woensdag 16 september 2009

Toegangsweg met treden naar de Tweede Tempel in Jeruzalem opgegraven

       The stepped street. Photographic credit: Vladimir Neichin
 

In de media staat vaak dat dergelijke archeologische vondsten en ook het zoeken ernaar 'politiek' zijn, met andere woorden 'verdacht', alsof het proberen te achterhalen van de geschiedenis van Jeruzalem eigenlijk niet legitiem is. Feit is, zoals Ami hieronder terecht opmerkt, dat deze vondsten stuk voor stuk het Israelische verhaal bevestigen. Over vondsten uit de tijd van de Ottomanen of Arabische overheersers voor die tijd zijn er nooit discussies want niemand ontkent de geschiedenis uit die tijd. De Palestijnen ontkennen echter consequent de Joodse geschiedenis van Jeruzalem, en de Joodse binding met de stad en Israel überhaupt. Alle archeologische bewijzen worden domweg genegeerd.
 
RP
-------------

Israel: Second Temple Street in Jerusalem City of David Excavation

Israel antiquities authority reports finding of a stepped street in excavations in the "Silwan" (Shiloach - in English - Siloam) area. Each such find supports the Israeli "narrative" (fact) of Jewish habitation and sovereignty in Jerusalem in ancient times, and debunks the Palestinian "alternative narrative" that there were no Jews in "Palestine" in ancient times. That explains why the Palestinians are so anxious about these archeological digs and the removal of Palestinian Arab squatters who settled illegally in the Shiloach/ City of David area after 1967. The Jewish inhabitants of this area were ethnically cleansed during the illegal Jordanian occupation of Jerusalem that began in 1948. - Ami Isseroff
 
=====================================
 
Second Temple Period Stepped Street Discovered in City of David Excavation

2000 Years Ago, Pilgrims Began Their Trek to the Temple Mount From Here

A section of a stepped street paved in stone slabs, going south in the direction of the Shiloach Pool was discovered in excavations conducted by the Israel Antiquities Authority in the Shiloach Pool Excavation at the City of David in the Jerusalem Walls National Park. The excavations are conducted in cooperation with the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, funded by the Elad Foundation, under the auspices of Prof. Ronny Reich of Haifa University and Eli Shukron of the Israel Antiquities Authority.

The existence of this road has been known about for over one hundred years, since it was first discovered between 1894 and 1897 by Prof. Frederick J. Bliss and Archibald C. Dickey of the British Palestine Exploration Fund, and then covered and filled in at the end of their excavation. Other sections of this same road, to the north, have been excavated and covered over in the past, including during the excavations of Jones in 1937 and Kathleen Kenyon from 1961-1967.

This section of the stepped street was discovered at a distance of 550 meters south of the Temple Mount. The road represents the central thoroughfare of Jerusalem that ascended from the north-west corner of the Second Temple Shiloach Pool to the north.

According to Prof. Ronny Reich, "In the Second Temple Period, pilgrims would begin the ascent to the Temple from here. This is the southernmost tip of the road, of which a section has already been discovered along the western face of the Temple Mount."

The current excavation has been concentrated in a very narrow strip (1-2 meters in width) in the western sections of the road. Essentially, the excavation work removed the earth that had been filled in by previous excavators over the sections they already discovered. This section of road is built in the Second Temple style, which comprises alternating wide and narrow steps.

Further work must be done to clarify what the relationship was between the current excavated section and the section of the road and the drainage channel that were discovered nearby two years ago. 
 
 
For more information: Yoli Shwartz, Spokesperson, Israel Antiquities Authority 052-599-1888
 

Kritiek Israel op VN commissie Goldstone naar oorlogsmisdaden in Gaza Oorlog


Vragen en antwoorden over Israels positie wat betreft het VN onderzoek naar de Gaza Oorlog.
 
---------------------

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL/GOLDSTONE FACT-FINDING MISSION
(Communicated by the Foreign Ministry Spokesperson)
15 September 2009


Why hasn't Israel cooperated with international investigations into the Gaza Operation?

There have been tens of International inquiries into events in the Gaza Operation, and Israel has cooperated fully with almost all of them. Only in those instances where it seemed clear beyond any doubt that the initiative was motivated by a political agenda and not concern for human rights, did Israel decide not to cooperate. Unfortunately the Human Rights Council Fact Finding Mission (the "Goldstone Mission") was one of these.

Why does Israel claim that the Goldstone Mission was politically motivated?

Three reasons:

The Resolution establishing the Mission prejudges the outcome of any inquiry. Prior to any investigation, it determines that Israel has "caused massive violations of human rights" and accuses Israel of targeting medical facilities and systematically destroying Palestinian cultural heritage. It does not accuse the Hamas of any violations. The one-sided nature of the resolution was the reason it was not supported by many States, including Canada, Japan, Switzerland the European Union.

The Mandate of the Mission is similarly one-sided. It calls for an investigation into violations of international law by "the occupying Power, Israel, against the Palestinian people."  It does not mandate any investigation of violations by Palestinian terrorist organizations. It was for this reason that many distinguished individuals who were asked to head the Mission refused.  One of them was Mary Robinson, former High Commissioner for Human Rights, who described the mandate as: "not balanced because it focuses on what Israel did, without calling for an investigation on the launch of the rockets by Hamas."

Members of the Mission: At least one of the Mission's members has a clear bias on the issues under investigation. During the very conflict which she is now supposed to be impartially investigating, Professor Christine Chinkin was signatory to a letter to the London Sunday Times, asserting that Israel's actions "amount to aggression, not self-defense" and that "the manner and scale of its operations in Gaza amount to an act of aggression and is contrary to international law".

Wasn't the mandate of the Mission changed to be more balanced?

Goldstone has claimed that the Mandate of the Mission was changed, unilaterally, by the then-President of the Council. However, as a matter of law, the only body with the legal authority to modify the Mandate is the Council itself, and it has never done so.

Additionally,  it should be noted that even the so-called changed mandate focused on events in Gaza, between the dates December 27, 2008 and January 1, 2009, effectively ruling out any attention to the years in which thousands of missiles were fired on civilians  Israel prior to the start of the military operation.

Finally, even if were the Mission to operate according to new and different terms of reference of its own devising, all subsequent proceedings by the Council following its report would still be based on the Council's own biased Resolution and Mandate.

Wasn't the Mission balanced in practice? Didn't it invite all sides to present evidence at public hearings?

Israel was concerned by reports in the Palestinian media that at every stage of their visit to Gaza the Mission members were accompanied by Hamas representatives. If so, this was clearly a major obstacle to obtaining genuine evidence, particularly regarding Hamas' violations of international law, and its use of civilians as human shields.

The unprecedented decision of a fact-finding mission to hold public hearings was also troubling. The very point of a fact-finding mission is that a team of experts bring their experience and judgment to bear in assessing the available evidence and drawing responsible conclusions - not that emotional allegations are directly broadcast into the public arena, without any possibility of taking confidential or sensitive information into consideration.

Can't Israel rely on the neutrality of the UN Human Rights Council?

Unfortunately not. The Human Rights Council has consistently singled out Israel, while failing to address the true violators of human rights. It has devoted more resolutions to condemning Israel, than to all the other countries of the world combined. Needless to say no resolution or fact-finding mission was initiated by the Council concerning the firing of 12,000 rockets and missiles on Israeli civilians during the years prior to the Gaza operation.

Justice Goldstone himself admitted, in an interview to Al Jazeera "I can understand Israel's suspicion with regard to the Human Rights Council - it has been partial with regard to Israel for many years."

But if Israel doesn't cooperate, won't wrongdoers go unpunished?

Israel is committed to ensuring that its forces act in accordance with international law, and the rules of armed conflict form part of the training of every soldier. In case of any allegations that these principles have not been upheld, Israel is committed to fully investigating and prosecuting offenders. Additionally, any decision not to investigate or prosecute an alleged offence can be appealed to Israel's Supreme Court.

Following the conclusion of the military operation in Gaza, Israel initiated a series of far reaching command investigations into various aspects of the conflict, as well as many dozens of specific investigations into particular allegations of improper conduct by soldiers. In the past, such investigations have led to criminal prosecutions and convictions, and in this case a number of criminal prosecutions regarding wrongdoings are already in process.

--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

Hamas 'politieagenten' die omkwamen in Gaza Oorlog waren getrainde terroristen


Natuurlijk komt dit niet in de NRC of op het NOS journaal, waar de mythe wordt gehandhaafd dat de 'politiemannen' van Hamas het verkeer regelen.
 
The official list of the slain Palestinian policemen was published for the first time on the police website on February 24, 2009.1 The term "Palestinian police" was incorporated in the interim accords between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (1995) pursuant to the Israeli demand that sought to avoid awarding the Palestinians the trappings of an independent state. Lumped under the rubric of the "Palestinian police" were all the security bodies that fulfilled combat and terror roles against Israel, the intelligence and preventive intelligence bodies, as well as those active in policing and maintaining order.
 
RP
-------------
 

Palestinian "Policemen" Killed in Operation Cast Lead Were Trained Terrorists

It is not a big surprise to find that the Palestinian police being trained by Hamas were moonlighting as terrorists militants, is it?

===========

Palestinian "Policemen" Killed in Gaza Operation Were Trained Terrorists

Jonathan D. Halevi

 

  • After international human rights organizations accused Israel of killing innocent Palestinian "traffic policemen" during the Gaza operation, a detailed investigation shows that a decisive majority of the Palestinian "policemen" were members of the military wings of the Palestinian terror organizations and fighters who had undergone military training.
  • Among the 343 members of the Palestinian security forces who were killed, 286 have been identified as terror organization members (83 percent). Another 27 fighters belonging to units undergoing infantry training raises this total to 313 (91 percent).
  • Lumped under the rubric of the "Palestinian police" are all the security bodies that fulfilled combat and terror roles against Israel, the intelligence and preventive intelligence bodies, as well as those active in policing and maintaining order. Those serving in all of the Palestinian security apparatuses in 2007 and 2008 took part in terror activity and fighting against the IDF.
  • In the December 27, 2008, attack on an officer training course at Gaza police headquarters, 89 dead were counted. Of these, 60 (67 percent) belonged to Hamas and almost all were members of its military wing, the al-Qassam Brigades. The total number of terror activists and fighters among those killed at police headquarters was 81 (91 percent).
  • The human rights organizations which reported on Palestinian casualties in Gaza failed to mention the affiliation of hundreds of Palestinian security personnel who were members of terrorist organizations and who were trained fighters, thus artificially inflating the list of "civilians" killed by the IDF.

After international human rights organizations accused Israel of killing innocent Palestinian "traffic policemen" during the Gaza operation (Dec. 27, 2008-Jan. 18, 2009) who were not involved in fighting or in terror, a detailed investigation shows that a decisive majority of the Palestinian "policemen" were members of the military wings of the Palestinian terror organizations and fighters who had undergone military training.

Among the 343 members of the Palestinian security forces who were killed, 286 have been identified as terror organization members (83 percent). Another 27 fighters belonging to units undergoing infantry training raises this total to 313 (91 percent).

Who Were the Palestinian "Policemen"?

The official list of the slain Palestinian policemen was published for the first time on the police website on February 24, 2009.1 The term "Palestinian police" was incorporated in the interim accords between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (1995) pursuant to the Israeli demand that sought to avoid awarding the Palestinians the trappings of an independent state. Lumped under the rubric of the "Palestinian police" were all the security bodies that fulfilled combat and terror roles against Israel, the intelligence and preventive intelligence bodies, as well as those active in policing and maintaining order.

Following the Hamas victory in the parliamentary elections of January 2006, Hamas established a new security force - the Executive Force - subordinate to the Ministry of Interior, which was a military force intended for "qualitative missions" in the fight against Israel and elements opposed to the regime. Hamas ally Jamal Abu Samhadana, who headed the Popular Resistance Committees terror organization, was placed in charge of this force.

Following the June 2007 military coup that enabled Hamas to take over the Gaza Strip, Hamas authorities conducted a reorganization of the Palestinian security forces, known as the "Palestinian police." Its main components include:

  • The Police - infantry forces that are intended also to fight against Israel, comprised of the Rapid Intervention Force, the Executive Force, the Naval Police, and the Military Police
  • National Security - an infantry force
  • Security and Protection - a skilled force loyal to the Hamas regime and charged with providing security for the leadership and sensitive institutions
  • Internal Security - the preventive intelligence apparatus
  • Civil Defense - evacuation and rescue forces

An analysis of the lists of Palestinians slain in 2007 and 2008 reveals that those serving in all of the Palestinian security apparatuses took part in terror activity and fighting against the IDF.2 The Hamas leadership presented these organizations alongside "the Palestinian Resistance" as the spearhead of the continued armed struggle and the jihad for liberating all of Palestine.

How Many Slain Palestinian "Policemen"?

The Palestinian police published an official list of 231 "policemen" killed in the course of the Gaza operation. Ihab al-Ghussein, spokesman for the Palestinian Ministry of Interior, later divulged that the number of Palestinian "police" killed totaled 230, the Security and Protection apparatus lost 50, National Security and Internal Security had 10 slain, and Civil Defense 11. This makes a total of 301 killed among the various Palestinian security apparatuses of the Hamas government.3

This study examined the official published lists of policemen as well as the lists of fatalities put out by the Palestinian human rights organizations PCHR and El-Mizan, as well as additional information published in open sources (such as the websites of the Palestinian Authority, the Hamas government, and the Palestinian press). The total data listed the names of 343 who were defined as Palestinian "policemen" or "security personnel" killed during the course of the Gaza operation.

The Connection between the Palestinian Security Forces and the Palestinian Terror Organizations

An analysis of the list of slain Palestinian security forces shows that of the 343 killed, 258 (75.2 percent) were Hamas members, almost all of them members of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas.4 Twelve more were members of the Popular Resistance Committees, eight belonged to the military wings of Fatah, three were members of Islamic Jihad, four were defined as "fighters" whose organizational affiliation is unknown, and one belonged to the "Army of the Umma," an extreme Islamic terror organization identified as an al-Qaeda offshoot.

In the official fatality list published by the Palestinian police, only one policeman was listed as a member of the traffic division, senior NCO Hussein Naim Hussein Abbas, who was also a member of the al-Qassam Brigades.

Another 27 fighters belonged to units undergoing infantry training intended for fighting against Israel. Thus, the total number of terror activists and fighters among those killed from the Palestinian security apparatuses totals 313, or 91 percent of the fatalities.

In the December 27, 2008, attack on an officer training course at Gaza police headquarters, 89 dead were counted, according to the PCHR. Of these, 60 (67 percent) belonged to Hamas and almost all were members of the al-Qassam Brigades. Two belonged to the military wings of Fatah and one to the Popular Resistance Committees. Eighteen came from units that were undergoing infantry training intended for fighting against Israel. Thus, the total number of terror activists and fighters among those killed at police headquarters was 81 (91 percent).

Ten Examples of "Policemen" from Hamas' Military Wing

Among those killed in the IDF attack on police headquarters on December 27 were the following members of the military wing of Hamas:

  1. Omar Bakr Shimali (b. 1988) was a member of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades. Shimali began as an activist in the Hamas student organization (al-Kutla al-Islamiya). He was assigned to a "Special Unit" and was stationed at front-line positions. At the same time, Shimali was active in the military police and worked at police headquarters.5
  2. Mohammed Khaled Shahiber (b. 1987) joined the al-Qassam Brigades in 2007 and was stationed at front-line positions.6
  3. Bilal Mahmoud Omar (b. 1989) joined the Muslim Brotherhood in 2006 and at the same time was active in the Hamas security apparatus. In 2007 he joined the al-Qassam Brigades and was assigned to forward positions. He served as a security guard at the home of Police Commander Tawfik Jabber.7
  4. Sidqi Ismail Hamad (b. 1983) was active in Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, and in mid-2008 joined the al-Qassam Brigades. He served as a bodyguard for Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh. He was an officer with the rank of lieutenant in the Security and Protection apparatus.8
  5. Mohammed Tawfik al-Nimra (b. 1986) joined Hamas in 2003 and also swore loyalty to the Muslim Brotherhood. In 2006 he joined the al-Qassam Brigades and was stationed in front-line positions.9
  6. Mohammed Ziad al-Nabih (b. 1981) joined Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood in 1995 and the al-Qassam Brigades in 2004.10
  7. Nasser Abdallah al-Ghara (b. 1962) joined Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood in 1989, and in 2004 he joined the al-Qassam Brigades. He was active in the engineering unit that was engaged in preparing explosive charges.11
  8. Nahez Salim abu-Namous (b. 1989) joined the al-Qassam Brigades in 2007 and underwent infantry and mortar training.12
  9. Hussam Muhammed al-Majaida (b. 1982) joined Hamas in 2004 and a year later the al-Qassam Brigades. He was active in the Executive Force of the Palestinian Police established by Hamas in 2006.13
  10. Hassan Maher Hassan Aruk (b. 1985) was active in the al-Qassam Brigades and was stationed in front-line positions.14

No "Friendly" Fire Incidents Among Palestinians

The Palestinian terror organizations reported on the intensive fighting they conducted against IDF forces within densely populated urban areas of Gaza. There are reports about the launching of many hundreds of mortar shells in populated Palestinian areas, the launching of antitank missiles at Palestinian houses entered by IDF forces, small arms fire and machine gun fire at IDF forces within Palestinian neighborhoods, the detonation of powerful explosive charges near Palestinian houses, booby-trapped houses, and setting explosive charges along transportation arteries.

Nevertheless, I have yet to encounter a single report about a Palestinian who was killed or even lightly wounded by "friendly" Palestinian fire. All the Palestinians killed and wounded were attributed exclusively to the IDF, while none of the human rights organizations speculate about this manifest miracle. On the other hand, in all of Israel's wars, the IDF sustained a number of losses from "friendly" fire, including four out of the ten soldiers killed in the Gaza operation.

Implications

The charges made against the IDF for presumably killing "traffic cops" and "innocent policemen" fulfilling a civilian role are incorrect. The decisive majority of the Palestinian "police" were members of the military wings of the Palestinian terror organizations (primarily Hamas) and fighters who had undergone military training. The recruitment of Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades members into the official security services allowed the Hamas government to pay their salaries out of the government budget.

The human rights organizations which reported on Palestinian casualties in the Gaza operation failed to mention the affiliation of hundreds of Palestinian security personnel who were members of terrorist organizations and who were trained fighters, thus artificially inflating the list of "civilians" killed by the IDF.

*     *     *

Notes

1. http://police.ps/ar/articles.php?action=listarticles&id=3
2. http://www.jcpa.org.il/Templates/showpage.asp?FID=528&DBID=1&LNGID=2&TMID=99&IID=19183
A similar study on the 2008 fatalities has been completed and will be published shortly.
3. http://www.moqawmh.com/ara/index.php?act=News&id=2649
4. A table (in Hebrew) analyzing each name appears on the Jerusalem Center's Hebrew website at: http://www.jcpa.org.il/JCPAHeb/SendFile.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=2&GID=475
5. http://www.alqassam.ps/arabic/sohdaa5.php?id=1342
6. http://www.alqassam.ps/arabic/sohdaa5.php?id=1352
7. http://www.alqassam.ps/arabic/sohdaa5.php?id=1287
8. http://www.alqassam.ps/arabic/sohdaa5.php?id=1396
9. http://www.alqassam.ps/arabic/sohdaa5.php?id=1399
10. http://www.alqassam.ps/arabic/sohdaa5.php?id=1402
11. http://www.alqassam.ps/arabic/sohdaa5.php?id=1406
12. http://www.alqassam.ps/arabic/sohdaa5.php?id=1393
13. http://www.alqassam.ps/arabic/sohdaa5.php?id=1380
14. http://www.sabiroon.org/news/specialNewsDetails.php?code=730&category=7

*     *     *

Col. (res.) Jonathan D. Halevi is the research director for the Orient Research Group and a research fellow of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. Halevi previously served as a senior adviser for political planning in Israel's Foreign Ministry and as head of the data and information branch in the IDF Spokesperson's Unit. This Jerusalem Issue Brief is based on his report published in Hebrew on May 24, 2009.

Oorlogsmisdaden Gaza door beide kanten volgens VN commissie Goldstone


Een belangrijk probleem bij al die 'fact finding missions' n.a.v. de Gaza Oorlog is, dat ze zich vooral baseren op Palestijnse bronnen en ooggetuigenverslagen. Daardoor blijft de militaire context vaak buiten beschouwing. Het is achteraf heel moeilijk na te gaan of een bepaalde legeroperatie op dat moment gerechtvaardigd was gezien het te verwachten militaire gewin en het te verwachten risico op burgerslachtoffers. Bovendien wordt alleen naar de maand waarin de daadwerkelijke gevechten plaatsvonden gekeken, en niet naar de periode die daaraan voorafging en de duizenden raketten die Hamas op Israel heeft afgevuurd. Ook de politieke doelen van Hamas en de steun die zij krijgt van Hezbollah, Syrië en Iran zullen wel zijn genegeerd, net als in het Gaza rapport van Amnesty International.
 
RP
---------------

Last update - 17:51 15/09/2009       
UN: Israel, Palestinians guilty of Gaza war crimes
By Shlomo Shamir and Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondents
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1114780.html
 
 
United Nations investigator Judge Richard Goldstone said on Tuesday that his commission had found that both Israel and the Palestinians committed war crimes during the offensive on the Gaza Strip earlier this year.
 
Goldstone concluded that Israel committed actions amounting to war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity, during its December 27-January 18 military operations in the Hamas-ruled territory.
 
A summary of his nearly 600-page report on the fact-finding mission's conclusions also said the firing of rockets into Israel by Palestinian militants where there were no military targets would constitute war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity, as well.
 
Goldstone, a former chief UN war crimes prosecutor heading the four-person inquiry team, said he would pass on his findings to the International Court of Justice in the Hague.
 
Israel refused to cooperate with the mission because it regarded it as having biased instructions from the UN Human Rights Council, which has a track record of repeatedly singling out Israel for criticism and turning a blind eye to any Palestinian wrongdoing.
 
The Jerusalem-based NGO Monitor earlier this month cast doubt as to the neutrality of the Goldstone Commission on Gaza.
 
Goldstone said in July he regards the mandate of the fact-finding mission as requiring an independent investigation into all alleged violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law during the IDF's 22-day offensive.
 
"The testimonies we have heard from victims and witnesses... have been very difficult to hear, but I believe it is important that we listen to these stories," said Goldstone.

Blauwdruk gepresenteerd voor vredesakkoord volgens Geneefs Initiatief


Mooi. Nu de uitvoering nog. Het probleem is dat zonder wederzijds vertrouwen, en zonder dat beide kanten er vanuit kunnen gaan dat de ander zich aan z'n afspraken houdt, alle mooie plannen gedoemd zijn om te falen.
 
RP
------------
 

Israelis, Palestinians present 'Geneva Initiative' peace manual

Sep. 15, 2009
Associated Press , THE JERUSALEM POST

Israeli and Palestinian activists on Tuesday presented the most detailed vision yet of what a peace deal could look like - more than 400 pages crammed with maps, timetables for troop withdrawals and even a list of weapons a non-militarized Palestine would be barred from having.

The manual has no official standing, but has generated interest among Israeli and Palestinian leaders and is meant to show it's still possible to establish a Palestinian state alongside Israel, despite many setbacks, said those involved in the drafting.

Organizers acknowledged that many obstacles would have to be cleared: The plan is complicated and expensive, proposed borders would require the removal of tens of thousands of Jewish settlers, and Hamas militants remain in control of the Gaza Strip. Nonetheless, they stressed the progress that had been made, and said the plan could serve as a ready-made model for the two sides to work off.

The core of the plan is a Palestinians a state in nearly 98 percent of the West Bank, all of the Gaza Strip and the Arab-populated areas of Jerusalem. The plan was put together over the past two years by Israeli and Palestinian experts, ex-government officials and former negotiators. It builds on the 50-page outline of a peace deal published in 2003 by the same group, known as the Geneva Initiative.

dinsdag 15 september 2009

Een nachtmerrie over de toekomst van Israel


Leon de Winter is niet de enige met nachtmerries over de toekomst van Israel. Volgens sommigen wordt een dergelijk doemscenario veroorzaakt door teveel concessies door Israel, zoals in onderstaand artikel, volgens sommigen juist door te weinig concessies.
 
Pessimist Vic Rosenthal concludeert:
 
Enough.
What can we learn from this nightmare?
  • Iran must not be allowed to go nuclear, no matter what.
  • The Golan must not be transferred to Syria, no matter what.
  • An imposed 'peace' settlement with the Palestinians must be resisted, no matter what.
No matter what.
 
Daarmee laat hij weinig ruimte voor een oplossing van het conflict. Wat is een niet-opgelegde vrede? Zonder enige druk zijn de kansen op vrede klein. Natuurlijk moeten er stevige veiligheidsgaranties komen voor Israel, en moeten die worden afgedwongen, en natuurlijk is een en ander pas mogelijk als de droom van een Israel-vrij Midden-Oosten onder veel Arabieren heeft plaatsgemaakt voor realisme en de wil tot coëxistentie. En natuurlijk moet Israel de eigen extremisten hard aanpakken. Een en ander is echter pas mogelijk als daar druk van buiten op staat. Druk die niet alleen op Israel, maar minstens evenzeer op de Arabieren en Palestijnen wordt uitgeoefend.
 
RP
-------------
 

A nightmare

<http://fresnozionism.org/2009/09/a-nightmare/>
September 13th, 2009

I recently had a daytime nightmare. A horrific vision of what could happen if events proceeded along a not-unlikely course. But there are no nuclear explosions in my nightmare. It doesn't end with a bang…

It's August 2011. Iran, having stockpiled enough highly enriched uranium for several bombs, begins to actually construct one. Israel, its red line crossed, starts the countdown to execute the long-planned operation which is expected to set the Iranian project back 10 years, when it receives an ultimatum from the US:

The operation must not be carried out. If you go ahead, we will prevent it by any means necessary, including engaging and even shooting down Israeli planes.

Since 2008, the US has had an x-band radar installation in the Negev which can detect 'even a bird' taking off. The facility is operated and guarded by US  personnel; it is off limits to Israelis. It was installed in order to provide early warning of Iranian missiles, but there is no way that Israel can launch a major (or minor) air operation without the US knowing.

Israel, not prepared to fight the US Navy and Air Force, backs down. The US gives assurances that it will not permit Iran to attack Israel. Iran proceeds to install its new Russian air defense system.

Meanwhile, the US finishes up its withdrawal from Iraq. Syria, in return for the Golan Heights, which it received in January as part of the comprehensive Mideast Peace settlement imposed by the Obama Administration and the Quartet, has stopped allowing Sunni insurgents and supplies to transit the border, and the majority Shiite government has managed to suppress the remaining Sunni insurgency. Obama's foreign policy appears to be a major success, having brought peace to Iraq, ending the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Golan Heights, and creating the long-sought after state of Palestine.

Peace in our time has been achieved, says Obama, although he knows enough not to use exactly those words.

What could more natural than for the two mightiest Shiite powers to make an alliance, says the Iraqi Prime Minister, as he announces a five-year economic and military cooperation pact with Iran? And while there is some trepidation that efforts of the new Hezbollah government in Lebanon to disarm Christian militias could lead to strife in that country, most Western diplomats think that the idea of a multi-ethnic state was never really practical.

In Israel, life goes on. Especially in Tel Aviv, you can barely tell the difference between pre-peace days and now. One problem that everyone notices is that air fares are much higher, what with oil at $120/bbl. and rising, and especially since that USAIR  Airbus was hit by an antiaircraft missile fired from the West Bank just as it lifted off from Ben Gurion Airport, killing 247 passengers and crew. President Barghouti of Palestine expressed his sincere condolences to the families of the victims, but indicated that his police have insufficient resources, not enough helicopters, night-vision gear and communications equipment to effectively carry out their mission of fighting terrorism. As a result, the only carrier flying to and from Israel is El Al, whose planes are equipped with special devices to divert the type of missile known to be in the possession of terrorists.

The EL Al aircraft are heavily loaded on trips to America and Europe as those Israelis who can afford it take long vacations outside of the country 'for the duration'.

The Israeli government has begun a project to reinforce buildings and build protective walls around towns in the area of the Syrian border. Although the peace treaty calls for an end of conflict between Israel and Syria, guerrillas thought to be associated with Hezbollah have been operating in the area, and Syrian troops are not motivated to stop them.  Meanwhile, Golan Druze who are considered pro-Israel were evacuated ahead of the Syrians and are now living in temporary camps in the Negev along with several hundred thousand settlers who were removed from the West Bank.

The evacuation of West Bank settlers was carried out with only a few hundred casualties on the part of the settlers, most of whom left their homes without armed resistance. There were a few isolated settlements where armed Jewish militants resisted evacuation, and special units of the new Volunteer Army, made up of known reliable personnel, were sent in to neutralize them. There are still some holdouts, and Israel has received sharply-worded protests from the government of Palestine in regard to them.

Right now the biggest construction project in Israel is the Palestine Contiguity Highway, to connect the Nahal Oz crossing with Hebron and thence north along the route of the existing Rt. 60 to the capital of Palestine, al-Quds. It's to be a 150-meter wide corridor with electronic fences on either side, a highway in the middle, and service facilities along the way. Palestinian military vehicles can be seen on service roads, protecting the autos and trucks on the highway from Jewish guerrillas who lately have been harassing them, shooting and then quickly escaping. In some places, the fence is being replaced by a concrete wall to prevent this. Indeed some sections of the dismantled security barrier have been pressed into service.

This project, as well as the yet-to-be started housing for relocated settlers and Golan Druze, has been slowed by the worldwide economic depression caused by the high oil price. When asked about the possibility of increasing production, new OPEC Secretary-General Gholamhossein Nozari of Iran indicated that prices had reached a 'natural level' and indeed were at last compensating Middle Eastern and South American nations for years of Western exploitation.

The IDF has recently reduced standards yet again, as the difficulty of recruitment increases. Many secular youth are going abroad when they reach army age, and national-religious types – especially from the relocation centers in the Negev – are as likely to join an underground group like Tzvat Hashem as the IDF. The US-funded and trained (by General Keith Dayton) Volunteer Army has top-notch equipment, but lacks motivation. It also spends a great deal of time chasing Tzvat Hashem fighters, who make commando raids into Palestinian territory, provoking retaliatory Katyusha missile fire from the Palestinian National Army. The Israeli population shifts away from border areas which become more and more insecure.

In the North, Hezbollah has an estimated 100,000 short-range rockets targeted at Israel. Iran, which already dictates policy to Saudi Arabia and the Emirates, supports the Ikhwan in Egypt, despite ideological differences, because it prefers Islamic to Western-oriented rule. The weak government of Gamal Mubarak is overthrown, Egypt announces its abrogation of the peace treaty with Israel, and sends the Israeli ambassador home. The US cuts off aid, but Iran and Russia step into the vacuum. Iranian satellite Iraq begins to apply pressure to Jordan to also end its cooperation with Israel.

One of the great accomplishments of the peace treaty was the agreement that, while their inalienable right of return was acknowledged, Arab refugees would defer the exercise of this right to an unspecified time when the government of Israel should agree. US Secretary of State Malley even remarked "who said Arabs don't know compromise?"

But now the Palestinian citizens of Israel (formerly called 'Israeli Arabs') demand an equal right of representation with the Jewish population, as well as a new flag and national anthem, etc. And the UN security council, on a motion introduced by the Iranian representative decides that if the rogue state of Israel does not grant these oppressed Arabs their 'civil rights', punishing economic sanctions will be applied to the already weakened Israel.

The Iranian ambassador to the US explains just what could happen to the price of oil, the US abstains, and the resolution passes. Israel, already reeling economically and socially, has no choice but to agree. More Israeli Jews begin to think that their future lies elsewhere.

Now at every opportunity, Arab Members of the Knesset introduce bills calling for the return of their refugee brothers. How can they be prevented from exercising a right that has been recognized in international treaty? How can they be allowed to continue their miserable existence (Palestine has only allowed a few to integrate, preferring to keep the great masses in camps)?

It becomes an international cause célèbre.
…
Enough.
What can we learn from this nightmare?

  • Iran must not be allowed to go nuclear, no matter what.
  • The Golan must not be transferred to Syria, no matter what.
  • An imposed 'peace' settlement with the Palestinians must be resisted, no matter what.
No matter what.

-- Vic Rosenthal
<http://fresnozionism.org>

Nieuwe bloedlaster over Joodse orgaanhandel Algerijnse kinderen


Het lijkt er soms op dat we weer in de donkere middeleeuwen zijn beland, toen heksen op de brandstapel werden gegooid en Joden in de inquisitie verdwenen, allemaal gebaseerd op geruchten en broodje-aap verhalen. Hopelijk zijn er meer Arabieren zoals Hassan Masiky, en laten zij een krachtig geluid horen tegen deze gevaarlijke nonsens.
 
RP
--------------

'Jews harvesting Algerian kids' organs'

Sep. 14, 2009
Haviv Rettig Gur , THE JERUSALEM POST

 

The anti-Semitic blogosphere and many Arab and Muslim media outlets are aflutter in recent days over accusations of an international Jewish conspiracy to kidnap Algerian children and harvest their organs.

Unlike the multiple conspiracy theories about Jews circulating among radical fringe organizations online, this one seems to be gaining momentum on mainstream Arab and Muslim Web sites.

According to the story, first reported by Algeria's Al-Khabar daily, bands of Moroccans and Algerians have allegedly been roaming the streets of Algeria's cities kidnapping young children, who are then transported across the border into Morocco. From the Moroccan city of Oujda, the children are then purportedly sold to Israelis and American Jews, who then harvest their organs for sale in Israel and the United States. The organs are said to fetch anywhere from $20,000 to $100,000.

The source for the Al-Khabar report seems to be a Dr. Mustafa Khayatti, head of the Algerian National Committee for the Development of Health Research. Khayatti reportedly claimed that several Jews were arrested in New York in connection with the trade. He claimed Interpol knew of the situation and was leading the investigation into the abductions.

"The arrest of Jewish organ trafficking gangs does not mean that the danger has gone; top officials and specialists in this issue assert that there are other Jewish gangs who remain active in several Arab countries," Khayatti was quoted as saying.

Picking up on the Algerian report, the official Iranian news agency PressTV claimed that the Jewish group "is said to be connected to Israeli Rabbi Levi Rosenbaum, who was recently arrested in New Jersey for the direct involvement in importing human organs."

The report also ran without scrutiny on certain American news outlets, including the Web site of the California-based American Arab weekly Watan.

With its rapid online dissemination, the report has begun to draw fire from those worried about the ease with which such a story, lacking any evidence, can spread in the Muslim world.

The report "sounds as [though] Dr. Khayatti is well connected within the FBI and has access to Interpol documents," but this was not the case, wrote Hassan Masiky, a reporter for the American Moroccan news service MoroccoBoard.com.

"Needless to say, neither Al-Khabar nor PressTV provided a source for their story, other than an obscure low-level Algerian bureaucrat," Masiky complained.

"What is dangerous in this work of fantasy is the plot to package the true story of the arrest of Rabbi Levi Rosenbaum in New Jersey with the nonsense, nightmarish tale out of Algeria," he said.

Masiky noted that the Algerian-Moroccan border was closed and carefully watched by the countries' armies. It was therefore difficult to ascertain how such a plan could be implemented without help from the Algerian state.

"To their credit, the Algerian authorities, up until now, did not ask their Moroccan counterparts for an official investigation, as most Algerians ask themselves: Who are these kidnapped children? Where are their parents? Who conducts these organ harvesting operations? How are the children and the organs transported from Morocco to Israel? And more importantly, how can the Algerian army allow such illicit traffic to go unabated?" Masiky wrote.

The Iranian PressTV noted in its coverage that the report followed claims made in the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet last month of an IDF conspiracy to harvest organs from kidnapped Palestinians.

The connection indicated "a possible link between the Israeli military and the mafia of human organs detected in the US," the Iranian report said.

Aftonbladet, too, did not offer evidence in its article, relying on claims by a handful of Palestinians who spoke to the reporter.

 

Advocaten maken bezwaar tegen vooringenomenheid Gaza rapport VN-commissie Goldstone

 
Aanstaande maandag komt het rapport van de VN commissie Goldstone naar oorlogsmisdaden in de Gazastrook uit. Een van de onderzoekers sprak zich al voor het onderzoek over de zaak uit, en is bovendien bekend van eerdere anti-Israel uitspraken en activiteiten. Een aantal advocaten meent dat het rapport daarom partijdig is en dat de betreffende onderzoeker moet terugtreden.
 
RP
----------------

Lawyers challenge Goldstone's UN Gaza Report - Report to condemn Israel.

U.N.'s Imminent Gaza Report Challenged by 50 U.K. & Canadian Lawyers for 'Bias'
Published by UN Watch - at September 13, 2009 in Goldstone "Fact Finding" Mission for UNHRC and Human Rights Council (UNHRC).

 
 
Arab and Islamic States Plan to Use Goldstone Report for Indictment of Israel by International Criminal Court
 
Geneva, Sept. 13, 2009 - An unprecedented team of fifty British and Canadian lawyers are challenging the refusal of a U.N. investigator to step down from an inquiry on the recent Gaza conflict, arguing that London School of Economics professor Christine Chinkin's participation on the panel - after she declared Israel guilty prior to seeing any evidence - "necessarily compromises the integrity of this inquiry and its report."
 
Arab and Islamic countries are hoping to use the report, by a UN Human Rights Council inquiry headed by former South African judge Richard Goldstone — and due for release today — to indict Israel at the International Criminal Court, a move recently encouraged by UN rights chief Navi Pillay. However, Geneva diplomats say U.S. and Western states will block any such attempt.
 
In submissions filed separately from both countries, prominent attorneys from law firms and human rights organizations in Great Britain and Canada are challenging the U.N.'s rejection of a request that Chinkin be disqualified due to her January condemnation of Israel on the very disputed issues that the inquiry is meant to impartially examine.
 
In early May, UN  Watch, a Geneva non-governmental organization that monitors the world body's human rights system, appeared before the U.N. panel to urge Goldstone and the other members to disqualify Chinkin, invoking "the impartiality principle that Goldstone promised to uphold," and "the due process requirements of morality, logic and international law."
 
Despite the NGO's filing of legal briefs in July and August, as reported by Agence France Presse and Deutsche Presse Agentur, the Goldstone mission waited until recently to respond, summarily rejecting the petition. UN Watch's appeal last week to the new president of the Human Rights Council, Belgian ambassador Alex van Meeuwen, received no response. The team of 50 lawyers has now launched a direct appeal to Chinkin that she step down.
 
In an August interview with South Africa's Business Day, Goldstone admitted that "If it had been a judicial inquiry, that letter [Chinkin] signed would have been a ground for disqualification."
 
According to Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, "Goldstone's implied argument that his inquiry is somehow exempt from the impartiality rule simply defies logic, morality and established international law. At the same time, Goldstone's effective admission that his report is the product of something other than an impartial panel seriously calls into question the legal possibility of attributing any evidentiary weight or credibility to their report."
 
Apart from Chinkin, the other three members of the panel — Goldstone, Hina Jilani, and Desmond Travers — also implied Israeli guilt prior to their seeing any evidence, declaring in March that "The events in Gaza have shocked us to the core."
 
According to Neuer, "the Arab-controlled Human Rights Council deliberately selected individuals who made up their mind well in advance not only that Israel was guilty, but that a democratic state with an imperfect but respected legal system should be considered the same as or worse than Hamas, a group whose very raison d'etre is the killing and terrorizing of civilians."
 
The two separate appeals by 50 British and Canadian lawyers follow below.
For more information, see www.unwatch.org/goldstone.
 
________________________
 
The U.K. appeal
 
Professor Christine Chinkin
Law Department
London School of Economics
Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE
 
10 September 2009
 
Dear Professor Chinkin,
 
We wish to express our support for the UN Watch request that you be disqualified from the United Nations Human Rights Council's fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict and our disappointment that this well-founded request was recently rejected by the mission, as reported by the Jewish Chronicle ("Dispute over 'biased' Gaza inquiry professor," 28 August 2009).
 
Judge Richard Goldstone, as head of the mission, promised at the outset that it would be impartial. Impartiality requires that fact-finders be free of any commitment to a preconceived outcome. Because you expressed yourself on the merits of the issues prior to seeing any of the evidence, you cannot be considered impartial.
 
On 11 January 2009, The Sunday Times published a letter signed by you and others, which stated that you "categorically reject" Israel's claim that its military operation in Gaza constituted self-defence against the Hamas rocket attacks "deplorable as they are" and that "Israel's actions amount to aggression, not self-defence". You concluded that Israel was acting contrary to international law.
 
When you were asked about this during a May 2009 meeting with Geneva NGOs, you denied that your impartiality was compromised, saying that your Sunday Times letter only addressed jus ad bellum, and not jus in bello. (Audio recording at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfiHbvTpmKQ.)
 
However, your letter to The Sunday Times was not limited to Israel's decision to conduct a military operation in Gaza. It also expressed the categorical view that the Palestinians killed in the operation were "mostly civilians", that humanitarian relief was blockaded by Israel, and that the operation was contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law. It concluded that "the manner and scale of [Israel's] operations in Gaza amount to an act of aggression and is contrary to international law".
 
All these issues clearly bear on the fact-finding mission in which you are engaged. As you know, all are disputed. As a professor of international law at the London School of Economics, you must recognize that your actions have given rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As colleagues in the law and academia, each of us committed to fairness and the principle that justice must be seen to be done, we are disappointed that you have refused to step down. Your continued participation necessarily compromises the integrity of this inquiry and its report.
 
Yours faithfully
 
Nigel Peters QC
Avril Mailer
Caroline Turner
Alan Steinfeld QC
Professor Ashley Grossman
Daniel Janner QC
Daniel Weiner
David Halpern QC
David Ziskind
Dr Howard Kahn
Jonathan Arkush
Jonathan Fisher QC
Jonathan D. C. Turner
Laura Dahan
Philip Gershuny
Rebekah Gershuny
Simon Monty QC
Simon Myerson QC
Jonathan Lux
 
__________________________
 
The Canadian appeal
 
Professor Christine Chinkin
Law Department
London School of Economics
Houghton Street
London, WC2A 2AE
 
September 11, 2009
 
Dear Professor Chinkin,
 
We wish to express our support for the UN Watch request that you be disqualified from the United Nations Human Rights Council's fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict and our disappointment that this well-founded request was recently rejected by the mission, as reported by London's Jewish Chronicle ("Dispute over 'biased' Gaza inquiry professor," 28 August 2009).
 
Judge Richard Goldstone, as head of the mission, promised at the outset that it would be impartial. Impartiality requires that fact-finders be free of any commitment to a preconceived outcome. Because you expressed yourself on the merits of the issues prior to seeing any of the evidence, you cannot be considered impartial.
 
On 11 January 2009, The Sunday Times published a letter signed by you and others, which stated that you "categorically reject" Israel's right to claim self-defence against Hamas rocket attacks "deplorable as they are" and that "Israel's actions amount to aggression, not self-defence". You concluded that Israel was acting contrary to international law.
 
When you were asked about this during a May 2009 meeting with Geneva NGOs, you denied that your impartiality was compromised, saying that your Sunday Times letter only addressed jus ad bellum, and not jus in bello. (Audio recording at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfiHbvTpmKQ.)
 
However, your letter to The Sunday Times was not limited to Israel's decision to conduct a military operation in Gaza. It also expressed the categorical view that the Palestinians killed in the operation were "mostly civilians", that humanitarian relief was blockaded by Israel, and that the operation was contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law. It concluded that "the manner and scale of [Israel's] operations in Gaza amount to an act of aggression and is contrary to international law".
 
All these are disputed issues which must surely bear on the fact-finding mission in which you are engaged. As a professor of international law at the London School of Economics, it behooves you to recognize that your actions have given rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. Your refusal to step down necessarily compromises the integrity of this inquiry and its report.
 
Yours faithfully,
 
Noam Goodman
Stanley W L Freedman
Eric M. Levy
David Matas Q.C.
Allan Adel
Marvin Kurtz
Anita Bromberg
Monty Warsh
Ari Itman
Jeffrey Citron
David Nadler
Jason Caron
Alan Grad
Alan Litwack
Andrea Safer
Lawrence Witt
Tibor Hollander
Norman Bacal
Saul Schipper
David Chodikoff
Andrew Cohen
Aren Prupas
Dean Chenoy
Joel Goldberg
Adam Kardash
Mark Jadd
Hayden Solomons
David M. Goodman
Danny Kaufer
Adam S. Goodman
David Steinberg
Igor Ellyn Q.C.
 

UNIFIL wist van geplande Katjoesha aanval uit Libanon op Israel


Afgelopen vrijdag werden (voor de vierde keer dit jaar) vanuit Libanon enkele Katjoesha raketten op Israel afgevuurd. Volgens een Libanese krant was de UNIFIL vredesmacht al tien dagen van tevoren van de geplande aanval op de hoogte, maar ondernam zij weinig.
 
RP
----------------
 
UNIFIL Reportedly Had Advance Warning of Katyusha Attack on Israel
http://www.naharnet.com/domino/tn/NewsDesk.nsf/getstory?openform&FB95DA2778DCF77CC225763000440B59
 
 
U.N. peacekeeping forces were informed about the rocket firing on northern Israel 10 days ahead of the attack, the daily An-Nahar reported Sunday.
 
It said UNIFIL headquarters in the border town of Naqoura received the warning from several sources.

They were even told about the type of rockets that would be fired, AN-Nahar said.

It said UNIFIL relayed the information to the Lebanese army two days before the attack.
 
Israel filed a complaint to the United Nations holding the Lebanese government responsible and said Beirut wasn't doing enough to prevent the presence of armed groups and weapons.
 
Beirut, 13 Sep 09, 09:30
 
 

maandag 14 september 2009

Voorwaarden overeengekomen voor hervatting Israelisch-Palestijnse vredesonderhandelingen


It is understood that this will be accompanied by a public American and European declaration that the permanent border will be based on the border of June 4, 1967. Both sides may agree to alter the border based on territorial exchanges.
(...)
Likewise, Netanyahu's demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, and that the Arab world embark on normalizing ties with Israel, will not constitute preconditions to an "early recognition" of Palestine.
 
Waarom kunnen de VS en de EU niet gelijktijdig verklaren dat het Palestijnse vluchtelingenprobleem binnen de Palestijnse staat opgelost moet worden? Zo lijkt het nogal een eenzijdige vertoning te worden, waarbij de Palestijnen allerlei garanties krijgen, en Israel van alles op moet geven.
 
RP
--------------------

'Terms set for renewal of Israel-PA talks'
By Akiva Eldar - Haaretz
Last update - 01:54 13/09/2009
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1114129.html

 
Negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians will resume next month on the basis of an understanding that the establishment of a Palestinian state will be officially announced in two years.

Palestinian and European Union sources told Haaretz that talks will initially focus on determining the permanent border between Israel and the West Bank.

Due to the Palestinians' reservations over establishing a state with temporary borders, as was proposed during the second stage of the road map, this step will probably be defined as "early recognition" of Palestine.

It is understood that this will be accompanied by a public American and European declaration that the permanent border will be based on the border of June 4, 1967. Both sides may agree to alter the border based on territorial exchanges.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's refusal to discuss Jerusalem and the Palestinian refugees in the initial negotiation stages will not be allowed to delay the announcement of an independent Palestinian state.

Likewise, Netanyahu's demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, and that the Arab world embark on normalizing ties with Israel, will not constitute preconditions to an "early recognition" of Palestine.

A Palestinian source said Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has decided that the chief negotiator at the Palestine Liberation Organization, Dr. Saeb Erekat, will lead the Palestinian negotiating team.

Abbas may also hold private meetings with Prime Minister Netanyahu at the same time, as he did with Netanyahu's predecessor, Ehud Olmert.

Netanyahu said last week in private talks that the differences with the Americans over the settlements now center on whether the freeze in construction will last nine months, as he is proposing, or a full year, which is what the Americans are asking.

The prime minister said he was confident that a compromise would be reached in the coming days, possibly during a meeting scheduled with U.S. special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, who arrived in Israel last night.

An agreement with the Americans on the issue of settlement construction is expected to pave the way for a tripartite meeting in New York between Abbas, Netanyahu and U.S. President Barack Obama at the UN General Assembly.

Meanwhile, a senior diplomatic source said yesterday that the proposal of the European Union High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, Javier Solana, that the United Nations accept Palestine as a full member within two years, was made with the support at the highest levels of the U.S. administration.

The plan is based, among others things, on ideas President Shimon Peres recently put before Netanyahu and foreign leaders, including Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, as well as Mitchell and Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Moratinos. During those conversations, Peres referred to the Prime Minister of the Palestinian Authority, Salam Fayyad, as a "Palestinian Ben-Gurion."

The Israeli president was referring to Fayyad's plan to build the infrastructure for a Palestinian state and to declare its independence as a state de facto, in two years.

Netanyahu has not yet commented on Fayyad's plan.

Syrië heeft mogelijk meer nucleaire installaties volgens voormalig IAEA expert


Het ziet er niet naar uit dat Iran bereid is tot serieuze onderhandelingen over haar atoomprogramma, en het optimisme dat wat dit betreft te horen is lijkt dan ook ongegrond.
 
RP
------------

Former IAEA Expert: Syria may have more nuclear sites

Syria's relative lack of protest at the Israeli bombing of their nuclear site might make sense if they are trying to keep attention away from other sites.

===============

Schulte: Syria may have more nuke sites

Sep. 10, 2009
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST

Syria may be operating more nuclear sites, apart from the reactor at Deir Azour which was bombed by Israel on September 6, 2007 in what came to be known as Operation Orchard, former US envoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Gregory Schulte told Channel 10 Thursday evening.

"I think there were other activities that gave us concern, that gave the IAEA concern… IAEA inspectors actually asked to go to a number of other sites, and the Syrians wouldn't let them go there; they claimed they were military sites. They claimed the uranium particles that the inspectors found at the destroyed reactor came from Israeli bombs," Schulte said.

In the past, the Syrian accusation was brushed aside both by the IAEA and Israel, as the uranium used to strengthen the metal of shells is of a different type than the uranium used in producing nuclear energy.

Schulte went on to criticize the conduct of Mohammed ElBaradei, the Egyptian-born outgoing IAEA chief who has been accused by Israel many times of being biased.

"I tell you Mohammed ElBaradei was not happy ... he was mad at Israel, he was mad at the United States; he didn't express any discontent about Syria," he said.

Schulte added that ElBaradei issued a statement following Operation Orchard, "where he sort of deplored Israel's unilateral action, he deplored the late provision of intelligence which was a direct slap at the United States."

Moving on to the issue of Iran's nuclear pursuit, Schulte said the Islamic republic was using a tactic of stalling to the West while continuing to work on its program.

"Iran is always trying to buy time," he said. "The question is, can you sort of convince them to stop doing that, convince them that they have to negotiate seriously... so the trick is to convince them that the opportunity to buy time is running out and the need to negotiate seriously." Iran needs to "show a willingness to suspend these activities," he said, referring to enrichment of uranium, a process which can serve to produce electricity but also to build a nuclear weapon, Schulte added.

Earlier Thursday, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Teheran's envoy to the IAEA, suggested that any negotiations with Western powers would not address the Islamic republic's nuclear program, according to a report carried by Iran's state-run al-Alam television station cited by Reuters.

"Teheran is prepared to have fair and substantive talks about various problems, including the guarantee of access by all countries to nuclear energy and preventing the proliferation of nuclear arms," Soltanieh reportedly said.

"But these talks do not include Teheran's nuclear program and legal activities in this connection," he was quoted as saying. His comments came just a day after Iran presented world powers with a proposal for new talks. Teheran is faced with a US threat of harsher new sanctions over its nuclear program if it fails to begin negotiations in earnest by the United Nations General Assembly meeting at the end of September.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has ruled out negotiations over uranium enrichment, the UN's central concern regarding his country's nuclear program.

AP contributed to this report

 

Hamas onderzoekt haar tactisch falen in Gaza Oorlog


Na de Gaza Oorlog vertelden strijders van Hamas op het NOS journaal en in de krant hoe weinig Israel ze had weten te raken en vooral burgers het slachtoffer waren van Israels agressie, en om een of andere reden geloofden veel media dit verhaal kritiekloos. De waarheid is anders.
 
RP
--------------

Hamas learning the lessons of Gaza War

The real question is, who gained a strategic advantage? Did Israel squander a strategic opportunity created by a brilliant tactical advantage? The important thing is not how many Hamas people were killed, but who will rule in Gaza and in Israel in 50 years.
 
========================
 
Terrorism: Hamas seeks new doctrine after Gaza War failures
Sep. 10, 2009
jonathan spyer , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
Hamas has undertaken a major process of examination and investigation into its deeply flawed performance in the course of Operation Cast Lead, sources say. The review process is aimed at developing a new doctrine for Hamas to enable it to achieve its ambition of rivaling Hizbullah in its abilities. It remains to be seen if the reforms will deliver an improved result in renewed future hostilities with Israel or whether, as with Operation Cast Lead, Israel will once again display an ability to frustrate and set Hamas back on the tactical level.
 
Hamas carried out the first review of its performance immediately following the conclusion of hostilities. This was followed by a second major investigation in the spring, amid harsh criticism of the group's performance from its Iranian and Syrian sponsors. Izzadin al-Kassam Brigades leader Ahmed al-Ja'abari, and northern brigade commander Ahmed al-Ghandour were particularly singled out for criticism.
 
The cull of senior Hamas operatives in the course of Operation Cast Lead was heavy. Politburo members Nizar Rayyan and Said Siyam were killed. Senior commanders of the Executive Force, like Salah Abu Shareh (who headed the EF's security apparatus) and Mahmoud Watfah (head of its military wing), also lost their lives. Around 50 explosives experts are reported to have died. Operatives at this level are not easily replaced. But more fundamentally, the defensive doctrines developed by Hamas prior to Cast Lead comprehensively failed the test.
 
All of its strategically important attempts to kidnap IDF soldiers in the course of the fighting were unsuccessful (at least three close calls were reported). Its failure to score any success against the IDF's heavy armor was particularly noted. This was in stark contrast to the Second Lebanon War in 2006, in which Hizbullah's relative success in damaging a large number of tanks formed an important part of its claim of "divine victory."
 
The Hamas investigation, according to sources, was particularly focused on probing the failure to repel the IDF's push into Tel al-Hawa - Israel's deepest incursion into Gaza City. The investigation discovered widespread desertion by members of the Kassam Brigades in the face of the IDF advance. It found that many fighters, who had received instructions to withdraw if they feared being overrun, took a liberal interpretation of this, disappearing well in advance of the IDF's arrival. A Gaza rumor has it that 100 gunmen from the Zeitoun area were stripped of their membership in the organization following Cast Lead.
 
The extent of the Hamas failure can be summed up if one considers the official figures given by the organization on the ordnance fired in the course of Operation Cast Lead. According to Kassam Brigades spokesman Abu Obeideh, Hamas fired 558 rockets, of which 345 were Kassams and 213 were Grads, and 422 mortar shells; 53 sniper attacks were carried out and 79 bombs were detonated. Nineteen pitched battles with IDF forces took place.
 
The result was the death of six IDF soldiers. If one compares this with the statistics of Operation Defensive Shield in 2002 - in which 23 IDF soldiers were killed in a single battle in the Jenin refugee camp - the extent of the failure becomes apparent.
 
Hamas managed throughout the course of the Gaza war to maintain constant rocket fire on Israel. This was a significant symbolic achievement, but not a great deal more. It constitutes the sole military success of any kind for which Hamas is able to take credit.
 
Clearly, something went awry for the rulers of Gaza in the fighting. Their patrons in Teheran and Damascus were angry and concerned. The image of success, of having finally found a way to deny the IDF victory and cause Israel setbacks, is an important element in the psychological warfare of the Iran-led regional bloc. This image has taken a series of blows so far this year. The Gaza events rank high among them.
 
Hamas has therefore engaged in extensive internal discussions intended to lead to the formulation of a new doctrine. According to sources, two distinct orientations emerged from this, corresponding broadly with the growing political divide in Hamas between the veteran leadership of the movement and elements committed to a more extreme al-Qaida style approach. The latter favored the acceptance of a much higher casualty rate of Hamas fighters, through the resumption of direct attacks on Israeli forces, and the reinstatement of attacks on Israel and in the West Bank. This adventurous and probably suicidal approach, however, has not been accepted.
 
Rather Hamas has adopted a more modest series of reforms. These center on overhauling the movement's tactical doctrine, adopting a new and intensified, externally-supported training program for Kassam Brigades fighters, increased smuggling and upgrading of arms, the building of a new, underground tunnel structure and an attempt to tighten internal security.
 
Regarding the first issue, Hamas over the summer has been carrying out intensified military training at its various training camps and military academy in the Nuseirat refugee camp. The academy, ironically, is named after the Palestinian ideological godfather of al-Qaida, Dr. Abdallah Azzam. In contrast to the pre-2009 period, when Hamas took great pride in parading its military capabilities, the nature of this training has not been publicized.
 
The new approach is thought to be more offensive, and is intended to hit at the rear bases of an incoming IDF force. Hizbullah is thought to be deeply involved in the new training program. (This is not a new development. Elements who had trained with Hizbullah in the Bekaa Valley were also involved in the fighting earlier this year.)
 
On the issue of smuggling, Egyptian efforts at cracking down on weapons smuggling into Rafah have increased in recent months. In addition, as reported in the media, there have been the attacks on arms convoys in Sudan which were on their way to Gaza, and the revelation of a Hizbullah-led arms smuggling network in the spring; 49 operatives, led by Hizbullah member Sami Shihab (Muhammad Yousef Mansour) are now on trial in Egypt for organizing this network.
 
The Egyptians, however, are making no efforts to curb commercial smuggling into Gaza, which now forms a major source of income for the Hamas regime. As a result, Hamas is mixing the bringing in of arms with the import of commercial goods. Part of the levy placed on commercial owners of tunnels is thought to include requiring them at short notice to be ready to bring in arms for Hamas. Extensive redigging of tunnels destroyed in the bombing of the Philadelphi corridor began already in January.
 
In addition to the extensive tunnel network, seaborne smuggling is also continuing. Hamas claims as a result of these efforts to now have a more extensive array of weaponry than before the war.
 
Hamas lost a very large amount of weaponry in the course of Operation Cast Lead. Key storage facilities under mosques and public buildings were discovered. The movement blames the presence of Fatah "informers" for its failures in this regard. Hamas believes that Fatah members at street level provided real-time information to IDF forces. The movement settled accounts with a series of executions of Fatah men after Cast Lead. Improving internal security is now a major task facing the rulers of Gaza.
 
The picture of Hamas in Gaza that emerges in the post-Cast Lead period is a complex one. On the one hand, its rule survived the operation intact. No concerted Israeli effort to bring Hamas down was undertaken, and Hamas swiftly reasserted its authority after emerging from the rubble, despite the heavy blows it had taken.
 
On the other hand, the many failures in the movement's performance have tarnished its reputation and accentuated internal divisions. The most important of these splits is between the movement's traditional leadership which wants to continue its current path, and the growing number of Salafi militants concentrated in the Kassam Brigades, who would like to see greater Islamic observance in society and a return to a collision course with Israel.
 
Operation Cast Lead represented a significant tactical defeat for Hamas and hence, an important though far from decisive setback for the regional alliance which it is part of. The movement has picked up the pieces and engaged in a rethink of the methods that failed it. Of course, Israel too will have sought to learn its lessons from the experience of the Gaza War. As to who drew the better conclusions - this will be answered only in the next round of fighting between these two seemingly irreconcilable foes.
 
The writer is a senior researcher at the Global Research in International Affairs Center, IDC, Herzliya.