zondag 5 juli 2009

Mensenrechten op de Westoever: Hoe de Palestijnen te helpen

 
De prijs van de relatieve rust en veiligheid op de Westelijke Jordaanoever is een soms bruut en willekeurig optredend politieapparaat dat ook de persvrijheid beknot en onschuldige slachtoffers maakt. Hervorming en samenvoeging van de vele veiligheidsdiensten van de PA staat al jaren op het verlanglijstje van de sponsors, maar men durft blijkbaar niet te dreigen om de geldkraan dicht te draaien als er niets verbetert. Wellicht is er de afgelopen jaren ook wel wat verbeterd, je leest er weinig over, of is beter niet haalbaar in die situatie en omgeving? De Arabische buurlanden doen het doorgaans ook niet beter, dus het ligt beslist niet alleen aan de Israëlische bezetting die zo makkelijk van alles de schuld krijgt.
 
Wouter
________________
 
How To Help the Palestinians
by Khaled Abu Toameh
Wednesday, Jul. 01, 2009 at 10:36 AM
 
 
The leaders of the Palestinian Authority do not want the international community to hear anything about massive abuse of human rights and intimidation of journalists that its security forces are practicing almost on a daily basis in the West Bank.

They do not want the world to see that, with the help of the Americans and some Europeans, they are building more prisons and security forces than hospitals and housing projects for the needy.

They want the US and the rest of the world to continue believing that peace will prevail tomorrow morning only if Israel stops construction in the settlements and removes a number of empty caravans from remote and isolated hilltops in the West Bank.

The Palestinians do not need a dictatorship that harasses and terrorizes journalists, and that is responsible for the death of detainees in its prisons. In the Arab world we already have enough dictatorships.

The Palestinians do not need additional security forces, militias and armed gangs. In fact, there are too many of them, both in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

American and European taxpayers' money should be invested in building hospitals, schools and housing projects. Investing billions of dollars in training thousands of policemen and establishing new security forces and prisons will not advance the cause of peace and coexistence.

There is no doubt that many Palestinians would love to abandon the culture of uniform and weapons in favor of improved infrastructure and medical care.

As for the international media, it's time to abandon the policy of double standards in covering the Israeli-Arab conflict. For many years, the mainstream media in the US and Europe turned a blind eye to stories about financial corruption under Yasser Arafat. The result was that Arafat and his cronies got away with stealing billions of dollars that had been donated to the Palestinians by the Americans and Europeans.

Back then, many foreign journalists said they believed that the stories about financial corruption in the Palestinian areas were "Zionist propaganda." Other journalists said they would rather file an anti-Israel story because this way they would become more popular with their editors and publishers.

Recently, a Palestinian TV crew was stopped at a checkpoint in the West Bank, where soldiers confiscated a tape and erased its content.

This incident, hardly received any coverage in the mainstream media in the US and Europe.

The reason? The perpetrators were not IDF soldiers, but Palestinian Authority security officers. And the checkpoint did not belong to the IDF; it was, in fact, a Palestinian checkpoint.

The story of the detention of the TV crew -- which, by the way, belonged to Al-Jazeera and the erasure of the footage did not make it to the mainstream media even after Reporters Without Borders, an organization that defends journalists worldwide, issued a statement strongly condemning the assault on the freedom of the media.

"Journalists must be able to work freely," Reporters Without Borders said. "The erasure of this video footage proves that the Palestinian security forces try to cover up their human rights violations. This incident should be the subject of an enquiry by the Palestinian Authority."

Walid Omari, the head of the Qatar-based satellite TV station's operations in the West Bank, told Reporters Without Borders that his crew was preparing a report on the death of a detainee at the Palestinian Authority detention center in Hebron that might have been the result of torture.

"We were the only ones to investigate this case and we did it despite strong pressure from the Palestinian Authority," Omari said.

Al Jazeera's Hebron correspondent went with a cameraman to the victim's home in the village of Dura, where they interviewed the family and filmed the body.

As they were returning to Hebron in a vehicle displaying the word "Press," they were detained by Palestinian Authority security forces at a checkpoint and taken to a police station, where the video footage they had just recorded was erased. They were allowed to go after an hour.

One can only imagine the international media's reaction had the TV crew been detained by Israeli security forces. Anti-Israel groups and individuals would have cited the incident as further proof of the "occupation's brutal measures" against the freedom of the media.

Moreover, it is highly likely that Israeli human rights organizations like Betselem would have dispatched researchers to the field to investigate the incident had IDF soldiers been involved.

Yet foreign journalists and human rights activists working in Israel and the Palestinian territories either chose to ignore the story or never heard about it simply because it was lacking in an anti-Israel angle.

One can also imagine how the media and human rights organizations would have reacted had a Palestinian died in Israeli prison after allegedly being tortured.

Haitham Amr, a male nurse, was detained by the Palestinian Authority's US-backed and trained General Intelligence Force on suspicion of being affiliated with Hamas. He was one of more than 700 Palestinians who are being held without trial in West Bank prisons that are run by security forces loyal to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.

These security forces, which are being referred to by many Palestinians as the Dayton Forces [a reference to ret. US general and security coordinator Keith Dayton], claimed that Amr was killed after he jumped from the second floor of a building where he was being held in Hebron. The family and human rights organizations insist that Amr died as a result of severe torture.

If the Palestinian Authority really had nothing to fear, why did it send its police officers to detain the TV crew and confiscate the tape? Is the Palestinian Authority trying to hide something?

True, Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salaam Fayad hold more moderate views than Hamas's Ismail Haniyeh and Khaled Mashaal.

But Abbas and Fayad do not enjoy enough credibility among their own people, largely due to their open ties with Israel and the West. The security and financial support that the Americans and Europeans are giving to the Palestinian Authority is nothing but a bear hug.

That is perhaps why they chose to ignore the story about the male nurse whose family says was tortured to death by security officers who receive their salaries from US and European taxpayers' money.

 

Israel overweegt verzachten Gaza blokkade om Shalit vrij te krijgen

 
Ik vind het niet gerechtvaardigd om de hele bevolking van de Gazastrook onder druk te zetten door de levering van etenswaren, kleding en allerlei gebruiksvoorwerpen te beperken vanwege de gijzeling van één soldaat. Anderzijds IS Gaza een vijandig gebied waarmee Israel op voet van oorlog verkeerd en wiens regime haar vernietiging nastreeft. Juist de apologeten die beweren dat Hamas de legitieme, gekozen regering van deze Palestijnen is, hebben geen recht van klagen: deze democratische regering hoeft alleen één soldaat vrij te laten -in ruil voor vele Palestijnse gevangenen- om het lijden van haar onderdanen aanzienlijk te verzachten.
 
Wouter
_____________
 
 
Last update - 08:03 04/07/2009
Report: Israel mulling easing Gaza siege
By The Associated Press 
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1097645.html


The Defense Ministry has recommended a partial lifting of the embargo on the Gaza Strip as a goodwill gesture toward the Palestinians to spur talks to free a long-held captive soldier, Israeli media reported Friday.

Israel has been linking the opening of Gaza's borders to the release of abducted Israel Defense Forces soldier Gilad Shalit, who has been held by Hamas militants for more than three years. Hamas has been pushing for a deal to trade him for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners currently held in Israeli jails.

Israel imposed a near-total embargo of the Gaza Strip in 2007 after Hamas militants violently took control of the territory.

According to the new plan, reported by the news Web site Ynet, Israel would increase supplies of coffee, tea, soup, meat, fish and canned goods into Gaza ahead of the holy Muslim month of Ramadan, which begins in August, to promote a deal for Shalit.

Israel would also renew shipments of fuel, clothing, kitchenware and egg-laying chickens as part of the package.

Ynet reported that the proposal had been drafted by defense officials and awaits the approval of Defense Minister Ehud Barak.

The Defense Ministry would not officially comment on the report.

Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh said Friday that if there was any truth to the report, it would represent a righting of a previous wrong.

"The Palestinian people have one single, clear demand - the siege must be lifted and all the crossings have to be open and life to get back to normal in the Gaza Strip," he told reporters outside a Gaza mosque after Friday prayers.

The idea behind the plan, according to Ynet, was to lift the embargo gradually and link it to progress on Egyptian-mediated talks aimed at releasing Shalit from captivity. The plan does not include transferring products such as steel and concrete, which are needed to rebuild the battered territory but could also help Hamas improve its military capabilities.

Hamas and other militants have fired thousands of missiles at Israeli border towns and communities in recent years.

Israel has come under heavy pressure from the international community - including the Obama administration - to lift its embargo, which has crippled the Gaza economy. Gaza has survived largely thanks to a booming underground smuggling trade between Gaza and Egypt.
 
 

zaterdag 4 juli 2009

PA verhinderde Hamas aanslag op Abbas

 
De PA lijkt de veiligheidssituatie op de Westoever steeds beter onder controle te hebben, en Hamas 'activisten' voelen zich schijnbaar in het nauw gedreven.
Is Haaretz politiek correct? In 'mijn tijd' gingen aktivisten de straat op met folders, affiches en spandoeken, of blokkeerden wel eens een toegangsweg voor onze tegenstanders. Staken was ook nog een optie. Een wapen en een foto van mijn doelwit heb ik nooit op zak gehad...
 
Wouter
 
____________

PA: Arrested Hamas activists planned to assassinate Abbas
By Avi Issacharoff - Haaretz
Last update - 03:21 03/07/2009
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1097504.html

 
Hamas activists arrested by the Palestinian Authority have admitted to tracking the movements of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and to gathering intelligence on his security, PA sources told Haaretz.

Their motive clearly was to assassinate Abbas, the sources said.

"Hamas' intention was to scuttle the reconciliation talks [between Hamas and Fatah] in Cairo and to create chaos in the West Bank, in contrast to the sense of security that has characterized the territory for the past two years," Fatah spokesman Fahmi Zarir told Haaretz.

Palestinian Authority Secretary Taib Abd-Arahim had said Monday amid the Cairo talks that Palestinian security forces had arrested 10 Hamas members planning to attack PA institutions. The detainees admitted they were planning to assassinate several senior Palestinian Authority officials on July 1, in order to halt the conciliation talks, he said.

Now, new details have now emerged about the plot: The Hamas activists were caught with weapons, maps and photos of senior Palestinian officers. The photos and maps indicated the cell was conducting surveillance on Abbas himself.

Sources say Palestinian security forces have detailed confessions in which the suspects acknowledged planning to assassinate several PA officials and stated they were observing Abbas' movements. PA sources say their motive was clear: to assassinate Abbas. The cell had three to five members, between the ages of 25 and 30.

A spokesman for Hamas' military wing has denied the allegations. However, if they are true, this is evidence not only of Hamas' intention to scuttle reconciliation with Fatah, but also to stage a coup of sorts against the Palestinian Authority. Reports suggest Hamas' military wing has an extremist agenda, but Hamas' political leadership in the west bank is thought not to have been aware of the plot.

Saoedi-Arabië weigert concrete vredesgebaren naar Israël

 
Is het gewoon een kwestie van wie de eerste stap zet, het eerste gebaar maakt? Als Israel nu onafhankelijk van toezeggingen vooraf, de nederzettingenbouw bevriest en serieus werk gaat maken van het ontruimen van buitenposten, is dan niet een tegengebaar van Arabische zijde te verwachten? Omgekeerd, als de Arabieren nu zonder voorwaarden vooraf verklaren dat ze Israël willen erkennen en vrede ermee sluiten, ze hoeven wellicht nog niks concreets daarvoor te doen zoals de voorstellen hieronder, is dan niet een duidelijk tegengebaar van Israelische zijde te verwachten? Het wantrouwen is groot van beide zijden, en elk woord en gebaar wordt kritisch afgewogen. De Arabieren hebben tot nog toe geweigerd om zelfs rechtstreeks met Israel aan tafel te gaan zitten om te praten over vrede, ondanks uitnodigingen daartoe van Olmert en zelfs van Sharon.
 
Wouter
________________

'Saudis block US push for normalization'
Herb Keinon , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
There are no guarantees the Arab world would move forward with steps of normalization toward Israel if Jerusalem declared a settlement freeze, according to assessments reaching Jerusalem, even though US President Barack Obama still believes he can convince Saudi King Abdullah to make some gesture toward Israel.

The assessments come amid reports that Israel and the US are working on a package deal that may include a time-limited moratorium on settlement construction in return for gestures from the Arab world.

According to these assessments, however, the Persian Gulf and North African states are unlikely to make significant moves unless Saudi Arabia does, and the Saudis believe they made their gesture toward Israel in the form of the 2002 Arab peace initiative.

Obama, according to these reports, still believes the Saudis can be persuaded to moved on the issue.

Among the gestures being discussed are opening trade offices, direct economic links, public cultural and educational ties, as well as overfly rights for Israeli airlines.

Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon said Thursday on Israel Radio that Israel could not be expected to take immediate steps such as a settlement freeze "when the other side isn't prepared to make a small step."

Ayalon echoed what Defense Minister Ehud Barak had been saying in recent days, that any move on settlements needed to be seen as part of a wider regional picture.

He also said, in regards to calls for a freeze for natural growth construction, that Israel "cannot strangle 300,000 residents."

Ron Dermer, the director of policy planning in the Prime Minister's Office, said in a wide-ranging interview that appeared in The Jerusalem Post, "I think if people want to reach an understanding, they can reach an understanding on the issue."

Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who returned Wednesday from his meeting a day earlier with US envoy George Mitchell in New York, has briefed Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on the talks. Netanyahu and Mitchell are expected to meet in two weeks.

In the meantime, a government official said the discussions with Washington on the issue were continuing. "The policy goal at the moment is to try reaching common ground with the US, which is where the effort is being placed. We hope that it is successful."

The official also said it was Israel's hope that if an agreement was reached, it would be endorsed by the Europeans, who have become increasingly vocal in their calls for a complete settlement freeze.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Thursday called on Israel to end settlement construction, saying such activity jeopardized efforts toward a two-state solution.

"I think it is now important to get commitments from all sides and that includes the issue of settlement building," Merkel said in a speech to the Bundestag. "I am convinced that there must be a stop to this. Otherwise we will not come to the two-state solution that is urgently needed."

Campagnes rond Israëlische voorzitter wereldartsenorganisatie WMA

 
Stuart Palmer is een vriendelijke Israëli van Britse afkomst met een echtgenote geboortig uit Nederland. We hebben hen ontmoet bij een bezoek aan Haifa, waar zij in 2006 onder vuur lagen van Hezbollah raketten.
Zoals veel Israëli's maakt hij zich zorgen over de talrijke anti-Israël campagnes in hun landen van herkomst. In Engeland is dat nog een stuk erger dan hier, met diverse boycot-oproepen bij onderwijsvakbonden e.d.
 
Deze petitie is alleen bedoeld voor medici, dus graag alleen serieuze en relevante ondertekeningen. Bijna 4.000 mensen hebben tot nu toe getekend.
 
Wouter
____________
 
 
Israeli Citizens Action Network             
   ICAN     For volunteer Public Diplomacy
             
 
Dear ICAN members who are members of the medical profession
 
Anti-Israel activity and campaigns in the medical press are unfortunately nothing new; however they have reached a new "low" in the last few months. The most recent manifestation of the anti-Israel phenomenon infecting the medical world is a letter spearheaded by Dr. Derek Summerfield and signed by 725 physicians, "publicly protesting and appealing against the recent appointment of Dr. Yoram Blachar, longstanding President of the Israeli Medical Association, as President of the World Medical Association."
 
The "facts" brought in the letter are nothing new. There were allegations made against Israel of torture, but no names were provided. An effort was made by the Israeli Medical Association, to speak personally with each and every physician who signed the letter, that could be located and most were never employed by, nor had any connection to, the Israeli Prison Services as claimed in the letter. Of the three who were employed there, all vigorously denied any involvement in interrogations, torture or medical approval for the above.
 
The letter further states that Dr. Blachar has made statements which were untrue on at least 10 occasions in the Lancet and the BMJ. No basis is made for these claims other than the opinion of the authors.
 
Finally, Summerfield goes so far as to accuse the IMA ethics chairman, Prof. Avinoam Reches, of being personally involved in torture. Whatever political views one may hold, we firmly believe that politics has no place in medicine. Medicine is meant to serve as a bridge, not a divide. The intermingling of medicine and politics is dangerous, particularly when opinions, presented as facts, are presented on the pages of medical journals.
 
The current situation is viewed as extremely dangerous for the future of Israeli medicine, of academic freedom and international cooperation.
 
ACTION  - IF YOU ARE INVOLVED IN THE MEDICAL PROFESSION, a letter of support for Dr. Blachar, for the IMA and for Israeli medicine can be found at: http://www.petition.fm/petitions/ima  
 
Please sign your name and country and in the 'Notes' section please include your title, field of medicine (or other) and place of employment. Please send this letter on to others who you feel might be similarly interested in expressing support. 
 
Stuart Palmer
Director
 

IDF schiet jonge Palestijnse moeder neer bij checkpoint?

 
Waar de IDF al niet goed voor is. Een paar jaar terug werd er bericht over Palestijnen die zich opzettelijk lieten opsluiten om in Israelische gevangenissen rustig en comfortabel te kunnen studeren (van Israelisch belastingsgeld?), en nu levert Israel ook onbedoeld hulp bij zelfdoding?
 
Als haar poging geslaagd was, had Israel weer internationale veroordelingen aan haar broek gehad van bijv. de VN Mensenrechtenraad, wegens het neerknallen van een jonge Palestijnse moeder met een speelgoedgeweertje, met in de NRC een foto van een huilend weeskind...
 
Wouter
_________________

Palestinian woman wounded by IDF fire
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
A Palestinian woman carrying a suspicious object was moderately wounded by IDF fire on Friday morning near the Bekaot checkpoint in the Jordan Valley, north of Jericho.

The soldiers shot at the woman's lower body after shooting in the air and after she did not heed their calls to stop advancing towards them, the military said.

After the woman was shot, the soldiers discovered she was carrying a toy gun. She was evacuated to Haemek Hospital in Afula in moderate condition.

An officer of the Civil Administration who interrogated the wounded woman asked her why she acted in the way she did. She showed him bruise marks on her hands and said she wanted to kill herself after having been abused in her house. The woman is an 18-year-old, married with a child.

The IDF said troops at the checkpoint acted according to protocol.

Three years ago, a gunman shot and killed an IDF soldier at the same checkpoint. IDF soldier St.-Sgt. Ro'i Farjun was killed at there in August 2006, after a Palestinian opened fire at him. Troops returned fire, killing the gunman.
 

IDF reaktie op Gaza rapport Amnesty International


De IDF bijt stevig van zich af in onderstaande reaktie op het rapport van Amnesty International over de Gaza Oorlog, zonder echter op specifieke aanklachten in te gaan. Of het wijs is van Israel om medewerking te weigeren aan dit onderzoek of het nog lopende VN onderzoek is maar de vraag. Uit eigen IDF onderzoek bleek het merendeel van de Palestijnse doden wel degelijk strijders te betreffen, maar dat overtuigde weinigen omdat het IDF natuurlijk niet onpartijdig is. De Palestijnse bronnen van Amnesty in de door Hamas gecontroleerde Gazastrook kunnen echter evenmin zonder meer worden vertrouwd, en ook de Verenigde Naties is berucht om haar anti-Israel beleid. Amnesty lijkt zich echter vierkant achter de VN-lijn te scharen.
 
Dat Amnesty, dat overigens ook Hamas beschuldigde van schending van het internationaal humanitaire recht, tot een wapenembargo tegen beide partijen oproept totdat het oorlogsrecht gewaarborgd kan worden, is onhoudbaar. Hamas - en Hezbollah - gaat toch wel door met de smokkel van door Iran en co geleverde wapens, en de precisiewapens die Israel vaak gebruikt hebben juist tot doel het aantal burgerslachtoffers te minimaliseren. Dat er toch nog honderden burgerdoden vielen komt deels door grove onverschilligheid bij soldaten en commandanten, maar hoofdzakelijk door de aard van de a-symetrische strijd tegen een guerrillaleger in een dichtbevolkt gebied, en soms door domme misverstanden in de mist van de oorlog.
 
Wouter
_______________

IDF response to Amnesty Report
(Communicated by the IDF Spokesperson)
2 July 2009

 
We find it both questionable and objectionable that a well-respected and ostensibly objective international organization such as Amnesty could produce a report on Operation Cast Lead without properly recognizing the unbearable reality of nine years of incessant and indiscriminate rocket fire on the citizens of Israel. The slant of their report indicates that the organization succumbed to the manipulations of the Hamas terror organization.

Operation Cast Lead was a result of nine years of Hamas' unrelenting Kassam, Grad and mortar shell fire on more than a quarter of a million of Israel's citizens. Rocket fire was Hamas' preferred terror tactic, and they ruthlessly used populated areas of the Gaza Strip in order to carry out their attacks.

We did not find in the report a proper reference to the reality of the Israeli home front or to Israeli security concerns, and therefore the report seems unbalanced. It presents a distorted view of the laws of war that does not comply with the rules implemented by democratic states battling terror.

It also ignores the efforts of the IDF to minimize as much as possible harming uninvolved noncombatant civilians. During Operation Cast Lead, the IDF utilized various fighting methods and advanced technology to minimize harm to the civilian population, while engaging terrorists who were operating from densely populated areas and using the local population as a "human shield."

In many cases, areas in which strikes of legitimate targets were to take place, as required by international law, the IDF warned the local population prior to the attack, via leaflets, radio broadcasts, and direct calls to private cellular telephones. It should be stated that the IDF only targeted military targets and avoided harming civilians, sometimes to the detriment of its own military interests.

In addition, during Operation Cast Lead, the IDF enabled for the transfer of humanitarian aid and also instated a daily several hour cease fire so that the goods could be safely distributed.

The Amnesty report ignores a critical aspect of Operation Cast Lead - Hamas consistently, deliberately and routinely violated International Law, specifically the prohibition against the use of "human shields." While Hamas was using Palestinian civilian centers to fire rockets at the citizens of Israel, the IDF went to great lengths to combat their terrorism while maintaining a firm commitment to the laws of war.

Documented evidence, from aerial drones, ground footage and independent accounts, prove, beyond all doubt, that Hamas deliberately exploited population centers - including medical, educational, recreational and religious facilities - to provide tactical cover for their terror activities.

It is to Amnesty International's discredit that the report they issued, focuses so intently on any and all IDF infractions, and ignores the blatant violations of international law perpetrated by Hamas.

Out of a professional, ethical and judicial obligation to thoroughly inspect certain claims made regarding Operation Cast Lead, the IDF conducted a number of investigations following the operation. The investigations proved that the IDF operated throughout the fighting in accordance with international law, maintaining high ethical and professional standards and in many incidents, for the sake of avoiding harm to unassociated civilians, even limited itself beyond existing judicial obligations. Nonetheless, the investigations found a few, unfortunate incidents that are unavoidable during combat - especially the type of combat Hamas forced upon the IDF during Operation Cast Lead, when it chose to fight from within civilian population centers.

In addition to the investigations ordered by the Chief of the General Staff, Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi, the IDF is currently looking into complaints that were received from various sources - private lawyers, human rights organizations (including Amnesty) and media outlets (both domestic and international) - that raise different questions regarding the way in which the IDF operated during Operation Cast Lead. In certain cases, the Chief Military Advocate has already ordered the opening of a criminal investigation.

--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

vrijdag 3 juli 2009

Hamas legt 'Koran belasting' op in Gazastrook


Vaak wordt gezegd dat Hamas geen islamitische staat wil stichten en geen religieuze regels oplegt. Religie en een extremistische ideologie zijn bij Hamas overigens nauw verbonden, en in die religieuze centra zullen Palestijnen weer fraaie dingen leren over de Joden en het Westen, en over de heilige strijd voor de bevrijding van geheel Palestina, en dat het martelarenschap het hoogst haalbare is....

RP
-----------

Gaza: Hamas imposes 'Koran levy'
Salaries of public officials in Strip to be cut in effort to reinforce Koran study centers
 
Ali Waked - YNET
 
Special Hamas tax: The Hamas government in Gaza has recently decided to cut the salaries of Palestinian Authority employees in the Strip in order to finance Koran studies.

In an effort to reinforce Koran study centers across Gaza, Hamas has decided to deduct one percent of the salaries of public officials in the Strip and earmark the funds to the Koran schools.

Notably, Koran study centers in the Strip are considered a major Hamas power source used to elicit support for the organization.

Dr. Taleb Abu Sha'r, the Minister for Religious Affairs in the Hamas government, said the decision aims to encourage Koran studies and religious devotion.

"The decision proves that the government attaches great importance to those who teach and study the Koran, and it expresses a desire to assist them," he said.

The new "Koran levy" is not the only unusual tax introduced by Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Every few months, the Hamas government enforces a deduction in the salaries of each public official in order to pay unemployment allowances in the Strip.
 
 

Is een vernederd Israel in Amerika's belang?


Ik kan dit artikel hartgrondig onderschrijven, zoals geldt voor meer artikelen van Ari Shavit.
Het valt te hopen dat het ook in Amerikaanse regeringskringen wordt gelezen.
 
Ik zou er nog aan toe kunnen voegen dat een evenwichtigere houding van de VS de bereidheid tot concessies in zowel Israel als onder de Palestijnen zal vergroten. Juist de eenzijdige focus van de VS (en de rest van de wereld) op de nederzettingen en ander (vermeend) Israelisch onrecht versterkt nationalistische sentimenten in Israel, terwijl die focus de Palestijnen het gevoel geeft dat zij niks hoeven doen en kunnen afwachten totdat de VS Israel dwingt hun eisen in te willigen, zoals Abbas met zoveel woorden in de Washington Post heeft gezegd.

RP
------------

Last update - 04:44 02/07/2009 
Is a crushed Israel in America's best interest? 
By Ari Shavit, Haaretz Correspondent 
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1097244.html
 

Seven months after Barack Obama's victory in the presidential election, it is still not clear what the United States' new strategic goal is: halting Iran's nuclear program, or learning to live with a nuclear Iran? It is also not clear what the new U.S. vision for the Middle East is: a partial but realistic peace, or a full but fictitious peace? It is not clear whether Obama's United States plans to isolate Middle Eastern extremists or encourage them. It is not clear what its attitude toward Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria and Iran will be. Nor is it clear whether it will leave Iraq victorious or defeated. But, on one issue, there is no doubt. In everything related to Israel, Obama's United States has adopted a tough-love strategy.

"Tough love" is a loaded phrase. It has educational, emotional and sometimes even sexual connotations. It encompasses the paternalistic belief that the educator knows what's better for the pupil's welfare than the pupil does. Therefore, it has traditionally been associated with reform schools and patronizing conservatism.

Recently, however, "tough love" has become the rage in liberal circles in Washington and New York. Democratic opinion leaders - many of them Jewish - have begun to speak with shining eyes about the need to administer a dose of tough love to Israel: to train it, wean it, set boundaries for it. To force it against its will to do what is good for it.

Israel, for its part, has done quite a bit to bolster the tough-love advocates. The pampered Israeli-American princess abused its status as the apple of Uncle Sam's eye. For years, it made a mockery of the U.S. administration and embarked on a spree of settlements, checkpoints and illegal outposts. With reckless abandon, it threw off every yoke and waved a red flag at the good and the great in America's capital.

Therefore, when Barack Obama and Rahm Emanuel entered the White House, many people advised them to tame the rebel. And the president and his chief of staff received the advice enthusiastically. To the two tough guys from Chicago, the idea of loving Israel in a strong, painful manner sounded cool.

The results can be seen almost every day on television screens throughout the world: an American policy taken straight out of a British public school. A diplomacy comprised of public reprimands. The new United States is trying to wean Israel from its bad habits by means of the teacher's ruler. Even as it bows and scrapes to Saudi Arabia and is scrupulously careful of Iran's honor, it humiliates Israel. The president's feet on the table were a message. The goal is a well-trained, obedient Israel.

The United States is a superpower. If the United States wants a broken, battered Israel, it will get a broken, battered Israel. This is a collision between a tank and an ATV, between a stealth bomber and a glider. But the question the White House ought to be asking itself is whether riding roughshod over Israel serves its goals - whether a crushed Israel is an American interest.

The answer is unequivocal: no. Already, Israel's public humiliation is hurting America. It is making even moderate Arabs unwilling to contribute anything to advancing the diplomatic process. And without a significant Arab contribution, there will be no diplomatic process.

But a continued tough love policy toward Israel is liable to do damage that is far more serious - and irreversible. Without a strong Israel, a Middle East peace can neither be established nor survive. Without a strong Israel, the Middle East will go up in flames.

Therefore, instead of playing games taken out of a basic training manual, Americans and Israelis must work in harmony. They must think outside the box and come up with a creative solution, based on listening to each other and mutual respect. They must jointly advance a genuine regional peace.

The hour is late. Both Obama's government and Benjamin Netanyahu's government have made serious mistakes the last few months. But ultimately, both Obama and Netanyahu are worthy leaders who want to do the right thing. Therefore, the two must stop the dangerous game they are playing. The time has come to replace tough love with sensible, grown-up love.
 
 

Volgens IDF onderzoek werd meisje in Gaza gedood door Palestijns mortiervuur


Door wie is het meisje gedood? Voor de Palestijnen is zij hoe dan ook een martelaar en het zoveelste symbool van de strijd tegen het wrede en machtige Israel. Voor Israel is dit het zoveelste voorbeeld van hoe Hamas de eigen bevolking in gevaar brengt en daar politiek gewin uit probeert te slaan.
 
RP
-----------


IDF initial probe: Gaza girl killed by Palestinian mortar shells
yaakov katz and jpost.com staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
A 17-year-old Palestinian girl was killed, and five other civilians were wounded on Thursday during a fire exchange between Gaza gunmen and soldiers from an IDF patrol, after the patrol was fired upon near the Nahal Oz Crossing.

Palestinian sources earlier said an IDF tank shell which landed in the central Gaza Strip killed the girl. The sources said at least five people were wounded in the incident.

The military said the troops responded with gunfire and mortar shells, but did not use tanks. It said mortar shells fired by the soldiers landed in open areas in the Gaza Strip.

The army added that all of the mortar shells fired by the Palestinians landed inside the Gaza Strip.

Shortly after the event took place, Hamas announced that the victim was actually a three-year-old girl.

The Hamas claim regarding the victim's age could not be confirmed.

No soldiers were wounded in the attack.

There was no word on whether the gunmen incurred casualties.
 

Joodse heilige boeken vernield in 'ontruimde' nederzetting Homesh


Als Israel deze nederzetting heeft ontruimd, moet het er natuurlijk op toezien dat dat ook zo blijft, en niet toelaten dat in hoekjes en gaatjes van de vernielde huizen toch nog mensen samenkomen, zogenaamd om te studeren. De wet is de wet en de staat moet die handhaven. Nu de Palestijnen hier boeken hebben verbrand proberen de kolonisten van Homesh een symbool te maken van 'verzet'. De regering had dat beter kunnen voorkomen. Uiteraard is de Palestijnse actie op geen enkele wijze goed te keuren, maar de krokodillentranen van de kolonisten zijn hier ongepast.
 
RP & WB
----------------------------


Suspicion: Palestinians burned holy Jewish books at Homesh
Dozens of Talmuds, bibles, prayer books defaced at unauthorized yeshiva located in evacuated West Bank settlement; Minister Edelstein demands permanent structure, adequate protection for Jewish students
 
Efrat Weiss - YNET
 
Police suspect that Palestinians defaced and burned holy books at a yeshiva located on the grounds of the evacuated West Bank settlement of Homesh.
 
"The sight was awful," the yeshiva's dean, Rabbi Elishamah Cohen, told Ynet. "Dozens of holy books - Talmuds, bibles, and prayer books - were almost completely burned."

Police have launched an investigation, but no perpetrators have been detained as of yet.

Homesh was evacuated during Israel's unilateral withdrawal from parts of the West Bank in the summer of 2005. Since then, right-wing activists have made repeated attempts to rebuild the settlement, and every once in a while IDF forces arrive at the site to evacuate them.

About a dozen people have returned to Homesh to live and study in a wooden structure housing a yeshiva. Several weeks ago, security forces destroyed the yeshiva, but students have made use of a remaining courtyard of one of the homes destroyed during the Disengagement.

It is suspected that Palestinians raided the yeshiva while its students were visiting the nearby settlement Shavei Shomron. "It is evident that the Arabs who torched the holy books did so meticulously," said Rabbi Cohen. "The books were almost completely charred. We managed to salvage a few pages."

Yossi Dagan of Homesh First, the grassroots group planning to rebuild the West Bank settlement, said "we demand that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu order the establishment of a large, official settlement in Homesh. This should be the government's response to this national humiliation."

Minister of Information and Diaspora Yuli Edelstein (Likud) called on the government to erect a permanent structure that will house the yeshiva and see to it that the students are protected "so that such severe anti-Semitic incidents will not repeat themselves".
 
 

VS krijgt Arabieren nog niet in beweging voor gebaar richting Israel

 
Achter de schermen is Obama wel degelijk bezig om ook van de Arabische staten dingen gedaan te krijgen, al lijkt de toon wat minder dwingend en eisend te zijn dan naar Israel toe. Sowieso spreekt de VS zich publiekelijk nauwelijks uit over wat de Arabische staten en de Palestijnen moeten doen, en lijkt alleen Israel van alles te moeten. Hopelijk is haar beleid achter de schermen evenwichtiger, wat ook het draagvlak in Israel voor concessies zal vergroten.
 
RP
-----------
 
Israeli source: U.S. can't get Arabs to commit to normalizing Israel ties
By Barak Ravid and Cnaan Liphshiz - Haaretz
Last update - 08:26 02/07/2009
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1097224.html

 
The U.S. administration has not been successful in securing commitments from Arab countries to take steps toward normalizing relations with Israel, a senior source in Jerusalem said Wednesday.

The source said U.S. President Barack Obama's recent meeting with King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia did not produce a commitment to encourage the other Arab states to begin normalization.

"In such a situation, the Americans can't continue demanding gestures only from Israel, such as the demand that Israel freeze settlement construction," the source said.

In response, a senior White House source said talks with the Arab states are continuing with the aim of obtaining a commitment to make gestures toward Israel, and there is still hope for progress.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak returned to Israel on Wednesday from a meeting with U.S. Mideast envoy George Mitchell. A senior White House official confirmed reports that progress was made on the issue of settlements, though no agreement had been reached. He added that similar progress had been made in contacts with Arab countries.

Haaretz has learned that the talks with Mitchell included discussions of a package deal to include a curb on settlement construction. Barak reportedly argued that any steps taken by Israel would have to be accompanied by assurances that the Arab states would also move forward. This would lay the groundwork for resumed talks on a final regional peace agreement.

Within the next two weeks or so, Mitchell is expected to visit Israel to continue talks.

A senior diplomatic source said that even if a meeting between Mitchell and the prime minister doesn't resolve the settlement issue, it will narrow the gap, and the prime minister may request a meeting with Obama in Washington in the coming months to seal an agreement.

Barak noted that if a package deal is reached, Israel might agree to a temporary construction freeze in the settlements, but this would not apply to more than 2,000 housing units already being built.

Also yesterday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke at the traditional Independence Day reception at the residence of the American ambassador, James Cunningham. Netanyahu spoke of shared values with the United States but did not address the settlement issue. Although many senior Israeli politicians attended the event, turnout was lighter than usual.

By attending, Knesset members ignored the call by Likud MK Danny Danon, who wrote a letter to his parliamentary colleagues this week urging them to boycott the event. He said America "was trying to call into question the State of Israel's independence" by pressuring it to halt construction in the West Bank and agree to territorial concessions to the Palestinians.

A senior diplomat said he was puzzled by the logic behind Danon's proposal. He said that despite any disagreements, the event was meant to honor the American people, not any administration.

In his address, Netanyahu highlighted the democratic traditions of Israel and the United States, which he said united them in the face of tyranny. Referring to Obama's recent speech in Cairo, he noted the president's reference to the unbreakable bond between Israel and the United States.

Bassem Eid over het corruptie probleem in de Palestijnse Autoriteit

 
Een ondergesneeuwd onderwerp vanwege de eenzijdige aandacht voor de Israelische nederzettingen: de corruptie in de Palestijnse Autoriteit is nog steeds een groot probleem, en is een van de redenen dat veel Palestijnen geen eigen staat onder dit gezag willen. Voor een functionerende Palestijnse staat is meer nodig dan dat Israel bereid is gebied over te dragen.
 
RP
-----------

The cost of corruption
Jul. 1, 2009
bassem eid , THE JERUSALEM POST
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443695537&pagename=JPArticle%2FShowFull

 
The Palestinian Authority, formed in 1994 in collaboration between the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the government of Israel as a result of the Oslo Accords, controlled the entire area of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip until June 2007. Then Hamas forces took over the Strip, seizing the military facilities controlled by Fatah under Mahmoud Abbas's management, and proceeded to execute officers in the security forces. In response, Abbas dissolved the Palestinian Legislative Council and declared a state of emergency.

Despite this body blow, the corruption of the PA remains as strong as ever, with more new layers constantly revealing themselves to the population at large.

A close friend who recently moved from Gaza City to Ramallah with his wife and two young children told me that the cost of each passport for a Gazan citizen is almost NIS 1,200, as opposed to NIS 235 prior to the Hamas takeover - just one of the consequences of the political disputes between the governments of Hamas in Gaza and Fatah in Ramallah.

After the takeover, several administrative offices had been formed in Gaza whose duties included the distribution of passports to civilians. I can't fathom how these offices transfer the passport requests from Gaza to Ramallah. I do not rule out the possibility that they are in fact smuggled through the tunnels and sent via Egyptian mail to Ramallah.

Today there is a serious passport shortage in the Gaza Strip. The PA, to help remedy that problem, is supposed to pass out about 5,000 new passports every month to citizens in the Gaza Strip. Hamas uses passports by selectively distributing them to the people within its government instead of making them available to anyone applying for them. The lack of passports in Gaza has brought a major increase in demand and even 10,000 new passports issued a month would not be enough to relieve the deficit.

The PA doesn't want to provide the necessary number of passports to the Gaza Strip, since it sees the dearth of passports as a useful tool with which to pressure the Hamas government into returning what it acquired in the takeover.

Hamas, however, is far more worried about regional politics than in the life of the Gaza Strip population.

I WOULD like to add another anecdote to this story: My brother, Hatem Abdulqader, was appointed 40 days ago to be the Minister of Jerusalem Affairs in the Salaam Fayad government. However, his new employer wasn't able to provide him with an office. No one in the government was able to tell my brother to his face that every minister needs a chair, a table and coffee utensils to serve the people who come to his office to congratulate him. When I heard about this, I lent my brother NIS 10,000 to find an office.

Eventually, he had to build one for himself. He had approached the Ministry of Finance many times requesting an office, a chair and a desk, but was told time again that the PA's cash register was empty.

This episode enraged me. Why is it necessity to appoint so many ministers to form a government? Why is the PA in need of $100 million each month for salaries? Where does all this money go? What do all these ministers do for their people?

In the television broadcast showing my brother being sworn in as minister, he raised his hand and swore by the Koran to be loyal to his people and country. If I were him, I would refuse to take this vow in front of Abbas or Fayad. I would be willing to take the oath only when the people standing in front of me are responsible enough to uphold this vow themselves.

The Fayad government actually wanted to use my brother to commit perjury, to swear in front of the entire Palestinian nation in the name of a useless government.

 
The writer is the founder and director of the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group based in east Jerusalem.

Israël en Palestijnen: geef 'ander' niet de schuld

 
Een genuanceerd stuk in de Volkskrant woensdag van Bert de Bruin. Hij ergert zich aan de propagandisten van beide kanten en vraagt zich af hoeveel beide partijen daarmee opschieten, en of zij in feite niet meer schade berokkenen.
 
Zolang te veel buitenstaanders eerder worden geleid door antipathieën dan door sympathieën, voelen de fanatieke Palestijnen en Israëliërs zich in hun gelijk gesterkt en worden de gematigde geluiden – van hen die inzien dat de juiste weg die van dialoog en imperfecte compromissen is – gesmoord.
 
Het zou de Volkskrant en andere kranten sieren als zij ongenuanceerde columnisten a la Anton van Hooff en Thomas von der Dunk op hun eenzijdige en soms ook ophitsende stukken zouden aanspreken, en als zij opiniestukken die vol onjuistheden zitten niet meer zouden publiceren.
 
RP
-------------
 

Geef 'ander' niet de schuld

Bert de Bruin , 01-07-2009 11:46
 
 
De opiniepagina Forum en de opiniesite van de Volkskrant weerspiegelen het soort steun waarop Israël en de Palestijnen kunnen rekenen van de kant van veel betrokken buitenstaanders. Met een zekere regelmaat lezen we artikelen, geschreven door pro-Palestijnse en/of anti-Israëlische sympathisanten en (ex-)politici, waarin opgeroepen wordt om actie tegen Israël te ondernemen.

Het is zonder meer redelijk om de halsstarrige houding van de huidige Israëlische regering zeer kritisch te benaderen, te veroordelen en wellicht te ontmoedigen.

Schuld

Toch valt het steeds weer op dat mensen als Dries van Agt, Thomas von der Dunk, Martijn van Dam en Jack van Ham Israël vrijwel exclusief de schuld toeschrijven. Op een enkele gratuite veroordeling van terreur na, zul je hen zelden of nooit horen toegeven dat niet alleen maar Israël fout bezig is en moet worden terechtgewezen.

Dergelijke artikelen worden dan weer gevolgd door een Pavlov-stuk (op zijn site gebruikt hij zelf de veelzeggende term 'tegenartikel') van 'huiscolumnist' Yochanan Visser, wiens opinie zich niet zelden rechts van de officiële Israëlische lijn bevindt.

Visser probeert aan te tonen hoezeer Van Agt, Van Dam en Van Ham het bij het verkeerde eind hebben, hoe goed de bedoelingen van Israël en hoe slecht de bedoelingen van de Palestijnen zijn, en dat niet Israël, maar de Palestijnen schuldig zijn aan de eeuwige voortduring van het conflict.

Na het lezen van Vissers stukken zou ik soms bijna denken dat de bezetting van de Westoever een zegening is, zo niet voor de gehele mensheid dan toch zeker voor de Palestijnen.

De commentaren bij al deze artikelen – die steevast op honderden reacties kunnen rekenen – laten zien dat de vaste feedbackers vaak nog grotere oogkleppen op hebben dan de schrijvers van de artikelen. Voor zowel de activisten als de online commentatoren geldt: wie bij dit conflict eenmaal partij heeft gekozen, lijkt zich totaal blind te staren op de schuld van de 'andere' partij en het slachtofferschap van zijn 'eigen' kant.

Niemand lijkt in staat of bereid te zijn om in te zien dat zijn 'eigen' partij – Israël dan wel de Palestijnen en/of de Arabische landen (en Iran) – medeschuldig is, grove fouten maakt, mensenrechten schendt, en liters water bij de wijn moet doen om tot een leefbare, vreedzame, onderhandelde oplossing van het conflict te komen.

Lijden
Deze eenogige, fanatieke blindheid wordt helemaal duidelijk zodra er woorden als 'proportionaliteit' vallen.

Nog moeilijker lijkt het om toe te geven dat ook burgers van de 'andere' partij onder het conflict lijden
Zo noemde Thomas von der Dunk ooit het aantal gedode Israëlische burgerslachtoffers 'een verwaarloosbare fractie' van het aantal Palestijnse. Afgezien van de minachting voor alle slachtoffers die daaruit spreekt (ik probeer altijd slachtoffers als mensen te zien, niet als statistieken of nummers), vraag ik me af wat de Palestijnse slachtoffers voor zulk medeleven kopen.

Zoals zoveel oorlogen is ook dit conflict er een van absolute waarheden, van absolute schuld, van ultieme daders tegenover ultieme slachtoffers. Het gelijk van de één schijnt automatisch het ongelijk van de ander te betekenen. Was het allemaal maar zo simpel.

Fout
Natuurlijk, de bezetting en het nederzettingenbeleid zijn fout en onverkoopbaar. De huidige Israëlische regering probeert krampachtig zichzelf en haar bevolking wijs te maken dat de wereld het nederzettingenbeleid uiteindelijk wel zal accepteren. Diezelfde regering negeert en stimuleert, door zich in dat beleid vast te bijten, veel buiten- en binnenlandse gevaren die Israël werkelijk bedreigen.

Dit alles betekent echter niet dat de nederzettingen het enige obstakel op de lange weg naar vrede zijn (de bezetting is voor veel Israëlhaters slechts een excuus, niet de hoofdoorzaak van hun haat), en evenmin dat Israël de enige versjteerder in de regio is. Ook aan de kant van de Palestijnen – en van hun Arabische en Iraanse 'broeders' en broodheren – moet veel veranderen voordat vrede en een Palestijnse staat binnen handbereik komen.

Ik heb het idee dat van alle betrokken buitenstaanders Barack Obama momenteel als een van de weinigen begrijpt dat waar twee al zolang kijven de eeuwige schuldvraag minder belangrijk is dan het vinden van een oplossing waar beide partijen letterlijk mee kunnen leven. Amerikaanse en Europese betrokkenheid is van levensbelang voor wat er over is van het vredesproces.

Queeste
De basis voor zo'n oplossing is er in principe, iedereen weet hoe zo'n oplossing er uiteindelijk zal uitzien. De zogenaamde supporters van deze of gene partij in het conflict kunnen hun 'eigen' partij geen betere dienst bewijzen dan door de zinloze queeste naar absolute schuld, volkomen rechtvaardigheid en perfecte oplossingen op te geven, door in te zien en uit te dragen dat beide volken recht hebben op rust en vrede binnen twee naast elkaar levende staten, en door hun contactpersonen binnen hun 'eigen' partij ervan te overtuigen dat compromissen onvermijdelijk zijn, en dat het gelijk en de rechten van de één niet per se de schuld, het onrecht en het ongelijk van de ander hoeft te betekenen.

Zolang te veel buitenstaanders eerder worden geleid door antipathieën dan door sympathieën, voelen de fanatieke Palestijnen en Israëliërs zich in hun gelijk gesterkt en worden de gematigde geluiden – van hen die inzien dat de juiste weg die van dialoog en imperfecte compromissen is – gesmoord.

=============

Bert de Bruin is historicus. In 1995 emigreerde hij naar Israël. Zijn weblog is te vinden op http://yonathanbert.blogspot.com.
 

IDF legt militaire training op Golan stil om natuur te ontzien


De natuur en het leger, dat gaat niet altijd goed samen, en het ligt voor de hand dat een land dat zo afhankelijk is van een goed getraind leger als Israel het leger voorrang geeft. Toch houdt men ook rekening met de natuur, en wordt op de berg Hermon op de Golanhoogvlakte een maand niet getraind.
 
RP
-----------

Greens delighted as IDF bows to nature's needs on Mount Hermon
By Eli Ashkenazi - Haaretz
 
The Israel Defense Forces canceled all training exercises on the upper reaches of Mount Hermon over the summer, to avoid harming the area's unique flora and fauna. This a critical period for many local species.

"This is a very significant step," said Aviad Blasky, an inspector for the Israel Nature and Parks Authority. "The area above the 1,800-meter line - that is, the very top of the Hermon - is a unique area. In this area, spring is just now ending. Plants have stopped budding and are beginning to dry out and scatter their seed. This is also a critical period for the wildlife. The young reptiles, mammals and birds who have emerged into the world are now learning how to manage on their own."

Yoav Perlman of the Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel says that "the Hermon has a special and sensitive ecosystem, inhabited by unique species that are found nowhere else." An article by Dr. Ori Fragman-Sapir, chief scientist of the Jerusalem Botanical Gardens, listed more than 230 different kinds of plant life alone that are found on the Hermon, but not anywhere else in Israel.

Col. Yehuda Yehohnanov, commander of the Hermon Brigade, said the decision seemed natural to him. "We're a state that has an army, not vice versa," he said. Both the army and nature need the mountain, he explained, so they need to find a way to live together.

Since he took over the brigade, Yehohnanov added, the area's "nature gurus" have infected him with their enthusiasm to such an extent that he now asks all the researchers who come to the area to brief him on their findings.

Because of the area's uniqueness, the Israel Parks and Nature Protection Authority conducted a study to determine when each species breeds and propagates. Based on this study, it defined mid-June to mid-July as the most critical period and so informed the army, at the latter's request.

The army does not conduct a lot of activity on Mount Hermon in any case. Nevertheless, a bullet can cause damage, and so can the very sound of the shots.

"This is noise that definitely drives birds away from their nests," said Blasky. "The nests would be then be left with eggs that are no longer being incubated, or nestlings that would get dehydrated."

Another concern, he said, is that soldiers or vehicles would trample on or run over plants and animals.

After the authority discussed its concerns with the army, the latter agreed to completely shut down training activity for one month.

"This will be a month of complete quiet," Blasky said. "Even planes aren't flying here this month."

Nevertheless, there are some who say even the new arrangement falls short of what is needed.

"Had they consulted us, we would have said that it [the quiet season] needs to start earlier," Perlman said.

Abbas steunt toch nominatie Dode Zee als wereldwonder

 
Een ECHT wereldwonder zou zijn als er na zo'n 100 jaar alsnog vrede en harmonie zou uitbreken in het Midden-Oosten, maar alle beetjes helpen...
 
Wouter
______________________

Palestinians backtrack, support Dead Sea for '7 wonders'
By Haaretz Service
Last update - 17:00 01/07/2009
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1097037.html

 
The Dead Sea will make the list of candidates for the new "Seven Natural Wonders of the World", after Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas agreed Wednesday to support the initiative.

Abbas' support comes less than a week after the Palestinian Authority said it would not support the Dead Sea's candidacy, because it is being sponsored by a West Bank settler council in the Jordan Valley.

The New 7 Wonders of Nature is a global Internet contest under the slogan: "If we want to save anything, we first need to truly appreciate it." In 2007 it chose the new seven man-made wonders of the world.

Its rules state that if a nominee site is located in more than one country, all countries in which it is located must form an Official Supporting Committee (OSC) by July 7.

For the Dead Sea, a win would highlight the environmental threat to a unique lake which has shrunk dramatically in the past 30 years due to human exploitation of the Jordan River feed waters and Dead Sea mineral extraction

Israelisch-Palestijnse onderhandelingen via Facebook en Twitter

 
"Do you know how hard it is for Arabs and Jews to insult each other in only 35 words?"
 
_____________________
 
Is Facebook an Israeli plot to control the world?
Jun. 30, 2009
ray hanania , THE JERUSALEM POST

Why would the Israelis want to control the world when they are having a hard enough time trying to control themselves? Still, it's a question worth pondering especially in the age of the Internet and the rise of the Zionist conspiracy called "Facebook." Let's "faceit," Facebook has a very strong Israeli face. Well, that's if you assume all Jews are Israelis and all Israelis are Jews. The evidence suggests a link.

The founder, Mark Zuckerberg, was born on May 14, 1984. Coincidence? (Hint, Israel's birthday!) And 1984 - the subject of George Orwell's book about the battle to control the world! Zuckerberg is from New York, or, little Israel as Osama bin Laden refers to it. He launched Facebook from his dorm room at Harvard, a scholarly institution controlled by, you know who. No! Not Jews. Presbyterians. (Jews think they control the media, the Arabs believe the Jews control the media and the Presbyterians do control the media. And Presbyterians are not sure who they dislike more, Jews or Arabs.)

Palestinians complain they have an extremely difficult time on Facebook. Do they join the Zionist entity and engage in "normalization" or do they go to the Arab alternative, Berqabook?

I HAVE my own tribulations with Facebook. I have been booted from the worldwide entity twice! Coincidence? The first time, I was writing criticism of the Israeli government. The second time, just this past week, I was writing criticism of the Israeli government. (Actually, I always write criticism of the Israeli government, but so what?) Immediately after and without notice, Facebook shut my account and my 1,363 "friends" vanished off my computer "facescreen" like "born again Christians" scooped up in the rapture. (That's where Evangelical Christian supporters of Israel turn on the Jewish state and read the fine print that if Jews don't convert to Christianity, they get punished like the Muslims.)

I am slowly working my way back from "Ground Zero" and no friends to recovery. I know have 124 "friends as of this writing." What I am learning is that I now have 1,363 people who were once "friends" and who are now angry at me, thinking that I "de-friended" them. Oops! (De-friending someone to a Facebook-nick is like anti-Semitism to a Jew.) About 911 of those former "friends" are Arabs, mostly relatives. (Yes, "Hanania is my last name" has a group on Facebook.) It includes the 15 Saudis whom I don't know but who asked to be my "friend" using a library computer at Guantanamo.

But de-friending 896 relatives and Arabs is the quintessential definition of Jeeeehad! I'll never make my "fourth wife" goal at this rate.

SO I HAVE to slowly re-friend people, one-by-one, cursing my Zionist entity nemesis, "Maaaark Zuuckerberg!" Worse in all this is the jolt to my ego. I went from 1,363 "friends" to zero friends, reminding me that no matter where I live, I am little more than a Palestinian refugee in a harsh and insensitive world of YouTube videos, Twitter and podcasting.

There is something nice about not having people to argue with, though. Yes. In making "friends" on Facebook, you are actually setting yourself up for conflict, which is the dark side of the Facebook experience. The worst thing to do on Facebook is to let your heart do the talking. I've gotten into so many mini-Suez Canal wars with Israelis, but into even more "Black September" battles with Arabs.

The Americans are like "duh!" They friend me, read that I am "Arab" and then say good-bye, explaining they thought I was Puerto Rican. Americans are the most educated people in the world but the least educated about the world. They can't tell the difference between a Palestinian and a Pakistani, an Indian and an Iranian. And a good president and a moron. Well, that was before President Obama, who I love! "Yalla habeeby Barack Hussein! Luuu luuuu luuuu luuuu luuuu!" Give me a gun and I can do that celebratory dance Vanessa Redgrave did so salaciously years ago.

Maybe, though, we should use Facebook as a new forum for negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis. And make them post their views using Twitter, which forces each side to limit their disparaging comments about each side to only 140 characters, including spaces, which comes to about 35 words.

Do you know how hard it is for Arabs and Jews to insult each other in only 35 words? We can only hope. Hey Bibi. Do you want to be my friend?

The writer is a Palestinian American comedian, columnist and Chicago radio talk show host. www.RadioChicagoland.com

Hamas reaktie op toespraken Obama en Netanjahoe


Hamas' gematigde reactie op Obama en Netanjahoe:

Meshaal said Hamas opposed Israel as a Jewish state because that would amount to the denial of the rights of the six million Palestinian refugees.

"The enemy's leaders call for a so-called Jewish state is a racist demand that is no different from calls by Italian Fascists and Hitler's Nazism," Mashaal said.

Emad Gad, political analyst and expert on Palestinain-Israeli conflict said Meshaal's speech represented Hamas's official response to the two previous official speeches from Obama and Netanyahu.

Hamas staat een islamitische Arabische staat voor, maar een Joodse staat daarnaast, nee, dat is toch wel erg racistisch en zelfs fascistisch...
Lees het democratische, humanistische en vredelievende handvest van Hamas.
 
Wouter
_________________


[ Friday, 26 June 2009 ] 

Meshaal calls Israeli government a "fascist" one
Hamas leader calls for action to Obama's words
http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2009/06/26/77050.html

 
CAIRO (Marwa Awad)
Exiled Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal welcomed Thursday the change in tone from Washington towards his Islamist movement but said action was still needed as he hit out on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and called his right-wing government "fascist."

In a televised address from Damascus following United States President Barack Obama's speech in Cairo, Mashaal welcomed Obama's overtures to Hamas as "the first step towards direct talks," but stressed that action as well as unconditional direct talks with Palestinian resistance groups should be the outcome of any outreach.

"Working with Hamas and Palestinian resistance groups, has to be on the basis of respecting the will of the Palestinian people and their democratic choice and not on the basis of placing conditions like that of the Quartet, as imposing conditions on others, is a problematic matter and unsuitable for free nations," Meshaal said.
The Hamas chief added that Obama's stance on halting settlements and the right of Palestinian self-determination needed to move beyond words to concrete gains for Palestinians.

"America's talk today of freezing settlements and of a Palestinian state is not new. More important is the extent of their response to the rights of our people and the reality of the Palestinian state they talk about in terms of its sovereignty," Meshaal explained, adding "that is why our stance on the Obama administration is still under examination."

Hamas has "no illusions about the new policy... we want change on the ground that will bring about an end to the occupation," he said, adding that U.S. must begin to consider Hamas as a resistance movement elected by the will of the people and not an outlawed group.

In his Cairo speech earlier this month, Obama acknowledged the Palestinian support for Hamas but added that the Islamist movement must gain legitimacy by putting an end to violence and recognizing past agreements and "Israel's right to exist."

Israeli stance "fascist"
Underscoring Obama's need for concrete action on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict Meshaal noted that Netenyahu's Tel Aviv speech earlier last week defied U.S. demands for peace in the region by insisting on continuing settlement activity.

Hamas's first outreach move towards the new administration came during Obama's Cairo visit during which former Hamas advisor Yusuf Ahmed submitted a "Peace Letter" which was delivered to Obama by CODEPINK, an advocacy group supporting Palestinians, in hopes of opening dialogue with the world's super power.
Meshaal also slammed Natenyahu's right-wing government, saying that the conditions it placed on the Palestinian statehood were unacceptable and that its demand that Palestinians recognize it as an officially Jewish state is "fascist."

"We reject the position taken by Netanyahu... on east Jerusalem, settlement activity, the right of return of Palestinian refugees and his vision of a demilitarised Palestinian state deprived of sovereignty over its land, air space and territorial waters," Meshaal said.

Meshaal said Hamas opposed Israel as a Jewish state because that would amount to the denial of the rights of the six million Palestinian refugees.

"The enemy's leaders call for a so-called Jewish state is a racist demand that is no different from calls by Italian Fascists and Hitler's Nazism," Mashaal said.

Emad Gad, political analyst and expert on Palestinain-Israeli conflict said Meshaal's speech represented Hamas's official response to the two previous official speeches from Obama and Netanyahu.

"It certainly recaps Hamas's position on the Obama administration and the Israeli government's latest stance in an official response given from Damascus," Gad told Al Arabiya.

Unity Talks
Meshaal also announced the resumption of Palestinian unity talks in Cairo in the coming weeks, stressing the need for unity among Palestinian ranks to topple the occupation and achieve independence.

"Hamas will work swiftly to end the rifts in Palestinian ranks and achieve national reconciliation through talks being brokered by Egypt," Meshaal announced. "To this end, a delegation will travel to Cairo in the next two days to tackle the obstacles," he added.

Egyptian mediators set July 7 as the target date for a deal of reconciliation between Hamas and the West Bank-based leadership of President Mahmoud Abbas after months of irresolute negotiations to mend the rift sparked by Hamas's control of Gaza in 2007.

In recent years Hamas officials have signalled that they may be ready to accept a Palestinian state limited to the territories seized in the 1967 Middle East war despite a commitment in the movement's charter to regaining the whole of historic Palestine.
 
 

donderdag 2 juli 2009

Israel en VN oneens over aantal checkpoints

 
Interessanter dan het geneuzel over timing (Wat maakt dat uit? De VS komen er heus ook wel achter als Israel die uitbreiding een week later had aangekondigd, en zou dan evengoed reageren) is de melding dat het Israelische leger en de VN samen een tour door de Westbank maakten en de checkpoints en roadblocks in kaart brachten. Ze kwamen echter tot verschillende aantallen:
 
The explanation for the discrepancy between the OCHA and IDF numbers has to do with the way one defines a checkpoint. The 14 that the IDF says it maintains in the West Bank are deep inside the territory and could potentially impact Palestinian movement even though they are not manned on a full-time basis.
After removing the 21 roadblocks over the past 18 months, a Palestinian can now travel from Jenin to Hebron without passing even one roadblock or undergoing even one inspection. While some roadblocks remain in the territory, the IDF says they don't have a major impact on Palestinian freedom of movement. At the same time, OC Central Command Maj.-Gen. Gadi Shamni is considering lifting some of the remaining checkpoints.
OCHA, on the other hand, includes unmanned checkpoints in its count. In addition, the OCHA number includes the crossings into Israel, since some of them are located just over the Green Line. The IDF does not count these since they are manned by the Border Police and do not impact Palestinian freedom of movement. There is also the question of OCHA's political motivations and whether its reports are objective. Israel doesn't think they are.
 
De verklaring dat OCHA (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs) ook niet bemenste checkpoints meerekent is in tegenspraak met de bewering eerder in het artikel dat zij 68 bemande checkpoints telt. Idioot dat redacteuren zulke fouten mogen maken. Verder blijft het grotendeels onduidelijk waar het verschillende aantal van beide partijen door is veroorzaakt. Er staan toch geen 54 checkpoints langs de grens van Israel met de Westoever?
 
RP
--------------------

Analysis: Diplomatic faux pas, or calculated message?
Jun. 29, 2009
Yaakov Katz , THE JERUSALEM POST

 

Israel has a thing with timing, particularly around important diplomatic meetings.

In January, 2007, for example, then-prime minister Ehud Olmert flew down to Sharm el-Sheikh for a meeting with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. Shortly before Olmert's plane took off, the IDF launched a rare daytime raid on downtown Ramallah in search of a terror suspect. Pictures of the raid - in which four people were killed and 20 wounded - were broadcast live on Al Jazeera. Needless to say, this was not constructive for the Olmert-Mubarak meeting.

On Monday, timing was again not taken into consideration with the Defense Ministry revealing in a court affidavit it had approved the construction of 50 homes in the West Bank settlement of Adam under a master plan for the Binyamin Region that includes the construction of 1,450 housing units.

The affidavit was filed just hours before Defense Minister Ehud Barak left for New York to meet with the US Special Envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell to discuss America's demand that Israel stop exactly what the Defense Ministry affidavit was approving - continued settlement construction.

There are two possibilities regarding the bad timing in this case. One option is that the court had simply set the date for filing the affidavit without taking any external factors into account. However, one could ask why the Defense Ministry, which knew early last week about Barak's meeting with Mitchell, didn't just ask the court for an extension - something the ministry often does in similar cases.

The second possibility is that the filing of the affidavit as Barak left for the US was done on purpose to send a message to the Obama administration that Israel does not plan to cave in completely to America's demand for a settlement freeze. The construction in Adam is meant to pave the way for the evacuation of the illegal settlement of Migron, which is in itself just as important to the US - if not more so, since the outpost was built on private Palestinian land.

Barak, according to some officials, plans to offer the Americans a three month freeze on construction but will claim Israel needs to allow natural growth to continue, particularly in the settlement blocs.

So while Barak is limited in what he can propose to Mitchell regarding the settlements, he does have some maneuvering room on the issue of freedom of movement in the West Bank, the transfer of security over Palestinian towns to the Palestinian Authority and the evacuation of illegal outposts.

In their meeting, Barak will present Mitchell with a list of the gestures Israel has made to the PA over the past 18 months, including the removal of 21 manned roadblocks in the West Bank. A year-and-a-half ago, there were 35 manned checkpoints. Today, there are 14. The IDF has also removed over 100 dirt mounds that had been placed on roads in the West Bank, effectively blocking Palestinian traffic.

However, according to the Americans there is a lot more that can be done.

According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), there are still 68 manned checkpoints throughout the West Bank, and an additional 24 "partial checkpoints" which are staffed, according to the agency, on an ad-hoc basis. In addition the checkpoints, OCHA claims that there are 521 obstacles in the West Bank - such as earth mounds - that block off Palestinian access to West Bank roads.

What was unique about OCHA's report was that it was the product of a first-of-its-kind joint survey of the West Bank roadblock situation by the UN and the IDF. The joint tour of the West Bank roadblocks was initiated by Col. Benny Shik, the IDF Central Command's chief engineering officer, who is responsible for dismantling the checkpoints.

The explanation for the discrepancy between the OCHA and IDF numbers has to do with the way one defines a checkpoint. The 14 that the IDF says it maintains in the West Bank are deep inside the territory and could potentially impact Palestinian movement even though they are not manned on a full-time basis.

After removing the 21 roadblocks over the past 18 months, a Palestinian can now travel from Jenin to Hebron without passing even one roadblock or undergoing even one inspection. While some roadblocks remain in the territory, the IDF says they don't have a major impact on Palestinian freedom of movement. At the same time, OC Central Command Maj.-Gen. Gadi Shamni is considering lifting some of the remaining checkpoints.

OCHA, on the other hand, includes unmanned checkpoints in its count. In addition, the OCHA number includes the crossings into Israel, since some of them are located just over the Green Line. The IDF does not count these since they are manned by the Border Police and do not impact Palestinian freedom of movement. There is also the question of OCHA's political motivations and whether its reports are objective. Israel doesn't think they are.

The motivation of both sides for conducting the joint tour, though, is clear. The IDF has an interest in getting the word out about the roadblocks it has lifted. At the same time, OCHA has the opportunity to obtain its information from the source, which is in this case the IDF.

Israelische marine onderschept schip op weg naar Gaza


Israel hield dit schip niet tegen omdat het de Gazanen geen humanitaire hulp gunt, maar omdat het niet wil dat Hamas een en ander weer kan uitbuiten voor eigen politiek gewin, en de actievoerders het zelf ook meer om de publiciteit en het aanklagen van Israel is te doen dan om daadwerkelijk de Gazanen te helpen. Bovendien komt humanitaire hulp gewoon binnen via de grensovergangen met Israel. Er is overigens een hele simpele manier voor Hamas om een einde te maken aan de blokkade: Shalit vrijlaten. Ook derden kunnen Hamas daartoe oproepen en het zelf verantwoordelijk houden voor de situatie in Gaza.
 
RP
---------------
 
 
The Israel Navy has prevented a propaganda ship from entering Gaza port. Those who really want to transfer humanitarian aid to Gaza can do so through land crossings. This ship of activists was not interested in helping little children and helpless people, but in making a political point - legitimizing the genocidal Hamas in the name of "human rights." Too bad they will get as much publicity from having the ship intercepted as they would have had had it been allowed to pass. But previous experience shows that the activists who arrive in Gaza are not content to distribute aid, but insist on holding press conferences comparing Israelis to Nazis, which is what their "mission" is really about.
 
 
IDF Navy intercepts Gaza-bound ship
Jun. 30, 2009
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
 
An IDF Navy unit took over a ship that was en route to breaking the naval closure on the Gaza Strip, the IDF said in a statement Tuesday afternoon.
 
Overnight, Navy troops spotted a vessel with a Greek flag, which had embarked on a journey from the port of Larnaca in Cyprus towards the Gaza Strip.
 
After the Navy contacted the ship and realized it was headed to Gaza, the troops clarified that the Strip is under naval closure and that because of security concerns it will not be allowed to reach the beach of Gaza.
 
The ship, named Arion, continued sailing to Gaza despite the Navy's warnings, and after refusing to heed consecutive calls not to sail to the Strip, Navy troops mounted the ship and navigated it to the Ashdod port.
 
The Arion's crew and passengers will be transferred over to relevant authorities, the military statement said.
 
The IDF added that any entity wishing to transfer humanitarian aid can do so through land crossings, after coordinating with the relevant Israeli authorities.
 
 

woensdag 1 juli 2009

Enquete onder Russische immigranten in Israel

 
De integratie van de Russische immigranten in Israel laat nog wat te wensen over, maar zo'n tweederde zou niet meer ergens anders willen leven. Een deel mocht al in de jaren '70 de Sovjetunie verlaten, maar de grote stroom kwam op gang na de ineenstorting van de USSR. Meer dan een miljoen Russen en andere Sovjetburgers van Joodse afkomst en hun verwanten emigreerden naar Israel.
 
Wouter
_______________

Poll of immigrants from former USSR:
64% would choose to live in Israel 15% W. Europe 8% USA 5% Russia if had choice
Dr. Aaron Lerner
Date 30 June 2009

Telephone poll of a sample of 300 Russian speakers from the former Soviet Union carried out in the last days by New Wave and published in Yisrael Hayom on 29 June 2009:

As compared to Israeli culture, is Russian culture higher than it?
Higher 62%
Lower 6%
Same 13%
Don't know 19%

If it were up to you, where would you like to live?
Israel 64%
Western Europe 15%
USA 8%
Russia 5%
Don't know 8%

Do immigrants from the former Soviet Union suffer from discrimination in Israel?
Yes 57%
No 34%
Don't know 9%

What culture would you like your children to be influenced more by?
Russian 43%
Israeli 18%
Both same extent 29%
Don't know 10%

Have you encountered hostility that you associate with your being a Russian speaker?
Yes 41%
No 50%

============
 
Dr. Aaron Lerner, Director IMRA (Independent Media Review & Analysis)
(mail POB 982 Kfar Sava)
Tel 972-9-7604719/Fax 972-3-7255730
INTERNET ADDRESS:
imra@netvision.net.il
Website: http://www.imra.org.il

Nederzettingenbouw gaat door terwijl Barak VS bezoekt

 
De afgelopen jaren zouden er onder Ehud Barak weinig bouwvergunningen zijn afgegeven voor de Israelische nederzettingen, maar het aantal gebouwen schijnt evenals voorheen met 1000 tot 2000 per jaar toegenomen te zijn, wellicht deels zonder vergunning. Dat leid ik af uit de website van Peace Now, die de nederzettingenbouw sinds 1990 in de gaten houdt. Jeruzalem is hierbij niet meegeteld. Alleen over 2007 vind ik zo snel geen cijfers.
 
Zie tevens:
 
Wouter
_______________

Givat Ze'ev expansion highlights Barak's dilemma amid US talks
Tovah Lazaroff and Herb Keinon , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
As Defense Minister Ehud Barak heads to the US to hammer out a deal on settlement construction, the Givat Ze'ev settlement, located just northwest of Jerusalem, is about to experience its largest population boom in at least 10 years, and possibly since its founding in 1983.

Located along Route 443, Givat Ze'ev, which in 2008 had 11,000 residents, has grown by just 700 people in the previous eight years. The growth was fueled mostly by births, as more people left than moved in.

But this year, work is nearing completion on more than 300 homes, authorized under prime minister Ehud Olmert, and the town is waiting for signatures on 380 more, which Olmert had also said would be approved.

The town should grow by about 1,000 people in 2009 - the kind of growth previously seen only in the largest settlement cities of Modi'in Illit, with a population of 41,700, Betar Illit with 34,700 and Ma'aleh Adumim with 33,800.

A "settlement freeze" that would suspend all construction would heavily impact Givat Ze'ev and these other large settlements that routinely build several hundred apartments a year. In Modi'in Illit in 2008, for example, work was begun on 600 apartments.

On Sunday, Givat Ze'ev Council head Yossi Avrahami said he feared "we will have to fight for the 380" apartment units that need final approval, even as he expressed confidence that the remainder of the construction authorized in his settlement would continue, no matter what happened in the US.

Barak is scheduled to meet in New York on Monday with US Mideast envoy George Mitchell to hammer out an agreement on the issue.

Barak on Sunday denied reports that Israel had decided to freeze all Jewish building in the West Bank for three months, including for natural growth, saying there had been no agreement on this yet in Jerusalem.

"The relations and understandings with the US are very important to Israel," Barak said prior to Sunday's cabinet meeting, adding that Israel supported regional peace initiatives which include negotiations with the Palestinians.

But the Palestinian Authority has conditioned negotiations with Israel on a total settlement freeze, something that has never happened since the first settlement, Kibbutz Kfar Etzion, was founded 42 yeas ago.

Barak said that this issue, which he called "the issue in the headlines," had not been fully agreed upon in Israel.

"As I already said, the issue in the headlines has not been agreed upon, and it is clear that among the range of issues with the Americans regarding the regional situation - the agreement with the Palestinians, the chances of an agreement with the Syrians, the hope that this will yield an agreement also with Lebanon - all these things are still in the early stages and are very important to us, and will all be discussed," he said. "But the issue itself as was presented in the headlines is an issue that has not been agreed upon."

Yediot Aharonot reported on Sunday that Barak would recommend a settlement freeze for three months to restart the negotiations with the PA.

Barak - according to the paper - will also tell the Americans that Israel does plan to continue finishing building some 2,000 housing units that are in advanced stages of construction.

Among the items expected to be on the agenda in the discussions with the Americans are how to define a settlement freeze, at what stage construction would be stopped, and beyond what stage of construction would houses be allowed to be completed.

The report struck a nerve in both Givat Ze'ev and Ma'aleh Adumim, both places where the Likud garnered more votes than any other party in February's national election.

It's not the first time in the current government's short history that it and settler leaders have been at odds.

Since Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's return from Washington last month, settler leaders have said they fear he would not authorize any new construction permits in Judea and Samaria, including in the large settlement cities situated close to the Green Line where the bulk of settlement growth has occurred in the past decade.

No building permits have been authorized anywhere in the West Bank since November.

On Sunday, settler leaders scrambled to verify reports of a freeze on ongoing construction, even as they said they did not believe such a step was possible.

"There is a strong majority within the coalition and within the government, Defense Ministry and the Prime Minister's Office that opposes even a temporary freeze," said Dani Dayan, who heads the Council of Jewish Communities of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip.

In Ma'aleh Adumim, where workers are building some 400 apartments, Mayor Benny Kashriel, who is a member of the Likud Central Committee, said he had tried with no success to verify the media reports.

"It would go against promises Netanyahu made both before and right after the elections," Kashriel said.

He promised that if the reports were true, Netanyahu could expect vigorous opposition both from within the Likud and on the part of settler leaders.

He added that there were technical difficulties with freezing ongoing construction that involved breaking contracts with contractors and buyers who had already purchased apartments. Kashriel warned that court cases would quickly be opened in response to any deal to freeze construction that Barak might work out.

When one drives through Givat Ze'ev one can see that work is almost completed on some 250 apartments in a new haredi neighborhood, in a settlement that has a broad population mix, from secular to modern Orthodox and haredi. Another 80 units are expected to be completed soon after in the project, which is known as Agan Ha'ayalot.

At issue for Givat Ze'ev is the remaining 380 apartments, which Olmert promised would be authorized, but for which final signatures are pending, according to Avrahami.

The project, which was initially authorized in 1999, was frozen in 2000, at the start of the second intifada, when violence along Route 443 that leads to Givat Ze'ev made it hard to attract investors and buyers. Olmert allowed the project to move forward in 2008, after contractors who had found new investors and buyers by targeting the haredi market sued the state.

Also under construction in Givat Ze'ev are several hundred additional apartments authorized under Olmert, of which at least 100 are expected to be finished this year.

Following Sunday's cabinet meeting, Netanyahu met together with Barak, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and Likud Ministers Dan Meridor and Bennie Begin to discuss the upcoming Barak-Mitchell meeting.

Netanyahu, who postponed a meeting with Mitchell last Thursday in Paris, is expected to meet with the envoy once the settlements issue is ironed out.

One diplomatic official noted that it was telling that Barak, not Lieberman, who was leading the negotiations with the US on this matter, a stark contrast to when Tzipi Livni was foreign minister and was closely involved in the discussions with the US.

The official said it was not clear whether the US preferred dealing with Barak rather than Lieberman; whether Netanyahu was keen on distancing Lieberman from this issue because of the foreign minister's uncompromising position on the matter; or whether the Israel Beiteinu chairman himself did not want to get involved in the settlement issue so he would not eventually be seen as one of the architects of a policy opposed by most of his party's constituents.

Zes aanhangers Mousavi in Iran zouden opgehangen zijn

 
De onrust in Iran lijkt nog verre van over. Curieus genoeg zijn er zelfs 'linkse' Nederlanders die menen dat Mousavi maar beperkte steun heeft van vooral een bevoorrechte elite in de steden en van de CIA, die met een zak geld nog door de regering Bush toegekend het Iraanse regime ondermijnt. Hoe faut kun je zijn?
 
Wouter
________________
 
 
6 Mousavi supporters reportedly hanged
Jul. 1, 2009
SABINA AMIDI, Special to The Jerusalem Post , THE JERUSALEM POST

 

As the Iranian authorities warned the opposition on Tuesday that they would tolerate no further protests over the disputed June 12 presidential elections, a report emerged of the hangings of six supporters of defeated candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi.

Speaking after Iran's top legislative body upheld the election victory of incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, sources in Iran told this reporter in a telephone interview that the hangings took place in the holy city of Mashhad on Monday. There was no independent confirmation of the report.

Underlining the climate of fear among direct and even indirect supporters of Mousavi's campaign for the election to be annulled, the sources also reported that a prominent cleric gave a speech to opposition protesters in Teheran earlier this week in which he publicly acknowledged that the very act of speaking at the gathering would likely cost him his life.

"Ayatollah Hadi Gafouri said that the Imam [Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini] never wanted [current supreme Leader] Ali Khamenei to succeed him. He even went to say that the Islamic republic died the day the Imam did," one source said.

Other criticisms from senior clerics over the regime's handling of the elections and subsequent protests included a report from a Persian news agency, which on Tuesday quoted a senior cleric from the city of Esfahan, Ayatollah Seyyed Jalaleddin Taheri-Esfahani, defending Mousavi against the regime's criticisms.

The ayatollah was quoted as saying: "Is it a case of justice to see that an honorable and modest Seyyed [a descendant of the household of the prophet Muhammad], who until the last moments of Khomeini's life was a dear and close companion of that grand leader, is now considered to be a rioter and an agent of arrogance who must be punished?"

On Monday, witnesses said thousands of policemen and Basij militiamen carrying batons were deployed in Teheran's main squares to prevent any recurrence of the opposition protests. Drivers who so much as shouted "Allahu Akbar" or beeped their horns had their windows smashed by the Basiji and riot police.

Women police, better known as the Sisters of Zeynab, are also now out in force, the witnesses said.

"Some people are still going out into the streets, but there is despair and sadness," said one source. "Now we are told that [pro-Mousavi] green bands are illegal, which is ironic because it symbolizes the color of Islam."

On Monday, the daughter of former president Hashemi Rafsanjani, spoke a gathering of opposition protesters in Teheran's Enqelab Square, sources said. "Mrs. Faezeh Hashemi arrived and tried to give the people some words of encouragement," said one, "but the police broke up the rally within minutes."

He added, "My nephew saw one of these Sisters of Zeynab beat down an elderly woman with no mercy. When he tried to intervene, saying to her, 'Miss, she is like your grandmother,' the woman turned around to get a Basiji to deal with him."

Mousavi's Facebook page is still carrying messages aimed at quashing the notion that he is caving in. "He did not give in to the Guardians Council," runs one new message. "Mir Hossein Mousavi is not under house arrest, he is not about to leave the country, he is under strong pressure to end this, but he always said he will stand up for the people's will to the end! He is from and with the people."

Amid the talk of despair and quashed protests, one defiant reformist supporter told this reporter: "The regime wants the world to think they have won. Don't believe it... Even if this regime is about to collapse, they would not let anybody know until their final hour."

 

dinsdag 30 juni 2009

Israel-PA onderhandelingen vast door focus Obama op nederzettingen

 
Ironically, this state of no-negotiations is good and comfortable for PA President Mahmoud Abbas. He is not interested in negotiating with Netanyahu, figuring - probably rightly so - that he is not going to get more from the Likud prime minister than he got from former prime minister Ehud Olmert, who was willing to cede more than 93 percent of the West Bank, make up for the rest with a land swap, and relinquish Israel's claim over the holy basin in Jerusalem.
 
Het lijkt erop dat de eenzijdige kritiek en druk uit de internationale gemeenschap en de VS, de Palestijnse positie hebben verhard. Zij leunen lekker achterover en wachten af totdat Israel eenzijdig allerlei concessies heeft gedaan, zonder dat zij daar iets tegenover hoeven te stellen. In tegenstelling tot Herb Keinon denk ik dat de VS er wel voor kan zorgen dat Israel de bouw in de nederzettingen stopt, ook in Oost-Jeruzalem, maar het is zeer de vraag of dat vrede een stap dichterbij brengt. Het zou vruchtbaarder zijn als de VS beide partijen ertoe kan aanzetten concessies te doen, niet zozeer voor Obama, maar om de kansen op vrede te vergroten en goodwill naar de ander te tonen.
 
RP
-------------
 
Analysis: Obama's settlement focus handcuffing negotiations
Jun. 25, 2009
Herb Keinon , THE JERUSALEM POST
 

With Defense Minister Ehud Barak scheduled to fly back to Washington on Monday for another round of talks about construction in the settlements, it is instructive to ask at this point what exactly US President Barack Obama is trying to achieve by pushing Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to the wall on this issue.

If, as some maintain, it's a way to build his credentials in the Arab world, then - okay - the policy can be understood. US and European diplomats say continuously that everywhere they travel in the Arab world, settlement construction is the one issue that they hear about time and time again: that construction in the settlements is poisoning the atmosphere and that Obama's seriousness in charting a new policy with the Arab world will be judged in no small degree by how he deals with Israel on this issue.

And, as has been said ad nauseam, Obama wants the Arab world. He wants the Arab world to help him out of Iraq and the worsening quagmire in Afghanistan, and also in dealing with Iran -- though the international community's policy toward Iran is likely to undergo a drastic reassessment following the schisms within Iranian society that are now out there for everyone to see.

One can argue that it is ludicrous to link settlements with Syria's sealing its borders with Iraq, or getting the United Arab Emirates to reduce its booming business with Teheran, but the link is continuously being drawn, and Obama wants to remove this particular coal from the fire.

But if Obama is being so forceful on the settlements out of a belief that this will push the negotiation process forward, then he is mistaken.

Whether this was Obama's intention or not, his hard line on the settlements has effectively made Israeli-Palestinian negotiations dependent on a complete settlement freeze, something the Netanyahu government - because of its political makeup and Netanyahu's desire for political longevity - is simply not going to do.

So here is the status report so far on the Obama administration's settlement policy: The US has strongly called for a complete settlement freeze, Netanyahu has made clear that he will not comply and the Palestinians say that they will not begin negotiating until one is in place.

The bottom line: there will be no negotiations.

Ironically, this state of no-negotiations is good and comfortable for PA President Mahmoud Abbas. He is not interested in negotiating with Netanyahu, figuring - probably rightly so - that he is not going to get more from the Likud prime minister than he got from former prime minister Ehud Olmert, who was willing to cede more than 93 percent of the West Bank, make up for the rest with a land swap, and relinquish Israel's claim over the holy basin in Jerusalem.

Abbas turned down Olmert's offer, telling The Washington Post that the gaps were too wide. He is probably reasoning that those gaps aren't going to narrow under Netanyahu, so why negotiate?

And Obama has now given him an excuse not to.

This state of no-negotiations might serve Netanyahu's purpose as well, at least if one believes his critics, who argue that the prime minister really doesn't think it is possible to reach an agreement with the Palestinians, and that all he is doing now is posturing.

Netanyahu has made clear that he will not agree to a complete freeze. He has said that he won't build any new settlements, or expropriate any new land, but he won't freeze construction for natural growth.

First of all, it is not clear whether he legally has the power to do so. How do you stop building an apartment that is 75% complete? What about contractual obligations? What about money invested?

Secondly, even if Netanyahu could wave his wand and magically stop everything right now, politically he can't. With Israel Beiteinu's Avigdor Lieberman breathing down his neck, the prime minister is not going to do something that most Israelis, according to the recent polls, don't even think he should do - stop natural growth construction in the large settlement blocs.

If Obama thinks that by pressing this issue real hard, the Israeli public will revolt against Netanyahu, or that Netanyahu will go gently into the good political night, then he is misreading both the public and Netanyahu. Netanyahu, currently flirting with Kadima's Shaul Mofaz, will not be felled so easily.

Interestingly enough, last week two former Washington insiders heavily involved over the years in Middle East issues - Aaron David Miller, the 1990s Middle East negotiator from the Left, and Elliott Abrams, the former deputy national security advisor from the Right - addressed a group in Washington and both said the Obama administration's focus on the settlements was a mistake.

Abrams, for his part, said he did not understand Obama's apparent decision "to take the position that Israel is the problem." And, indeed, making the settlements the issue takes all the onus off the Palestinians.

And as far as Miller was concerned, the JTA quoted him as saying that "as legitimate a problem as settlements are with respect to undermining the environment toward a negotiation," they are a "distraction" given all the other problems that need to be addressed.

"Given the stakes and reality, we are going to need a relationship with Israel of great intimacy in order to do this. We need to think very carefully about how we're going about it, where is the strategy, what is the objective," said Miller, no fan of the settlement enterprise.

And, indeed, if the US objective is to get negotiations started, then the Obama administration's policy of making the settlements its main focus is proving counterproductive.

Zweden subsidiëert pro-Palestijnse NGO's die het conflict aanwakkeren

 
Veel Palestijnse en pro-Palestijnse niet-gouvernementele organisaties geven Israel en de bezetting de schuld van vrijwel alle problemen die de Palestijnen teisteren, en dat zijn er nogal wat. Toch richten zij zich niet op dialoog, verzoening en vrede tussen de twee partijen, maar voeren eenzijdige en vaak opruiende campagnes tegen Israel, van boycot initiatieven tot strafrechtelijke vervolging van Israelische politici en militairen. Dergelijke NGO's worden niet alleen door Zweden gesteund maar ook door andere Westerse landen waaronder Nederland.
 
Gelukkig zijn er ook NGO's die zich wel oprecht richten op dialoog en verzoening, en krijgen die vaak eveneens Westerse steun.
Een aantal daarvan staan genoemd in het artikel Initiatieven voor vrede en verzoening.
 
Stom genoeg werken verschillende gesubsidiëerde NGO's elkaar tegen, en worden dialoog- en samenwerkingsprojecten verketterd door de radikalere pro-Palestijnse NGO's die een boycot van Israel voorstaan. Het Westen zou er beter aan doen om kritisch te kijken naar wie en wat ze ondersteunen met ons belastinggeld...
 
Wouter
______________
 
 
A Clouded EU Presidency: Swedish Funding for NGO Rejectionism
NGO Monitor
June 29, 2009

[For annotated version:
www.ngo-monitor.org/article/a_clouded_eu_presidency_swedish_funding_for_radical_ngos  ]

 
On July 1, 2009, Sweden will assume the presidency of the European Union. This report shows that in order to have a positive impact on Arab-Israeli peace efforts, Sweden cannot continue to fund radical pro-Palestinian NGOs.

Swedish government funding for NGO activities under the guise of human rights and humanitarian aid is biased, highly political, and the details are often hidden.
Many NGOs receive significant Swedish support from multiple sources: directly from the SIDA aid agency, via NDC (Ramallah), and from Swedish "framework" NGOs. Some groups also receive funding from the EU's European Commission.

There is no evidence of a detailed study to determine whether this money given to NGOs has accomplished any of the stated objectives.

Sweden funds Diakonia's International Humanitarian Law project, which promotes Palestinian political goals through a distorted and misleading interpretation of international law.

Sweden also funded Sabeel's Nakba Memory program in 2008 "to commemorate the Nakba [Catastrophe] of 1948, examine the current struggles for freedom, equality, and identity, and confront the continuing problems of the 1948 refugees."

Sweden is a main supporter of the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) - a leader in the NGO "lawfare" strategy of exploiting the universal jurisdiction to bring cases against Israeli officials alleging "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity." Such activities fuel the conflict.

The Palme Center falsely accuses Israel of "provok[ing] the al-Aqsa rising and the 'Second Intifada,'" and "disproportionate violence against civilians, unlawful executions and torture." The fighting in Gaza is also blamed on "the provocative Israeli occupation."

Other SIDA grantees, including the Alternative Information Center (AIC), Women's Affairs Technical Committee (WATC), Palestinian Medical Relief Society (PMRS), and Jerusalem Center for Women (JWC), demonize Israel with the rhetoric of "apartheid," "ethnic cleansing," and "massacres."
 
Background:

The Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) has been providing substantial aid to Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza since 2000. In 2008, these areas received SEK 455 million (~$59 million, over 70% of the Middle East and North Africa [MENA] budget). In 2007, they were the 7th highest recipient of SIDA funding in the world (out of SEK 15.4 billion worldwide; complete figures for 2008 are not yet available).

Through this funding, SIDA claims "to promote democracy and respect for human rights, especially in terms of equality," and to "create opportunities for a peaceful solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and contribute to a democratic Palestinian state governed by law." Sweden also provides "expert assistance to help strengthen the PLO's negotiating structures to enable it to be an equal partner in the peace negotiations with Israel," clearly taking the Palestinian position in the process.

SIDA's website also asserts that funding for joint Israeli and Palestinian human rights campaigns "has helped to increase public support for a peaceful solution in both Israel and Palestine." However, no evidence is provided for this questionable claim.

Funding Mechanisms:
 
Swedish, Israeli, Palestinian, and international NGOs are funded by the Swedish government through three mechanisms: Grants channeled through Swedish NGOs; a multi-national framework, the NGO Development Corporation (NDC), which includes money from Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark, and the Netherlands; direct funding to "organizations in partner countries."
 
Overlap between these schemes is not uncommon, as shown below, suggesting a lack of responsible oversight by the Swedish government. Additionally, while SIDA maintains a database on the indirect support through Swedish groups, the NDC project and direct grants to local NGOs are not included.  Due to this limited transparency, the information available to members of parliament, policy makers, and others, as well as the listings below, may not be comprehensive.
 
Grants channeled through Swedish NGOs
 
"Most of the [SIDA] support to the MENA region" is channeled through 14 Swedish "framework organizations," including Diakonia, the Swedish Mission Council (SMR), the Olof Palme International Center (OPC) and Save the Children Sweden (Radda Barnen). These groups are responsible for transferring SIDA funds to local NGOs and overseeing project implementation.
Additionally, the framework organizations provide the information contained in the SIDA database, but   the material is often inconsistent or missing. For instance, the "local implementing organisation(s)" is sometimes listed anonymously as "local NGO."
Data in this section is from the SIDA database, unless otherwise noted.

1. Diakonia funding for NGOs
 
In 2008 and 2009, SIDA allocated over SEK 100 million annually to Diakonia, a self-described "Christian development organization" and Sweden's largest humanitarian NGO. Diakonia oversees four projects in "Israel/Palestine". Two of its programs, the Children's Literature Program (18 million SEK from 2005-07) and the Rehabilitation Program (25 million SEK from 2008-09), appear to be genuine humanitarian projects. The bulk of Diakonia's funding from SIDA, however, is spent on Civil Society Organizations (13.5 million SEK from 2008-10) and the International Humanitarian Law (IHL) (46.4 million SEK from 2006-09) programs (figures provided by Diakonia).  The IHL program was created to influence public opinion, and presents a distorted and misleading interpretation of international law that promotes Palestinian political goals, such as "lawfare" against Israeli officials and foreign corporations doing business with Israel. This project primarily disseminates the Palestinian narrative.
 
Diakonia perpetuates the conflict through a paternalistic attitude toward Palestinian responsibility, blaming Israel for the failings of the Palestinian Authority: "[due to] the occupation and lack of peace in Palestine, it is not difficult to grasp the negligence of the Palestinian Government to implement the law of Disability eight years after it has been endorsed."
 
Many of Diakonia's partner organizations - Al Mezan, Al Haq, the Alternative Information Center, Sabeel, and others - are among the most extreme anti-Israel NGOs, erasing the context of terror, and employing inflammatory and at times, even antisemitic rhetoric. (For a detailed analysis see NGO Monitor, Diakonia: Exploiting International Law to Promote the Palestinian Cause, forthcoming July 2009.)
 
Alternative Information Center (AIC) 2004 - 2008. SEK 295,650 in 2008. AIC refers to the "Israeli occupation-regime" and the Arab-Israeli "colonial conflict." AIC is against normalization with Israel, claiming that the collaboration of a Palestinian NGO with the Israeli Peres Center for Peace "is politically unacceptable, and morally disgusting. Shimon Peres is definitely an enemy of the Palestinian people, of human rights and of  peace."  AIC officials participate in United Nations frameworks; have accused Israel of "genocide," a "policy of ethnic cleansing," and "apartheid"; and have also compared Israeli military and political officials to Nazis. (See AIC Profile, NGO Monitor, June 4, 2009)
 
Al Haq - Received SEK 3.2 million between 2006 - 2010, as part of Diakonia's IHL program (also funded by NDC - see below). Al Haq is a leader of the "lawfare" movement, initiating lawsuits in Canada and the UK, and preparing "ready-to-be-used case files" for use against Israeli officials in foreign courts. Al Haq lists boycotts among its goals and objectives, and lobbied the EU to annul the upgrade of EU-Israel bilateral relations. General Director Shawan Jabarin has been denied exit visas by Israel and Jordan on account of his alleged ties to the Popular Front for Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terror group. Co-founder Charles Shamas is a member of the Middle East-North Africa advisory board of Human Rights Watch, and has "advised the PLO/PNA on IHL-related diplomacy," and publically compares Israeli policy to "apartheid" and "genocide."
 
Sabeel 2006 - 2008. One 2008 Sabeel project, "The Nakba Memory, Reality and Beyond," used SIDA funding (SEK 540,000) "to commemorate the Nakba of 1948, examine the current struggles for freedom, equality, and identity, and confront the continuing problems of the 1948 refugees"; "create a better understanding of the history of 1948, the Palestinian Nakba (Catastrophe)"; and "create a stronger civil society informed and concerned about the Nakba and who will work proactively inside Israel.on.the situation of second class citizenship for Palestinians." This rhetoric supports Palestinian rejection of compromise, and works against the peace process that the Swedish government claims to support. Sabeel is a leader of the church divestment campaign, and director Naim Ateek employs antisemitic themes and imagery in sermons promoting his "Palestinian Liberation Theology."
 
Physicians for Human Rights - Israel (PHR-I) 2004 - 2008. SIDA contributed SEK 462,281 in 2008 and SEK 457,200 in 2009 to a two-year PHR-I project entitled "The Occupied Palestinian Territory, Prisoners & Detainees" claiming to "Protect the right to health of Palestinian in the Occupied Territories: Protect[] medical neutrality and the safety of medical premises and staff in the occupied territories, [and] Protect[] freedom of movement (access to health) of Palestinian patients, medical personnel and medical goods and conducting local and international advocacy." PHR-I campaigns include the unsupported claim that Israel is required to provide "free access to health services" in the Palestinian Authority, and that Israel is responsible for the PA's decision to suspend payments for Palestinian patients in Israeli hospitals. This political NGO is also lobbying against the upgrade of EU-Israel relations.
 
Women's Affairs Technical Committee (WATC) 2004 - 2008. Received SEK 113,959 in 2008. WATC's plainly stated ideology is that "the social struggle for the full emancipation of all members of the Palestinian society...must go hand in hand with the national struggle for the liberation of Palestine." A WATC newsletter asserts that "[t]he Israeli occupation has continued building its wall of apartheid and segregation." In a letter entitled "Stop Israeli Massacres and the Zionist aggressions on the Gaza Strip immediately," WATC irresponsibly labeled the Gaza conflict "a war of extermination."
 
Harvard's Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research (HPCR), "IHL in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory" - SEK 2.8 million in 2006 - 2010. SIDA, via Diakonia, funds HPCR International's Humanitarian Policy & Law Forum, operated in conjunction with Harvard University's School of Public Health.  The IHL component was developed "in consultation" with the UN, and aims "to improve access to balanced information on international law and to promote the integration of legal and humanitarian analysis in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Roadmap framework."  In reality, this program promotes the Palestinian agenda behind an academic façade, based on a distortion and manipulation of international law.  Its "web portal" contains "policy briefs" that claim to "analyze" IHL on certain aspects of the Arab-Israeli conflict, yet invariably conclude that Israel is violating international law.  The forum is also a major promoter of the non-serious argument that Gaza remains "occupied" after the Disengagement. (For a detailed analysis, see NGO Monitor's report on this program forthcoming July 2009.)
 
Other NGOs funded by SIDA-Diakonia include: B'Tselem and Al Mezan (see below), the "Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign" (implemented by Health Work Committees) and "Research Study Mental Health Effects of the Apartheid Wall on Pales[tinians]" (implemented by Arab Center for Counseling and Education).

2.  Swedish Mission Council (SMR) funding for NGOs
 
Palestinian Medical Relief Society (PMRS) SEK 97,461 in 2008. PMRS uses loaded language to delegitimize Israel and perpetuate distrust. The president of the PMRS, Dr. Mustafa Barghouthi, referred to the Gaza conflict as a "horrendous massacre," and used terms like "ghetto", and "apartheid" rhetoric on a radio program.  PMRS refers to the security barrier as the "apartheid Wall," and claimed that Israel employs a "racist ideology" and inflicts "collective punishment" on the Palestinians. All of these activities in support of the Palestinian position are inconsistent with the foundations of compromise and peace.

3. Olof Palme International Center (OPC) funding for NGOs
 
The Palme Center, established in 1992 by the Swedish Social Democratic Party and trade unions, promotes an overwhelmingly Palestinian narrative of the conflict. The Palme Center makes the absurd statement accusing Israel of "provok[ing] the al-Aqsa rising and the "Second Intifada," "contribut[ing] to a chaotic security situation" in Gaza following the Disengagement, and "disproportionate violence against civilians, unlawful executions and torture." Only "Israeli attacks" are mentioned; Palestinian violence, including thousands of rocket attacks and internal violence, is ignored and accepted. The fighting in Gaza is also blamed on "the provocative Israeli occupation" alone.
 
Jerusalem Center for Women (JWC) 2006 - 2009. Over SEK 690,000 in 2008-9. JWC claims "to stand against to the unjust occupation, oppression, war, apartheid, humiliation, and poverty affecting Palestinian women." A "fact sheet" refers to Israeli "illegal[] evict[ion]" of Palestinian families "so that settlers can take up residency," and refers to the "Annexation wall." JWC designed posters with provocative slogans, such as "Ethnic Cleansing in East Jerusalem," "Stop the Apartheid Wall," and "Stop the Judaization of Jerusalem."

4. Save the Children Sweden - Radda Barnen (SCS) funding for NGOs
 
Defense for Children International - Palestine Section (DCI-PS) 2004 - 2009. DCI-PS regularly exploits the rhetoric of children's rights, manipulates international law, and campaigns against Israel in the UN and other international frameworks. For example, in a statement to the Committee on the Rights of the Child (September 29, 2007) DCI/PS condemned Israel for "deliberate targeting of civilians" in Lebanon, "terrorizing the civilian population" in Gaza and "collective punishment." DCI-PS endorsed the call for BDS against Israel, and refers to Israeli "racism," promotes the Palestinian narrative of "nakba" and the "right of return" as "a natural and legal right."  Swedish government funding for these activities fuel the conflict and constitute a major obstacle to peace.
 
Addameer (Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association) 2009. Addameer refers to the Israeli army as the "Israeli Occupying Forces," and accuses Israel of "collective punishment" and a "policy of using Palestinian prisoners as pawns to achieve political and military gains."  Addameer endorsed the call for BDS against Israel, which calls for "[e]nding [Israel']s occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall," and compares Israel to apartheid South Africa, in a manner consistent with the Durban Strategy of anti-Israel demonization and the use of soft-power warfare.

5. NDC funding for NGOs
 
In July 2008, the NGO Development Center (NDC - Ramallah) received $6 million from the governments of Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark, and the Netherlands. NDC in  turn, distributed these funds to 25 Israeli and Palestinian NGOs, using tax money to support the inherently biased criteria of "organizations that monitor, document and report on violations by the Israeli military occupation of Palestinian human rights" and the potential for "lawfare" - "legal representations and litigation related to individual cases of human rights violations" (pg. 3). No information on the level of oversight (if any) by Sweden and the other donor countries could be found.
NDC "facilitated" and funded the "Palestinian NGO Code of Conduct," a document that rejects "any normalization activities with the occupier, neither at the political-security nor the cultural or developmental levels. No endeavor would be carried out if it undermines the inalienable Palestinian rights of establishing statehood and the return of the refugees to their original homes."
 
NDC funding recipients include:
Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) - $400,000. PCHR regularly refers to rocket attacks on Israeli civilians as "resistance." Following the deaths of five children in a "work accident" (during the preparation of an explosive device) the NGO condemned "the danger of storage of explosives in residential areas by Palestinian resistance groups," and suggested that "IOF are involving through planting a booby-trapped explosive device inside the house" (sic). PCHR is also a leader in the "lawfare" strategy of exploiting the universal jurisdiction statutes in democratic countries in order to bring cases against Israeli political and military officials for "war  crimes" and "crimes against humanity." During the Gaza war, this NGO published accusations of Israeli "collective punishment" and "indiscriminate killing and continued systematic destruction of all the Palestinian institutions and civilian facilities in the Gaza Strip," and blamed the "international donor" community for "bankrolling the occupation" and of "complicity in Israeli violations of international law." In 2007, PCHR listed SIDA as a funder (pg. 6), but not in 2008 when it received NDC support. There is no indication of any assessment by the Swedish government regarding the benefits resulting from the funds provided to PCHR.
 
Al Haq - $500,000. See above.
 
Al Mezan - $500,000. Al Mezan claims "[t]o protect, respect and promote the internationally accepted standards of human rights." However, its activities and reports indicate that this NGO's main activities are focused on political campaigns directed against Israel, rather than on promoting universal not human rights. Al Mezan consistently refers to the Israeli army as the Israel Occupation Forces (IOF), erasing the context of Palestinian terror, and delegitimizing Israeli self-defense. Al Mezan promotes allegations of "Israeli massacres," "slaughtering civilians," "scandalous war crimes," and "despicable disregard to civilian life," and fails to condemn Hamas' use of human shields and illegal rocket attacks against Israeli civilians.
 
Badil -$100,000. Badil is a leading actor in the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel, and has called for a "targeted campaign to expose the lies of AIPAC and the Anti-Defamation League and to expose the Jewish and Zionist community's double standards regarding Nakba & Occupation." Badil has also referred to "Israel's colonial apartheid  regime," "state-sponsored racism," and "systematic ethnic cleansing," and claims that "[i]nstitutionalized racism and discrimination" is the "root cause.of the ongoing internal forcible displacement and dispossession of the Palestinian people."
 
Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Center (JLAC - Mossada) - $165,000. JLAC claims to "[d]efend[] the Palestinian victims of human rights violations; with accordance to the Palestinian laws and the international law.via legal aid and legal representation".  JLAC published a report entitled, "Rats in the maze: Freedom of Movement in the OPT," which refers to Israeli "crimes," "apartheid," and "collective punishment." JLAC also wrote a 34-page report calling on the US to freeze military aid to Israel.
NDC also funds other highly political NGOs: B'Tselem ($450,000), ICAHD ($80,000), Mossawa ($150,000), and the Palestinian NGO Network  ($130,000).

6. Direct SIDA funding for NGOs
 
SIDA also directly funds Swedish and local NGOs (12% of the MENA allocations in 2007, see pg. 42), as distinct from the various funding mechanisms examined above. As noted above, this aspect of SIDA funding lacks transparency and accountability.
 
Diakonia - see above.
 
International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH) - Paris-based FIDH received $813,747 from SIDA for a project in the "human rights" sector; it will either be renewed or end in August 2009. Details about the project's connection to the Middle East are unavailable, but it should be noted that FIDH official Raji Sourani is also director of PCHR (also funded by Sweden, see above). During the Gaza war FIDH claimed that "[t]he operations of the Israeli Army constitute at the least war crimes, if not crimes against humanity."  FIDH has also joined calls for the freezing of the EU-Israel Association agreement due to Israeli "violations of human rights and IHL" and accused Israel of "collective punishment against civilians in Gaza". FIDH published "A Step by Step Approach to the Use of Universal Jurisdiction in Western European States," a guide for promoting "lawfare" - the use of democratic courts to bring "war crimes" cases against Israeli officials. Indeed, as noted, FIDH member PCHR is a leader in the "lawfare" movement.
 
Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PCATI) - PCATI lists SIDA as a donor on its website; it also received a $240,000 grant from the NDC.  PCATI claims to lobby for prisoner rights and against torture.  While it extensively criticizes alleged Israeli abuses, the group has done virtually no campaigning to uphold the rights of Gilad Shalit - held incommunicado by Hamas for three years.  PCATI often lobbies in international forums to promote its one-sided, politicized agenda. For instance, in a report submitted to the UN Committee Against Torture, PCATI accuses Israel of attacks on "civilians and civilian objects" during the Gaza fighting, though the NGO openly admits that these topics "do not per se fall under the [Torture] Convention."
 
Overlap between different frameworks for Swedish NGO funding
 
In 2008 and 2009, many NGOs received funds from different frameworks within the Swedish government. For politicized NGOs that contravene the claimed Swedish goals of "creat[ing] opportunities for a peaceful solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," this raises questions of government oversight in funding processes. For genuine humanitarian projects, this phenomenon increases the bureaucratic overhead and waste that does not reach the organizations and suffering people who need the aid.  Efficiency, accountability and transparency should be required of all publically-funded NGOs.
It is noteworthy that the Palestinian NGOs listed here are also members of the Palestinian NGO Network (PNGO - see above), which means that they benefit from Swedish funding in yet an additional way.

[see website for table:
http://www.ngo-monitor.org/article/a_clouded_eu_presidency_swedish_funding_for_radical_ngos ]

Conclusion

On July 1, 2009 Sweden assumes the presidency of the European Union. As this detailed report indicates, Sweden's role in funding numerous highly politicized NGOs fuels the conflict, rather than the advancing the stated goals of promoting peace, democracy and development. The lack of independent oversight in the use of taxpayer funds, as shown in this analysis, is especially troubling at a time when accountability is receiving increasing emphasis. In addition, these NGO funding policies are not consistent with the efforts by the EU and member states to play a more central and constructive role in promoting peace negotiations based on compromise, and addressing the concerns of all the parties to the conflict.

As NGO Monitor's analysis reveals, the Swedish government funds NGOs that pursue Palestinian political goals under the guise of "human rights" and "international law," and demonize Israel with the inflammatory rhetoric of "apartheid," "ethnic cleansing," and "massacres." In addition to compounding Israeli mistrust of the role of the EU, which stems in part from support for NGOs that exclusively promote a Palestinian agenda and engage in biased anti-Israel activities, the delegitimization of Israel contradicts Sweden's stated goals for the region. In order to play a positive role as a European leader in assisting the constructive change necessary to end the Arab-Israeli conflict, Sweden's NGO funding practices and priorities will need to change.

Correspondence with the Swedish government
 
As of publication, NGO Monitor was still awaiting SIDA's response.
The Swedish Embassy in Tel Aviv elected not to comment on a draft of this report.
 

--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

Hamas wilde aanslagen op PA in Westoever uitvoeren

 
Snoep uitdelen is een traditie bij geslaagde aanslagen, maar of Hamas dat ook op de Westoever zou doen na een aanval op de eigen PA? Dat klinkt toch wat riskant. Of slaat dit op de Gazastrook. Daar zou volgens minister Koenders voedselschaarste heersen, omdat Israel veel te weinig hulpgoederen de strook binnenlaat. Hoe komt men dan aan die snoepvoorraad? Wellicht nog oud snoep dat ver over de datum is, want Hamas en co proberen telkens weer aanslagen uit te voeren, maar de strenge en internationaal steeds weer veroordeelde veiligheidsmaatregelen van Israel weten bijna alle aanslagen te voorkomen.
 
Wouter
______________

PA: Hamas plotted attacks on West Bank officials
Date: 29 / 06 / 2009  Time:  19:51
www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=38903

 
Ramallah - Ma'an - Hamas members planned attacks on Palestinian Authority (PA) officials in the West Bank on orders from Hamas leaders abroad and the group's armed wing in Gaza, a senior official said on Monday.

At-Tayib Abdul Rahim, secretary-general of the Palestinian Presidency reveled the alleged plot at a news conference in Ramallah. He said the PA learned of the plans from interrogations of Hamas prisoners.

He said that a Hamas cell had planned the attack ahead of the 7 [July] deadline set by Egypt for an agreement between Hamas and Fatah.

Hamas has not yet responded to these charges.

"We learned that some Hamas affiliates were told to prepare to distribute sweets on 1 July at 2:00pm after attacks are completed," Abdul Rahim asserted.

He said however that the security situation was under control and that all those who prepared to undertake attacks against PA officials would be arrested.

"These directives, and these intended attacks are aimed only at thwarting dialogue on 7 July, and that indicates Hamas is not ready to sign agreement in Cairo," Abdul Rahim added. He threatened to reveal the details of these Hamas plans to the public if that would be a necessity.

Abdul Rahim also said that concerned Arab states' leaders had been updated on the details of the newly revealed Hamas plots.

The Palestinian presidency secretary-general reiterated that Hamas security forces in the Gaza Strip had detained about 100 Fatah affiliates including members of the movement's Revolutionary Council as well as regional leaders. He also mentioned that Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas gave directives to release 100 Hamas-affiliated detainees in the West Bank.

Sarkozy vraagt Netanjahoe om Lieberman te ontslaan

 
Sarkozy's advies is zo slecht nog niet, maar het is natuurlijk nogal arrogant en not-done om de premier van een soeverein land een dergelijk advies te geven. Wanneer Lieberman Frankrijk op grove wijze had beledigd was het misschien nog begrijpelijk geweest, maar nu is het vooral een uiting van misplaatste Franse arrogantie. Sarkozy praat ongetwijfeld met meer mensen die z'n type niet helemaal zijn of die een ander beleid voorstaan, en dat hoort bij zijn ambt. Dat hij Lieberman zo openlijk afkeurt en beledigt, getuigt van weinig respect voor Israel.  
 
RP
------------

Sarkozy urges Netanyahu: Get rid of Lieberman
By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent
Last update - 21:54 29/06/2009
www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1096504.html

 
French President Nicolas Sarkozy has urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to "get rid" of hard-line Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, Channel Two reported on Monday.

The Foreign Ministry responded to the report by lambasting the French leader for his "intolerable intervention in internal Israeli affairs."

Sarkozy spent a good portion of his meeting with Netanyahu last Wednesday discussing the composition of the Israeli official, according to the report. The presence of three other Israeli officials at the meeting did not deter the French leader from expressing his true opinion of the foreign minister, said Channel Two.

The French president reportedly told Netanyahu that while he usually scheduled talks with Israel's top foreign envoys on visit to Paris he could not bring himself to meet with Lieberman. According to Channel Two, this statement was accompanied by disparaging hand gestures.

Sarkozy then advised Netanyahu to fire Lieberman and bring former foreign minister Tzipi Livni back into the coalition, according to the report. Netanyahu reportedly told Sarkozy that Lieberman came across differently in private than his public appearances would suggest.

French far-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen also comes across as a nice person in private, Sarkozy reportedly responded, to which Netanyahu replied that Lieberman was not Le Pen and that there was no basis for comparison. Sarkozy then responded that he did not intend to compare.

Hamas zal brief aan Shalit geven 'als hij de oorlog heeft overleefd'

 
Hamas houdt één Israelische soldaat gevangen, en Israel is bereid in ruil voor hem honderden tot meer dan duizend Palestijnse gevangenen vrij te laten. Natuurlijk weet Hamas of Shalit nog leeft of niet. Hij wordt, zoals men zelf zegt, zwaar bewaakt, hij krijgt, naar we mogen aannemen, als hij nog leeft dagelijks te eten en te drinken, en men weet dat hij levend veel meer waard is dan dood. Vanwaar die recente geheimzinnigheid? Zit er meer achter of is het slechts sadisme? Denkt men zo uiteindelijk een hogere prijs voor hem te kunnen krijgen?
Hoe zou de wereld reageren als Israel zou zeggen dat Palestijnen die het gevangen houdt, wellicht niet meer leven omdat ze de laatste Qassam aanval mogelijk niet hebben overleefd?

RP
--------------
 
Hamas to deliver letter to Shalit, 'if he survived the war'
Date: 29 / 06 / 2009  Time:  12:45
www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=38889


Gaza - Ma'an - Hamas leader Osama Al-Mazini promised on Monday to deliver a letter from the family of captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit if the prisoner survived Israel's assault on Gaza last winter.

"Hamas received the letter and promised to send it to the relevant persons. If he is alive it will reach him, but if he is dead it won't reach him because we actually don't know if he is still alive after the Gaza war," he said.

Former US President Jimmy Carter had delivered a letter from the family of the captured soldier to Hamas officials in Gaza earlier this month, in an attempt to restart failing negotiations over his fate and the fate of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners held by Israel.

"Carter asked for a confirmation from us and we replied that we don't know the real fact about whether he is dead or alive after Gaza's war," Al-Mazini added.

Meanwhile, the Hamas official noted that Shalit's location is an extremely guarded secret, and that Israel "doesn't know where [Shalit] is in spite of its spies," adding that recent reports that Israel does not know whether the soldier is alive is true, "not a media speech."

Regardless, the official said that there has been little progress on the soldier's case, but that in the first year of Shalit's detainment, there were understandings reached with Israel. Am-Mazini said that such negotiations ended with the administration of former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who left office earlier this year.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government hasn't submitted anything yet, and all that has been reported in the media are "test balloons," the official added, referring to a number of Israeli and Palestinian reports that a release and prisoner swap were imminent.

Al-Mazini added that choosing Egypt as a mediator was Israel's choice, apparently because Israel, publicly, says it does not negotiate with Hamas, which it considers a "terrorist" organization.

He also said that Israel has agreed not to rearrest anyone freed in the deal, but that there were no guarantees the country's military would not attempt to assassinate them later.

--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

maandag 29 juni 2009

Oorlogsmisdaden Gaza (video voor rechter Goldstone)

 
Maurice Ostroff - een Israëlische Jood die in Zuid-Afrika is geboren en opgegroeid - richt zich in onderstaande video tot zijn voormalige landgenoot, de (eveneens Joodse)rechter Richard Goldstone die een VN onderzoek leidt naar beschuldigingen van oorlogsmisdaden tijdens de recente Gaza Oorlog. Zowel de dreiging van de Qassam raketten uit de Gazastrook als de haat-indoctrinatie van jonge kinderen door Hamas komen hierin aan de orde.
 
 
 
 
 

VS en EU willen Hamas in vredesproces betrekken

 
Baker noted that it is impossible to make peace with people if you are unwilling to talk with them.
 
Nou, het valt ook vies tegen om vrede te sluiten met mensen die je naar de andere wereld willen helpen, en die roepen naar iedereen die het wil horen dat ze geen vrede en geen onderhandelingen met je willen. Als Hamas tot vrede bereid zou zijn, laat ze dan eerst maar eens Israel erkennen, de eerdere overeenkomsten van de PA ermee aanvaarden en zich bereid verklaren de wapens neer te leggen. Het zou zeer schadelijk zijn als de EU en VS die voorwaarden zouden laten vallen.
 
Wouter
_______________
 
U.S., EU seek to include Hamas in peace process
By Akiva Eldar
 
The American government and the European Union are making efforts to include Hamas in a broader diplomatic effort that would include a long-term cease-fire with Israel, reconciliation among Palestinian factions and support for renewed negotiations with Israel on the basis of the Arab peace initiative.

A deal is reportedly being formulated for the transfer of abducted Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit to Egypt, under the assumption that this would encourage Israel to agree to a deal with Hamas that would include the release of Palestinian prisoners and opening border crossings. A European diplomatic source told Haaretz yesterday that talks about manifesting the deal were held secretly until late last week, and only four persons were privy to the details of the talks. Israel was not a party to the effort.

Last week Israeli sources denied knowledge of any developments or plans to transfer Shalit to Egypt, a matter that Arab, and particularly Palestinian sources, gave much attention to in their reports. Israel has downplayed reports of a pending breakthrough in the Shalit case, and Israeli officials urged caution and noted that Shalit's release has been undermined in the past by too many public statements.

According to the Saudi Arabian newspaper Al-Hayat reporting from Damascus, a U.S. official visiting Syria two weeks ago said that "the Hamas leadership has recently made important and interesting statements." The official added that the U.S. is following the Hamas stance and hopes that the group will alter its views and adopt a two-state solution.

Meanwhile, four senior Republican and Democratic figures, including former president Jimmy Carter and former secretary of state James Baker, called on President Barack Obama to initiate a dialogue with Hamas without delay. Speaking during interviews organized by the Foundation for Middle East Peace, Baker said that just like the U.S. found a way to begin dialogue with the PLO, it must do so with Hamas. Baker noted that it is impossible to make peace with people if you are unwilling to talk with them.

Former national security adviser under President George H.W. Bush, Brent Scowcroft, said that if the peace process moves forward, the U.S. will urge Hamas to become part of it in order to avoid isolation.

The elder statesmen expressed their full support for the Obama administration's policies in the Middle East, and agreed that the peace process will not be able to move forward without active American involvement on all levels of negotiations. They also said that an end to Arab-Israeli hostilities is essential for achieving the strategic goals of the U.S. in the Middle East.

Tijdelijke bevriezing nederzettingenbouw in de maak

 
In an effort to placate the Obama administration on the issue of settlements, Barak is mulling a proposal whereby the Israeli government would pledge to a temporary, three-month halt to construction in all West Bank settlements, Army Radio reported on Sunday.
 
Dat klinkt goed. Dan heeft Obama drie maanden de tijd om de Palestijnen aan te zetten tot een serieuze tegen-concessie. Lukt dat, dan moet Israel de maatregel haast wel verlengen, en zouden beide partijen weer serieus kunnen gaan onderhandelen, en zou een stapje zijn gezet op weg naar vrede. Lukt het niet, dan is duidelijk dat de nederzettingen niet het enige of grootste struikelblok zijn, en ook meer druk op de Palestijnen nodig is om tot vrede te komen.
 
RP
-------------

 
Netanyahu: EU receptive to Israel stance on Palestinian statehood
Haaretz - 28 June 2009
 
 
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday that the European heads of state with whom he met last week were receptive to Israel's new position on Palestinian statehood.
 
"I found a receptive ear in Europe to the principles that we presented for the diplomatic process with the Palestinians," said Netanyahu at the start of Sunday's weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem.
 
He listed the principles as, "The recognition of a Jewish state, demilitarizing a Palestinian state, and recognition that any agreement signed will be the end of the conflict and an end to demands [of Israel]."
 
Netanyahu said that these principles garner widespread public support. "I call on the opposition to declare its support for these ideas," he said.
 
On Wednesday, the prime minister said his proposal for a demilitarized Palestinian state was gaining international ground and was the only solution for Middle East peace.
 
"The idea of a demilitarized state will in course become accepted," Netanyahu said after meeting the leaders of France and Italy.
 
"If it is not accepted, there will not be an agreement," he told following his meeting in Paris with French President Nicolas Sarkozy. "It cannot be that there is a Palestinian state and the struggle will continue within it."
 
Sarkozy, meanwhile, said that Israel must take immediate confidence-building measures for Middle East peace, including a complete freeze of construction in West Bank settlements.
 
The French leader told reporters after his meeting with Netanyahu that Israel must also work to improve freedom of movement for Palestinians in the West Bank.
 
Defense Minister Ehud Barak told the cabinet on Sunday that Israel places "great importance" on reaching an understanding with the Obama administration on the issue of construction in West Bank settlements.
 
Commenting on the possibility of a temporary freeze in settlement construction, Barak said the matter has yet to be fully formulated.
 
"The subject of settlements is just part of a wide range of topics of conversation with the Americans," Barak said on Sunday.
 
Barak will travel to the United States on Monday for a meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama's special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell.
 
In an effort to placate the Obama administration on the issue of settlements, Barak is mulling a proposal whereby the Israeli government would pledge to a temporary, three-month halt to construction in all West Bank settlements, Army Radio reported on Sunday.
 
Mitchell was scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Paris last week, although the meeting was put off reportedly due to the remaining gaps that separate Jerusalem and Washington on the subject of "natural growth."
 
Israel seeks American approval to continued construction within the existing municipal boundaries of West Bank settlements in order to accommodate the growing population within the communities, a stance that Washington rejects.
 
The reported proposal would make an exception for some 200 structures which are current in advanced stages of construction, according to Army Radio.
 
The offer of a temporary freeze is intended to gauge the Palestinian response and to determine whether the Americans are willing to consider the proposal.
 
The cabinet will discuss Barak's upcoming trip to Washington during its weekly meeting in Jerusalem on Sunday.
 

Netanjahoe's rookgordijnen rond de nederzettingenbouw

 
Gorenberg heeft gelijk waar hij een aantal argumenten van Netanjahoe tegen de bevriezing van nederzettingen onkracht, maar hij vergeet dat het de vraag is wat een dergelijke toch vrij vergaande eenzijdige concessie Israel oplevert. Niet alleen zou zo'n bouwstop tijdelijk moeten zijn, zij zou ook samen moeten gaan met Palestijnse concessies zoals opgeven van het recht op terugkeer van de vluchtelingen, erkenning van Israel als Joodse staat of een einde aan de opruiing in door de Palestijnse Autoriteit gecontroleerde media. Zo geven beide partijen een duidelijk signaal van goede wil af aan de ander, en dat verhoogt de steun aan beide kanten voor de eigen concessies. Daarnaast is het natuurlijk de vraag of Jeruzalem wel of niet onder zo'n bouwstop moet vallen. Onder de bouwstop die Rabin indertijd instelde viel het er niet onder, en van Netanjahoe een verdergaande stap te verwachten is niet erg realistisch, ook niet in een eventuele toekomstige coalitie met Kadima. Waarbij dan wel weer aangetekend moet worden dat de grenzen van de gemeente Jeruzalem nogal zijn opgerekt en nieuwe grootschalige projecten die buiten de oude gemeentegrenzen liggen wel onder een bouwstop zouden moeten vallen.
 
RP
-----------

Netanyahu's Settlement Smoke Screens
By Gershom Gorenberg
Saturday, June 27, 2009
 
 
JERUSALEM -- It has become a fixed feature in the Israeli media, almost like the weather forecast. Nearly every day come reports that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's government is on the verge of a deal with President Obama to avoid a full freeze on construction in West Bank settlements. The sources are normally Israeli government officials, with an occasional American source speaking very far off the record.
 
What changes from one rumor to the next is the reason that the Obama administration has purportedly decided to let the concrete mixers keep churning: One day it's that Netanyahu has explained that he can't legally stop construction underway. The next day, he has persuaded Washington to accept "natural growth" of existing settlements or explained that his coalition will fall if he stops building. Together, these reasons are about as substantial as smoke, and if U.S. policymakers have done their homework, they know it.
 
Take the claim that the Israeli government doesn't have the legal power to stop construction once it has signed contracts with builders, or after buyers have put down money for homes. Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak reportedly made that case to American envoy George Mitchell this month. But under Israeli Supreme Court precedents, the government's authority to set policy in territory under "belligerent occupation" (the court's terminology) trumps the interests of settlers and Israeli companies.
 
In 1992, the government of Yitzhak Rabin imposed a partial construction freeze in the West Bank. In two rulings, the Israeli Supreme Court rejected challenges to the freeze by developers and the municipal governments of settlements. The court eliminated any doubts left by those decisions with a far-reaching ruling in 2005, when it upheld the authority of the government and parliament to evacuate settlers from their homes in the Gaza Strip.
 
Achieving goals such as "peace, security, [and] international recognition" justified harming settlers' property rights and civil rights as long as they received financial compensation, Israel's highest court held. Let's be logical. If, for reasons of state, the court allowed the government to remove settlers from homes where they had lived for years, it would allow the state to prevent Israelis from completing homes where they haven't yet chosen the kitchen tiles. The only legal question would be how much compensation developers and buyers would receive. Netanyahu's reported assertion that he's hamstrung comes down to a hope that no one in Washington checks Israeli legal history.
 
Another claim is that the major building projects are in "settlement blocs" that are sure to remain in Israeli hands after a peace agreement. The term "blocs" refers loosely to clusters of large communities, most close to the pre-1967 border -- the Ma'aleh Adumim region east of Jerusalem, for instance. But the precise area of the blocs has never been defined. More important, Israel and the Palestinians have yet to reach an agreement on future borders. Lack of certainty about the blocs' future and their size is exactly the reason that the Israeli government continues to promote the blocs' expansion. As always, the purpose of settlement is to create a large enough Israeli presence that evacuation will seem impossible.
 
The argument that allowance must be made for "natural growth" of settlements is equally specious. Supposedly, building is needed to accommodate growing families and the adult children of settlers. But the alternative is obvious: Settlers have the option of moving into Israel proper; so do their children. In reality, migration has consistently flowed the opposite way, with the government's help.
 
As for Netanyahu's coalition -- yes, it could crack if he stops settlement expansion and his endorsement of a Palestinian state shifts from lip service to a diplomatic strategy. But Netanyahu's hard-right coalition is his choice. His Likud Party won fewer votes in the last election than Tzipi Livni's centrist Kadima party. Coalition talks with Livni collapsed over Netanyahu's unwillingness to pursue a two-state solution.
 
Netanyahu could still change his mind. In a multi-party parliamentary democracy, reshuffling a coalition is politics as usual. Livni would also resist an open-ended settlement freeze. But since her goal is to pursue the diplomatic process, she'd have an easier time agreeing to a defined moratorium -- allowing time for talks to proceed. A new coalition would be no less democratically chosen and would be more capable of pursuing peace. Netanyahu resists such a change for the same reason that he wants to expand settlements. He remains an ideological hard-liner, committed to keeping the maximum amount of land under Israeli rule.
 
All pretexts aside, Netanyahu agrees with Obama on this much: Building settlements stands in the way of an Israeli pullback and an agreement based on two states. They disagree on whether that's good or bad.
 
Amid all the rumors, the real question is whether the Obama administration will blink first or stand firm on a freeze as an essential step toward making peace.
 
=========
Gershom Gorenberg is the author of "The Accidental Empire: Israel and the Birth of the Settlements, 1967-1977" and a senior correspondent for the American Prospect. He blogs at http://SouthJerusalem.com.
 
 

Hamas zegt niet te weten of Shalit nog leeft

 
Ook Hamas beheerst de 'kunst' van het manipuleren en marchanderen met de meest heftige emoties en gevoelens van een mens: de angst of een naaste nog in leven is en hoe hij of zij het maakt. Israel zou de onderhandelingen onmiddelijk moeten stoppen, en wellicht zelfs Hamas posities gaan bombarderen totdat Hamas met een bewijs komt of Shalit nog in leven is of niet. Wat dit laag bij de grondse gemanipuleer betreft past maar één antwoord, namelijk een duidelijke grens stellen en laten zien dat je niet met je laat sollen. Misschien dat Carter, VN onderzoeker Goldstone, en Human Rights Watch en Amnesty zich hier ook eens over uit kunnen spreken.
 
RP
------------
 
[Google translation]

The Palestinian Islamic movement Hamas announced that it can not confirm nor deny whether the Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, kidnapped in Gaza is alive.

"The insane war in Gaza destroyed everything, so we do not know if Shalit is alive or dead," Osama al-Muzaini, a Hamas official authorized to speak about the case, told the press today.

Today three years are completed after the capture of Shalit in a raid by a Palestinian militia on an observation post near the Israeli border with Gaza.

Although the couple has sent three letters and a video to your family, since mid last year his health status is unknown.

Muzaini said that in any case, Israel should continue with negotiations to exchange Shalit for Palestinian prisoners and other Arabs.

"The Zionist enemy should follow the negotiations without any sign that confirms or denies if he is alive or dead," he added.

In the last three years Israel and Hamas negotiated with the mediation of Egypt to achieve an exchange that ended up not finding the differences on the amount involved in the negotiations.

The father of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, his brother and several human rights organizations, today asked the governments of Israel and Gaza to their release.

"My call today is that every citizen, man or woman, young or old, closed his eyes for three minutes, so try to imagine my son Gilad is ticking," said Noam Shalit, father of the military, in statements to a local radio station.

--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website:
www.imra.org.il

Blair optimistisch over vredeskansen met Netanjahoe

 
Alleen Nixon kon naar China gaan, werd gezegd. Alleen Begin kon vrede sluiten met Egypte en de Sinai opgeven, en alleen Sharon kon de Gazastrook ontruimen?
 
De gedachte is dat juist een rechtse regering deze stappen kan zetten omdat zij geen felle tegenstand ontmoet, de linkse oppositie is er immers ook voor. Toen Rabin en Barak concessies deden schreeuwde rechts moord, brand en 'verraad'. Zelf aan de macht, werd rechts ook gedwongen tot concessies, onder vooral Amerikaanse druk. Ik geloof niet dat Netanjahoe happig is op een vredesdeal, maar de voornaamste oppositie zou daarbij uit eigen gelederen komen, en uit de religieuze kolonistenbeweging natuurlijk.
 
Wouter
____________
Last update - 00:08 27/06/2009       
Blair: Netanyahu election could be a blessing
By Haaretz Service and Reuters
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1095913.html
 
 
Mideast envoy Tony Blair said on Friday that said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could be in a strong domestic position to deliver concessions for peace, if he was willing to do so.
 
"I hope and believe Prime Minister Netanyahu is sincere about wanting a Palestine state and wanting to help create one. If he is, he could be in a strong position to deliver it," Blair said.
 
Blair, former U.K. prime minister and currently the regional mediator for the Middle East peace Quartet that groups the United Nations, the United States, Russia and the European Union, a deal on a two-state solution in Palestine could be within reach if Israel compromises on issues such as halting settlement expansion.
 
A statement from the Quartet, which met on the sidelines of a G8 foreign ministers' meeting in northern Italy, called for Israel to halt all settlement activities and for Palestinians to combat violent extremism.
 
"There is a virtual consensus across the international community not just as to what needs to happen, but how...which was not the case a couple of years ago," Blair told Reuters.
 
"If Israel were to join that, we could get an agreement and an agreement in my view that protects completely the state of Israel."
 
Direct talks between Israel and the Palestinians could resume soon, Blair said, but the process was at a delicate stage as foreign powers stepped up calls on Jerusalem to ensure a Palestinian state would not be undermined by settlements.
 
In a statement on Friday, G8 ministers urged Israel to halt the expansion of settlements, echoing a recent call from U.S. President Barack Obama after a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington earlier this month.
 
Netanyahu heads a right-leaning coalition that could be fractured if he agreed to a settlement halt.
 
"The advent of the Obama administration has given a new sense of energy and commitment and to a certain extent hope... However, the challenges are still there," Blair said.
 
Before political negotiations on a two-state deal could begin, progress was needed on the ground such as the reopening of the Gaza Strip and the release of an Israeli soldier captured there three years ago by militant group Hamas, Gilad Shalit.
 
Gaza has been under blockade since Hamas seized power there two years ago in fighting with Fatah-led forces.
 
Hamas, shunned by the West for refusing to recognize Israel or to renounce violence, had won an election a year earlier.
 
A statement by the Quartet on Friday called for a halt to all violence and arms trafficking in Gaza and the reopening of all crossing points.
 
Blair said Netanyahu's election this year could prove a blessing, as his hardline government could have the domestic support to make concessions.
 
The world's richest nations earlier on Friday called on Israel to halt construction in West Bank settlements, including that which Jerusalem seeks to pursue to accomodate natural growth.
 
U.S. envoy George Mitchell told a news conference after the Quartet meeting in Italy that the United States hoped Israelis and Palestinians would soon begin "meaningful and productive" peace negotiations.
 
"We believe we are making progress in these efforts and we hope very much to conclude this phase of the discussions and to be able to move into meaningful and productive negotiations in the near future," he said.
 
"We are now trying very hard to seize the very favorably created political atmosphere, of Obama's election to push the peace process forward," UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the conference.
 
The Group of Eight powers also deplored violence in Iran after its disputed election on Friday and urged Tehran to settle the crisis soon through democratic dialogue, according to the final draft statement seen by Reuters.
 
"We deplore post-electoral violence which led to the loss of lives of Iranian civilians and urge Iran to respect fundamental human rights including freedom of expression...," G8 foreign ministers said in the statement.
 
On the Middle East, the G8 called on all parties to "re-enter direct negotiations on all standing issues consistent with the roadmap" and it called for a freeze in Jewish settlement construction on the occupied West Bank.
 
"We also call on both parties to fulfil their obligations under the road map, including a freeze in settlement activity (as well as their 'natural growth') and an unequivocal end to violence and terrorism," the statement read.
 
"We call on all parties to re-enter direct negotiations on all standing issues consistent with the road map, the relevant UNSC resolutions and the Madrid principles..."