woensdag 10 december 2008

Syrië heeft iets te verbergen

 
Syrië is al decennia lang een repressieve dictatuur waar duizenden dissidenten in donkere kerkers verdwijnen.
 
Sunday, 30 November 2008, 02:09
Nir Boms & David Keyes

 
A British Ambassador in Teheran once explained the logic of the Middle East as follows: "What I say does not definitely reflect what I think. What I do does not necessary reflect what I say. Therefore, not everything that I do necessary contradicts everything that I think. "This twisted logic may help explain the latest sequence of events in Syria and the apparent gap between the regime's words and deeds.  Despite softening rhetoric and occasional signs of rapprochement with the West, President Bashar al-Assad still has a lot to hide—and fear.
 
On the one hand, Syria appears to be taking its time. Last September it took the government over a week to admit that its "air defense systems confronted Israeli aircraft."  This announcement followed a flurry of reports about an Israeli strike that destroyed a suspected nuclear site.  The Syrians, naturally, denied these "western" reports but they also refused to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to conduct a follow up visit, this despite the recently published report confirming the presence of uranium at the site.  It took Syria another whole week to admit the assassination of General Mohammed Suleiman, a top Assad adviser and a key player in the Lebanese arena. The regime stayed mum regarding the abduction of Kurdish leader Meshaal Tammo too.  Lastly, Syria has yet to officially comment on the mysterious assassination of Hamas leader Khaled Mashall's top aid, Hisham el-Badni, who was taken out of his car and shot in the city of Homs earlier this month.
 
In contrast to this foot-dragging, Syria has been all too quick at repressing dissent.  Twelve more names were recently added to Syria's already long list of political prisoners.  Journalists Jabr al-Shoufiand and Fayez Sarah, Democratic Party member Muhammed Haji Darwish and  former independent member of parliament Riad Seif  were among those sentenced to two and a half years in prison for "spreading false information and belonging to a secret organization promoting sectarian strife." These convictions follow a wave of arrests against figures such as Ghazi Omar Qaddour, member of the Syrian Council of Freedom and Human Rights Committees and Habib Saleh, author and opposition figure.   Many of those targeted by the regime are associated with the 2005 Damacus Decleration, which calls for "democratic and radical change" in Syria.
 
Even as these arrests occur, Assad has dispatched "unofficial" emissaries to Washington to help convince the Americans that Syria is serious about peace.  Such lobbying is to be expected, but is this a genuine move toward reconciliation or is it part of a more nefarious plot?  Talking peace while banning basic liberties is an old Middle Eastern game with all too familiar consequences.  Indeed, nations cannot be trusted to treat their neighbors with respect when they treat their own citizens with such contempt.  Regional peace without domestic peace is ephemeral at best.  In the words of famed dissident Vaclav Havel, "Without free, self-respecting, and autonomous citizens there can be no free and independent nations. Without internal peace, that is, peace among citizens and between the citizens and the state, there can be no guarantee of external peace."  The Middle East is no exception to this sound principle.
 
In 2006, Assad said "Worry does not mean fear, but readiness for confrontation."  Assad may or may not be ready for confrontation, but he is worried.  From the assassination of his top military aid to prison riots in Sidnaya that reportedly killed dozens, Syria is beset with internal strife.  The recent crackdown on dissidents is yet another sign of Syrian insecurity.
 
Syria remains draconian in its repression of dissent and wholehearted in its commitment to authoritarianism. The regime seeks engagement and respect from the West, but economic aid and political rapprochement must be linked to an improvement in human rights.  Just as the Jackson-Vanik amendment applied critical pressure to the decrepit Soviet state, so too must we mobilize today against the repressive Syrian regime.  Brave Middle Eastern dissidents are the free world's greatest ally.  Standing shoulder to shoulder with these champions of liberty is both a moral and security imperative and one that should be taken seriously by the new US president elect.
 
 
Nir Boms is the Vice President of the Centre for Middle East Freedom.  David Keyes is the Coordinator for Democracy Programs under Natan Sharansky at the Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies.
 
 

Kwakkelende economie Iran in aanloop presidentsverkiezingen

 
In Iran begint de verkiezingsstrijd voor volgend jaar langzaam op gang te komen. Zoals ook elders zal de economische situatie het waarschijnlijk belangrijkste thema zijn.
De scherpe inleiding hieronder is van Ami Isseroff.
 
____________
 
 
 
Iran's Mullahs face a dilemma.  The rule of Ahmadinejad is becoming unpopular. There is no real democracy in Iran as the Supreme Council has the final say in all things.  It is easy enough to invalidate all the reformist candidates as "un-Islamic" as they did in the past.
But if they do so they may face a popular uprising. Making women wear the Hijab or hanging a few homosexuals or Bahai is one thing, and to stage Holocaust denial conferences is good clean fun. It is OK --  as long as you are not a woman or a Bahai or a Jew of course..  But making people poorer will not be tolerated. Everyone wants A-bombs and missiles in Iran, needed to kill the Jews and the Americans, but nobody wants to pay for them. Make no mistake. The "reformist" Mullahs like Rafsanjani have the same agenda as the other brand. The nuclear development program began or continued in secret under the reformist regime and it will continue if Ahmadinejad is ousted. But Iran will put some window dressing on its society and its foreign policy. There will be less talk of wiping out Zionism and more talk about the plight of the poor Palestinians. Missile tests will not get so much publicity, and perhaps all the programs will slow down a bit.
 
An alternative is to close the straits of Hormuz and drive the price of oil back up again, or to get Sy Hersh and others to produce more canards about Israel or the US attacking Iran.
 
(A.I.)
 
 
 
Reuters - 05 December, 2008

Iran's main reformist party accused President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday of squandering windfall oil earnings and driving up inflation, part of its campaign to oust the leader at an election next year.

Most Iranians complain about high inflation, at over 29 percent, and rising unemployment. Analysts say the economy will be the main focus of the June 2009 election when Ahmadinejad is expected to run for another four-year term.

The Islamic Iran Participation Front said the government had not saved enough when oil prices were high to maintain spending now the price has dropped to below $ 50 a barrel. Prices hit $ 150 in July.

"His main campaign slogan was to share oil wealth fairly ... But instead, his economic policies have caused major problems for Iranians, particularly for lower-income people," Mohsen Mirdamadi, the party's secretary-general, told about 400 people at an annual party meeting.

Critics, both reformists and conservatives, including some who backed Ahmadinejad's first presidential bid, say the leader's high spending is to blame for surging inflation that stood at about 11 percent when he took office in 2005.

"Since the (1979 Islamic) revolution, Iran's total oil income has been $ 700 billion. Over 36 percent of it was earned during the tenure of office by Ahmadinejad," Mirdamadi said. "But inflation and unemployment rates are the highest now."

Mirdamadi said substantial political reform was needed.

"Reforms are the only solution to the economic crisis," Mirdamadi told the audience, which included reformist former president, Mohammad Khatami.

Khatami has yet to announce whether he wants to relaunch his reform plans by competing in the election. But his allies say he will announce his candidacy in the coming weeks.

Analysts say securing victory in the presidential vote will also depend on gaining support of Iran's clerical establishment.

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's top authority, has supported Ahmadinejad, and his comments may sway millions of revolutionary loyalists. Ahmadinejad is also popular in small towns and rural areas where he frequently doles out cash.

"Ahmadinejad's economic and foreign policies have failed. But he still can win if the leader supports his candidacy," said an analyst at the meeting, who asked not to be named.

Khatami fell out of favour with many Iranians for failing to take a firmer stand against Islamic hardliners during eight years in government. But allies say he could win another vote.

"Wherever people see a leading reformist, they complain about Ahmadinejad's policies. They want Khatami as their president again," Mirdamadi said.

"Winning the election is the first step. Iran's next president should compensate for the losses under Ahmadinejad."
 
 

EU ministers van BuZa beslissen tot nauwere samenwerking met Israel

 
Goed nieuws, na het bericht dat het Europese Parlement vorige week een beslissing tot versterkte samenwerking met Israel had opgeschort vanwege onvrede over de blokkade van Gaza en het gebrek aan voortgang in het vredesproces.
 
RP
------------

Last update - 04:41 09/12/2008

EU votes to upgrade Israel relations despite Arab lobbying
By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1044840.html
 
 
The European Union's 27 foreign ministers unanimously approved upgrading relations with Israel on Monday, despite vigorous efforts by the Palestinian Authority and Egypt to thwart the move.

The first expression of this decision will be a first-of-its-kind meeting between Israel's prime minister and all the leaders of the EU member states in Brussels this April.

Separately, the ministers decided to shelve a proposed action plan for the peace process in 2009, in response to Israeli pressure.
Throughout some 18 months of talks on the upgraded relationship, Egypt, the PA and other Arab countries lobbied against it. At the least, the Arabs argued, the upgrade should be conditioned on an Israeli settlement freeze.

Last month, PA Prime Minister Salam Fayyad personally raised the issue with several European foreign ministers, and as a result, at least five countries - including Britain, Belgium, Ireland, Cyprus and Malta - said they would not sign the upgrade agreement unless it were linked to progress in Israeli-Palestinian final-status negotiations. That threatened to derail the entire agreement.

Last week, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni traveled to Brussels to do her own lobbying with the EU foreign ministers, first and foremost Bernard Kouchner of France, which currently holds the EU's rotating presidency. At one point, she asked everyone else in the room to leave so that she could speak with Kouchner privately. During that conversation, the two agreed that there would be no linkage, but the EU would issue a separate statement stressing the need to continue the final-status talks.

The two also agreed that the EU would not officially adopt the action plan for the peace process, which France had formulated, but would instead leave it as a mere proposal. The plan, first reported in Haaretz last week, stated that the EU would, inter alia, press Israel to reopen Orient House, the PA's former headquarters in East Jerusalem.

As a result of the upgrade in relations, Israel's foreign minister will start meeting three times a year with all 27 EU foreign ministers. Other ministers will meet once a year with their European counterparts. Israel and the EU will also conduct a strategic dialogue on issues such as the peace process, the Iranian threat, counterterrorism and organized crime. In addition, the EU pledged to help Israel integrate into UN agencies and to include Israeli experts in EU peacekeeping forces.

Vierde schip Free Gaza Movement bereikt Gazastrook ongehinderd

 
Er is dus geen blokkade: Israel laat sommige schepen wel door en andere niet, afhankelijk van het risico dat er terroristen of wapens aan boord zijn. Een schip dat vanuit Cyprus, een bevriend land, vetrekt met aan boord westerse sympathisanten van de Palestijnen, is wat anders dan een boot uit een Arabische staat of zelfs Arabieren uit Israel.

RP
-------

Fourth blockade-defying ship reaches Gaza
Date: 09 / 12 / 2008  Time:  16:25
www. maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=33836

 
Bethlehem/Gaza - Ma'an - International and Palestinian human rights advocates sailed to the Gaza Strip in defiance of an Israeli naval blockade on Tuesday in the fourth such voyage since August.

The ship named "Dignity" carried one ton of medical supplies and high-protein baby formula, in addition to a delegation of 11 international academics, human rights workers and journalists, the Free Gaza movement said.

Among them are two Jewish academics from the London School of Economics and a British surgeon planning to volunteer in Gaza.

The Dignity left Cyprus on Monday night. Palestinian officials and ordinary people assembled on the Gaza shore to welcome the vessel.

Israel blocked three similar attempts to sail to Gaza in the last eight days, including aid shipments sent by Qatar and Libya, and a delegation of Palestinian lawmakers from Israel.

According to Caoimhe Butterly, a Free Gaza coordinator who spoke to Ma'an, the shop faced no interference or radio contact from the Israeli navy. But the ship's own radar showed naval vessels passing within a few miles of the vessel, she noted.

Asked why the Free Gaza ship was allowed through while others were blocked, Butterly said it was a sign that Israel "does not see this project as a threat."

Butterly added that the group is now planning to "up the ante" by bringing larger amounts of aid and greater numbers of human rights workers to observe the effects of the Israeli blockade.

"The problems in Gaza will not be solved with symbolic amounts of aid, but with concrete politically direct action to break the siege," she said.

Just 11 people were onboard Tuesday's ship as the group brought more aid than previous ships and is planning to leave Gaza transporting Palestinian students who have been denied the right to attend universities abroad.

The two academics on board were sent by the British Committee for the Universities of Palestine (BRICUP) to highlight the impact of the blockade on the education sector.

"Higher education opportunities are extremely limited in Gaza. Many vital disciplines, including speech therapy, dentistry and physical therapy are not taught in Gaza, and there is no opportunity for doctoral study either in Gaza or in the West Bank. Study abroad is the only alternative for Palestinian students, yet this alternative is being denied them by the Israeli authorities," BRICUP said in a statement.

dinsdag 9 december 2008

Tsjechische EU voorzitter wil banden met Israel versterken

 
Misschien kan hij dan ook een krachtig geluid laten horen wat betreft de Durban follow-up conferentie in april, die weer op een anti-Israel haatfestijn dreigt uit te lopen. De concept teksten voor de algemene verklaring, waarin Israel onder andere een racistische apartheidsstaat wordt genoemd en van genocide wordt beschuldigd, dienen grondig gewijzigd te worden, wil de EU legitimiteit aan deze conferentie verlenen.
 
RP
-----------

The Jerusalem Post
Dec 8, 2008 12:10 | Updated Dec 8, 2008 12:59
 
EU presidency to boost ties with Israel
By AP
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1228728104516&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


The Czech government says it wants to boost the European Union's ties with Israel once it assumes the bloc's presidency in January.

Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg says Prague will ask the EU's 27 countries to agree to stepping up ties with Israel.

The Palestinians oppose any EU effort to widen relations with Israel in political, economic, scientific, security, health and other spheres. They say Israel should do more to ease the humanitarian crisis in their areas.

Schwarzenberg says increasing relations were "not only in the interest of Israel but also very much in the interest of the Palestinian people."

The Czechs hold the EU presidency in the first half of 2009.

Afschrikking Israel tegenover Hamas verzwakt


Een van de redenen dat Israels afschrikking niet sterker is, is het feit dat het leger gebonden is aan het internationale recht, terwijl Hamas dat niet is en daar ook nauwelijks op wordt aangesproken. Een andere reden is dat Hamas steeds meer internationale sympathie geniet en zij de blokkade van Gaza handig in haar voordeel weet te gebruiken. Al die groeperingen en politici die de blokkade als onmenselijk veroordelen en eisen dat Israel met Hamas praat en zich toegeeflijker opstelt spelen Hamas direct in de kaart. Ook de recente opschorting van een nauwere samenwerking tussen Israel en de EU vanwege deze blokkade, versterkt Hamas.

RP
---------


ANALYSIS / Israeli deterrence against Hamas is weakening
 
By Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff - Haaretz
Last update - 02:19 08/12/2008
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1044413.html

 
Three numbers are at the heart of Israel's decision-making process over the Gaza Strip: 20, 40 and 70. Twenty-plus kilometers is the maximum range of Hamas' rockets in the Strip (which can hit Sderot, Ashkelon, Netivot and Kiryat Gat); 40 kilometers is the range they will be able to reach in the coming months, if missile production is not halted (Ofakim, Kiryat Malachi, Ashdod, Be'er Sheva and Yavneh will be at risk of attack); 70 kilometers is the range the Palestinians are striving to reach. At that point, Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and the Dan Region would be within range of Palestinian rockets.

Most Israeli decision makers assume the Gaza Strip will erupt sooner or later. The debate concerns whether the dozens of rockets that have been fired at the Negev in the last few weeks justifies immediate offensive action by the Israel Defense Forces. Those in favor are calling for a preemptive strike against Hamas.

Not surprisingly, the idea of renewed escalation has been raised in the election campaigns. Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni has called for an end to restraint; Vice Premier Haim Ramon contends that the Hamas government in Gaza must be brought down, and that this can happen even without a major military operation. Defense Minister Ehud Barak preaches "good judgment and responsibility."

As for Ramon's apparent hint at the possibility of assassinating Hamas leaders, the question is who will take over? Wouldn't anarchy result, making a difficult target for Israeli strikes?

Hamas seems to be changing its policies. Hamas claims (and Israel denies) that the cease-fire agreement, which will end on December 19, must either expand to the West Bank or be be cancelled. Hamas knows that the chances this demand will be met are nil. However, by allowing the smaller factions to fire rockets, it seeks to attain an extension on the cease-fire from a position of strength. For example, to significantly reduce the economic siege on the Gaza Strip.

Hamas therefore is considering ratcheting up hostilities ahead of December 19, possibly including massive rocket fire, and even an attempted "strategic" terror attack like the abduction of a soldier. Hamas has chosen controlled escalation to counter criticism by groups like Islamic Jihad and local Al-Qaida affiliates. But the siege has taken its toll. Two-thirds of the population live on international food aid.

The Id al-Adha holiday, which begins today, will not be particularly festive in Gaza. When comparing the situation in the West Bank to that in Gaza, Hamas does not come out looking favorable. Israel's permission for Israeli Arabs to visit the West Bank for the holiday will be good for businesses, and 230 prisoners are slated to be released from Israeli jails. Hamas needs an achievement to counter Fatah, like a cease-fire on favorable terms.

Some of the IDF brass disagree with Barak's stance that there are two possibilities - complete quiet or all-out war. Some want more freedom to take offensive action. Even those who object, as we do, to major action must concede that Israeli deterrence against Hamas is weakening.

Beperkingen voor IDF in terugschieten op Qassam raketten uit Gazastrook

 
Tegengesteld aan wat veel critici van Israel ons voorhouden, spelen ethische overwegingen en het internationale recht een grote rol bij de acties van het Israelische leger, en beperken het in haar optreden.
 
RP
-----------

Defense Ministry's Legal Adviser Ahaz Ben-Ari limits IDF response to Gaza rocket fire
 
Dr. Aaron Lerner
Date: 8 December 2008

 
Yediot Achronot correspondents Yossi Yehoshua, Tzvi Singer and Matan Tzuri report in today's edition that the Defense Ministry's Legal Adviser Ahaz Ben-Ari has issued a legal opinion according to which artillery fire towards open areas in response to Gaza rocket attackers is permitted but not built up areas.

"International law does not give a blanket restriction against artillery fire towards military targets in the Gaza Strip,," Ben-Ari wrote, "however in light of the fact that the degree of accuracy of artillery fire is very low, and the level of damage is relatively great, artillery fire can only be carried out towards relatively open areas, if the assessment  is that as a result the launchers will be damaged and the launches from those areas will be stopped or reduced, and this without an exaggerated amount of damage to civilians who might be in the area."

If there are repeated launches from a built up area, "it is possible to increase the response such that the residents of that same area are given a warning of the intention to respond to fire with the recommendation that they leave the area within a reasonable period of time...In any event, carpet bombing is prohibited even if the population evacuates the area and this in order to prevent the certain destruction of the property of civilians."

 
Dr. Aaron Lerner, Director IMRA (Independent Media Review & Analysis)
(Mail POB 982 Kfar Sava)
Website:
http://www.imra.org.il
 

maandag 8 december 2008

Egyptische sjeik moet aftreden na handen schudden met Shimon Peres

 
In Egypte, waar Israel in 1979 vrede mee sloot, wordt Israel niet veel anders bekeken dan in Arabische staten die offici? nog met Israel in oorlog zijn. Het teruggeven van land is dus geen afdoende voorwaarde voor vrede en broederlijke relaties. Desondanks wordt de vrede met Egypte als een succes beschouwd en bovendien in het belang van beide landen. En dat is precies de crux: zolang vrede met Israel als in Egyptes belang wordt beschouwd, zal Egypte het vredesverdrag niet opzeggen, maar wat als Mubarak sterft? Het Egyptische volk lijkt Israel nog steeds als vijand te zien, en de media werken daar hard aan mee.
 
RP
----------

Egyptian Media, Politicians, Call on Sheikh Tantawi to Resign after he Shook Hands with Shimon Peres

 
 
Several Egyptian newspapers and lawmakers in Egypt have called on the country's foremost Islamic cleric, Sheik Muhammad Seyed Tantawi to resign Saturday for shaking the Israeli president's hand at a conference. Tantawi is the Imam of Al Azhar university, Sunni Islam's most prestigious and authoritative seat of learning.  Tantawi met Israeli President Shimon Peres at an interfaith meeting and shook his hands.  Egyptian media have since been running a photo of Grand Sheik Tantawi shaking hands with Shimon Peres almost daily since the two met at a U.N.-sponsored interfaith dialogue in New York last month. The photo is accompanied by critical editorials and comments by lawmakers. The U.N.-sponsored interfaith conference held in New York in mid-November attracted 80 countries and 14 world leaders, including Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah. Supposedly, the conference was meant to highlight moderate aspects of Islam and evidently to help advance the Saudi peace initiative.

An Al-Ousboua  editorial published on Saturday stated that Peres' hands were tainted with the blood of thousands of Palestinians who have lost their homes in Israel. 
The paper called on Tantawi to "ritually purify his hands" after the shake.

Egypt has a government controlled press. Nothing is printed in the Egyptian press without the approval of government censors, and therefore the attacks can be viewed as having official sanction, it not approval. Tantawi, who was appointed by the Egyptian government, was quoted in Al-Masry Al-Youm newspaper and several others as saying he shook the Israeli president's hand without recognizing him.

A spokesman for al-Azhar was quoted in the paper as blaming Tantawi's handlers for not paying attention and misdirecting the cleric toward Peres.

Hisham Kassem, an Egyptian activist and publisher, expressed doubt about Tantawi's version of the story, saying "how can you go to an interfaith meeting and not know who Peres is?"
 
Peres' office declined comment on "Egypt's internal matters."

But at the time of the meeting, his office said the encounter was pleasant, and Tantawi and Peres sat next to each during a dinner and had a "very serious conversation."

Many Egyptian opposition lawmakers have called for the cleric to step down over the handshake.

"I feel shame because the person who did this is the head of one of Islam's greatest institutions," lawmaker Hamdein Sabaheen was quoted as saying Saturday in Al-Dustour newspaper.

Egypt supposedly has a peace treaty with Israel, but it is fairly meaningless in terms of public opinion and internal government policy. Egypt is a US client state, receiving over $2 billion in aid each year, most of which are spent on armaments. The Egyptian media are not allowed to be overly critical of the government, but are free to be rabidly critical of the United States and Israel, and to publish anti-Semitic materials. These have included articles praising Hitler and a TV series that insisted that the forged  
Protocols of the Elders of Zion, an anti-Semitic document, were in fact true. 
 
Egypt's aged president Mubarak will probably be succeeded by his son Gamal. However, it is not unlikely that Mubarak's death would destabilize Egypt. The largest opposition faction, and the only one that is permitted to function effectively, is the extremist Muslim Brotherhood. The brotherhood has renounced violence as a means of taking power in Egypt, but still adheres to the program of worldwide Jihad and enmity to Israel. Opposition figures in Egypt have called for scrapping the peace treaty with Israel.
 
 

Volgens PLO ambassadeur in Libanon is VS een vijandelijke staat

 
Het officiële PLO standpunt dat men een tweestatenoplossing nastreeft en Israel als onderhandelingspartner tegenmoet treedt, is nog niet bij iedere PLO vertegenwoordiger doorgedrongen.....
 
-------------
 

MEMRI TV. No. 1933| December 5, 2008
PLO Ambassador to Lebanon Abbas Zaki: We Consider the U.S An Enemy Country
 
Following are excerpts from an interview with PLO Ambassador to Lebanon Abbas Zaki, which aired on OTV on November 7, 2008.

To view this clip, visit
www.memritv.org/clip/en/1933.htm

 
Abbas Zaki: We consider the U.S. to be an enemy because its only strategic alliance is with Israel.

Interviewer: How could you possibly accept your enemy in your land?

Abbas Zaki: What do you mean? We meet even with Israel.

Interviewer: How can you consider Israel to be your enemy, if you signed a peace treaty with it?

Abbas Zaki: Allow me... This enemy... If I had the capabilities of the U.S. - would I be fighting it or negotiating with it?

Interviewer: Israel ceased being an enemy once you signed a peace treaty with it. I don't know how it could be your enemy. Do you talk to the Israelis as if they were your enemies? Do you talk to Israel as a friendly or enemy country?

Abbas Zaki: An enemy country, which owes us certain things. The heroic Vietnamese used to negotiate with the French, while they were slaughtering them.

Interviewer: I can assure you that in his speeches, Abu Mazen says the U.S. is a friendly country.

Abbas Zaki: Well, this isn't true. Perhaps Abu Mazen, in his position, needs to use diplomatic language, but he is the greatest critic of the U.S.

_________________
 
For assistance, please contact MEMRI TV Project at memritv@memri.org.
 
The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request.

MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution.

MEMRI TV Project
P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837
Phone: (202) 955-9070
Fax: (202) 955-9077
www.memritv.org

Serie maatregelen in regio Nabloes voor vrijer verkeer Palestijnen

 
Het zijn kleine stapjes, maar Israel heeft sinds Annapolis een heel aantal van deze maatregelen genomen, en in totaal zijn meer dan 100 checkpoints en wegversperringen verwijderd.
 
RP
---------

IDF Spokesperson's Office December 7th, 2008
Series of Goodwill Measures taken in Nablus Area

 
A number of goodwill measures intended to improve Palestinian daily life in Nablus will be taken tomorrow, due to a recent decrease in terror activities originating from the city and as part of the Relief plan authorized by the Minister of Defense, Mr. Ehud Barak and the IDF Chief of the General Staff, Lt.-Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi.

As a part of these measures, a new pedestrian passageway will be opened tomorrow (Monday) at the Huwwara crossing. This passageway includes two pedestrian security check lanes and a humanitarian lane to be used by children, women, men aged over 45, doctors, teachers and human rights activists.

Five million Israeli Shekels were devoted to the upgrading of the Huwwara crossing for the convenience of the Palestinian residents of Nablus and the surrounding area, and in order to ensure the safety of the IDF soldiers manning the crossing.

Additionally, the Beit Furik and Awarta checkpoints (which was recently relocated to the junction leading to the Awarta village), located south of Nablus, will be opened tomorrow (Monday) to the free passage of Palestinian vehicles into Nablus, allowing Palestinians to pass through without undergoing a security check. Palestinian civilians will be able to leave the city with the presentation of the appropriate authorizations. Security checks will only be undertaken when required due to specific intelligence or operational needs.

Passage through the Beit Furik checkpoint will be permitted for vehicles only, and the pedestrian route will be closed. The opening of the checkpoint will enable the easy flow of traffic for Palestinian civilians from Nablus to the Palestinian villages southeast of the city.

The platform at the Awarta crossing, used for the checking of goods in the checkpoint, has been removed, and trucks transferring goods will only be required to go through a basic security check.

The opening of the Awarta crossing will allow a quick, convenient and free passage without the need to present authorization. This will enable increased trade, lower transportation costs and create an overall improvement to the financial situation in the area.

In addition, the Ganot crossing that has been open for the past months until 18:00 every day will remain open 24 hours a day.

The opening of the crossings was made possible following regional security assessments and is a part of a series of goodwill measures taken to improve the financial situation of the Palestinian residents of Nablus. Nevertheless, it must be emphasized that in the event that the terror organizations make cynical use of the crossings, appropriate steps will be taken.

These steps are a part of recent actions taken throughout Judea and Samaria in order to improve Palestinian daily life. The Al-Badhan crossing, connecting Nablus and the northern Jordan valley, was opened for the free passage of Palestinian vehicles on November 7th, 2006. The Asira Ash-Shamaliya crossing, in the northern part of Nablus, was opened on April 28th and the Ganot crossing, connecting Nablus and the villages to its north, was opened on August 9th, 2008, connecting the city to villages such as Sabastiya, Deir Sharaf, Burqa and others.


--------------------------------------------
 
Israel eases travel restrictions at key West Bank checkpoint
By The Associated Press
Last update - 14:55 06/12/2008
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1044043.html

 
Palestinians packed into cars to leave the West Bank city of Nablus on Saturday after Israel eased restrictions on residents leaving the town in vehicles for the first time in six years.

Luay Saadi, head of Palestinian-Israeli security coordination in Nablus, said Saturday that he was told by his Israeli counterparts that Palestinian men and women over age 50 can now leave the town in their cars, without prior permission from Israel's army.

An Israel Defense Forces spokeswoman could not confirm the new policy.

Most Nablus residents cross an Israeli checkpoint on foot to leave town or obtain a permit from Israel's military to exit in a vehicle.

But in an unusual turn of events on Saturday, IDF soldiers allowed all Palestinians in vehicles - not just those driven by people over 50 - to leave the city, prompting a rush of residents to enjoy the sudden easing up of restrictions.

Palestinian taxi drivers working around the large Israeli checkpoint of Hawara on Nablus' southern outskirts said they were told by IDF soldiers that the measure was a goodwill gesture for an upcoming Muslim holiday, meant to begin on Monday.

"Today I'm going in and out without a permit," said taxi driver Khaled al-Nadi.

Since 2002, Nablus residents have required a permit from Israel's army to leave their town in a vehicle. This is the first time those restrictions have been eased.

Checkpoints are one of the main grievances Palestinians cite of Israel's occupation of the West Bank. They hinder movement and have choked off trade.

Israel maintains a system of roadblocks throughout the West Bank to prevent Palestinian militants from carrying out attacks. Scores of suicide bombers and gunmen were dispatched from Nablus to attack Israelis at the height of fighting between Palestinians and Israel.

The town of 170,000 is ringed by eight checkpoints and road barriers to control movement.

An IDF spokeswoman said she was not aware of the new policy but said they were building extra lanes at the large Hawara checkpoint outside of Nablus to speed up movement.

In the Gaza Strip on Saturday, Palestinian official Amjad Shawa said an expected boat carrying a Qatari delegation was delayed for technical reasons. Shawa did not specify those reasons.

The boat was to be manned by pro-Palestinian activists. It was to ship the Qataris to Gaza on Sunday to defy Israel and Egypt's blockade of the coastal territory. The blockade was imposed after the militant group Hamas seized power of Gaza in July last year.

Activists have made three blockade-busting boat rides to Gaza, but this would have been the first carrying an Arab delegation.

230 Palestijnen vrij als gebaar van goede wil

 
IJzervreter Aaron Lerner is tegen iedere concessie die Israel doet aan de Palestijnen, maar in dit geval heeft hij een punt: hoe groot is het verschil tussen de poging iemand te vermoorden en de moord zelf? De relevante vraag hier is vooral hoe groot de kans is dat deze mensen opnieuw aanslagen gaan plegen, tegenover het positieve effect dat uitgaat van een dergelijke 'goodwill gesture'. Als je bedenkt hoeveel daadwerkelijke moordenaars Israel bereid is vrij te laten voor Shalit (men heeft zich bij het merendeel van de namen op de lijst die Hamas heeft overhandigd neergelegd), is dit peanuts en dus enerzijds niks om je druk om te maken en anderzijds zal het ook Abbas niet echt helpen omdat deze vrijlating in het niet valt bij wat Hamas straks voor Shalit krijgt.
 
RP
----------
 
List of 230 Palestinians set for release includes 81 murderers
Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA
7 December 2008

A review of the list of 230 Palestinian prisoners set for release that appear on the website of the Israel Prison Authority finds that 81 are serving time for attempting to murder. See www.ips.gov.il/NR/rdonlyres/E4155671-D884-4A9F-9E67-AB868A6F6694/0/prisoners_list_Dec_2008.pdf for the list in Hebrew

While the announcement (see below) notes that none of them have "blood on their hands" it is not due to a lack of effort on their part.  Most of the remaining prisoners on the list were sentenced for shooting at people, placing bombs, and other violent activity - but for some reason the charges did not include the intention to kill.

======

Notification-Release of Palestinian Prisoners 07.12.08
www.ips.gov.il/Shabas/KATAVOT_OLD/YEAR_2008/December+2008/Notification+In+Respect+To+The+of+Release+of+Palestinian++Prisoners+07.12.08.htm

On the occasion of the festival Eid al-Adha (Festival of Sacrifice ) and  as a gesture of goodwill to the Head of the Palestinian Authority, the Government of Israel decided on December 7 2008,  to release 230 Palestinian prisoners in accordance to the criteria set by previous  government decisions, that is to say no release of those prisoners with "blood on their hands " belonging to Hamas or Palestinian Jihad.

The government appointed a Ministerial Committee which approved the list of prisoners presented to it who were found suitable to the criteria fixed by a Coordinating Committee headed by the Director-General of the Ministry of Justice including representatives of all the relevant authorities connected with the matter (General Security Service, Israel Prison Service, Israel Defence Force and Ministry of Justice ).

It should be noted that the decision in respect to the prisoners release is conditional to the agreement of the relevant authorities and after considering any objections that were raised.

For  inquiries or further information , please contact the Department 0f Pardons at the Ministry of Justice : 02-6466801/2/3/4/ between 08:30-16:00


--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

Olmert veroordeelt 'pogrom' door kolonisten in Hebron

 
Olmert neemt deze woorden niet zomaar in de mond, maar wat ik niet helemaal begrijp is waarom men geen betere voorzorgsmaatregelen nam om dergelijke excessen te voorkomen? Men weet inmiddels dat er een kleine groep extremisten onder de kolonisten is, die nergens voor terug lijken te schrikken.
 
RP
----------
 
Last update - 21:00 07/12/2008
Olmert: I am shamed by Hebron settlers' pogrom
 
By Haaretz Service and The Associated Press
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1044331.html
 
 
Outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Sunday lashed out at settlers in Hebron who attacked Palestinians and their property in recent days, joining other Israeli figures in branding the attacks a "progrom."
 
Settlers in the West Bank city went on a rampage after Israel Defense Forces evicted dozens of them from a building whose ownership is disputed. The move came after Israel's High Court ordered that the settlers leave the building, dubbed the "House of Contention."
 
"We are the children of a people whose historic ethos is built on the memory of pogroms," Olmert said during the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem. "The sight of Jews firing at innocent Palestinians has no other name than pogrom."
 
"I am ashamed that Jews could do such a thing," Olmert went on. "I have asked the defense minister and other relevant elements to do all it takes, with all the strength needed and in any place controlled by the State of Israel, in order to stop this phenomenon."
 
Video footage supplied by the Israeli human rights group B'Tselem shows a settler firing shots at Palestinian rock-throwers from close range, hitting two of them. A second settler is also seen opening fire.
 
"I have turned to the appropriate elements in order to assure that law enforcement authorities will take aggressive and sharp action to bring those responsible to justice," Olmert said Sunday.
 
Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann also slammed the attacks as a pogrom, in a television interview over the weekend.
 
Palestinians said that 17 Palestinians were wounded in the clashes, five of them by gunfire. The two settlers caught on film have turned themselves in to police.

zondag 7 december 2008

Al-Jazeera journalisten door PA geweerd uit Mukata

 
The PA has, over the past few years, become less tolerant toward "unfriendly" journalists, especially Palestinian newsmen who report about financial corruption and abuse of human rights in PA-controlled areas.

Seven Palestinian reporters have been arrested by Abbas's security forces in the past few months for allegedly expressing sympathy with Hamas. Most were released after being warned against publishing material that reflects negatively on Abbas and the PA leadership.

 
Vreemdgenoeg lezen we dit niet in Nederlandse kranten. Wanneer journalisten vanwege de extreem onfaire berichtgeving een paar weken lang Gaza niet in mogen is dat uiteraard wel voorpagina nieuws. Journalisten dienen ten allen tijde toegang te hebben tot gebieden, behalve wanneer dat om veiligheidsredenen niet mogelijk is. Anderzijds mag van journalisten hoor- en wederhoor worden verwacht, en ook de intentie om de zaken goed weer te geven. Sommige journalisten lijken er slechts op uit te zijn om Israel zwart te maken en zijn eigenlijk meer activisten voor de Palestijnen, die Israel uiteraard niet overal hoeft toe te laten.
 
De berichtgeving van Al Jazeera wat betreft Hamas en de Palestijnse Autoriteit kan ik niet beoordelen, maar over het algemeen valt me op hoe mild er over Hamas wordt geschreven.
 
RP
---------
 
The Jerusalem Post
Dec 7, 2008 1:15 | Updated Dec 7, 2008 12:39
 
 
The Palestinian Authority has decided to ban a number of journalists from entering the presidential Mukata compound in Ramallah.

The decision is aimed at punishing the journalists because of their criticism of the PA leadership or for reporting about the activities of Hamas leaders.

Al-Jazeera reporters and TV crews are among those who now appear on the PA's blacklist. They have been denied access to the Mukata for the past two weeks.

Other journalists working for Arab and Western media outlets have also been told that they are no longer welcome to visit the compound.

The Foreign Press Association protested "in the strongest possible terms" the ban on Al-Jazeera journalists and urged the authorities in Ramallah to immediately end this restriction.

"There can be no legitimate excuse for this unacceptable curtailment of press access to the office and activities of the [PA] president," the association said in a statement.

The decision to ban Al-Jazeera came after the popular TV station failed to carry a live broadcast of a speech given by PA President Mahmoud Abbas in front of the PLO Central Council in Ramallah.

Instead, the station broadcast live from Damascus, where Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal was addressing a conference of radical groups.

Al-Jazeera was banned from covering the recent meeting between Abbas and the visiting Italian president in line with the new sanction.

Al-Jazeera has thus far refrained from reporting about the PA's decision to boycott the station. A source in the station said that the decision not to report about the ban was taken after the PA warned Al-Jazeera that publicizing the issue would only cause more damage to its reporters.

PA officials accused Al-Jazeera of being biased in favor of Hamas, noting that this was not the first time that the station had served as a platform for Hamas and other radical Islamic groups.

Some PA officials even went as far as demanding the closure of the Al-Jazeera offices in the West Bank. The homes and vehicles of some Al-Jazeera reporters have been either torched or stoned by Fatah activists in the West Bank in the past two years.

A senior PA official told The Jerusalem Post that Al-Jazeera was not only providing a free and open platform for Hamas, but was also inciting the Palestinians against the leadership of Mahmoud Abbas.

The official claimed that Al-Jazeera had openly sided with Hamas when the movement took full control over the Gaza Strip in June 2007.

Earlier this week, the largest Palestinian news agency, Ramattan, decided to suspend its work in the West Bank after the PA leadership also banned its reporters from entering the Mukata.

The agency also accused the PA security forces of raiding its Ramallah offices, arresting its workers and confiscating a mobile broadcast truck.

Another journalist who has been denied access to the Mukata is Nael Nakhleh, a resident of Al-Bireh who writes from newspapers in the Gulf. Nakhleh was arrested by the PA's General Intelligence for allegedly publishing reports that reflect negatively on the PA leaders.

The PA has, over the past few years, become less tolerant toward "unfriendly" journalists, especially Palestinian newsmen who report about financial corruption and abuse of human rights in PA-controlled areas.

Seven Palestinian reporters have been arrested by Abbas's security forces in the past few months for allegedly expressing sympathy with Hamas. Most were released after being warned against publishing material that reflects negatively on Abbas and the PA leadership.

Hebron: hoe het geweld van extremistische kolonisten in te dammen?

 
Er is al eerder gevreesd voor - en gedreigd met - een burgeroorlog, onder meer bij de evacuatie van de Joodse nederzettingen in de Gazastrook. Tot nu toe is die vrees ongegrond gebleven; laten we hopen dat dat zo blijft. De kolonistenbeweging lijkt haar steun binnen Israël systematisch te overschatten, evenals haar steun van God (tenminste op het praktische vlak). De kans dat ze gewapenderhand het IDF te lijf zullen gaan lijkt klein, maar zorgwekkender is dat ze zich (nog meer) op de Palestijnen gaan afreageren.
 
Wouter
__________


Is worst yet to come?
Evacuating Hebron house was easy; containing violence of Jewish radicals a tougher task
 
Ron Ben-Yishai
Published: 12.05.08, 13:11 / Israel Opinion
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3633938,00.html
 

It is not over yet. The disputed house in Hebron was indeed evacuated, yet the struggle is far from being over. The dangerous and volatile part is still ahead of us. Hundreds of members of the radical settler camp have spread around the hills in Judea and Samaria and from there they are infiltrating Palestinian communities and roads in order to exact what they euphemistically refer to as a "price tag." The meaning of this term in less euphemistic terms is pogroms against the Palestinians, and possibly harassment of Israeli security forces, at as many sites as possible, with the declared aim of creating major conflagration in Judea and Samaria.

This mayhem is meant to create the kind of trauma in Israeli public opinion that would prevent further evacuations in the future. Security forces are tasked with a complex mission in the coming hours and days: Curbing the "Jewish Intifada" at its outset, before the Palestinians respond, before blood is spilled, before we see casualties on both sides, and before Israel is isolated in international public opinion because of the helplessness it displays in handling the rioters. This mission is much more complicated than the evacuation of the house in Hebron.

The relatively smooth evacuation of the house can be credited to the fact that the IDF and police learned and applied the lessons of previous evacuation operations. Therefore, they designated a huge number of forces for the mission, which created a situation whereby the law-breakers were facing an inferior position. The huge number of troops also prevented police officers and soldiers from finding themselves in distressful situations that could have prompted them to resort to unreasonable violence. Meanwhile, using special police forces and Border Guard troops while keeping the IDF away from the physical confrontation was also a wise move. And most importantly – the element of surprise.

The Yesha Council leadership and several politicians are accusing the defense minister of deceit that enabled him to embark on a surprise operation. They say that the dialogue Barak engaged in with them in the morning was only meant to lull them and the people barricaded in the Hebron house. The settlers claim that Barak, who appeared to be trying to buy some more time, in fact decided at that point already that the evacuation operation will start around noon.

However, this argument is baseless, because Barak said in advance that the proposals of settler leaders which he was aware of were unacceptable. Even those who are upset about the "deceit" must admit that the secrecy and element of surprise made the clashes between those barricaded in the house and security forces less violent than expected. We should also note that one of the reasons for the relatively low number of people barricaded in the house was the fact that the youngsters who arrived at the site recently and carried out "mini-pogroms" against the Palestinians in the days ahead of the evacuation caused disgust among the Yesha leadership, as well as among the silent majority of the settlers – and even among right-wing politicians. These people isolated themselves and even their supporters distanced themselves from them.

Averting civil war
However, all of the above does not guarantee that security forces will be successful later on as well. We should assume that the anger and frustration caused by the evacuation among the settlers, and particularly among radical rightists and the "hilltop youths," will prompt hundreds of them to get out there. Some of them already vowed to return to the building that was the focal point of the confrontation.

The IDF and police have indeed reinforced their presence across Judea and Samaria. They are also making sure to closely monitor, through intelligence means, developments in the area and have prepared reserve forces and even helicopters that would transport them quickly to friction points. However, the mountainous topographical conditions, as well as the wadis and orchards, enable small groups of rioters to secretly infiltrate Palestinian communities and carry out their intentions. Pursuing them would be a difficult and complex mission, and could prompt unplanned clashes with Palestinian gunmen who may take advantage of the opportunity. In addition, we should keep in mind that the forces designated for curbing Jewish rioters would not be available to carry out anti-terror operations against the Palestinians.

These are difficult days for the Israeli government, for security forces, and also for the established leaderships of the settlers in Judea and Samaria. If they are unable, through cooperation, to contain the riots and curb them, not only will Israeli democracy be undermined; the whole State of Israel could end up facing chaos and possibly, heaven forbid, a civil war.
 
 

Geschiedenis van de Joden in Irak

 
Vaak wordt een beeld gecreëerd als hadden de Joden het altijd goed in de Arabische landen, totdat de zionisten kwamen en de Palestijnen met geweld verdreven.
 
Hoewel de Joden het in de Arabische landen over het algemeen beter hadden dan in Europa, waren zij tweederangsburgers en werden zij in min of meerdere mate gediscrimineerd en soms ook vernederd en getreiterd.
 
In Irak won in de jaren dertig het nazisme aan invloed, en daarmee verslechterde de situatie van de Joden aanzienlijk.
 
RP
--------------

 

Two narratives have been generated about the life of Jews in Arab lands. One claims that life was wonderful, the other claims that life was terrible. Saul Silas Fathi's account of his early life in Baghdad, related in his book, Full Circle, seems to bear out both versions. In fact the same could be said of the life of Jews in many places in the Diaspora. It was very good until it was very bad. Saul's father was director of the Iraqi railway system. His family lived well, but by the 1930s, the storm was gathering. Below is Fathi's account of the prelude to the Farhud (Farhoud or Farhood), the 1941 Iraqi pogrom of of the Jews.

Click here to read more about Saul Fathi and Full Circle  

http://www.saulsilasfathi.com/

Farhood: Krystallnacht in Baghdad, June 1, 1941

Part I: Prelude

 

The treatment of Jews in Iraq during the early part of the twentieth century had been relatively positive. The British under the 1917 mandate saw the value of having Jews work with them and later with the newly formed monarchy. They realized that the Jews, who were already holding prominent positions in government and commerce, understood the Iraqi culture and knew both English and the local dialects.

In Iraq, Zionism, or the encouragement of Jewish identity and culture, was permitted from World War I to the early 1930s. However, with the rise of pro- German and pro-Nazi sympathizers in Iraq, restrictions began to be leveled on Jews. In 1933, the Iraqi government forbade the teaching of Hebrew and restricted its use to the Holy Scriptures and in prayers. Extra permits and licensing fees were levied on Jews; and sometimes an extra bribe had to be made in order for Jews to ship or receive goods, without their merchandise sitting in a customs dock indefinitely. Many Jews also were fired from their government jobs.

By the mid 1930s, Nazi-inspired policies became more widespread. Arab boys in Baghdad were often sent to Germany to attend Hitler Youth events. Public high schools stopped teaching French, the language of diplomacy, and began to teach German. Junior high school boys were encouraged to join the Futtuwa, paramilitary programs based on the Hitler Youth groups. Finally, in 1938, no Jews were permitted to attend the public high schools, nor were Jews permitted to leave the country. The Jewish community restricted its own movements to known safe places: work, school, and the marketplace. Though the Balfour Declaration after World War I favored British support for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, the British in Iraq could do nothing about the growing Arab support of Arab Palestinians and anti-Zionist hate. Nazi anti-Jewish propaganda found its way into Iraq and was actively distributed. German-backed anti-Jewish radio broadcasts filled the Iraqi airwaves, and short-wave radio receivers could pick up anti-Jewish broadcasts from Germany. Hajj Amin al Hussayni, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem (1920-1937) under the British mandate, had fled to Iraq after authorizing terrorist attacks on the British and the Jews in Palestine, and was welcomed by the Iraqi Prime Minister, Nuri Al Sa'id. In response, Hussayni and his old friend, Fawzi Kawakchi [Kaukji, Kawkji], spent a year agitating the Iraqi populace against the monarchy, the Regent Abd Al-Ilah, the British, and, of course, the Jews. They used Iraqi radio as their primary propaganda tool.

 

-->  Story continues here: Iraqi Jews before the Fall


The description of the pogrom itself: Farhoud - Baghdad's Krystalnacht


For more information about the Farhoud and the Iraqi coup, see pro-Axis coup and the Farhoud.

Click here to read more about Saul Fathi and Full Circle

Copyright

Excerpt from "Full Circle" Copyright by Saul Fathi. All Rights Reserved.


Copyright by Saul Silas Fathi, 2005. Please link to this Web page at http://zionism-israel.com/ezine/Jews_Baghdad.htm and excerpt it. Do not copy it to your Website. Please forward this mail with this notice. Circulated by ZNN. To subscribe, send email to znn-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


Europese Unie stelt uitbreiden banden met Israël uit

 
Velen zien Israels blokkade van de Gazastrook als onmenselijk, en vinden dat de druk op Israel moet worden opgevoerd om deze te beëindigen, los van wat Hamas doet. Er is echter een manier waarop er morgen alweer meer goederen worden doorgelaten, en de grenzen zich dagelijks verder zouden openen tot volledige opening binnen enkele weken: een einde aan de raketaanvallen, aan het leggen van mijnen langs de grens en pogingen Israel te infilteren door Hamas of andere 'militanten'. Israels beleid is erop gericht het Hamasbewind in Gaza te verzwakken en de bevolking te laten zien dat zij met een regime dat gericht is op geweld tegen Israel geen toekomst heeft, maar ook op het voorkomen van de verdere opbouw van Hamas' militaire capaciteiten en het verijdelen van aanslagen en infiltratie in Israel.  
 
Waarom voert de EU de druk op Hamas niet op om eindelijk aan haar eigen voorwaarden, erkenning van Israel, afzweren van geweld en accepteren van door de PLO en Israel gesloten akkoorden, te voldoen? De druk op Israel opvoeren betekent automatisch dat men Hamas in de kaart speelt en verder versterkt in haar huidige beleid.
 
Het is betreurenswaardig dat de EU voor Hamas heeft gekozen. Op verschillende weblogs en fora kwam ik oproepen tegen om EU parlementariers aan te schrijven en hen op te roepen tegen de intensievere samenwerking met Israel te stemmen. De antizionistische lobby aan het werk dus. Waar precies was die o zo machtige duistere Israellobby?
 
RP
-------------
 

European vote of confidence for Hamas regime

It was a bit worse than is portrayed here. The vote was taken at the request of the European United Left/Nordic Green Left and supported by the Greens/European Free Alliance and European Socialists to vote for the isolation of Israel. The vote, 194 in favor of the postponement against 173, is seen in the parliament as a "sanction" against Israel for its blockade of the Gaza Strip. In other words, it is a vote of confidence for the Hamas. (A.I.)

Israel rebuffed by Europe

By Lisa Hostein · December 4, 2008

The European Parliament postponed a decision this week about whether to upgrade its ties with Israel, ostensibly because of Israel's recent actions on the West Bank. While Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni was in Brussels urging European nations to change their "outdated" perception of the Jewish state, Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad warned the E.U. against boosting ties, citing the lack of progress in the Middle East peace process. A top German member of the European Parliament criticized the postponement....

Postponement of Israel Protocol strongly criticised

- European Parliament should proceed to ratification in January.

Elmar Brok MEP, foreign policy coordinator of the European People's Party (EPP), has strongly criticised the postponement of the ratification of a protocol on Israeli participation in European Union programmes.

"This gives the wrong signal and does not contribute to the stabilisation of the region", he commented after the EP-plenary decision.

Brok also criticised the reason that was given for the postponement of the decision, namely the situation in the Gaza Strip, as this means supporting the illegal Hamas regime which is decisively responsible for the situation in Gaza and the shelling of Israel.

The German MEP therefore advised the European Parliament to launch a new ratification process in January 2009.

Luchtaanvallen tegen Qassam teams in Gazastrook

 
Het gebruikelijke kat- en muisspel waarbij Israel wel praat over een grote operatie, maar niet van plan lijkt die ook uit te voeren, en de Palestijnen wel roepen geinteresseerd in hervatting van het staakt-het-vuren te zijn, maar daar niet naar handelen.
 
RP
---------
 
IAF aircraft target Gaza Kassam crews as rocket attacks continue
 
Yaakov Katz , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
IAF aircraft on Saturday night carried out two air-strikes against Palestinian rocket-launching squads in the Gaza Strip. Palestinian sources reported that two terrorists were injured in the second attack, one of them critically.

Some 20 Kassam rockets and mortar shells pounded the western Negev over the weekend as Palestinian terror factions in the Gaza Strip intensified their attacks on Israel.

On Saturday night, a rocket was fired into Ashkelon without causing any injuries or damage.

Another rocket struck Sderot, and the others hit open areas near the city and within the Gaza Strip. No casualties or damage were reported.

Palestinian groups said the weekend rocket barrage was in response to violence by settler against Arabs in Hebron, which broke out Thursday night following the evacuation of the city's disputed Beit Hashalom.

Defense officials said that despite the escalation in rocket attacks, Defense Minister Ehud Barak was not in favor of a large IDF operation in the Gaza Strip.

In recent weeks, one of Barak's top aides, Amos Gilad, has held a number of high-level talks with the Egyptians about extending the cease-fire between Israel and Hamas, which is due to expire on December 19.

"Now is not the time for a large-scale operation, although this could change the moment many people are killed in a Kassam attack," one official said Saturday.

Palestinians claimed that an IDF tank shell had killed a Popular Resistance Committees operative in central Gaza. The IDF denied the report and said that its tanks did not fire into Gaza on Saturday.

Also Saturday, Egyptian police found a massive arms cache in Sinai, according to the Falastin al-Youm news Web site.

According to the report, Egyptian troops found two weapons caches in the north and center of the peninsula, one of which, buried deep underground, contained more than 250 kilograms of dynamite. In the other cache, 211 anti-aircraft missile shells were discovered.

The weapons were in all likelihood intended for the Gaza Strip, and the smugglers who hid them in the desert were still at large.

The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund warned Saturday that Gaza's severe cash shortage might cause local banks to collapse. The warnings came in response to Israel's continued refusal to allow Palestinian banks to transfer cash to their Gaza branches.

The cash shortage means thousands of Palestinian civil servants may not be able to withdraw their salaries before the Id el-Adha holiday this week.

Monetary officials estimate Gaza banks hold less than a quarter of the cash needed to pay government wages.
 

Jerusalem Post staff and AP contributed to this report
 

zaterdag 6 december 2008

Israel bezorgd over rapport Amerikaanse denk-tank over Iran

 
Israel houdt ook rekening met de mogelijkheid dat zij zonder Amerikaanse goedkeuring tegen Iran zal moeten optreden.
 
_________________

Restoring the Balance A Middle East Strategy for the Next President
Richard N. Haass and Martin S. Indyk, Brookings Institution Press 2008 c. 288pp.
www.brookings.edu/press/Books/2008/restoringthebalance.aspx
 
Chapter - A Time for Diplomatic Renewal Toward a New U.S. Strategy in the Middle East
www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/Press/Books/2008/restoringthebalance/restoringthebalance_chapter.pdf
 
 
Think-tank comments on Iran worry Israel
 
HILARY LEILA KRIEGER and HERB KEINON , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
Israeli officials expressed concern Wednesday about some of the recommendations in a report top American experts have prepared on Middle East policy for the Obama administration, including expanding engagement with Iran and possible responses should Teheran acquire nuclear capabilities.

The report, drafted by the Council on Foreign Relations and the Brookings Institution, will be a major focus of the latter's Saban Center for Middle East Policy forum this weekend for top US and Israeli officials, as Washington heavy hitters try to play a role in shaping the policies of the next administration.

Foreign Ministry officials weren't thrilled about the report's recommendations, but downplayed its significance.

"We have nothing to be afraid of," one official said, refuting those who expressed fear that this report would become Obama's diplomatic road map. "Obama is surrounding himself with people who we know - from Hillary Clinton, to Rahm Emanuel, to James Jones. There is no reason to panic.

"It could be that the new administration's policy will be different from the Bush administration's; in fact, it will be a little different. But that doesn't mean it will be against Israel."

The official remarked that the report would likely be passed around by Obama subordinates, along with many other similar documents being prepared over the transition period. It was unrealistic, he said, to think Obama is going to internalize this report's findings and make them his own policies.

Still, the Saban gathering draws together international figures of the highest order and leading thinkers and experts on Middle East issues. US President George W. Bush is set to give his valedictory speech on the region at the weekend event, being held in Washington.

Despite Bush's presence, the report is blunt in assessing that current US policies toward Iran have "failed." Instead, the report calls for direct engagement with Iran, to begin at a low level as soon as possible.

Though it acknowledges that diplomacy is not a cure-all, it considers diplomacy more likely than other options - including a military attack and regime change - to productively manage Iran's nuclear ambitions.

A separate chapter on Iran estimates that the country won't be capable of producing a credible nuclear weapons option for another two to three years, during which increased sanctions alongside engaged diplomacy are advocated.

But, it adds, "If diplomacy or force fails to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, a declared US nuclear umbrella for the region or parts of it should be a key mechanism for deterring Iran, reassuring Israel, and incorporating our other allies into an effective regional balance."

Martin Indyk, who heads the Saban Center and co-wrote the report's introductory section - though he didn't author the chapters dealing with specific countries - explained the latter recommendation as potentially helping to synchronize the American and Israeli time frames on Iran.

Speaking to the press after the report was unveiled on Tuesday, Indyk said that the US and Israel have different deadlines for dealing with the threat of a nuclear Iran, because Israel sees the issue as an existential one while the US sees room to maneuver, even if Tehran did acquire some nuclear capabilities.

By the US providing security guarantees, such as a nuclear umbrella, he argued, it could reassure Jerusalem and "buy more time" for diplomacy to work.

Indyk also backed US support for Israeli-Syrian negotiations that are already under way through a third party, Turkey.

He suggested that they could strengthen the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian peace process, since a price for an agreement would be Syria cutting its ties to radical Islamic parties and Iran, whose influence the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority also wants to see diminish as part of its effort to tame Hamas.

In its chapter on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the report contends that Hamas needs to be brought back into a Palestinian national unity government to try to reshape its current role as a spoiler.

The report doesn't push the US to recognize Hamas, but suggests mediation by the Arab countries between the rival Palestinian parties.

Indyk also said the current Annapolis process could continue to provide a good framework for moving forward on the Israeli-Palestinian issue.

Richard Haass, president of CFR and the co-author of the introduction, agreed that there were positive aspects of Bush's policies that shouldn't be thrown out in the new administration's haste to turn the page.

"It's important that the administration not start with an ABB approach - anything but Bush," he said.

 
 
*** Balanced Middle East News ***
MidEastweb
http://www.mideastweb.org
Subscribe - mail to mewnews-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

MewBkd - Background & analysis -
mail to
Mewbkd-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

News Letter -  our commentary -
mail to
mideastweb-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

IDF onderzoekt opties voor aanval op nucleaire doelen Iran

 
Een Israëlische functionaris meent dat het regime in Iran geen 10 jaar meer zal standhouden. Laten we het met hem hopen. Toen de Shah van (toen nog) Perzië in 1979 ten val werd gebracht, waren velen blij, want hij gold als een wrede dictator. Toen de Ayatollahs de macht kregen was het snel gedaan met het enthousiasme.
 
Wouter
__________

The Jerusalem Post
Dec 4, 2008 0:40 | Updated Dec 4, 2008 16:30
 
 
The IDF is drawing up options for a strike on Iranian nuclear facilities that do not include coordination with the United States, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

While its preference is to coordinate with the US, defense officials have said Israel is preparing a wide range of options for such an operation.

"It is always better to coordinate," one top Defense Ministry official explained last week. "But we are also preparing options that do not include coordination."

Israeli officials have said it would be difficult, but not impossible, to launch a strike against Iran without receiving codes from the US Air Force, which controls Iraqi airspace. Israel also asked for the codes in 1991 during the First Gulf War, but the US refused.

"There are a wide range of risks one takes when embarking on such an operation," a top Israeli official said.

Several news reports have claimed recently that US President George W. Bush has refused to give Israel a green light for an attack on Iranian facilities. One such report, published in September in Britain's Guardian newspaper, claimed that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert requested a green light to attack Iran in May but was refused by Bush.

In September, a Defense News article on an early warning radar system the US recently sent to Israel quoted a US government source who said the X-band deployment and other bilateral alliance-bolstering activities send parallel messages: "First, we want to put Iran on notice that we're bolstering our capabilities throughout the region, and especially in Israel. But just as important, we're telling the Israelis, 'Calm down, behave. We're doing all we can to stand by your side and strengthen defenses, because at this time, we don't want you rushing into the military option.'"

The "US European Command (EUCOM) has deployed to Israel a high-powered X-band radar and the supporting people and equipment needed for coordinated defense against Iranian missile attack, marking the first permanent US military presence on Israeli soil," Defense News wrote. The radar will shave several precious minutes off Israel's reaction time to an Iranian missile launch.

In a related article at about the same time, TIME magazine raised the possibility that through the deployment of the radar, America wants to keep an eye on Israeli airspace, so that the US is not surprised if and when the IAF is sent to bomb Iran, a scenario Washington wants to avoid.

The US army sent 120 EUCOM personnel to Israel's Nevatim Air Base southeast of Beersheba to man the new radar.

Last week, Iran's nuclear chief Gholam Reza Aghazadeh revealed that the country was operating more than 5,000 centrifuges at its uranium enrichment plant in Natanz and would continue to install centrifuges and enrich uranium to produce nuclear fuel for the country's future nuclear power plants.

"At this point, more than 5,000 centrifuges are operating in Natanz," said Aghazadeh, who is also the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran. This represents a significant increase from the 4,000 Iran had said were up and running in August at the plant.

The Islamic republic has said it plans to move toward large-scale uranium enrichment that will ultimately involve 54,000 centrifuges.

Israeli officials said last week that the drop in oil prices and the continued sanctions on Iran were having an effect, although they had yet to stop Teheran's nuclear program. The officials said that while Iran was making technological advancements, it would not have the necessary amount of highly-enriched uranium for a nuclear bomb until late 2009.

"There is still time and there is no need to rush into an operation right now," another Israeli official said. "The regime there is already falling apart and will likely no longer be in power 10 years from now."

The IAF was preparing for a wide range of options, OC Air Force Maj.-Gen. Ido Nehushtan recently said, adding that all it would take to launch an operation was a decision by the political echelon.

"The air force is a very robust and flexible force," he told Der Spiegel. "We are ready to do whatever is demanded of us."

On Monday, Teheran dismissed the possibility of an Israeli strike, saying it didn't take Israel seriously.

"We think that regional and international developments and the complicated situation faced by Israel itself will not allow it to launch military strikes against other countries," Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi told reporters in Teheran, according to the Press TV Web site. "Israel makes threats to promote its psychological and media warfare," he said.
 

Palestijnen protesteren tegen vernielingen door kolonisten Hebron

 
Laten we hopen dat dit geen trend wordt, want er zijn nog heel wat nederzettingen te ontruimen op de Westoever...
 
__________________________
 

Last update - 23:58 05/12/2008       
Palestinians protest rampage by Hebron settlers
 
 
 
Palestinians protested on Friday against a rampage by settlers in response to Israel's eviction of squatters from a disputed building in Hebron, and Israel deployed extra forces to contain the unrest.
 
Palestinian youths burned tyres in Hebron and threw stones at Israel Defense Forces soldiers at a checkpoint, who responded with tear gas and rubber bullets, witnesses said.
 
Violence spread to another West Bank town where Palestinians said settlers torched olive orchards, a day after settlers shot and wounded three Palestinians in anger at the removal of Israeli families from a building occupied in defiance of a court order.

Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malki accused the settlers of "waging war" on Palestinians and urged the United Nations Security Council to take up the issue. Malki told reporters in the West Bank town of Ramallah that settlers were taking advantage of a power vacuum since Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's recent resignation in a corruption probe.
 
Olmert is staying on as caretaker premier with limited power until a Feb. 10 Knesset election. Until then, Israel seems "too weak to take any action against settlers", Malki said.
 
Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann called the settlers' assaults a "shocking pogrom" and told Channel One television "I regret very much the security forces weren't prepared to prevent" them.
 
Robert Serry, the UN envoy for the Middle East, issued a statement saying he was "concerned about the potential escalation". He demanded "an immediate end to the settler attacks and restraint and calm from all parties".
 
Serry also urged "vigilance from the Israeli authorities to ensure that the events of yesterday are not repeated".
 
Tensions have flared in Hebron since settlers defied a Nov. 16 court order to vacate a house they said they had bought from a Palestinian man who denied ever selling it.
 
Israel sent in club-wielding troops to remove a dozen settler families from the building on Thursday, after days of stone-throwing protests there between Palestinians and settlers.
 
Israel reinforced security in Hebron by deploying 500 riot police on Friday, police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said.
 
Some restrictions were also imposed on Palestinians. Rosenfeld said Palestinians under 45 were barred from attending Friday prayers at al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem to prevent any violence from spreading there.
 
Some violence was reported on Friday but there were no reports of injuries.
 
Palestinian witnesses said settlers set fire to hundreds of olive trees near the town of Qalqilya on Friday, near the scene of similar torchings on Thursday.
 
Palestinians said settlers had erected makeshift roadblocks on several roads in the territory on Thursday, blocking their travel.
 
Border Police stood guard outside the padlocked disputed house in Hebron on Friday, allowing settlers in only to remove their belongings from the building.
 
Faiz Rajabi, the building's owner, said he had not yet regained access. "I am waiting to get my house back," he told television stations.


*** Balanced Middle East News ***
MidEastweb
http://www.mideastweb.org
Subscribe - mail to mewnews-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

MewBkd - Background & analysis -
mail to Mewbkd-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

News Letter -  our commentary -
mail to mideastweb-subscribe@yahoogroups.com