woensdag 8 juli 2009

Religieuze Kulturkampf in Israel


De toenemende religieuze invloed en dwang, en de spanningen die dat oproept met de seculiere Joden, is een van de grote problemen van Israel. Religieuze partijen, vaak nodig om een coalitie aan een meerderheid te helpen, dwingen grote geldbedragen af voor religieuze scholen en andere instituties, uitzonderingsbepalingen voor het leger, geen openbaar vervoer en andere zaken op sabbath etc. en dat botst soms met het democratische karakter van de staat en de scheiding van synagoge en staat. Ook excessen als speciale buslijnen waarin vrouwen en mannen apart moeten zitten komen voor, al is dat alleen in bepaalde ultra-orthodoxe wijken. Er zijn overigens grote verschillen binnen de orthodoxe Joodse gemeenschap, en onderstaand artikel is dan ook zeker niet anti-religieus.

RP
----------------

The Jerusalem Post
Jul 6, 2009 9:50 | Updated Jul 6, 2009 15:25
Candidly Speaking: The religious kulturkampf
By ISI LEIBLER
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443729260&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


The intense political and economic challenges confronting us divert attention from a festering kulturkampf within the religious arena the outcome of which will impact heavily on the future of Israeli society.

Orthodox Jews were never a monolithic group. Over the past century major divisions separated Zionists and anti-Zionists; those favoring stringent applications of Halacha versus those seeking more liberal interpretations; those rejecting secular studies beyond religious learning versus those seeking to synthesize learning Torah with worldly knowledge.

Current trends display a strengthening in the power of the non-Zionist and more extreme religious elements. This is reflected in the extraordinary growth of the haredi school network with almost 25 percent of Jewish first graders currently estimated to be enrolled in the haredi Ashkenazi or Sephardi educational streams. If the high haredi birthrate (a major asset in maintaining Jewish demographic levels) is sustained, the proportion of haredi schoolchildren in the general population will further increase.

In most developed countries, haredim are not exempt from mandatory government requirements that all children receive a minimal secular education. However here, to obtain haredi political support, the Olmert government agreed to extend state funding to the haredi educational network while simultaneously granting it complete autonomy from the government educational network, thus effectively legitimizing the exclusion of core secular curriculum subjects. The current government has also been pressured into providing additional funds exclusively to the independent haredi school system.

The social, economic and political repercussions of these developments will impact over the next few decades. In an approach without precedent in Jewish tradition, most haredi schoolchildren are being encouraged to disdain the virtues of earning a livelihood. One of our great sages, Maimonides (who would doubtlessly be disqualified from teaching in a typical haredi school because of his secular education) wrote in Mishna Torah, "Whoever thinks he can study Torah and not work, and relies on charity, profanes God's name."

In addition, during these difficult times, graduates from haredi schools obliged to seek employment are discovering that having been denied a secular education and lacking professional skills, they are doomed to a life of poverty and reliance on welfare.

An additional offshoot of this system is an accelerating increase in haredi youngsters evading the draft. It is surely bizarre for religious Zionists to be proportionately overrepresented in IDF combat units, willing to fight and die for their country, while their haredi counterparts, without any genuine halachic justification, as evidenced by the tiny but admirable haredi IDF unit, are directed by their rabbis to shirk their national obligations.

THE HAREDI HIJACKING of state rabbinical instrumentalities and courts is also having major negative social repercussions. A substantial proportion of the newly appointed haredi rabbis, chosen on the basis of cronyism, are utterly unsuited for their roles. Many are also unreconstructed anti-Zionists, refusing to recognize the flag, the national anthem, Independence Day and other obligations of living in a Jewish state.

Even the Chief Rabbinate, once the bastion of religious Zionism, has been transformed into an haredi fiefdom, despite undisguised haredi contempt for the institution. Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger is universally regarded as a mere puppet of the zealots.

The displacement of Zionist rabbis by extremists paves the way for further problems, such as efforts to undermine the heter mechira (sale of land) introduced nearly a century ago by chief rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook to enable farmers to maintain their produce and livelihood during the shmita year.

The most disastrous impact of the haredi dominated rabbinical courts applies to conversion, where fanatical zealots like Rabbi Avraham Sherman are striving to impose unprecedentedly extreme and cruel halachic interpretations.

Sherman went so far as to retroactively annul conversions on grounds of alleged laxity in ritual observance. More outrageously, he accused highly venerated Zionist Rabbi Haim Druckman of expediting fraudulent conversions. He proclaimed that over the past 15 years, thousands of conversions approved by the government Conversion Authority headed by Druckman must be considered invalid unless endorsed by one of his haredi rabbis. Metzger, whose own beit din had supervised these conversions, created a furor after endorsing Sherman's approach and was even called upon to resign.

Every individual is entitled to impose upon himself the most rigorous application of Halacha. Besides there are many positive aspects to the haredi lifestyle that Israelis could emulate to their advantage and a constructive haredi presence should be an important element in the tapestry of Israeli life.

But when zealots leverage their political positions to intrude on personal lives or impose extreme standards on the entire nation, it only serves to alienate people from religion. Even Israelis who support the strengthening of Jewish values within the framework of the state, are angered and frustrated when haredi political zealots leverage their positions to extort sectional concessions which frequently conflict with the national interest.

There are enlightened Orthodox groups sensitive to these tensions which endeavor to promote religious precepts in a nonconfrontational manner. They also encourage a review of Halacha, which has evolved over thousands of years of exile, to relate to the needs of a modern democratic Jewish state. They include organizations like Eretz Hemda, Beit Morasha, Tzohar, Bar-Ilan University and many others who cultivate the shvil hazahav, Maimonides's designated golden path of moderation and tolerance.

THERE IS a need for religious Zionist rabbis and laymen to become more assertive. Religious Zionist parliamentarians scattered among Knesset political parties should insist that state funds for religious functionaries serving in rabbinical courts be channeled toward Zionist rabbis who send their children to the army, embrace modernity and can communicate with university-educated youngsters. While endeavoring to strengthen the Jewish character of the state, they must act on behalf of the nation as a whole and demand an end to shady deals with haredi parties promoting narrow sectional interests. The neutralization of haredi power to extort or veto reform is an additional reason why Kadima should act in the national interest and join the government.

There are ticking time bombs waiting to explode. The aggressiveness of extremist groups, like the Eda Haredit in Jerusalem, which over the past weeks threatened "to set the country on fire" if a proposed Jerusalem parking lot remained open on Shabbat, must be dealt with firmly or the anti-Zionist zealots will achieve a new lease of life.

The time to confront burning issues such as the haredi school system, military service, conversions and Shabbat legislation is now.
 

Shoah slachtoffers waren gereincarneerder zondaars volgens leider Shas

 
In 'alternatieve kringen' is het niet ongebruikelijk om te geloven dat wat mensen overkomt, op een of andere wijze door henzelf is veroorzaakt of zelfs gekozen, in dit leven of een vorig leven. Ik ken zelf verschillende mensen die dat in meerdere of mindere mate geloven, en ook menen dat alles wat mensen overkomt een diepere betekenis heeft of 'moest' gebeuren. Op mijn vraag of dat dan ook geldt als mensen ernstig ziek worden of een zwaar ongeluk krijgen, antwoordde een vrouw die in een Indiase spirituele gemeenschap heeft gewoond en meditatielessen geeft, bevestigend. Ontkennen van toeval en overal een diepere zin of betekenis achter zoeken is iets dat alle religies verbindt, maar juist het feit dat dit tot extreme conclusies kan leiden als onderstaande is voor mij een reden om het bij de wetenschap, de evolutie en het toeval te houden, hoe kil dat soms ook lijkt.
 
RP
----------

The Jerusalem Post
Jul 5, 2009 9:53 | Updated Jul 6, 2009 5:56
Ovadia Yosef: Shoah victims - reincarnated sinners
By JPOST.COM STAFF
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443718416&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


Shas spiritual leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef has argued that those murdered in the Holocaust were a reincarnation of sinners from past generations, Ma'ariv reported on Sunday.

In his weekly Saturday evening sermon, whose subject was the period between the 17th of Tamuz and Tisha Be'av fasts, the rabbi explained that on Tamuz 17, a number of calamities had occurred, including the breaching of Jerusalem's walls which led to the destruction of the Temple on Tisha Be'av, as well as the sin of the golden calf which led to the shattering of the Tablets of Stone.

"There is no calamity that the people of Israel suffer that isn't part of [the punishment for] the sin of the golden calf. The tragedies we've endured throughout generations - the Inquisition, the Holocaust - they are all part of the sin of the golden calf," Rabbi Yosef explained.

"After all, people are upset and ask why was there a Holocaust? Woe to us, for we have sinned. Woe to us, for there is nothing we can say to justify it," he said.

"It goes without saying that we believe in reincarnation," continued Yosef. "It is a reincarnation of those souls. Our teacher The Ari said that there are no new souls in our generation…all the souls were once in the world and have returned.

"All those poor people in the Holocaust…we wonder why it was done. There were righteous people among them. Still, they were punished because of sins of past generations."
 

Gaza smokkeltunnels gaan tot 60 meter diep


Als alle voedsel- en luxeproducten weer gewoon geimporteerd kunnen worden in de Gazastrook, zal dat de smokkel via tunnels een stuk minder aantrekkelijk maken, en is het wellicht makkelijker de wapensmokkel via de tunnels te bestrijden. Ik begrijp wel dat Israel de grenzen niet geheel wil openen zolang Shalit nog vast zit en zolang Hamas de grenzen controleert, maar daardoor is de smokkel een bloeiende business geworden waar tienduizenden Gazanen, misschien zelfs meer, van leven.
 
RP
-----------------


The Jerusalem Post
Jul 3, 2009 8:54 | Updated Jul 4, 2009 19:29
US engineers: 'Gaza tunnels now 60m deep'
By YAAKOV KATZ
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443709998&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


American engineers who serve as consultants for the Egyptian military have recently informed Israel that Hamas has succeeded in digging 60-meter deep smuggling tunnels to avoid detection and destruction by the IDF, defense officials said on Thursday.

The American engineers, deployed as consultants along the Philadelphi Corridor in Egyptian Rafah, have been using technology that can detect seismic movements to uncover tunnels. But it is more difficult to detect them once they have reached the 60-meter depth, the engineers told their Israeli counterparts.

According to IDF assessments, Hamas now has several hundred active tunnels under the Philadelphi Corridor, even though close to 300 were reportedly bombed by the Israel Air Force during Operation Cast Lead in December and January.

Digging to the new depths required special techniques, one official said.

"The Palestinians are experts at digging tunnels," the official said. "They reach 60 meters, pump out the groundwater, and pump in air so they can continue digging."

Defense officials said that since Cast Lead, Cairo had increased its efforts to uncover and destroy smuggling tunnels. The Egyptian efforts have also focused on stopping weapons before they reach the Philadelphi Corridor and as they make their way to the border with Sinai.

A senior IDF officer said the army was reassessing the effectiveness of bombing tunnels from the air. "We found that it takes the Palestinians just a few days to rebuild the tunnels after we bomb them," the officer said.

According to a recent report on Al-Arabiya TV, the tunnel-smuggling industry in Gaza is valued at $200 million annually, yielding huge profits for the Palestinian and Egyptian owners of the tunnels. There are 800 tunnels along the Gaza-Egyptian border, Al-Arabiya said.

"These tunnels are the lifeline of the Gaza Strip. This is the only place where you don't feel you are in a besieged city. All products are available - electronic appliances, flour, sugar and all other food products - and even diapers and Viagra pills," according to a transcript of the TV report provided by MEMRI: The Middle East Media Research Institute.
 

War and Peace Index: 60% Joodse Israëli's tegen Palestijnse staat volgens grenzen 1967

 
De antwoorden hangen altijd in hoge mate af van hoe de vraag is gesteld. 'Verdienen de Palestijnen een staat?' Ik zou zeggen, in principe wel, maar niet ten koste van Israels veiligheid, en daar zit hem het probleem, want volgens veel Israeli's zal dat wel zo zijn, of is het op z'n minst onzeker. Het hangt er vanaf hoe je de toekomst inschat. Wat zou tot meer onveiligheid en problemen leiden: de voortdurende bezetting of een Palestijnse staat? Ook is de vraag onder wat voor voorwaarden een Palestijnse staat er komt, of er een landruil komt en wat er met Jeruzalem gebeurt, maar daar wordt in deze enquete niet op ingegaan.

Opvallend is dat zelfs onder Likoedstemmers een ruime meerderheid erkent dat de Palestijnen een volk zijn, en van de mensen die dat erkent is 80% voor een Palestijnse staat.

RP
-------------

War and Peace Index-June 2009

Prof. Ephraim Yaar and Prof. Tamar Hermann


The position of Prime Minister Netanyahu, which includes agreeing that Israel will not establish new settlements but stands by its right to expand existing ones according to natural growth, is endorsed today by most of the Israeli Jewish public: 61% support it while 31% oppose it (the rest have no position). The support for Netanyahu's position is shared by voters for all the parties except Meretz, only 7% of whose voters support it, and Labor, whose voters are evenly split between supporters and opponents.

However, the broad support for Netanyahu's position erodes considerably, and the gap between the two camps narrows, when one mentions to the interviewees the possibility that implementing Netanyahu's position could cause a worsening of relations with the U.S. government. Under that scenario, only 40% still support Netanyahu's position while a slightly higher rate (48%) oppose it. In other words, more than one-third of those who, in principle, support Netanyahu's policy on the settlements issue would oppose, in this context, risking a deterioration of relations with the Obama administration.

Positions on the settlements issue are linked, of course, not only to U.S.-Israeli relations but primarily to the public's positions regarding the Palestinians. This time we checked a few basic questions in this context, and we found that a clear majority- 62%-of the Israeli Jewish public today recognizes the existence of a Palestinian people (32% oppose this and the rest do not know). A segmentation by voting for the Knesset reveals that only among voters for Shas, the Jewish Home, and the National Union does the majority claim there is no such thing as a Palestinian people. Among those who recognize that the Palestinians are a people, an overwhelming majority of 80.5% also supports the right of the Palestinian people to an independent state. Even among those who do recognize the Palestinian people, however, there are still about one-fifth who do not recognize its right to a state or have no position on the matter. In the total Jewish sector today, then, only a small majority of 50% say the Palestinians deserve an independent state of their own, 43% do not think so and the rest do not know.

The smallness of the majority that recognizes the Palestinians' right to an independent state can be explained in terms of the prevailing view in the Jewish public (71%) that most of the Palestinians do not recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people. This position is common to voters for all the parties although, not surprisingly, among Labor and Meretz voters the proportion of those who think most of the Palestinians recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people is considerable-42% and 35%, respectively. The widespread public position on this question is significant in light of Prime Minister Netanyahu's claim that the Palestinians should publicly recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people. It also points-again-to the great convergence we have found recently between the positions of the current government and those of most of the public on questions concerning Israeli policy on the Palestinian issue.

Moreover, we also found in this survey that even recognition by the Palestinians of Israel as the state of the Jewish people would not necessarily strengthen the Jewish public's willingness for a territorial compromise. Indeed, some 60% say they would oppose a Palestinian state that would include all the territories conquered in 1967, even if there was official Palestinian recognition of Israel as the state of the Jewish people. The exceptions on this issue are voters for Meretz and Kadima, a majority of whom supports a withdrawal to the 1967 borders if there is Palestinian recognition of Israel as the state of the Jewish people. A majority of the Jewish public (56%) also opposes Israel taking even partial responsibility for the suffering caused to the Palestinians by the 1948 war, including, for example, the creation of the refugee problem, even if the Palestinians were to officially take part of the responsibility for the Naqba. Only among Meretz voters is a majority-78%-prepared to accept partial responsibility if the Palestinians take partial responsibility as well.

In contrast to the convergence between the public and the government on the Palestinian question, on the question of Gilad Shalit a clear majority of the Jewish public is currently critical of the government's policy. Fifty-nine percent think the government's approach is neither effective nor wise while 31% take the opposite view (10% do not know). The dissent from the government's policy on this issue is shared by voters for all the parties except the Jewish Home, without disparities of age, gender, religiosity, education, or income. Not surprisingly, then, a majority (58%) recommends to the Shalit family that they intensify their protest activity. This position is common to a majority of the public without party, age, economic, or other disparities, with one notable exception that raises questions on the influence of gender regarding issues connected to parenthood: a full 70% of women support intensifying the protest while among men the supporters and opponents are evenly split. This gap is all the more significant considering that generally women tend less than men to support protest, let alone intense protest.

 
The War and Peace Index is funded by the Evens Program in Mediation and Conflict Resolution of Tel Aviv University. The telephone interviews were conducted by the B. I. Cohen Institute of Tel Aviv University on June 30-July 1, 2009 and included 503 interviewees who represent the adult population of Israel (including the territories and the kibbutzim). The sampling error for a sample of this size is 4.5%.


--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il
-----------------------------------

Joden van Koerdistan in de knel

 
Afkomstig van: Point of no return (Information and links about the Middle East's forgotten Jewish refugees)
 
Voor ons eigen artikel over Joodse vluchtelingen uit de Arabische wereld, zie hier.
 
Wouter
_____________________

Saturday, July 04, 2009

Kurdistan won't expel Jews, but can't secure them

http://jewishrefugees.blogspot.com/2009/07/kurdistan-wont-expel-jews-but-cant.html
 
There are no cats in America. Or are there? The embarrassing question of whether there are still Jews in Kurdistan - and what to do with them - has reared its ugly head again, according to a Kurdish reporter whose name we are withholding for his own safety (With thanks: Ami).

The government of Kurdistan is being urged by hard-line officials publically to declare that there are no Jews in Iraqi Kurdistan. Yet is is common knowledge that a number of Jewish families still remain there.

A Kurdish reporter quoted a senior source as saying: " the government will not expel any remaining Jews but equally we can't guarantee full security for them. At the same time we will not prevent the state of Israel (from acting) if they want to take them back".

The reporter told how last year on (Israeli) Channel 10, a program showed a Kurdish family from Shtula (sic) returning to Irbil to find their relatives. The TV program upset some Kurdish officials. The reporter tried to interview the Jewish family in question. But they were not ready to comment on the program because they were afraid of being attacked by Jihadist groups in Iraq.

In addition, there have been many reports of a few Jews still living in Baghdad, Irbil and Suleymania, but the Kurdish government does not recognize any Jewish community in the region. Central government has always overriden the Kurdish regional government on Jewish issues. Some politicians think that relations between the state of Israel and the Kurdistan Regional government - there are reports of Israeli contractors working in Kurdistan - have worsened as a result.

The remaining Jews in Kurdistan do not want to abide by Muslim religious rules (religion is passed down by the father). They believe that are Jewish through the maternal line. A few Jews from Kurdistan have contacted the Jewish Agency (with a view to moving to Israel), their 'phone calls having been recorded by the Iraqi telecommunications intelligence office.

Point of No Return adds: although almost the entire Jewish community of 18,000 left for Israel in 1950 - 51, a few mixed Jewish-Muslim families stayed on. After the 1991 Gulf war some of these moved to Israel, but there have since been instances of members of these families moving back to Kurdistan.
 
=========================
Hat tip: Jews of Kurdistan in trouble
http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/07/jews-of-kurdistan-in-trouble.html

Note: I know there are still Jews in Kurdistan and probably in Baghdad, as they have written to me. -- Ami Isseroff

 

Israelische regering stimuleert nog steeds nederzettingen met hypotheken

 
"Kadima" betekent "vooruit", en dat kan op vanalles slaan, zoals: "vooruit met die nederzettingenbouw!" Olmert verkondigde luid en duidelijk dat Israel vooruit moest met het vredesproces, en zo ook Livni. Ze hebben vooral in het laatste jaar van hun regeerperiode naar mijn indruk vrij stevig ingezet op het diplomatieke proces en de vredesonderhandelingen, maar nagelaten om duidelijke stappen te nemen om bijv. de buitenposten te ontruimen of de nederzettingengroei een halt toe te roepen. Dat zal best aan de moeizame coalitieverhoudingen hebben gelegen en aan stropige bureaucratie en aan een bestel waarin - weer naar mijn indruk - veel instanties hun eigen agenda uitvoeren en daar te veel ruimte voor krijgen. Bij Netanjahoe heb ik vooral het idee dat hij zo veel mogelijk op de rem wil trappen als het om concessies doen gaat, net zoals tijdens zijn vorige regering eind jaren '90. Kadima, Bibi, Kadima! De tijd werkt niet echt in jullie voordeel...
 
Wouter
_________________

Gov't still offering settlers incentives
Tovah Lazaroff , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
First-time home buyers can receive a bigger mortgage if they move to settlements such as Itamar and Eilon Moreh than to the city of Ashkelon, according to the Construction and Housing Ministry Web site.

Banks use the ministry's formula to calculate how much money can be lent to a family, based on the number of children, the time the parents spent in the army, their immigration status and the region where the home is located.

This means, for example, that a family of five can receive a mortgage of NIS 244,020 in the Itamar settlement, located southeast of Nablus and some 28 km. over the 1949-1967 armistice line, but in Ashkelon the formula awards the family a mortgage of NIS 223,620.

The additional NIS 20,400 is one of the last vestiges of a system of grants and tax breaks eliminated under prime minister Ariel Sharon, through which the state encouraged people to choose homes in the settlements over those in the center of the country.

But while grants and tax breaks for settlements are no longer available, some settlements remain on the preferential status lists within different ministries. As a result their residents, along with those of any community on the preferential status list, are eligible for a special loan conditions.

Peace Now, in its June report on the 2009-2010 draft state budget, took issue with the practice. Hagit Ofran said a better loan deal for purchasing a home in the settlements was a type of incentive.
She noted that money was set aside in the Construction and Housing Ministry's budget to guarantee the loans.
"It helps people move to settlements," and in this way the government was hindering a two-state solution, Ofran said.

The ministry could not be reached for comment.

It was unclear if the practice of offering larger loans to residents of some settlements would be eliminated after a Knesset Finance Committee vote Sunday to approve the Areas of National Priority Bill, which would drastically broaden the criteria that determine which communities are entitled to the wide away of perks granted under "national priority" status, which until now had been based primarily on their location. Legislation setting forth this criteria will be included in the 2009-2010 economic arrangements bill.

The change has nothing to do with the fact that settlements are still on a number of lists, some of which, such as the one for the Industry, Trade and Labor Ministry, expire this year, but rather with the desire of legislators to change the definition of special-status communities.

It was unclear even to members of the committee and the committee spokesman whether settlements would be included in the list of preferred-status communities under the new criteria.

MK Uri Ariel (National Union) noted that the word "state" was removed from the bill, under the assumption that the list could in fact include settlements in Judea and Samaria.

But Pinchas Wallerstein, who heads the Council of Jewish Communities of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip, said he believed most of the settlements would be written out of the preferential-status lists once they were completed.

Ultimately, the cabinet, not the Finance Committee, will generate the final list, based on the criteria approved as part of the 2009-2010 economic arrangements bill.

Sunday's Finance Committee vote expanded what had been the solely geographic criteria to include other parameters such as the security situation, the socioeconomic status of the community, the preferred distribution of Israel's population and the relative strength of the community in relation to neighboring communities.

In addition, clause six of the law allows for "additional considerations that relate to the population's needs in the area" - a clause that MK Shai Hermesh (Kadima) accuses of "leaving the law wide open to accommodate any community in Israel."

Rather than dividing the more than NIS 700 million budget for enhanced mortgages among the 240 communities on the list, Hermesh said, the new law would allow the government to compose a list including any communities that it wants.

With the Finance Ministry unwilling to raise the budget for the law, Hermesh said that many periphery communities that previously enjoyed national priority benefits would now have to make do with less.

"The government wants freedom of action to reward communities on an individual level," Hermesh said. "This is a law against national priority areas, not one that supports them."

Hermesh said that despite his reservations, he voted in favor of the bill, which is now expected to pass its plenum readings as part of the economic arrangements bill, because if he didn't, the High Court of Justice had threatened to do away with the entire status - a situation, he said, that would lead to the collapse of social services in many periphery towns.

 
Rebecca Anna Stoil contributed to this report.

dinsdag 7 juli 2009

Voor Amerikanen die Jood worden gesubsidiëerde huizen in zonnig land?

 
Dit is het soort onzin dat hier door mensen als Thomas von der Dunk, Dries van Agt, Gretta Duisenberg en Anton van Hooff wordt beweerd, en door vele tientallen reaguurders op de Volkskrant online. Joden worden bevoordeeld, en op kosten van de belastigbetaler in de VS kunnen Joden goedkoop, ja zelfs gratis, wonen in Israel.
 
RP
---------------
 
 
 
A person named Jane Stillwater has posted a fictional rant about Aliya to Israel entitled "New foreclosure remedy: Become Jewish & move to Israel!" The article alleges that American taxpayers pay for the grant that is given by Nefesh beNefesh for new immigrants from North America, that Americans pay for their housing, which is supposedly all in the settlements ("East Jerusalem high rises" and that it is easy to become a Jew and go to Israel at the expense of the American taxpayer. Here's a sample of this wicked concoction:

Our American government is currently financing and maintaining a fabulous all-comprehensive housing program that can provide you with modern newly-constructed state-of-the-art housing at either subsidized prices -- or free!  And talk about location location location.  This wonderful model housing program isn't located in undesirable places like the grungy old Boston inner city or shabby run-down parts of L.A.  And, unlike those tacky bankrupt schools in California and Mississippi, this place has outstanding schools too.  And its healthcare services, shopping centers and freeways are also top-of-the-line.

These fabulous new housing programs are located in a place that is sunny, modern, upscale and family-friendly -- Israel!

According to USA Today, "Nefesh B'Nefesh, a non-profit organization, provides grants of $3,000 to $10,000 as an incentive for Jews to move [to Israel].  Nefesh B'Nefesh, which means 'Soul to Soul,' also helps arrange housing, jobs and schools for immigrants' children."

"But what do I have to do to be eligible for all this wonderful subsidized housing?" you might ask.  That's easy.  Just become Jewish.  And apply.  It's your birthright.  You're in!

"But if America is sponsoring a housing program that is available to only one religious group, isn't that against our Constitution and civil rights?  Doesn't this program have to be available to ALL Americans to be legal?  And doesn't it go against the separation of church and state?"  Nah.  Not a problem.  There are no churches involved.

None of the allegations are true. The United States does not pay for or subsidize housing in the West Bank or East Jerusalem. The United States underwrites loan guarantees for Israel, but it deducts the sum it estimates that Israel spends on settlement in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The U.S. tax payer does not pay for the loans, just the guarantees, which make it possible for Israel to get money at lower interest rates.  The United States government does not pay for Nefesh Benefesh, which is financed by the Israeli government, individual private donors and a foundation. It is rather difficult, as everyone knows to undergo the orthodox conversion that is needed in order to be recognized as a Jew by the orthodox establishment.. This bizarre rant has to be seen to be believed. It shows what happens when the hysteria over settlements is carried to an absurd extreme.  
 
Ami Isseroff
 
 

Journaliste mag niet lachen met vrienden op Gaza strand

 
Vaak wordt gezegd dat Hamas geen islamitische leefregels wil opleggen, maar in de praktijk gebeurt dat wel degelijk.

RP
--------------

The Jerusalem Post
Jul 4, 2009 23:04 | Updated Jul 5, 2009 13:17
'They accused me of laughing in public'
By KHALED ABU TOAMEH
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443716574&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


A Palestinian female journalist complained over the weekend that Hamas policemen attempted to arrest her under the pretext that she came to a Gaza beach dressed immodestly and was seen laughing in public.

The journalist, Asma al-Ghul, said that the policemen instead confiscated her passport. Since the incident, she added, she has been afraid to leave her home, especially after receiving death threats from anonymous callers.

"They accused me of laughing loudly while swimming with my friend and failing to wear a hijab," Ghul told a human rights organization in the Gaza Strip. "They also wanted to know the identity of the people who were with me at the beach and whether they were relatives of mine."

In a phone interview with the Dubai-based Saudi-owned Al-Arabiya news Web site, the journalist said that the policemen who stopped her belonged to the Hamas government's Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice security force.
 
The special force reports directly to the Ministry of Waqf Affairs and is said to be a copy of units that have long been operating in Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.

The Hamas government, according to local reporters, has refrained from publicly admitting that the force exists out of fear of being branded fundamentalist.

The Hamas force consists of dozens of plainclothes police officers who patrol beaches, public gardens, restaurants, hair salons and coffee shops to make sure that males and females are not mixing together and that the women are dressed modestly.

Ghul said that many Palestinian women have noticed the presence of the police officers at the beaches and other sites. She said that the talk in the Gaza Strip these days was about Hamas's intention to impose the hijab on all female school children from first to 12th grade.

She said she was astonished by the fact that the Hamas security forces were providing security to hotels that are frequented by women wearing miniskirts while at the same time targeting "common people" who go to the beaches and public parks.

Ghul said that Hamas has banned men in the Gaza Strip from swimming topless. "And as in my case, Hamas has banned women from laughing while swimming," she added.

She and her friends were stopped by Hamas policemen while swimming in the sea. She said that the policemen confiscated her passport and laptop after accusing her of laughing loudly and appearing in immodest clothes in a public place.

Two of her male friends were detained for questioning for three hours. They said the police officers beat them and abused them verbally before releasing them.

Hamas security commanders initially said that the journalist and her friends were stopped because they were having a mixed party at the beach. Later, one of the commanders said that Ghul was stopped because she was not wearing a hijab while swimming. Another commander claimed that the journalist and her friends were stopped because they had been seeing smoking nargilas and partying in a public place.

Islam Shahwan, spokesman for the Hamas security forces, said that policemen have been deployed at the beaches at the request of the Ministry for Waqf Affairs. He said the policemen's task is to impose law and order and prevent harassment of families picnicking and swimming at the beaches.

"We are there for the safety of the people," he said. "We operate there to prevent men from harassing women. We've received many complaints about these negative practices."

Shahwan said that Hamas does not interfere with the way women want to dress. However, he stressed, "we must preserve our Islamic culture and traditions. If there's a woman who wants to dress as she wishes, she must go to a private swimming pool and not to a public place."
 

Avigdor Lieberman irrelevant geworden als minister BuZa Israel


Dit was te verwachten, en daarom is het zo moeilijk te begrijpen waarom Netanjahoe Lieberman als minister van buitenlandse zaken heeft geaccepteerd. Lieberman is niet de duivel die Israel haters van hem maken, maar hij is erg ontaktvol en ziet niet dat hij niet alleen zijn eigen positie, maar ook zijn eigen land hiermee in gevaar brengt. Overigens vind ik de reacties van Sarkozy en Kouchner ook niet erg diplomatiek. Hopelijk gebeurt er iets waardoor Netanjahoe een excuus heeft hem te ontslaan zodat aan deze tragedie een einde komt.
 
"The Yisrael Beiteinu chairman keeps saying the Foreign Ministry needs to return to its roots and focus on advocacy."
 
Daar heb ik weinig van gemerkt. In reactie op het lijvige en zeer kritische rapport dat Amnesty vorige week uitbracht over de Gaza Oorlog, kwam het ministerie met de voorspelbare reactie dat men te weinig aandacht had voor de duizenden raketten van Hamas. Dat is waar, maar waarom niet ingegaan op de vele concrete beschuldigingen van oorlogsmisdaden en informatie geleverd die een en ander in een ander licht zet? En waarom heeft Israel zich niet wat coöperatiever opgesteld naar Amnesty toe? Het is waar dat Amnesty vaak niet evenwichtig is in haar oordeel over Israel, maar je kunt beter praten en informatie leveren dan de deur dicht slaan.
 
RP
------------

Lieberman has become irrelevant
By Barak Ravid - Haaretz
 
It's been 100 days since Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government was sworn-in, and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman's impact on foreign policy has been negligible. Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak have been handling ties with the U.S.; President Shimon Peres has been in charge of dealing with the Arab world and Lieberman and his office have faded into irrelevance.

Whereas, in the coalition agreement, Lieberman demanded to be made responsible for ties with the U.S., Barak is in fact in charge of negotiations over construction in West Bank settlements. Meanwhile, there's no end in sight to Egypt's and Jordan's boycott of Lieberman. In an effort to fill the void, Peres will travel to Jordan's capital Amman to meet with King Abdullah on Tuesday. And Lieberman? In two weeks' time he will tour Argentina, Brazil, Peru and Colombia to counter Iran's influence in Latin America.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy's critical remarks about Israel's hawkish foreign minister, during his recent meeting with Netanyahu, are just the tip of the iceberg. Many diplomats who have met Lieberman got the feeling that there was no one to talk to and that he has no influence over the Israeli decision-making process.

The fact that Lieberman has left a bad impression is evident from a story he himself told Moscow's Jewish community about his meeting with French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner. Lieberman told his counterpart that the "natural growth" of West Bank settlements required continued construction, citing the shortage of kindergartens in his hometown of Nokdim as an example. Kouchner cynically retorted that faced with a shortage, the children of Nokdim could always attend Palestinian kindergartens. "I'm not sure they have kindergartens," was what Lieberman told his Moscow audience he replied. "And even if they did, our kids wouldn't make it back alive."

The French foreign minister was not amused.

Lieberman's visit to Washington constitutes further evidence of his problematic image. Ahead of his arrival, Israeli diplomats had tried to present him as someone pragmatic and reasonable. When he arrived in the U.S. capital, he was not given an audience with U.S. President Barack Obama - even though Peres, Barak and Netanyahu, who had visited before him, had met with the president. Lieberman's aides said in response that they had not asked to meet with Obama.

But the worst was still to come. His meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was described as a disaster. Clinton was reportedly offended by Lieberman's comments during the press conference and when she later accidently fell and hurt her hand, Washington diplomatic circles joked that "she was pushed down the stairs by Yvet," according to a senior U.S. official, who referred to Lieberman by his nickname.

Surprisingly, none other than Barak has come to Lieberman's aid. He tells every foreign leader he meets that he has to run any policy issue past the foreign minister.

Meanwhile, Lieberman's vision of closer cooperation with Moscow is at an impasse. The Kremlin isn't particularly enthused by the idea and Russia's policies toward Israel have stiffened.

Foreign Ministry officials are trying their utmost to protect Lieberman and say every foreign policy decision is made jointly by him, Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon and the ministry's director general, Yossi Gal. "It's all coordinated," Lieberman's office insists. "Any attempt to portray a different picture is false."

Other Foreign Ministry officials believe Lieberman isn't interested in being involved in every decision the way former foreign minister Tzipi Livni was. "Foreign policy issues just aren't his flesh and blood," they say. "Perhaps he doesn't want the responsibility of making decisions on such charged political issues as the settlements."

The Yisrael Beiteinu chairman keeps saying the Foreign Ministry needs to return to its roots and focus on advocacy. But what exactly does that mean? Last week Lieberman told a joke to Israeli diplomats being sent abroad - it sheds light on his idea of diplomacy. "A tourist went to the Jerusalem Biblical Zoo and saw a lamb and a wolf together in a cage," Lieberman said. "He asked the zoo keeper, 'How do you get a lamb and a wolf to live together peacefully?' The zoo keeper responded: 'We put a new lamb in the cage every morning.'"

Buitenpost Migron heeft nog een jaar tijd


Na veel getouwtrek en mitsen en maren is er een overeenkomst dat de bewoners van de buitenpost Migron binnen een jaar zullen verhuizen naar de nederzetting Adam. Big deal. De vervangende huizen voor de mensen in de buitenposten hadden natuurlijk al lang klaar kunnen zijn, en hadden natuurlijk in Israel zelf gebouwd moeten worden, anders is het een sigaar uit eigen doos. Barak heeft Mitchell beloofd dat de illegale buitenposten binnen weken of hooguit maanden zullen zijn geëvacueerd. Dat klopt dus niet met de overeenkomst die over Migron is bereikt.
 
RP
---------------

'Migron would have one year of grace'
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
The residents of Migron, an illegal outpost in the West Bank, should have a year to voluntarily evacuate, and if they refuse, at the end of that time they should be evacuated by force, the state said during a High Court of Justice hearing Monday.

During the discussion on the illegal outpost, which following a petition submitted by the left-wing Peace Now group, the state's representative said it would take a year until housing units in Adam are ready to absorb the people currently living in Migron.

Attorney Aner Hellman, the state's representative, emphasized that the understanding between the government and the settlers on evacuating Migron voluntarily was an important achievement, but, "If the residents of Migron do not buy the lots which will be ready in a year, there will be no escaping evacuating them by force."

Attorney Michael Sfard, representing Palestinians who say the lands where Migron is built belong to them, said the estimate of a year was optimistic, and that it would take longer until the plan could be implemented.

He further stated that resettling Migron's residents to Adam, a large settlement which is also beyond the Green Line, would harm the basic rights of Palestinian residents.
"It would be better to leave Migron standing than to approve a construction plan in Adam," he said.

Migron residents reacted with fury to the hearing.
"The fate of Judea and Samaria neighborhoods cannot be decided upon in a hearing in this or any other court," they were quoted by Army Radio as saying, adding that they were not prepared to accept any evacuation agreement.

They further stated that "we were sent to this place 10 years ago by the country in order to settle the rocky and empty hill which had never been worked upon, and we didn't expel any people from their land."

Ben-Eliezer ziet Obama als kans voor vredesakkoord met Palestijnen


Ook dit is een geluid uit de volgens Martijn van Dam 'ultrarechtse' Israelische regering.
 
RP
-------------

'US appeasement toward Iran is worrying'
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
In the first Israeli response to North Korea's belligerent test-launching of missiles over the weekend, Industry Trade and Labor Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer said Saturday he was "very troubled by the American reaction to North Korea's actions," adding he was "not at all calm regarding the American appeasement towards Iran."

Ben-Eliezer was speaking in a casual cultural event in Ramat Gan and his statements did not constitute the official position of the government.

"As far as I'm concerned, the estimates regarding the date that Iran will have nuclear weapons do not matter. For me, an Iranian nuclear bomb is a fait accompli but the world continues to play a double game with Iran, with statements and UN resolutions by day and more than 1,000 European companies still trading with Iran by night. [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad sees through the West's weakness and giggles when he knows everyone needs Iranian oil and money," Ben-Eliezer said.

Tying the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to Iran, Ben-Eliezer said that the Iranian nuclear threat had created a shared interest between Israel, the United States and the moderate states of the Arab world. "Stopping Iran's nuclearization," he said, "is a main issue for us, the Americans and the moderate Arab world. We must take this opportunity and lead towards separation from the Palestinians and immediate resumption of negotiations. We must move towards a solution as fast as we can, with sponsorship and involvement by Arab leaders. We have been in the territories for 42 years and our situation is worsening by the day. We must sit and reach a diplomatic solution. As a former defense minister and current member of the cabinet I say - Israel is one of the strongest countries I know. We should work towards an agreement and not be afraid."

He said Israel must never cut a deal with the Palestinians only in the West Bank, rather than tying it to the Gaza Strip. "Otherwise," he said, "we will have three states for two peoples. I safely say that when the moderate Arab world, led by Egypt, knows we are serious and determined and indeed plan to take the course of diplomacy - they will cooperate with us and give their full backing to our diplomatic actions."

Ben-Eliezer also spoke of Israel's relations with the United States following the election of US President Barack Obama. "He's no [George W.] Bush and no [Bill] Clinton, but he's certainly not a [Jimmy] Carter. He sees the world differently and I think maybe this is a chance for us to overcome psychological hang-ups and 'flow' with the diplomacy he leads. Israel is in agreement and understanding with the Americans, [and has] strategic understandings I cannot imagine living without. A strong Israel is also an American interest, but strengthening settlements is not. I look at the full half of the glass - let's leverage US pressure for our benefit. Maybe in five years we will be able to say we gave a great present to our children and grandchildren."

VS dwingt Israelische concurrent uit competitie voor gevechtsvliegtuigen te stappen


Sympathisanten van de Palestijnen halen altijd graag de miljarden aan die Israel van de VS ontvangt, maar vergeten dat daaraan allerlei voorwaarden zijn verbonden die gunstig zijn voor de VS, en die Israels wapenindustrie steeds afhankelijker van de VS hebben gemaakt. Ondertussen wordt Israel geregeld gedwongen zich uit deals terug te trekken omdat dit 'slecht is voor de relatie met de VS.' Het is vreemd en tegenstrijdig met het principe van nationale soevereiniteit dat Israel niet op eigen gelegenheid met bondgenoten van de VS deals op defensiegebied kan sluiten.
 
RP
-------------


IAF forced out of Indian fighter jet bid
Yaakov Katz , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
Under pressure from the Pentagon, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) has been forced to back out of a joint partnership with a Swedish aerospace company to compete in a multi-billion dollar tender to sell new multi-role fighter jets to the Indian Air Force.

The deal, estimated at a whopping $12 billion for over 120 new aircraft, is being fought over by Lockheed Martin's F-16, Boeing's F-18/Hornet, Russia's MiG-35 and BAE's Eurofighter. IAI was asked by Saab, manufacturer of the Gripen, to jointly develop an advanced model which would compete for the deal.

The Defense Ministry ordered IAI to back out of the deal after the Pentagon expressed concern that American technology, used by Israel, would be integrated into the Gripen offered to the Indians.

"The stated concern was that Western technology in Israeli hands would make its way to the Indians," one Israeli official said.

What was strange with the American request was that Boeing and Lockheed Martin - the two largest US defense contractors - are also competing for the Indian deal. For this reason, Israeli officials said it was more likely that the Americans were concerned that if IAI competed for the deal with Saab, it would force the American companies to lower their prices.

A multi-role fighter, the Gripen is in service in Sweden, the Czech Republic, Hungary and South Africa. IAI was supposed to provide the electronic systems - radar, communications and electronic-warfare - for the plane.

This is not the first time that an Israeli company has been forced out of a deal due to concerns that competing with American companies would endanger Israeli-US relations.

Last summer, the MoD ordered Israel Military Industries (IMI) to back down from submitting a bid for a half-a-billion dollar deal to develop and manufacture a new tank for the Turkish Armed Forces.

At the time, Turkey had informed the MoD of its interest in developing a new tank and asked if IMI would want to submit a bid. SIBAT - the MOD's Foreign Defense Assistance and Defense Export Organization - decided not to submit an Israeli offer so not to compete with the Americans and endanger Israeli-US defense relations.

maandag 6 juli 2009

Israël, Hamas en het leren van fouten (Nederlands Dagblad)


Hieronder een genuanceerd opiniestuk van Jan van Benthem, redacteur bij het christelijke Nederlands Dagblad.
 
Ik heb zelf het rapport van Amnesty gelezen, en vind het eerlijk gezegd nogal eenzijdig. De veroordeling van Hamas is in veel mildere bewoordingen dan die van Israel gesteld, bovendien beschuldigt men Israel ervan expres en zonder enig militair doel op burgers te schieten en huizen en andere gebouwen te hebben gebombardeerd, iets wat zeer moeilijk hard te maken is, vooral zonder gedetailleerde informatie van Israels kant.
 
Het rapport geeft verder absoluut geen context voor de oorlog en haar oorzaken, en de grootschalige wapensmokkel en duizenden raketten van de afgelopen jaren, de vele (pogingen tot) aanslagen en de ontvoering van Shalit blijven alle onvermeld. Het rapport is grotendeels gebaseerd op aangrijpende ooggetuigenverslagen over Israelische wreedheden, zonder dat Amnesty enige afstand van deze bronnen neemt, of enig vraagteken zet. Het is niet meer te controleren of alles ook precies zo gebeurd is, want, hoe cynisch dat misschien ook klinkt, ooggetuigenverslagen kloppen niet altijd 100% zoals ze zijn verteld.
 
Ook wat betreft het aantal slachtoffers en het aantal burgers onder hen baseert Amnesty zich op Palestijnse bronnen. Het is verkeerd en vooral ook vreselijk stom dat Israel niet heeft meegewerkt met het onderzoek en vragen van Amnesty niet heeft beantwoord, maar dat geeft Amnesty niet het recht op grond van Palestijnse bronnen Israel van de meeste verschrikkelijke oorlogsmisdaden te beschuldigen, op te roepen tot een wapenembargo en tot vervolging van verschillende Israelische militairen en politici.
 
RP
--------------
 
Israël, Hamas en het leren van fouten
Geplaatst: 04 juli 2009 06:13, laatste wijziging: 03 juli 2009 20:15
door Jan van Benthem
 
 
Drie dingen heeft Amnesty International bereikt met zijn rapport over de Gazaoorlog.

Laten we bij het begin beginnen: het Israëlische leger is het meest morele leger ter wereld en de zaak van Hamas is de meest rechtvaardige van alle volken. Zeggen ze zelf. En ze zijn zo overtuigd van hun zaak dat of nu de VN of Human Rights Watch of zoals deze week Amnesty International een rapport uitbrengt waarin wordt gesproken over 'oorlogsmisdaden', het protest uit zowel Tel Aviv als de Gazastrook zo hevig is dat de argumenten uit deze rapporten niet tot hen doordringen.

Precies dat onderstreept waarom die rapporten er zijn gekomen. Want het gaat daarin over de vraag, hoe er met het leven van anderen is omgesprongen. Roekeloos en onverschillig, is de herhaalde conclusie.

En dat mag geen enkele regering of beweging negeren, door bij voorbaat luid te protesteren. Alleen door de eigen fouten onder ogen te zien, kan daar lering uit worden getrokken en herhaling worden voorkomen.

Heilig doel
Nu zijn de in de eerste regel geciteerde aannames meteen fikse blokkades. Wie zichzelf beschouwt als de beste of denkt te strijden voor een heilig doel, heeft niet direct de neiging te luisteren naar kritiek op het eigen handelen.

Toch is er wel een essentieel verschil dat ook weer uit het Amnestyrapport van deze week [blijkt]. Israël heeft in het geval van de Gazaoorlog gehandeld uit verdediging tegen de duizenden Qassamraketten die uit de Gazastrook zijn afgevuurd. Dat is niet alleen een recht van een regering, het is zelfs een plicht om de eigen burgers te beschermen.

Hamas en andere gewapende Palestijnse groepen, zoals Amnesty ze noemt, schenden volgens Amnesty per definitie al het internationale recht door het afvuren van Qassamraketten op burgerdoelen in Israël. ,,Iedere raket is potentieel dodelijk en de intensieve barrage van zulke raketten veroorzaakte paniek onder de burgerbevolking van Zuid-Israël. Duizenden gezinnen vluchtten naar andere delen van het land en wie wel bleef moest iedere keer hollen om dekking te zoeken als het alarm waarschuwde voor een naderende raket''. Hamas en zijn soortgenoten kreeg ook de volle laag als het gaat om het gedrag in de Gazastrook zelf door midden tussen de burgers aanvallen op Israëlische doelen te plegen.

Dat Hamas hier lering uit zal trekken is volstrekt onwaarschijnlijk. De terreurbeweging ziet de eigen strijd als een heilige jihad en mochten burgers daar het slachtoffer van worden, wel, dan zijn dat martelaren die Allah wel rijk zal belonen. Deze houding is in de Arabische pers vorige maand fel veroordeeld, waarbij Hamas verantwoordelijk werd gesteld voor iedere druppel bloed die in de Gazastrook is vergoten. ,,De waarheid is dat de leiders van Hamas als enigen verantwoordelijk zijn voor het bloedbad in Gaza. Zij alleen waren de heersers in Gaza, zij besloten de de-escalatie te beëindigen, wat het begin van een oorlog met Israël betekende.''

Er is overal over gesproken en zowel Hamas als Israël roepen om het hardst dat het rapport 'ongebalanceerd en oneerlijk is' (Hamas) en 'geen verband houdt met de werkelijkheid' (Israël). Maar omwille van de verloren levens van honderden burgers moet er naar geluisterd worden.

Aan de kant schuiven
Betekent dit nu dat Israël het Amnestyrapport dus aan de kant kan schuiven omdat het toch allemaal de schuld van Hamas is? De reactie uit Tel Aviv duidt daar wel op. Een van de meest inhoudelijke argumenten is dat Amnesty heeft verzuimd Hamas te betitelen als een terroristische beweging maar het omschreef als een 'bewapende groep'. Bovendien zouden veel van de feiten die Amnesty naar voren brengt niet kloppen. ,,De getuigen in het rapport zijn betrokkenen en staan onder druk van Hamas, zoals is aangetoond door onafhankelijke onderzoeken in de internationale media'', aldus het Israëlische ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken in een reactie. Die 'internationale media' zullen wel verbaasd hebben opgekeken: tot nu toe werden zij door Israël juist beticht van een bevooroordeelde eenzijdigheid en nu hebben ze ineens het gelijk van Israël bevestigd?

In sommige gevallen is dit wel het geval. Eerdere berichten als zou Israël een VN-school doelbewust hebben beschoten zijn inderdaad ontzenuwd door nauwkeurig onderzoek van 'de media'. Er wordt nauwkeurig gelet op evenwichtigheid in de berichtgeving over Israël en de Palestijnen, soms zelfs door een speciale commissie zoals de BBC voor heeft ingesteld, soms door een ombudsman als bij de NOS. Ook nu is bijvoorbeeld op Radio1 het bericht over het Amnnestyrapport bijna per woord gewogen: evenveel voor de volgens Amnesty door het Israëlische leger begane oorlogsmisdaden als voor die van Hamas.

Het zou erg wenselijk zijn als Israël dat zelf ook deed. Want hoewel de acties in de Gazastrook tegen de voordurende rakettenregen in beginsel terecht waren, zijn er bij de uitvoering wel honderden burgers omgekomen. Dat de cijfers daarover bij Amnesty sterk verschillen van die van Israël heeft onder meer te maken met de vraag, hoe bijvoorbeeld agenten in opleiding van de Hamas burgerwacht worden gezien - als terroristen want verbonden aan Hamas als Israël doet of primair als burgers.

Maar los van dit soort verschillen zijn er wel naar schatting driehonderd kinderen en ruim honderd vrouwen omgekomen door Israëlische kogels, granaten, raketten of bommen. Israël zegt voortdurend er alles aan te doen dit te voorkomen en dat deze slachtoffers vooral worden veroorzaakt door het feit dat Hamas tussen de burgers opereert. Amnesty wijst er daartegenover op dat veel van de slachtoffers zijn gevallen door precisiewapens waarbij degenen die ze gebruikten het kennelijk voor lief namen dat er ook burgers of zelfs soms alleen burgers door zouden omkomen, eenzelfde conclusie als die van een VN-onderzoekscommissie twee maand geleden.

'Recht - niets mee te maken'
Is het onachtzaamheid geweest, of speelde er meer? Israël zelf zegt dat zijn leger uiterst nauwkeurig heeft gehandeld en er alles aan heeft gedaan om volgens internbationaal recht te handelen. Maar een persoonlijk gesprek met een oudere kolonel, die recht en moraal altijd hoog heeft, aan het begin van de acties in de Gazastrook duidde toen al op iets anders. ,,Kom niet bij me aan met dat internationaal recht'', zei hij toen, ,,daar hebben we niets mee te maken. Waar was dat toen Hamas al die duizenden raketten op ons afschoot? Wie protesteerde toen? We gaan nu met ze afrekenen, op onze manier.''

Een manier die te vaak is ontspoort, zegt Amnesty nu. Israël wilde niet meewerken aan het rapport, wil er ook nu eigenlijk geen kennis van nemen, wil ook niet meewerken met de onafhankelijke onderzoekscommissie die de Raad voor de Mensenrechten van de VN heeft ingesteld en wordt geleid door rechter Richard Goldstone. Het zou dat ondanks alle kritiek die het op deze onderzoeken heeft toch wel moeten doen. Het vergroot de eigen geloofwaardigheid en het geeft de kans er lessen uit te leren. Want Hamas bereidt zich voor op het volgende conflict. De tunnels bij Rafah werken al weer volop, nu zelfs tot zestig meter diep onder de grond zoals de Jerusalem Post gisteren berichtte. Hoe omvangrijk het goederen en wapentransport door die tunnels is, kan worden afgeleid uit een schatting van de zender Al-Arabiya, die er onderzoek naar heeft gedaan en tot een aantal van achthonderd tunnels komt. Zo'n enorm netwerk valt door bombardementen vrijwel niet meer uit te schakelen, citeert de JP een hoge Israëlische officier. Kortom, er moet worden nagedacht over nieuwe tactieken. En omwille van het leven van die omgekomen kinderen en hun moeders: léés daarbij wat er in de eerste Gazaoorlog is fout gegaan.

 

Religieuze leider PA verkondigt antisemitische leugens


Dit soort opruiing en geschiedvervalsing is schering en inslag binnen de 'gematigde' Palestijnse Autoriteit van Machmoud Abbas, en is net zo'n groot obstakel voor de vrede als de voortgaande bouw in de nederzettingen. Toch hoor je er zelden over buiten 'zionistische' kringen; de media negeren het, Obama negeert het, de EU negeert het, de VN en Amnesty International negeren het, en al die zogenaamde vredesactivisten negeren het ook. Toch is de verspreiding van haat vaak een effectieve manier om volken tegen elkaar op te zetten en leidt het meestal tot geweld.
 
RP
-----------------

Bulletin July 5, 2009 - Palestinian Media Watch
Senior PA religious official repeats incendiary lies and libels about Israel, Jews and Jewish history
by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik


In a single TV interview, one of the Palestinian Authority's most senior religious officials has reiterated several of the many fundamental lies, libels and defamations about Israel, Jews and Jewish history that play a central role in PA ideology and hate propaganda. Tayseer Tamimi, the PA's Chief Religious Justice, regularly appears as a religious authority in the official PA media and at public events.

In this recent interview, Tamimi teaches that the Quran says that Jews have inherently negative traits and have been evil throughout history; that Jerusalem has no Jewish holy sites; that Israel is destroying the foundation of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, which is now "hanging in midair;" that Orthodox Jews deny the Western Wall is part of the Jewish Temple; and that Jesus was not a Jew but a Palestinian.
 
Tamimi's recent libels, lies and defamations, PATV (Fatah), June 9, 2009:

#1. The Quran says Jews have inherently negative characteristics
#2. Jews have no connection to Jerusalem
#3. Israel is acting to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque
#4. Orthodox Jews deny the Western Wall is part of the Temple
#5. Jesus was not a Jew but a Palestinian prophet of Islam

==========

#1. The Quran says Jews have inherently negative characteristics
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DnL-X8fCH4

Tayseer Tamimi, PA Chief Religious Justice:
"Concerning the Jews, the Holy Quran says that they lack understanding, are void of wisdom, know nothing, violate agreements, etc. However, the Jews were known - it was known about them throughout history- that they make false claims, lies, forgery, slander, and fabrications, in order to justify their aggression, land theft, defilement of holy sites, appropriation of land, destruction of homes, murder of children, women, and the elderly."

#2. Jews have no connection to Jerusalem
www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xO6AiYMxe4

Tayseer Tamimi, PA Chief Religious Justice:
"I know of Muslim and Christian holy sites in [Jerusalem]. I don't know of any Jewish holy sites in it... Israel has been excavating since 1967 in search of remains of their Temple or their fictitious Jewish history."

#3. Israel is acting to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque
www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_WA6uWWKqs

Tayseer Tamimi, PA Chief Religious Justice:
"The [Israeli] excavations' purpose is to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque. In fact, its foundations have been removed. Chemical acids were injected into the rocks to dissolve them. The soil and the pillars [were moved] so the mosque is hanging in midair. There is an Israeli plan to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque and to build the Temple."

#4. Orthodox Jews deny the Western Wall is part of the Temple
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BySsBVrbaDs

Tayseer Tamimi, PA Chief Religious Justice:
"When the Prophet [Muhammad] entered Jerusalem, after landing with his 'riding animal' in the Night Journey from Mecca to Jerusalem, he tied it to the western wall, which is known today [by Muslims] as the al-Buraq Wall, and which the Jews usurped by falsification and deception [saying it is the Western Wall of the Temple]. Orthodox Jewish groups, such as Neturei Karta, denounce all the actions of the Israeli government and the Zionist movement in Jerusalem. They, more than us, say these claims are false and a distortion of the Jewish faith."

#5. Jesus was not a Jew but a Palestinian prophet of Islam
www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGoDhj7nRwU

Archbishop Atallah Hanna (speaking humorously): "We [Christians] are local stock, 100% Palestinian and Arab produce."
Tayseer Tamimi, PA Chief Religious Justice: "Jesus is the only Palestinian prophet."

====================
Palestinian Media Watch:
p:+972 2 625 4140 e:
pmw@pmw.org.il
f: +972 2 624 2803 w: www.pmw.org.il
 

Palestijnse Autoriteit neemt wapens en explosieven van Hamas in beslag

 
Meer aanwijzingen dat Hamas probeert om een coup te plegen op de Westoever. Eerder al bleek dat Hamas probeerde aanslagen op PA functionarissen te plegen.
Het feit dat Fatah, en niet Israel, deze coup en aanslagen verijdelt is een goed teken, maar de vraag is wel of Fatah daar zonder Israelische aanwezigheid op de Westoever toe in staat was geweest.

RP
------------

PA: Arms, explosives and cash seized from Hamas
Date: 05 / 07 / 2009  Time:  11:56
www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=39031


Nablus - Ma'an Exclusive - The Palestinian Authority has in recent months seized arms, explosives and millions of dollars in cash from Hamas, a PA official said on Sunday.

The official, security forces spokesperson Adnan Ad-Damiry, told Ma'an that its West Bank officers have discovered "large amounts of explosives and bombs in the districts of Nablus, Hebron and Qalqiliya."

He also alleged that Hamas intended to use the weapons "heinously" against PA forces.

"PA forces discovered apartments, which Hamas purchased to use as operating centers between the West Bank and Gaza Strip to implement orders to kidnap officials," he said, adding that the movement intended to "implement other plans that threaten Palestinian security and safety."

The official claimed the Fatah-allied PA had also "seized large amounts of money [8.5 million US dollars] entering the Palestinian territories illegally," cash he said would be used to maintain Hamas' own military forces in the West Bank.

Ad-Damiry also dismissed the frequent Hamas accusations that PA forces participate in politically motivated arrest campaigns, saying that "if a tsunami hit the West Bank, Hamas would accuse the PA of being responsible for it." He said PA forces only arrest Hamas affiliates on suspicion of smuggling weapons or money.

"We will continue our work until Hamas stops planning and implementing its coup" in the West Bank, "as it did in the Gaza Strip," the spokesperson insisted, calling the PA's ongoing operations against the Islamic movement a "duty to fight all illegal phenomena and maintain Palestinians' security and safety."

Meanwhile, Palestinian Authority security forces detained four Hamas affiliates in the West Bank on Saturday evening, according to the Islamic movement.

In a statement received by Ma'an, Hamas said that the detentions took place in Qalqiliya, Tulkarem and Nablus, pointing out that a woman was also among those arrested.

Hamas accused PA forces of detaining and torturing women in the West Bank, calling on the PA to release the women at a minimum, and to put an end to the issue of political arrests once and for all.

A Hamas spokesperson called on human rights organizations, Egyptian officials and party leaders to halt this "manipulation of the Palestinians' fate," and urged relevant parties to expose "the truth of the detaining of women and political arrests in the West Bank."

Geinfiltreerde terrorist uit Gazastrook opgepakt


Israel verijdelt nog geregeld aanslagen en verhindert de opbouw van nieuwe terroristische cellen op de Westelijke Jordaanoever.

RP
-------------

Terrorist Infiltrator from Gaza Arrested and Charged

(Communicated by the Prime Minister's Office)
 
 
In a joint Israel Security Agency-Israel Police operation, Abd El-Rahman Talalkeh, was arrested in the Negev, in the early morning hours of 1.6.09, after having left the Gaza Strip and infiltrated into Israel via the Sinai Peninsula.  He admitted to having undergone extensive military training in the Gaza Strip, on behalf of the Popular Resistance Committees, in order to establish a terrorism infrastructure inside Israel.  The aforesaid training included small arms; preparing various chemicals, car-bombs, explosive belts and bags; the use of explosives; use of GPS devices; map-reading; and intelligence gathering.
 
Talalkeh, born in 1984 and a resident the Nuseirat refugee camp in Gaza, was dispatched to Israel in order to recruit terrorists and establish a terrorism infrastructure in Judea and Samaria in order to perpetrate various attacks including suicide attacks and the abduction and murder of soldiers in order to use them as bargaining chips.
 
Talalkeh was indicted today (Sunday), 5.7.09, in Be'er Sheva Magistrates Court.
 
 

zondag 5 juli 2009

Mensenrechten op de Westoever: Hoe de Palestijnen te helpen

 
De prijs van de relatieve rust en veiligheid op de Westelijke Jordaanoever is een soms bruut en willekeurig optredend politieapparaat dat ook de persvrijheid beknot en onschuldige slachtoffers maakt. Hervorming en samenvoeging van de vele veiligheidsdiensten van de PA staat al jaren op het verlanglijstje van de sponsors, maar men durft blijkbaar niet te dreigen om de geldkraan dicht te draaien als er niets verbetert. Wellicht is er de afgelopen jaren ook wel wat verbeterd, je leest er weinig over, of is beter niet haalbaar in die situatie en omgeving? De Arabische buurlanden doen het doorgaans ook niet beter, dus het ligt beslist niet alleen aan de Israëlische bezetting die zo makkelijk van alles de schuld krijgt.
 
Wouter
________________
 
How To Help the Palestinians
by Khaled Abu Toameh
Wednesday, Jul. 01, 2009 at 10:36 AM
 
 
The leaders of the Palestinian Authority do not want the international community to hear anything about massive abuse of human rights and intimidation of journalists that its security forces are practicing almost on a daily basis in the West Bank.

They do not want the world to see that, with the help of the Americans and some Europeans, they are building more prisons and security forces than hospitals and housing projects for the needy.

They want the US and the rest of the world to continue believing that peace will prevail tomorrow morning only if Israel stops construction in the settlements and removes a number of empty caravans from remote and isolated hilltops in the West Bank.

The Palestinians do not need a dictatorship that harasses and terrorizes journalists, and that is responsible for the death of detainees in its prisons. In the Arab world we already have enough dictatorships.

The Palestinians do not need additional security forces, militias and armed gangs. In fact, there are too many of them, both in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

American and European taxpayers' money should be invested in building hospitals, schools and housing projects. Investing billions of dollars in training thousands of policemen and establishing new security forces and prisons will not advance the cause of peace and coexistence.

There is no doubt that many Palestinians would love to abandon the culture of uniform and weapons in favor of improved infrastructure and medical care.

As for the international media, it's time to abandon the policy of double standards in covering the Israeli-Arab conflict. For many years, the mainstream media in the US and Europe turned a blind eye to stories about financial corruption under Yasser Arafat. The result was that Arafat and his cronies got away with stealing billions of dollars that had been donated to the Palestinians by the Americans and Europeans.

Back then, many foreign journalists said they believed that the stories about financial corruption in the Palestinian areas were "Zionist propaganda." Other journalists said they would rather file an anti-Israel story because this way they would become more popular with their editors and publishers.

Recently, a Palestinian TV crew was stopped at a checkpoint in the West Bank, where soldiers confiscated a tape and erased its content.

This incident, hardly received any coverage in the mainstream media in the US and Europe.

The reason? The perpetrators were not IDF soldiers, but Palestinian Authority security officers. And the checkpoint did not belong to the IDF; it was, in fact, a Palestinian checkpoint.

The story of the detention of the TV crew -- which, by the way, belonged to Al-Jazeera and the erasure of the footage did not make it to the mainstream media even after Reporters Without Borders, an organization that defends journalists worldwide, issued a statement strongly condemning the assault on the freedom of the media.

"Journalists must be able to work freely," Reporters Without Borders said. "The erasure of this video footage proves that the Palestinian security forces try to cover up their human rights violations. This incident should be the subject of an enquiry by the Palestinian Authority."

Walid Omari, the head of the Qatar-based satellite TV station's operations in the West Bank, told Reporters Without Borders that his crew was preparing a report on the death of a detainee at the Palestinian Authority detention center in Hebron that might have been the result of torture.

"We were the only ones to investigate this case and we did it despite strong pressure from the Palestinian Authority," Omari said.

Al Jazeera's Hebron correspondent went with a cameraman to the victim's home in the village of Dura, where they interviewed the family and filmed the body.

As they were returning to Hebron in a vehicle displaying the word "Press," they were detained by Palestinian Authority security forces at a checkpoint and taken to a police station, where the video footage they had just recorded was erased. They were allowed to go after an hour.

One can only imagine the international media's reaction had the TV crew been detained by Israeli security forces. Anti-Israel groups and individuals would have cited the incident as further proof of the "occupation's brutal measures" against the freedom of the media.

Moreover, it is highly likely that Israeli human rights organizations like Betselem would have dispatched researchers to the field to investigate the incident had IDF soldiers been involved.

Yet foreign journalists and human rights activists working in Israel and the Palestinian territories either chose to ignore the story or never heard about it simply because it was lacking in an anti-Israel angle.

One can also imagine how the media and human rights organizations would have reacted had a Palestinian died in Israeli prison after allegedly being tortured.

Haitham Amr, a male nurse, was detained by the Palestinian Authority's US-backed and trained General Intelligence Force on suspicion of being affiliated with Hamas. He was one of more than 700 Palestinians who are being held without trial in West Bank prisons that are run by security forces loyal to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.

These security forces, which are being referred to by many Palestinians as the Dayton Forces [a reference to ret. US general and security coordinator Keith Dayton], claimed that Amr was killed after he jumped from the second floor of a building where he was being held in Hebron. The family and human rights organizations insist that Amr died as a result of severe torture.

If the Palestinian Authority really had nothing to fear, why did it send its police officers to detain the TV crew and confiscate the tape? Is the Palestinian Authority trying to hide something?

True, Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salaam Fayad hold more moderate views than Hamas's Ismail Haniyeh and Khaled Mashaal.

But Abbas and Fayad do not enjoy enough credibility among their own people, largely due to their open ties with Israel and the West. The security and financial support that the Americans and Europeans are giving to the Palestinian Authority is nothing but a bear hug.

That is perhaps why they chose to ignore the story about the male nurse whose family says was tortured to death by security officers who receive their salaries from US and European taxpayers' money.

 

Israel overweegt verzachten Gaza blokkade om Shalit vrij te krijgen

 
Ik vind het niet gerechtvaardigd om de hele bevolking van de Gazastrook onder druk te zetten door de levering van etenswaren, kleding en allerlei gebruiksvoorwerpen te beperken vanwege de gijzeling van één soldaat. Anderzijds IS Gaza een vijandig gebied waarmee Israel op voet van oorlog verkeerd en wiens regime haar vernietiging nastreeft. Juist de apologeten die beweren dat Hamas de legitieme, gekozen regering van deze Palestijnen is, hebben geen recht van klagen: deze democratische regering hoeft alleen één soldaat vrij te laten -in ruil voor vele Palestijnse gevangenen- om het lijden van haar onderdanen aanzienlijk te verzachten.
 
Wouter
_____________
 
 
Last update - 08:03 04/07/2009
Report: Israel mulling easing Gaza siege
By The Associated Press 
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1097645.html


The Defense Ministry has recommended a partial lifting of the embargo on the Gaza Strip as a goodwill gesture toward the Palestinians to spur talks to free a long-held captive soldier, Israeli media reported Friday.

Israel has been linking the opening of Gaza's borders to the release of abducted Israel Defense Forces soldier Gilad Shalit, who has been held by Hamas militants for more than three years. Hamas has been pushing for a deal to trade him for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners currently held in Israeli jails.

Israel imposed a near-total embargo of the Gaza Strip in 2007 after Hamas militants violently took control of the territory.

According to the new plan, reported by the news Web site Ynet, Israel would increase supplies of coffee, tea, soup, meat, fish and canned goods into Gaza ahead of the holy Muslim month of Ramadan, which begins in August, to promote a deal for Shalit.

Israel would also renew shipments of fuel, clothing, kitchenware and egg-laying chickens as part of the package.

Ynet reported that the proposal had been drafted by defense officials and awaits the approval of Defense Minister Ehud Barak.

The Defense Ministry would not officially comment on the report.

Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh said Friday that if there was any truth to the report, it would represent a righting of a previous wrong.

"The Palestinian people have one single, clear demand - the siege must be lifted and all the crossings have to be open and life to get back to normal in the Gaza Strip," he told reporters outside a Gaza mosque after Friday prayers.

The idea behind the plan, according to Ynet, was to lift the embargo gradually and link it to progress on Egyptian-mediated talks aimed at releasing Shalit from captivity. The plan does not include transferring products such as steel and concrete, which are needed to rebuild the battered territory but could also help Hamas improve its military capabilities.

Hamas and other militants have fired thousands of missiles at Israeli border towns and communities in recent years.

Israel has come under heavy pressure from the international community - including the Obama administration - to lift its embargo, which has crippled the Gaza economy. Gaza has survived largely thanks to a booming underground smuggling trade between Gaza and Egypt.
 
 

zaterdag 4 juli 2009

PA verhinderde Hamas aanslag op Abbas

 
De PA lijkt de veiligheidssituatie op de Westoever steeds beter onder controle te hebben, en Hamas 'activisten' voelen zich schijnbaar in het nauw gedreven.
Is Haaretz politiek correct? In 'mijn tijd' gingen aktivisten de straat op met folders, affiches en spandoeken, of blokkeerden wel eens een toegangsweg voor onze tegenstanders. Staken was ook nog een optie. Een wapen en een foto van mijn doelwit heb ik nooit op zak gehad...
 
Wouter
 
____________

PA: Arrested Hamas activists planned to assassinate Abbas
By Avi Issacharoff - Haaretz
Last update - 03:21 03/07/2009
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1097504.html

 
Hamas activists arrested by the Palestinian Authority have admitted to tracking the movements of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and to gathering intelligence on his security, PA sources told Haaretz.

Their motive clearly was to assassinate Abbas, the sources said.

"Hamas' intention was to scuttle the reconciliation talks [between Hamas and Fatah] in Cairo and to create chaos in the West Bank, in contrast to the sense of security that has characterized the territory for the past two years," Fatah spokesman Fahmi Zarir told Haaretz.

Palestinian Authority Secretary Taib Abd-Arahim had said Monday amid the Cairo talks that Palestinian security forces had arrested 10 Hamas members planning to attack PA institutions. The detainees admitted they were planning to assassinate several senior Palestinian Authority officials on July 1, in order to halt the conciliation talks, he said.

Now, new details have now emerged about the plot: The Hamas activists were caught with weapons, maps and photos of senior Palestinian officers. The photos and maps indicated the cell was conducting surveillance on Abbas himself.

Sources say Palestinian security forces have detailed confessions in which the suspects acknowledged planning to assassinate several PA officials and stated they were observing Abbas' movements. PA sources say their motive was clear: to assassinate Abbas. The cell had three to five members, between the ages of 25 and 30.

A spokesman for Hamas' military wing has denied the allegations. However, if they are true, this is evidence not only of Hamas' intention to scuttle reconciliation with Fatah, but also to stage a coup of sorts against the Palestinian Authority. Reports suggest Hamas' military wing has an extremist agenda, but Hamas' political leadership in the west bank is thought not to have been aware of the plot.