as Lebanon and Jordan, who are fairly small on the scale of the Middle East as well.
 
Furthermore Israel and its neighbors are in part of the Middle East that has become largely irrelevant because of its lack of oil. While Egypt and Jordan were once considered major regional players, both have long ago been sidelined by the oil rich Saudi Arabia, Iran and the UAE. None of these countries share a common border with Israel. While diplomats and pundits obsess over the West Bank and Gaza, what happens there has virtually no impact on what happens where the oil and power lie.
 
Not only does the road to peace in the Middle East not run through Israel, it doesn't even run anywhere near Israel.  A quick look at a map shows you just how off the beaten path Israel is when it comes to the true token of global power, oil. And it is not some Elders of Zion fantasy of the Israel lobby that defines global power to the Middle East, it is who has the oil. And  while Israel has plenty of olive oil, it has none of the kind of oil that the world is interested in.
 
Since the 70's, the Middle East's real power struggle has shifted to the oil rich states, to Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states. Iran and Iraq chose to build up their armies, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states instead built up their political influence in Washington D.C. and let the United States fight for them. This strategy paid off in the Gulf War and Operation Iraqi Freedom when Kuwait was liberated and Saudi Arabia got Saddam's boot off its throat. Israel was never at risk of anything more than bomb blasts and rocket shelling from Saddam. By contrast Saudi Arabia and Kuwait had their survival at stake.
 
With Saddam gone, Iran and Saudi Arabia are funding Sunni and Shiite insurgencies within Iraq in order to seize Saddam's oil. As a fallback position in case Iran manages to swallow Iraq and then moves on to them, the Sheiks and Princes continue buying huge stakes in American and European companies and property, in case they suddenly find themselves having to take a quick plane trip away from the region.
 
Remove Israel from the region, as so many diplomats and pundits would like to, and this picture remains exactly the same. How influential is Israel in the region then, and why does the path to Middle Eastern peace run through it? The answer is that it doesn't. Some diplomats choose to blame America's alliance with Israel for its image problems, but alliances are dictated by interests. American's alliance with Israel, much like Saudi Arabia's alliance with America, are the products of interests, not emotions. Iran's hostility to America is the product of religious hostility, historical animosity and its own desire to grab as much of the Middle East for itself as it can.
 
Let's turn to Washington then. The myth of the All-Powerful Israel lobby has been extensively marketed for decades. But let's actually take a look at how powerful this lobby is.
 
If the so-called Israel Lobby is so powerful, why after all these decades, has the United States failed to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital? Presidential candidates routinely visit AIPAC to promise that Jerusalem will be recognized as Israel's capitol. Bill Clinton did it, Bush promised that it would be one of his first acts in office, Obama implied it. And once in office, not only did they not keep the promise, but they routinely signed waivers to prevent Jerusalem from being treated as Israel's capital.
 
There is only one nation whose capital is not recognized by the United States. That nation is also the one who the wisdom of the mainstream media and many of the suit and tie unofficial members of the Saudi lobby, would have you believe controls America. The narrative of the powerful Israel lobby before whom everyone in D.C. trembles cannot be reconciled with this simple fact, or with many others.
 
For example, in every peace agreement completely under US mediation, Israel has given up land and never gained any permanent territory. If Israel were as expansionist and as in control of the United States government, should it not have been the other way around? Yet at Camp David, Carter pressured Begin into turning over land that was several times the size of Israel. Carter did not pressure Sadat to turn over land to Israel. The last four US administrations have pressured Israel into a peace process with the PLO that required Israel to transfer a sizable portion of land to their control. At no point in time were Egypt and Jordan expected to do the same. Does this sound like the product of an all-powerful Israel lobby.
 
Defenders of the "Israel Runs Washington" meme will argue that the US should have pressured Israel to do much more. As if Israel could do anymore without committing suicide. But then why hasn't the United States pressured Turkey to stop its occupation of Cyprus or demanded that Spain create a state for the Basque? Either the Turkish Lobby or the Spanish Lobby is far more powerful than the Israel Lobby, or Israel is singled out because of pressure from a much stronger lobby, the Saudi Lobby.
 
What the "Israel Lobby" mainly deals with is the back and forth arms trade between the United States and Israel, partially packaged as foreign aid, and non-binding congressional resolutions that have as much force as a municipal resolution naming Tuesday, Global Twig Day. Most congressmen identify as Pro-Israel, mainly because it's easy, costs them nothing and lets them pick up a few votes here and there. It is easy enough to vote on or co-sponsor the occasional pro-Israel resolution that does nothing but gather dust in the record cabinets, because it has no actual application. It is so ridiculously easy that even Barack Obama has done it. And it's so meaningless that no President takes them seriously. Any measure that actually has legislative force is routinely crafted so that the President can waive it or set it aside if it interferes with administration policy. Which is exactly what happens much of the time.
 
As a result most congressmen can mention a pro-Israel bill that they voted on or co-sponsored around election time to gullible Jewish audiences who fail to understand that the 2012 Israel Friendship Act or the 2043 No Money Given to Terrorists, We Really Mean It This Time Act, has as much practical utility as a cell phone in the Sahara. And few of these same congressmen are actually pro-Israel when it matters. They're pro-Israel when it's an exercise in public relations. That is not what a powerful lobby's grip on a government looks like. If you want to see that, take a look at the lobbyists for the pharmaceutical industry or the cable industry. Or the Saudi lobby, which doesn't waste time holding rubber chicken dinners for politicians, but instead has built a massive contact base of unofficial suit and tie lobbyists, former politicians, diplomats and journalists who are expert at peddling the Saudi agenda.
 

To determine the power of a lobby, you look at what it can do when it matters, and when the odds are against it. The one direct collision between the Pro-Israel lobby and the Saudi lobby over the AWACS sale to Saudi Arabia, ended with a Saudi victory, despite overall public and congressional opposition to the sale. The Pro-Israel lobby was vocal and public. The Saudi lobby was in control behind the scenes. And just as it had when Saudi Arabia took over ARAMCO, and forced the United States to pay for it too... the Saudi Lobby won.
 
That is what a lobby that controls Washington D.C. does. It doesn't put out a nameplate. It doesn't waste time on rubber chicken dinners. It instead funds a host of organizations officially headed up by Americans with influence and power in Washington D.C. It gives them the funds to cultivate ties, to build think tanks and to build relationships behind the scenes. It doesn't care whether it's dealing with Republicans or Democrats. Come one, come all. We can put you to use too. And it makes sure that nobody pays very much attention to what is going on. Instead it dips into well worn propaganda to spread the idea that the Jews control Washington D.C., knowing that there will be plenty of eager takers to polish and pass on the meme.
 
If you look at what some of the most powerful people in the last few administrations had in common, the simple answer is oil. Saudi oil. The woman in control of foreign policy in the second half of the Bush Administration, Condoleeza Rice, did not have her name on an Israeli oil tanker, but a Chevron oil tanker, the former parent company of ARAMCO. The man quietly dominating US foreign policy under Obama, James L. Jones did not serve on the board of directors of Manischewitz, he served on the same Chevron board of directors that Rice had formerly served on. And Rice did everything but outright appoint him as her replacement.
 
But of course no one could possibly believe a wild conspiracy theory like that, not when the obvious answer is that the Israel Lobby controls Washington D.C. and keeps demanding that administration after administration force it to hand over land to its worst enemies. And for some reason forces successive administrations to not recognize its own capital city, encourages them to constantly threaten it and prevent it from defending itself.
 
The Pro-Israel Lobby is a charade, a showpiece for people with too much time on their hands and too little subtlety. If half the claims about the Israel Lobby were true, Israel would be four times the size it is today, with secure borders and no terrorist problem. Instead Israel has been pressured like no other country has, to appease and accommodate terrorists at the expense of the lives of its citizens, its national security and even its survival... by a foreign policy crafted to fulfill Saudi interests.
 
The Big Israel Lie is that Israel is powerful in Washington and mighty in the Middle East. The real truth is that Israel is a tiny country that commands emotional affinity from a limited percentage of Jews and Christians, whose diplomacy abroad is clumsy, and whose regional influence is small, whose military is handicapped by liberal handwringing and whose leaders would rather negotiate than fight... until there is no other choice.
 
This lie is meant to make Israel seem strong, in order to place it at the center of every problem and turn it into the nail that needs to be hammered down for everything to stand straight. But the easiest way to clear up the lie is to simply look at the reality of the Middle East and see that Israel vanishes beneath a single fingernail.