woensdag 24 september 2008

Join the Army: Israel heeft idealisten nodig

 
Israel heeft idealisten en mensen die bereid zijn een - soms zeer zwaar - offer te brengen voor het welzijn en voortbestaan van hun land, meer nodig dan veel andere landen, zoals Israel ook meer afhankelijk is van steun in het buitenland dan andere landen. Een organisatie die oproept dienst te weigeren zonder een alternatief als sociale dienstplicht voor te stellen, is dan ook te verglijken met een organisatie die oproept de belasting te ontduiken. 
 
RP
------------  

Israel needs idealists
Army or national service is indeed a sacrifice, but Israel won't exist without it

Adi Dvir
Published:  09.21.08, 18:14 / Israel Opinion

 
Recently I had the eye-opening experience of speaking to a "pacifist" who informed me that armies were bad. For this reason, she said, she had refused to enlist in the IDF, as it tended to perpetuate militarism and war – hence its inherent "badness."

Apparently many such pacifists exist in our country, and some of them are spreading their ideology online, as I discovered after reading about an organization called New Profile.

"We – a group of feminists including both women and men – know that we can live in a country without soldiers," New Profile states on its homepage. "Israel can devote itself to a policy of peace. It can stop being a military society." The site goes on to recommend draft dodging techniques, specifically underlining medical, psychological, and motivational issues that "decrease the applicant's value" in the army's eyes.
 
New Profile will soon be investigated on suspicion of incitement against the IDF, very deservedly, in this writer's opinion. However, in defense of the wayward group, one of its members said something thought-provoking. He argued that the organization was not responsible for spreading draft-dodging among Israeli youths, but rather, that it only assisted those who had already decided the army was not for them in escaping its clutches.

His words rang true in the sense that not everyone is cut out for military service, especially not in combat units. However, we must recall that the IDF's role far surpasses that of an army in the traditional sense of the word. In fact, the military in Israel constitutes a fundamental social force.

New Profile seems to have forgotten that aside from providing our country with much-needed defense against enemy nations that threaten us daily, it also provides many underprivileged youths with teachers, is responsible for sending volunteers to offer aid to humanitarian organizations, and even helps young musicians launch their careers (some of Israel's most memorable singers started out in one of the various IDF bands.) Even the nation's most popular radio station is brought to us courtesy of our men (and women) in green.

Aside from aiding society in general, the IDF teaches its soldiers social responsibility which, as many US university recruiters have admitted, makes them admirable candidates for scholarships abroad. In fact, the IDF education and experience may be one of the reasons that the number of scouts searching Israel's schools for MA applicants has hit an all-time high this year.

Screening policy

The IDF's role as a social mechanism in Israeli society is precisely why there should be no such thing as a "conscientious objector." Let those who prefer not to bear arms and man military outposts become teachers, tour guides, and environmental volunteers for a few years.

This would of course require the army's participation. The IDF needs to come up with a screening policy that would allow those not necessarily cut out for the type of military service that entails a commander yelling orders in your ear to contribute to society in other ways, without coercing them into something that goes against their nature. Enlistment for obligatory national service should be the only alternative for those who don't join the ranks of the IDF, and this should be enforced in all strata and sectors of society.

It seems to me that if New Profile is so adamant about assisting its followers in dodging the draft, the group should also be spreading the word about other ways in which youths can contribute to our country.
  
If they had provided links to volunteer organizations or national service programs' sites, I may have viewed them differently.

Anyone who lives in Israel must contribute to its wellbeing, and taking the draft-dodging or national service-dodging path, in this society, should be tantamount to a refusal to pay taxes. Israel has survived largely on idealism and sacrifice since its inception, and we have still not arrived at a point where we can sit back and allow ourselves to relinquish these ideals. Yes, the price is high, but it is the price we must pay to live here. This country cannot yet accommodate non-idealists. Those who refuse to contribute, in any way, should come back when we idealists have matters under control.
 

dinsdag 23 september 2008

Ontmoeting tussen families van slachtoffers conflict Israël - Palestijnen

 
Elkaars pijn, grieven, angsten en problemen begrijpen. Hoe soft dat ook klinkt, het is noodzakelijk om tot vrede en verzoening te komen.
Ondanks alle geweld en haat zijn er groepen die dit nastreven en er op kleine schaal in slagen mensen bij elkaar te brengen en begrip en empathie voor elkaar op te brengen.

RP
---------

Israeli, Palestinian bereaved families meet

Victims from both sides of Israeli-Palestian conflict meet to share experiences, hardships. According to chairman of 'Parents Circle', 'promoting dialogue amongst ordinary people key to change'

Anat Shalev - Ynet News
Published:  09.21.08, 17:41
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3599864,00.html

 
This weekend a series of meetings between Jewish and Palestinian families was held under the auspices of the "Parents Circle," a group connecting bereaved families from both sides.

The Palestinians listened to the accounts of families of individuals who were killed by Qassam rockets, while the Israelis heard stories from Palestinian parents who have lost their children in the West Bank village of Naalin. Both sides agreed that peace must prevail to stop the bloodshed.

"Our organization is very special," said Nir Oren, the Israeli chairman of the Parents Circle. "Everyone of us has lost a family member as a result of the conflict. Each one of us is working for peace so that neither side will gain more bereaved families."

The delegation at the Kdoshim family home (Photo: Sharon Mishkyer)

Oren said that on Saturday a group of 20 Palestinians and 10 Israelis visited the Kibbutz Kfar Aza home of the late Jimmy Kdoshim, who was killed by a mortar round. "The encounter was exciting, and everyone sympathized with the pain Jimmy's family was going through and the fear of rockets that still looms over this kibbutz," he said.

The second encounter took place in the village of Naalin. The group visited the homes of Ahmed Musa and Yousef Amera, who were killed during demonstrations against the construction of Israel's security barrier. "They (Palestinians) told us about how the (security) fence is affecting their daily life, we toured the area where the fence will be constructed and heard their reservations," added Oren.

"We are dealing with people who are losing their livelihood. Ahmed's father told us that he is only interested in peace, his land and bringing the person who shot his son to justice. It's only been 40 days and he is speaking with a tone of appeasement," he said.

Oren added, "the residents of the village understand the security interest in putting up the fence and they are only fighting to change its route. The Israeli group even had a settler who told us stories about living with the Palestinians from the village."

'Get dialogue going '
After the meeting, a ceremony was held in Beit Jala where peace activists were cited for their work. One of the recipients was Ismail Hatib, who donated his son's organs to an Israeli. Hatib said, "The most important thing in the world is human life. If I lost my son and I can help another human being, Israeli or Palestinian, that is what is important."

Co-chairman Abu Awwad then spoke about his delegation's experiences while visiting Kibbutz Kfar Aza and said, "We talked to the residents about the co-existence and agricultural cooperation that occurred prior to the year 2000 and how the only contact now is through violence.

"We later visited Jimmy Kdoshim's widow. It was very difficult to hear about her experiences. She lives with the images of the event and we can sympathize with her because we have all been there. My brothers were killed by the IDF, everyone in the Palestinian delegation sympathized and opened up about their own experiences," he said.

"What makes her story more tragic," said the Palestinian chairman, "is that she and her husband worked towards peace and deliberation between the two sides.

"We continued to discuss the different factors and the situation itself and how we can promote dialogue. The important thing is that we get dialogue going between us, the ordinary people. We need to understand each other, with the main problem being the dislike for the different. As soon as we change that, we can move that change further up the ladder," said Abu Awwad.
 
 

Palestijnse opiniepeiling: krap helft voor voortzetten vredesonderhandelingen

 
Onderstaande enquete lijkt tegenstrijdige resultaten te geven wat betreft de volgende twee vragen:
 
Do you support or reject the creation of two states on the historic land of Palestine (a Palestinian state and Israel)?
42.5% I support
54.3% I reject
3.2% No opinion/I do not know

Do you support or reject the creation of a Palestinian state on the 1967 occupied territories?
67.1% I support
29.6% I reject
3.4% No opinion/I do not know

 
Een verklaring hiervoor is dat men eerst een Palestijnse staat op de Westoever en Gazastrook wil creëren, en daarna eventueel in de rest van het gebied tussen de Middellandse Zee en de Jordaan (lees: Israël), wat ook lange tijd de officiele strategie van de PLO is geweest. De felle anti-Israël retoriek en oproepen tot bevrijding van het gehele land in zowel aan Fatah als Hamas geliëerde media geven dit vermoeden extra geloofwaardigheid.  
 
RP
--------------


An-Najah National University
Center for Opinion Polls and Survey Studies

Tel: (972) (9) 2345113 / Fax: (972)(9) 2345982
Nablus - Palestinian: P.O.Box 7, 707
Email:
Polls@najah.edu hussein596@yahoo.com
Results of Palestinian Public Opinion Poll
No. 35 18-20 September 2008
 

Background
 
The Palestinian political realities are still suffering from a sate of division between the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and the division is intensified by a verbal conflict that escalates with the approaching end of President Mahmoud Abbas's term. Several legal councilors and advisors assert that the President's term ends simultaneously with the term of the PLC in January 2010. Others, however, say that the President's term ends in January of 2009
 
On the other side of the Palestinian scene, Palestinian Israeli negotiations are stand still; they do not show any progress. More than one Palestinian official declared that the negotiations are not going to lead to the creation of a Palestinian state by the end of this year as envisioned by the United States and other participants in these negotiations.
 
As for the truce (hudna) in the Gaza Strip between Hamas and the Israeli Government, all parties are still satisfied with their commitment to the conditions of the truce. Some evasions of ceasefire occur every now and then and several Palestinian factions in the Strip declared more than once that the truce is fragile and that Israel is not committed to its terms and conditions.
 
The Results
 
Following are the results of the Palestinian Public Opinion Poll No. 35 conducted by the Center for Opinion Polls and Survey Studies at An-Najah National University during the period from 18-20 September 2008. The University sponsors all polls conducted by its Center.
 
Palestinian public opinion poll no. 35 undertakes the current political realities especially the Palestinian presidential and, PLC elections, the truce (hudna) between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, the peace negotiations, the suggested Arab troops, the attempts for reconciliations between Fateh and Hamas in addition to political affiliations and other issues.
 
The sample included 1360 persons whose age group is 18 and above and who have the right to vote. The enclosed questionnaire was distributed on 860 persons from the West Bank and 500 persons from the Gaza Strip. The sample was drawn randomly and the margin of error is about ±3%; still 3.8% of the members of the sample refused to answer the questionnaire.
 
_____________________________________________________________________
 
The opinions represented in the results reflect those of the study; they do not, by any means, represent the opinion of An-Najah National University.
 
 
The General Results:

61.1% of respondents supported dissolving the PLC; 29.6% rejected.
20.1% of respondents supported conducting presidential elections at the end of the current President's term; 77.5% rejected
50.7% of respondents supported continuing negotiations under their present conditions between the Palestinian Authority and Israel.
18.4% of respondents believed that the present PLC members are performing their duties as required of them.
42.4% of respondents supported allowing Arab troops to enter the Gaza Strip.
52.7% of respondents supported the position of Palestinian factions who oppose allowing Arab troops to enter the West Bank.
30.1% of respondents supported allowing Arab troops to enter the West Bank.
27.4% of respondents supported allowing Arab troops to enter the West Bank and the Gaza Strip simultaneously.
71.5% of respondents supported the truce (hudna) between Hamas and Israel by which Hamas stops firing rockets against Israel and, in return, Israel stops its military operations in the Gaza Strip.
37.1% of respondents believed that if Hamas accepts a truce with Israel, it would mean a retreat from the armed struggle option.
40.4% of respondents believed that the Palestinian factions in the Gaza Strip accepted willingly the truce that Hamas declared.
48.8% of respondents believed that the truce between Hamas and Israel is an introduction to direct negotiations on the future of the Gaza Strip
54.9% of respondents believed that Fateh Movement is serious in its call for a comprehensive national reconciliation
39.2% of respondents believed that Hamas Movement is serious in its call for a comprehensive national reconciliation
58.2% of respondents believed that the Palestinian public are ready to bring a national reconciliation to a success.
51.8% of respondents believed that the Palestinian leaderships of all factions are serious in their intentions to bring a national reconciliation to a success.
54.9% of respondents believed that the Palestinian Presidency is serious in its call for a national reconciliation.
36.5% of respondents believed that the Arab attempts towards making a reconciliation between Fateh and Hamas will succeed.
27.6% of respondents supported the suggestion that calls for the formation of a Hashemite Jordanian-Palestinian kingdom.
41.7% of respondents supported dissolving the Palestinian Authority.
22.6% of respondents believed that Hamas is the responsible party before Palestinians for the on-going internal division; 14.6% believed that Fateh is the responsible party while 52% believed that some persons inside the two movements are responsible.
42.5% of respondents supported the creation of two states on the land of historic Palestine (a Palestinian state and Israel).
67.1% of respondents supported the creation of a Palestinian state on the 1967 occupied Palestinian territories.
36% of respondents believed that the negotiations that President Mahmoud Abbas conducts will lead to the creation of a Palestinian state on the 1967 occupied territories.
32.9% of respondents believed that Palestinian resistance in its present shape will lead to the creation of a Palestinian state on the 1967 occupied territories.
61.2% of respondents assessed the performance of the Palestinian Presidency at the present time as "good".
Regardless of legitimacy or illegitimacy, 57.3% of respondent supported the general policy of the care-taker government of Salam Fayyad.
Regardless of legitimacy or illegitimacy, 29% of respondents supported the general policy of the dissolved government of Ismael Haniyeh.
58.6% of respondents assessed the performance of the care-taker government of Salam Fayyad as "good".
29.4% of respondents assessed the performance of the dissolved government of Ismael Haniyeh as "good".
76.9% of respondents said that they will participate in the coming presidential elections. From among those who said they will participate, 38.5% said that they will give their votes to Fateh's candidate; 17.4% said they will give their votes to Hamas' candidate.
78.1% of respondents said that they will participate in the coming legislative elections. From among those who said they will participate, 37.9% said that they will give their votes to Fateh's candidates; 17.7% said they will give their votes to Hamas' candidates.
If PLC elections are to be conducted, 42.9% of respondents expected the winning of Fateh movement; 17.2% expected the winning of Hamas.
78.2% of respondents supported the formation of a transitional government whose aim will be to prepare for and supervise Presidential and PLC elections
61% of respondents believed that the Palestinian security forces are capable of imposing order and the rule of law on the areas in which they were redeployed.
71.3% of respondents supported the notion that Palestinian arms must only be in the hands of the Palestinian security apparatuses.
52.7% of respondents expressed fear for their lives under the present circumstances.
37.2% of respondents said that the current security, political and economic conditions will drive them to emigrate.
61.2% of respondents said that they are pessimistic of the general Palestinian situation at this stage.
77% of respondents said that they neither feel safe for themselves nor for their families and properties under the current circumstances.
 
As for political affiliation respondents gave the following results:
 People's Party 0.7%
 Democratic Front 1.0%
 Islamic Jihad 2.1%
 Fateh 36.0%
 Hamas 14.4%
 Fida 0.1%
 Popular Front 3.5%
 Palestinian National Initiative 0.7%
 I am an independent nationalist 6.7%
 I am an independent Islamist 2.9%
 None of the above 30.8%
 Others 1.0%


The General Results of the Poll

Do you support or reject dissolving the PLC?
23.2% I strongly support
37.9% I support
23.4% I reject
6.2% I strongly reject
6.3% No opinion/I do not know

Do you support or reject conducting new Presidential elections by the end of the current president's term
14.0% I strongly support
6.1% I support
26.8% I reject
50.7% I strongly reject
2.5% No opinion/I do not know

Do you support or reject continuing negotiations under their present realities between the Palestinian Authority and Israel?
13.5% I strongly support
37.1% I support
33.4% I reject
13.5% I strongly reject
2.4% No opinion/I do not know

Do you think that the current PLC members are performing their duties as required of them?
18.4% Yes
70.4% No
11.3% No opinion/I do not know

Do you support or reject bringing Arab troops to the Gaza Strip?
12.8% I strongly support
29.6% I support
33.7% I reject
21.1% I strongly reject
2.8% No opinion/I do not know


Do you support or reject the position of Palestinian factions that oppose bringing Arab troops to the Gaza Strip?
17.4% I strongly support
35.3% I support
34.6% I reject
8.0% I strongly reject
4.7% No opinion/I do not know

Do you support or reject bringing Arab troops to the West Bank?
9.0% I strongly support
21.1% I support
45.7% I reject
21.0% I strongly reject
3.2% No opinion/I do not know


Do you support or reject sending Arab troops to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip simultaneously?
27.4% Yes
67.4% No
5.2% No opinion/I do not know


Hamas movement and Israel declared a truce in the Gaza Strip by which Hamas stops firing rockets against Israel and, in return, Israel stops its military operations in the Gaza Strip. Do you support or reject  this truce?
19.2% I strongly support
52.3% I support
17.8% I reject
8.5% I strongly reject
2.3% No opinion/I do not know


Do you think that by accepting the truce Hamas is retreating from the armed struggle option?
37.1% Yes
55.9% No
7.0% No opinion/I do not know


Do you think that the Palestinian factions in the Gaza Strip agreed willingly on the truce that Hamas declared?
40.4% They agreed willingly
39.9% They agreed under some pressure from Hamas
2.6% Other
17.1% No opinion/I do not know


Do you think that the truce between Hamas and Israel is an introduction to direct negotiations on the future of the Gaza Strip?
48.8% Yes
40.7% No
10.5% No opinion/I do not know


Do you think that Fateh movement is serious in its call for a comprehensive national reconciliation?
54.9% Yes
38.8% No
6.3% No opinion/I do not know


Do you think that Hamas movement is serious in its call for a comprehensive national reconciliation?
39.2% Yes
52.0% No
8.8% No opinion/I do not know


Do you think that the Palestinian public are ready to bring a national reconciliation to a success?
58.2% Yes
35.4% No
6.4% No opinion/I do not know


Do you think that the leaders of all Palestinian factions are really concerned with a successful national reconciliation?
51.8% Yes
39.9% No
8.2% No opinion/I do not know


Do you think that the Palestinian Presidency is serious in its call for a comprehensive national reconciliation?
54.9% Yes
37.5% No
7.6% No opinion/I do not know


There are several Arab attempts made towards achieving a reconciliation between Fateh and Hamas. Do you think that these attempts will succeed?
36.5% Yes
50.8% No
12.7% No opinion/I do not know


There has been a media proposition lately referring to the formation of a Hashemite Jordanian-Palestinian kingdom. Do you support or reject such proposition?
9.7% I strongly support
17.9% I support
34.0% I reject
32.8% I strongly reject
5.6% No opinion/I do not know


Do you support or reject dissolving the Palestinian Authority?
13.4% I strongly support
28.3% I support
37.6% I reject
16.5% I strongly reject
4.2% No opinion/I do not know


Who in your opinion from among Palestinians is responsible for the on-going internal Palestinian division?
14.6% Fateh movement
22.6% Hamas movement
52.0% Some persons from both movements
4.2% Other (specify)
6.6% No opinion/I do not know


Do you support or reject the creation of two states on the historic land of Palestine (a Palestinian state and Israel)?
42.5% I support
54.3% I reject
3.2% No opinion/I do not know

Do you support or reject the creation of a Palestinian state on the 1967 occupied territories?
67.1% I support
29.6% I reject
3.4% No opinion/I do not know


Do you think that the negotiations that President Mahmoud Abbas is conducting will lead to the creation of a Palestinian state on the 1967 occupied territories?
36.0% Yes
53.7% No
10.3% No opinion/I do not know


Do you think that the Palestinian resistance in its present form will lead to the creation of a Palestinian state on the 1967 occupied territories?
32.9% Yes
59.0% No
8.2% No opinion/I do not know


How do you assess the performance of the Palestinian Presidency at the present time?
61.2% Good
31.8% Bad
7.1% No opinion/I do not know


Regardless of its legitimacy or illegitimacy, do you support or reject the general policy of the Palestinian government led by Salam Fayyad?
57.3% I support
32.3% I reject
10.4% No opinion/I do not know


Regardless of its legitimacy or illegitimacy, do you support or reject the general policy of the dissolved government of Ismael Haniyeh?
29.0% I support
61.0% I reject
10.0% No opinion/I do not know


How do you assess the performance of Salam Fayyad's care-taker government?
58.6% Good
30.4% Bad
11.0% No opinion/I do not know


How do you assess the performance of Ismael Haniyeh's dissolved government?
29.4% Good
58.1% Bad
12.5% No opinion/I do not know


If presidential elections are held in the present time, to whom from among the following do you give your vote?
7.3% An independent candidate
2.8% A candidate from the left
13.4% A candidate from Hamas
29.6% A candidate from Fateh
6.0% A national independent candidate
3.7% An Islamic independent candidate
23.1% I will not participate in the elections
14.1% I have not decided yet


If new PLC elections are conducted, whom do you vote for?
6.1% An independent ticket
3.1% A ticket from the left
13.8% A ticket from Hamas
29.6% A ticket from Fateh
6.0% A national independent ticket
4.6% An Islamic independent ticket
21.9% I will not participate in the elections
14.9% I have not decided yet


If new legislative elections were to be held today, which of the following would win?
5.5% Independent Islamists bloc
7.9% Independent Nationalist bloc
42.9% Fateh bloc
17.2% Hamas bloc
2.0% A bloc from leftist organizations
24.5% No opinion/I do not know


Are you in favor of forming a transitional government for the purpose of preparing  for and supervising new presidential and PLC elections?
78.2% Yes
15.2% No
6.6% No opinion/I do not know


Do you think that the Palestinian security forces are capable of imposing law and order on the areas in which they were redeployed?
61.0% Yes
34.0% No
5.1% No opinion/I do not know


Do you support or reject the notion that Palestinian arms should be in the hands of Palestinian security apparatuses, and that any other arms in the hands of other Palestinian men will be considered arms for racketeering business?
71.3% I support
25.4% I reject
3.2% No opinion/I do not know


Are you worried about your life under the present circumstances?
52.7% Yes
46.1% No
1.2% No opinion/I do not know


Do the current security, political and economic circumstances urge you to emigrate?
37.2% Yes
62.0% No
0.8% No opinion/I do not know

Do the current security, political and economic circumstances urge you to emigrate?
West Bank
27.8% Yes
72.0% No
0.2% No opinion/I do not know

Gaza Strip
Do the current security, political and economic circumstances urge you to emigrate?
53.4% Yes
44.8% No
1.8% No opinion/I do not know

Are you pessimistic or optimistic towards the general Palestinian situation at this stage?
35.8% Optimistic
61.2% Pessimistic
3.0% No opinion/I do not know

Under the present circumstances, do you feel that you, your family and your properties are safe?
22.2% Yes
32.4% May be
44.6% No
0.8% No opinion/I do not know


Which of the following political affiliations do you support?
0.7% People's Party
1.0% Democratic Front
2.1% Islamic Jihad
36.0% Fateh
14.4% Hamas
0.1% Fida
3.5% Popular Front
0.7% Palestinian National Initiative
6.7% I am an independent nationalist
2.9% I am an independent Islamist
30.8% None of the above


--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

Balans van de regering Olmert

 
Wat heeft Olmert tijdens zijn regeerperiode bereikt? Haaretz maakt de balans op en die is niet erg positief. Het kan dus niet moeilijk zijn voor Livni om het beter te doen, mits het haar lukt een enigzins stabiele coalitie samen te stellen.
 
Voor een editorial lijkt onderstaande evaluatie wel erg politiek gekleurd. Misschien werd Olmert niet gekozen als Kadima-leider (de partij was nog in opbouw), maar met hem als lijsttrekker werd Kadima wel bij verre de grootste partij na de verkiezingen van maart 2006, iets wat bijvoorbeeld de LPF in Nederland niet lukte na het wegvallen van Pim Fortuyn. Het slechte presteren van het IDF in de Libanon oorlog is zeker niet alleen Olmert aan te rekenen, maar kwam ook door jarenlange nalatigheid en de door Netanyahu in het vorige kabinet doorgevoerde bezuinigingen. Ook dat het vredesproces geen milimeter is opgeschoten onder Olmert's bewind bestrijdt ik. Sharon weigerde met de PA te praten en kwam daarom met de formule van eenzijdige terugtrekking op de proppen. Onder Olmert worden al driekwart jaar moeizame onderhandelingen met de Palestijnen gevoerd, die zo niet dit jaar, dan toch hopelijk volgend jaar tot een akkoord zouden kunnen leiden. De Haaretz redaktie is zo cynisch of gefrustreerd dat ze Olmert geen greintje krediet willen geven. Dat is ook beter voor de krantenverkoop, want Olmert is waarschijnlijk wel de meest impopulaire premier tot nu toe.
 

Wouter
__________________

Olmert's term
 
 
The State of Israel has known many governments in its 60 years of existence, yet it is doubtful whether it has ever known a worse one than that of Ehud Olmert, which came to its end yesterday. Its balance sheet, after two years and nine months, comes very close to zero.

Olmert was not elected to his post; he inherited the job from Ariel Sharon when Sharon fell ill. As Sharon's successor at the head of Kadima, a party that was concocted from members of Likud and Labor, Olmert led the faction to a humble achievement, winning less than one-fourth of all Knesset seats, though that sufficed to form a government. In filling the most senior posts, Olmert acted bizarrely: He named Abraham Hirchson to the Finance Ministry, Amir Peretz as defense minister and Haim Ramon as justice minister. The results were not long in coming.

Hirchson resigned after being suspected of corruption, while Peretz failed in his job as defense minister, particularly in his handling of the war in Lebanon. He also lost the leadership of the Labor Party. Ramon chose to duel with the Supreme Court and, after being convicted of an indecent sexual act against a female soldier, was removed from his post, only to be promoted to the job of vice premier.

In Ramon's stead, Olmert named Prof. Daniel Friedmann, who served as a battering ram against the judicial system which he was supposed to defend. It is difficult to determine the extent of the damage Friedmann will leave behind, but his contribution to the public's loss of faith in the justice system and the rule of law is clear even now.

Yet the biggest disappointment lies in the diplomatic and security realm. Just a few months after the government was sworn in, Olmert decided, with the support of his cabinet, to embark on a hastily conceived, large-scale military operation in Lebanon, following the abduction of two soldiers on the northern border. Both sections of the Winograd Committee's report revealed the depth of the failure of the decision-making process, as well as the lack of preparedness of the Israel Defense Forces and its Home Front Command in what would become the Second Lebanon War. Despite all this, the prime minister clung to his chair and refused to acknowledge his responsibility for the failures, even after the resignations of Peretz and IDF chief of staff Dan Halutz.

On the Palestinian front, the government's talks with Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) were hesitant and futile. Despite Olmert's proclamations of progress toward a "shelf agreement," it soon became clear that this, too, was a case of empty words, nothing more. In the Gaza Strip, on the other hand, Olmert was forced to accept a truce with Hamas on controversial terms. Even on the Syrian track, where there are some signs of progress, Olmert struggled to advance the talks to the negotiation stage. He wraps up his tenure with Israel no closer to peace, on any front, than it was prior to his taking office.

His greatest failure, though, is what now seems like a chain of alleged crimes, and it is these that brought his term to an early end. He is suspected, inter alia, of serious crimes such as bribery; fraud and breach of trust under aggravating circumstances; money laundering; and more. His personal conduct, which reflected his hedonism and greed, shadowed his performance as prime minister. The premiership, in his words, was his "place of work." One can only hope that Israel's next prime minister understands the importance of the challenges facing the country and views the job as a mission in service to the public. 
 
 

Tzipi Livni als bloeddorstige Mona Lisa in PA krant

 
Dit is hoe de gematigde vredelievende Palestijnse Autoriteit van Machmoed Abbas de mogelijk nieuwe Israelische premier verwelkomt. Als zij van een extreem-rechtse fractie zou zijn en transfer van de Arabieren had voorgesteld, dan was dat tot daar aan toe. Livni is een groot voorstander van onderhandelingen met de Palestijnen en een twee-statenoplossing, en zij voert sinds de Annapolis conferentie vorig jaar november onderhandelingen met de PA. Onderstaande cartoon is dan ook niet alleen smakeloos, maar een belediging in het gezicht van de officiele gesprekspartner van de Palestijnse delegatie. Al Hayat Al Jadida is de officiële krant van de Palestijnse Autoriteit.
 
RP
-------------------

Bulletin
Sep. 22, 2008
Palestinian Media Watch

PA daily:Tzipi Livni with blood-stained knife
By Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook
 
Palestinian Media Watch:
p:+972 2 625 4140 e:
pmw@pmw.org.il
f: +972 2 624 2803 w: www.pmw.org.il
 
 
Caricature in official Palestinian Authority newspaper.


The Palestinian Authority published a caricature today in its official newspaper, in which Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni is portrayed with a dagger and blood-stained hands next to a white peace dove with its head in a noose. As a result of Prime Minister Olmert's resignation and her election as leader of the Kadima party, Livni has been designated to to try to form the next Israeli government, and could be the next prime minister.

Bottom text from right: "Gio-Kadima"
This is a play on words: Livni's political party is called "Kadima." The original Italian name of Mona Lisa is "La Gioconda."

 
[Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, Sep. 22, 2008
for caricature:
www.alhayat-j.com/cartoon/20080922char.jpg ]
 

19 Gewonden bij aanslag met auto in Jeruzalem


Dit is de derde aanval in Jeruzalem dit jaar waarin met een voertuig op een menigte wordt ingereden. Bij eerdere aanvallen vielen ook doden.

-------------------------

Last update - 02:48 23/09/2008

19 hurt as terrorist plows car into Jerusalem crowd

By Jonathan Lis and Amos Harel, Haaretz Correspondents, and The Associated Press
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1023443.html

 
At least 19 people were wounded at around 11 P.M. Monday night when a Palestinian resident of East Jerusalem drove his car into a crowd of Israel Defense Forces soldiers at a busy intersection in the capital.

Two of the wounded were in serious condition, four were moderately hurt and the rest were lightly wounded, the Magen David Adom rescue service said.

Most of the wounded were IDF troops on their way to the Western Wall to mark the upcoming Jewish New Year when the attack at the Tzahal intersection, close to the Old City, took place.

Jerusalem Police Commander Ilan Franco said the driver of the black BMW was shot and killed by an IDF officer who was among the crowd targeted in the attack. Franco said the driver was apparently acting alone.

"A man in a vehicle struck a number of people in Tzahal Square," police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said. "We can confirm it was a terror attack. The man was shot and killed."

Israeli TV reported that the car was registered to a resident of Jabel Mukaber, an Arab village in East Jerusalem. The vehicle had a yellow Israeli license plate, the Associated Press news agency reported.

A previously unknown group claimed responsibility for the attack, Channel 2 television said.

An Israel Radio reporter on the scene described a large group of mostly ultra-Orthodox Jews chasing an Arab into the Old City after the attack.

The emergency call came into Magen David Adom at 10:55 P.M., but it described the incident as traffic accident. Only when the ambulance arrived did it become clear that it was a terrorist attack.

"I saw the car coming quickly and hit a group of soldiers and students standing there," an eyewitness said. "It happened very fast. It was impossible to know beforehand that this is what he intended to do."

Rescue personnel evacuated all of the victims to hospitals in the city. Local TV showed footage of a wounded soldier on a stretcher, holding his head, as he was wheeled into an ambulance.

Dr. Yuval Weiss, the director of Hadassah University Hospital, Ein Karem, said that 10 victims had been treated at the hospital, all of them fully conscious.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak released a statement in the wake of the attack demanding a speedup of procedures to allow the destruction of homes of Palestinian terrorists to act as a deterrence. Several years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that destroying houses does not deter terrorists, and the practice was halted.

Jerusalem police said that though there was no prior intelligence indicating a possible terror attack, the level of alert had been raised in recent days due to the Muslim holy month of Ramadan and the upcoming Jewish holidays.

This is the third time a vehicle has been used in a terror attack in Jerusalem in as many months. In July, two East Jerusalem residents carried out separate attacks with vehicles used in ongoing construction work in the city, killing three people and wounding many others.
 
 

Hamas probeert PA regering te destabilizeren

 
In plaats van weer een batterij klachten over Israel te ventileren, kunnen Israel en de PA beter samen bekijken hoe Hamas op de Westoever aan te pakken, en mogelijke aanslagen te voorkomen.
 
The official added that Israel is obstructing the transfer of weapons to the PA and the deployment of Palestinian forces in key cities such as Hebron, where Hamas is particularly strong.
According to the official, the way to weaken Hamas is to speed up the peace talks and dismantle Israeli outposts and even settlements in the West Bank, as well as remove IDF roadblocks, grant entry permits to Palestinian workers and cease the IDF's operations in the West Bank.
 
In plaatsen waar de PA wel de ruimte heeft gekregen zijn nog niet veel illegale wapens geconfisceerd of terroristische cellen opgeruimd, maar de rust is wel toegenomen. Israel heeft meer dan 100 checkpoints en roadblocks verwijderd, en zolang dit niet tot meer aanslagen leidt zal zij daarmee doorgaan. De operaties van het leger zijn gericht op het voorkomen van aanslagen door onder andere Hamas. Afgelopen weekend is nog een aanslag verijdeld bij de nederzetting Yitzar.  
 
RP
---------

PA official: Hamas looking to destabilize Abbas' regime
Authority fears attack on officials, institutions ahead of expected political turmoil surrounding end of Abbas' term in January 2009; 'only way to weaken Hamas is to dismantle Jewish outposts, cease IDF operations in West Bank,' official says
 
Ali Waked - YNET
 
The Palestinian Authority fears another wave of infighting in the West Bank as well as a series of attacks initiated by Hamas against targets in Israel aimed at destabilizing President Mahmoud Abbas' regime and hindering the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.
 
Drastic Step
A Palestinian security official told Ynet on Sunday that while it is estimated that Hamas will not be able to seize control of the West Bank, the Islamist group may look to weaken the Authority ahead of the expected political turmoil surrounding the end of Abbas' term in January 2009.

According to the official, Hamas leaders in Gaza and Damascus have ordered a number of cells to prepare to launch attacks against leading PA figures and institutions. He said the Hamas figure in charge of the operation is Ahmed Jabri, who is believed to be deputy chief of the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas' armed wing. Senior Palestinian terror suspect Muhammad Deif heads the Brigades.

'Enough power to cause damage'
On Saturday Brigades spokesman Abu Obeida warned that the continued arrest of Hamas members by PA security forces and the Authority's increased cooperation with Israel "pushed the moment of punishment forward".

The Palestinian official told Ynet that Hamas does not have the capability to take over the West Bank should Israel withdraw from the region in the framework of a future peace agreement with the PA.

"In the West Bank Hamas does not have an army of tens of thousands of fighters like in Gaza, but they have enough power to cause damage," he said, "so what we are demanding is that the Authority be given the opportunity to arm itself and train in order to minimize the potential damage Hamas may try to inflict."

The official added that Israel is obstructing the transfer of weapons to the PA and the deployment of Palestinian forces in key cities such as Hebron, where Hamas is particularly strong.

According to the official, the way to weaken Hamas is to speed up the peace talks and dismantle Israeli outposts and even settlements in the West Bank, as well as remove IDF roadblocks, grant entry permits to Palestinian workers and cease the IDF's operations in the West Bank.
 
 

Minister van Ivoorkust door Waqf geweigerd op Tempelberg

 
Als Israëlische soldaten in plaats van functionarissen van de islamitische Waqf de minister uit Ivoorkust de toegang tot de Tempelberg hadden ontzegd, was dat natuurlijk weer een sluitend bewijs geweest van Israëlische arrogantie en onbeschoftheid.
 
Misschien gaat de Waqf al te lang met de egalitaire Israëli's om, die immers wars zijn van standsverschillen?
 
____________________________

Waqf insults Muslim official visiting Israel
Ivory Coast minister seeking to pray on Temple Mount asked to recite verses from Koran to prove he is indeed Muslim
 
Itamar Eichner - YNET
 
Diplomatic incident on Temple Mount: A Muslim minister from Ivory Coast, on an official visit to Israel as a guest of the Foreign Ministry, was required by the Supreme Muslim Council (Waqf) of Jerusalem to recite verses from the Koran before entering the al-Aqsa Mosque in order to prove that he is Muslim. The insulted minister left the Mount immediately.

Minister Moussa Dosso is in charge of professional training and technical education in the Ivory Coast government. His visit to Israel was part of the Jewish state's efforts to tighten its cooperation with African countries.

During the trip, which was deemed a success, Dosso visited welfare institutes and institutes for youth rehabilitation and professional and technical training in tours organized by the Foreign Ministry's Africa department.

The minister also toured the Old City of Jerusalem with an escort appointed by the Foreign Ministry, and asked to pray at the al-Aqsa Mosque.

As he arrived after the official closing hours, police officers stationed at the entrance to the site asked Waqf officials to approve his entry. The Supreme Muslim Council officials asked to see the minister's identification card, but he told them that he had left his passport at the hotel and was an official guest of the Foreign Ministry.

"My name is Moussa Dosso and I am Muslim. All I want is to pray on the Mount," he said.

But the Waqf officials were determined not to let him without an identification card. According to Dosso, they asked him to prove that he is indeed Muslim and demanded that he recite the opening verses of the Koran.

Members of the minister's convoy argued with the Waqf men, but Dosso himself decided to put an end to the embarrassing situation.

"I am a faithful Muslim. There is no reason for me to start reciting verses here. You have insulted me," he told the officials before leaving the place.

The Waqf was unavailable for comment.
 

maandag 22 september 2008

150 PA soldaten worden in Hebron gestationeerd volgens 'Jenin model'

 
Ondanks klachten van de Palestijnse Autoriteit dat Israel de PA tegenwerkt en geen ruimte geeft om zelf tegen Hamas op te treden, heeft Israel toegestemd om het experiment van Jenin uit te breiden naar Hebron, ondanks de grote spanningen tussen kolonisten en Palestijnen aldaar. Hoewel de resultaten in Jenin bemoedigend zijn, is enig Israelisch wantrouwen wel op zijn plaats, gezien de ervaring dat de PA verdachten van (geplande) aanslagen op Israelische doelen vaak weer snel vrij laat, men terroristische groepen niet serieus ontwapent en plegers van aanslagen als 'martelaren' blijft eren. Ook in Jenin zijn in maanden tijd bijvoorbeeld maar 800 geweren ingezameld en werden gearresteerde verdachten niet veroordeeld en snel weer vrijgelaten (zie citaat Haaretz hieronder).
 
Dat Israel desondanks toestemt in toepassing van dit model in Hebron en er plannen liggen dit ook naar Tul Karm uit te breiden, is dan ook zeker een teken van goede wil te noemen.
 
RP
------------------
 
"Since the beginning of the year, the PA has collected only about 800 weapons, about 80 of them rifles from Jenin. That's a drop in the bucket, relative to the amounts still hidden, which will undoubtedly be pulled out of the caches in case of a renewed conflagration with Israel...Then of course there is the question of the prisoners. The revolving-door policy of arrests and releases continues."
Jenin: From terror capital to model of peace, by Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz - Last update - 20:27 20/09/2008


IDF to mull 150 PA soldiers in Hebron
 
 
In an effort to bolster Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas as he nears the end of his presidential term, the IDF will meet this week with Palestinian security chiefs in the Hebron area to finalize plans for the deployment of 150 Palestinian Authority soldiers in the city.

Abbas is scheduled to finish his term as president on January 9, 2009 and in the absence of new elections - due to the Hamas takeover of the Gaza Strip - Abbas, according to the PA constitution, will be replaced by the speaker of the PA parliament, Abdel Aziz Dweik, a senior Hamas official currently in an Israeli prison.

Abbas, however, is not expected to step down from his post and is looking for ways to extend his term. The IDF and the PA are concerned that Abbas's refusal to hand over the reins could set off violent clashes in the West Bank between Fatah and Hamas.

As a result, OC Central Command Maj.-Gen. Gadi Shamni has agreed to allow a platoon of 150 Palestinian soldiers to deploy in Hebron, where they will be used by the PA to crack down on Hamas operatives and infrastructure in the city, known for its strong Hamas presence.

Defense Ministry officials had initially opposed the deployment in Hebron, out of fear that the presence of armed Palestinian soldiers would escalate tensions with the Jewish settlers in the city. Palestinian assurances that the soldiers will not patrol areas near the Jewish community paved the way for Shamni's approval.

Col. Udi Ben-Muha, commander of the Judean Brigade, which is responsible for security in Hebron, is expected to meet this week with local Palestinian security commanders to coordinate the planned deployment.

The request to deploy soldiers in Hebron was made by Palestinian Prime Minister Salaam Fayad and is based on the "Jenin model," under which Palestinian troops deployed in large numbers in the city earlier this year and the IDF scaled back its operations in the vicinity.

In addition, Israel eased travel restrictions in northern Samaria and has started allowing Israeli Arabs to visit Jenin in an effort to rehabilitate its weakened economy.

If the Jenin and Hebron programs continue to produce results, the Defense Ministry may expand the program to Tulkarm.

On Thursday, 500 PA soldiers crossed over the Allenby Bridge into Jordan for US-funded military training.

While officials in the IDF and the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) claimed that terrorists were still present in the city, the number of terror warnings in Jenin have dropped drastically in recent weeks and the officials admitted that the PA forces are doing a relatively effective job in cracking down on Hamas institutions.

Livni en Barak besluiten tot samenwerking

 
De overeenkomst tussen Livni en Barak is goed nieuws, maar het blijft me een raadsel hoe Livni met zoveel kleinere partijen een stabiele coalitie kan vormen. Aan de huidige 5 (?) partijen wil ze er nog 3 toevoegen, zodat wanneer Labor of Shas de coalitie verlaat, er nog steeds een meerderheid is in de Knesset die de coalitie ondersteunt. Zoiets is bij ons toch ondenkbaar. De kans op nieuwe verkiezingen ergens in 2009 lijkt dan ook aanzienlijk te zijn. Zolang het politieke landschap zo versnipperd blijft, is echter ook dan de vraag hoe een coalitie te creëren die moeilijke besluiten kan nemen en pijnlijke compromissen sluiten.
 
 
RP
------------
 
Livni, Barak agree to cooperate
 
Gil Hoffman, THE JERUSALEM POST
 
The hostility between new Kadima leader Tzipi Livni and Labor Chairman Ehud Barak subsided late Sunday night after the two met in a positive atmosphere and agreed to make a serious effort to form a new government.

President Shimon Peres is expected to formally entrust Livni with forming a government on Monday night following consultations with the heads of the Knesset's 13 factions. Peres began the consultations after Prime Minister Ehud Olmert tendered his resignation to him on Sunday evening.

Following the 30-minute meeting, Peres met with journalists and said this was a "difficult evening" for Olmert, and that he appreciated "the respectful way in which he is handing over his power."

Peres read from a prepared text and thanked Olmert "for his service to the people and the state over the course of many years of public activities."

By submitting his letter of resignation to the president, Olmert set the process of selecting a new prime minister in motion. Even as he was in Beit Hanassi with Peres, Kadima faction members - including Interior Minister Meir Sheetrit, Construction and Housing Minister Ze'ev Boim and Tzahi Hanegbi - were waiting in the foyer for their meeting with Peres to recommend that the president ask Livni to form a government.

In addition to meeting the Kadima faction, Peres also met with Labor, Likud and Shas representatives on Sunday night.

Olmert reportedly decided to expedite his resignation at Livni's request. He will remain prime minister of a caretaker government until Livni can form a new coalition within 42 days or until a new government is formed after a general election.

Livni's chances of forming a government improved significantly after she agreed with Barak that it was in the interest of both of them and the country that a coalition be formed as soon as possible. Tension between the two had risen over the weekend when Barak decided to meet with opposition leader Binyamin Netanyahu before meeting with her.

Barak's associates said he sought and received a commitment from Livni that she would form a stable government that would last for more than just a few months and that any decision on a date for a general election would be coordinated between Labor and Kadima.

Livni's promise eased Barak's fears that she would form a government and then immediately go to elections in order to go into the race as a sitting prime minister against former prime ministers Barak and Netanyahu. Barak's associates said he was looking forward to entering the government because he believes that Livni would be dependent on his security expertise, especially following the departure of Transportation Minister and former IDF chief of General Staff Shaul Mofaz.

Barak also called for changes in priorities ahead of the voting on the 2009 state budget, and Livni agreed.

She also denied reports that she would give Kadima's current coalition partners an ultimatum to form a government within 10 days or face elections.

While the 42 days that Livni has to form a government would give her until November 14, because Shabbat and holidays are not included in the figure, her real goal is to complete the task before the Knesset returns to session on October 27.

"In the face of all the difficult economic, political and security challenges, we must act quickly to establish a stable government," Livni told Kadima ministers Sunday morning. "I expect our coalition partners to act accordingly. I intend to decide quickly, even if it seems that time is working in our favor in the coalition negotiations. We must make a decision and take the country out of this position of uncertainty."

Livni hopes to form a government with the 64 MKs in the current coalition plus Meretz, Justice for the Pensioners and the United Torah Judaism faction, with whom she is set to meet on Monday afternoon. Adding the 14 MKs from those factions would give her insurance in case Labor or Shas decided to bolt the coalition.

Shas Chairman Eli Yishai told reporters on Sunday that he was not afraid of elections but that he would not push for them either. Likud leaders Binyamin Netanyahu, Silvan Shalom and Gideon Sa'ar met with Shas mentor Shas mentor Rabbi Ovadia Yosef and told him that only immediate elections could save Jerusalem from being divided.

In a meeting with Peres, Yishai decided not to recommend that Livni form a government, because he had not received commitments from her on diplomatic and socioeconomic issues, but he also said Shas opposed elections.

Kadima representatives recommended Livni, Likud MKs pushed Peres for elections and Labor's team told the president they recommended Barak even though he was prohibited from forming a government because he was not an MK.
They said the law could be changed to accommodate him.

Peres is set to meet with representatives of the other nine Knesset factions on Monday before appointing Livni to form a government and then leaving to head Israel's delegation to the UN General Assembly in New York.

 
Herb Keinon contributed to this report.

zondag 21 september 2008

Het waarmerk van antisemitisme

 
Ik heb me er lang tegen verzet om antizionisme en andere felle anti-Israël kritiek als antisemitisch te bestempelen, maar dat lukt me niet meer. Een Duitse bisschop vergeleek in maart Ramallah met het Joodse getto van Warschau.
 
Ik heb in maart toevallig ook Ramallah bezocht, en geen getto aangetroffen. Het was een vrij gemiddelde Arabische stad, waar het leven nogal gewoon zijn gangetje ging. De Israëlische checkpoints op de Westoever zorgen voor nogal wat oponthoud bij het reizen en belemmeren zeker de economische ontwikkeling van de Palestijnen, maar een getto? We hebben er over de drukke markt gelopen, kleurige Arabische kleding in winkeltjes bekeken, met een Palestijnse vrouw koffie gedronken in de lokale Starbucks, ons verbaasd over het vele afval dat op braakliggende stukken grond werd gedumpt (zoals je ook in Israël wel zag), zelfs het graf van Arafat bezocht, en we werden door Palestijnse soldaten gesommeerd om geen foto's te maken in de buurt van de regeringsgebouwen van de PA. We zagen ook de graffiti tegen de Israëlische bezetting en plakkaten en monumenten waarmee terroristen werden geëerd en verheerlijkt.
 
Wie Ramallah durft te vergelijken met het getto van Warschau moet wel kwaadwillende motieven hebben, maar helaas is dit geen uitzondering. Onlangs noemde de schoonzus van Tony Blair de Gazastrook een concentratiekamp, anderen spreken al jaren van een 'grote openluchtgevangenis'. Een heel leger mensen met 'legitieme kritiek op Israël' heeft het - met soms het schuim zichtbaar op de lippen - over 'Israëlische Apartheid' en 'Nazi-praktijken'. De term antisemitisme stamt uit 1879, de anti-Joodse sentimenten zijn al milennia oud.
 
 
Wouter
________________

Last update - 11:36 19/09/2008
The hallmark of anti-Semitism
 
By Benjamin Weinthal
 
 
BERLIN - Antony Lerman protested the formulation "anti-Zionism equals anti-Semitism" on this page, arguing that because many anti-Zionists are Jewish, such an approach only "widens the pool of our enemies" and causes us to "lose our way." But the failure to recognize the effect that Jewish anti-Zionism has on discourse among non-Jews creates a massive blind spot in the fight against Judeophobia.

Lerman complains that equating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism diverts attention from more "traditional" manifestations of Jew-hatred, and also interferes with legitimate discussion of Israel's policies. What he fails to understand is that in the post-Holocaust age of political correctness, anti-Zionism is the favored, even socially acceptable, channel by which anti-Semitism expresses itself.

The intense, disproportionate attacks masked under the phrase "Israel criticism," or the very questioning of the Jewish state's right to exist, cannot simply be excused as legitimate critique. The practical implications of much of the anti-Zionist rhetoric, after all, would mean the dissolution of Israel. Hence, it is the anti-Zionist Jews themselves who are widening the pool of enemies.
 
Contemporary Germany provides a good example of this. The major media here have largely outsourced their Israel discussion to anti-Israeli Jews. One of the latter, a self-styled journalist named Evelyn Hecht-Galinski, has equated Israel's policies with those of Nazi Germany, and argued that a "Jewish-Israel lobby with an active network extends around the world, and thanks to America, its power has become great." In response, German-Jewish journalist Henryk M. Broder wrote that "anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist statements are her specialty." While Hecht-Galinski did not object to the anti-Zionist label, she was granted a temporary restraining order to prevent Broder from invoking the adjective "anti-Semitic."

In raging against the Jewish state, critics like Hecht-Galinski serve to symbolically inoculate non-Jewish Germans against the charge of anti-Semitism and bias against Israel. The rejoinder, "but Jews themselves say this," has become a standard defense, a type of kashrut seal that justifies comparing Israel with Nazi Germany, or blaming Jews for rising global anti-Semitism.

Even better than a Diaspora Jew criticizing Israel is an Israeli who does so, via criticism that can easily be misunderstood and even distorted. The culture editor of the conservative daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Patrick Bahners, for example, in a recent exoneration of Hecht-Galinski of anti-Israel prejudices, noted that even some Israeli peace activists compared the security fence to the walls of the Warsaw Ghetto. Bahners, like a majority of Germans (according to a 2004 study), feels comfortable with the "Israelis are to Palestinians as Nazis are to Jews" analogy. And, most of the country's other major dailies have also aligned themselves with Hecht-Galinski.

German experts on anti-Semitism view the "Israelis as Nazis" reflex as a form of "secondary anti-Semitism." Already two decades ago, Israeli psychoanalyst Zvi Rex identified a core element of post-Shoah "secondary anti-Semitism" with his ironic observation that, "The Germans will never forgive the Jews for Auschwitz." In this view, Israel, by serving as a permanent reminder of the Holocaust, evokes guilt and resentment. Some relief is provided by giving a platform to a small and unrepresentative group of anti-Israel Jews.

But secondary anti-Semitism is not limited to Germany, and it's astonishing that Lerman neglected to note the connection between it and the disproportionately high levels of anti-Israel sentiment in Europe today.

Considering the obvious link between secondary anti-Semitism and anti-Israel sentiments, it seems especially counterproductive to summarily dismiss - as Lerman did - the European Union's "working definition" of anti-Semitism, which describes such manifestations of the phenomenon as "applying double standards [to Israel] by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation" and "drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis."

Publicizing the "working definition" would advance the understanding of contemporary anti-Semitism. And after giving governments a set of criteria, grounded in the most current research on anti-Semitism, if the "working definition" were to be legally adopted by police and local authorities, human rights violations could be monitored. The nebulous subject of what "really" constitutes anti-Semitism could be discussed in more detached, objective terms.

Most Germans remain mired in an obsolete conception of anti-Semitism that encompasses the Nazis' view of Jews as money-grubbing or as scheming and sub-human. Sensitivity to, and awareness of, more contemporary manifestations of anti-Semitism are sorely lacking.

One example is the case of Prof. Arnd Kruger, a sports historian at the University of Gottingen, who has argued that the 11 Israelis who were killed at the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich essentially committed suicide "for the cause of Israel." According to Kruger, the athletes allowed themselves to be murdered by the Black September Palestinian terrorists, so as to prolong financial restitution from Germany, and to preserve Holocaust guilt among Germans. Kruger based his martyr theory on "a different perception of the human body" in Israel, supposedly reflected in a high rate of abortion there, adding that "Israel tries to prevent living with disabilities at all costs."

Kruger's statements meet the standard of anti-Semitism as defined by the EU "working definition," yet two weeks ago a University of Gottingen commission rejected charges of academic misconduct against Kruger and absolved him of anti-Semitism. Other than that, there's been almost no public outcry at his outrageous suggestions.

Unfortunately, there is no shortage of Kruger-style cases in Germany, and the juncture of anti-Israeli, anti-Semitic views is the hallmark of contemporary anti-Semitism. And whether it is non-Jews or a fringe group of anti-Zionist Jews who meet the criteria of the EU "working definition" of anti-Semitism, we should energetically raise our voices to counter the nonsense parading as criticism of Israel.

 
Benjamin Weinthal is an independent journalist working in Berlin.
 

Syrië geeft Russische spionagetips over Israel door aan Hezbollah


Israel heeft zo haar eigen problemen met Rusland.....

---------------

Syria feeds Russian spy tips to Hezbollah - Israel
 
www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LJ227596.htm
19 Sep 2008 13:28:21 GMT
Source: Reuters

 
JERUSALEM, Sept 19 (Reuters) - Israel believes Russia passes intelligence it gathers about the Jewish state to Syria and indirectly to Hezbollah guerrillas in neighbouring Lebanon, a senior military officer said on Friday.

The allegations were made by Colonel Ram Dor, chief of information security in the armed forces, to Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth.

They came at a touchy time in relations with Moscow, given Russian arms talks with Syria and the involvement of a Russian state-owned company in building a nuclear power plant for Iran at Bushehr on its Gulf coast.

Russia has, in turn, complained about Israeli arms and training for Georgia, with which it fought a five-day war last month over the Georgian province of South Ossetia. "My assessment is that their facilities cover most of the state of Israel's territory," Dor told Yedioth Ahronoth, describing Russian spy ships that dock in Syria and Russian personnel who he said serve in electronic eavesdropping stations on the Syrian side of the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

"The Syrians share the intelligence that they gather with Hezbollah, and the other way around. This we know, because we know how to build a mirror-image that shows us what enemy intelligence knows about us," Dor said.

"So if the Russians help the Syrians get information, and the Syrians constantly pass it on to Hezbollah, it is a reasonable supposition that the information gathered by the Russians also reaches Hezbollah's hands."

Russian officials in Moscow were unavailable for comment.

Moscow has denied providing Syria or Iran with support that could boost their offensive capabilities and in recent years has offered to host Israeli-Arab peace summits.

Israel generally avoids public censure of Russia. Analysts say it is concerned such criticism could hurt efforts to lobby Moscow into scrapping arms sales to Syria or weaken its backing for U.N. sanctions designed to deny Iran the means to make an atomic bomb. Israel suffered surprise setbacks in a 2006 war with Hezbollah which some Israeli military commanders blamed on the guerrilla group's access to Russian intelligence and weapons.

Hezbollah does not volunteer information on its military assets, and Iran and Syria deny providing the group with arms.

According to Yedioth, Israel believes the Russian are spying on it "so significant changes in the region do not catch them by surprise. They are preoccupied with Middle East stability".

(Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Mark Trevelyan)


--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

zaterdag 20 september 2008

Paul McCartney treedt 25 september op in Tel Aviv

 
Wanneer een popster in een Arabisch land wil optreden is dat prima voorzover de autoriteiten dat toestaan, maar Israel is uiteraard een ander verhaal. Allerlei anti-Israel groeperingen oefenen druk uit op McCartney om niet in Israel op te treden, en hij wordt zelfs met de dood bedreigd. Gelukkig raadpleegt hij andere bronnen, en is hij niet van plan aan deze druk en bedreigingen toe te geven.
 
RP
-------------
 
Come Together

WALL STREET JOURNAL EUROPE

 
Paul McCartney reassured his fans in the Jewish state last week that he'll go ahead with a planned concert in Tel Aviv. "I do what I think and I have many friends who support Israel," Mr. McCartney told the Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth.

If we lived in normal times, a pop star's tour schedule would not be considered news outside the entertainment media. But then again, the growing campaign to delegitimize Israel and the pressure on the ex-Beatle to cancel his concert can hardly be called normal. Mr. McCartney deserves applause for his steadfastness. "I was approached by different groups and political bodies who asked me not to come here," he told the Israeli paper. "I refused."


Sir Paul even received death threats. "Paul McCartney is the enemy of every Muslim," hate preacher Omar Bakri said in his weekly Internet broadcast from Lebanon, according to the Sunday Express. "If he values his life, Mr. McCartney will not come to Israel," Mr. Bakri added, warning that "sacrifice operatives will be waiting for him."

The ex-Beatle's concert has drawn particular ire from anti-Zionists as it comes amid the Jewish state's 60th anniversary celebrations. In Western Europe, and particularly in Mr. McCartney's home country, the view that there is little to celebrate about Israel's rebirth has moved from the fringes of society to the mainstream of left-wing media and academia. In May, the union of British university lecturers renewed its push for an academic boycott of Israel.

Luckily, Mr. McCartney doesn't seem to be getting his information from the Guardian or the BBC. "I've heard so many great things about Tel Aviv and Israel, but hearing is one thing and experiencing it for yourself is another," he said in comments posted on his Web site last month.

A standard smear against Israel is that it is supposedly an apartheid state. In truth, Mr. McCartney will be performing in the only country in the Middle East where Jews, Christians and Muslims, as well as both men and women, can come together in freedom and listen to his songs.
 
 

Jenin als model voor vrede?

 
"Model of peace" is wat sterk uitgedrukt, maar er is wel een verandering ten goede gaande. Of die bestand is tegen de realiteiten van het Midden-Oosten, zoals zelfmoordaanslagen, corruptie, wederzijds wantrouwen etc. moet nog blijken, maar het lijkt erop dat deze aanpak 'van onderop' werkt.
 
Overigens eist Hamas dat Fatah de samenwerking met 'het Zionistische regime' stopzet. Zij gedijt nou eenmaal beter in chaos en ellende. Dat de gevolgen van deze nieuwe aanpak en de verwijdering van meer dan 100 checkpoints door Israel niet meteen zichtbaar zijn in een groei van de economie op de Westoever, is niet vreemd. Het duurt immers even voordat nieuwe bedrijfjes en winkels zijn opgezet.
 
RP
--------


Jenin: From terror capital to model of peace
 
By Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff
Last update - 20:27 20/09/2008
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1022546.html

 
JENIN - All military camps are similar, and in the Middle East they also occasionally change hands, without their external appearance undergoing any significant changes. As such, Israel handed Jenin's Muqata compound over to the Palestinian security forces in 1996. Although part of it was bombed in 2001, today the compound once again serves as an active Palestinian Authority headquarters. Even the mirror next to the exit gate, a familiar sight from every Israel Defense Forces base, has remained in place. Only the slogan, "Soldier, Improve Your Appearance," has been removed by the Palestinians. All the rest is still there.

In the base's main square - once visible from the offices of the Israeli brigade commander in charge, occupied by officers the likes of Amos Malka and Yoav Galant - a sluggish Palestinian roll call was held on Monday morning. A mustachioed sergeant bombarded his policemen with orders as they marched together in three columns, still rubbing the sleep from their eyes. The whole thing was reminiscent of an IDF roll call: a mixture of uniforms and berets, uncoordinated marching and a blatant lack of enthusiasm. One policeman even answered his cell phone during the exercises.

Jenin is now the great hope of everyone who is trying to breathe new life into the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. In Washington, the Bush administration is nearing the end of its term; in Gaza, Hamas is consolidating its power (and in the process this week massacred several members of the extremist Durmush clan); in Jerusalem and Ramallah, officials are gradually beginning to understand that the hope of formulating a "shelf agreement" by the end of 2008 has itself been shelved - effectively making Jenin the only source of positive news in the neighborhood. The project in question began in May: Jenin has become the testing ground for the PA to restore its complete control, something it hasn't had since 2001.

The plan enjoys the substantial support of the Middle East Quartet - the United States, Russia, the European Union and the United Nations - and is being implemented under the close supervision of the Americans. Israel, for its part, has significantly reduced its military activity in Jenin and its environs, eased the traffic restrictions to and from the city and is assisting in the effort to revitalize the northern West Bank's economy, by allowing Israeli Arabs to visit Jenin, among other things.

Change from the bottom up

Four and a half months after the Jenin project began, it is proving a big success. The Shin Bet security service has received very few intelligence warnings about attempts at terror attacks emanating from the region, and clashes with the IDF have almost subsided. Commerce and industry have improved slightly, and - what is most important, from the Palestinian perspective - order has returned to the streets.

In Israel, too, the realization is slowly dawning that something positive is happening here. Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Shin Bet chief Yuval Diskin and IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi recently praised the changes taking place in Jenin. The city that once saw itself as the spearhead of the intifada, from which dozens of deadly suicide terrorists emerged, who carried out murderous attacks in Israel, is now a source of relatively good news.

There is no mistaking the fact that this is a different Jenin. Visiting the city this week, it was markedly apparent that there were no armed gangs prowling the streets. Instead, one could sense the overwhelming presence of the Palestinian security forces. Three vehicles of the various security services were deployed at a central junction on the southern approach to the city, containing a total of 12 policemen. Their commander, Sgt. Ibrahim Habas of the Palestinian National Security force, explains that his men's main job is to maintain order. "We operate both against car thieves and against what you refer to as terror organizations. If we see someone walking around with a Kalashnikov without a permit, we will arrest him and confiscate the weapon."

His men look alert and disciplined, but their equipment and uniforms are still a motley mix. The instructions regarding the bearing of arms are also flexible (the safety catches of some rifles are released whereas others are closed). Even in the Jenin refugee camp, sight of the bloody battle during Operation Defense Shield in April 2002, there is no trace of armed wanted men. Zacharia Zubeidi is retired and his successors are nowhere to be found. It is impossible to compare the way the camp looks today with how it looked from an Israeli armed personnel carrier the day after the 2002 battle. At what was then "ground zero," where Israeli bulldozers demolished dozens of houses, new houses have been built, gleaming white in comparison with the battered facade of the older houses.

The changes can largely be accredited to Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, who is proving to be the most impressive politician we have seen on the Palestinian side for years (and who is more successful at delivering results than even many of his Israeli counterparts). But there is another important patron of Jenin's success: the U.S. administration, and mainly its two senior security envoys to the region, Gen. James Jones and Gen. Keith Dayton. Israel, which initially treated the American ideas with suspicion and even disdain, is gradually being forced to admit that it is the Americans who have helped bring about the impressive change.

This initial skepticism stemmed, among other things, from Dayton's failure in Gaza, where he relied on the PA forces until the last moment, a few days before they were battered by Hamas in June 2007. But the West Bank, at least for now, is not Gaza, and this time the process is far more organized and calculated.

It turns out that U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice holds Jones in high regard. His staff includes a regular presence representing all of the administration's strong elements, from the vice president to the National Security Council, the Pentagon and the CIA. He also regularly updates the headquarters on the two presidential candidates, John McCain and Barack Obama. As the Annapolis process seems to have reached a dead end, the Americans have switched to the idea of fomenting change from the grass roots up. In order to augment the achievement, which will be credited to Bush once his term ends, the U.S. is now looking for a way to apply the program to additional West Bank locales. Fayyad suggested Hebron, but Israel and the U.S. have reservations, fearing that friction with the settlers could cause the project to flop. Another possibility, which is being examined more seriously, is Tul Karm.

The commander of Beaufort

The close relations with the Americans have brought about a change in the status of the Palestinian National Security forces: They are more professional, less corrupt and accorded respect by other groups. This week, members of the force's fourth division embarked on a U.S.-led training exercise in Jordan.

Suleiman Umran is the force's Jenin brigade commander. During a conversation in his office in Jenin's Muqata, he says the friction with the armed men was less serious than one would have thought. A first test came when armed men shot and killed a Force 17 (presidential guard) officer. Umran used the crisis to stage a show of force, removing the wanted men from the municipal hospital, which they had forcibly turned into their headquarters by removing the medical staff from one of its wings. "Any resident you ask will tell you: We have restored security to the city," he boasts.

Umran, a veteran member of the Palestine Liberation Organization, was born in the village of Dir Hateb, near Nablus, but spent many years in exile, following then-PLO chairman Yasser Arafat. In 1981 he served as the commander of the Beaufort outpost in South Lebanon, but he was transferred after a few months, before the fortress was captured by the Golani Brigade in the first Lebanon war. He has heard of the film "Beaufort," but he hasn't seen it yet. "I'm working hard here," he explains.

Talking about Israel, Umran has many complaints: IDF forces deliberately enter Tubas to demonstrate a presence there; the IDF still carries out many overnight arrests in Jenin; the Israeli army is slow in responding to requests for assistance in improving the mobility of the Palestinian forces, and also delays issuing permits for equipment for scattering demonstrations. The entry of cars into the city via the Jalameh crossing is being delayed, "because you still haven't installed electric gates. How long is that supposed to take? Is that the way you want to attack Iran, too?"

While some of these claims are certainly valid, it seems the Palestinians have also become accustomed to blaming Israel for everything that happens in the territories. The IDF has made several counter-claims, including that the collection of weapons is being carried out at a snail's pace: Since the beginning of the year, the PA has collected only about 800 weapons, about 80 of them rifles from Jenin. That's a drop in the bucket, relative to the amounts still hidden, which will undoubtedly be pulled out of the caches in case of a renewed conflagration with Israel or (a more likely scenario at the moment) between Fatah and Hamas.

Then of course there is the question of the prisoners. The revolving-door policy of arrests and releases continues. The Palestinians say they are forced to use these means because of a lack of detention facilities (Israel did, in fact, destroy a substantial percentage of the prisons in the territories in recent years, as part of its raids on PA facilities). An Israeli brigade commander in one sector of the West Bank explains that the level of mutual suspicion remains high. "We understand that times have changed, and we can see the improvement. But after Palestinian policemen have fired at you more than once or twice, it's hard to regain confidence in them," he says.

The main Achilles' heel remains the economy: Most West Bank citizens have yet to feel a genuine change. Although the IDF talks of an improvement, a World Bank report published this week indicates that the rate of annual growth, 0.8 percent, is very low, especially compared to the rate of population growth. Nor does the number of checkpoints removed by the IDF change the overall picture of an economy that relies mainly on the public sector and has a hard time developing an effective commercial life.

Haniyeh houdt optimistische rede bij Iftar maaltijd in Gaza concentratiekamp


Verzoenende woorden van een gematigd leider tijdens de ramadan.

-------

Haniyeh: Olmert will go to hell; the palestinian question will remain alive
 
www. maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=32054
Date: 20 / 09 / 2008  Time:  09:54  
 

Gaza – Ma'an – "Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert will go to hell, and the government in Gaza, Hamas, the resistance and the Palestinian question will remain alive," said de facto Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh on Friday.

Haniyeh described "the Zionist project" as being in a stage of collapse and abatement. "The Zionist entity has no future on the Palestinian land," he said "and the Palestinian people will continue on the path of establishing an independent Palestinian state with complete sovereignty and with Jerusalem as its capital. Palestinian refugees who were displaced in 1948 will also return to their homeland."

Haniyeh's comments came during a Ramadan evening meal in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip. He called on all Palestinian sectors to close ranks in the interest of the struggle against Israel. He then visited the homes of secretary general of the Popular Resistance Committees, Abu Ataya Abu Samhadanah who was killed by Israeli forces, and freed prisoner Abdul-Basit Al-Mahmoum to congratulate him and the family.

After the dinner, Haniyeh visited the mayor of Rafah Issa An-Nashar in his home, and performed the evening prayer and the Ramadan long evening prayer as an Imam at Al-Abrar mosque in Rafah.


*** Balanced Middle East News ***
MidEastweb http://www.mideastweb.org
Subscribe - mail to mewnews-subscribe@yahoogroups.com