Surrendering its honor - Pollard, Israël en de USA

Pollard, Israel en de Verenigde Staten

30.05.2007

 

Er zijn mensen die spreken over Amerika als de 'Zionist Occupied Government' (ZOG), die menen dat Amerika niet zijn eigen belangen behartigt, maar die van Israël, dit alles vanwege de machtige en rijke Joodse lobby.
Veel mensen die dat te ver gaat, menen wel dat de Amerikaanse buitenlandse politiek teveel door Israëls belangen wordt bepaald, en Israël zich meer kan permitteren dan welk ander land dan ook vanwege de onconditionele steun van de VS.


De realiteit is anders. De VS heeft Israël meermaals onder druk gezet, bijvoorbeeld om na de start van de tweede intifada niet op de vele zelfmoordaanslagen te reageren. Het duurde anderhalf jaar voordat Israël door herbezetting van de Westelijke Jordaanoever het aantal aanslagen drastisch kon beperken. De aanslagen op de Twin Towers en de onderschepping van een uit Iran afkomstig illegaal schip met wapens bestemd voor de Palestijnse Autoriteit veranderde de visie van de VS op zowel aanslagen als de betrouwbaarheid van Arafat. Het was de VS die aandrong op deelname van Hamas aan de verkiezingen, wat tegen de Oslo Akkoorden indruiste, waarin expliciet gesteld wordt dat racistische en gewelddadige partijen van de Palestijnse verkiezingen zijn uitgesloten. Dit is logisch, want de Palestijnse Autoriteit is tijdens het Oslo vredesproces gecreëerd om vrede met Israël te sluiten. Hamas heeft altijd gezegd tegen vrede te zijn en beschouwt onderhandelingen als tijdverspilling. De VS drong ook aan op de eenzijdige terugtrekking uit Gaza twee jaar geleden, en weerhoudt Israël de laatste jaren van onderhandelingen met Syrië. Terwijl de VS wapens verkopen aan Egypte en Saoedi-Arabië, heeft ze Israël verboden wapens te verkopen aan China.

Ik wil hier niet betogen dat Israël een veel hardere lijn had verkozen als de VS dit niet hadden verboden, maar dat op zijn minst een deel van deze zaken niet door Washington besloten moeten worden maar door Israël zelf. En dat Israël niet onevenredig veel macht heeft, hooguit onevenredig veel aandacht.

Het laatste voorbeeld zijn de opmerkingen van VS ambassadeur Jones over de Israëlische spion Jonathan Pollard (zie artikel hieronder), die een levenslange gevangenisstraf uitzit in de VS vanwege spionage. De hele zaak Pollard laat een andere kant van de relatie tussen Israël en de VS zien.
(Lees ook The United States Mandate for Palestine.)

Ratna Pelle

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Surrendering its honor

By Yossi Melman - Haaretz - May 25, 2007
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/863016.html

Any self-respecting country would have summoned the U.S. ambassador to the Foreign Ministry and demanded that he clarify his harsh statement that the fact that Jonathan Pollard, an American citizen sentenced to life for spying for Israel, has not been executed should be seen as an act of clemency.

But Israel is a country that has long ago stopped respecting its own sovereignty, given up its independence of thought and subordinated its will to that of Washington. Israel refuses to respond to Syria's offer of negotiations for fear of incurring the wrath of the American administration. It has submitted to the American dictate and established a special unit within the Defense Ministry to monitor security exports, solely because the United States demanded it. And these are only two examples among many in the last few years that indicate the obsequiousness of Israel's political and security leadership before the Washington nobleman.

In light of this, Jerusalem's stammered response to Ambassador Richard Jones' intolerable remark is not surprising. "The fact that he wasn't executed is the mercy that Jonathan Pollard will receive," said the U.S. envoy to Israel. In other words, Pollard, his family and the Israeli government, which controlled his espionage, should be thankful for the "light" sentence he received.

Jonathan Pollard was a civilian intelligence analyst for the U.S. Navy when he sold his country's secrets for money to his handlers in Israel. He betrayed his country. There is no dispute over that. Twenty-one years ago, he was given the heavy sentence of life imprisonment.

The Israeli government does not just have a moral responsibility for the fate of its agent. It also contributed significantly to the fact that he's rotting in prison. It began with the hasty decision of Elyakim Rubinstein - then the political attachי at the Israeli Embassy in Washington and now a Supreme Court justice - to remove Pollard from the embassy grounds, where he was seeking asylum. He could have been brought in, as the Americans held Soviet citizens in their embassy in Moscow when they sought political asylum. One could have argued that according to the Law of Return, he's an Israeli citizen - in addition to which his handlers had already secretly given him an Israeli passport. It could be that Israel would ultimately have been forced to surrender Pollard, but that should have been done in exchange for an assurance that his sentence would be reduced.

Even after Pollard was handed over in such a shameful way and arrested, Israel could still have helped get him a lighter sentence - for instance, by setting it as a condition for Israeli participation in the investigation. Israel unconditionally provided the United States with the thousands of documents it received from him, thereby helping to incriminate him, without receiving anything in exchange. Even later, Israeli leaders and heads of the intelligence community did not really go out of their way to lobby the American government institutions and intelligence agencies for a pardon for Pollard.

The only one who almost achieved this was Benjamin Netanyahu, during his tenure as prime minister. In 1998, during the peace talks held at the Wye Plantation in Maryland, Netanyahu insisted that Pollard be released as part of the deal with the Palestinians. The U.S. president at the time, Bill Clinton, leaned toward agreeing to do so, but the head of the Central Intelligence Agency, George Tenet, brought all his weight to bear against it, threatening to resign, and Clinton backed off.

Pollard is not the only American citizen since 1980 who has been accused of espionage and given an extended sentence, but the others were despicable ones who caused far more damage to the American national interest. For instance, CIA agent Aldrich Aimes' treachery allowed the Soviet Union to discover the identities of agents working for the United States and execute them. But Pollard is the only one to whom the Americans are so hostile.

It could be because Pollard spied for a friendly country, making his act a more stinging affront. Nonetheless, it's difficult to accept or understand the American lust for revenge when it comes to Pollard. There's something irrational about it. Jones' remarks were rude and bereft of diplomatic tact, reflecting this American pathology that aspires to keep Pollard from ever being pardoned. Even though Jones has apologized, he deserves to be denounced. By essentially ignoring his comments, Israel is adding insult to the injury it has already done Pollard.