woensdag 11 november 2009

Facebook telt vriendschappen tussen inwoners van Israel en Palestina

 
Ik wil geen spelbreker zijn, maar ik heb een paar Facebook vrienden waarvan ik geen idee heb wie ze überhaupt zijn...
 
Wouter
_______________________
 
 
Wo, Okt 28, 2009

De sociale netwerksite Facebook telt sinds dinsdag het aantal vriendschappen die afgesloten worden tussen mensen van verschillende landen, verschillende geloofsovertuigingen en verschillende politieke strekkingen. Daarmee wil Facebook vrede promoten.

De cijfertjes die peace.facebook.com toont geven het aantal connecties weer tussen mensen van bijvoorbeeld verschillende landen die de afgelopen 24 uur vrienden zijn geworden op de netwerksite.

Tussen inwoners van Griekenland en Turkije werden er 13.790 nieuwe vriendschappen gesmeed, tussen India en Pakistan 7.339 en tussen Israël en Palestina 5158. Facebook telde ook 71.555 nieuwe vriendschappen tussen moslims en christenen de afgelopen dag en 667 vriendschappen tussen soennieten en sjiieten.

Peace Dot
Het initiatief van Facebook past in de 'Peace Dot'-campagne van de Stanford University. Bedoeling is organisaties te stimuleren een aparte peace-subdomeinnaam te creëren waarop ze hun initiatieven rond vrede verzamelen.

Stanford houdt alle organisaties bij die deelnemen. In de lijst staan ondermeer Sourceforge, een site waarop je opensource software kan downloaden, en CouchSurfing, een site waarop je een slaapplek ter beschikking kan stellen voor andere mensen. (IPS)

 

Turkse parlementsvoorzitter stuurt dankbrief aan Knessetvoorzitter in Tel Aviv

 
Dit kan bijna niet per ongeluk zijn. Misschien moet Israel een brief terugsturen, geadresseerd aan het Turkse parlement in Istanbul?
 
RP
------------
 
A lesson in geography: Turkey official addresses letter to Knesset Speaker in Tel Aviv
 
Last update - 21:51 10/11/2009       
Turkey official addresses letter to Knesset Speaker in Tel Aviv
By Jonathan Lis, Haaretz Correspondent
 
 
The Turkish head of parliament sent Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin a missive on Monday stating that the Israeli legislature was located in Tel Aviv, as opposed to the capital Jerusalem.
 
The letter, addressed to "Reuven Rivlin, Chairman of the Israeli Parliament, Tel Aviv," embarrassed more than a few Knesset officials, with the Knesset Speaker's Office opting not to turn the possible mistake into a diplomatic spat.
 
"Jerusalem's status as the capital of Israel and as the home of the Knesset is well established, and there is no doubt that that is a fact well understood in Ankara," a note of clarification released by the Knesset Speaker's Office said on Tuesday.
 
Despite recent tension between Israel and Turkey, the Knesset Speaker's Office expressed satisfaction over the letter, sent in reply to Rivlin's note of congratulations over the recent election of Mehmet Ali Sahin as the new Turkish Parliament Speaker.
 
"I would like to thank you for the gracious congratulatory letter you sent me on behalf of yourself and the Israeli Knesset for my election into office," Sahin wrote.
 
"I would like to stress that during my term as parliament speaker the bonds of friendship and cooperation will continue between the Grand National Assembly of Turkey and the Israeli parliament," Sahin added, wishing Rivlin "luck in his duties and passing my genuine regards to the honorable members of Israel's parliament."
 
The mishap follows the more recent diplomatic crisis between Israel and Turkey, generated over Turkey's disapproval of Israel's actions in its war against Hamas in Gaza, earlier in the year.
 
Last month Turkey canceled a NATO air force drill in which Israeli pilots were set to participate in protest of Israel's invasion of Gaza, with tensions further deepening after Turkey's state-run TV aired a drama series that portrayed Israeli soldiers killing a Palestinian girl.
 

Extremistische rabbi in Yitzhar nederzetting praat moord op niet-joden en kinderen goed

 
Hopelijk wordt dit boek snel verboden in Israel. Babies en kinderen vormen natuurlijk nooit "een bedreiging voor de natie", hooguit hun indoctrinatie waardoor ze later bij 'het gewapende verzet' gaan, en daartegen kan Israel in onderhandelingen maatregelen eisen en militair optreden. Oproepen als van deze rabbi zullen het internationale begrip voor Israels optreden bepaald niet vergroten, en zijn gefundenes fressen voor Israels vijanden en antisemieten. Gelukkig deelt maar een kleine minderheid in Israel de ideeën van deze rabbi, maar dat is al erg genoeg. Israel moet hard optreden tegen dergelijk extremisme, dat niet alleen een bedreiging is voor de Arabieren maar vooral ook voor zichzelf.
 
RP
----------------
 
Last update - 10:18 09/11/2009       
West Bank rabbi: Jews can kill Gentiles who threaten Israel
By Haaretz Service
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1126890.html
 
 
Just weeks after the arrest of alleged Jewish terrorist, Yaakov Teitel, a West Bank rabbi on Monday released a book giving Jews permission to kill Gentiles who threaten Israel.
 
Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro, who heads the Od Yosef Chai Yeshiva in the Yitzhar settlement, wrote in his book "The King's Torah" that even babies and children can be killed if they pose a threat to the nation.
 
Shapiro based the majority of his teachings on passages quoted from the Bible, to which he adds his opinions and beliefs.
 
"It is permissable to kill the Righteous among Nations even if they are not responsible for the threatening situation," he wrote, adding: "If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments - because we care about the commandments - there is nothing wrong with the murder."
 
Several prominent rabbis, including Rabbi Yithak Ginzburg and Rabbi Yaakov Yosef, have recommended the book to their students and followers.
 

Actiegroep van Israeli's in Nederland protesteert tegen bezoek Lieberman


Het is vreemd dat de mensen die het hardst roepen om erkenning van en praten met Hamas, zo'n moeite hebben met Liebermans bezoek aan Nederland. Als reden om met Hamas te praten voert men aan dat hij gekozen is, wat voor Lieberman toch ook geldt zou je denken. Voor praten met Hamas voert men aan dat je niet met je vrienden maar met je vijanden vrede sluit, en dat Hamas nou eenmaal een belangrijk onderdeel is van de Palestijnse maatschappij. Allemaal zaken die voor Lieberman ook gelden, met dit verschil, dat Liebermans partij bij lange na geen meerderheid haalde bij de laatste verkiezingen, en Lieberman zich sinds hij in de regering zit, heeft uitgesproken voor onderhandelingen met de Palestijnen op basis van de Routekaart voor de Vrede. Lieberman komt naar Nederland op grond van zijn functie als minister van buitenlandse zaken, niet als leider van de Yisrael Beiteinu partij. De regering heeft zich voor een tweestatenoplossing en het vredesproces uitgesproken.

RP
--------------

Israeli expats protest Lieberman visit to Holland
By Cnaan Liphshiz
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1127032.html

 
The scheduled arrival of Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman in the Netherlands Wednesday has touched off a rare display of discord between the local Jewish community and some Israelis living there. Holland has one of the largest Israeli communities in Europe.

A few dozen Dutch ex-Israelis from a group that says it is "critical of Israel" plan to confront Lieberman and his hosts from Holland's largest Zionist group, the Center for Information and Documentation on Israel.

They intend to picket outside Amsterdam's Golden Tulip Apollo Hotel, where Lieberman is slated to address dozens of CIDI members, citing his "racist motives" and "hate-mongering." Lieberman says his controversial policies on Israeli Arabs, which include support for a mandatory pledge of allegiance, are not racist.

The protest by gate48 is directed against CIDI's hospitality and the "uncritical" manner in which he will be received by the Dutch government, board member Erella Grassiani says.

In response CIDI founder Ronny Naftaniel noted that Lieberman was democratically elected, adding that instead of protesting, "we would wish that gate48 members would exercise their democratic rights in Israel itself." Naftaniel also said that hosting Lieberman does not constitute agreement with his policies or viewpoints.
 

dinsdag 10 november 2009

Franse minister BuZa Kouchner vraagt zich af of Israeli's nog vrede willen

 
Als Frankrijk de relaties met Israel wil verbeteren:
 
believing Paris would never be a credible partner in Middle East peace talks if it was seen as biased in favour of the Arab world.
 
...dan moet Sarkozy eens een hartig woordje met Kouchner gaan spreken. Hij had natuurlijk zijn twijfel kunnen uiten over de vredeswil aan beide kanten, want de Palestijnse vredesbeweging is ook niet echt om naar huis te schrijven.
 
Blijkbaar wordt van Israel verwacht dat het zich actief blijft inzetten voor vrede, zowel op straat als op diplomatiek en politiek niveau, terwijl de Palestijnen niks hoeven te doen. Een evenwichtige houding houdt in dat je naar beide partijen kritisch bent en eisen stelt, dus de eis voor een bevriezing van de nederzettingenbouw gaat gepaard met de eis aan de Palestijnen de opruiing in de media en de verering van 'martelaren' (plegers van aanslagen) te stoppen, Joodse nationale rechten in het land en in Jeruzalem te erkennen of het recht op terugkeer op te geven. Het is duidelijk dat er van een dergelijke benadering van Frankrijk geen sprake is.
 
RP
------------------
 
Last update - 16:06 10/11/2009
French FM: It seems Israel no longer wants peace
By Reuters
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1127198.html
 
 
France fears that Israel no longer desires a Middle East peace deal, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said on Tuesday, adding that Paris remained deeply opposed to settlement building in the West Bank.
 
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held unusually low-profile talks with U.S. President Barack Obama on Monday and is due to meet French President Nicolas Sarkozy on Wednesday.
 
Speaking on France Inter radio, Kouchner made clear he was not expecting any swift break through in Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations.
 
"What really hurts me, and this shocks us, is that before there used to be a great peace movement in Israel. There was a left that made itself heard and a real desire for peace," Kouchner said.
 
"It seems to me, and I hope that I am completely wrong, that this desire has completely vanished, as though people no longer believe in it," he added.
 
When Sarkozy took office in 2007 he worked hard to improve sometimes frosty French relations with Israel, believing Paris would never be a credible partner in Middle East peace talks if it was seen as biased in favour of the Arab world.
 
However, relations with the Netanyahu government have not been easy and France has been especially vocal in demanding that Israel halt Jewish settlement construction in the West Bank.
 
Obama recently eased U.S. pressure on Israel over the settlements, calling for restraint in construction where he had earlier pushed for a freeze. But Kouchner signalled no such softening of French opposition.
 
"There is a real difference of opinion on this [between Sarkozy and Netanyahu]," he added.
 
Underlining their sometimes problematic ties, Kouchner belatedly cancelled a trip to Israel and the Palestinian territories last month. No official reason was given, but one French diplomat said Israel was making access to Gaza difficult.
 
Kouchner confirmed on Tuesday that he would now visit the region "in the coming days" and said he would use the trip to try to persuade Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to run for re-election in a ballot slated for January.
 
Abbas announced last week he would not seek a new mandate. France fears the younger generation of Palestinian politicians will be less committed to seeking a peace accord.
 
"We must revisit this with Mahmoud Abbas," Kouchner said.
 
Two days after Netanyahu's visit, Syrian President Bashar Assad will also be in Paris for talks with Sarkozy.
 
French officials have said the two meetings are not linked, seeking to kill off any speculation that France might try to act as middleman between the two nations.
 

Thomas Friedman over de eindeloze herhalingen van de vredesproces film

 
Misschien wat kort door de bocht, maar zéér herkenbaar:
 
  The Palestinian leadership "wants a deal with Israel without any negotiations" and Israel's leadership "wants negotiations with the Palestinians without any deal."
 
Thomas Friedman stelt voor dat de regering Obama zich concentreert op de eigen Amerikaanse problemen, en als Israël en de Palestijnen het zwaar genoeg krijgen om weer serieus over vrede te gaan onderhandelen, dan bellen ze maar...
 
De moedeloosheid van deze scherpe commentator is begrijpelijk, maar de VS zijn zelf ook medeverantwoordelijk voor de patstelling; ze zijn geen passieve toeschouwer van deze slechte B-film, maar eerder één van de hoofdrolspelers. Beide partijen krijgen een grote zak met geld uit Amerika, waarmee de VS veel invloed kan uitoefenen als het wil. Zelfs voor de machtovername van Hamas in Gaza draagt Amerika medeverantwoordelijkheid, omdat het erop aandrong dat Hamas aan de vorige verkiezingen mee kon doen, een desastreuze misrekening.
 
Lees ook Ami Isseroff's commentaar op MidEast Web: The end of the peace process movie?
 
Wouter, met dank aan Ratna
__________________________________

November 8, 2009
Op-Ed Columnist
Call White House, Ask for Barack
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
 
 
The Israeli-Palestinian peace process has become a bad play. It is obvious that all the parties are just acting out the same old scenes, with the same old tired clichés — and that no one believes any of it anymore. There is no romance, no sex, no excitement, no urgency — not even a sense of importance anymore. The only thing driving the peace process today is inertia and diplomatic habit. Yes, the Israeli-Palestinian peace process has left the realm of diplomacy. It is now more of a calisthenic, like weight-lifting or sit-ups, something diplomats do to stay in shape, but not because they believe anything is going to happen. And yet, as much as we, the audience, know this to be true, we can never quite abandon hope for peace in the Holy Land. It is our habit. Indeed, as I ranted about this to a Jordanian friend the other day, he said it all reminded him of an old story.
 
"These two guys are watching a cowboy and Indian movie. And in the opening scene, an Indian is hiding behind a rock about to ambush the handsome cowboy," he explained. " 'I bet that Indian is going to kill that cowboy,' one guy says to the other. 'Never happen,' his friend answers. 'The cowboy is not going to be killed in the opening scene.' 'I'll bet you $10 he gets killed,' the guy says. 'I'll take that bet,' says his friend.
 
"Sure enough, a few minutes later, the cowboy is killed and the friend pays the $10. After the movie is over the guy says to his friend, 'Look, I have to give you back your $10. I'd actually seen this movie before. I knew what was going to happen.' His friend answers: 'No, you can keep the $10. I'd seen the movie, too. I just thought it would end differently this time.' "
 
This peace process movie is not going to end differently just because we keep playing the same reel. It is time for a radically new approach. And I mean radical. I mean something no U.S. administration has ever dared to do: Take down our "Peace-Processing-Is-Us" sign and just go home.
 
Right now we want it more than the parties. They all have other priorities today. And by constantly injecting ourselves we've become their Novocain. We relieve all the political pain from the Arab and Israeli decision-makers by creating the impression in the minds of their publics that something serious is happening. "Look, the U.S. secretary of state is here. Look, she's standing by my side. Look, I'm doing something important! Take our picture. Put it on the news. We're on the verge of something really big and I am indispensable to it." This enables the respective leaders to continue with their real priorities — which are all about holding power or pursuing ideological obsessions — while pretending to advance peace, without paying any political price.
 
Let's just get out of the picture. Let all these leaders stand in front of their own people and tell them the truth: "My fellow citizens: Nothing is happening; nothing is going to happen. It's just you and me and the problem we own."
 
Indeed, it's time for us to dust off James Baker's line: "When you're serious, give us a call: 202-456-1414. Ask for Barack. Otherwise, stay out of our lives. We have our own country to fix."
 
The fact is, the only time America has been able to advance peace — post-Yom Kippur War, Camp David, post-Lebanon war, Madrid and Oslo — has been when the parties felt enough pain for different reasons that they invited our diplomacy, and we had statesmen — Henry Kissinger, Jimmy Carter, George Shultz, James Baker and Bill Clinton — savvy enough to seize those moments.
 
Today, the Arabs, Israel and the Palestinians are clearly not feeling enough pain to do anything hard for peace with each other — a mood best summed up by a phrase making the rounds at the State Department: The Palestinian leadership "wants a deal with Israel without any negotiations" and Israel's leadership "wants negotiations with the Palestinians without any deal."
 
It is obvious that this Israeli government believes it can have peace with the Palestinians and keep the West Bank, this Palestinian Authority still can't decide whether to reconcile with the Jewish state or criminalize it and this Hamas leadership would rather let Palestinians live forever in the hellish squalor that is Gaza than give up its crazy fantasy of an Islamic Republic in Palestine.
 
If we are still begging Israel to stop building settlements, which is so manifestly idiotic, and the Palestinians to come to negotiations, which is so manifestly in their interest, and the Saudis to just give Israel a wink, which is so manifestly pathetic, we are in the wrong place. It's time to call a halt to this dysfunctional "peace process," which is only damaging the Obama team's credibility.
 
If the status quo is this tolerable for the parties, then I say, let them enjoy it. I just don't want to subsidize it or anesthetize it anymore. We need to fix America. If and when they get serious, they'll find us. And when they do, we should put a detailed U.S. plan for a two-state solution, with borders, on the table. Let's fight about something big.

President Assad van Syrië wil 'zionistische bezetting' elimineren

 
President Assad vergeet voor het gemak dat een deel van de Golan bij het mandaatgebied Palestina hoorde tot 1923, en dat Syrië een smalle strook zelf illegaal veroverde in 1948. Hij verzwijgt ook dat Syrië vanuit de Golan voortdurend de lager gelegen Kibboetsen en andere Israëlische plaatsen beschoot. Hij moet eerst maar eens laten zien dat Syrië nu te vertrouwen is, en Israël ook daadwerkelijk vrede zal krijgen in ruil voor de Golan.
 
The Syrian president went on to say that the real cause of the problem in the region was "the Zionist occupation" which "we must begin to work to eliminate."
 
Het blijft lekker vaag wat hij precies bedoelt met de 'zionistische bezetting'. Als hij de in 1967 bezette gebieden bedoelt, dan is zijn opmerking absurd, want er was daarvoor zeker ook al een probleem in de regio. Als hij Israël zelf bedoelt, is dat veelzeggend en laat het zien dat er nog weinig veranderd is sinds 1967.
 
Assad cited the world's "negative" response to the Goldstone Commission's report, as well as its "indifferent reaction" to what he termed "one of the worst war crimes ever known in modern times" - apparently referring to Israel's three-week offensive in Gaza - as reasons for the Arab and Islamic world to be more self-sufficient.
 
Laten we voor het gemak even vergeten dat Syrië hele dorpen heeft uitgemoord omdat de bevolking opstandig tegen het regime was, en ook in Libanon de nodige bloedbaden heeft aangericht, mede onder Palestijnen. Laten we de dagelijkse vernederingen van dissidenten en (religieuze) minderheden ook even vergeten, net als de totale angst waarin mensen die openlijk het regime bekritiseren verkeren. Misschien is Syrië niet helemaal het aangewezen land om Israël de les te lezen wat betreft vermeende oorlogsmisdaden.
 
RP
---------------

JPost  - The Jerusalem Post
Nov 9, 2009 15:20 | Updated Nov 9, 2009 17:47
Assad: Resistance to the occupation is a national duty
By JPOST.COM STAFF
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1257770021197&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


Syrian President Bashar Assad continued to sway from peace overtures to threats of war on Monday, stressing that resistance might be used to "return" the Golan Heights.

"Resisting occupation is a patriotic duty and to support it is a moral and legal imperative…and an honor of which we are proud," said Assad in a speech to the 25th Economic Summit of the Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (COMCEC) in Istanbul.

"This does not contradict our unceasing desire to achieve a just and comprehensive peace on the basis of the return of the occupied territories, especially the occupied Syrian Golan, but the failure of negotiations to restore all our rights would make resistance an alternative solution," he said, in an apparent allusion to acts of violence and terror against Israel committed by "resistance" movements such as Hizbullah.

Concerning the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, Assad said that stopping settlement construction was not an end in itself, but a means to an end.

"What about dismantling settlements instead of stopping construction, and most importantly, what about ending the occupation?" he said.

The Syrian president went on to say that the real cause of the problem in the region was "the Zionist occupation" which "we must begin to work to eliminate."

Assad cited the world's "negative" response to the Goldstone Commission's report, as well as its "indifferent reaction" to what he termed "one of the worst war crimes ever known in modern times" - apparently referring to Israel's three-week offensive in Gaza - as reasons for the Arab and Islamic world to be more self-sufficient.

"Internationally banned weapons are being used against [Gazan] civilians, showing Israel's barbarianism," said the Syrian president. "[The world's reaction] proves that none of our goals will be achieved by relying on others."

At the end of October, Assad said that Damascus was ready to resume peace talks with Jerusalem, stressing that the people of his country would support negotiations.

"As far as it concerns us in Syria, we have national support to continue talks with Israel," Assad said in Zagreb after meeting Croatian President Stipe Mesic. "However, there is a condition that on the Israeli side we also have those who want to continue the negotiations."

maandag 9 november 2009

De dreiging van het uitroepen van een Palestijnse staat


Een eenzijdige Israelische terugtrekking, waarna de Palestijnen in het betreffende gebied eenzijdig een staat uitroepen, zou kunnen werken, maar wanneer de Palestijnen binnen de 1967 grenzen een staat uitroepen zonder Israels goedkeuring is er een probleem, vooral wanneer een aantal landen deze staat zou erkennen. Door nu al te zeggen zo'n staat te zullen erkennen, torpederen deze landen de onderhandelingen en beinvloeden zij de uitkomst. Immers, de Palestijnen zullen geen enkele concessie doen in Jeruzalem als ze weten dat hun staat, die zij uiteraard ook in geheel Oost-Jeruzalem inclusief de Tempelberg en de oude stad uitroepen, op internationale erkenning kan rekenen. Dan kun je net zo goed gelijk Israel een dictaat opleggen waarin het maximaal twee jaar de tijd krijgt om eenzijdig alle nederzettingen te ontruimen en zich geheel terug te trekken. Net als voor 1967 zullen de Joden niet meer naar de Klaagmuur kunnen en Joodse heilige plaatsen op de Westoever worden waarschijnlijk verwoest. Of Israel het recht krijgt zich tegen vanuit Qalqiliya of Tulkarem afgeschoten raketten op Tel Aviv te verdedigen, is zeer de vraag.
Moet er dan geen Palestijnse staat komen? Jawel, maar wel met stevige veiligheidsgaranties en concessies van Palestijnse kant die alleen te verkrijgen zijn met internationale druk, niet met internationaal knuffelen van de Palestijnen.
 
RP
-----------

PM heads to U.S. under threat of Palestinian statehood declaration
By Barak Ravid and Natasha Mozgovaya
Haaretz  / Last update - 12:43 08/11/2009
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1126594.html

 
Concerns are growing in Israel's government over the possibility of a unilateral Palestinian declaration of independence within the 1967 borders, a move which could potentially be recognized by the United Nations Security Council.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently asked the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama to veto any such proposal, after reports reached Jerusalem of support for such a declaration from major European Union countries, and apparently also certain U.S. officials.

The reports indicated that Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad has reached a secret understanding with the Obama administration over U.S. recognition of an independent Palestinian state. Such recognition would likely transform any Israeli presence across the Green Line, even in Jerusalem, into an illegal incursion to which the Palestinians would be entitled to engage in measures of self-defense.

In late August Fayyad presented the international community with a detailed plan for building up Palestinian Authority institutions and set a timetable of up to two years for its implementation. Senior Israeli officials said Fayyad's plan initially met with positive reaction in Jerusalem for its emphasis on institution-building and making security services more efficient.

But some Israeli officials told Haaretz that alongside the clauses reported in the media - which are similar to elements of Netanyahu's call for "economic peace" between Israel and the Palestinians - Fayyad's plan also contains a classified, unreleased portion stipulating a unilateral declaration of independence.

The plan specifies that at the end of a designated period for bolstering national institutions the PA, in conjunction with the Arab League, would file a "claim of sovereignty" to the UN Security Council and General Assembly over the borders of June 4, 1967 (before the outbreak of the Six-Day War, during which Israel took control of the West Bank and Gaza).

Fayyad is also seeking a new Security Council resolution to replace Resolutions 242 and 338 in the hope of winning the international community's support for the borders of a Palestinian state and applying stronger pressure on Israel to withdraw from the West Bank.

Several Israeli officials told Haaretz that Fayyad had spoken to them of positive responses he had received over the plan from prominent EU member states, including the United Kingdom, France, Spain and Sweden. Fayyad added that he presented the proposal to the U.S. administration and did not receive any signal of opposition in response.

Netanyahu's "kitchen cabinet" has held a number of meetings on the matter in recent months. "It's a very dangerous move," said a senior Israeli foreign-policy official. "More and more cabinet ministers understand that diplomatic inaction on Israel's part is likely to bring international support for the Fayyad program."

Israeli sources said Netanyahu discussed the proposal in meetings with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and special Mideast envoy George Mitchell and requested that the U.S. tell Fayyad that it would not support his proposal and would veto it in the Security Council. Netanyahu has yet to receive a clear response from Washington on its stance on Fayyad's plan.

Netanyahu is to arrive in Washington today for a brief visit. He is scheduled to address the United Jewish Communities General Assembly, preceded by Defense Minister Ehud Barak.

On Tuesday Netanyahu is to fly to Paris, where he is scheduled to meet with President Nicolas Sarkozy on Wednesday. The prime minister's Paris visit comes just two days before that of Syrian President Bashar Assad, who will also meet with Sarkozy. Netanyahu has not signaled interest in renewing negotiations with Damascus, but stagnation in talks with the Palestinians may force him to do so.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, a mediator between Israel and Syria during Ehud Olmert's term as prime minister, said Friday in Paris that Turkey seeks to resume its role as an intermediary between the two countries, and that his government can be an "honest broker" in such talks.

Netanyahu has expressed reluctance over Turkish mediation due to ongoing diplomatic tension between Ankara and Jerusalem.

'Nederzettingen even erg als zelfmoordaanslagen', volgens Fatah-leider Dahlan


"What is the difference between blowing up a bus in Tel Aviv and taking over Palestinian land?" Dahlan asked.
 
De doden zijn niet meer tot leven te wekken, maar een nederzetting kan weer worden ontruimd. Een nederzetting is bovendien niet per definitie schadelijk voor de Palestijnen; dit hangt sterk af van waar hij wordt gebouwd en of land van Palestijnen is geconfisceerd. Veel land op de Westoever is ongebruikt en ligt niet in de weg van (mogelijke) uitbreidingsplannen van Palestijnse steden. Het hangt daarnaast ook af van de mensen die in de nederzetting gaan wonen: zijn dit fanatieke religieuze kolonisten of mensen met gematigde ideeën die graag met hun Palestijnse buren willen samenwerken? Dus terwijl een zelfmoordaanslag per definitie een drama is en onvoorstelbaar leed voor de slachtoffers en hun nabestaanden en vrienden inhoudt, ligt dat bij een nederzetting heel anders. Ook zaaien zelfmoordaanslagen angst en paniek en terreur bij de bevolking, en leiden ze ertoe dat mensen niet meer normaal de straat op durven.
De Palestijnen hebben ontegenzeggelijk te lijden onder het conflict, met name onder de maatregelen die Israel neemt om aanslagen en ander Palestijns geweld te voorkomen. Geweld dat er al was lang voor de bezetting.
 
The Fatah man also warned that riots in Jerusalem will not subside as long as Israel's prime minister "keeps sending settlers to pray at Al-Aqsa Mosque."
 
Deze 'kolonisten' zijn Joden wiens heiligste plaatsen op de Tempelberg liggen - daar waar de moslims de Rotskoepel en Al Aqsa Moskee hebben gebouwd. Je zou met net zoveel recht kunnen zeggen dat de Arabieren daar de kolonisten zijn.
 
Dergelijke opruiiende taal van het 'gematigde' Fatahleiderschap brengt de vrede in elk geval niet dichterbij.
  
RP
-----------------

'Settlement activity comparable to bus bombings in Tel Aviv'
By Haaretz Service
Last update - 16:33 11/10/2009
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1120210.html

 
Fatah strongman Mohammed Dahlan on Sunday compared Palestinian suicide bombings to Israel's establishment of settlements on Palestinian land, Israel Radio reported.

"What is the difference between blowing up a bus in Tel Aviv and taking over Palestinian land?" Dahlan asked.

Dahlan warned against a "loss of control" on the Palestinian street, in light of recent clashes between Israeli police and Palestinian rioters in Jerusalem, but added that the Palestinians were not interested in a protracted conflict with Israel.

The Fatah man also warned that riots in Jerusalem will not subside as long as Israel's prime minister "keeps sending settlers to pray at Al-Aqsa Mosque."

Meanwhile Sunday, Israel lifted the restrictions it had imposed on entry to Jerusalem's Temple Mount, following a period of heightened tensions at the holy site, which houses the Jewish Western Wall and the Muslim Al-Aqsa Mosque.

In light of sporadic clashes between Palestinians and Israeli police in the area, and calls by Palestinians and Israeli Arabs to "protect the Al-Aqsa Mosque" in recent days, Israel restricted the entry of Muslim men under the age of 50, and prohibited Jews from entering the mosque compound altogether.

On Saturday, the Palestinian news agency Ma'an reported that Israel had agreed to allow some 400 Muslims, who barricaded themselves inside the Al-Aqsa Mosque during the recent riots, to leave the compound without being arrested.

The compromise between Israel and the Palestinians was brokered by Jordan's ambassador to Israel, the news agency reported.

The Fatah official in the West Bank charged with Jerusalem affairs, Khatem Abed al-Kadr, said that Israeli authorities had provided guarantees that the Palestinians would not be arrested. However, "the danger to the Al-Aqsa Mosque has not passed," he said, calling on Israel's Arabs and the residents of East Jerusalem to maintain a constant presence at the mosque.

On Friday, stone-throwing Arab rioters wounded eleven Border Policemen in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Ra'as al-Amud, as tensions in the capital flared yet again.

Four of the policemen were taken to hospital for treatment and the others were treated at the scene. Officers arrested two Palestinians for hurling stones.

On Thursday, Hamas declared a "day of rage" and called on its supporters to come out and demonstrate at the Al-Aqsa Mosque on Friday.

Leading religious figures in the Muslim world, such as Sheikh Yousuf al-Qaradawi, dubbed Friday "protect Al-Aqsa day." Joining the call to "protect" the mosque were Palestinian politicians and religious figures, who have been trying to convince the lethargic public in Gaza to come out and demonstrate.
 
 

Hezbollah bewapent zich voor nieuwe oorlog tegen Israël


Wat onderstaand artikel niet meldt, is dat de bewapening van Hezbollah in strijd is met diverse VN resoluties en akkoorden, waaronder resolutie 1701 die het staakt het vuren tussen Israel en Hezbollah regelt en het mandaat aan UNIFIL, de internationale vredesmacht, verschaft.
 
RP
------------

Hezbollah gears up for new war
Fighters rearm and reinforce positions in valleys amid fears that Israel is about to launch attack on Islamic group
 
Mitchell Prothero and Peter Beaumont
The Observer, Sunday 8 November 2009
www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/08/hezbollah-rearms-against-israel

 
Hezbollah is rapidly rearming in preparation for a new conflict with Israel, fearing that Benjamin Netanyahu's government will attack Lebanon again prior to any assault on Iran's nuclear facilities.

Last week, Israeli commandos seized a ship in the Mediterranean loaded with almost 400 tonnes of rockets and small arms - which Israel claimed was being sent from Iran to its Hezbollah allies. In dramatic further evidence of growing tensions, the Observer has learned that Hezbollah fighters have been busy reinforcing fixed defence positions north of the Litani river.

Having lost many of its bunkers in the south, Hezbollah is preparing a new strategy to defend villages there.

Although the organisation denied last week that the weapons were intended for its use, senior commanders have done little to disguise the scale of rearmament. "Sure, we are rearming, we have even said that we have far more rockets and missiles than we did in 2006," said a Hezbollah commander, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The 2006 war between Hezbollah and Israel began after an ill-advised operation by to kidnap two Israeli soldiers, prompting a massive Israeli response that lasted 34 days and killed more than 1,000 people.

"We had to blow up or leave some of our bunkers and fighting positions, but we still have plenty of capabilities in the south. We expect the Israelis to come soon, if not this winter, then they will wait until spring, when the ground isn't too soft for their tanks."

It was expected that the ceasefire would neutralise Hezbollah military efforts along the Lebanon-Israel border, as a newly bolstered United Nations peacekeeping force and the Lebanese army took up positions. Instead, based on dozens of interviews and multiple trips into the country's south, it is clear that Hezbollah believes it would face different challenges.

It has been forced to abandon the line of deeply entrenched static positions on the border with Israel and withdraw most of its men and weaponry to clusters of Shia villages.

"It's clear that Hezbollah no longer controls the border, due to the presence of Unifil [United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon] troops," said Andrew Exum, a military expert on Hezbollah at the Centre for New American Security. "They appear to be hardening the villages for this next round of fighting, while pushing their fixed positions north away from Unifil to protect the approaches to Beirut and the Bekaa Valley."

Israel and the United States have long assumed that any military action against Iran's nuclear programme would draw a muscular response from its close allies in Hezbollah. According to Israeli military and intelligence analysts, any move against Iran would require a move first against Hezbollah's capability to disrupt life in northern Israel with its rockets.

Tel Aviv seems unlikely to commit the same mistakes it did in 2006, when the plan was for air strikes to disrupt and confuse Hezbollah's military command, while minimising the use of ground troops. Israeli military sources have said that they are preparing for a potential new conflict.

Cruising through the serene green wadis that connect south Lebanon to the Litani river to the north, the commander explains what happened at the end of the last war. "We knocked out three of their tanks on the first day, as they tried to enter," he explained at a turn-off by the village of al-Qantara. "But after they entered the wadi, we knew they were going for the river and had to be stopped. So we called out to all the special forces anti-tank teams in the area. And they all swarmed the wadi. Boys would set up and wait for the tanks, fire off their rounds and then pull back. Then they would pull back a kilometre or so down the wadi and wait for them again."

According to Israeli military reports, after the first and last tanks were hit by rocket fire or mines, killing the company commander, the 24 tanks were essentially trapped inside a valley, surrounded on all sides and pinned down by mortars, rockets and mines. Eleven tanks were destroyed and the rest partially damaged and Israel lost at least 12 soldiers.

As unlikely as the Israelis might be to repeat these mistakes, they must figure out how to get their heavy armour past the Hezbollah teams that still lurk in the hills and valleys in the next round of fighting, if and when it comes.

 

Israelische Arabieren studeren aan Jordaanse universiteiten vanwege leeftijdsgrens in Israel

 
Vreemd genoeg legt onderstaand artikel nergens uit waarom die minimumleeftijd er is, en waarom juist Arabieren er zoveel hinder van ondervinden en ertegen protesteren. Het beste zou zijn wanneer Arabieren ook in het leger zouden dienen of anders een sociaal dienstjaar vervullen, maar daartegen wordt vanuit het Israelisch-Arabische leiderschap juist fel actie gevoerd omdat het de integratie zou bevorderen en hun eigen Arabische identiteit zou bedreigen.
 
RP
---------------

Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA:  Israeli universities apply an entrance age requirement so that those who don't serve in the army or do national service aren't rewarded with being able to attend university while others are in national service.  It still doesn't level the playing field since they can spend this time studying and retaking the Israeli matriculation and "psychometric" (an equivalent of the American SAT) tests to improve their scores [entrance to almost all programs at Israeli universities are based purely on these scores] while those serving the country find themselves taking or re-taking these critical tests after not having been in a classroom for years. This while the testing schedule for the matriculation exams [which in some cases is only once a year with the results available too late for application for the academic year] can mean losing another year after completion of national service .
______________________________________________________

Increasing numbers of Israeli Arabs studying at Jordanian universities
By Ofri Ilani  Haaretz
Last update - 04:40 01/11/2009
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1124913.html
 
 
Increasing numbers of Israeli Arab high school graduates are leaving the country to study at Jordanian universities, according to a recent survey. A decade ago fewer than 100 Arab Israelis were studying at Jordanian institutions of higher learning, but last year this swelled to about 5,000.

According to the study, sponsored by Dirsat: The Arab Center for Law and Policy, a major reason for the phenomenon is age requirements in many departments at Israeli universities, as well as the language barrier.

hen Maria Shalash of the largely Arab city of Nazareth graduated from high school two years ago, she wanted to study occupational therapy and communication disorders. "The field interested me, and people also told me that there were jobs [in the field]," she said.

Shalash tried to gain a place at the University of Haifa and was invited for an interview. But the university later discovered she was under 20, which disqualified her. She is now studying law, where there is no minimum-age requirement.

De facto discrimination

Shalash is not alone. Thousands of young high school graduates who want to study nursing or occupational or physical therapy have to wait until their 20th birthdays because of limitations by universities. Organizations representing the Arab community are seeking to change the situation, saying that it constitutes de facto discrimination against Israeli Arabs.

Though similar age requirements are not generally imposed by universities abroad, Israeli universities say the policy is necessary to ensure that students are emotionally mature. On the other hand, the Israel Defense Forces allows recruits, most of whom are Jewish, to defer their military service and enter university at age 18.

In recent years, Israel Arab civil rights organizations have sought to fight the universities' minimum-age requirements. "This discrimination actually harms [students seeking to study] in the fields that are most needed by the Arab public," said Dirsat director Yusuf Jabarin. "Even if it was originally not designed to harm Arab students, it is appropriate to consider abolishing [the restrictions]."

A lawsuit filed by the Nazareth-based Karameh human rights organization seeking to abolish the age provisions is currently pending in Tel Aviv District Court.

"I finished high school with good grades and I wanted to do paramedical studies," said Fadel Sa'adi, who hails from an Arab village in the north. "Ultimately I decided to study nursing, but I couldn't because I wasn't 20. I didn't have anything to do so I worked in construction."

A spokesman for the University of Haifa declined to comment on the matter because it was the subject of legal proceedings. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev said that age is a "criterion that is a predictor of success relating to the need to deal with practical experiences." He said that "the university has an interest in maximizing the success rate [of its students]."

The university noted that there are other areas such as the granting of firearms licenses or a bus or taxi driver's license where the applicant needs to be over 18. Regarding the army's program that allows 18-year-olds to enter university, a spokesman said that "the university fulfills the dictates of the Israel Defense Forces ... on the understanding that it involves an important national need."

Ban Ki-Moon wil Goldstone rapport zo snel mogelijk naar Veiligheidsraad sturen

 
Het is goed dat Nederland tegen de resolutie stemde, want het Goldstone rapport draagt niet bij aan vrede en is het zoveelste bewijs voor Israel dat zij geen recht hoeft te verwachten van de VN.
 
RP
----------------
 
 
Ban to send Goldstone to UNSC 'ASAP'
Nov. 8, 2009
E.B. SOLOMONT and tovah lazaroff , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
NEW YORK - Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said on Friday he will send the Goldstone Report, which calls for Israel and the Palestinians to investigate alleged war crimes during Operation Cast Lead in Gaza to the UN Security Council "as soon as possible."

The 15 council members have already received copies of the 575-page report, by the panel chaired by South African Judge Richard Goldstone. The General Assembly, in a resolution adopted Thursday, asked the secretary-general to transmit it, which will make the report an official Security Council document.

It's possible the Goldstone Report could come before the Security Council on Wednesday, during its open debate on the protection of civilians in armed conflict.

Following a two-day debate in the UN General Assembly, 114 countries voted for the resolution and 18 voted against it, including Israel, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, Canada, Australia and several Eastern European nations. Another 44 abstained, including most of the EU countries that had sought unsuccessfully to soften the resolution's language prior to the vote.

Switzerland was the only European country to endorse the report. Russia, which does not often side with Israel in these matters, abstained.

In anticipation of defeat on Thursday, Israel had focused its energies on a "moral victory" and had called on democratic and Western countries to reject the report, which it said undermined the right of moderate countries to defend themselves against terrorism.

"We are satisfied that 18 countries, which constitute a moral majority, supported Israel's stance and that 44 abstained and did not vote with the automatic majority," Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman told the media on Friday.

"It's not a trivial thing that 18 countries, including those from the Western, democratic world, would vote against the resolution," he said.

"The automatic majority of countries like Saudi Arabia and Somalia at the UN is, unfortunately, a given situation. These are not countries which will teach us about morals. Once again it has been proven that the UN is not an arena we can fight in," Lieberman said.

"The results of the vote, and the large number of countries who voted against or abstained, clearly show that the assembly's resolution does not enjoy the support of the moral majority," the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem said, in a statement after the vote. The statement stressed that the resolution had no connection to "the reality Israel faces."

"During Operation Cast Lead the IDF exhibited higher standards of combat and morals than those held by the all the initiators of the resolution," the statement continued. "Israel will continue to act to defend itself from international terrorism, as any democratic country would."

Palestinians are pushing the Security Council to refer the report to the International Criminal Court at The Hague in hopes that it would then prosecute individual Israelis of war crimes.

The Security Council, however, is highly unlikely to take any action. The United States, which has veto power on the council, has repeatedly said the report belonged in the Geneva-based Human Rights Council, which appointed the Goldstone panel.

Diplomats said Russia, which also has veto power on the council, does not want the Security Council dealing with human rights issues.

State Department spokesman Ian Kelly told reporters in Washington on Friday, "We don't support raising this issue in the Security Council. We are committed to the resumption of talks between the two sides, and we do not want to take any steps that would, in any way, jeopardize the resumption of those talks. We also believe that these kinds of issues are best raised and best dealt with through domestic institutions. And we call on Israel to set up the kind of mechanisms to investigate these - some of these allegations."

Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian UN observer, called Thursday's General Assembly's endorsement of the report, "an important night in the history of the General Assembly and the history of fighting against impunity and seeking accountability."

The General Assembly resolution also called on Switzerland to reconvene a meeting of the parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention, which spells out the obligations of an occupying power, and Mansour said the Palestinians will start preparing for this.

Israeli Ambassador Gabriela Shalev boycotted Thursday's vote, sending Deputy Representative Danny Carmon in her place.

Carmon said the resolution "endorses and legitimizes a deeply flawed, one-sided and prejudiced report."

He said the General Assembly ignores facts on the ground related to Israel's security, and cited the recent interception of a large arms shipment from Iran destined for Hizbullah.

Indeed, prior to Thursday's vote, Israel filed a letter of complaint with Ban, urging him to press the Security Council to act against Iran.

The dispatch by Iran of 36 shipping containers of weapons on the cargo vessel Francop violates several Security Council resolutions, namely 1747, 1701 and 1373, Shalev wrote in the letter.

"The aforementioned shipment from Iran to Syria, or to any other country or entity, in particular to any terrorist entity, constitutes a severe violation of this and other resolutions," she wrote.

Listing other violations, Shalev implicated Iran's national shipping company, saying it has "repeatedly" been "found to be involved in transporting weapons and other banned items in violation of UN Security Council resolutions."

Following the Goldstone vote, which US Ambassador Susan Rice did not attend, the US mission circulated an "explanation of vote" by Deputy Permanent Representative Alejandro Wolff, who voted in Rice's place.

"As the United States made clear in Geneva, we believe that the Goldstone Report is deeply flawed," Wolff said, citing an unbalanced focus on Israel, sweeping legal conclusions and overreaching recommendations, and a failure to adequately assign responsibility to Hamas for basing its operations in civilian-populated areas.

He stressed that the matter should be handled at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva alone, saying discussion in the Security Council would be "unconstructive."

Stating that the US "strongly supports accountability" for human rights and humanitarian law violations, Wolff said the best way to end human suffering is to bring comprehensive peace to the region, including a two-state solution.

"As we urge the parties to restart permanent-status negotiations leading to the creation of a Palestinian state, we should all be seeking to advance the cause of peace - and doing nothing to hinder it," he said.

The UN resolution was passed two days after the US House of Representatives passed a non-binding resolution calling the Goldstone Report "irredeemably biased and unworthy of further consideration or legitimacy."

US Jewish groups - from B'nai B'rith to the American Jewish Committee to the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations - criticized the UN vote.

"In the event that this matter is referred to the UN Security Council," said AJC Executive Director David Harris, "we urge member states to dismiss the recommendations of the Goldstone Commission, which was grossly prejudiced against Israel from its inception."

On Monday, Lieberman and Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon will head to Denmark and the Netherlands where they will speak with European and Israeli diplomats about both the Goldstone Report and the shipment of Iranian arms which Israel confiscated last week. Israel has argued that the UN should condemn Iran's actions rather than Israel's. Lieberman plans to thank the Netherlands for its stance on the Goldstone Report.

The two officials will also discuss an upgrade of European Union relations with Israel.

In related news, the Anti-Defamation League said the Goldstone Report has become "a cause celebre in the Arab press," which has published anti-Israel cartoons in response to the document.

Among the examples cited by the ADL is a cartoon published in Alraya in Qatar on October 17 that portrays a Jew putting the Goldstone Report into a shredder.

AP contributed to this report.

 

Dialoog zonder Israëli's levert geen vrede op maar wel EU-subsidie via Cordaid

 
Het feit dat bij de huiskamerconcerten die de Nederlandse componist Merlijn Twaalfhoven in Jeruzalem organiseerde, geen Israëli's welkom zijn is in de Nederlandse media onder de pet gehouden, vooral in het NOS journaal.
 
Twaalfhoven then added, "The local people told me months ago that Israelis cannot go. Our team [of 12 Dutch activists and eight artists] had to promise that we would not allow peaceful Israelis to come."
Apologetic over what had happened, he then spilled the beans. The €50,000 project was funded by the European Union through the Dutch charity Cordaid and the Alexandria-based Anna Lindh Euro-Mediterranean Foundation for the Dialogue between Cultures. To have said no to racism would have meant to scuttle the budget.
 
Dat kan onmogelijk de reden zijn dat Nederlandse media hier niet open over zijn. Het is ronduit schandalig dat dit project als dialoog bevorderend wordt neergezet en als zodanig subsidie ontvangt uit Nederland terwijl men in feite een discriminerend beleid voert door mensen op grond van hun nationaliteit de toegang te weigeren. Als de informatie in dit artikel wordt doodgezwegen, falen de media in hun meest basale taak om goede en onafhankelijke informatie te geven.
 
RP
-----------
 

Peace without dialogue? Impossible

By GIL ZOHAR
 
 
There aren't too many English-language journalists who have covered Arab Jerusalem as I have for In Jerusalem in recent years - reporting on everything from a home in Anata built and demolished four times and now facing a fifth demolition order, to the first shopping mall along east Jerusalem's main drag Salah a-Din Street, which received a building permit after 42 years of bureaucracy; from the al-Mamal Foundation for Contemporary Art inside the New Gate, to a conference on Palestinian refugees at al-Quds University in Abu Dis. These are all stories I have reported in an objective manner.

Thus it was that last weekend I duly RSVP'd to a guests-only invitation to the Al-Quds Underground, touted as an unconventional festival with more than 150 small shows in private spaces in the Old City. Performances included music, storytelling, dancing, short acts and food. Locations were living rooms, a library, courtyards, gardens and more unique places. My expectation of a celebration of Jerusalem's diversity was dashed, however, when I arrived late Saturday afternoon at the Damascus Gate meeting point. Politely asked in English by Jamal Goseh, the director of the a-Nuzha Hakawati Theater near the American Colony Hotel, "Where do you live?" I responded in Arabic that I live in Jerusalem. From my accent and appearance, he discerned that I am an Israeli.

Al-Quds Underground's artistic director Merlijn Twaalfhoven of Amsterdam then told me, along with some Israeli peace activists who had arrived, that we were not welcome. My reply that I had been invited was to no avail, nor was my guarded threat to pen an expose of their racism.

And so here it is.

For the sake of fairness, I met Twaalfhoven the next day to allow him an opportunity to explain… or dig himself a deeper hole. (Goseh declined my request for an interview.) "We want to bring art to the world," he began. "I sometimes break through the boundaries between art and life. That is the core of my work."

A visionary creator of art happenings such as a dance performance at the Jalazoun refugee camp near Ramallah and the Long Distance Call concert on the rooftops of the Turkish half of the divided Cypriot city of Nicosia, Twaalfhoven said he had vaguely heard that the Arab League had chosen Jerusalem as Al-Quds 2009 Capital of Arab Culture and that the Israeli government had banned the festival as a political event forbidden under the Oslo Accords. "I don't know the details. I thought it was a good idea to bring people together."

Twaalfhoven then added, "The local people told me months ago that Israelis cannot go. Our team [of 12 Dutch activists and eight artists] had to promise that we would not allow peaceful Israelis to come."
 
Apologetic over what had happened, he then spilled the beans. The €50,000 project was funded by the European Union through the Dutch charity Cordaid and the Alexandria-based Anna Lindh Euro-Mediterranean Foundation for the Dialogue between Cultures. To have said no to racism would have meant to scuttle the budget.

Al-Quds Underground's no-Israelis rule is part of a larger policy set by the Palestinian Boycott Divestment and Sanctions National Committee. This BDS movement, founded in 2005, can take credit for the cancellation of Leonard Cohen's September concert at the Ramallah Cultural Palace.

Similarly in 2007, BDS activists succeeded in getting Canadian rock 'n' roll star Bryan Adams to pull the plug on back-to-back concerts in Jericho and Tel Aviv. Organized by the New York-based One Million Voices, the concerts were intended to promote a two-state solution to resolve the festering Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

BDS activists in Europe and elsewhere aim to isolate and discomfit Israel just as South Africa's apartheid regime was targeted in the 1980s. This rejection of normalization of relations is a historic and strategic mistake based on the false analogy between apartheid and Zionism.

Never mind the snub I received Saturday. On a broader level, the BDS movement is missing the point that peace is best promoted at a grassroots level, person to person, Jew to Arab, and Arab to Jew.

Those who think Israel can be pressured into coexistence are mistaken. Two states for two peoples will be embraced when enough people demand it. BDS fosters the illusion that Palestinians can achieve their goal of statehood without ever accepting Israel and Israelis.

Boycott, divest and sanction? I respond, Embrace, invest and encourage. Peace starts among people. Anyone unprepared for honest dialogue with the other is suffering from acute xenophobia. As Black Panther activist Eldridge Cleaver once remarked, "You're either part of the solution or you're part of the problem."

 

zondag 8 november 2009

Wereld dringt bij Abbas aan om zich toch weer kandidaat te stellen

 
Ondanks de vele kritiek die ik op hem heb, is het de vraag of Abbas' vertrek het vredesproces vooruit helpt. Abbas was in zijn 'dubblespeak' in ieder geval minder extreem dan Arafat, en 'martelaren' krijgen voor zover ik weet onder zijn bestuur alleen morele, en geen financiële of materiale steun. Een president die de Palestijnse gewapende strijd en de ideologie van martelarenschap ook moreel veroordeelt is zijn leven niet zeker, en wacht waarschijnlijk eenzelfde lot als Rabin. Toch had Abbas naar mijn idee veel meer kunnen doen om de Palestijnen voor te bereiden op vrede en op acceptatie en erkenning van een Joodse staat op een deel van wat vroeger Palestina was.
 
RP
-----------

JPost  - The Jerusalem Post
Nov 6, 2009 22:17 | Updated Nov 7, 2009 8:45
World urges Abbas to rethink decision
By AP AND JPOST.COM STAFF
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1257455200379&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner asserted on Friday that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas's decision not to run for a second term in the January 2010 elections was a "threat to peace" in the Middle East.

France's foreign minister said Abbas's generation was the best hope for settling the Mideast conflict, adding that Abbas's decision was a threat not only to peace, but "for us also."

Kouchner stated that French officials would discuss peace efforts with Syrian President Bashar Assad, as well as with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, when both leaders visit Paris next week in order to conduct separate meetings with French President Nicolas Sarkozy.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmed Davutoglu said he hoped "the decision by Mr. Abbas is not his final decision."

Kouchner and Davutoglu held talks in Paris on Friday.

The Moroccan Foreign Ministry also added its voice to those expressing concern over Abbas's decision, imploring him to run in the upcoming elections and praising his "proven leadership" and ability to renew peace talks, Israel Radio reported later on Friday.

Abbas announced Thursday he was not inclined to run once again for office in the 2010 elections he himself had announced, citing the stalemate in peace talks and "Israel's policy" as a major contributing factor to his decision.

On Thursday evening, after Abbas declared his intention to withdraw his candidacy from the January 24 presidential elections, Defense Minister Ehud Barak issued a statement in which he expressed hope that despite Abbas's declaration, the efforts to commence negotiations and reach a peace deal were essential to Israel's safety and the future of the entire area would not be hampered.

Barak stressed the importance of both sides' continued adherence to the principle of promoting negotiations toward an arrangement. The defense minister reiterated his support of exhausting every effort in order to reach a two-state solution, while safeguarding Israel's security interests.

Also commenting on Abbas's announcement was White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs, who told reporters Thursday that whatever Abbas decided, the US would "look forward to continuing to work with him and to continue in that collaboration to make the lives of Palestinians better."

Gibbs also stressed that "we have tremendous respect for President Abbas. He has been an important and historic leader for the Palestinian people and a true partner for the United States."

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reacted to Abbas's speech by praising his leadership in working toward the creation of a Palestinian state next to Israel.

She seemingly ignored a question about whether she would try to persuade Abbas to stay on and said: "I look forward to working with President Abbas in any new capacity to help achieve this goal."

Iran weigert uranium deal met Westen

 
Het is duidelijk dat Iran ieder compromis afwijst en zich van niemand iets aantrekt. Om het met Dries van Agt te zeggen: Iran in al haar arrogantie lapt het internationale recht aan haar laars en weigert iedere dialoog en compromis. Wie niet horen wil, moet maar voelen. Oeps, Van Agt zei dit niet over Iran, maar over een land dat Iran meermaals heeft gedreigd van de kaart te vegen.
 
RP
----------
 
Report: Iran won't trade enriched uraniuml - refuses main part of draft agreement
 
Last update - 12:08 07/11/2009    
By Haaretz Service 

 
Iran will not exchange its domestically low-enriched uranium with the West to supply Tehran's reactor fuel, the Chief of Iran's Parliament National Security and Foreign Policy Commission said on Saturday, in what seems as a direct rebuff of a UN-drafted deal.
 
"Iran is not to give any of its 1200 kilograms fuel to the other party to receive 20 percent [enriched] fuel and whether gradually or at once, this will not be done and is called off," Alaeddin Boroujerdi told the ISNA news agency.
 
The Iranian official was referring to a recently drafted UN proposal according to Iran would transfer 1.2 tons of low-enriched uranium produced in its nuclear site Natanz to Russia, where it would be enriched to 20 percent, then to be transferred to France for industrial processing, after which it would be returned to the Tehran Research Reactor, which produces medical isotopes.
 
Boroujerdi also stated that Iran and fuel supplier countries must find a new way to provide Tehran's reactor fuel.
 
"Presently, Mr. Soltanieh is in talks to find an approach for the issue," Boroujerdi added, referring to Tehran's envoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Ali Asghar Soltanieh.
 
"Referring tp remarks by some western officials that Iran must respond to the IAEA brokered deal regarding purchase of fuel in two days, Boroujerdi said, "The west cannot see a deadline and we are not committed to their remarks."
 
On Friday, a hardline Iranian cleric told worshippers that the The United Nations nuclear watchdog is legally obliged to provide Iran with nuclear fuel for its research reactor without setting any conditions.
 
Ahmad Khatami, a member of a powerful clerical body that can appoint or dismiss Iran's supreme leader, said in a sermon broadcast on state radio that Iran was prepared to produce fuel for its Tehran reactor if world powers insisted on the deal.
 
"The International Atomic Energy Agency is legally obliged to provide fuel ... if you want to play games with us then I can assure you that we will produce it by ourselves," Khatami told worshippers at Tehran University. "The Iranian nation is wise and will not be deceived by the nuclear deal."
 
"Why should we send our low enriched uranium abroad? ... who can guarantee that you will then provide us with the needed fuel?" said Khatami.
 
The United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China have tried for years to persuade Iran to suspend uranium enrichment activities in return for economic and political incentives.
 
Tehran has so far refused to halt its enrichment.
 
Katami said Iran had no intention of yielding to the West's pressure over its nuclear program.
 
"No one has traded over the Iranian nation's legitimate nuclear right," said the cleric in the sermon, which was broadcast live.
 
The West's priority is to reduce Iran's LEU stockpile to prevent any danger that the Islamic Republic might turn it into the highly enriched uranium needed for a nuclear bomb.
 

Iran testte ontwerpen voor kleine kernkoppen op raketten

 
Dit is zeer verontrustend, maar uiteraard geen reden om de druk op Iran verder op te voeren, een handelsboycot af te kondigen of anderszins maatregelen te nemen. Vooral links, vroeger altijd zo voor boycots en tegen militarisme, heeft met Iran en haar nucleaire programma om een of andere reden geen moeite.
 
RP
---------
 
Boom!: Iran tested advanced nuclear warhead design – secret report
 
Iran has evidently been experimenting with nuclear warheads. They will explain that the warheads are intended to produce electricity. Juan Cole will explain that it is an error in the translation, and J Street will insist on more dialogue. The USA National Intelligence estimate will determine that there is a high probability that there is a medium probability that they haven't the foggiest notion what is going on, and a medium probability that there is a high probability that they understand all too well what is going on but do not want to admit it.
 
Ami Isseroff
 
=====================
 
 
Exclusive: Watchdog fears Tehran has key component to put bombs in missiles
 
Julian Borger, diplomatic editor
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 5 November 2009 20.45 GMT
 

The UN's nuclear watchdog has asked Iran to explain evidence suggesting that Iranian scientists have experimented with an advanced nuclear warhead design, the Guardian has learned.
 
The very existence of the technology, known as a "two-point implosion" device, is officially secret in both the US and Britain, but according to previously unpublished documentation in a dossier compiled by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iranian scientists may have tested high-explosive components of the design. The development was today described by nuclear experts as "breathtaking" and has added urgency to the effort to find a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear crisis.
 
The sophisticated technology, once mastered, allows for the production of smaller and simpler warheads than older models. It reduces the diameter of a warhead and makes it easier to put a nuclear warhead on a missile.
 
Documentation referring to experiments testing a two-point detonation design are part of the evidence of nuclear weaponisation gathered by the IAEA and presented to Iran for its response.
 
The dossier, titled "Possible Military Dimensions of Iran's Nuclear Program", is drawn in part from reports submitted to it by western intelligence agencies.
 
The agency has in the past treated such reports with scepticism, particularly after the Iraq war. But its director general, Mohamed ElBaradei, has said the evidence of Iranian weaponisation "appears to have been derived from multiple sources over different periods of time, appears to be generally consistent, and is sufficiently comprehensive and detailed that it needs to be addressed by Iran".
 
Extracts from the dossier have been published previously, but it was not previously known that it included documentation on such an advanced warhead. "It is breathtaking that Iran could be working on this sort of material," said a European government adviser on nuclear issues.
 
James Acton, a British nuclear weapons expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said: "It's remarkable that, before perfecting step one, they are going straight to step four or five ... To start with more sophisticated designs speaks of level of technical ambition that is surprising."
 
Another western specialist with extensive knowledge of the Iranian programme said: "It raises the question of who supplied this to them. Did AQ Khan [a Pakistani scientist who confessed in 2004 to running a nuclear smuggling ring] have access to this, or is it another player?"
 
The revelation of the documents comes at a time of growing tension. Tehran has so far rejected a deal that would remove most of its enriched uranium stockpile for a year and replace it with nuclear fuel rods which would be much harder to turn into weapons. The Iranian government has also balked at negotiations, which were due to begin last week, over its continued enrichment of uranium, in defiance of UN security council resolutions.
 
There are fears in Washington and London that if no deal is reached to at least temporarily defuse tensions by the end of December, Israel could set in motion plans to take military action aimed at setting back the Iranian programme by force, with incalculable consequences for the Middle East.
 
Iran has rejected most of the IAEA material on weaponisation as forgeries, but has admitted carrying out tests on multiple high-explosive detonations synchronised to within a microsecond. Tehran has told the agency that there is a civilian application for such tests, but has so far not provided any evidence for them.
 
Western weapons experts say there are no such civilian applications, but the use of co-ordinated detonations in nuclear warheads is well known. They compress the fissile core, or pit, of the warhead until it reaches critical mass.
 
A US national intelligence estimate two years ago said that Iran had explored nuclear warhead design for several years but had probably stopped in 2003. British, French and German officials have said they believe weaponisation continued after that date and may still be continuing.
 
In September, a German court found a German-Iranian businessman, Mohsen Vanaki, guilty of brokering the sale of dual-use equipment with possible applications in developing nuclear weapons. The equipment included specialised high-speed cameras, of the sort used to develop implosion devices, as well as radiation detectors. According to a report by the Institute for Science and International Security, the German foreign intelligence service, the Bundesnachrichtendienst, testified at the trial that there was evidence that Iran's weapons development was continuing.
 
The IAEA is seeking to find out what the scientists and the institutions involved in the experiments are doing now, but has so far not been given a response. The agency's repeated requests to interview Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, whose name features heavily in the IAEA's documentation and who is widely seen as the father of the Iranian nuclear programme, have been turned down.
 
The agency has also asked Iran to explain evidence that a Russian weapons expert helped Iranian technicians to master synchronised high-explosive detonations.
 
The first implosion devices, like the "Fat Man" bomb dropped on Nagasaki on 9 August 1945, used 32 high-explosive hexagons and pentagons arrayed around a plutonium core like the panels of a football. The IAEA has a five-page document describing experimentation on such a hemispherical array of explosives.
 
According to a diplomat familiar with the IAEA documentation, the evidence also points to experiments with a two-point detonation system that represents "a more elegant solution" to the challenges of making a nuclear warhead, but it is much harder to achieve. It is used in conjunction with a non-spherical pit, in the shape of a rugby ball, or explosives in that shape wrapped around a spherical pit, and it works by compressing the pit from both ends.The IAEA has expressed "serious concern" about Iran's failure to give an account of the research its scientists have carried out.
 
Descriptions of "two-point implosion" warheads designs have occasionally appeared in the public domain (there are extensive descriptions on Wikipedia) and they were first developed by US scientists in the 1950s, but it remains an offence for American officials or even non-governmental nuclear experts with security clearance to discuss them.
 
 

Israel en Europese Unie tekenen landbouw handelsverdrag

 
Eindelijk weer eens positief nieuws. Hopelijk wordt ook die andere overeenkomst binnenkort getekend.

Approximately one billion USD of Israeli agricultural and processed food products are exported to the EU each year. Europe is Israel's most important trading partner in the agricultural field, with more than 25% of Israel's agricultural product and more than 75% of its total fresh agricultural products exported to Europe. The Ministry of Agriculture predicts that the new agreement will serve to expand agricultural exports, an important development given that more than 60% of exports to Europe come from the Arava and Negev regions.
 
RP
----------


Israel and European Union sign agricultural agreement
(Communicated by the MFA Spokesperson)
4 Nov 2009

On Wednesday, November 4, 2009, a new agricultural agreement was signed in Brussels between Israel and the European Union. The new agreement, which updates the original agricultural agreement signed in the 1970's, is the result of lengthy negotiations led by Israel's Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor. Since the original signing, the agreement has been updated several times in order to reflect the significant changes in the needs of both parties.

Access to the markets of both sides has been greatly improved under the new agreement. In the processed agricultural products sector, over 95% of the products will be exempt from all taxes or levies. Considerable liberalization was undertaken in regards to all areas of fresh produce and approximately 80% will be exempt from all customs restrictions.

Israel's Ambassador to the European Union, Ran Curiel, signed the agreement for Israel, while Christian Danielsson, Ambassador of Sweden, the current president of the EU, signed in the name of the Europeans.

The agricultural agreement constitutes one element in the wide range of existing agreements between Israel and the EU, which include the Israel-EU Association Agreement, the Israeli-EU Action Plan as part of the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP), the Euro-Mediterranean partnership, as well as Israel's participation in a score of European programs and agencies, such as the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development.

Approximately one billion USD of Israeli agricultural and processed food products are exported to the EU each year. Europe is Israel's most important trading partner in the agricultural field, with more than 25% of Israel's agricultural product and more than 75% of its total fresh agricultural products exported to Europe. The Ministry of Agriculture predicts that the new agreement will serve to expand agricultural exports, an important development given that more than 60% of exports to Europe come from the Arava and Negev regions.

Israel uses the world's leading technologies in the intensive production of fruits, vegetables and flowers. Most of Israel's agricultural activities are conducted in periphery and desert areas. Both Israel and the EU view the existence of active and modern rural areas as essential as they are used to preserve open spaces and prevent rapid urbanization processes.

Hamas leider Khaled Meshaal roept Abbas op vredesonderhandelingen te stoppen

 
Palestina sympathisanten, alsmede de meeste journalisten, zullen in onderstaande een gematigde verklaring lezen dat Hamas een Palestijnse staat binnen 1967 grenzen accepteert en dus bereid is Israel te erkennen. Zijn handreiking aan Abbas is altemeer bewijs van de verandering ten goede bij Hamas. Met 'verzet' wordt uiteraard alleen vreedzaam verzet bedoeld en heilige strijd verwijst uiteraard naar innerlijke strijd en heeft eveneens niks met geweld te maken.
 
"Any leader who insists on the right of return for the Palestinian refugees and on restoring the land, even to the 1967 borders ... must know that the way to do this is not through negotiations or betting on the Americans but through holy struggle, resistance and national unity," Meshaal said.
 
Ik lees bovenstaande als dat men het hele land wil bevrijden van de rivier tot de zee, en dat dat alleen mogelijk is d.m.v. strijd en verzet, maar dat zelfs de 'bevrijding' van alleen de bezette gebieden niet mogelijk zou zijn door middel van onderhandelingen. De verwijzing naar het 'recht op terugkeer' maakt de hele discussie over of men wel of geen '67 grenzen zou accepteren natuurlijk per definitie betekenisloos.
 
RP
--------

Stick to resistance path, stop negotiations
07-11-2009,08:53
www. qassam.ps/news-2018-Stick_to_resistance_path_stop_negotiations.html

 
Al Qassam Website/Agencies - Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal urged Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Friday to stop seeking compromise with Israel but offered him an olive branch, saying Palestinians must end their divisions.

Mashaal said that Hamas "stretches its hand" to Abbas's Fatah faction to end divisions between the two sides undermining the Palestinian cause.

"Courage dictates that we, as leaders of the Palestinians, be frank with our people and evaluate what compromise has brought us, decide together to suspend or freeze the political settlement process and pursue our real national options," Meshaal told a rally in the Syrian capital.

He said compromise with Israel, starting with the 1993 Oslo Accords, had failed to stop Israeli settlement expansion and brought Palestinians no closer to establishing an independent state in the land Israel has occupied since the 1967 Middle East War.

Abbas suspended talks with Israel during the Israeli invasion of Gaza in December and U.S. efforts to re-start them have since failed. Hamas has opposed the talks and rejected Western demands to recognize Israel.

"Any leader who insists on the right of return for the Palestinian refugees and on restoring the land, even to the 1967 borders ... must know that the way to do this is not through negotiations or betting on the Americans but through holy struggle, resistance and national unity," Meshaal said.

"Our hand is stretched out to reconcile with our brothers in Fatah and the Palestinian presidency to achieve our national project," he said.